Bug#391626: Please include mol into linux-modules-extra before etch
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: unionfs is currently deactivated in SVN. should not be deactivated; unionfs does work since 1.4-2 and waldi is informed that he has do adapt from [...]/linux-2.6 to [...]/build. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391626: Please include mol into linux-modules-extra before etch
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:10:37AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:48:21AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:20:52AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > > > tags 391626 +patch > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > As the mol maintainer I would really appreciate it if you could include > > > > my patch before the etch release. The patch is already in the bug log > > > > since about a month. > > > > AFAICS a new upload of linux-modules-extra is needed anyway for > > > > linux-image-2.6.18-2-*. > > > > > > > > Please contact me if you need additional information or assistance. If > > > > you are busy with other things I can also prepare an NMU. > > > > > > Installing linux-support-2.6.18-2 and building the debian/control with it > > > fails with : > > > > Ok, i applied it with the gencontrol.py patch excluded and without mol in > > the > > main defines. > > > > Gaudenz/Bastian, can you look over the gencontrol.py failure and fix the > > patch ? > > It seems that Bastian already applied the patch in SVN. The current SVN > builds without problems for me (and the resulting mol modules work). > > As there needs to be another upload for 2.6.18-2 anyway I hope that the > mol modules will be included. There will be an upload for -3, and mol should be included then. > > But my test build failed in unionfs due to sioq.h missing, so there will be > > need of some work for 2.6.18-2 anyway. > > unionfs is currently deactivated in SVN. Indeed. We solved this quickly after i wrote that mail. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391626: Please include mol into linux-modules-extra before etch
Hi On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:48:21AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:20:52AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > > tags 391626 +patch > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > As the mol maintainer I would really appreciate it if you could include > > > my patch before the etch release. The patch is already in the bug log > > > since about a month. > > > AFAICS a new upload of linux-modules-extra is needed anyway for > > > linux-image-2.6.18-2-*. > > > > > > Please contact me if you need additional information or assistance. If > > > you are busy with other things I can also prepare an NMU. > > > > Installing linux-support-2.6.18-2 and building the debian/control with it > > fails with : > > Ok, i applied it with the gencontrol.py patch excluded and without mol in the > main defines. > > Gaudenz/Bastian, can you look over the gencontrol.py failure and fix the > patch ? It seems that Bastian already applied the patch in SVN. The current SVN builds without problems for me (and the resulting mol modules work). As there needs to be another upload for 2.6.18-2 anyway I hope that the mol modules will be included. > > But my test build failed in unionfs due to sioq.h missing, so there will be > need of some work for 2.6.18-2 anyway. unionfs is currently deactivated in SVN. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391626: Please include mol into linux-modules-extra before etch
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:20:52AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > tags 391626 +patch > > > > Hi > > > > As the mol maintainer I would really appreciate it if you could include > > my patch before the etch release. The patch is already in the bug log > > since about a month. > > AFAICS a new upload of linux-modules-extra is needed anyway for > > linux-image-2.6.18-2-*. > > > > Please contact me if you need additional information or assistance. If > > you are busy with other things I can also prepare an NMU. > > Installing linux-support-2.6.18-2 and building the debian/control with it > fails with : Ok, i applied it with the gencontrol.py patch excluded and without mol in the main defines. Gaudenz/Bastian, can you look over the gencontrol.py failure and fix the patch ? But my test build failed in unionfs due to sioq.h missing, so there will be need of some work for 2.6.18-2 anyway. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391626: Please include mol into linux-modules-extra before etch
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> tags 391626 +patch
>
> Hi
>
> As the mol maintainer I would really appreciate it if you could include
> my patch before the etch release. The patch is already in the bug log
> since about a month.
> AFAICS a new upload of linux-modules-extra is needed anyway for
> linux-image-2.6.18-2-*.
>
> Please contact me if you need additional information or assistance. If
> you are busy with other things I can also prepare an NMU.
Installing linux-support-2.6.18-2 and building the debian/control with it
fails with :
$ debian/rules debian/control
if [ -f debian/control ] && [ -f debian/control.md5sum ] && [ -f
debian/rules.gen ]; then \
if md5sum debian/changelog debian/templates/control.modules.in
debian/templates/control.source.in | diff - debian/control.md5sum > /dev/null;
then true; else \
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules debian/control-real; \
fi \
else \
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules debian/control-real; \
fi
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/sven/debian/kernel/trunk/build/linux-modules-extra-2.6'
debian/bin/gencontrol.py /usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-2/modules/..
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "debian/bin/gencontrol.py", line 157, in ?
gencontrol(sys.argv[1] + "/arch")()
File
"/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-2/lib/python/debian_linux/gencontrol.py", line
36, in __call__
self.do_main(packages, makefile)
File
"/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-2/lib/python/debian_linux/gencontrol.py", line
59, in do_main
self.do_arch(packages, makefile, arch, vars.copy(), makeflags.copy(),
extra)
File
"/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-2/lib/python/debian_linux/gencontrol.py", line
120, in do_arch
self.do_arch_recurse(packages, makefile, arch, vars, makeflags, extra)
File
"/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-2/lib/python/debian_linux/gencontrol.py", line
136, in do_arch_recurse
self.do_subarch(packages, makefile, arch, subarch, vars.copy(),
makeflags.copy(), extra)
File
"/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-2/lib/python/debian_linux/gencontrol.py", line
149, in do_subarch
self.do_subarch_recurse(packages, makefile, arch, subarch, vars,
makeflags, extra)
File
"/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-2/lib/python/debian_linux/gencontrol.py", line
165, in do_subarch_recurse
self.do_flavour(packages, makefile, arch, subarch, flavour, vars.copy(),
makeflags.copy(), extra)
File "debian/bin/gencontrol.py", line 46, in do_flavour
self.do_module(module, packages, makefile, arch, subarch, flavour,
vars.copy(), makeflags.copy(), extra)
File "debian/bin/gencontrol.py", line 53, in do_module
config_entry = self.config['base', module]
File "/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-2/lib/python/debian_linux/config.py",
line 37, in __getitem__
return self.get(key)
File "/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-2/lib/python/debian_linux/config.py",
line 52, in get
raise KeyError, key
KeyError: ('base', 'mol')
make[1]: *** [debian/control-real] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/sven/debian/kernel/trunk/build/linux-modules-extra-2.6'
make: *** [debian/control] Error 2
Bastian, this is your call.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391626: something broken in the debian/control generation concept ? (Was: Bug#391626: Please include mol into linux-modules-extra before etch)
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > tags 391626 +patch > > Hi > > As the mol maintainer I would really appreciate it if you could include > my patch before the etch release. The patch is already in the bug log > since about a month. > AFAICS a new upload of linux-modules-extra is needed anyway for > linux-image-2.6.18-2-*. > > Please contact me if you need additional information or assistance. If > you are busy with other things I can also prepare an NMU. I did give it a try, but i faced : $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc dpkg-buildpackage: source package is linux-modules-extra-2.6 dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 2.6.18-2 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture powerpc dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 2.6.18-2 dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: cannot read control file debian/control: No such file or directory dpkg-buildpackage: Build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied; aborting. dpkg-buildpackage: (Use -d flag to override.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/kernel/trunk/build/linux-modules-extra-2.6$ debian/rules debian/control debian/rules:5: /usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-1/modules/rules.include: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.18-1/modules/rules.include'. Stop. Which seems to indicate that there is something broken in the linux-modules-extra-2.6 concept, since you need to have the dependencies satisfied (i suppose) when building the debian/control, while at the same time you cannot run dpkg-buildpackage to get the missing dependencies without the debian/control file. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391626: Please include mol into linux-modules-extra before etch
tags 391626 +patch Hi As the mol maintainer I would really appreciate it if you could include my patch before the etch release. The patch is already in the bug log since about a month. AFAICS a new upload of linux-modules-extra is needed anyway for linux-image-2.6.18-2-*. Please contact me if you need additional information or assistance. If you are busy with other things I can also prepare an NMU. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ pgptUBnNw2CZP.pgp Description: PGP signature
