Bug#663885: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#663885: RFS: googlefontdirectory-tools/20120309.1-1

2012-03-16 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Martin Erik Werner (martinerikwer...@gmail.com):

 Please upgrade to lintian 1.5.6, see my initial post for more info ;)


Ahh, oops, overread that..:-)

(well, my build chroot is supposed to be updated every day but the
local mirror I use has indeed trouble nowadays : it not longer fitsin
my server's disk space and I'm probably a bit outdated in these build
chroots)




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#664181: RFS: trustmanager/3.0.5-1 [ITP]

2012-03-16 Thread Dennis van Dok
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package trustmanager

 * Package name: trustmanager
   Version : 3.0.5-1
   Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
 * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
 * License : [fill in]
   Section : java

  It builds those binary packages:

libtrustmanager-java - Java TrustManager interface with grid features
 libtrustmanager-java-doc - Java TrustManager interface with grid features

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/trustmanager


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/trustmanager/trustmanager_3.0.5-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release. (Closes: #656389)

  Regards,
   Dennis van Dok



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120316085620.9304.90425.reportbug@localhost6.localdomain6



Bug#664181: Info received (RFS: trustmanager/3.0.5-1 [ITP])

2012-03-16 Thread Dennis van Dok
Sorry for not filling the template properly.


Here's the details:

* Package name: trustmanager
   Version : 3.0.5-1
   Upstream Author : Joni Hahkala joni.hahk...@cern.ch
 * URL : https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EGEE/TrustManager
 * License : Apache 2
   Section : java

Dennis




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f630100.50...@nikhef.nl



Bug#664165: RFS: not-yet-commons-ssl/0.3.9-2 [ITP]

2012-03-16 Thread Dennis van Dok
Op 16-03-12 00:26, I wrote:
 
   More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

I overlooked this snippet from the RFS template. You won't find much
information there :-).

The obvious place to look is of course: http://juliusdavies.ca/commons-ssl/

Cheers,

Dennis van Dok



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f6303d1.6040...@nikhef.nl



Re: qemubuilder - are there precompiled kernel-images with ipv6 and ext3 support built-in

2012-03-16 Thread Benoît Knecht
Björn Esser wrote:
 Am 15.03.2012 00:07, schrieb Benoît Knecht:
  Can't you just grab and unpack one of the prebuilt debian kernels
  from the archive? qemubuilder can load an initrd image, so even if
  ipv6 and ext3 are not built-in, it should work just fine.
 
 The prebuild kernels don't ship any initrd and I'm not sure how to build
 a suitable one on a different arch. Maybe there's some guide avail. for
 this.

Well, that might not be the fastest way, but the following works just
fine to generate the initrd; all you need is debootstrap, binfmt-support
and qemu-user-static installed (I will assume you want and armel
kernel/initrd in this example, but the same should apply for other
architectures):

  debootstrap --arch=armel --foreign --variant=minbase sid rootfs-armel-sid
  cp /usr/bin/qemu-arm-static rootfs-armel-sid/usr/bin/
  chroot rootfs-armel-sid/
  debootstrap/debootstrap --second-stage
  echo deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ sid main  etc/apt/sources.list
  apt-get update
  (You may want to mount /dev, /dev/pts /proc and /sys at this point.)
  apt-get install linux-image-versatile
  (And umount anything you mounted here.)
  exit

You should now have and initrd image in rootfs-armel-sid/boot/.

  If you don't have other architectures available, you could just have
  your package uploaded and see if it fails to build.
 
 I'm no dd so where can I upload and try to build it, but
 mentors.debian.net and wait until someone ITS it?

Yes, that's what I meant: have someone upload it for you, and then see
if anything fails. I don't think it's worth the trouble setting up qemu
images for every architecture supported by debian until you know there's
a problem, and have an idea of its nature. It might not even be able to
do anything about it if the problem is uninstallable dependencies.

  If it does, you'll have access to the full log, and then you can ask
  on one of the dedicated mailing lists; I'm sure there are developers
  with access to those machines who'd be happy to help.
 
 Where / How to get in touch with those developers?

For armel, debian-...@lists.debian.org. I'm sure the other
architectures have similar mailing lists.

Cheers,

-- 
Benoît Knecht


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120316113125.ga6...@marvin.lan



RFS: rarpd (orphaned)

2012-03-16 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear mentors,

this package was given up for adoption in March 2009.
It was orphaned in December 2011. On December 19th I
sent a message to the previous maintainer Janichi Uekawa
asking for any interest in acting on an RFS. No response
whatsoever has come out of that courtesy.

On January 27th, 2012, an RFS was sent to debian-mentors.
No response what so ever. Clearly the Debian project is no
longer able to sustain infra structure, preferring various
niche software for packaging.

Now I once more ask the general assembly for some interest
in attending to this combined ITA and RFS.

  rarpd - Reverse Address Resolution Protocol daemon

Information about this package is kept at

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/rarpd

It is downloadable in the following manner:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rarpd/rarpd_0.981107-8.dsc

The new packaging addresses the bugs, in addition to the ITA,

  #627907: rarpd writes out tons of 'recvfrom: Socket operation on non-socket'.

  #630612: rarpd package description to be changed.

Best regards,
  Mats Erik Andersson, DM

- End forwarded message -

-- 
Mats Erik Andersson, fil. dr
mats.anders...@gisladisker.se
2459 41E9 C420 3F6D F68B  2E88 F768 4541 F25B 5D41

Abonnerar på: debian-mentors, debian-devel-games, debian-perl,
  debian-ipv6, debian-qa


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120316113114.gb16...@mea.homelinux.org



Re: qemubuilder - are there precompiled kernel-images with ipv6 and ext3 support built-in

2012-03-16 Thread Björn Esser
Am 16.03.2012 12:31, schrieb Benoît Knecht:

 Well, that might not be the fastest way, but the following works just
 fine to generate the initrd; all you need is debootstrap, binfmt-support
 and qemu-user-static installed (I will assume you want and armel
 kernel/initrd in this example, but the same should apply for other
 architectures):

   debootstrap --arch=armel --foreign --variant=minbase sid rootfs-armel-sid
   cp /usr/bin/qemu-arm-static rootfs-armel-sid/usr/bin/
   chroot rootfs-armel-sid/
   debootstrap/debootstrap --second-stage
   echo deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ sid main  etc/apt/sources.list
   apt-get update
   (You may want to mount /dev, /dev/pts /proc and /sys at this point.)
   apt-get install linux-image-versatile
   (And umount anything you mounted here.)
   exit

 You should now have and initrd image in rootfs-armel-sid/boot/.

That did do the trick! Everything runs smooth and fine now.

Thanks a lot to you!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f6342bf.9070...@googlemail.com



Re: Advice on packaging libmusicbrainz4

2012-03-16 Thread Andy Hawkins
In article slrnjm45ev.h3c.a...@atom.gently.org.uk,
   Andy Hawkinsa...@gently.org.uk wrote:
 Hi again,
 In article 20120315002612.gm15...@ofb.net,
Nicholas Breennbr...@debian.org wrote:
 Does the old library still function with the MusicBrainz service?  If it's 
 just
 deadweight now, you could also work to transition all packages still using 
 the
 old library (there are four) to the new, request the removal of the old
 library, and then eventually take over the libmusicbrainz4-dev package name.

 The more I think about this, the more I think that it won't work anyway. I
 need to double check, but I think libmb2 used the RDF web service, that was
 removed when NGS was released.

Ok, it's official. Libmusicbrainz4c2a will no longer work. It used the old
RDF web service:

http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/?title=libmusicbrainzoldid=41766#Version_2.x

This version of the client library uses the old RDF web service and should
not be used in new development.

When NGS was introduced, the RDF web service was removed.

 If that's the case, what's the procedure for getting this 'old' libmb4
 package removed, and a new one put in its place?

I guess this is the key question now. What's the procedure for having all
the musicbrainz 2.x libraries (and their dependancies) removed from Debian?
Once they're removed, could I then use the libmusicbrainz4 name?

Cheers

Andy


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnjm6inb.ktf.a...@atom.gently.org.uk



Re: Advice on packaging libmusicbrainz4

2012-03-16 Thread Andy Hawkins
Hi,

In article slrnjm1f1u.6ts.a...@atom.gently.org.uk,
   Andy Hawkinsa...@gently.org.uk wrote:
 I am the author of libmusicbrainz4, a library to access the MusicBrainz
 service. There have been previous versions of this library in Debian, and I
 would like to get this new version included if at all possible.

I've since found out that tjaalton is already working on getting this
packaged and included.

It's probably best if I leave it to him, hopefully he can find a sponsor for
the package and get it included in the next release of Debian.

Now, I need to do the same for flactag. I'll start another thread for this.

Andy


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnjm6tln.tjn.a...@atom.gently.org.uk



Re: Advice on packaging libmusicbrainz4

2012-03-16 Thread Geoff
Hi Andy,

It looks like the issue got some attention yet.
Please refer to #656587

http://bugs.debian.org/656587

Cheers,
Geoff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f6379eb.7090...@free.fr



Re: Advice on packaging libmusicbrainz4

2012-03-16 Thread Andy Hawkins
Hi,
In article 4f6379eb.7090...@free.fr,
   Geoffmxondeb...@free.fr wrote:
 It looks like the issue got some attention yet.
 Please refer to #656587

 http://bugs.debian.org/656587

Yeah, just been talking on irc about this.

I think I'll drop my attempts to package the library, and get on with
packagine the application that uses it, flactag.

Thanks

Andy


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnjm6urg.vh4.a...@atom.gently.org.uk



Bug#663885: marked as done (RFS: googlefontdirectory-tools/20120309.1-1)

2012-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:16:50 +0100
with message-id 1331925410.5755.0.camel@mas
and subject line [Fwd: googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1_i386.changes 
ACCEPTED into unstable]
has caused the Debian Bug report #663885,
regarding RFS: googlefontdirectory-tools/20120309.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663885: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663885
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
thanks

Dear mentors and pkg-fontsers,

I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package googlefontdirectory-tools.

 * Package name: googlefontdirectory-tools
   Version : 20120111.1-1
   Upstream Authors: Dave Crossland
   : Khaled Hosny
 * URL : 
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/tools/
 * License : Apache-2.0  CC0
   Section : fonts

Binary package: googlefontdirectory-tools - various tools for generating, 
analysing and manipulating font files

Changes: 
 googlefontdirectory-tools (20120309.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
 - New otf2sfd script
 - New merge script
   * Source taken from mercurial revision 2275:af364e7c88e3
   * Set all python scripts as executable
   * Standards-Version 3.9.3
 - Set final DEP-5 Format: link
   * Add 'fonttools' dependency for setnonhinting-fonttools.py script
   * Use xz compression for source tarball

Lintian:

* On lintian = 1.5.6 this package has a bunch of
E: * missing-dep-for-interpreter fontforge = fontforge
Because it depends on fontforge-nox | fontforge and -nox wasn't added
as a valid interpreter for ff scripts in lintian before (#661363).

P: googlefontdirectory-tools: no-upstream-changelog
Yeah... No setup for existance outside the gfd VCS in this regard.

The package is available at mentors:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/googlefontdirectory-tools
  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/googlefontdirectory-tools/googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1.dsc

Alternatively the source is kept in git at:

  
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/googlefontdirectory-tools.git;a=tree
  git clone git://git.debian.org/pkg-fonts/googlefontdirectory-tools.git
(using a standard pristine-tar import-orig layout)


I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Thanks.

--
Martin Erik Werner martinerikwer...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
 Forwarded Message 
From: Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
To: Martin Erik Werner martinerikwer...@gmail.com, Debian Fonts Task
Force pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, bubu...@debian.org
Subject: googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
into unstable
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:02:48 +



Accepted:
googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1.debian.tar.gz
  to 
main/g/googlefontdirectory-tools/googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1.debian.tar.gz
googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1.dsc
  to main/g/googlefontdirectory-tools/googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1.dsc
googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1_all.deb
  to 
main/g/googlefontdirectory-tools/googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1_all.deb
googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1.orig.tar.xz
  to 
main/g/googlefontdirectory-tools/googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1.orig.tar.xz


Changes:
googlefontdirectory-tools (20120309.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * New upstream release
- New otf2sfd script
- New merge script
  * Source taken from mercurial revision 2275:af364e7c88e3
  * Set all python scripts as executable
  * Standards-Version 3.9.3
- Set final DEP-5 Format: link
  * Add 'fonttools' dependency for setnonhinting-fonttools.py script
  * Use xz compression for source tarball


Override entries for your package:
googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1.dsc - source fonts
googlefontdirectory-tools_20120309.1-1_all.deb - optional fonts

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
Martin Erik Werner martinerikwer...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
---End Message---


Processed: Re: Bug#663151: RFS: rhinote/0.7.4-2

2012-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'

 retitle 663151 RFS: rhinote/0.7.4-2 -- virtual sticky-notes for your desktop
Bug #663151 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: rhinote/0.7.4-2
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: rhinote/0.7.4-2 -- virtual sticky-notes for your 
desktop' from 'RFS: rhinote/0.7.4-2'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
663151: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663151
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133192679027618.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: Bug#663151: RFS: rhinote/0.7.4-2 -- virtual sticky-notes for your desktop

2012-03-16 Thread Andrea Bolognani
Hi mentors,

just a friendly bump so that you don’t forget the new and greatly
improved version of Rhinote is still waiting for a sponsor.

Please take a look at the package and consider uploading it.

Cheers!


On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 10:58:50PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:

 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: normal
 
 Dear mentors,
 
 I am looking for a sponsor for my package rhinote
 
   * Package name: rhinote
 Version : 0.7.4-2
 Upstream Author : Marv Boyes greysp...@tuxfamily.org
   * URL : http://rhinote.tuxfamily.org/
   * License : GPL-2+
 Section : x11
 
 It builds those binary packages:
 
   rhinote- virtual sticky-notes for your desktop
 
 To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
 URL:
 
   http://mentors.debian.net/package/rhinote
 
 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
 
   dget -x 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rhinote/rhinote_0.7.4-2.dsc
 
 More information about rhinote can be obtained from 
 http://rhinote.tuxfamily.org/ .
 
 Changes since the last upload:
 
   * 001-simplify-imports.diff:
 - improve the way modules are imported.
   * 002-use-secure-printfile.diff:
 - avoid potential symlink attacks and cluttering the user's home.
   * 003-test-for-external-commands.diff:
 - ensure external commands are available before calling them.
   * 004-use-popen.diff:
 - replace os.system() with the more secure subprocess.Popen().
   * 005-support-lp.diff:
 - add support for the lp command in addition to lpr.
   * 006-set-print-job-name.diff:
 - provide a descriptive name for the print job.
   * 007-set-class-name.diff:
 - set application name for use by window managers.
   * Simplify Depends: to cups-client | lpr.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no changes needed).
 
 The software has been heavily patched after Paul Wise has reviewed it[1]
 and found a bunch of issues with upstream’s code. He later took a look
 at the patches[2] and found them to be okay.
 
 
 [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00579.html
 [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/msg00077.html

-- 
Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org
Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#660519: Re[2]: Bug#660519: RFS: manaplus/1.2.2.19

2012-03-16 Thread andrei karas

Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:28:21 +0800 от Paul Wise p...@debian.org:
 On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:43 AM, andrei karas wrote:
 
...
  I removed most duplicates. Some left because this files accessed by physfs 
  and
  in physfs soft links not allowed. I allow it only for fonts enumeration.
 
 I see, please file a bug on physfs upstream about this issue.
DIsabled soft links i think is security feature from physfs. Possible allow 
soft links,
but i dont want do this without big reason.

...
  Some dont fixed other is by design in internal commands/events.
 
 Ah, OK. If you want to add an explanation for that you can override
 the lintian warning and add a comment in the override file.
 
It's only information message i prefer not add overrides to it.


 Here is an updated review:
 
 In the registration process there is an option for Male or Female. I
 would suggest removing that or adding an Other category since both
 gender and biological sex have more options than that. Often people
 who do not fit into either of these categories will be very offended
 to have to label themselves as Male or Female.
I can't remove this because it required by server. But i add Other gender
in next version. New value can work only in Evol Online server after next
server update.

 
 The initial download when logging into a server is quite big, is that
 a per-server thing like with web browsers or can it be added to
 Debian?
Yes, it's per server. Images, maps, tilesets, etc.
Possible in future i can package this files. Manaplus will use this files and
missing or new updates from server.

 
 The first line in debian/copright should point at this URL instead now:
 
 http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Fixed

 
 You might want to switch to debhelper compat 9 so that manaplus gets
 built with security hardening compiler flags. This is especially
 important since manaplus is a network client.
Thanks, switched.

link here: 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/manaplus/manaplus_1.2.3.4-1.dsc


Bug#664246: RFS: gm-assistant/1.1.1-1 [ITP]

2012-03-16 Thread Vincent Prat

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package gm-assistant

 * Package name: gm-assistant
   Version : 1.1.1-1
   Upstream Author : Simon Nicolasdramac.nico...@gmail.com   
Vincent Pratvincep...@free.fr

 * URL : http://vivicoder.github.com/GM-Assistant
 * License : GPLv3
   Section : games

  It builds those binary packages:

gm-assistant - Game Master assistant for role-playing games

  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  http://mentors.debian.net/package/gm-assistant


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gm-assistant/gm-assistant_1.1.1-1.dsc


  More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.


  Regards,
   Vincent Prat




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f63df03.3000...@free.fr



Bug#663532: marked as done (RFS: tth/4.03+ds-2 [updated packaging, hardening release goal] -- TeX/LaTeX to HTML converter)

2012-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2012 03:44:43 +0100
with message-id 4f63fa9b.60...@rezozer.net
and subject line uploaded: RFS: tth/4.03+ds-2 [updated packaging, hardening 
release goal] -- TeX/LaTeX to HTML converter
has caused the Debian Bug report #663532,
regarding RFS: tth/4.03+ds-2 [updated packaging, hardening release goal] -- 
TeX/LaTeX to HTML converter
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663532: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663532
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dearr Mentors:

I am looking for a sponsor for my package tth

* Package name: tth
  Version : 4.03+ds-2
  Upstream Author : Ian Hutchinson ihu...@mit.edu
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/tth/
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : tex

It builds those binary packages:

tth - TeX/LaTeX to HTML converter
tth-common - auxiliary softwares for TtH and TtM
ttm - TeX/LaTeX to MathML converter

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/tth

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this 
command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tth/tth_4.03+ds-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

* Bump debhelper build-dep to = 9.
* Bump Standards Version to 3.9.3.
* Hardened.
* Gather debian samples into debian/samples.

Best regards,
Jerome BENOIT


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

Hello There:

The package was uploaded.

Thanks,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT
jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net

---End Message---


Bug#660519: Re[2]: Bug#660519: RFS: manaplus/1.2.2.19

2012-03-16 Thread andrei karas

Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:28:21 +0800 от Paul Wise p...@debian.org:
 On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:43 AM, andrei karas wrote:
 
...
  I removed most duplicates. Some left because this files accessed by physfs 
  and
  in physfs soft links not allowed. I allow it only for fonts enumeration.
 
 I see, please file a bug on physfs upstream about this issue.
DIsabled soft links i think is security feature from physfs. Possible allow 
soft links,
but i dont want do this without big reason.

...
  Some dont fixed other is by design in internal commands/events.
 
 Ah, OK. If you want to add an explanation for that you can override
 the lintian warning and add a comment in the override file.
 
It's only information message i prefer not add overrides to it.


 Here is an updated review:
 
 In the registration process there is an option for Male or Female. I
 would suggest removing that or adding an Other category since both
 gender and biological sex have more options than that. Often people
 who do not fit into either of these categories will be very offended
 to have to label themselves as Male or Female.
I can't remove this because it required by server. But i add Other gender
in next version. New value can work only in Evol Online server after next
server update.

 
 The initial download when logging into a server is quite big, is that
 a per-server thing like with web browsers or can it be added to
 Debian?
Yes, it's per server. Images, maps, tilesets, etc.
Possible in future i can package this files. Manaplus will use this files and
missing or new updates from server.

 
 The first line in debian/copright should point at this URL instead now:
 
 http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Fixed

 
 You might want to switch to debhelper compat 9 so that manaplus gets
 built with security hardening compiler flags. This is especially
 important since manaplus is a network client.
Thanks, switched.

link here: 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/manaplus/manaplus_1.2.3.4-1.dsc


Bug#663015: marked as done (RFS: bibtool/2.54+ds-2 [updated packaging, hardening release goal] -- tool to manipulate BibTeX files)

2012-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2012 03:45:57 +0100
with message-id 4f63fae5.7090...@rezozer.net
and subject line UPLOADED: RFS: bibtool/2.54+ds-2 [updated packaging, hardening 
release goal] -- tool to manipulate BibTeX files
has caused the Debian Bug report #663015,
regarding RFS: bibtool/2.54+ds-2 [updated packaging, hardening release goal] -- 
tool to manipulate BibTeX files
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663015: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663015
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package bibtool

* Package name: bibtool
Version : 2.54+ds-2
Upstream Author : Gerd Neugebauer g...@gerd-neugebauer.de 
* URL : 
http://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool/index.en.html
* License : GPL-1+
Section : tex

It builds those binary packages:

bibtool- tool to manipulate BibTeX files

To access further information about this package, please visit 
the following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/bibtool

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using 
this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bibtool/bibtool_2.54+ds-2.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from 
http://www.example.com.

Changes since the last upload:

* Bump debhelper build-dep to = 9.
* Bump Standards Version to 3.9.3.
* Hardened.
* Fix a typo in debian/control Description.

Regards,
Jerome BENOIT


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

Hello There:

The package was uploaded.

Thanks,
Jerome

---End Message---