Request for sponsor: timer-q1 and socket-poll1

2001-02-10 Thread James Antill


 I'm in n the NM queue, and would like someone to sponsor my packages
"timer-q1", "timer-q1--dev", "socket-poll1" and "socket-poll1-dev".
 Adding...

deb-src ftp://ftp.and.org/debian/james_debs/ ./

...to your sources.list will get the source.

-- 
# James Antill -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:0:
* ^From: .*james@and\.org
/dev/null


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: help in interpreting the packaging manual

2001-02-10 Thread Joey Hess

Domenico Andreoli wrote:
 now reading the packaging manual i found this writing:
 
 "A Conflicts entry should almost never have an `earlier than' version
  clause. This would prevent dpkg from upgrading or installing the package
  which declared such a conflict until the upgrade or removal of the
  conflicted-with package had been completed. This aspect of installation
  ordering is not handled by dselect, so that the use Conflicts in this
  way is likely to cause problems for `bulk run' upgrades and
  installations."
 
 now i'm not really undestanding the point, is it telling me i'm going
 to have problems during upgrade? what does it mean "bulk run"?

A bulk run is something like dpkg --BORGiE. We use to use such command
lines for upgrades in the days before apt, when the above was written.

-- 
see shy jo


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: help in interpreting the packaging manual

2001-02-10 Thread Ingo Saitz

On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:40:36PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
 now reading the packaging manual i found this writing:
 
 "A Conflicts entry should almost never have an `earlier than' version
  clause. This would prevent dpkg from upgrading or installing the package
  which declared such a conflict until the upgrade or removal of the
  conflicted-with package had been completed. This aspect of installation
  ordering is not handled by dselect, so that the use Conflicts in this
  way is likely to cause problems for `bulk run' upgrades and
  installations."

I think this is for the old dselect methods which simply put all
*.deb files in one (or more) subdirs and called "dpkg -GROBiE .".
When using apt as dselect method as current installations already
default to, apt does the neccessary reordering.

 now i'm not really undestanding the point, is it telling me i'm going
 to have problems during upgrade? what does it mean "bulk run"?

It seems to me that this paragraph of the policy might be
obsoleted by now?

Ingo
-- 
16  Hard coded constant for amount of room allowed for
cache align and faster forwarding (tunable)

-- seen in /usr/src/linux-2.2.14/net/TUNABLE


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




rp-pppoe already in Debian!

2001-02-10 Thread Joerg Friedrich

Hi Justin!

I've just seen your ITP of rp-pppoe.
This is already in Debian. the package is called pppoe and
packaged by Christian Hudon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

But Christian seems to be MIA. I recently tried to contact him
but he never answered. I asked him to update to newest upstream.

I intended to apply as Debian-Developer and overtake (rp-)pppoe.
I'm still willing to do just to keep this package up to date. But 
if you want to maintain it I do not need to. I packaged latest rp-pppoe
(V2.8 released 2001-02-05) which closes all open bugs except one. 
You can take a look at 
http://iris.rz.uni-konstanz.de/~jfried/roe and use it if you like to.

Please tell me if you're still interested in packaging rp-pppoe.
If you do not answer within one week (until Sun 2001-02-17) I will apply 
as Debian-Developer and overtake rp-pppoe.


-- 
Heute ist nicht alle Tage, ich komm' wieder, keine Frage!!!

   Joerg


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




New package [apt-sources]. Need assistance.

2001-02-10 Thread Danny Rodriguez

Dear Debian People,


I have written a new package called apt-sources. Essentially, the purpose
of this package is to generate a sources.list (/etc/apt) using the closest
servers to the host it is being run on. It can either use a list of servers
in a file (in URL format, ie. ftp:// or http://), or it will query
debian.org and download an updated mirrors file, parse the HTML out and use
that. The scoring program it uses is Netselect, however it is not a
dependency. I have embedded the Netselect source code in the program, seeing
as how I am only using it utilizing certain options, it seemed optimal that
I would incorperate the source code and take out any extra code that may be
slowing the program down.

Future modifications will possibly be adding in BING support to test
bandwidth, but as I am not totally fluent with the Netselect source code
yet, it may take a little while to incorperate as well.

I have never developed a package for Debian before, or Linux for that
matter. I am, however, a very experienced programmer in Windows and DOS, so
please don't consider me a rookie as far as that is concerned. :)

I have looked up the requirements for becoming a Debian developer, and it
seems very long and complicated. I know I require to get my GPG key signed,
and have no idea who to get to sign it. I think I need a sponser, and also
have no idea who to get for it. The author of APT seemed uninterested in
this package, as did the author of Netselect, however most people that I
explain the usage of the package too are right on.

If you'd like the package source-code and feel like helping a newbie Debian
developer out, please contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED], I keep this
e-mail strictly for mailing list e-mails, as it can get quite busy
sometimes. The package is distributed under the BSD license.

Thank you for reading this huge e-mail, I hope to get some support soon.



   
 - Danny Rodriguez


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Request for sponsor: timer-q1 and socket-poll1

2001-02-10 Thread James Antill

 I'm in n the NM queue, and would like someone to sponsor my packages
timer-q1, timer-q1--dev, socket-poll1 and socket-poll1-dev.
 Adding...

deb-src ftp://ftp.and.org/debian/james_debs/ ./

...to your sources.list will get the source.

-- 
# James Antill -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:0:
* ^From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/dev/null



Re: help in interpreting the packaging manual

2001-02-10 Thread Joey Hess
Domenico Andreoli wrote:
 now reading the packaging manual i found this writing:
 
 A Conflicts entry should almost never have an `earlier than' version
  clause. This would prevent dpkg from upgrading or installing the package
  which declared such a conflict until the upgrade or removal of the
  conflicted-with package had been completed. This aspect of installation
  ordering is not handled by dselect, so that the use Conflicts in this
  way is likely to cause problems for `bulk run' upgrades and
  installations.
 
 now i'm not really undestanding the point, is it telling me i'm going
 to have problems during upgrade? what does it mean bulk run?

A bulk run is something like dpkg --BORGiE. We use to use such command
lines for upgrades in the days before apt, when the above was written.

-- 
see shy jo



Re: help in interpreting the packaging manual

2001-02-10 Thread Ingo Saitz
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:40:36PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
 now reading the packaging manual i found this writing:
 
 A Conflicts entry should almost never have an `earlier than' version
  clause. This would prevent dpkg from upgrading or installing the package
  which declared such a conflict until the upgrade or removal of the
  conflicted-with package had been completed. This aspect of installation
  ordering is not handled by dselect, so that the use Conflicts in this
  way is likely to cause problems for `bulk run' upgrades and
  installations.

I think this is for the old dselect methods which simply put all
*.deb files in one (or more) subdirs and called dpkg -GROBiE ..
When using apt as dselect method as current installations already
default to, apt does the neccessary reordering.

 now i'm not really undestanding the point, is it telling me i'm going
 to have problems during upgrade? what does it mean bulk run?

It seems to me that this paragraph of the policy might be
obsoleted by now?

Ingo
-- 
16  Hard coded constant for amount of room allowed for
cache align and faster forwarding (tunable)

-- seen in /usr/src/linux-2.2.14/net/TUNABLE



rp-pppoe already in Debian!

2001-02-10 Thread Joerg Friedrich
Hi Justin!

I've just seen your ITP of rp-pppoe.
This is already in Debian. the package is called pppoe and
packaged by Christian Hudon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

But Christian seems to be MIA. I recently tried to contact him
but he never answered. I asked him to update to newest upstream.

I intended to apply as Debian-Developer and overtake (rp-)pppoe.
I'm still willing to do just to keep this package up to date. But 
if you want to maintain it I do not need to. I packaged latest rp-pppoe
(V2.8 released 2001-02-05) which closes all open bugs except one. 
You can take a look at 
http://iris.rz.uni-konstanz.de/~jfried/rp­pppoe and use it if you like to.

Please tell me if you're still interested in packaging rp-pppoe.
If you do not answer within one week (until Sun 2001-02-17) I will apply 
as Debian-Developer and overtake rp-pppoe.


-- 
Heute ist nicht alle Tage, ich komm' wieder, keine Frage!!!

   Joerg



Re: rp-pppoe already in Debian!

2001-02-10 Thread Joerg Friedrich
Joerg Friedrich schrieb am Samstag, 10. Februar 2001 um 18:14:44 +0100:
 You can take a look at 
 http://iris.rz.uni-konstanz.de/~jfried/rp­pppoe and use it if you like to.
oops, i forgot to ask if some mentor can look at it and give some hints
whats done wrong or not compatible with the policy. 


-- 
Heute ist nicht alle Tage, ich komm' wieder, keine Frage!!!

   Joerg



New package [apt-sources]. Need assistance.

2001-02-10 Thread Danny Rodriguez
Dear Debian People,


I have written a new package called apt-sources. Essentially, the 
purpose
of this package is to generate a sources.list (/etc/apt) using the closest
servers to the host it is being run on. It can either use a list of servers
in a file (in URL format, ie. ftp:// or http://), or it will query
debian.org and download an updated mirrors file, parse the HTML out and use
that. The scoring program it uses is Netselect, however it is not a
dependency. I have embedded the Netselect source code in the program, seeing
as how I am only using it utilizing certain options, it seemed optimal that
I would incorperate the source code and take out any extra code that may be
slowing the program down.

Future modifications will possibly be adding in BING support to test
bandwidth, but as I am not totally fluent with the Netselect source code
yet, it may take a little while to incorperate as well.

I have never developed a package for Debian before, or Linux for that
matter. I am, however, a very experienced programmer in Windows and DOS, so
please don't consider me a rookie as far as that is concerned. :)

I have looked up the requirements for becoming a Debian developer, and 
it
seems very long and complicated. I know I require to get my GPG key signed,
and have no idea who to get to sign it. I think I need a sponser, and also
have no idea who to get for it. The author of APT seemed uninterested in
this package, as did the author of Netselect, however most people that I
explain the usage of the package too are right on.

If you'd like the package source-code and feel like helping a newbie 
Debian
developer out, please contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED], I keep this
e-mail strictly for mailing list e-mails, as it can get quite busy
sometimes. The package is distributed under the BSD license.

Thank you for reading this huge e-mail, I hope to get some support soon.




- Danny Rodriguez