Bug#679107: RFS: mysql-cluster-7.2
Hi Bart, Yes, it's bug 560244 "ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster support" Regard, Steven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFiqYukvDMqZAmRv0EXLD1q0+H4sSL86MBgCfMa=4W=tvh=z...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]
Hi, > The upstream authors doesn't have this version available as tarball for > download, I had to create the tarball myself. The main differences > between the 0.1.1 stable version and this git commit is only about the > construct system: I have made some suggestions and they included it in > the repository after the 0.1.1 release. In this case you could just add the patch in your package. And in the next upload you will delete it. Also this patch may include only necessary changes, but not full diff after stable release. I often use such method in my packages. Regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/426951340787...@web27e.yandex.ru
Processed: retitle 672701 to clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 672701 clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP] Bug #672701 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: clearwaita-theme/1.0-1 [ITP] Changed Bug title to 'clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS: clearwaita-theme/1.0-1 [ITP]' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 672701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672701 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134079161110970.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]
José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: > El 26/06/12 17:36, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > I took a look at your package: > First of all, thanks for your quick answer :-) You're welcome :) > > - Since you're packaging a snapshot version, you should adjust your > > watch file accordingly: > > > > Processing watchfile line for package grive... > > Newest version on remote site is 0.1.1, local version is > > 0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e > > grive: remote site does not even have current version > The upstream authors doesn't have this version available as tarball for > download, I had to create the tarball myself. The main differences > between the 0.1.1 stable version and this git commit is only about the > construct system: I have made some suggestions and they included it in > the repository after the 0.1.1 release. I don't know how to write a > watch file for downloading a specific commit from a git repository. Is > it possible? I just meant that you should use something like opts=dversionmangle (see uscan(1)) so that uscan would remove the "+20120619git27g55c0f4e" part before comparing the debian version with the upstream one. But if you're not going to package snapshot versions on a regular basis, maybe that's not necessary. > > - It seems like all the source files of Grive are released under the > > GPL-2, and not GPL-2+ (according to the license headers in those > > files). You should correct that in debian/copyright, and using the > > same formulation as in the license headers seems like a good idea. > > > > The license for the debian/* files is said to be GPL-2+, but in the > > license paragraph it refers to the GPL-3. > > > > I couldn't find Matchman Green's name in any of the source files; > > are you sure they're one of the copyright holders? > Corrected the license issues (upstream to GPL-2, debian/* to GPL-3). > Matchman Green was the original upstream author when I began to follow > this project, but my e-mails and "real" contact with the project was > made through the other author: Nestal Wan. I will contact upstream again > and ask about this. Yeah, it seems best to discuss it with upstream. Regarding the GPL-3 for the packaging, since it's incompatible with the GPL-2, it would be much better if you agreed to GPL-2+ for debian/*; that way, the source package as a whole can be considered GPL-2. > > - debian/README.Debian should be debian/README.source, although I > > would argue it doesn't contain any useful information at the moment. > You are right: it doesn't contain any useful information. I think it is > a "legacy" file from the templates that I have written at the beginning > of the times :-) > > - In debian/control, the Vcs-Git field is intended for the packaging, > > not the upstream repository; if you don't have a public git > > repository for the Debian packaging, remove that line. > Ok, I have it on github, modified. > > The long description could be improved; please have a look at [1]. > > > > [1] > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-pkg-desc > > > > Please run wrap-and-sort from the devscripts package to have the > > Build-Depends field wrapped and sorted (and use ">= 9" for > > debhelper). > Do you mean ">=9" instead ">=9.0.0"? If it is, modified in that way. That's what I meant, yes. > > - Why do you override the hardening-no-fortify-functions lintian > > warning? If you have a good reason to do so, you should explain it > > in a comment in debian/grive.lintian-overrides. > I asked in debian-devel and in hardening-wrapper mailing lists about > that. I had this warning and, after checking with hardeining-check I saw > a possible problematic "read" unsafe call. I find it on the upstream > sources and see that it is safe to link against read instead read_chk, > because the always read the "sizeof" the reserved buffer. I will add a > comment about that. Perfect. > > - Grive includes a test suite, but it isn't built nor run. > I used their CMakeLists.txt without any patch or hack. I will ask them > about it and study the viability of adding to the Debian package > generation script and the way to do so. >From a quick look at the CMakeLists.txt, it seems that cppunit needs to be installed in order for the test suite to be built (so I guess you should Build-Depend on libcppunit-dev). Not sure if it means a simple "make test" would run the test suite then; looks like you'd have to run "./unittest" by hand. > > - In the grive(1) man page, you should end each item in the > > DESCRIPTION with punctuation. > > > > Mentioning that Grive is "for GNU/Linux systems" doesn't seem very > > useful; the person reading the man page is most likely doing so from > > such a system already. > > > > Grive shouldn't be italicized (.I) in the DESCRIPTION. > > > > Please consider removing the AUTHOR section (see man-pages(7) for >
Re: Bug#678914: RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2
Hi, Package updated and re-uploaded to mentors.debian.net to reflect the comment by Bart Martens: "The information of version 0.2.6-1.1 is missing in debian/changelog." Please, consider sponsoring. -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627111845.GA10686@kaiba.homelan
Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]
El 27/06/12 12:48, Benoît Knecht escribió: > I just meant that you should use something like opts=dversionmangle (see > uscan(1)) so that uscan would remove the "+20120619git27g55c0f4e" part > before comparing the debian version with the upstream one. But if you're > not going to package snapshot versions on a regular basis, maybe that's > not necessary. Ok, I will take a look again that option of the watch file, I have never seen before. I'll read carefully uscan man. > Yeah, it seems best to discuss it with upstream. Regarding the GPL-3 for > the packaging, since it's incompatible with the GPL-2, it would be much > better if you agreed to GPL-2+ for debian/*; that way, the source > package as a whole can be considered GPL-2. I don't know if there is a reason behind their choice of GPL-2 instead GPL-3... but I can ask them. If they prefer keeping on GPL-2, I can accept GPL-2+ for debian/* if it simplifies the licensing issues of the whole package. > From a quick look at the CMakeLists.txt, it seems that cppunit needs to > be installed in order for the test suite to be built (so I guess you > should Build-Depend on libcppunit-dev). Not sure if it means a simple > "make test" would run the test suite then; looks like you'd have to run > "./unittest" by hand. I have asked to upstream. Waiting their response about it, copyright holders and man page issues and keep you informed about all of these. > You don't have to increase the debian version until it actually gets > into the archive. Some people prefer to do so anyway, but that's > essentially a matter of taste (just provide a link to the .dsc file > every time you update the package). Seems to me that the common practice > is to keep the same debian version throughout the RFS process though. Ok, I agree with you. I will keep the same debian version. Best regards -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: new powertop version
Hello Gregor. > Uploaded now (to DELAYED/2); closing an RC bug and having a recent > powertop in Debian seem like two good reasons :) Thank you very much. With best regards, Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206271620.57864.jwollr...@web.de
Bug#673087: RFS: the-powder-toy/78.1-1 [ITP] -- Physics sandbox game
Hi Aditya, Aditya Vaidya wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "the-powder-toy" > * Package name: the-powder-toy > Version : 78.1-1 > Upstream Author : HardWIRED and respective owners > * URL : http://powdertoy.co.uk/ > > > * License : GPL-3 > Section : games > > It builds those binary packages: > > the-powder-toy - Physics sandbox game > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/the-powder-toy I wanted to review your package, so I tried building it from the git repository mentioned in debian/control [1] using git checkout upstream git checkout pristine-tar git checkout master git-buildpackage --git-pristine-tar --git-pbuilder but it failed with fatal: Path 'the-powder-toy_81.0.orig.tar.bz2.delta' does not exist in 'refs/heads/pristine-tar' pristine-tar: git show refs/heads/pristine-tar:the-powder-toy_81.0.orig.tar.bz2.delta failed gbp:error: Couldn't checkout "the-powder-toy_81.0.orig.tar.bz2": /usr/bin/pristine-tar returned 128 [1] git://github.com/kroq-gar78/The-Powder-Toy_deb.git It also looks like this repository was intended for the ubuntu package, so it probably shouldn't be mentioned in the debian/control file of the debian package. The version you linked to in this request [2] compiles and runs fine, but lintian reports a bunch of issues: W: the-powder-toy source: unknown-field-in-dsc original-maintainer I: the-powder-toy source: debian-watch-file-is-missing I: the-powder-toy: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/games/the-powder-toy/powder targetted targeted W: the-powder-toy: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/games/the-powder-toy/powder W: the-powder-toy: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/games/the-powder-toy/powder P: the-powder-toy: no-upstream-changelog I: the-powder-toy: unknown-field-in-control original-maintainer E: the-powder-toy: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format usr/share/pixmaps/powdertoy-48.png P: the-powder-toy: maintainer-script-without-set-e postrm P: the-powder-toy: maintainer-script-without-set-e postinst [2] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/the-powder-toy/the-powder-toy_78.1-1.dsc Since you've obviously kept working on the package, I thought I'd ask you if you wanted to submit a more current version before I go into a deeper review. Cheers, -- Benoît Knecht -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627143724.gb21...@marvin.lan
Bug#672701: RFS: clearlooks-phenix-theme/1.0 [ITP]
Hello, On Sun, 13 May 2012 01:16:40 +0200 Andrew Shadura wrote: > Source: clearwaita-theme > Description: Clearwaita theme > Clearwaita is a GTK2/GTK3 theme. Files for GTK3 are a modified > version of Adwaita, the default GNOME 3 theme, to make it visually > close to Clearlooks. Files for GTK2 come from the unmodified > Clearlooks theme. The package has been renamed upstream, it's now called Clearlooks-Phenix. For those who have missed the RFS last time: Clearlooks-Phenix is a GTK3 port of Clearlooks, the default theme for GNOME 2. Files for GTK3 correspond to significant changes of Adwaita, the default GNOME 3 theme. Files for GTK2 come from the unmodified Clearlooks theme. Details can be found here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/clearlooks-phenix-theme And, of course, here's a direct link to .dsc: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clearlooks-phenix-theme/clearlooks-phenix-theme_2.0.5-1.dsc I'd be really glad if someone uploaded this package, as I guess many people are going to miss Clearlooks with introduction of GTK+ 3. -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Processed: RFS: clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 672701 RFS: clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP] Bug #672701 [sponsorship-requests] clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]' from 'clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 672701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672701 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134081850923323.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: RFS: mysql-cluster-7.2/7.2.6+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 560244 by 679107 Bug #560244 [wnpp] ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster support Bug #585877 [wnpp] ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster support 560244 was not blocked by any bugs. 560244 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 560244: 679107 585877 was not blocked by any bugs. 585877 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 585877: 679107 > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 560244: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560244 585877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585877 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134081861124408.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Question regarding Standard-Versions
Hi everybody, my package is already in unstable/testing. No bugs, everything clean except (from packages.qa.debian.org): The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.3 instead of 3.9.2). So is it worth to bump the Standards-Versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3 and create a new package so that it's totally clean for the squeeze-freeze ? Thanks, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4feb6627.7090...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: Question regarding Standard-Versions
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:59:35PM +0200, Werner Detter wrote: > Hi everybody, > > my package is already in unstable/testing. No bugs, everything clean except > (from packages.qa.debian.org): > > The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy > (Standards-Version 3.9.3 instead of 3.9.2). > > So is it worth to bump the Standards-Versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3 and create > a new package so that it's totally clean for the squeeze-freeze ? If you would upload a new package with only that number changed, then it is, in my opinion, not worth the trouble. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627204555.gc10...@master.debian.org
Bug#679321: RFS: exactimage/0.8.7-1 [QA] -- fast image manipulation programs
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "exactimage". It builds those binary packages: edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer) exactimage - fast image manipulation programs exactimage-dbg - fast image manipulation library (debug symbols) libexactimage-perl - fast image manipulation library (Perl bindings) php5-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (PHP bindings) python-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (Python bindings) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/exactimage Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exactimage/exactimage_0.8.7-1.dsc Changes in the package: exactimage (0.8.7-1) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. * Update to stable release 0.8.7. * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.9.2). * File debian/copyright was updated in according to Copyright format 1.0. * Fixed lintian note quilt-patch-missing-description g++-4.7.patch. * Changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev. Build with libpng version 1.5.10 was tested successfully. (Closes: #662317) I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/861571340830...@web13f.yandex.ru
Re: Question regarding Standard-Versions
Hi, >> So is it worth to bump the Standards-Versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3 and create >> a new package so that it's totally clean for the squeeze-freeze ? > > If you would upload a new package with only that number changed, then it is, > in > my opinion, not worth the trouble. The only thing that would be changed is that number :) kind regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4feb759e.2080...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#679321: RFS: exactimage/0.8.7-1 [QA] -- fast image manipulation programs
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:51:01 you wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org > > Hi, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "exactimage". > > It builds those binary packages: > edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer) > exactimage - fast image manipulation programs > exactimage-dbg - fast image manipulation library (debug symbols) > libexactimage-perl - fast image manipulation library (Perl bindings) > php5-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (PHP bindings) > python-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (Python bindings) > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/exactimage > > Direct link for download: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exactimage/exactimage_0.8.7-1. > dsc > > Changes in the package: > > exactimage (0.8.7-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * QA upload. > * Update to stable release 0.8.7. > * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.9.2). > * File debian/copyright was updated in according to Copyright format 1.0. > * Fixed lintian note quilt-patch-missing-description g++-4.7.patch. > * Changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev. > Build with libpng version 1.5.10 was tested successfully. > (Closes: #662317) Why do you work against Daniel Stender? The newest version is already packaged in the experimental branch of http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/exactimage.git Your half backet release just works against him and makes everything more complicated as it needs to be -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3108999.upxsb9k...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org
Bug#679321: marked as done (RFS: exactimage/0.8.7-1 [QA] -- fast image manipulation programs)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:16:03 +0300 with message-id <826061340831...@web13e.yandex.ru> and subject line Re: exactimage: file format misdetection has caused the Debian Bug report #679321, regarding RFS: exactimage/0.8.7-1 [QA] -- fast image manipulation programs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 679321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679321 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "exactimage". It builds those binary packages: edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer) exactimage - fast image manipulation programs exactimage-dbg - fast image manipulation library (debug symbols) libexactimage-perl - fast image manipulation library (Perl bindings) php5-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (PHP bindings) python-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (Python bindings) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/exactimage Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exactimage/exactimage_0.8.7-1.dsc Changes in the package: exactimage (0.8.7-1) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. * Update to stable release 0.8.7. * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.9.2). * File debian/copyright was updated in according to Copyright format 1.0. * Fixed lintian note quilt-patch-missing-description g++-4.7.patch. * Changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev. Build with libpng version 1.5.10 was tested successfully. (Closes: #662317) I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Best regards, Boris --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, > Can you please coordinate your quest in http://bugs.debian.org/587062 Thanks a lot for a note. I have no intention to become the maintainer of this package. I've just prepared the QA upload. See my RFS: http://bugs.debian.org/679321 (Unfortunately I have no access to collab-maint yet, and I cannot commit to it directly. So I prepared the package in usual way.) > The new version is already packaged in the experimental branch of > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/exactimage.git Hmm, I saw only master branch and 0.8.5-4 tag there via web browser. But now I've cloned git repo and found experimental branch. So I'll just close my RFS. Best regards, Boris --- End Message ---
Bug#679321: Re: RFS: exactimage/0.8.7-1 [QA] -- fast image manipulation programs
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:18:14 Schrober wrote: > On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:51:01 you wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org > > > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "exactimage". > > > > It builds those binary packages: > > edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer) > > exactimage - fast image manipulation programs > > exactimage-dbg - fast image manipulation library (debug symbols) > > libexactimage-perl - fast image manipulation library (Perl bindings) > > php5-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (PHP bindings) > > python-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (Python bindings) > > > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > > following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/exactimage > > > > Direct link for download: > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exactimage/exactimage_0.8.7-1 > > . > > dsc > > > > Changes in the package: > > > > exactimage (0.8.7-1) unstable; urgency=low > > > > * QA upload. > > * Update to stable release 0.8.7. And why do you update to a new upstream version in an QA upload anyway? It the task of the ITA owner and not yours -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4670416.ripjvge...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org
Bug#677622: marked as done (RFS: dhelp/0.6.21 [ITA] -- Debian online help)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:27:03 +0300 with message-id <1340836023.17806.13.ca...@freedom.lan> and subject line RFS: dhelp/0.6.21 [ITA] -- Debian online help has caused the Debian Bug report #677622, regarding RFS: dhelp/0.6.21 [ITA] -- Debian online help to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 677622: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677622 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhelp": dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.6.21.dsc It builds these binary packages: dhelp - Debian online help More information about dhelp can be obtained from http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dhelp.git. Changes since the last upload: dhelp (0.6.21) unstable; urgency=low * New maintainer: Georgios M. Zarkadas (Closes: #650441). * Support other web servers in addition to apache2 (Closes: #669041). * Support apache2 packaging transition for version 2.4 (Closes: #669758). * Support new ruby packaging policy transition for Wheezy. * Support new layout of man2html cgi scripts for Wheezy. * Keep supporting previous policies/layouts, either during build time or during runtime, to aid backporting. * Man and info pages links are activated only if associated packages are installed on the system. * Subsections now show in the sections list only if section is selected. * New color, styles and icons themes. * Package installation now does not fail if cache data cannot be generated during install. * Fix some minor lintian warnings. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3. -- Georgios M. Zarkadas Tue, 12 June 2012 21:50:00 +0300 regards George Zarkadas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- The package has been uploaded to archive (cf. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678055). regards George Zarkadas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message ---
Bug#679335: RFS: glipper/2.3-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glipper" * Package name: glipper Version : 2.3-3 Upstream Author : Laszlo Pandy * URL : https://launchad.net/glipper * License : GNU GPL v2 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: glipper- Clipboard manager for GNOME To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/glipper Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/glipper/glipper_2.3-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * debian/patches: - Add ctrl_c_item-is-None.patch (LP: #904367) Regards, -- José Ernesto Dávila Pantoja - Fingerprint: 42F6 CCA0 22B2 B64C 131D AA9C 5943 CDFE 99BC D948 - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagcdkncrspfyg+0o4csgpaaxehkphienuae7jwkl4mjamvm...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#679342: RFS: qemplayer/12.5-1.1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qemplayer" * Package name : qemplayer Version : 12.5-1.1 Upstream Author : William Brana * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/qemplayer/ * License : GPL Section : video It builds those binary packages: qemplayer - file-manager-like GUI front-end to MPlayer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/qemplayer Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qemplayer/qemplayer_12.5-1.1.dsc Regards, William Brana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caj7jcmm2jqtohjgylth9segjvnafdmbzzc0ncqsvofbbrok...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bzr-email" * Package name: bzr-email Version : 0.0.1~bzr58-1 Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd * URL : https://launchpad.net/bzr-email * License : GPL-2+ Section : vcs It builds those binary packages: bzr-email - Notification email plugin for Bazaar To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bzr-email Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bzr-email/bzr-email_0.0.1~bzr58-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: bzr-email (0.0.1~bzr58-1) unstable; urgency=low * New Maintainer. (Closes: #668266) * Suggests mailx. (Closes: #626490) * Sync with upstream repository. regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cam0xxk_perotomz7zfxhmxpv+7bpjreg1y8m-1lqkr7xiee...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Question regarding Standard-Versions
Werner Detter writes: > So is it worth to bump the Standards-Versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3 and > create a new package so that it's totally clean for the squeeze-freeze > ? I don't think so. I take that notice as something to be done as part of the next release of the package; it's not worth making a new package *only* for that change. In other words: it's not a bug, not even a wishlist one. It's good housekeeping. -- \ “A hundred times every day I remind myself that […] I must | `\ exert myself in order to give in the same measure as I have | _o__)received and am still receiving” —Albert Einstein | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87a9zos2fe@benfinney.id.au
Processed: bzr-email: block ITA 668266 by RFS 679344
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 668266 by 679344 Bug #668266 [wnpp] ITA: bzr-email -- Notification email plugin for Bazaar 668266 was not blocked by any bugs. 668266 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 668266: 679344 > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 668266: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668266 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134086404221305.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: retitle to RFS: taskcoach/1.3.16-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 663431 RFS: taskcoach/1.3.16-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager Bug #663431 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- friendly task manager Changed Bug title to 'RFS: taskcoach/1.3.16-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager' from 'RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- friendly task manager' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 663431: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663431 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134086404221318.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: qemplayer: block ITP 679336 by RFS 679342
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 679336 by 679342 Bug #679336 [wnpp] ITP: qemplayer -- File-manager-like GUI front-end to MPlayer 679336 was not blocked by any bugs. 679336 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 679336: 679342 > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 679336: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679336 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134086404221344.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#679201: marked as done (RFS: mysqltuner/1.2.0-1 [ITA])
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:14:02 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: mysqltuner/1.2.0-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #679201, regarding RFS: mysqltuner/1.2.0-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 679201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679201 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mysqltuner". * disclaimer * This is not a hijacking. I've contacted current maintainer (CC-ing), and kindly replied as welcome taking over. So, I think this RFS will save our trouble (to orphan and ITA it). * Package name: mysqltuner Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Major Hayden * URL : http://mysqltuner.com * License : GPL-3 Section : admin It builds those binary packages: mysqltuner - high-performance MySQL tuning script To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mysqltuner Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mysqltuner/mysqltuner_1.2.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://mysqltuner.com. Changes since the last upload: mysqltuner (1.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New Maintainer. * New upstream release. (Closes: #629652) * New Standards-Version: 3.9.3 * New Source format: 3.0 * debian/copyright: switch to DEP-5. * debian/rules: switch to dh7. * debian/watch: add. regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package mysqltuner version 1.2.0-1 is in unstable now. --- End Message ---
Bug#678914: marked as done (RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:14:00 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #678914, regarding RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 678914: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678914 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of my package "fuse-convmvfs". This upload enables for build on kFreeBSD (Bug #634216). Kudos to Robert Millan for providing a patch. Related changes: fuse-convmvfs (0.2.6-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: - applied patch from Robert Millan to allow for kfreebsd-* architectures (Closes: #634216). - bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3. * debian/compat: - bumped to 9 to enable hardening flags in dh. The package is lintian-clean and builds and installs fine on kFreeBSD. You can get it from mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fuse-convmvfs The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs_0.2.6-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Stanislav --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package fuse-convmvfs version 0.2.6-2 is in unstable now. --- End Message ---
Bug#670334: RFS for package in NEW
Hello, I see that this package is in NEW. http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html Does this mean that this RFS can be closed now ? Or is this RFS meant to replace the package in NEW ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120628062402.gb17...@master.debian.org
