Kernel version for etch 4.0 release?

2006-10-02 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi

I have the same question as I asked a bit more than a month ago.
I can see that 2.6.18 is available in unstable and 2.6.17 is
available in testing. Which one will be the one for the release?
Do you know that (assuming release sometime in the end of the year
or early next year) or is it still an open issue?

Regards,

// Ola

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:38:00PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I got a question from the openvz upstream people on which version
> of the kernel that will be released as the version in etch. Do you
> know if it will be 2.6.17 or if any later version may be used?
> Assuming that the release date sometime in december still holds.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> // Ola
> 
> -- 
>  - Ola Lundqvist ---
> /  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37  \
> |  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD  |
> |  +46 (0)54-10 14 30  +46 (0)70-332 1551   |
> |  http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
> \  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
>  ---

-- 
 --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering 
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Annebergsslingan 37\
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   654 65 KARLSTAD|
|  http://opalsys.net/   Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
 ---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#390616: linux-image-2.6.18: Enable ATA-Security for Sid kernels

2006-10-02 Thread schorpp
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7
Version: 2.6.18-1
Severity: important
File: linux-image-2.6.18


tom1:/home/schorpp# hdlock

/dev/hdc:
 Issuing SECURITY_SET_PASS command, password="xx", user=master,
 mode=max
 Problem issuing security command: Invalid argument
 Error: 22
 You need to configure your kernel with CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL.

(hdparm >= 6.3)

Pls enable CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL, it is stable since 2.6.16, 
thx.

y
tom

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (101, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7 depends on:
ii  module-init-tools 3.2.2-3tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  yaird [linux-initramfs-tool]  0.0.12-18  Yet Another mkInitRD

-- debconf information excluded


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Kernel version for etch 4.0 release?

2006-10-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:11:20AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I have the same question as I asked a bit more than a month ago.
> I can see that 2.6.18 is available in unstable and 2.6.17 is
> available in testing. Which one will be the one for the release?
> Do you know that (assuming release sometime in the end of the year
> or early next year) or is it still an open issue?

The kernel team strongly favours a 2.6.18 kernel for etch, already many fixes
are only in the 2.6.18 kernel, and not in the 2.6.17 one, but d-i is still
building 2.6.17 daily builds, and aim to do a -rc1 release with 2.6.17 (which
i believe to be a mistake in the long run, but what can i say).

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch

2006-10-02 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> BTW, do you know anything about the xen/powerpc status ? 

No. I don't even know if it needs a modified kernel or not for normal
operation. Xen supports some PAPR hypercalls but I don't think it is
enough to support unmodified kernels.

Bastian

-- 
... The prejudices people feel about each other disappear when they get
to know each other.
-- Kirk, "Elaan of Troyius", stardate 4372.5


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch

2006-10-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:49:29AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > BTW, do you know anything about the xen/powerpc status ? 
> 
> No. I don't even know if it needs a modified kernel or not for normal
> operation. Xen supports some PAPR hypercalls but I don't think it is
> enough to support unmodified kernels.

Ok, let me investigate about this this evening.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



whiteheat

2006-10-02 Thread Hans Köhler
Just want to ask if there is a special reason why usb-serial module 
"whiteheat" is not compiled in the kernel-image .deb file? I'm missing 
it since 2.6.16 (I think).


kind regards
hans


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Administrator Equivalent

2006-10-02 Thread Fletcher Edwardsd
 .

Would you like to generate at least 1.5K to 3.5K daily just for returning
phone calls?
If you have a phone and can return calls you are fully qualified.

Contact us : 888-705-1353

Respects,
Fletcher Edwardsd



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#383264: Works for me with recent kernel from unstable

2006-10-02 Thread Dmitry Semyonov

Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686
Version: 2.6.18-2

I was able to load the kernel on Compaq DL380 with serial console
enabled for both GRUB and kernel messages.

Note that I experienced the same issue with previous (2.6.17) kernel.
So, I assume it is fixed in 2.6.18.

--
...Bye..Dmitry.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of linux-latest-2.6_3_amd64.changes

2006-10-02 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-latest-2.6_3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  linux-latest-2.6_3.dsc
  linux-latest-2.6_3.tar.gz
  linux-image-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-xen-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-xen-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-xen-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-amd64-generic_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-em64t-p4_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-vserver-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6-vserver-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-amd64-generic_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



linux-latest-2.6_3_amd64.changes is NEW

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Installer
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-generic_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-amd64-generic_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
(new) linux-headers-2.6-xen-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux 2.6 on AMD64
 This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for the
 latest Linux kernel 2.6 on all 64bit single- and multiprocessor AMD and
 Intel machines.
linux-image-2.6-amd64-generic_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-2.6-amd64-generic_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-2.6-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6-em64t-p4_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-2.6-em64t-p4_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6-vserver-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-2.6-vserver-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-2.6-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6-vserver-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-2.6-vserver-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
(new) linux-image-2.6-xen-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb optional admin
Linux kernel 2.6 image on AMD64
 This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel 2.6 on
 all 64bit single- and multiprocessor AMD and Intel machines.
linux-image-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
linux-image-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-image-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb
(new) linux-image-xen-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb optional admin
Linux kernel image on AMD64
 This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel on all
 64bit single- and multiprocessor AMD and Intel machines.
linux-latest-2.6_3.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-latest-2.6_3.dsc
linux-latest-2.6_3.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-latest-2.6_3.tar.gz
Changes: linux-latest-2.6 (3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * Update linux-latest to 2.6.18.


Override entries for your package:
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-generic_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
linux-headers-2.6-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-image-2.6-amd64-generic_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
linux-image-2.6-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - optional admin
linux-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
linux-image-2.6-em64t-p4_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
linux-image-2.6-vserver-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
linux-image-2.6-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - optional admin
linux-image-2.6-vserver-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - extra admin
linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - optional admin
linux-image-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - optional admin
linux-image-vserver-amd64_2.6.18+3_amd64.deb - optional admin
linux-image-xen-amd64_2.6.18+

Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch

2006-10-02 Thread Jaume Sabater

Bastian Blank wrote:


Upstream forked a 3.0.3 tree a week ago. I hope they will release it in
the next two weeks. I think it will be a good idea to release this with
Etch. This may be also a good target as RHEL5 will also release with
Linux 2.6.18 (we use their xen patch for the kernel already) and Xen
3.0.3.

My current plan is:
- Upload 3.0.3-testing with version 3.0.3~rc1+hg$revision and abi
  3.0.3-rc1.
- Let it migrate to testing.
- Update kernel to use this one as first option instead of only
  3.0-unstable-1.
- Remove xen-unstable from testing after anything else is migrated.


Having Xen 3.0.3 in Etch sounds really well :)

--
Jaume Sabater
http://linuxsilo.net/

"Ubi sapientas ibi libertas"


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 389918

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 389918 + pending
Bug#389918: linux-2.6: Please enable CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 381951

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 381951 + pending
Bug#381951: linux-2.6: Please make CONFIG_EFI_VARS modular (i386)
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 390616

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 390616 + pending
Bug#390616: linux-image-2.6.18: Enable ATA-Security for Sid kernels
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295678: marked as done (kernel-image packages with CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y enabled)

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:46:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line PAE support in Debian kernel images..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-2
Severity: wishlist

Please consider to release additional kernel-image packages with 
CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y and PAE enabled by default.


The current default kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp will only recognise 3GB 
out of 4GB memory on a Dell PowerEdge 1800 Dual Xeon Server. I fixed 
this problem by installed a kernal-image package which was rebuild with 
the CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y option.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

we have linux-image-2.6.18-1-686-bigmem in the archive now, thus closing
this bug.

Best regards
Frederik Schueler

-- 
ENOSIG
--- End Message ---


Wacom Tablet Driver dosen't work as expected

2006-10-02 Thread Meinert Jordan

Hello,

I've installed Linux kernel 2.6.17-2-k7 a few days ago. But the wacom 
driver for my Volito2 Tablet seems to do nothing. It's loaded on 
pluging in the USB-device, but I could not receive any vital signs from 
the relevant /dev/input/event?.

Trying kernel version 2.6.18 from Sid has no other result.
The kernels 2.6.16 and former kernels are working fine.
As well does kernel 2.6.17 with self compiled modules form 
linuxwacom.sf.net (tested production: 0.7.4-3 and development: 0.7.5-4).


Through I'm more user than expert, I hope this are all informations you need.

Meinert Jordan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#390695: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686: weird messages upon loading the CD-ROM driver

2006-10-02 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686
Version: 2.6.18-2
Severity: minor

Upon loading the driver for the CD-Rom on my Notebook the driver spits out
weird messages. I'm attaching the relevant part of dmesg. The part of the
lilo.conf reads:

image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-1-686
label="Lin_2.6.18-1"
initrd=/boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-1-686
append="irqpoll"
read-only

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # lspci -v -s 00:10.0
00:10.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c3) (prog-if fa)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Unknown device 1010
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 15
I/O ports at 6050 [size=16]
Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 2

The bug occured for the first time around Linux 2.6.16 and occurs since
then. The notebook is an Acer Travelmate 524TEV.

Thanks for listening,
  Hilmar
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to POSIX)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.18-1-686 depends on:
ii  module-init-tools 3.2.2-3tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  yaird [linux-initramfs-tool]  0.0.12-18  Yet Another mkInitRD

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.18-1-686 recommends:
pn  libc6-i686 (no description available)

-- debconf information excluded
Probing IDE interface ide0...
hda: IBM-DJSA-210, ATA DISK drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
Probing IDE interface ide1...
hdc: MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8175, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
irq 15: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
  __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69   note_interrupt+0x18e/0x1bb
  __do_IRQ+0xa0/0xd1   do_IRQ+0x19/0x24
  common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20   __do_softirq+0x4f/0xc2
  do_softirq+0x2e/0x32   do_IRQ+0x1e/0x24
  common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20   
_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x6/0x7
  setup_irq+0xab/0x108   ide_intr+0x0/0x18b [ide_core]
  request_irq+0x6f/0x8b   init_irq+0x1eb/0x423 [ide_core]
  register_blkdev+0xc8/0xd2   __driver_attach+0x0/0x5d
  hwif_init+0x121/0x310 [ide_core]   
__driver_attach+0x0/0x5d
  probe_hwif_init_with_fixup+0x1a/0x66 [ide_core]   
ide_setup_pci_device+0x62/0x6d [ide_core]
  pci_device_probe+0x36/0x57   driver_probe_device+0x42/0x8b
  __driver_attach+0x38/0x5d   bus_for_each_dev+0x33/0x55
  driver_attach+0x11/0x13   __driver_attach+0x0/0x5d
  bus_add_driver+0x64/0xfd   __pci_register_driver+0x47/0x63
  sys_init_module+0x151e/0x16c9   
generic_file_read+0x98/0xac
  pci_bus_read_config_byte+0x0/0x58   dput+0x1a/0x118
  __fput+0x119/0x13c   syscall_call+0x7/0xb
handlers:
[] (ide_intr+0x0/0x18b [ide_core])
Disabling IRQ #15
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
hda: max request size: 128KiB
hda: 19640880 sectors (10056 MB) w/384KiB Cache, CHS=19485/16/63, UDMA(33)
hda: cache flushes not supported
 hda: hda1


Bug#385842: linux-source-2.6.18: cannot install self-compiled 2.6.18-2 with lilo

2006-10-02 Thread root
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18-2
Followup-For: Bug #385842

I got linux-source-2.6.18-2 and self-compiled the kernel with make-kpkg.
everything fine, but dpkg -i gets me an error because some grub script
cannot be run from the postinst-script. 
the source package has no dependency on grub, but I think lilo should be
supported too.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-5-1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.18 depends on:
ii  binutils  2.17-2 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  bzip2 1.0.3-6high-quality block-sorting file co

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.18 recommends:
ii  gcc  4:4.1.1-9   The GNU C compiler
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.6.ds1-5 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  make 3.81-3  The GNU version of the "make" util

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389994: Found the bug, patch attached

2006-10-02 Thread Tim Phipps
The bug is in this section:

if [ "${NFSROOT#:*}" = "$NFSROOT" ]; then
NFSROOT=${ROOTSERVER}:${NFSROOT}
fi

The :* is the wrong way around so if $NFSROOT=192.168.0.4:/ the :*
pattern won't match (NFSROOT doesn't start with :) and so NFSROOT gets
turned into 192.168.0.4:192.168.0.4:/ which fails to mount. Changing the
pattern to *: works as (would %:*).

Cheers,
Tim.
52c52
<   if [ "${NFSROOT#:*}" = "$NFSROOT" ]; then
---
>   if [ "${NFSROOT#*:}" = "$NFSROOT" ]; then


Processed: Re: Bug#389994: Found the bug, patch attached

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 389994 serious
Bug#389994: initramfs-tools: NFS timeout on first mount causes looping.
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389994: Found the bug, patch attached

2006-10-02 Thread maximilian attems
severity 389994 serious
stop

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 05:13:24PM +0100, Tim Phipps wrote:
> The bug is in this section:
> 
> if [ "${NFSROOT#:*}" = "$NFSROOT" ]; then
> NFSROOT=${ROOTSERVER}:${NFSROOT}
> fi
> 
> The :* is the wrong way around so if $NFSROOT=192.168.0.4:/ the :*
> pattern won't match (NFSROOT doesn't start with :) and so NFSROOT gets
> turned into 192.168.0.4:192.168.0.4:/ which fails to mount. Changing the
> pattern to *: works as (would %:*).

sorry i was away this weekend without connection,
that was my first suspicion, thanks for your confirmation!
yes aboves thinko is fixed in initramfs-tools 0.81 in unstable,
should propagate soon.

 
> Cheers,
> Tim.

> 52c52
> < if [ "${NFSROOT#:*}" = "$NFSROOT" ]; then
> ---
> > if [ "${NFSROOT#*:}" = "$NFSROOT" ]; then

-- 
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#385842: linux-source-2.6.18: cannot install self-compiled 2.6.18-2 with lilo

2006-10-02 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 05:31:40PM +0200, root wrote:
> I got linux-source-2.6.18-2 and self-compiled the kernel with make-kpkg.
> everything fine, but dpkg -i gets me an error because some grub script
> cannot be run from the postinst-script. 
> the source package has no dependency on grub, but I think lilo should be
> supported too.

it is possible, you choose grub in d-i.
just fix your /etc/kernel-img.conf

-- 
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: notfound 389994 in 0.80

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> notfound 389994 0.80
Bug#389994: initramfs-tools: NFS timeout on first mount causes looping.
Bug marked as not found in version 0.80.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: found 389994 in 0.80

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 389994 0.80
Bug#389994: initramfs-tools: NFS timeout on first mount causes looping.
Bug marked as found in version 0.80.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#383264: Works for me with recent kernel from unstable

2006-10-02 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 04:11:27PM +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686
> Version: 2.6.18-2
> 
> I was able to load the kernel on Compaq DL380 with serial console
> enabled for both GRUB and kernel messages.
> 
> Note that I experienced the same issue with previous (2.6.17) kernel.
> So, I assume it is fixed in 2.6.18.

hey Dmitry,
  This sounds like a *success* report, not a bug report ;)
Is this a follow up to another bug report? If so, which one?


-- 
dann frazier



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch

2006-10-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:58:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:49:29AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > BTW, do you know anything about the xen/powerpc status ? 
> > 
> > No. I don't even know if it needs a modified kernel or not for normal
> > operation. Xen supports some PAPR hypercalls but I don't think it is
> > enough to support unmodified kernels.
> 
> Ok, let me investigate about this this evening.

Not ready for prime time, only js20/21 ppc970 blades are supported, and there
is no VIOS, so no disk or network, which makes this probably not all that
useful, even if it where stable.

For reference, here is the link : http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPPC

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: whiteheat

2006-10-02 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:18:18AM +0200, Hans K?hler wrote:
> Just want to ask if there is a special reason why usb-serial module 
> "whiteheat" is not compiled 
> in the kernel-image .deb file? I'm missing it since 2.6.16 (I think).

What package (i.e., what architecture)? It is there on my arch...

I suggest reporting a bug against linux-2.6 that includes the package
name and version in which this module no longer exists.

-- 
dann frazier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Wacom Tablet Driver dosen't work as expected

2006-10-02 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 05:19:13PM +0200, Meinert Jordan wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've installed Linux kernel 2.6.17-2-k7 a few days ago. But the wacom driver 
> for my Volito2 
> Tablet seems to do nothing.

hey Meinert,
  I suggest filing a bug - its easy to lose track of issues reported
via the mailing list.

-- 
dann frazier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#390724: Ooops on Xen reboot

2006-10-02 Thread Andreas Barth
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.18-2

Hi,

on rebooting my Xen dom0, I got this error message.


Cheers,
Andi

 Kernel BUG at drivers/xen/netfront/netfront.c:717
 invalid opcode:  [1] SMP
 CPU 0
 Modules linked in: ipv6 dm_snapshot dm_mirror dm_mod evdev pcspkr ext3 jbd 
mbcache raid1 md_mod
 Pid: 8, comm: xenwatch Not tainted 2.6.18-1-xen-amd64 #1
 RIP: e030:[]  [] 
network_alloc_rx_buffers+0x1de/0x460
 RSP: e02b:8800070d7de0  EFLAGS: 00010086
 RAX:  RBX: 8800083ebd80 RCX: 0040
 RDX:  RSI:  RDI: 1048
 RBP: 8800013d8500 R08: 80455b88 R09: 0001
 R10: 0001 R11: 88000156d460 R12: 05605000
 R13: 880007344838 R14: 0209 R15: 8800013ddae0
 FS:  2ae1cded4100() GS:804c3000() knlGS:
 CS:  e033 DS:  ES: 
 Process xenwatch (pid: 8, threadinfo 8800070d6000, task 8800070bc100)
 Stack:  8800070d7e40  8800013d8000  88000145c000 000f
  00d10100  8800013f6d68  00d1 002f04ed2e70
  0009  0001
 Call Trace:
  [] backend_changed+0x1c8/0x232
  [] xenwatch_thread+0x0/0x145
  [] keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0x61
  [] xenwatch_handle_callback+0x15/0x48
  [] xenwatch_thread+0x12d/0x145
  [] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
  [] keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0x61
  [] xenwatch_thread+0x0/0x145
  [] kthread+0xd4/0x107
  [] child_rip+0xa/0x12
  [] keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0x61
  [] worker_thread+0x0/0x122
  [] worker_thread+0x0/0x122
  [] kthread+0x0/0x107
  [] child_rip+0x0/0x12


 Code: 0f 0b 68 ec ee 41 80 c2 cd 02 4c 63 e2 48 8d bd 80 15 00 00
 RIP  [] network_alloc_rx_buffers+0x1de/0x460
  RSP 
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Error message from pcmcia (i82365)

2006-10-02 Thread Matthias Popp
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:  Error message from pcmcia (i82365)

Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-486
Version: 1

While loading the modul i82365 error message "Intel ISA PCIC Probe: not found" 
appears permanently, if there is no pcmcia-device avaliable in the machine.
There is no way to stop this error message, only a reboot helps to work again 
with this machine.

I am using Debian SId  with libc6  2.3.6.ds1-4 . But I have found this bug 
first in a Debian installer build by my self.  The installer is extremly 
slow. 

-- 
with best regards from Dortmund
                                                     Matthias Popp (KBDCALLS)


pgp3NH68Pbxkc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#390541: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: 2.6.17 fails to detect PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-K15, works fine with 2.6.16

2006-10-02 Thread Georg Wittenburg
Hi Oleg!

On Sunday 01 October 2006 23:36, you wrote:
> On 2006-10-01, Georg Wittenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
> > Version: 2.6.17-9
> > Severity: normal
>
> [-0-]
>
> > Kernel 2.6.17 (from linux-image-2.6.17-2-686) fails to detect the
> > build-in PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-K15 drive of my Sony VAIO FS295XP laptop.
> > This worked fine with 2.6.16 (from linux-image-2.6.16-2-686) and
> > previous kernels.
> >
> > Related output from dmesg looks as follows:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ egrep "ide.?:|hdb" dmesg-2.6.1*
> > dmesg-2.6.16:ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes;
> > override with idebus=xx
> > dmesg-2.6.16:ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1880-0x1887, BIOS settings: hda:DMA,
> > hdb:DMA
> > dmesg-2.6.16:hdb: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-K15, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> > dmesg-2.6.16:hdb: ATAPI 31X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2000kB Cache,
> > UDMA(33)
> > dmesg-2.6.17:ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes;
> > override with idebus=xx
> > dmesg-2.6.17:ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1880-0x1887, BIOS settings: hda:DMA,
> > hdb:DMA
>
> There isn't much output, but maybe it was fixed in 2.6.18. Try that please.

Doesn't seem like it was fixed in 2.6.18 (from linux-image-2.6.18-1-686), 
unfortunately.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ egrep "ide.?:|hdb" dmesg-2.6.18
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1880-0x1887, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA


> This maybe related:
> git commit: a4f5749ba6e3f23ae4a137cee10324830db4d081, libata patch


Thanks for your time.

Regards,
   Georg

-- 
Georg Wittenburg
http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/~wittenbu/


pgpvNKwXNvtkb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch

2006-10-02 Thread Jim Crilly
On 10/01/06 05:08:51PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
> 
> Upstream forked a 3.0.3 tree a week ago. I hope they will release it in
> the next two weeks. I think it will be a good idea to release this with
> Etch. This may be also a good target as RHEL5 will also release with
> Linux 2.6.18 (we use their xen patch for the kernel already) and Xen
> 3.0.3.
> 
> My current plan is:
> - Upload 3.0.3-testing with version 3.0.3~rc1+hg$revision and abi
>   3.0.3-rc1.
> - Let it migrate to testing.
> - Update kernel to use this one as first option instead of only
>   3.0-unstable-1.
> - Remove xen-unstable from testing after anything else is migrated.
> 
> Comments?
>

Currently it looks like you're just shipping dom0 kernels, are there any
plans to ship domU kernels too?

Jim.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch

2006-10-02 Thread Otavio Salvador
Jim Crilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 10/01/06 05:08:51PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> Hi folks
>> 
>> Upstream forked a 3.0.3 tree a week ago. I hope they will release it in
>> the next two weeks. I think it will be a good idea to release this with
>> Etch. This may be also a good target as RHEL5 will also release with
>> Linux 2.6.18 (we use their xen patch for the kernel already) and Xen
>> 3.0.3.
>> 
>> My current plan is:
>> - Upload 3.0.3-testing with version 3.0.3~rc1+hg$revision and abi
>>   3.0.3-rc1.
>> - Let it migrate to testing.
>> - Update kernel to use this one as first option instead of only
>>   3.0-unstable-1.
>> - Remove xen-unstable from testing after anything else is migrated.
>> 
>> Comments?
>>
>
> Currently it looks like you're just shipping dom0 kernels, are there any
> plans to ship domU kernels too?

The kernels works to both, dom0 and domU. You use same kernel image.

-- 
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
-
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: notfound 389994 in 0.81

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> notfound 389994 0.81
Bug#389994: initramfs-tools: NFS timeout on first mount causes looping.
Bug marked as not found in version 0.81.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: found 389994 in 0.80

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 389994 0.80
Bug#389994: initramfs-tools: NFS timeout on first mount causes looping.
Bug marked as found in version 0.80.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#390759: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686: high memory in use with just 1GB (worked in 2.6.17)

2006-10-02 Thread Stephen Kitt
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686
Version: 2.6.18-2
Severity: normal


Hi,

With the standard 2.6.17-?-686 images, my 1GB system mapped all its
memory as low memory; since 2.6.18-1-686, I'm back to the old, pre-
HIGHMEM4G situation with 127MB mapped as high memory.

I'm attaching two dmesg logs for comparison.

I haven't tried rebuiling my own 2.6.18 kernel...

Regards,

Stephen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.18-1-686 depends on:
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.80   tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools 3.2.2-3tools for managing Linux kernel mo

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.18-1-686 recommends:
ii  libc6-i686   2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i

-- debconf information:
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.18-1-686:
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.18-1-686: false
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.18-1-686:
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.18-1-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.18-1-686:
* linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.18-1-686:
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.18-1-686:
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.18-1-686: false
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.18-1-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.18-1-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.18-1-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.18-1-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.18-1-686:
  shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.18-1-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.18-1-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.18-1-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.18-1-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.18-1-686:
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.18-1-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-1-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
Linux version 2.6.17-2-686 (Debian 2.6.17-9) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 
4.1.2 20060901 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-13)) #1 SMP Wed Sep 13 16:34:10 UTC 
2006
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
 BIOS-e820:  - 0009fc00 (usable)
 BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 000e8000 - 0010 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 0010 - 3ff3 (usable)
 BIOS-e820: 3ff3 - 3ff4 (ACPI data)
 BIOS-e820: 3ff4 - 3fff (ACPI NVS)
 BIOS-e820: 3fff - 4000 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: ffb8 - 0001 (reserved)
0MB HIGHMEM available.
1023MB LOWMEM available.
found SMP MP-table at 000ff780
On node 0 totalpages: 261936
  DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:0
  Normal zone: 257840 pages, LIFO batch:31
DMI 2.3 present.
ACPI: RSDP (v002 ACPIAM) @ 0x000f9e30
ACPI: XSDT (v001 A M I  OEMXSDT  0x09000420 MSFT 0x0097) @ 0x3ff30100
ACPI: FADT (v003 A M I  OEMFACP  0x09000420 MSFT 0x0097) @ 0x3ff30290
ACPI: MADT (v001 A M I  OEMAPIC  0x09000420 MSFT 0x0097) @ 0x3ff30390
ACPI: OEMB (v001 A M I  OEMBIOS  0x09000420 MSFT 0x0097) @ 0x3ff40040
ACPI: DSDT (v001  P4P81 P4P81103 0x0103 INTL 0x02002026) @ 0x
ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x808
ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
Processor #0 15:2 APIC version 20
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled)
Processor #1 15:2 APIC version 20
ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0])
IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 32, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
Enabling APIC mode:  Flat.  Using 1 I/O APICs
Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
Allocating PCI resources starting at 5000 (gap: 4000:bfb8)
Built 1 zonelists
Kernel command line: root=/dev/md0 ro 
mapped APIC to d000 (fee0)
mapped IOAPIC to c000 (fec0)
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Initializing CPU#0
PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 16384 bytes)
Detected 2598.981 MHz processor.
Using pmtmr for high-res timesource
Console: colour VGA+ 80x

Bug#390752: navigation slowdown connected to terminal Ericsson F251m

2006-10-02 Thread rodrigo valiña gutiérrez

Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-16

I am using Debian 3.1r0a Sarge and I connect to Internet with a serial
modem plugged to the phone line which ends into terminal "Ericsson
F251m".

When i connect the Linux box to the modem:

1) navigation is much slower than from the Windows box with same
hardware and configuration. but downloading with wget or similar ir
equally fast.

2) I can not connect to my msn account not with Gaim not with aMSN

the avobe problems dissapear if I connect the Linux box to a Windows
box with DHCP.

so it is strange.
maybe a bug in PPP?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch

2006-10-02 Thread Jim Crilly
On 10/02/06 06:26:27PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> 
> The kernels works to both, dom0 and domU. You use same kernel image.
> 

Nice, I didn't know that was possible. Is that mentioned in the docs
somewhere, although I admit I didn't look very hard.

Jim.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#390594: jackd: kernel oops when setting Jack transport mode to sync in Rosegarden

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 390594 linux-2.6
Bug#390594: jackd: kernel oops when setting Jack transport mode to sync in 
Rosegarden
Bug reassigned from package `jackd' to `linux-2.6'.

> retitle 390594 Oops in snd_emu10k1, jackd and snd_rtctimer related
Bug#390594: jackd: kernel oops when setting Jack transport mode to sync in 
Rosegarden
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#390791: mkinitramfs doesn't include required firmware

2006-10-02 Thread Michael Shuey
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.80

mkinitramfs doesn't include the contents of /lib/firmware in the initramfs.  
It does, however, include a wide array of disk drivers by default (well, 
when using the "most" driver set) - including the qla2xxx fibre channel 
driver.  Recent Debian kernels have removed the embedded ROM from qla2xxx 
(arguably good, since it's officially deprecated anyway), which requires 
that /lib/firmware/ql2200_fw.bin exist before it can initialize my Qlogic 
2200 FC cards.  Of course, that dir doesn't exist in the initramfs...

The qla2xxx driver gets loaded during the initramfs, but it's completely 
non-functional.  I need to manually remove it and re-insert it after 
booting (since /lib/firmware exists in the full userland) before the driver 
will actually work.

It'd be very, very nice if mkinitramfs would just drop the contents 
of /lib/firmware into the initramfs.  As driver firmware migrates out of 
the kernel and into userland, this sort of problem may become more 
common...

-- 
Mike Shuey


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Preparing linux-2.6 2.6.18-1

2006-10-02 Thread Nathanael Nerode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 02:15:54PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Change this policy.  You really must make two exceptions:
>> (1) Removal of material which Debian cannot legally distribute, if
>> upstream insists on keeping it.
>> (2) Removal of material which does not satisfy the DFSG, if
>> upstream insists on keeping it.
> 
> Indeed, this should be another topic for the next kernel-team meeting.
> 
> 
>> One piece of "broken functionality" is loading firmware before the
>> root partition is mounted -- the lack of this breaks netbooting on the
>> boards which need the firmware.  However, I can't do anything about this:
>> it requires running udev in the initramfs.  This problem is not specific
>> to this driver.
> 
> the needed functionality is provided by the initramfs-hook in the
> firmware-nonfree package, which makes sure the firmware.agent from udev
> is present in the initramfs too.

Rocking!  I didn't know that was ready.

>> A second piece of "broken functionality" is the functionality provided
>> by the firmware: if the firmware isn't there and isn't loaded, the 
>> functionality isn't there.  Duh.  I also can't do anything about this.
> 
> Which functionality? TSO? 

I believe so.

>>> Then, firmware-loading support in d-i is still missing, this issue
>>> should be be fixed too before we consider the patch.
>> Firmware loading support patches are being refused in d-i until after etch 
>> is released.  Therefore, this amounts to a "We will not accept any firmware 
>> loading patches until after we release etch" policy.  Good to know.  I can
>> still queue them up for you to commit afterwards, though.
> 
> if we want to release in time, we should indeed collect the patches for
> post-etch.

Excellent.

> 2.6.20 should be the target for the first patches, as the
> merge window for 2.6.19 will not be open long enough anymore, except for
> the dgrs removal.

Okey-dokey.

I'm all happy now.  :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIbuSRGZ0aC4lkIIRArC3AJ99p6DQhY20+vGAO0eIjsWwcHjMZACeNr85
j4rC2towsqrguFtUIuiMc+4=
=5aGE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Preparing linux-2.6 2.6.18-1

2006-10-02 Thread Nathanael Nerode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:30:34PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> I emailed the contact address at Intel about e100, but it seems to forward
>> to tech support.  We'll see if anything comes back.
> 
> what did you write them?

Tried to describe the problem in detail and asked for either source or a
distribution license which didn't require source.  Fool at the other
end said "It's licensed under GPL, so you don't need anything more"
(even though I *said* that didn't work in my email).  I told him "You're
wrong.  Please forward this to Intel's lawyers."

> IMHO, the topmost priority should be to get DFSG-free sources and an 
> in-tree build infrastructure for the firmwares, like the aic7xxx driver.
> 
> We should ask the vendors to relicense the blob and implement 
> request_firmware only if they strictly refuse to provide sources. 
> 
> It also would be interesting to know if the blobs are actually code or 
> register bank settings, as they don't need to be removed in the latter 
> case, not being software at all.
> 
> Maybe we should prepare a document template which we can send to all
> vendors, listing the reasons for our actions and possible actions we see
> they could take, everything in a friendly legalese so we can expect a
> real answer.

We should.  I've had such bad luck that I suggest someone else write the
template.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIbwnRGZ0aC4lkIIRAkVMAJ9hyCXGFWAsAKToY1bXuevfaxvm8gCeIp1X
FSGVya7Z10aARlLz1B+OYRw=
=mOI0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Preparing linux-2.6 2.6.18-1

2006-10-02 Thread Nathanael Nerode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 05:55:22AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>>> tg3 may follow, if there is
>>> a good enough patch to do it nicely. This may come, either from someone like
>>> you (but the patch has to be upstream-quality, which apparently your patch 
>>> was
>>> not),
>> Yes, it was upstream-quality.  (Although to be honest the *driver* is
>> pretty ugly stuff.)  There was one bug spotted by Herbert Xu and fixed
>> by him.
> 
> This is not the opinion of others of the kernel team who looked at it.

Name one specific problem with it, or stop slandering it.

Really.  Seriously.  I've never gotten an actual technical criticism,
besides the ones I mentioned before, which are all problems with
firmware loading in general, and not problems with my patch itself.
I'd be happy to fix any actual problems, but I can't fix mythical
problems which nobody is willing to describe.

The code *is* ugly.  It's ugly because the upstream code is ugly --
nearly the whole driver is in a spinlock.  I'm not up to rewriting the
entire driver to increase lock granularity: that requires an extremely
detailed understanding of the hardware and driver.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFFIcY0RGZ0aC4lkIIRAngFAJ91LnvcBaFsz4XqvYTkFrWbZXRbHwCXVQXI
1tNQYIBlsz4OFrhL78uP5A==
=Y6s8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]