[bts-link] source package linux-2.6
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #464501 # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9871 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEW usertags 464501 + status-NEW # remote status report for #534422 # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEW usertags 534422 + status-NEW thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521548: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64: laptop toshiba qosmio g30 fails to boot with 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 kernels
I have started each script by hand and hal script (rc2.d) triggers the bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#488022: New findings
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 01:35:32PM -0700, Sean wrote: Christian, According to this PDF, if you are getting Waiting for root file system on bootup, IT821X IDE support needs to be hardcoded into the kernel, as opposed to a kernel module. CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IT821X=y. Changing this parameter works for me on a later kernel. http://www.compactpc.com.tw/drivers/ebox-2300SX/Vortex86SX_Linux_HowTo.pdf just use the rootdelay=9 or whatever bootparam, there is no need to recompile your linux image. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518467: linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64: bluetooth mouse stutters since kernel upgrade
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoffj...@inutil.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:14:08PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:08:30PM +0100, pHilipp Zabel wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:04 PM, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote: On Fri, 06 Mar 2009, pHilipp Zabel wrote: On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:41:25PM +0100, pHilipp Zabel wrote: ** Tainted: P M (17) You have a proprietary module loaded, we don't support kernels in this state. Also the kernel logged machine checks, aka low level hardware errors, which often shows serious hardware problems. Bastian I installed mcelog, changed the video driver from fglrx to vesa and rebooted, same result. (/var/log/mcelog is empty.) could you test if 2.6.29-rc7 trunk builds fix it for you: see apt line http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel The problem persists. 2.6.26-1 works, 2.6.28-1 and 2.6.29-rc7 don't. Here is a log of the evdev output and a hcidump. The delays already appear in the hcidump: ok i see, please report upstream with this dump on bugzilla.kernel.org and let us know the bug number. thanks a lot for quick reaction Philipp, did you report this upstream or has the problem been resolved by a more recent version? Oh, I completely forgot about that. The same problem was reported upstream by Anthony Waters: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13314 It is still not resolved in the 2.6.30-1 kernel. regards Philipp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: bug 518467 is forwarded to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13314
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 518467 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13314 Bug #518467 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64: bluetooth mouse stutters since kernel upgrade Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13314'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521778: regression: errors from dvd drive
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 14:39 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:06:05AM -0400, Jerry Quinn wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.29-1 Severity: normal I just upgraded to 2.6.29-1 and rebooted, then found tons of errors like: Mar 29 20:32:20 cerberus kernel: [8.247470] sr 0:0:0:1: [sr0] Unhandled sense code Mar 29 20:32:20 cerberus kernel: [8.247472] sr 0:0:0:1: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE,SUGGEST_RETRY Mar 29 20:32:20 cerberus kernel: [8.247475] sr 0:0:0:1: [sr0] Sense Key : No Sense [current] Mar 29 20:32:20 cerberus kernel: [8.247478] sr 0:0:0:1: [sr0] Add. Sense: No additional sense information Mar 29 20:32:20 cerberus kernel: [8.247481] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 196592 in my kernel log. Does this message still appear with 2.6.30 from unstable? I'm running 2.6.29-2 right now and haven't seen the message reappear. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [stable] Adding bnx2x driver in 5.0.3
Hello dann, On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:04 PM, dann frazierda...@debian.org wrote: The bnx2x driver was disabled in lenny due to its use of non-free firmware. I have put together a patch that would reenable this driver in lenny's 2.6.26 kernel, making use of the firmware split-out patch that has gone upstream in Linux 2.6.31-rc releases (and is currently in use in the linux-2.6 2.6.30 packages in sid). Really good news :-) I'd like to see if we can enable the use of this driver in 5.0.3. As far as I can tell, the necessary steps would be: - Update the kernel (obviously) - planned for a p-u upload this week - Backport the necessary changes for firmware-nonfree from sid to add the firmware-bnx2x package - Update kernel-wedge/stable to include bnx2x if available (are there space issues here?) The space usage is neglitable and I think it can be done with a very small risk of regressions. Be sure to use the kernel-wedge of lenny for building it since we've changed kernel-wedge a lot during the 2.6.30 migration and it is not suitable for the lenny usage. - Update d-i in 5.0.3 to incorporate this driver Yes, you got the picture right. I offer help if required. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
linux-modules-contrib-2.6 REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the linux-modules-contrib-2.6 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.6.26-3+lenny1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk # 20090725 The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538332: linux-2.6: [x86] Null pointer dereference in hrtick_start_fair.
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 10:24 -0700, dann frazier wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:33:38PM -0700, Alok Kataria wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: Debian 5.0r2 Hi, There was a regression on mainline kernel due to my patches for tsc unification. It seems lenny has picked-up those unification patches but didn't pick the fix for that regression. Thanks for the report. Are you referring to the tsc_32/tsc_64 merge? We haven't included that for lenny and there aren't currently any plans to. Yep that is what I was referring to. Its strange that the bug I am seeing is so similar to the one reported in that commit. Maybe something else is causing this panic it seems let me see if I can get to the bottom of it. The fixes for #524542 that I have in the abi branch use the pre-merge version from Ubuntu. I see, though I must say that its really confusing for a person like me, I had assume that kernel version 2.6.26 will have all the stuff from the vanilla tree, but it seems you do things differently. If you're referring to something else, please let me know.. I checked sources for Debian5 5.0r2 and its missing the fix. The commit details for the fix are commit 3d0decc4f49e8645cd6369b02ed076bebd3d61ad Author: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu Date: Fri Jul 11 15:09:15 2008 +0200 x86: fix tsc unification buglet with ftrace and stackprotector Please include it in the next security update. If you believe this has security implifications, I'd suggest bringing it up on the oss-security list so that it gets tracked as such. I didn't mean it has security implication, just that the fix should be picked up for next update. But let me check what is wrong here, for now no need to apply this fix. Moritz, you may want to hold the svn update it seems TSC unification was not done for your tree. Thanks, Alok We have seen null pointer de-reference in hrtick_start_fair during bootup, similar to one mentioned in the commit details. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538332: linux-2.6: [x86] Null pointer dereference in hrtick_start_fair.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:32:44AM -0700, Alok Kataria wrote: On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 10:24 -0700, dann frazier wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:33:38PM -0700, Alok Kataria wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: Debian 5.0r2 Hi, There was a regression on mainline kernel due to my patches for tsc unification. It seems lenny has picked-up those unification patches but didn't pick the fix for that regression. Thanks for the report. Are you referring to the tsc_32/tsc_64 merge? We haven't included that for lenny and there aren't currently any plans to. Yep that is what I was referring to. Its strange that the bug I am seeing is so similar to the one reported in that commit. Maybe something else is causing this panic it seems let me see if I can get to the bottom of it. Cool, thanks for helping us here. The fixes for #524542 that I have in the abi branch use the pre-merge version from Ubuntu. I see, though I must say that its really confusing for a person like me, I had assume that kernel version 2.6.26 will have all the stuff from the vanilla tree, but it seems you do things differently. We may still be talking about two different things. We are based upon the vanilla 2.6.26 tree, but the tsc merging didn't appear to happen unil 2.6.27-rc1. Specifically, the tsc.c file was introduced here: commit 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 Author: Alok Kataria akata...@vmware.com Date: Tue Jul 1 11:43:18 2008 -0700 x86: merge sched_clock handling Move the basic global variable definitions and sched_clock handling in the common tsc.c file. - Unify notsc kernel command line handling for 32 bit and 64bit. - Functional changes for 64bit. - tsc_disabled is updated if notsc is passed at boottime. - Fallback to jiffies for sched_clock, incase notsc is passed on commandline. Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria akata...@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Dan Hecht dhe...@vmware.com Cc: Dan Hecht dhe...@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu da...@krebs:~/git/linux-2.6$ git name-rev 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 tags/v2.6.27-rc1~1102^2~72 -dann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#488022: New findings
Thanks for the tip, but I just tried rootdelay=9. It does not help on the Vortex86SX. Sean maximilian attems wrote: On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 01:35:32PM -0700, Sean wrote: Christian, According to this PDF, if you are getting Waiting for root file system on bootup, IT821X IDE support needs to be hardcoded into the kernel, as opposed to a kernel module. CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IT821X=y. Changing this parameter works for me on a later kernel. http://www.compactpc.com.tw/drivers/ebox-2300SX/Vortex86SX_Linux_HowTo.pdf just use the rootdelay=9 or whatever bootparam, there is no need to recompile your linux image. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#488022: New findings
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:04:18PM -0700, Sean wrote: Thanks for the tip, but I just tried rootdelay=9. It does not help on the Vortex86SX. please provide more information: - dmesg of working boot also boot log of not working boot is interesting. did you try 2.6.30 linux images? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#523503: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 16)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:37:24 +0200 with message-id 20090727203724.ga20...@galadriel.inutil.org and subject line Re: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 16 seems to be solved by using kernel 2.6.29 has caused the Debian Bug report #523503, regarding kernel-image-2.6: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 16 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 523503: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=523503 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: kernel-image-2.6 Version: linux-image Severity: normal Since two weeks I get a kernel oops message and dmesg shows the following information: snip - [6.632957] Unbalanced enable for IRQ 16 [6.632999] [ cut here ] [6.633038] WARNING: at kernel/irq/manage.c:158 enable_irq+0x3a/0x56() [6.633083] Modules linked in: usbhid hid ff_memless uhci_hcd(+) floppy ohci1394(+) ahci(+) jmicron(+) ieee1394 libata r8169 ide_core scsi_mod dock ehci_hcd thermal processor fan thermal_sys [6.633692] Pid: 783, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 [6.633731] [6.633732] Call Trace: [6.633805] [802349b8] warn_on_slowpath+0x51/0x7a [6.633844] [8023540d] printk+0x4e/0x56 [6.633884] [8023cf9f] try_to_del_timer_sync+0x51/0x5a [6.633925] [8021a826] lapic_next_event+0xf/0x13 [6.633964] [80428c7a] schedule_timeout+0x92/0xad [6.634004] [8023cc1c] process_timeout+0x0/0x5 [6.634043] [80428c6d] schedule_timeout+0x85/0xad [6.634083] [802127e5] native_read_tsc+0x8/0x18 [6.634123] [8023d0db] msleep+0x14/0x1e [6.634162] [8026c629] enable_irq+0x3a/0x56 [6.634210] [a005f602] :ide_core:ide_probe_port+0x4cf/0x4e1 [6.634258] [a005ff86] :ide_core:ide_device_add_all+0x209/0x5e4 [6.634306] [a006038b] :ide_core:ide_device_add+0x2a/0x2f [6.634348] [a00c] :ahci:ahci_init_one+0x125/0xa69 [6.634395] [a0061ace] :ide_core:ide_setup_pci_device+0x3c/0x45 [6.634436] [8032858f] pci_match_device+0x18/0xad [6.634476] [80328759] pci_device_probe+0xa9/0xf8 [6.634516] [80384fd4] driver_probe_device+0xd0/0x14d [6.634556] [80385097] __driver_attach+0x46/0x6d [6.634596] [80385051] __driver_attach+0x0/0x6d [6.634634] [80384777] bus_for_each_dev+0x44/0x6f [6.634674] [80384bad] bus_add_driver+0xb4/0x203 [6.634714] [80231a39] check_preempt_wakeup+0xbd/0xe9 [6.634754] [803852f3] driver_register+0x8d/0x101 [6.634794] [803289bd] __pci_register_driver+0x47/0x7a [6.636952] [80255067] sys_init_module+0x190e/0x1aa4 [6.636952] [80324c3d] pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x0/0x82 [6.636952] [8020beca] system_call_after_swapgs+0x8a/0x8f [6.636952] [6.636952] ---[ end trace efd39fbcde4bec5b ]--- snap - This message appears not at every system boot and I cant detect some misfunction until yet. I dont have change the configuration but I update my system via aptitude safe-upgrade every two days. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 2.6.29-1 On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 02:09:34PM +0200, Axel Ludszuweit wrote: No, after using kernel 2.6.29 this behavoiur does not appear anymore. Thanks, closing the bug, then. Cheers, Moritz ---End Message---
Processed: reassign 538898 to linux-2.6, forcibly merging 538898 538159
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 538898 linux-2.6 Bug #538898 [installation-reports] Squeeze install hangs at Setting console to Unicode Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'linux-2.6'. Bug #538898 [linux-2.6] Squeeze install hangs at Setting console to Unicode Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #538898 to the same values previously set Bug #538898 [linux-2.6] Squeeze install hangs at Setting console to Unicode Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #538898 to the same values previously set forcemerge 538898 538159 Bug#538898: Squeeze install hangs at Setting console to Unicode Bug#538159: CONFIG_X86_PAT=y breaks bogl-bterm, d-i Forcibly Merged 538159 538898. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538332: linux-2.6: [x86] Null pointer dereference in hrtick_start_fair.
I see, though I must say that its really confusing for a person like me, I had assume that kernel version 2.6.26 will have all the stuff from the vanilla tree, but it seems you do things differently. We may still be talking about two different things. We are based upon the vanilla 2.6.26 tree, but the tsc merging didn't appear to happen unil 2.6.27-rc1. Specifically, the tsc.c file was introduced here: commit 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 Author: Alok Kataria akata...@vmware.com Date: Tue Jul 1 11:43:18 2008 -0700 x86: merge sched_clock handling Move the basic global variable definitions and sched_clock handling in the common tsc.c file. - Unify notsc kernel command line handling for 32 bit and 64bit. - Functional changes for 64bit. - tsc_disabled is updated if notsc is passed at boottime. - Fallback to jiffies for sched_clock, incase notsc is passed on commandline. Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria akata...@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Dan Hecht dhe...@vmware.com Cc: Dan Hecht dhe...@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu da...@krebs:~/git/linux-2.6$ git name-rev 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 tags/v2.6.27-rc1~1102^2~72 Okay. I was looking at -bash-3.2$ git describe 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 v2.6.26-rc9-715-g0ef9553 Which made me think that it should be in the 2.6.26 vanilla release, but I think git-describe shows the time-frame when it hit Ingo's tip tree. That seemed to have confused me. Alok -dann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538332: linux-2.6: [x86] Null pointer dereference in hrtick_start_fair.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 02:06:34PM -0700, Alok Kataria wrote: I see, though I must say that its really confusing for a person like me, I had assume that kernel version 2.6.26 will have all the stuff from the vanilla tree, but it seems you do things differently. We may still be talking about two different things. We are based upon the vanilla 2.6.26 tree, but the tsc merging didn't appear to happen unil 2.6.27-rc1. Specifically, the tsc.c file was introduced here: commit 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 Author: Alok Kataria akata...@vmware.com Date: Tue Jul 1 11:43:18 2008 -0700 x86: merge sched_clock handling Move the basic global variable definitions and sched_clock handling in the common tsc.c file. - Unify notsc kernel command line handling for 32 bit and 64bit. - Functional changes for 64bit. - tsc_disabled is updated if notsc is passed at boottime. - Fallback to jiffies for sched_clock, incase notsc is passed on commandline. Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria akata...@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Dan Hecht dhe...@vmware.com Cc: Dan Hecht dhe...@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu da...@krebs:~/git/linux-2.6$ git name-rev 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 tags/v2.6.27-rc1~1102^2~72 Okay. I was looking at -bash-3.2$ git describe 0ef95533326a7b37d16025af9edc0c18e644b346 v2.6.26-rc9-715-g0ef9553 Which made me think that it should be in the 2.6.26 vanilla release, but I think git-describe shows the time-frame when it hit Ingo's tip tree. That seemed to have confused me. Ah, ok - that makes sense. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519984: Cannot boot 2.6.26 kernel on HPPA N4000
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:39:22AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: Moritz, thanks for forwarding... On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 04:10:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Attempting to boot a 2.6.26 kernel on an HP N4000 machine (64 bit PA-RISC) yields the following results (beginning at system startup): Beginning of error ... Elroy version TR3.0 (0x4) found at 0xfecf4000 PCI: Address space collision on region 0 of device :d0:00.0 [70e0800:70e08ff] ... sym53c8xx :d0:00.0: enabling device ( - 0003) sym53c8xx :d0:00.0: enabling SERR and PARITY (0003 - 0143) * SYSTEM ALERT ** ... 0x187000FF6292 - type 0 = Data Field Unused 0x5800187000FF6292 6D02 100F120F - type 11 = Timestamp 03/16/2009 The address space collision is likely the cause of this HPMC. (0xff6292 == HPMC) With HPMC's, PIM info is worth collecting. See http://www.parisc-linux.org/faq/kernelbug-howto.html for details on how to collect PIM info. It would also be helpful to collect in io output from the same PDC prompt that allows one to run ser pim and clearpim. Lastly, if an older kernel does boot, lspci -v would be helpful. Is this a known issue, has it been fixed in current kernels from unstable? The parenting of resources in the generic PCI support has been changed. I can't say if it fixes this problem. Is it possible to test a 2.6.30 or 2.6.31-rc kernel? That will be difficult for the bug submitter, since the current versions of the debian installer are not yet based on 2.6.30 AFAICT. However, maybe the PCI card, which causes the collision can be temporarily removed, so that the installation proceeds. After that, the 2.6.30 kernel from unstable could be installed and the PCI card re-plugged in. Marc, would you be able to test this? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#475055: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: SectorIdNotFound - Hidden Protected Area after resume
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:24:09PM +0200, IhacWorX wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-5
Severity: important
When resuming vom ACPI S3 (I use s2ram to make the machine fall
asleep), my Thinkpad X31 only spits out on the console
-- snip
hda: task_out_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: task_out_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound },
LBAsect=75165199, sector=75165199
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
-- snap
which is repeated until I turn off the machine. Further logins or
running programs is impossible, so I have to turn the machine off/
reboot it.
The hard drive of this computer uses a Hidden Protected Area - this
feature seems to be connected with the error message above (at least
ThinkWiki says so, cf. http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/
Problems_with_ACPI_suspend-to-ram, last entry there).
The problem went away with linux-image-2.6.22-3-686, but
unfortunately it reappeared when I upgraded to
linux-image-2.6.24-1-686.
Does this error still show up with more recent kernels?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#467291: ide-scsi module not compiled into production kernel 2.6.18-6-686
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 01:44:25PM +, Tony van der Hoff wrote: Package: kernel Severity: important The ide-scsi module is not compiled into the production kernel. Whilst Linus may deprecate it for CD-burning, it is absolutely essential for IDE tape drives, because ide-tape is flaky, and has been unmaintained for years (Primarily bug 327355 appears to have remained unresolved, but there are other problems). Please make this module avalable in future kernels. ide-tape has seen lots of commits over the recent year. Are their specific problems not yet addressed? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#485857: sfs / 2.6.28-git5
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:51:29AM +, Clint Adams wrote: With 2.6.28-git5 the problem is not reproducible with the steps described in the original report, but still occurs under other circumstances (which I do not have a simple testcase for, but which work fine under 2.6.18). Does it still show up with 2.6.30? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#482382: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: System locks up if I copy data to my USB2-HDD
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Bachert wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.2 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** If I copy massive data to my USB2-HDD the System completely hangs after a while. This does not occur with 2.6.18 Kernel. m...@matthias:~$ lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 03) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev 03) 00:04.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02) 00:04.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) 00:04.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01) 00:04.3 Bridge: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02) 00:09.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43) 00:09.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43) 00:09.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 04) 00:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 07) 00:0a.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! Game Port (rev 07) 00:0b.0 Mass storage controller: Promise Technology, Inc. 20269 (rev 02) 00:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) 00:0d.0 Multimedia controller: Philips Semiconductors SAA7146 (rev 01) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G550 AGP (rev 01) Did you upgrade to Lenny in the mean time? Does the error still show up with Lenny? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518995: kernel: RAM recognition
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:45:09PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009, pawel wrote: Package: kernel Severity: normal system don't recognize more than 895MB of system memory (physical) - i must install kernel with bigmem; when i've added next 2GB RAM, system still have seen 895MB RAM Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash how about posting dmesg, so aboves is proved. can you please test 2.6.28 , see sid snapshot line - http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel Pawel? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519040: linux-headers-2.6.28-1-686: depends on linux-kbuild but not available
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:25:00AM +0200, Mark Niven wrote: Package: linux-headers-2.6.28-1-686 Severity: normal Depends on linux-kbuild-2.6.28 which is still not available a week after the 2.6.28 kernel images. As a result the new kernel remains unusable for me as it is not possible (easy ?) to rebuild kernel modules for it. I realise it is just a matter of time, but when? Or am I missing something else obvious? Thnak you. Closing, matching kbuild package is available. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518344: [linux-source-2.6.28] hang on shutdown after acpid exiting
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:18:36AM -0400, Brent S. Elmer wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 13:11 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: On Thu, 05 Mar 2009, Brent S. Elmer wrote: Package: linux-source-2.6.28 Version: 2.6.28-1 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I am running a squeeze box except for I just built a 2.6.28 kernel from sid. When I shutdown while running the 2.6.28 kernel, the computer hangs indefinitely. The last line that displays on the shutdown screen is acpid exiting. I let it sit for 45 minutes and it never finished shutting down. I have to power off the computer. When I power on the computer, there don't appear to be any problems on startup. If I boot to the old 2.6.26 kernel I built and had been running prior to the 2.6.28 kernel, the shutdown is fine. I don't see any obvious problems in the syslog. I am running on an IBM Thinkpad T42p. I built a 2.6.28 kernel for my desktop at home and have not noticed the problem on shutdown. can you try latest snapshot, maybe 2.6.28.7 fixed that? see sid apt lines http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel All that I see for linux-source is 2.6.29. I tried building 2.6.29 but the latest fglrx fails to build for 2.6.29. I use fglrx since I have an ati video card and it seems to work better for me. I can't tell for sure but it seems like the lockup on shutdown may only occur when wireless is on in Network manager. Even though I am connected to the network wired and not wireless. I have an atheros ar5212 wireless card which seems to be very flakey with network manager. That is one of the reasons I wanted to try 2.6.28 because of the wireless improvements. The lockup on shutdown doesn't happen 100% of the time. It is probably 85-90% of the time. Can you test with the 2.6.30 kernels from unstable, please? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#310786: marked as done (Debian Sarge ver. 17-05-2005, Bad: scheduling while atomic!, whe Iuse 8021q)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:38:28 +0200 with message-id 20090727223828.ga2...@galadriel.inutil.org and subject line Re: Debian Sarge ver. 17-05-2005, Bad: scheduling while atomic!, whe Iuse 8021q has caused the Debian Bug report #310786, regarding Debian Sarge ver. 17-05-2005, Bad: scheduling while atomic!, whe Iuse 8021q to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 310786: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310786 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: kernel-image Version: 2.6.8-2-386 Debian: testing Sorry, now I attached the files -Mensaje original- De: Ard van Breemen [mailto:a...@kwaak.net] Enviado el: miércoles, 25 de mayo de 2005 11:07 Para: Victor Riquelme Durán; 310...@bugs.debian.org CC: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-...@packages.debian.org Asunto: Re: Bug#310734: RV: Debian Sarge ver. 17-05-2005, Bad: scheduling while atomic!, whe Iuse 8021q reassign 310734 kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386 thanks This is apparently a kernel bug not related to the vlan userspace package. Regards, Ard van Breemen ** Hello, I am Victor uname ar - Linux firewall 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Mon Jan 24 03:01:58 EST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Excuse me, but I am new in Debian and I don't know where I can send this question. When I activate the 8021q (vlan), Debian Sarge show me the following log in console, after I press any keys or the system execute some action: 1) Ip link set eth4 up 2) insmod /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/kernel/net/8021q/8021q.ko 3) vconfig add 318 eth4 4) ip link set eth4.318 up Then some the following error : Bad: scheduling while atomic! [c024d1e0] schedule+0x3c/0x3e6 [c010401c] default_idle+0x0/0x26 [c01040a1] cpu_idle+0x30/0x32 [c0308642] start_kernel+0x18e/0x192 I have attached the /var/log/messages and /var/log/kernel Thank for any answer. Victor Riquelme Durán vrique...@ctr.cl May 24 11:27:21 firewall kernel: klogd 1.4.1#16, log source = /proc/kmsg started. May 24 11:27:21 firewall kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.6.8-2-386 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Loaded 28170 symbols from /boot/System.map-2.6.8-2-386. May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Symbols match kernel version 2.6.8. May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernel modules not enabled. May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: 7f1 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: FADT (v001 Intel L440GX 0x06040001 INT 0x000f4242) @ 0x1b32 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: MADT (v001 Intel N440BX 0x06040001 TNI 0x) @ 0x1ba6 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: DSDT (v001 Intel L440GX0 0x06040001 MSFT 0x010b) @ 0x May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0xc08 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x01] enabled) May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Processor #1 6:8 APIC version 17 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1]) May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x00] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0]) May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: IOAPIC[0]: Assigned apic_id 0 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 0, version 17, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 high edge) May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level) May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: IRQ0 used by override. May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: IRQ2 used by override. May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Built 1 zonelists May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda1 ro May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Initializing CPU#0 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: PID hash table entries: 2048 (order 11: 16384 bytes) May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Detected 796.686 MHz processor. May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Using pmtmr for high-res timesource May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 7, 524288 bytes) May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel: Inode-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) May 24 11:27:22 firewall kernel:
Bug#344791: marked as done (Problem with pcmcia fixed disk )
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:43:06 +0200
with message-id 20090727224306.ga10...@galadriel.inutil.org
and subject line Re: Problem with pcmcia fixed disk
has caused the Debian Bug report #344791,
regarding Problem with pcmcia fixed disk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
344791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=344791
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-6
When I insert a pcmcia fixed ide disk, I get the following messages in
/var/log/syslog. I have also compiled a 2.6.14.3 and get the same
problem. All is working well with 2.6.12 debian kernel, and
2.4.17 recompiled.
The pcmcia system was tested with different combination of pcmcia-cs,
pcmciautils, hotplug, udev giving the same phenomena.
The pcmcia system is working for a wifi card.
Dec 25 22:40:06 localhost kernel: hdc: probing with STATUS(0x50) instead of
ALTSTATUS(0xaa)
Dec 25 22:40:06 localhost kernel: hdc: IBM-DJSA-220, ATA DISK drive
Dec 25 22:40:06 localhost kernel: hdd: probing with STATUS(0x50) instead of
ALTSTATUS(0xaa)
Dec 25 22:40:07 localhost kernel: hdd: probing with STATUS(0x51) instead of
ALTSTATUS(0xaa)
Dec 25 22:40:07 localhost kernel: ide1 at 0xa1f0-0xa1f7,0xa3f6 on irq 3
Dec 25 22:40:07 localhost kernel: hdc: max request size: 128KiB
Dec 25 22:40:37 localhost kernel: hdc: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady
SeekComplete }
Dec 25 22:40:37 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xf8
Dec 25 22:40:37 localhost kernel: hdc: Host Protected Area detected.
Dec 25 22:40:37 localhost kernel: ^Icurrent capacity is 39070080 sectors (20003
MB)
Dec 25 22:40:37 localhost kernel: ^Inative capacity is 138411840 sectors
(70866 MB)
Dec 25 22:41:07 localhost kernel: hdc: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady
SeekComplete }
Dec 25 22:41:07 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xf9 25 22:41:07
localhost kernel: hdc: Host Protected Area disabled.
Dec 25 22:41:07 localhost kernel: hdc: 134217729 sectors (68719 MB) w/1874KiB
Cache, CHS=65535/16/63
Dec 25 22:41:07 localhost kernel: hdc: cache flushes not supported
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: hdc:hdc: irq timeout: status=0x58 {
DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: hdc: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady
SeekComplete DataRequest }
.
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: hdc: drive not ready for command
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: ide1: reset: master: error (0x00?)
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdc,
sector 0
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: Buffer I/O error on device hdc,
logical block
0
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdc,
sector 1
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: Buffer I/O error on device hdc,
logical block
1
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdc,
sector 2
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: Buffer I/O error on device hdc,
logical block
2
.
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: unable to read partition table
Dec 25 22:41:17 localhost kernel: ide-cs: hdc: Vcc = 5.0, Vpp = 12.0
I'm using a debian testing and libc6 2.3.5-8
Thanks.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:23:07AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:26:22PM +0100, Alain Prignet wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-6
When I insert a pcmcia fixed ide disk, I get the following messages in
/var/log/syslog. I have also compiled a 2.6.14.3 and get the same
problem. All is working well with 2.6.12 debian kernel, and
2.4.17 recompiled.
The pcmcia system was tested with different combination of pcmcia-cs,
pcmciautils, hotplug, udev giving the same phenomena.
The pcmcia system is working for a wifi card.
Does this error still occur with more recent kernel versions?
If you're running Etch, could you try to reproduce this bug
with the 2.6.24 based kernel added in 4.0r4?
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.24.html
No further feedback, closing the bug.
If anyone reencounters the problem, please reopen this bug.
Cheers,
Moritz
---End Message---
Bug#488534: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: No agpgart after upgrade)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:46:25 +0200 with message-id 20090727224625.ga20...@galadriel.inutil.org and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: No agpgart after upgrade has caused the Debian Bug report #488534, regarding linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: No agpgart after upgrade to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 488534: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488534 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 Version: 2.6.25-6 Severity: important I just updated to the latest version of 2.6.25-2 and rebooted. Having done so, I can't start X. THe X server dies because it can't open /dev/agpgart and falls back to framebuffer which then also fails. Here's the chunk of kernel log: Jun 29 10:50:04 cerberus kernel: [ 14.190689] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 Jun 29 10:50:04 cerberus kernel: [ 14.198026] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:02.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16 Jun 29 10:50:04 cerberus kernel: [ 14.198031] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:02.0 to 64 Jun 29 10:50:04 cerberus kernel: [ 14.198040] [drm:drm_fill_in_dev] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Jun 29 10:50:04 cerberus kernel: [ 14.198043] DRM: Fill_in_dev failed. Jun 29 10:50:04 cerberus kernel: [ 14.198045] ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :00:02.0 disabled -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.25-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.25-6) (m...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23)) #1 SMP Fri Jun 27 00:16:12 UTC 2008 ** Command line: root=/dev/md0 ro quiet ** Not tainted ** Kernel log: [1.504582] ata5: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2...@0xf3206000 port 0xf3206300 irq 1277 [1.504584] ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2...@0xf3206000 port 0xf3206380 irq 1277 [1.596113] usb 2-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [1.599000] usb 2-1: New USB device found, idVendor=03f0, idProduct=8604 [1.599002] usb 2-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 [1.599004] usb 2-1: Product: Deskjet 5400 series [1.599005] usb 2-1: Manufacturer: HP [1.599006] usb 2-1: SerialNumber: TH58N111RN04JH [1.543369] input: Kensington Kensington USB/PS2 Wheel Mouse as /class/input/input2 [1.560177] input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.10 Mouse [Kensington Kensington USB/PS2 Wheel Mouse] on usb-:00:1a.0-1 [1.560197] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid [1.560200] drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c: v2.6:USB HID core driver [1.744130] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) [1.748122] ata1.00: HPA detected: current 490232639, native 490234752 [1.748122] ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD2500YS-01SHB1, 20.06C06, max UDMA/133 [1.748122] ata1.00: 490232639 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) [1.628118] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 [1.808133] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) [1.648119] ata2.00: ATA-7: WDC WD2500YS-01SHB1, 20.06C06, max UDMA/133 [1.648119] ata2.00: 490234752 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) [1.812126] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133 [1.856137] ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) [1.900140] ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) [1.664120] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500YS-01S 20.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [1.664120] scsi 1:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500YS-01S 20.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [1.666855] Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver [1.666857] ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx [1.667856] JMB: IDE controller (0x197b:0x2368 rev 0x00) at PCI slot :02:00.0 [1.667878] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :02:00.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16 [1.667884] JMB: 100% native mode on irq 16 [1.667892] ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc400-0xc407, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:PIO [1.667903] ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc408-0xc40f, BIOS settings: hdc:PIO, hdd:PIO [1.667912] Probing IDE interface ide0... [1.922713] Driver 'sd' needs updating - please use bus_type methods [1.922768] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 490232639 512-byte hardware sectors (250999 MB) [1.922777] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off [1.922779] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 [1.922793] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA [1.922829] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 490232639 512-byte hardware sectors (250999 MB) [1.922837] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off [1.922839] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00
Bug#488253: marked as done (linux-image-2.6-amd64: Kernel general protection fault on x64 systems)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:44:56 +0200 with message-id 20090727224456.ga15...@galadriel.inutil.org and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6-amd64: Kernel general protection fault on x64 systems has caused the Debian Bug report #488253, regarding linux-image-2.6-amd64: Kernel general protection fault on x64 systems to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 488253: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488253 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64 Version: 2.6.18+6etch3 Severity: important Using the latest debian kernel on smp 64bit systems we can see random general protection fault: [11] SMP stack traces. This is always related to high nfsv3 traffic (e.g. imap or pop3 services). I attach some stack traces samples of three different x64 IBM 3550 machines. Keep in mind that after these stack traces the machine is unstable and after some time its kernel is going to be crash. Another hint is that if you try to reboot the machine you always get this stack trace followed by a kernel crash. I would be grateful if i can send you any feedback. Thanks, general protection fault: [11] SMP CPU 2 Modules linked in: xt_state nfsd exportfs iptable_nat ip_nat ip_conntrack nfnetlink ipt_LOG xt_limit xt_tcpudp iptable_filter iptable_mangle ip_tables x_tables button ac battery nfs lockd nfs_ acl sunrpc bonding dm_snapshot dm_mirror dm_mod loop i2c_i801 i2c_core shpchp pcspkr pci_hotplug evdev joydev ext3 jbd mbcache usbhid ide_cd cdrom generic sd_mod e1000 bnx2 piix ide_core uhci_ hcd ehci_hcd aacraid scsi_mod thermal processor fan Pid: 18744, comm: popper Not tainted 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 RIP: 0010:[881ec955] [881ec955] :nfs:nfs_complete_unlink+0x10/0x97 RSP: :81011636beb8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 8101557ae770 RBX: 77ac070c RCX: 8101660c5dc8 RDX: RSI: 8101660c5d98 RDI: 81020fb34d80 RBP: 81020fb34d80 R08: R09: 8101660c5eb0 R10: 0008 R11: 881e44f4 R12: 8101660c5d98 R13: 81020fb34d80 R14: 810237e0ddc0 R15: FS: 2b0cf8392dd0() GS:8101fef752c0() knlGS: CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b CR2: 0041701b CR3: 000178bfb000 CR4: 06e0 Process popper (pid: 18744, threadinfo 81011636a000, task 8101557ae770) Stack: 8101660c5d98 81020fb34d80 8101660c5d98 881e4525 8101660c5d98 81020fb34d80 810140c49c80 8020c9c7 0008 0008 810140c49c80 80210a82 Call Trace: [881e4525] :nfs:nfs_dentry_iput+0x31/0x4f [8020c9c7] dput+0x135/0x153 [80210a82] __fput+0x148/0x16e [80221c08] filp_close+0x5c/0x64 [8021bd30] sys_close+0x88/0xa2 [80257c16] system_call+0x7e/0x83 Code: 48 3b 6b 10 74 0a 48 8b 1b 48 85 db 75 f2 eb 72 ff 83 98 01 RIP [881ec955] :nfs:nfs_complete_unlink+0x10/0x97 RSP 81011636beb8 - general protection fault: [11] SMP CPU 2 Modules linked in: xt_state nfsd exportfs iptable_nat ip_nat ip_conntrack nfnetlink ipt_LOG xt_limit xt_tcpudp iptable_filter iptable_mangle ip_tables x_tables button ac battery nfs lockd nfs_ acl sunrpc bonding dm_snapshot dm_mirror dm_mod loop i2c_i801 i2c_core shpchp pcspkr pci_hotplug evdev joydev ext3 jbd mbcache usbhid ide_cd cdrom generic sd_mod e1000 bnx2 piix ide_core uhci_ hcd ehci_hcd aacraid scsi_mod thermal processor fan Pid: 18744, comm: popper Not tainted 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 RIP: 0010:[881ec955] [881ec955] :nfs:nfs_complete_unlink+0x10/0x97 RSP: :81011636beb8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 8101557ae770 RBX: 77ac070c RCX: 8101660c5dc8 RDX: RSI: 8101660c5d98 RDI: 81020fb34d80 RBP: 81020fb34d80 R08: R09: 8101660c5eb0 R10: 0008 R11: 881e44f4 R12: 8101660c5d98 R13: 81020fb34d80 R14: 810237e0ddc0 R15: FS: 2b0cf8392dd0() GS:8101fef752c0() knlGS: CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b CR2: 0041701b CR3: 000178bfb000 CR4: 06e0 Process popper (pid: 18744, threadinfo 81011636a000, task 8101557ae770) Stack: 8101660c5d98 81020fb34d80 8101660c5d98 881e4525 8101660c5d98 81020fb34d80 810140c49c80 8020c9c7 0008 0008
Bug#334843: more details
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:19:10PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote: Hello, I installed udev, as it is supposed to be the thing to use with such kernel, and this cause the system to segfault too. So the hdparm fix helped to avoid the problem, but there is definitely something very wrong there. I was confused by your initial bug report, thought that it was related to the loading of ide modules, and was offering a work around. If you feel that was off-topic, please ignore it. I wonder what would cause that bug. As said before, I found this problem after an hardware change, the video card, with a video card that worked perfectly on another computer with the same arch (not the same motherboard, but the same system with the same software). I traced the failure at the hdparm init script and Aurelien was able to provide a workaround. But still there's something wrong, as shows udev failure. I find odd that I have some many ide modules loaded and I wonder if it may be part of the issue, but I have no clues. Tell me if there is further information I can provide. Is this still an issue with more recent kernels? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#333776: qt-x11-free build fails
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: notfound 326581 2.3.5-8 notfound 326581 2.3.5-8.1 unblock 341666 by 326581 unblock 341675 by 326581 retitle 326581 [hppa] glibc-2.3.5 lets python FTBFS found 333766 2.3.5-8 merge 333766 342545 thanks qt-x11-free's recent failure to build on hppa is apparently due to a glibc problem that was allegedly, but not actually, fixed in 2.3.5-8, or has since returned (presumably #326581 or something else that was thought fixed by building with gcc-3.4 on hppa). The message below has a link to an example of the build failure. This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug #326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7. (And it really was fixed, otherwise kdelibs4c2 wouldn't be in testing right now for hppa.) But it's back in 2.3.5-8; could this have to do with the fact that 2.3.5-7 was built (wrongly) with gcc-4.0, and 2.3.5-8 is the first version to build with gcc-3.4? Is still still an issue with Lenny or later? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#365349: Intermediate space requirements
On 17/07/09 at 14:28 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: [1]: Even this would currently make it impossible to build snapshots in the current setup, because the used machine have no additional free space. Hi Bastian, The kernel snapshots is a really useful service (which unfortunately isn't very well known inside Debian). Have you thought of using Debian hardware to build them? That doesn't sound like a totally insane idea to me. - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: bug 509338 is forwarded to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13849
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 509338 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13849 Bug #509338 [linux-2.6] NULL pointer dereference in psmouse Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13849'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#493540: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686-bigmem: fails to copy files/directories on USB storage media
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:06:29AM +0100, Stefan Oschkera wrote: How large's the USB media in question? Are you maybe running into limitations of the ancient FAT32 specs? The tested USB devices were two memory sticks - 1GB and 8GB - and an USB HDD with a capacity of 120GB. The files transferred were all smaller than 500MB each, the test directory showed only a few subdirectories - so everything should have been well within the specs of FAT32. I've looked through the upstream commits, but couldn't find something which directly relates to your problem. As a first data point, could you test 2.6.30 from unstable? Even if you run stable, it installs fine in Lenny. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#499297: Bug still present in latest versions
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:34:00AM +0300, Mihnea-Costin Grigore wrote: Using the latest version of the linux-image-2.6.26 available from sid, the bug is still present. Interestingly, I have the same kernel version on 4 machines and only two (the ones described above) exhibit this symptom. == (this is after 25 minutes of uptime): # ntpq -p remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter == ntp3.usv.ro .PPS.1 u 10 64 377 13.204 28586.5 6001.04 router.srb.alsy .GPS.1 u9 64 377 45.667 24600.1 3362.46 89.46.240.255 148.6.0.13 u 36 64 377 15.167 22827.6 3305.95 cache.alsys.ro .GPS.1 u 23 64 3772.258 24407.2 3327.12 # ntpq -c as ind assID status conf reach auth condition last_event cnt === 1 17366 9024 yes yes nonereject reachable 2 2 17367 9024 yes yes nonereject reachable 2 3 17368 9024 yes yes nonereject reachable 2 4 17369 9024 yes yes nonereject reachable 2 # grep ntpd /var/log/daemon.log Oct 22 10:04:53 Nomad ntpdate[4016]: step time server 195.234.188.3 offset 478.057462 sec Oct 22 10:04:55 Nomad ntpdate[4332]: step time server 195.234.188.3 offset 0.056862 sec Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4524]: ntpd 4.2@1.1520-o Wed Jul 16 12:36:24 UTC 2008 (1) Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4525]: precision = 1.000 usec Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4525]: Listening on interface #0 wildcard, 0.0.0.0#123 Disabled Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4525]: Listening on interface #1 wildcard, ::#123 Disabled Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4525]: Listening on interface #2 lo, ::1#123 Enabled Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4525]: Listening on interface #3 wlan0, Enabled Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4525]: Listening on interface #4 wlan0, Enabled Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4525]: Listening on interface #5 lo, 127.0.0.1#123 Enabled Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4525]: Listening on interface #6 wlan0, Enabled Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4525]: kernel time sync status 0040 Oct 22 10:05:03 Nomad ntpd[4525]: frequency initialized 0.000 PPM from /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift Oct 22 10:05:13 Nomad ntpd[4525]: synchronized to 84.247.32.1, stratum 1 Oct 22 10:05:13 Nomad ntpd[4525]: time reset +0.358263 s Oct 22 10:05:13 Nomad ntpd[4525]: kernel time sync status change 0001 Does this issue still appear with the final Lenny kernel? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538898: Squeeze install hangs at Setting console to Unicode
On Monday 27 July 2009, Felix Zielcke wrote: Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 22:11 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 14:29 -0500 schrieb David A. Greene: Boot of any install method freezes after the message Setting console to Unicode appears. Immediately prior to the message the screen flashes and all previous text disappears. Thus only the Setting console message is visible after the hanng. This is with an NVidia GTX 285 if that matters. I have the same problem with current daily amd64 and i386 with VMware Workstation Beta. The graphical installer works fine, just not text mode. Joey just told me to use nopat kernel option and it worked. If you want to get this fixed, the best thing is to file a bug against the kernel upstream in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#421780: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Kernel with ACPI + SMP + AC power plugged on sony vaio S4M really slow
Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org writes: On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:46:44PM -0400, Mark T.B. Carroll wrote: This looks a bit like a problem I've been having with 2.6.29-4 built from Debian's Linux source package. My SMP system can slow down a lot when the AC adaptor is plugged in. kacpid and kacpi_notify get very busy and when I type letters get missed. I enclose my kernel config and an extract from a minute's fussing in kern.log in case they help. I apologize if I am mistaken about the relevance of the enclosed. Is this still reprocible with 2.6.30? Huh, I've not yet managed to reproduce it with 2.6.30-3. I'm curious: did you have specific reason to suspect it had been fixed? (-: Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536036: Acknowledgement (linux-source-2.6.30: Freeze during operation of USB scanner)
Since upgrading to 2.6.30-3 I've not managed to reproduce this bug. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
