Re: KDE packages (3.0.4 and 3.1)

2002-10-08 Thread Ralf Nolden
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 16:50, Mark Purcell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 03:05, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > a) Sorry
> > ...for the inconvenience about the Packages.gz file on the ftp server. I
> > didn't know why I should create 8 subdirectories in a row just for a beta
> > build and that I should have regenerated the Packages.gz file. As said,
> > the KDE 3.1 beta2 was not correct anyway so I think this is a minor issue
> > for now. more important is that it works for b) and c) correctly :-))
>
> Hi Ralf,  Thanks for your efforts with KDE 3.1beta2!
No, it was Yenar who created them. I just uploaded them through my ftp account 
on ktown, that's where the Packages stuff went wrong because I didn't know 
they required all the subdirectories. I hope my versions of 3.0.4 went right, 
we'll see when the announcement is made and downloads can start :-))

Ralf
>
> You don't have to put the packages into subdirectories. You just need to
> regenerate the Packages and Sources files in that directory:
>
> $ dpkg-scanpackages . override | gzip > Packages.gz
> $ dpkg-scansources . | gzip > Sources.gz
>
> Mark
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE9ovDKoCzanz0IthIRAqgBAJ92WfoKxs6ujMnDLuF9qRBCcx3VwwCfUZRw
> Tk1XNbGkKWm3NphePKeXwqg=
> =ifzm
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
We're not a company, we just produce better code at less costs.

Ralf Nolden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The K Desktop Environment   The KDevelop Project
http://www.kde.org  http://www.kdevelop.org




Re: KDE packages (3.0.4 and 3.1)

2002-10-08 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 03:05, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> a) Sorry
> ...for the inconvenience about the Packages.gz file on the ftp server. I
> didn't know why I should create 8 subdirectories in a row just for a beta
> build and that I should have regenerated the Packages.gz file. As said, the
> KDE 3.1 beta2 was not correct anyway so I think this is a minor issue for
> now. more important is that it works for b) and c) correctly :-))

Hi Ralf,  Thanks for your efforts with KDE 3.1beta2!

You don't have to put the packages into subdirectories. You just need to 
regenerate the Packages and Sources files in that directory:

$ dpkg-scanpackages . override | gzip > Packages.gz
$ dpkg-scansources . | gzip > Sources.gz

Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9ovDKoCzanz0IthIRAqgBAJ92WfoKxs6ujMnDLuF9qRBCcx3VwwCfUZRw
Tk1XNbGkKWm3NphePKeXwqg=
=ifzm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: KDE packages (3.0.4 and 3.1)

2002-10-07 Thread Yenar Calentaure
Ralf Nolden wrote:
Hi,
three things :-)
a) Sorry
...for the inconvenience about the Packages.gz file on the ftp server. I 
didn't know why I should create 8 subdirectories in a row just for a beta 
build and that I should have regenerated the Packages.gz file. As said, the 
KDE 3.1 beta2 was not correct anyway so I think this is a minor issue for 
now. more important is that it works for b) and c) correctly :-))
I already rearranged my packages build to use apt-source root directory, 
so it can be uploaded without changes next time. I'll hopefully provide 
packages next week (a HEAD snapshot).

b) KDE-3.0.4 Release
I'm packaging up KDE 3.0.4 for both, sid and woody. Woody gives me a bit of a 
problem in kdelibs-data not installing the files in /etc/kde3 there, so if 
you have any idea why that is, please tell me :-). The woody release will 
include a backport of qt-3.0.5 from unstable and a fix in kdelibs that avoids 
the stretching of the ktipdialog with qt-3.0.5.  At any rate, qt has been 
compiled with -no-xft to avoid application crashes under XFree 4.1, so if 
I have 4.1 (stock woody version), antialiasing and everything works 
fine. Err, qt 3.1 (beta 2 probably, i use qt-copy). Oh, do you have 
woody installation? Do you still need my builds or should i give up on them?

you're missing antialiasing and you're running XFree 4.2, take the version 
from unstable. Another minor change in kdebase will be that this ugly debian 
background logo will be away by default and be replaced with the usual debian 
logo in the logo field of the greeter in KDM. The default background 
wallpaper will be the default_blue.jpg as is stock with KDE. It's much more 
pleasant to the eyes and you don't want to scare away your users at the login 
screen already, do you ? :-)
The debian background is nice, isn't it? But i'd appreciate better 
debian logo for kdm logo area (the one provided is bit rough imho).

c) KDE 3.1 Release (and RC's)
When I'm done with the 3.0.4 packages, I'll switch to HEAD again and help 
solve the remaining issues with the packages there so we can be able to 
provide RC packages when they are due and final packages, too, as soon as the 
KDE release date is coming up and the packagers get the packages provided by 
Dirk Mueller as usual.
Cool, i will test them as well :).
I hope you can live with that I'm struggling a bit, but being a Debian user 
since 3 weeks only I hope you can live with that I try to catch up for a week 
:-)
Your effort is much appreciated, thanks.
Ralf

--
---
inetname: Yenar Calentaure
realname: Peter Rockai
mail: yenar(at)host.sk
homepage: http://yenar.host.sk
---
The universe is entering maintenance mode in 2 minutes. Please logout.
 -- Your administrator
---



Re: KDE packages (3.0.4 and 3.1)

2002-10-06 Thread Franz Keferböck
On Sunday 06 October 2002 19:05, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> three things :-)
>
> a) Sorry
> ...for the inconvenience about the Packages.gz file on the ftp server. I
> didn't know why I should create 8 subdirectories in a row just for a beta
> build and that I should have regenerated the Packages.gz file. As said, the
> KDE 3.1 beta2 was not correct anyway so I think this is a minor issue for
> now. more important is that it works for b) and c) correctly :-))
>
> b) KDE-3.0.4 Release
> I'm packaging up KDE 3.0.4 for both, sid and woody. Woody gives me a bit of
> a problem in kdelibs-data not installing the files in /etc/kde3 there, so
> if you have any idea why that is, please tell me :-). The woody release
> will include a backport of qt-3.0.5 from unstable and a fix in kdelibs that
> avoids the stretching of the ktipdialog with qt-3.0.5.  At any rate, qt has
> been compiled with -no-xft to avoid application crashes under XFree 4.1, so
> if you're missing antialiasing and you're running XFree 4.2, take the
> version from unstable. Another minor change in kdebase will be that this
> ugly debian background logo will be away by default and be replaced with
> the usual debian logo in the logo field of the greeter in KDM. The default
> background wallpaper will be the default_blue.jpg as is stock with KDE.
> It's much more pleasant to the eyes and you don't want to scare away your
> users at the login screen already, do you ? :-)
>
> c) KDE 3.1 Release (and RC's)
> When I'm done with the 3.0.4 packages, I'll switch to HEAD again and help
> solve the remaining issues with the packages there so we can be able to
> provide RC packages when they are due and final packages, too, as soon as
> the KDE release date is coming up and the packagers get the packages
> provided by Dirk Mueller as usual.
>
> I hope you can live with that I'm struggling a bit, but being a Debian user
> since 3 weeks only I hope you can live with that I try to catch up for a
> week

Can live with that? I appreciate everything you do and have to be _thankful_! 
Thankfull to all debian-kde developers, we can't stress that too often, if 
you wouldn't do it your way we might not have packages at all!
BTW, I'm using current 3.1b2 packages and they are quite nice... looking 
forward to the RC1 packages!

MfG
Franz Keferböck


>
> :-)
>
> Ralf
> --
> We're not a company, we just produce better code at less cost.
> 
> Ralf Nolden
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The K Desktop Environment The KDevelop Project
> http://www.kde.orghttp://www.kdevelop.org