Re: Legal question about a model
On 2004-01-13 20:36:09 + Roland Marcus Rutschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The software is totally under GPL but ships with a graphical head-model that is confined to the use with tempo itself. (And this model is needed) Is there any other possibility than bringing it into non-free? Convince them to place the model under a GPL-compatible free software licence.
Re: Re: Legal question about a model
Hi, The software is totally under GPL but ships with a graphical head-model that is confined to the use with tempo itself. (And this model is needed) Is there any other possibility than bringing it into non-free? Convince them to place the model under a GPL-compatible free software licence. That's not so easy. The author (or better his university) has licensed this model for the purpose of this program. So I'd had to either convince the company it was licensed from (which wants to make money with such models) or the university to pay more so this model can than be included in debian which I think is not very realistic. I take the answer than as a complete No. Regards, Roland -- Roland Marcus Rutschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg-key: http://neuro.psychologie.uni-oldenburg.de/~rutschmann/ich/ pgpN3ZbgoENnr.pgp Description: signature
Re: Legal question about a model
On Jan 13, 2004, at 15:36, Roland Marcus Rutschmann wrote: Unfortunatly there is a DFSG problem: The software is totally under GPL but ships with a graphical head-model that is confined to the use with tempo itself. (And this model is needed) Is there any other possibility than bringing it into non-free? You could separate the model out, put that in non-free, and put the GPL part in contrib. Hope that some day a free model comes along.
