Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.3.1+dfsg-1 (for experimental)
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Since the upstream project recently published the new version 1.3.1 of ViennaCL, I rebased the packaging I have done so far for viennacl/1.3.0+dfsg-1 onto the work I have done for 1.2.0-2 and uploaded the resulting viennacl/1.3.1+dfsg-1 to debian.mentors.net. The new upstream version contains all patches I submitted to the upstream project, so I was able to remove them all (except the one dealing with the DFSG-cleaning). As usual, you can find more info here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/viennacl And download the package with dget from this URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/v/viennacl/viennacl_1.3.1+dfsg-1.dsc Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/502df30c.20...@users.sourceforge.net
Processed: Retitle for new upstream version
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 665354 RFS: viennacl/1.3.1+dfsg-1 (for experimental) Bug #665354 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: viennacl/1.3.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental) Changed Bug title to 'RFS: viennacl/1.3.1+dfsg-1 (for experimental)' from 'RFS: viennacl/1.3.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665354: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665354 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13451886815074.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
[poke] RFS: xinetd
Greetings could someone sponsor this upload to experimental? So at least i would become responsible for the package and receive emails for bugs. http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/ Thanks -- Salvo Tomaselli signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [poke] RFS: xinetd
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:49:40AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: Greetings Greets! could someone sponsor this upload to experimental? So at least i would become responsible for the package and receive emails for bugs. http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/ As a xinetd (sometimes) user, I'm interested in it's fate. Thanks for wanting to help take over a less-glamorous package, for the betterment of Debian! Thanks -- Salvo Tomaselli In your changelog, I'd add a ~exp1 or so to the version string. The version you have now is perfect for unstable, but we're not going there :) Usually, in the changelog, you should mention, well, changes made -- Rater then something like: * Correct typo in README.Debian (Closes: 611637) * Defaults to rsyslog (Closes: #526923) I'd prefer something like: * Changed the typo for - foo in README.Debian (...) * I changed the default logger in $FILE from blerg to rsyslogd (...) The idea is I should be able to get back to where you were before. Usually I prefer lines not going over 80 chars in the debian/rules (see: line 7) - you can wrap lines with a backslash (\) The line: debhelper ( 9.0.0) should be changed to something like: debhelper (= 9) See jwilk's (small) rant on this subject[1]. In your xinetd.d/* files, you've got a mess of spaces (spaces all the way to 80 chars) over all your curly braces You should consider adding a watch file :) You should also consider DEP3 headers on 07-CVE-2012-0862.patch Lintian complaints: usr/sbin/xconv.pl -- does this need to have the .pl extention for legacy issues? etc/init.d/xinetd -- You should add LSB headers usr/share/man/man5/xinetd.conf.5.gz -- mispelling: avaliable available You've also got a ton of FSSTND-dir-in-manual-page tags being emited, the manpage might nice to fix :) You've also got a possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration -- it might be seeing the debian/xinetd.org-FAQ.html being put in. It'd be nice to register this with doc-base, but it's not the end of the world. (you should try running Lintian (with something like -IE --pedantic) on the .changes *after* a build as well ;) ) This diff is, well, massive, so it's going to take some time to look over. Looks like some files are getting thrown around. I'll have to review that in detail, but today, i've got a lot of work stuff. Q'plah, (and thanks again), Paul [1]: http://jwilk.net/blog/20120710-debhelper-build-dependencies -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [poke] RFS: xinetd
Hello, i've done some changes basing on your notes. In your changelog, I'd add a ~exp1 or so to the version string. The version you have now is perfect for unstable, but we're not going there Changed The idea is I should be able to get back to where you were before. I tried to be a bit more verbose on the changelog Usually I prefer lines not going over 80 chars in the debian/rules (see: line 7) - you can wrap lines with a backslash (\) Uhm right, sorry about that The line: debhelper ( 9.0.0) should be changed to something like: debhelper (= 9) Fixed In your xinetd.d/* files, you've got a mess of spaces (spaces all the way to 80 chars) over all your curly braces Uhm true, done You should consider adding a watch file :) I didn't think it was necessary since it looked like completely abandoned for years.. now someone new took over the developement so i guess a watch file is needed. Added. (i haven't packaged yet the new version because it would take some time to repatch it and it doesn't seem there were any major changes). You should also consider DEP3 headers on 07-CVE-2012-0862.patch Added subject and submitter usr/sbin/xconv.pl -- does this need to have the .pl extention for legacy issues? Well i don't think changing a script's name is a good idea, there will probably be a few people upset about that! etc/init.d/xinetd -- You should add LSB headers They were there, the description was missing usr/share/man/man5/xinetd.conf.5.gz -- mispelling: avaliable available done, and changed some - into \- You've also got a ton of FSSTND-dir-in-manual-page tags being emited, the manpage might nice to fix :) Uhm i fail to understand what is this error about. You've also got a possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration -- it might be seeing the debian/xinetd.org-FAQ.html being put in. It'd be nice to register this with doc-base, but it's not the end of the world. I tried to create a doc-base control file and install it and so on but i still get the warning. (you should try running Lintian (with something like -IE --pedantic) on the .changes *after* a build as well ;) ) Well i didn't know lintian could parse changes files too Let me know about the patches. I've uploaded the corrected version http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14-8~exp1.dsc Thanks for the help. -- Salvo Tomaselli signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: dpkg-source aborting due to unexpected upstream changes when run inside pbuilder
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 08:51:58AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: The problem is Makefile files that are regenerated by configure called in the clean target. That these files are patched by debian/patches/debian-changes-* is another problem, caused by this one. Sounds like a situation where I would get rid of the patch and switch to dh-autoreconf. The patch is already dropped in sid, in fact it was never needed, it's just the older dpkg being helpful and generating a crappy patch for you. The (older) package runs ./configure; make clean in the clean target while dh-autoreconf IIUC used for removing changes made in build targets. The current package replaces clean with distclean and doesn't have any problems with repeated builds. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#685180: RFS: sniffit/0.3.7.beta-17
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sniffit * Package name: sniffit Version : 0.3.7.beta-17 Upstream Author : Brecht Claerhout * URL : http://reptile.rug.ac.be/~coder/sniffit/ * License : GPL Section : net It builds those binary packages: sniffit- packet sniffer and monitoring tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sniffit Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sniffit/sniffit_0.3.7.beta-17.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: Acknowledge NMU. + Thanks Aron Xu. Added a patch to enable hardening options. (Closes: #649817). + Thanks Simon Ruderich. Added a patch to fix spelling error on binary. Fixed spelling error on debian/README.Debian. Regards, William Vera -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/capqrxnk74tus4sgqxdztcgrh9outjnr_tmg6b-o-p4t3x_2...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#685180: RFS: sniffit/0.3.7.beta-17
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.) * William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx, 2012-08-17, 13:16: * URL : http://reptile.rug.ac.be/~coder/sniffit/ This redirects to http://helpdesk.ugent.be/webhosting/rugac.php, which says: The Domain name rug.ac.be will be discontinued as of september 1, 2009. From then on only UGent.be can be used. Please replace rug.ac.be by UGent.be in the URL. More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Oh really? :) -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120817183219.ga4...@jwilk.net
Bug#685180: RFS: sniffit/0.3.7.beta-17
William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx writes: * URL : http://reptile.rug.ac.be/~coder/sniffit/ The Domain name rug.ac.be will be discontinued as of september 1, 2009. From then on only UGent.be can be used. Please replace rug.ac.be by UGent.be in the URL. -- http://helpdesk.ugent.be/webhosting/rugac.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84d32pl618@sauna.l.org
Bug#685180: RFS: sniffit/0.3.7.beta-17
Hi! On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote: William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx writes: * URL : http://reptile.rug.ac.be/~coder/sniffit/ The Domain name rug.ac.be will be discontinued as of september 1, 2009. From then on only UGent.be can be used. Please replace rug.ac.be by UGent.be in the URL. -- http://helpdesk.ugent.be/webhosting/rugac.php Yep, it's a old and obsolete URL, I just sent a message in LinkedIn to upstream, but I don't have response yet. I hope update the data soon. Regards -- William Vera | bi...@billy.mx Systems Engineer / Consultant IT / Sysadmin PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439 4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPQrxN+N9Uhkj=g2uMLd+VPf-OA+ux=vn7dMm6=odlwogum...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#684792: RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-4 [RC]
* Bart Martens ba...@debian.org [120817 21:46]: The information in debian/copyright is not yet complete, see for example the file src/egg/eggcolumnmodel.c. I updated debian/copyright (DEP-5 and up-to-date information) and reuploaded the package at the same URL : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gmpc/gmpc_11.8.16-4.dsc Thank you ! -- Etienne Millon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120817214854.GA16143@klow
