Bug#567468: domainname

2010-01-29 Thread Gabor Gombas
Hi,

IMHO you are confused: /proc/sys/kernel/domainname is the NIS domain name
and has nothing to do with DNS; in fact, the NIS domain can be different
from the DNS domain. Thus your script is doubly wrong: on a NIS system
hostnames are normally not qualified so you cannot obtain the NIS domain
from the host name, and on a non-NIS system the NIS domainname should
remain unset even if the hostname is qualified.

Also, mdadm currently works fine with custom-built kernels having no
initramfs at all. Why break that? It would be much nicer to patch mdadm
to try to read /etc/hostname directly if gethostname() returns an empty
string.

Regarding to the issue Marco raised: in fact it is quite common to
install a machine on an internal network where it gets some random name
from DHCP, and rename it when it is ready to be put at it's intended
location. When you do not have physical access to the final location
then finding out that the machine no longer boots with the new name may
be painful.

Gabor



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Xen support on Squeeze

2010-01-03 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:31:20PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:

 So the change has happened, lthough it took painfully long to get the
 upstream Linux pv_ops framework in shape and all that.. and obviously
 the pv_ops dom0 patches still need to get merged upstream.

That was opposed quite strongly by the kernel folks last time it was
attempted. Were there any fundamental changes in the Xen dom0 patches
since then?

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#535008: configure_networking: support BOOTIF variable set by pxelinux

2009-10-28 Thread Gabor Gombas
Hi,

aolMee too!/aol It'd be really nice to have this integrated.

To add something constructive, mdadm, and lvm2 scripts already use sed
without checking for it or making sure that it is available, so the use
of sed should not be a problem. cryptsetup also uses sed but it at least
forces BUSYBOX=y. IMHO it should be enough to document that BOOT=nfs
requires BUSYBOX=y.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#454718: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686: Does not see the NIC

2009-01-06 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 06:49:05PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:

 Does this error still occur with more recent kernel versions?

I've tried once during the christmas holidays with 2.6.26 and it worked,
so the bug can be closed.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#488273: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: Hangs on a Dell Poweredge 850

2009-01-06 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 02:44:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:

 Does this error still occur with more recent kernel versions?

No idea, all our Dells are now running Mandriva with a 2.6.18-based Xen
kernel, and there is no chance in the near future to try Debian on them
again. I've had other affected machines but they were/are running
vanilla kernels, not Debian provided ones. On these other machines, the
bug has been fixed in 2.6.27 upstream.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input

2008-09-03 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:04:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:

 Although I personally feal the bug is super-duper-hyper-grave, I leave
 the judgement to the linux maintainers.

FYI: I've tried 2.6.27-rc5 and it is up for more than 15 hours now.
That's far more than 2.6.25/26 ever managed on this box (2.6.24 is rock
solid).

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#454718: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686: Does not see the NIC

2007-12-27 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 11:30:32PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:

 please report back if aboves fixes it.

Ok, but it may take 1-2 weeks when I'm next near that machine.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences,
 Laboratory of Parallel and Distributed Systems
 Address   : H-1132 Budapest Victor Hugo u. 18-22. Hungary
 Phone/Fax : +36 1 329-78-64 (secretary)
 W3: http://www.lpds.sztaki.hu
 -



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#454718: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686: Does not see the NIC

2007-12-25 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 11:15:00AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:

 please try newer, unstalbe has 2.6.23-1 that installs just fine in
 testing.

I've tested now 2.6.23-2 and the bug is still present, but only when
powering on the machine. After a reboot (or when booting Windows before
Linux) the network card is visible again.

The reason seems to be the same as before: after power-on, the PCI
bridge at 00:1e.0 is disabled, but after a reboot it gets enabled.

2.6.20 still works fine even right after a power-on.

dmesg of both after a cold start and after reboot are below.

dmesg after cold start:
===

Linux version 2.6.23-1-686 (Debian 2.6.23-2) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 
4.1.3 20071209 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-18)) #1 SMP Fri Dec 21 13:57:07 UTC 
2007
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
 BIOS-e820:  - 0009fc00 (usable)
 BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 000e8000 - 0010 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 0010 - 1ff3 (usable)
 BIOS-e820: 1ff3 - 1ff4 (ACPI data)
 BIOS-e820: 1ff4 - 1fff (ACPI NVS)
 BIOS-e820: 1fff - 2000 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: ffba - 0001 (reserved)
0MB HIGHMEM available.
511MB LOWMEM available.
found SMP MP-table at 000ff780
Entering add_active_range(0, 0, 130864) 0 entries of 256 used
Zone PFN ranges:
  DMA 0 - 4096
  Normal   4096 -   130864
  HighMem130864 -   130864
Movable zone start PFN for each node
early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
0:0 -   130864
On node 0 totalpages: 130864
  DMA zone: 32 pages used for memmap
  DMA zone: 0 pages reserved
  DMA zone: 4064 pages, LIFO batch:0
  Normal zone: 990 pages used for memmap
  Normal zone: 125778 pages, LIFO batch:31
  HighMem zone: 0 pages used for memmap
  Movable zone: 0 pages used for memmap
DMI 2.3 present.
ACPI: RSDP 000F9E70, 0014 (r0 ACPIAM)
ACPI: RSDT 1FF3, 0030 (r1 A M I  OEMRSDT   2000424 MSFT   97)
ACPI: FACP 1FF30200, 0081 (r2 A M I  OEMFACP   2000424 MSFT   97)
ACPI: DSDT 1FF303F0, 3779 (r1  P4PSS P4PSS023   23 INTL  2002026)
ACPI: FACS 1FF4, 0040
ACPI: APIC 1FF30390, 005C (r1 A M I  OEMAPIC   2000424 MSFT   97)
ACPI: OEMB 1FF40040, 003F (r1 A M I  OEMBIOS   2000424 MSFT   97)
ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x808
ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
Processor #0 15:2 APIC version 20
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled)
Processor #1 15:2 APIC version 20
ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0])
IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 32, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
Enabling APIC mode:  Flat.  Using 1 I/O APICs
Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
Allocating PCI resources starting at 3000 (gap: 2000:dfba)
swsusp: Registered nosave memory region: 0009f000 - 000a
swsusp: Registered nosave memory region: 000a - 000e8000
swsusp: Registered nosave memory region: 000e8000 - 0010
Built 1 zonelists in Zone order.  Total pages: 129842
Kernel command line: root=/dev/hda7 ro 
mapped APIC to b000 (fee0)
mapped IOAPIC to a000 (fec0)
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Initializing CPU#0
PID hash table entries: 2048 (order: 11, 8192 bytes)
Detected 2793.185 MHz processor.
Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
console [tty0] enabled
Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Memory: 508652k/523456k available (1721k kernel code, 14244k reserved, 672k 
data, 240k init, 0k highmem)
virtual kernel memory layout:
fixmap  : 0xfff4c000 - 0xf000   ( 716 kB)
pkmap   : 0xff80 - 0xffc0   (4096 kB)
vmalloc : 0xe080 - 0xff7fe000   ( 495 MB)
lowmem  : 0xc000 - 0xdff3   ( 511 MB)
  .init : 0xc035d000 - 0xc0399000   ( 240 kB)
  .data : 0xc02ae7cd - 0xc03568c4   ( 672 kB)
  .text : 0xc010 - 0xc02ae7cd   (1721 kB)
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.
Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 5590.68 BogoMIPS (lpj=11181368)
Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized
SELinux:  Disabled at boot.
Capability LSM initialized
Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
CPU: After generic identify, caps: bfebfbff    4400 
  
CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K
CPU: L2 cache: 512K
CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
CPU: After all inits, caps: bfebfbff   b080 4400 
  
Intel machine check architecture supported.

Bug#454718: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686: Does not see the NIC

2007-12-07 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 11:15:00AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:

 please try newer, unstalbe has 2.6.23-1 that installs just fine in
 testing.

Well, I'm actually using unstable, but linux-image-2.6-686 still pulled
2.6.22. Next time I'll try 2.6.23 but I'll not be near that machine for
approx. 2 weeks.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#454718: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686: Does not see the NIC

2007-12-07 Thread Gabor Gombas
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686
Version: 2.6.22-6
Severity: normal


Hi,

After upgrading to linux-image-2.6.22-3, networking no longer works. In
fact, lspci does no longer show the network card at all.
linux-image-2.6.20-1 (version 2.6.20-3) works fine. dmesg and lspci for
both versions are below; I think the most significant part is this
change in dmesg:

 PCI: Bridge: :00:1e.0
-  IO window: d000-dfff
-  MEM window: fea0-feaf
+  IO window: disabled.
+  MEM window: disabled.
   PREFETCH window: disabled.

The network card (driven by 8139too) is behind that bridge...
The MB is an Asus P4P800S/SE.

Gabor

lspci -vvnn with 2.6.20-3:
==

00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82865G/PE/P DRAM 
Controller/Host-Hub Interface [8086:2570] (rev 02)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device [1043:8110]
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- 
MAbort+ SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0
Region 0: Memory at f800 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M]
Capabilities: [e4] Vendor Specific Information
Capabilities: [a0] AGP version 3.0
Status: RQ=32 Iso- ArqSz=2 Cal=2 SBA+ ITACoh- GART64- HTrans- 
64bit- FW+ AGP3+ Rate=x4,x8
Command: RQ=1 ArqSz=0 Cal=2 SBA+ AGP- GART64- 64bit- FW- 
Rate=none

00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82865G/PE/P PCI to AGP Controller 
[8086:2571] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- 
MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 64
Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=64
Memory behind bridge: fc90-fe9f
Prefetchable memory behind bridge: e7f0-f7ef
Secondary status: 66MHz+ FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort+ SERR- PERR-
BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA- VGA+ MAbort- Reset- FastB2B-

00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB 
UHCI Controller #1 [8086:24d2] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P5P800-MX Mainboard [1043:80a6]
Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 17
Region 4: I/O ports at ef00 [size=32]

00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB 
UHCI Controller #2 [8086:24d4] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P5P800-MX Mainboard [1043:80a6]
Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 18
Region 4: I/O ports at ef20 [size=32]

00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB 
UHCI Controller #3 [8086:24d7] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P5P800-MX Mainboard [1043:80a6]
Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 19
Region 4: I/O ports at ef40 [size=32]

00:1d.3 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB 
UHCI Controller #4 [8086:24de] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P5P800-MX Mainboard [1043:80a6]
Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 17
Region 4: I/O ports at ef80 [size=32]

00:1d.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 
EHCI Controller [8086:24dd] (rev 02) (prog-if 20 [EHCI])
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P5P800-MX Mainboard [1043:80a6]
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin D routed to IRQ 20
Region 0: Memory at febffc00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K]
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=375mA 
PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-

Bug#425050: initramfs-tools: Ask if we should update all initramfses

2007-05-19 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:26:25PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:

 Come on. `useless debconf proliferation'? The question has medium
 priority. I can also make it an configration option somewhere and use
 that, but it was just a convenient why to get info from a user.

I'd also say a debconf question is overkill. People who understand what
the option means can edit a config file by hand.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: sysctl syscall removed in 2.6.18+ kernels

2006-08-16 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 06:11:18PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

 It already started to annoy some people having their log filled with
 such messages.

IMHO if the message is not rate-limited you should bug the kernel
developers (preferably upstream on linux-kernel). Printing the message
1-2 times per boot is OK but after that it is meaningless.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: bits from the release team

2006-01-04 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:23:31AM -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) 
wrote:

   Perhaps the idea of maintain a kernel with other distros is not bad,
 if Ubuntu shows up as a candidate, I would like to add Progeny, Linspire,
 Xandros, DCC Alliance Fan Club and also other Debian Derivatives. I really
 don't know if it is possible to mix RH, Debian, SuSE, Slackware and
 other distros to maintain the same kernel, but certainly should be possible
 to get all Debian (and Debian based/derivative) playing together. :-)

Different distros have different target audiences so this may not be
easy. Often fixing a driver bug for one class of users breaks it for an
other class of users so it is quite possible that different distros want
different bugs to be fixed/left alone.

Also, other distros (e.g. RedHat) already found out the hard way that
diverging too much from upstream costs a lot. So unless you find someone
to pay the maintainers of such a forked kernel, it will not work out in
the long term.

   If you give it a quick look (and a quick try), we will have more
 users testing the same kernel, which means more feedback, we will have
 more developers working to get it stable and working to get it secure.
 Probably even upstream get benefits from this model and sounds like a very
 good way to work together, even to try to integrate outside patches and
 backporting things. =)

Dave Jones (Fedora) and Greg KH (Gentoo) already posted a much better idea
on l-k: make packages from daily -git snapshots available for distro
testers, so bugs like the past udev breakages are found _before_ the
next official kernel version is released.

Packaging at least -rc kernels for unstable might be a good idea for
Debian too. That would provide more testing coverage for -rc releases,
and this is what upstream needs the most.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: bits from the release team

2006-01-04 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:26:51PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:

 the -rc kernels are build in experimental, staging area for unstable
 and without any potential d-i breakage.

Ah, nice, I did not notice it. Perhaps it should get some more publicity
to attract more testers :-)

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: bits from the release team

2006-01-03 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:10:49AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:

 But yes, udev is the problematic case, altough i run 2.6.14 with sarge udev
 and it works.

AFAIK it should work with the default ruleset. It breaks only with
certain custom rules due to a bug in the libsysfs version used by udev.

So, if you did not create any udev rules yourself you should be fine.
With old udev and new kernel my rules that map my USB disks to persistent
names under /dev were definitely broken.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]