Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator
Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 22:27:29 (+0200 CEST), Emilien Klein a écrit : > Paul Gevers, Julien Valroff, [...] > Can you please check my updated package [1]? Thanks! I'll have a look during the week-end. Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ ~ : :' : Debian Developer & Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110415041033.gc7...@kirya.net
Re: RFS: alure (updated package)
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: > Paul Wise suggested it, referencing the Debian Library Packaging guide. He > also said it's no problem because no program in Debian is using alure yet. I thought I said that libpkg-guide was wrong about library dev package names. My comment about nothing using it was unrelated to that though. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktim_bktbm+hvxeeatu7x3bonp9-...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: sonic
Hello, Bill Cox, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 15:52:55 -0400, a écrit : > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sonic". Err, didn't you see my comments on your package back in january? Here they are again: > - I'm afraid the samples/ directory should be dropped from the .orig > tarball: as I understand it, they were produced at least by some > proprietary synthesizers (eloquence and voxin), so their distribution > is probably unsure. Since you do not install them in the .deb > packages, it's probably better to not even ship them in .orig.tar and > see ftpmaster frown their eyes on them. > - The same question may hold on doc/*.flac: how were they produced? > - Why do you build with -pthread? > - Please drop the empty line at the end of debian/libsonic0.symbols, > dh_makeshlibs warns out. > - The resulting binary gets called libsonic.so.0.1.10, shouldn't that be > 0.1.13? > - You could perhaps ship main.c in libsonic-dev in > /usr/share/doc/libsonic-dev, for documentation purpose. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110414220208.gr7...@const.famille.thibault.fr
Re: RFS: alure (updated package)
Am 14.04.2011 22:14, schrieb Andres Mejia: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: Am 13.04.2011 00:23, schrieb Andres Mejia: Yes, same terms as upstream source. Ok, done. Ok. Took a quick look at changes to the packaging. Why did you rename the development package? Did you intend to maintain more than one version of alure? Paul Wise suggested it, referencing the Debian Library Packaging guide. He also said it's no problem because no program in Debian is using alure yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da76740.2070...@physik.uni-hamburg.de
Re: Hello
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:19:37 +0300, Kyriakos wrote: > I have available time and because I love using debian I would like to > contribute in the packaging so updates can come quicker. Is there a mentor > that can mentor me? I use debian sid with kde but sometimes I use e17 and > gnome too Thanks for your offer to help. A good way to start with packaging is to join an existing team; http://wiki.debian.org/Teams has a nice overview, maybe you find an area of interest there. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `-BOFH excuse #444: overflow error in /dev/null signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-04-14 22:27, Emilien Klein wrote: > [...] > > Also, I have installed Squeeze in a VM. Since running the packaging in > Debian directly, Lintian is not complaining anymore about using a too > recent Standards-Version. With that, all 3 of Julien's initials > comments [0] have now been addressed, and the package is now looking > good! > Just so you know, Lintian should complain about your Standards-Version these days. None of the released versions of Lintian currently in Debian (2.5.0~rc2 or older) knows of the newest Standards-Version 3.9.2. It is scheduled for the next upload of Lintian, but until then you should see a newer-standards-version. > Can you please check my updated package [1]? Thanks! > > Cheers! > +Emilien > > [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/03/msg00384.html > [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nautilus-image-manipulator/ > > ~Niels -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNp2OQAAoJEAVLu599gGRCWjwP/3JnJSKmNRDOtQ+zaMzgZrvK GlnO0uEMxnpDPBrtx8MvoJ3mTceqcwxQSrC4v+6B87iaCGpLGixvP85FHfDQAlnX NHOA0nAaPu2pUlmiQqOLkxa0W1CImepx3aG6eCFK7GvO71yKjcmv33lBLCXp0lFA b0xi28nB+vY5fcETJICAebSVw3rtbhQOb1kFYiMA2A8AsLfu4YB30LZBCiNaO/Vi qrI6tzqDXYbEQ+YhDbONGUSpXlw5weJ1kTs9ahErBIB4r5zPlOJF/Z3fWaxFdTSk x8HiLL3Unl4AEqMx0iz/f3SmDGdS3jUgtiN0eDZ48UyPU/G8QMTttFL2+CvKQVPw MiJ899v4+FuC8lPzL0nc5/U9ozWSuMXEwwWqBkYULcHfZ5DnpyTaQ7GWo4ul8JJm 7/B5Odm/QdcNSJrcrXcW9Dn6Gr0+GhZFFuU+UZP0X9w3wCyhtSbzA3i8phy3r58P lN8prL+O5oietGT0Y3AcmPAug28/wNpuzvHSTGqGx+ZgVDJMa0Vp5+KbcjASxt+I UjHjbC27LiNbh+OSUBQB2wC5njGZq39InQCAlynO2CQuk6pOZN68/zBh/Zev6c44 qRwF/vnbacWETM5ZlJYku4i4YH7zqwRKYARJC423OIk1VQrGsbWzviSHQwTmDx/r 2XzkSWwbJ5h5VFOxacRh =EdFX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da76391.6020...@thykier.net
Re: RFS: piwik
Hello, I'm back to work on the package just today due to other activity in Debian (and not). Next days I will try to find a solution for the problem that you have reported. In the meantime, as temporary solution, would be fine if it remained in non-free section. What do you think? We may also then file a bug to request to move the package on main. Mine is not an imposition is just because I'd like to share with people more experienced than me any choice. I've also opened an collab-maint project on alioth [1] so maybe someone helps me play with swf and mtask. Finally there is a little problem with d/watch because the upstream released 'latest.zip' without any minor/major number related to the version but for this thing I can find a fast solution. Cheers, Fabrizio. [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/piwik.git;a=summary Il giorno lun, 07/03/2011 alle 10.17 +0100, Julien Viard de Galbert ha scritto: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 05:00:47PM +0100, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: > > Il giorno sab, 05/03/2011 alle 23.56 +0100, Christoph Egger ha scritto: > [...] > > > > > > There are some compiled files like > > > libs/open-flash-chart/open-flash-chart.swf that come without source and > > > are not build from source during package build. Please fix that (or put > > > the package on non-free) > > > > > > > Hi Christoph, > > > > I think the easy way is to move the package to non-free section. > > Not sure about the package name: it should be piwik-nonfree? > > (something like flashplugin-nonfree or others) > > I've update the package on mentors. > > Thank you for your revision. > > > > Regards > > Fabrizio. > > > > Hello, > > There are three flash files in piwik, two of them have source code, the > third one might not be that important... > However you might need tools outside debian to build them... > - plugins/UserCountryMap/PiwikMap.swf >This one is part of piwik code see [1], >it seams to be build using flashdevlop [2]. > - libs/open-flash-chart/open-flash-chart.swf >This one claim on its website that it is open source [3] ! >There is actually a copy in piwik repos [4] (could be nice to see if >they changed anything, as open-flash-chart could be a separate >package) seams to also build with flashdevlop. > - ./libs/swfobject/expressInstall.swf >That seams to come from Adobe... but it only seams to be a >placeholder when user don't have the proper flash version to ask him >to download flash... So it could probably be removed... > > 1: http://dev.piwik.org/trac/browser/worldmap/trunk/mapRenderer > 2: http://www.flashdevelop.org/wikidocs/index.php?title=Main_Page > 3: http://teethgrinder.co.uk/open-flash-chart/index.php > 4: http://dev.piwik.org/trac/browser/open-flash-chart/trunk > > I remember some discussion about building flash on debian, when the bugs > to remove the compiled .swf for squeeze (maybe [5]...). From that > discussion I guess 'mtask' [6] could be one tool you need... > > 5: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/08/msg00082.html > 6: http://packages.debian.org/mtasc > > So to conclude, that's certainly not the _easy_ way, but it could be the > best way ;) > > Looking forward to see piwik in debian. > > Hope this helps, > > Best Regards, > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator
Paul Gevers, Julien Valroff, I've created the package both with debuild and pdebuild. The latter made me realize I needed more build dependencies (pkg-config, python-nautilus) that where used by the `python setup.py install` command. The package was building OK, but since those packages where not available at install time, the setup script was not creating the Nautilus extension... Regarding the automatic patches created, i was able to trace its creation: `python setup.py install` automatically rebuilds the i18n files. In doing so, it updates the .pot translation template IN the source files. This is OK the first time you create the package, no patch is added to the debian package. However, if you create the package a second time, since the .pot file has been modified with respect to the source tarball, the builder tools will create a patch, thinking that the change was made on purpose/manually. In order to address this, I added a command to override_dh_clean that extracts the .pot file from the .orig.tar.gz tarball and replaces the eventually modified .pot file in the source directory. That way, when cleaning the build environment, the .pot file is the same as what was shipped in the source tarball. Also, I have installed Squeeze in a VM. Since running the packaging in Debian directly, Lintian is not complaining anymore about using a too recent Standards-Version. With that, all 3 of Julien's initials comments [0] have now been addressed, and the package is now looking good! Can you please check my updated package [1]? Thanks! Cheers! +Emilien [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/03/msg00384.html [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nautilus-image-manipulator/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktimwtfvxmrtbczt9iih_pqkvokh...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: alure (updated package)
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: > Am 13.04.2011 00:23, schrieb Andres Mejia: >> >> Yes, same terms as upstream source. >> > Ok, done. Ok. Took a quick look at changes to the packaging. Why did you rename the development package? Did you intend to maintain more than one version of alure? > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-games-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da53587.2090...@gmx.de > > -- Regards, Andres Mejia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktinzy8zhsdfcrg4zdphlojz-bbp...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Hello
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Kyriakos wrote: > I have available time and because I love using debian I would like to > contribute in the packaging so updates can come quicker. Is there a mentor > that can mentor me? I use debian sid with kde but sometimes I use e17 and > gnome too I would start with FAQ: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq and browsing archives of this list, you should find posts with similar question: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/10/msg00272.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/07/msg00285.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/11/msg00375.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/08/msg00437.html I think that you should decide which package/packages you're interested in helping packaging and move from there. Best of luck! Tomek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=8un8Js=v8lz1tc5dp9vh5gy6...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: sonic
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sonic". * Package name: sonic Version : 0.1.14-1 Upstream Author : Bill Cox (me) * URL : http://dev.vinux-project.org/sonic/ * License : LGPL v2.1 Section : sound It builds these binary packages: libsonic-dev - Header file for linking to libsonic libsonic0 - Simple library to speed up or slow down speech sonic - Simple utility to speed up or slow down speech The package appears to be lintian clean. My motivation for maintaining this package is: Better sound quality for speeding up speech, vs other packages available in Debian, especially for over 2X speedup, and in all cases relative to WSOLA base algorithms. Sonic is already the best library used in Android for playing audio books at high speed (Astro Player, Osplay, others soon), and is also used in several TTS engines. My goal in creating sonic and licensing it LGPL is to enable all tech gadgets to speak clearly at high speed. This is especially important for people with vision impairments. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sonic - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sonic/sonic_0.1.14-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Bill Cox -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktikycdxot7qrj864wn8oww1levw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: bournal
torsdag den 14 april 2011 klockan 21:14 skrev Jeffrey Ratcliffe detta: > On 14 April 2011 14:27, Mats Erik Andersson > wrote: > > URL : http://becauserinter.net/bournal/ > > This should be http://becauseinter.net/bournal/ My sincere thanks for reporting this observation. The packaging is correct, but I had to send a note to the original ITP thread for correction, since the RFS was based on the ITP text. Thanks again, Mats Erik Andersson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110414194851.ga25...@mea.homelinux.org
Re: RFS: bournal
On 14 April 2011 14:27, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > URL : http://becauserinter.net/bournal/ This should be http://becauseinter.net/bournal/ Regards Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTinfwQU1STTtG-3_Hk0=jkzsow9...@mail.gmail.com
On repackaging source, caused by GFDL-1.3.
Dear all masters of the trade, I am in a position with "gnurush" that the upstream author has not responded within a reasonable time as to what his future intentions are regarding texinfo source, which mandates front-cover and back-cover to be included. Therefore I will proceed to repackage the upstream source, in order that I may finally resolve an RFP, for which my packaging was already rejected by the FTP Master. On fair grounds, I must add. Removing the texinfo source from the source archive will be standard enough, as will the tweaking of the build system probably be. However, my intention is to isolate the rebellic Texinfo part into a separate package "gnurush-doc", that would have to go into "non-free". Already from the beginning did I compose manual pages for the offered binaries, so this separation will not violate any policy on that account. Keeping the full upstream source in order to build a fairly minute documentation package seems rather waistful. Is there some alternate common practice available? That would suggest a small tailored repackaging in order to target this "gnurush-doc", only containing the Texinfo document and the supplementary files for Debian? Best regards, Mats Erik Andersson, DM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110414165609.ga23...@mea.homelinux.org
RFS: myspell-el-gr (updated upstream)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-1 of my package "myspell-el-gr". It builds these binary packages: myspell-el-gr - Greek (el_GR) dictionary for myspell The package appears to be lintian clean and can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/myspell-el-gr - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/myspell-el-gr/myspell-el-gr_0.8-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. PS: Please CC me in your replies, since I am not subscribed int he list Kind regards Nick Andrik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAk2nApEACgkQrdZ2oYS0I7Lr6wCeOaeak0PodSK/gyVcrLHyC/vC /XYAmO49So2OouxnCLmxr0PDYrDXiB4= =QPHe -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da70291.1080...@gmail.com
RFS: bournal
Dear mentors, it is my hope to find a sponsor for the package "bournal": Package name : bournal Version : 1.5-1 Upstream authors : Prof. Fapsanders URL : http://becauserinter.net/bournal/ License : GPL-3+ Section : misc It builds a single binary package: bournal- encrypting journal or diary for the console The package appears to be lintian clean, which is not so hard for a Bash script, with some added menu and desktop overlay. The upload would fix the single ITP bug: 622297 The software has already existed for a handful years, but it is only now when the encryption method has moved to GnuPG, that it is trustworthy enough to be officially maintained. Personally I appreciate the ability to keep a local journal, which I know is stored encrypted at all times, and which is useable in a console, where I do most of my work. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bournal - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bournal/bournal_1.5-1.dsc Best regards, Mats Erik Andersson, DM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110414122754.ga22...@mea.homelinux.org
Re: RFC/RFS: hg-fast-export
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:29:35PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > Well, there is https://github.com/offbytwo/git-hg , it is a 120-lines > > shell script which uses (bundled) hg-fast-export and seems to create a hg > > repo at .git/hgcheckout, but I didn't try it. > I've tried git-hg from https://github.com/barak/git-hg and filed an ITP > for it. > It can be used as git-hg clone http://hgrepo/ hgrepo and then git-hg > fetch, but it apparently doesn't offer anything to people who clone the > resulting git repo and want to update it from the upstream hg. git-hg and hg-fast-export are in NEW (by git-hg author, bap@). -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
