Bug#726490: sponsorship-requests: ethstatus/0.4.4 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors I am looking for a sponsor for my package ethstatus: * Package name: ethstatus Version : 0.4.4 Upstream Authors : Gabriel Montenegro johnpetru...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : https://github.com/aborrero/pkg-ethstatus * License : GPL Section : net It builds the following binary packages: ethstatus - console-based ethernet statistics monitor My packaging attempt is available here: https://github.com/aborrero/pkg-ethstatus.git Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer. (Closes: 677768) * Fixed Makefile LDFLAGS. (Closes: 641381) * Upstream is the same as Debian maintainer. Therefore, build a native Debian package. * Update Standars-Version to 3.9.4. * Bump compat to 9. * Code cleanup. * Fixed several lintian warnings. Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131016085714.4656.27735.report...@r2d2.cica.es
Bug#726512: RFS: freexl/1.0.0f-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for my package freexl. Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this transition: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2013/10/msg9.html Package name: freexl Version : 1.0.0f-1 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri a.furi...@lqt.it URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/freexl/ License : MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0+ or LGPL-2.1+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libfreexl-dev - library for direct reading of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets - devel libfreexl1 - library for direct reading of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets libfreexl1-dbg - library for direct reading of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets - debug To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/freexl Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freexl/freexl_1.0.0f-1.dsc More information about FreeXL can be obtained from https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/freexl/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version. * Add myself to Uploaders. * Update watch file, handle common mistakes. * Use dh-autoreconf for retooling. * Update Homepage URL. * Use canonical URLs for Vcs-* fields. * Multi-Arch: same dev and dbg packages. * Add lintian overrides for no upstream changelog, link to upstream timeline. * Update copyright file. * Move maintenance from collab-maint to pkg-grass. Regards, Sebastiaan Couwenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131016105508.1175.85414.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl
Bug#726514: RFS: readosm/1.0.0b+dfsg1-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for my package readosm. Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this transition: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2013/10/msg9.html Package name: readosm Version : 1.0.0b+dfsg1-2 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri a.furi...@lqt.it URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/readosm/ License : MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0+ or LGPL-2.1+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libreadosm-dev - simple library to parse OpenStreetMap files - headers libreadosm-doc - simple library to parse OpenStreetMap files - documentation libreadosm1 - simple library to parse OpenStreetMap files libreadosm1-dbg - simple library to parse OpenStreetMap files - debug symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/readosm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/readosm/readosm_1.0.0b+dfsg1-2.dsc More information about ReadOSM can be obtained from https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/readosm/. Changes since the last upload: * Add myself to Uploaders. * Use canonical URLs for Vcs-* fields. * Update copyright file. * Add dependency on libjs-query for doc package. * Use dh-autoreconf for retooling. * Update watch file, handle common mistakes. * Add Multi-Arch control fields. * Add lintian overrides for no upstream changelog, link to upstream timeline. * Add build dependency on graphiz, dot is used to generate documentation. * Move package maintenance from pkg-osm to pkg-grass. Regards, Sebastiaan Couwenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131016110719.3235.15873.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl
Re: Gitorious and debian/watch file
Thanks for your help. Gitorious watch service will be nice on alioth, but I don't know if is possible. Anyway, I will try to contact upstream gitorious team, to add this feature. Best regards. -- Cordialement, Blanc Pierre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOGTLeLwx6pv4jtZdmyZ++dn9M2zf=ud0xA3Md7wbB9HiH=w...@mail.gmail.com
debian/watch: Version based on file timestamp
Hi, for the geoip-database package I would like to add a watch file. The problem is: there are no real releases, so I am manualy monitoring the required files. Is it possible to get the upstream version of the remote file based on it's modified tag? e.g.: http://geolite.maxmind.com/download/geoip/database/GeoIPCountryCSV.zip The required format is: MMDD -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/ E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/525e8a42.4020...@debian.org
Bug#719920: RFS: gramps/3.4.1-0.3 [NMU]
Hi, I did sponsor this package but have two remarks: 1. I see no real point to choose *-0.3 as version number (instead of say *-0.1) 2. I'd be in favoud of maintaining the package in collab-maint. Kind regards and thanks for your work on this Andreas. On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:18:44PM +0200, Ross Gammon wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I have not been actively looking for a sponsor for my package gramps the last few weeks because I have found a few other Debian things to keep me busy :-) But this weekend I have gone back to the package I had on Mentors.net and updated it a little. It now includes a patch to force a UTF-8 locale for people that try to run Gramps without a UTF-8 default locale and get a very nasty crash. I also upgraded the copyright file to a machine readable version. Before I start looking for a sponsor again, I wonder if anyone on the mentors list would like to give me a quick review of the package? * Package name: gramps Version : 3.4.1-0.3 Upstream Author : Gramps Project * URL : http://gramps-project.org/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : gnome It builds those binary packages: gramps - Genealogical research program To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gramps Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gramps/gramps_3.4.1-0.3.dsc Regards, Ross Gammon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSWrm9AAoJEFP+e72miRD8UFoP/3Xd83HqVewvDu7/I90Tm3UZ ZNjWvI76/3uRQIYUOs2yKmvSxgohev9YYHklrIWDPDpMKWXS/dOvmGEMyXchRDbU rcrh0Cr4dvLw2qk+gtcOTLudwLb4AzvrzpdbEFLN4qF9hv9fw5Q7Bnq7zXIrsfmK uijgyeIuSC/954FeMjE3cGACD6ednGzcDHntVno8RN34326AZ56Va49OnIInEbK6 M+GzZ1VscQ9MF2/SF1phZAsgBSTqgpAI73V0OtaM8f1A5jJV0iW31FdHkiRXofHJ csHa9RJZvyrtKShHIyHaYPO6YqlC5Kw7k8TEuebxX5Lwdt9g7v7fn11SaYZnoZvE MjzUiv1Vw+Meoi6vs/iTYo5QQzjg8d7Huy9jNAORw1zT5UvE8eWiGE2Eq+FoC2va g4dRbLOBT42WtaVUppNWEgS3yLFouUnSwndQ6xZwN83OLDIhzIjLobwK0wSjrmUY EjR9DqF/7hBoPsNCkZm66EdyXOPUnyxhbQ3+KB7K56PWTMWBNFd3CcTLhV/PoGHM jnif8gBTj5/QCjef3ES2nRPMyg+MEyRL0UBpOFF5kcaiU1EhQdMkCA0OjJVFKQGx hNtd4Zl5vd/iXIjEoRHKro/Iw18+cuucGQDE4lrXQK32kryuFwQ84KoB43q/x9r1 NlQOYMCDgWUqOnp3UBHk =g1Ok -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/525ab9d4.3070...@mail.dk -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131016125456.gf32...@an3as.eu
Bug#726512: marked as done (RFS: freexl/1.0.0f-1)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:59:54 +0200 with message-id 525e8dca.4040...@xs4all.nl and subject line Upload sponsored has caused the Debian Bug report #726512, regarding RFS: freexl/1.0.0f-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 726512: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726512 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for my package freexl. Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this transition: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2013/10/msg9.html Package name: freexl Version : 1.0.0f-1 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri a.furi...@lqt.it URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/freexl/ License : MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0+ or LGPL-2.1+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libfreexl-dev - library for direct reading of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets - devel libfreexl1 - library for direct reading of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets libfreexl1-dbg - library for direct reading of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets - debug To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/freexl Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freexl/freexl_1.0.0f-1.dsc More information about FreeXL can be obtained from https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/freexl/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version. * Add myself to Uploaders. * Update watch file, handle common mistakes. * Use dh-autoreconf for retooling. * Update Homepage URL. * Use canonical URLs for Vcs-* fields. * Multi-Arch: same dev and dbg packages. * Add lintian overrides for no upstream changelog, link to upstream timeline. * Update copyright file. * Move maintenance from collab-maint to pkg-grass. Regards, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- The upload was sponsored by Andreas Tille, many thanks!---End Message---
Bug#726514: marked as done (RFS: readosm/1.0.0b+dfsg1-2)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:59:52 +0200 with message-id 525e8dc8.50...@xs4all.nl and subject line Upload sponsored has caused the Debian Bug report #726514, regarding RFS: readosm/1.0.0b+dfsg1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 726514: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726514 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for my package readosm. Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this transition: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2013/10/msg9.html Package name: readosm Version : 1.0.0b+dfsg1-2 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri a.furi...@lqt.it URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/readosm/ License : MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0+ or LGPL-2.1+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libreadosm-dev - simple library to parse OpenStreetMap files - headers libreadosm-doc - simple library to parse OpenStreetMap files - documentation libreadosm1 - simple library to parse OpenStreetMap files libreadosm1-dbg - simple library to parse OpenStreetMap files - debug symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/readosm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/readosm/readosm_1.0.0b+dfsg1-2.dsc More information about ReadOSM can be obtained from https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/readosm/. Changes since the last upload: * Add myself to Uploaders. * Use canonical URLs for Vcs-* fields. * Update copyright file. * Add dependency on libjs-query for doc package. * Use dh-autoreconf for retooling. * Update watch file, handle common mistakes. * Add Multi-Arch control fields. * Add lintian overrides for no upstream changelog, link to upstream timeline. * Add build dependency on graphiz, dot is used to generate documentation. * Move package maintenance from pkg-osm to pkg-grass. Regards, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- The upload was sponsored by Andreas Tille, many thanks!---End Message---
Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am a DM, maintaining the zeroinstall-injector package. I have split it into separate packages to avoid pulling in GTK on headless servers. This saves around 100 MB when deploying to a fresh server. Could someone check it and approve the new package names? My previous mentor (Jens Peter Secher) is no longer a DD. * Package name: 0install Version : 2.3.3-2 Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard tal...@gmail.com * URL : http://0install.net/ * License : GNU Lesser General Public License 2.1 Section : admin It now builds these binary packages: 0install - cross-distribution packaging system 0install-core - cross-distribution packaging system (non-GUI parts) zeroinstall-injector - transitional package for 0install I updated the name as injector is no longer used, and the main command is now 0install. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/0install Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/0/0install/0install_2.3.3-2.dsc More information about 0install can be obtained from http://0install.net Regards, Thomas Leonard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cag4opy_8jad3ma4hmn4wxulk_f_g5hifee7bbc9vueyoeeq...@mail.gmail.com
possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
Is my understanding correct, in that the upstream author needs to add the OpenSSL exception to the upstream license before I can package? I tried twice to contact upstream to add that exception, but didn't get any response: https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen/issues/36 Does that mean, the package can't make it into debian? Or can I add the excpetion myself, assuming since the author chose to link agains openssl, he is ok with it? Rgds Richard signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Richi Lists ricu...@gmail.com schrieb: Or can I add the excpetion myself, assuming since the author chose to link agains openssl, he is ok with it? Definitely not. Upstream did not link against it - you do that. - -nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid iQFNBAEBCgA3BQJSXqDrMBxEb21pbmlrIEdlb3JnZSAobW9iaWxlIGtleSkgPG5p a0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlPgAKCRAvLbGk0zMOJUyBB/4nF2MtEQPAJ9fqaFqVUsjB qCAUap2K0PAUcp06o7xrWGfH1xFIXEnYawCblq1uCl41Mzg9b3gjlPS6SxmvKDQR 7X7fwsCTUHQIC5XqEI2ibqdM6ytCv63fvdC8KzsU9BP4LOk4kTk29bz5CgYFUT2E 8rgZZ2VIlVM30Rjp0HRBYsWLcFcg6Qu4ISzGnz0LjICOntsWMvUqxT6M0MaGZd0G UdVz5vUbVQImX4YuLnFz0A5uwW5OVUyVYtuQsbLx8jSIVxcQ/LPqfpU1t4LMLtgE 0qWSMwgR/Xsyl6mDJZ17G0V2ALu3gTAd2q3kRbfnmXggF9gSGgypqboy/alIu21G =F1a7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8489add1-8d30-427e-85bd-33535b5f4...@email.android.com
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
On 10/16/2013 10:21 AM, Dominik George wrote: Richi Lists ricu...@gmail.com schrieb: Or can I add the excpetion myself, assuming since the author chose to link agains openssl, he is ok with it? Definitely not. Upstream did not link against it - you do that. The upstream README on GitHub states that At present, vanitygen can be built on Linux, and requires the openssl and pcre libraries. The INSTALL file lists OpenSSL 1.0.0d as a prerequisite. Some of the includes in the source files explicitly and unconditionally reference headers under the openssl/ hierarchy. I can see where this might not be enough to allow adding the license exception without an explicit statement from upstream, but at least to my eye, it does seem to contradict the notion that upstream did not link against [OpenSSL]. -- The Wanderer Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with any side of it. Every time you let somebody set a limit they start moving it. - LiveJournal user antonia_tiger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/525ea451.4080...@fastmail.fm
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 10:36 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: I can see where this might not be enough to allow adding the license exception without an explicit statement from upstream, but at least to my eye, it does seem to contradict the notion that upstream did not link against [OpenSSL]. Maybe upstream never linked the code at all or used a mock implementation that only provides the openssl interface without functionality ;) The real issue is, who linked the binary that gets distributed, and therefore, who has to comply with the GPL, and this is not the upstream author. To rephrase Dominik's comment: Upstream did not link openssl against the binary that will get distributed, the package maintainer does that. my 0.02€ regards, Gert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
On 10/16/2013 11:08 AM, Gert Wollny wrote: On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 10:36 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: I can see where this might not be enough to allow adding the license exception without an explicit statement from upstream, but at least to my eye, it does seem to contradict the notion that upstream did not link against [OpenSSL]. Maybe upstream never linked the code at all or used a mock implementation that only provides the openssl interface without functionality ;) Upstream provides pre-built Win32 binaries, and the Windows build instructions are where the OpenSSL prerequisite is stated; it seems highly likely that those pre-built binaries are linked against OpenSSL. Your point in the rephrasing is taken, however. -- The Wanderer Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with any side of it. Every time you let somebody set a limit they start moving it. - LiveJournal user antonia_tiger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/525eade2.6030...@fastmail.fm
Re: debian/watch: Version based on file timestamp
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:44:50PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Hi, for the geoip-database package I would like to add a watch file. The problem is: there are no real releases, so I am manualy monitoring the required files. Is it possible to get the upstream version of the remote file based on it's modified tag? e.g.: http://geolite.maxmind.com/download/geoip/database/GeoIPCountryCSV.zip The required format is: MMDD I don't think it's possible to do it using just uscan. What would be possible is for you - or somebody else - to write some kind of a redirector and host it somewhere; the redirector would fetch upstream's webpage and return an HTML page containing a link to a file with the timestamp in the name. It is possible that the same redirector would have to implement the other part of the functionality - upon a request for the file with the timestamp in the name, it would fetch the real file from upstream and serve it as, well, the file with the timestamp in the name. It might be prudent to also implement some kind of local caching to prevent resource exhaustion DoS problems on too many almost-simultaneous requests. It doesn't sound too hard; if nobody else steps up, I may try to write something like this. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org p.penc...@storpool.com PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 What would this sentence be like if pi were 3? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:18:20PM +0200, Richi Lists wrote: Is my understanding correct, in that the upstream author needs to add the OpenSSL exception to the upstream license before I can package? ... which also requires consent of all copyright holders I tried twice to contact upstream to add that exception, but didn't get any response: https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen/issues/36 Does that mean, the package can't make it into debian? Or can I add the excpetion myself, assuming since the author chose to link agains openssl, he is ok with it? No, you can't just change a license of software. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Gert Wollny gw.foss...@gmail.com schrieb: The real issue is, who linked the binary that gets distributed, and therefore, who has to comply with the GPL, and this is not the upstream author. To rephrase Dominik's comment: Upstream did not link openssl against the binary that will get distributed, the package maintainer does that. Thanks, that's exactly what I was intending to say :)! Sorry if my wording was unclear. The point is that the GPL does not, or better, cannot, limit the original author's rights, and so it would be perfectly OK if they distributed their own binaries they linked against OpenSSL while still noone else is allowed to do so. That said, I my personal opinion is that doing the above is plain nonsense from a FOSS point of view, and if upstream's intention is to produce open software, they have to respond to the license issue. To make the other part clear: You must not distribute GPL code linked against OpenSSL if the exception is missing, so it cannot enter Debian, neither main nor one of the other suites. Cheers, Nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid iQFNBAEBCgA3BQJSXrXDMBxEb21pbmlrIEdlb3JnZSAobW9iaWxlIGtleSkgPG5p a0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlPgAKCRAvLbGk0zMOJfgDCACsPiAQ6oUx2mtA6JGfcyqD 9XmoXQQTxuQn7M6i5xcKVjS0ebPThDu/L7UFa2/M1aQQRMzKPEhG/t4WZT/dfYHZ eWHAfBxE2zpo8sg+I/9ryIj2BTDDQJDDE8a7dlCE1sviBC0vuMYFNgIt03NfpBl2 p9pBIRaeLVitFqPMcRduaVNQIkIJG+XVexs+QFl/R2ymxOU2gYePxP7sdHxawDEr 6Q2nDUATB8DBJE4CAvkPeX55ExZxJMlqIk+yYHLUWYTcjmOin9dR88fJOq5zCjPw 8WoSI+arSzLjvc7AmDpViht8T8PL/XCJJsTBWZSCPuqsblTN/O1JgrAiN87Ei7g3 =eLIW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ff2758-054c-446d-b129-6dc893070...@email.android.com
Re: debian/watch: Version based on file timestamp
Hello, On 16/10/13 17:27, Peter Pentchev wrote: On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:44:50PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Hi, for the geoip-database package I would like to add a watch file. The problem is: there are no real releases, so I am manualy monitoring the required files. Is it possible to get the upstream version of the remote file based on it's modified tag? e.g.: http://geolite.maxmind.com/download/geoip/database/GeoIPCountryCSV.zip The required format is: MMDD I don't think it's possible to do it using just uscan. What would be possible is for you - or somebody else - to write some kind of a redirector and host it somewhere; the redirector would fetch upstream's webpage and return an HTML page containing a link to a file with the timestamp in the name. It is possible that the same redirector would have to implement the other part of the functionality - upon a request for the file with the timestamp in the name, it would fetch the real file from upstream and serve it as, well, the file with the timestamp in the name. It might be prudent to also implement some kind of local caching to prevent resource exhaustion DoS problems on too many almost-simultaneous requests. It doesn't sound too hard; if nobody else steps up, I may try to write something like this. An other possibility is to write to the upstream maintainer to ask for a versioned source tarball from his/her side. hth, Jerome G'luck, Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/525eb742.1000...@rezozer.net
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de writes: That said, I my personal opinion is that doing the above is plain nonsense from a FOSS point of view, and if upstream's intention is to produce open software, they have to respond to the license issue. Unfortunately, upstreams don't necessarily see it that way. I've seen upstreams just refuse to add the license exception on the grounds that they think Debian's concern is silly and they refuse to cater to it. *sigh* -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871u3lfbp6@windlord.stanford.edu
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Russ Allbery r...@debian.org schrieb: Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de writes: That said, I my personal opinion is that doing the above is plain nonsense from a FOSS point of view, and if upstream's intention is to produce open software, they have to respond to the license issue. Unfortunately, upstreams don't necessarily see it that way. I've seen upstreams just refuse to add the license exception on the grounds that they think Debian's concern is silly and they refuse to cater to it. *sigh* Hmm, then their stance on open source and licensing is silly and wie cannot distribute the code. Sad but true, what can you do :). FOSS needs careful licensing, not caring does not help the community. - -nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid iQFNBAEBCgA3BQJSXrqRMBxEb21pbmlrIEdlb3JnZSAobW9iaWxlIGtleSkgPG5p a0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlPgAKCRAvLbGk0zMOJZ+SCACuI7lElxMairQbd8zHABln OngcpsaM7ncN4CMn/e5AKlSNchrIqrH8j2tLLfSCFxHbxIIDBVci7aaTGhzRVLXV 8srV7jbJ8dpuz5Xn88AvLUgez9zaPlAgx19FVkwMjfryq2EHMZeJ0gHIW2q+PGBf GAVcTTnjqhpvaMfrSFzyv0b9CVaeMgMDsCR+E+7WM5i4veVGnxyhH9n8/eKskCC0 mGIjp3pKjWO7+Oq/bejFSIMS6roiYsH2qra6NJ8bg7RLuG5EhUTXDhf02mpdMf2O b7BZBZZNVpXuwf+COxN8jQUFxzqxTPKV00oXzhW3DA9FAE29YtBI/I0Y/I3xY4DK =F7Ft -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0d8a9378-6052-4a89-ae45-6946965c7...@email.android.com
Bug#719920: RFS: gramps/3.4.1-0.3 [NMU]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks Andreas:-) 1. Unless I missed something, mentors.debian.net forces subsequent uploads to have the version incremented. So that would mean doing it right first time! 2. Good idea. I will start the process right away. Regards, Ross On 10/16/2013 02:54 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I did sponsor this package but have two remarks: 1. I see no real point to choose *-0.3 as version number (instead of say *-0.1) 2. I'd be in favoud of maintaining the package in collab-maint. Kind regards and thanks for your work on this Andreas. On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:18:44PM +0200, Ross Gammon wrote: Dear mentors, I have not been actively looking for a sponsor for my package gramps the last few weeks because I have found a few other Debian things to keep me busy :-) But this weekend I have gone back to the package I had on Mentors.net and updated it a little. It now includes a patch to force a UTF-8 locale for people that try to run Gramps without a UTF-8 default locale and get a very nasty crash. I also upgraded the copyright file to a machine readable version. Before I start looking for a sponsor again, I wonder if anyone on the mentors list would like to give me a quick review of the package? * Package name: gramps Version : 3.4.1-0.3 Upstream Author : Gramps Project * URL : http://gramps-project.org/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : gnome It builds those binary packages: gramps - Genealogical research program To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gramps Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gramps/gramps_3.4.1-0.3.dsc Regards, Ross Gammon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/525ab9d4.3070...@mail.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSXrhxAAoJEFP+e72miRD8dZMQAJR+CWaqEdUw7R3i+ZGhUhSY aICTu/tc8jQw1CtS4Qy15u8aoRqWdc2DDPChPnJWb010wvHjVM1NBkZlOKpnkCIm uFuES+TLqo3v4nrgPyL/8JreaVo/ZkfJ+ObGYPe9+lNWmiPVV9PnThVj+AwZ1LyX xV+s/vlLBqIIXM92sBbv141mRxsJ8L/Hh8grDFU1bN/ec7QCCyhUMNXanpUb2ZoS cfaafkR4ndrbHzq1//eT2iPUaCZRvd6978lmqx+vjNh6J7LLu1BdLfOb2oFUltJK EbZ2qVTmF1tHd0l7lX8Cff0y6/+F1JnrOEC7z916yp0ZEgTQWkvpWMmgaZoZN81I RuJ6OaENazmI1wlX90RCbHrPhpzy3J4qH/qiQeqaWcrJwimRargHnD9uP4QB5B15 L2xxkvyC7cQ0AncLfLrGkqxUPpKn7H7/Kbt5ajlP7QEclzSK3rfjaPjWhE2uNMj9 Cs+g870kLZdFHZygiOIKoD2gyZ6ZmrSW6hzI+0Q9GzI71/CI7MfMKj67TIj6Cl19 7v8LS7CupS3lHB5t2k1LIPPB0VeWtoje4hNGrMcownUDIzXttwFMH12MAnk28GpM s9LwidcE5W0Xe9P2J7e+UfutCeWkhmMBlkK7uFUtDxfWj1n+w7qVoyyU/OfUkD8p UITnSlVDpXdLsRZfOUxs =OKTp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/525eb886.7060...@mail.dk
Bug#719920: marked as done (RFS: gramps/3.4.1-0.3 [NMU])
Your message dated Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:24:00 + with message-id e1vwtta-0002ns...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: gramps/3.4.1-0.3 [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #719920, regarding RFS: gramps/3.4.1-0.3 [NMU] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 719920: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719920 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gramps * Package name: gramps Version : 3.4.1-0.2 Upstream Author : Gramps Project * URL : http://gramps-project.org/ * License : GPLv2 Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: gramps - Genealogical research program To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gramps Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gramps/gramps_3.4.1-0.2.dsc More information about gramps can be obtained from: http://gramps-project.org/ Changes since the last upload: This is a non-maintainer upload of the next version of gramps in response to #718852. A watch file has been added as requested in this bug. This version of gramps corrects an error causing the family order to be incorrect on xml export. Other information: The current maintainer does not seem to be active any more, and the MIA team has been contacted. I am happy to work with upstream to deal with any bugs until the situation is resolved. Regards, Ross Gammon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSDoCzAAoJEFP+e72miRD8k7IP/RwWWeOVvUAv83Y7HifzWdd1 mkucg6hOqtwFc7KEFoAggymts5NICpXvx3mqCEUe6XERC5eYJcJMoAvM1x53sF3+ vLuci5YUQ4u5zHY0WkeMaHFpaErPiL1hYmsfxwpTkyIAGPbm1bYOs1V3A//sBYhS Gt5xmZYTMXeSE7lG/xPPS2HE50s7YKvppKEqbXYij5Fr6cFxVCbMBXZpIafzOxKP 0EOUblDE1fuxh117R6eZMKoZNV9vAX2f6DBybpZnLLntNuY8wXUhG3Rf/I+cvcaK JxyqluHni6qzI2/MA5dlQbjsgKL69PPBXbGzdFSjBJzO7P3YtVZzHlecP5A/VQI1 pZjy3UyL0rWzQCblU5s6G4lNyfa2jWsny2+/d0CLGc4bS6XbCeB1yB/jA/OCQYH9 4r16E2q7iH34ahciOXmwU+awQHpGNYK19yoXWY4Ds3m6wFgCfA4JsZR0w/DxzvWB a7i56KXG2rs4zlTqJml8Ce9y6Q6rRzFc0WAI4xqxgFehHnTyniE8inTHbWr0QzQU 27MH0cHm82AehCiZPyegFwIRwjcLflvzQx1YYlbG8jHl0tlWnf+gw0HHV/7tWoVI itD1XrwN34jkuID6YXZtQVi/0ar9EPNR+bUjoLheu+2x11Zcw1Saqu3njJ1krICJ iIRFUvKI0ASeLOA1O5P+ =1oRL -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package gramps version 3.4.1-0.3 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/gramps---End Message---
Bug#717822: marked as done (RFS: nlopt/2.3+dfsg-2 [RC])
Your message dated Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:24:00 + with message-id e1vwtta-0002ng...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: nlopt/2.3+dfsg-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #717822, regarding RFS: nlopt/2.3+dfsg-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 717822: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717822 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nlopt * Package name: nlopt Version : 2.3+dfsg-2 Upstream Author : Steven G. Johnson stev...@alum.mit.edu * URL : http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt * License : BSD Section : math Closes bugs : 697638 It builds those binary packages: libnlopt-dev - nonlinear optimization library -- development package libnlopt-guile0 - nonlinear optimization library -- Guile bindings libnlopt0 - nonlinear optimization library octave-nlopt - nonlinear optimization library -- GNU Octave package python-nlopt - nonlinear optimization library -- Python bindings To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/nlopt Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nlopt/nlopt_2.3+dfsg-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: [ Tim Gardner ] * Add 04-python-includes.patch to detect correct include python paths (Closes: #697638) [ Sergey B Kirpichev ] * Removed debian/docs * Drop unused override for octave-nlopt: missing-dependency-on-libc * Bump up Standards-Version (to 3.9.4) * Ignore shared libraries in nlopt-python (fix postinst/rm-has- useless-call-to-ldconfig lintian warning's) [ Christophe Trophime ] * Updated patches following DEP3 (python-includes.patch, configure.patch and swig.patch) [ Sergey B Kirpichev ] * Added Forwarded: headers for patches 01-03 * Set octave-nlopt priority (optional - extra), according to the policy * Unfuzz patches with quilt refresh -pab --no-index --no-timestamps --diffstat * Renamed patches (foo_bar.patch - foo-bar.patch, git-format-patch's default naming scheme) * Added missing Forwarded: headers for debian/patches/* * Point to related bug for python-includes.patch * Drop unused override for libnlopt-guile0 Regards, Sergey B Kirpichev ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package nlopt version 2.3+dfsg-2 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/nlopt---End Message---
Re: Bug#719920: RFS: gramps/3.4.1-0.3 [NMU]
On 2013-10-16 at 18:02:14 +0200, Ross Gammon wrote: 1. Unless I missed something, mentors.debian.net forces subsequent uploads to have the version incremented. So that would mean doing it right first time! it's not mentors that forces it, it's dput: if the package hasn't been uploaded to the repositories yet you can just delete the $PKG_NAME$VERSION.mentors.upload file and reupload on mentors -- Elena ``of Valhalla'' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131016180448.ga12...@virginsteele.home.trueelena.org
Re: Bug#719920: RFS: gramps/3.4.1-0.3 [NMU]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/16/2013 08:04 PM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: On 2013-10-16 at 18:02:14 +0200, Ross Gammon wrote: 1. Unless I missed something, mentors.debian.net forces subsequent uploads to have the version incremented. So that would mean doing it right first time! it's not mentors that forces it, it's dput: if the package hasn't been uploaded to the repositories yet you can just delete the $PKG_NAME$VERSION.mentors.upload file and reupload on mentors Thanks - I should have asked here at the time :-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSXtprAAoJEFP+e72miRD84VsP/RUCwuUZsr/vQ7Y0sOprPLlh v13JA45cytBd6Ol3IjDQxnPbFpfPicOZP7seXhKG79fKa+1BeAlYhUdi9oq6cvEP rmnZK60bA6BTE6qAw8a9lJ8Dx8/jlsj07tBYu7LYL/0Q0D+Fq75oZDP4ktCRH+R+ Gv5yJZnAxv15mR4rCrZyDJUTK93vO0yXDE3Z2OlH3du0gv82fwfeG03HV4Zb6PGr DLY1rANJnrnQSQpMUd8l4RHAib+1kjr3fGpLORHvV6qNR9UtSo+n6hFnDczDZffq Fbk6/z+WbsH2a9FbT0W4MvxIvFdn7MSW44MqTWz7kpQ7czjTK1n/CndDqi2vkqqd hQGAzXTxFSv4LVzSClVqXMKBT1CFKPsQ8yfseflQZTXxYboeZGwemiLmDCmptBjP LhCYHVKxqTCRnvV5vv5npfoQoqv6r8Qr+t7mW0HsQXbuikHUxPJc039MskfwRW/M ipYeeuDsLZyRb9fBZbXJSGMTJXxT/Nm+r0uldtgQ5KI+vFlPsDJpXBc1LcMD4rcw Houp8/rwvfoo0PrbvhMQp6835wqieI4Mn21M4YqA1CD2ODHzIzCFhEwjwcrZmK6y 0QWEsxbZjo0bosaAXonCBhjvai4+EUzvFlIuHKqaBQ0Exm/MDx/8+MYbXxmo6rwz 7bSSQ/qU+KQP2j3pcjOj =kObn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/525eda85.2020...@mail.dk
Bug#721369: marked as done (RFS: libsfml/2.1+dfsg-2)
Your message dated Thu, 17 Oct 2013 04:23:33 + with message-id e1vwf7v-xv...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: libsfml/2.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #721369, regarding RFS: libsfml/2.1+dfsg-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 721369: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721369 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libsfml * Package name: libsfml Version : 2.1+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Laurent Gomila laurent@gmail.com * URL : http://www.sfml-dev.org/ * License : zlib Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libsfml-audio2 - Simple and Fast Multimedia Library - Audio part libsfml-dev - Simple and Fast Multimedia Library - Development Files libsfml-doc - Simple and Fast Multimedia Library - Documentation libsfml-graphics2 - Simple and Fast Multimedia Library - Graphics part libsfml-network2 - Simple and Fast Multimedia Library - Network part libsfml-system2 - Simple and Fast Multimedia Library - System part libsfml-window2 - Simple and Fast Multimedia Library - Window part libsfml2-dbg - Simple and Fast Multimedia Library - Debug Symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libsfml Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsfml/libsfml_2.1+dfsg-1.dsc -- This is a repackage of SFML to update it to version 2.1 (from 1.6). SFML 2 has been discussed in bug #706001 The git repository where the package was developed is here: https://github.com/jcowgill/debian-sfml Regards, James Cowgill ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package libsfml has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
