Bug#764150: Copyright of debian/* in proj?

2014-10-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

I was stumbling about the extraordinary size of
proj_4.9.0~rc2-1~exp1.debian.tar.xz and noticed that it contains
large files debian/datumgrids*.  While README.source gives some
hint I think d/copyright deserves some information.  Besides the
fact that the debian packaging in itself does not fit what the

   Files: *

section says an additional remark would be helpful.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141006063756.gb10...@an3as.eu



Bug#763513: RFS: i2util/1.2-1 [ITP]

2014-10-06 Thread Raoul Borenius
Andrey,

On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:49:07AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
  
  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/i2util/i2util_1.2-1.dsc
 I don't think you need 
 
 DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
 include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk
 
 with compat 9, is there any reason for those lines?

No, you're absolutely right. Fixed version is on mentors.

 Thanks,
   Raoul


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU

2014-10-06 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Hi,

 You should sometime read them

I have already read them many times in random order;
I will browse those again from start to begin to see if i missed
something important.
 
 As [1] is emtpy, I will be a little more verbose below, apologizes if I
 tell you something you already know.

Indeed. I have till now very little experience with packaging.
I just built some dummy ones with equivs.

 - Change the Orphaning Bug to an Intent-To-Adopt-Title (ITA:) one and
 set yourself as owner (see https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#howto-o
 and https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control; bts(1) is also a useful
 tool for manipulating bug status)

Done, I wish I knew bts existed before.

 - Close the Bug in your d/changelog. (some entry like New maintainer
 (Closes: #763888) -- (d/ is short for the debian/ directory in your
 package)
Ok

 - Set yourself as Maintainer in d/control (and remove the likely
 inactive Uplpoader; he can be added in case of again)
Ok

  I already solved 3 bugs, they will be automaticaly closed by the amended 
  changelog.
 Thats the way to go. If you like, you can also tag those bugs pending
In fact, those fixes are already included in the last upload from Marcin
that is already in sid.


(cruft-ng)
 Just one remark: Depends should be only used when
 appropriate -- refer to Policy §7.2  -- so only if cruft-ng requires
 cruft to operate)
It does well requires all the _rules_ from the explain/  filters-unex/
directories. The proper way to do it would be to have an
arch-indepedant cruft-data package with theses rules,
with two arc-dependant cruft  cruft-ng that depend on this.

Though, this is much work; I guess that people willing to rewrite
cruft could also just do a git clone ; cd ; make to try it out.

 NM is to become a DD.
Ok, I mixed it up; I thought taht was needed to recognize the gpg key.

 (Lintian Error )
 This error will go away after you adopted the package (as described
 above)
 
Ok

 - d/changelog:
 
 There was an upload Oct3 - you need to rebase your d/changelog to
 include the changes from 0.9.17
 (skip the unreleased nmu)

Ok, I did the rebase, the nmu is gone

 Standard Version 3.9.6 is out ;-)
Ok

 Regarding VCS-*, they need some update as you need to keep them actual
Marcin transfered me the root GitHub repository 
after I deleted my fork, I adapted the URL everywere.

 (Note: Seems that Marcin did not push the tag for 0.9.17 -- please make
 sure to tag this release. Tool recommendation: git-buildpackage

I set the tag.

 - d/copyright
 
 Comment: should go, not needed.
 
 You need to add your name to the * section
 (as you are also becoming upstream, I guess. Its a native package
 afterall :))
Ok, I just didn't want to rush it/hurt people feelings;
It's nothing technical. This is correct now.

I removed the links to the wiki  alioth page;
those are not much usefull anyway.

 - d/cruft.lintian-overrides
 Please remove the lines when no longer needed, not just only comment it.
Ok

 - d/docs is empty
 Remove file if not needed.
Ok
 
 - d/dirs *might* not be needed, as debhelper will create the dirs for
 you usually. So check if can be cleaned up
I've forgotten this little bit in my last upload to mentors.
Only the empty folders should be there. (/var/...  /etc...)

 
 Ok, the list is not really long. Good job!
 Please update the package, replay to this mail and say what you changed,
 put it to mentors, and give me a ping.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/cruft - 2014-10-06 05:09
 
 
 --
 Tobi
Thanks for the review

Alexandre


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/3197009.dka1B10lbq@antec



Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU

2014-10-06 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Monday, den 06.10.2014, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Detiste:
  Ok, the list is not really long. Good job!
  Please update the package, replay to this mail and say what you changed,
  put it to mentors, and give me a ping.
 https://mentors.debian.net/package/cruft - 2014-10-06 05:09
  

Ähm, there is an lintian error.. 
orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders

The reason is that your d/control should read: 

Maintainer: Alexandre Detiste alexandre.deti...@gmail.com

(Remove Uploaders!)

Please reupload

NOTE: I'm on vacation starting from tomorrow. So only a few hours left
before I need to pause sponsoring (until Oct 18)

(I will in parallel check the rest of the package)


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU

2014-10-06 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Monday, den 06.10.2014, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Detiste:
 Hi,

 
  - Change the Orphaning Bug to an Intent-To-Adopt-Title (ITA:) one and
  set yourself as owner (see https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#howto-o
  and https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control; bts(1) is also a useful
  tool for manipulating bug status)
 
 Done, I wish I knew bts existed before.
 
  - Close the Bug in your d/changelog. (some entry like New maintainer
  (Closes: #763888) -- (d/ is short for the debian/ directory in your
  package)

Not what I meant. It's still a QA-Upload they way you writing it in
d/changelog but you are adopting. Write:

cruft (0.9.18) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New Maintainer (Closes: #763888)
  * Overhaul ruleset for recent kernels  systemd
(...)
  * Closes: #702853 : explain cgroups,devtmpfs and other special fs
  * Bump DebHelper compat from 5 to 9

(note the line removed in the last section)

 
  - Set yourself as Maintainer in d/control (and remove the likely
  inactive Uplpoader; he can be added in case of again)
 Ok

See previous mail with the lintian error.

 
   I already solved 3 bugs, they will be automaticaly closed by the amended 
   changelog.
  Thats the way to go. If you like, you can also tag those bugs pending
 In fact, those fixes are already included in the last upload from Marcin
 that is already in sid.

If they already closed by a previous, the approach is different:
Manually close them by sending a mail to xx-d...@bugs.debian.org and
noteing with the Fixed command (see
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#fixed )

Do not close bugs in the changelog when it not the new version that
fixes it!

 
 (cruft-ng)
  Just one remark: Depends should be only used when
  appropriate -- refer to Policy §7.2  -- so only if cruft-ng requires
  cruft to operate)
 It does well requires all the _rules_ from the explain/  filters-unex/
 directories. The proper way to do it would be to have an
 arch-indepedant cruft-data package with theses rules,
 with two arc-dependant cruft  cruft-ng that depend on this.

Good idea, and thats not so much work to do it, if you just need to copy
files into a different package. (dsclaimer: i didn't check if my claim
is right in this case).
But lets keep that on the TODO for the moment, and talk about that when
introducing cruft-ng, as there is no need before that.

 Though, this is much work; I guess that people willing to rewrite
 cruft could also just do a git clone ; cd ; make to try it out.
 
  - d/dirs *might* not be needed, as debhelper will create the dirs for
  you usually. So check if can be cleaned up
 I've forgotten this little bit in my last upload to mentors.
 Only the empty folders should be there. (/var/...  /etc...)

You did not touch that file...

As said, if you are quick, I will upload today. (Otherwise after my
VAC.)

--
tobi


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU

2014-10-06 Thread Alexandre Detiste

I fixed the changelog, I only kept what was really fixed in 0.9.18 

   - d/dirs *might* not be needed, as debhelper will create the dirs for
   you usually. So check if can be cleaned up
  I've forgotten this little bit in my last upload to mentors.
  Only the empty folders should be there. (/var/...  /etc...)
 
 You did not touch that file...

Removing any line from d/dirs breaks the build;
I reverted changes to this file.

 As said, if you are quick, I will upload today. (Otherwise after my
 VAC.)

Ok thanks, theres is a new upload on mentors.d.o


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#763810: marked as done (RFS: cruft/0.9.18 NMU)

2014-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:49:28 +0200
with message-id 1412614168.14482.11.ca...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU
has caused the Debian Bug report #763810,
regarding RFS: cruft/0.9.18 NMU
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
763810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763810
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I am looking for a sponsor for my updated cruft package.

This includes fixes for all the changes that happened since 2011,
like devtmpfs, systemd, ...

 * Package name: cruft
   Version : 0.9.16+nmu1
   Upstream Author : Marcin Owsiany porri...@debian.org
 * URL : https://github.com/a-detiste/cruft
 * License : no change
   Section : admin

Here is a colordiff:
  https://github.com/porridge/cruft/pull/3/files

  It builds those binary packages:

cruft - program that finds any cruft built up on your system

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/cruft

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cruft/cruft_0.9.16+nmu1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.


-- System Information:
Distributor ID: Raspbian (also applicable for vanilla Debian)
Description:Raspbian GNU/Linux testing (jessie)
Release:testing
Codename:   jessie
Architecture: armv6l

Kernel: Linux 3.12.28+ (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Am Monday, den 06.10.2014, 18:17 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Detiste:
 I fixed the changelog, I only kept what was really fixed in 0.9.18 
 
- d/dirs *might* not be needed, as debhelper will create the dirs for
you usually. So check if can be cleaned up
   I've forgotten this little bit in my last upload to mentors.
   Only the empty folders should be there. (/var/...  /etc...)
  
  You did not touch that file...
 
 Removing any line from d/dirs breaks the build;
 I reverted changes to this file.
 
  As said, if you are quick, I will upload today. (Otherwise after my
  VAC.)
 
 Ok thanks, theres is a new upload on mentors.d.o

uploaded. Thanks for your contribution!

-- 
tobi


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
---End Message---


Bug#763513: RFS: i2util/1.2-1 [ITP]

2014-10-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 08:38:41AM +0200, Raoul Borenius wrote:
   dget -x 
   http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/i2util/i2util_1.2-1.dsc
  I don't think you need 
  
  DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
  include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk
  
  with compat 9, is there any reason for those lines?
 
 No, you're absolutely right. Fixed version is on mentors.
Thanks, uploaded.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#764261: RFS: librocket/1.3-1 [ITP]

2014-10-06 Thread whey bags
Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: wishlist
  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package librocket

 * Package name: librocket
   Version : 1.3-1
   Upstream Author : CodePoint Ltd, Shift Technology Ltd, and contributors
 * URL : http://librocket.com
 * License : MIT
   Section : libdevel

  It builds those binary packages:

librocket  - User interface middleware package based HTML and CSS
 librocket-dev - librocket devel package
 librocket-python - librocket python support package

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/librocket


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libr/librocket/librocket_1.3-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

Initial release


  Regards,
   Tom Mason


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAMK3W+TvCH8rG0_ZvC1i5AZOo6PwEkn=-lxkcljqfr1zosf...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#764271: RFS: libgaiagraphics/0.5-3 [RC]

2014-10-06 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgaiagraphics

 Package name: libgaiagraphics
 Version : 0.5-3
 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri a.furi...@lqt.it
 URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libgaiagraphics/index
 License : LGPL-3.0+
 Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

 libgaiagraphics-dev  - Gaia common graphics support - development headers
 libgaiagraphics1 - Gaia common graphics support
 libgaiagraphics1-dbg - Gaia common graphics support - debugging symbols

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgaiagraphics


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgaiagraphics/libgaiagraphics_0.5-3.dsc

More information about libgaiagraphics can be obtained from 
https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libgaiagraphics/index.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Change build dependency from libjpeg8-dev to libjpeg-dev for jpeg-turbo
transition. (closes: #763479).
  * Drop lintian override for no-upstream-changelog, shouldn't override
pedantic tags.
  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20141006184024.9011.94280.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl



Bug#762189: Bug#742344: Info received (Inclusion of German debconf template translation possible?)

2014-10-06 Thread Daniel Lintott
Hi Helge

On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:50:41PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
 Hello Daniel,
 on September 19th you marked this translation bug pending. Any ETA for
 an upload?
 
 Or should I arrange for an NMU?
 

I have prepared a QA upload which includes all the new debconf translations
and submitted an RFS [1] to both debian-mentors and debian-qa, but have 
received 
no feedback on this.

Hopefully this ping may trigger, a DD to look at the prepared package and upload
it!

Regards,

Daniel Lintott

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762189 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141006211705.ga26...@mail.serverb.co.uk



Bug#764261: RFS: librocket/1.3-1 [ITP]

2014-10-06 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Hi Tom!

Thanks for packaging librocket for Debian.  I've got a couple things for
you to fix as the next steps.

1. You should delete all of those .ex files in the debian directory.
Those are just examples of things that you might need to do.

2. Your changelog should close an ITP bug - in your case, #764252.

3. If you are using compat = 9 (which you should!), you need to depend
on debhelper = 9.

4. Your VCS fields contain a repository which doesn't exist.  You should
setup the collab-maint repository and push the packaging's git
repository there.

5. Your standards version isn't the latest version - you should update
it to 3.9.6.

6. Your packages should have a short description and a longer
description that should be enough information for a user to decide
whether they want to install the package.  Check out Debian Policy 3.4
for more details there.

7. Your patches are missing DEP-3 headers; check out the patch tagging
guidelines at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/.

Lintian is a very helpful tool for finding some of these problems, and
has more than I detailed above, as well as some general warnings that
might point to bigger problems.  I recommend it highly; it's saved my
butt on many an occasion!

Thanks again for your help packaging librocket for Debian; when you've
got another upload that fixes the problems, send the bug a mail and
someone will swing by and take another look.

Sincerely,

-- 
Harlan Lieberman-Berg
~hlieberman


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1412648016.4070.6.ca...@gmail.com



Bug#763513: marked as done (RFS: i2util/1.2-1 [ITP])

2014-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Oct 2014 04:24:42 +
with message-id e1xbmki-0008ms...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: i2util/1.2-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #763513,
regarding RFS: i2util/1.2-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
763513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763513
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package i2util

 * Package name: i2util
   Version : 1.2-1
   Upstream Author : Aaron Brown aa...@internet2.edu
 * URL : http://software.internet2.edu/sources/I2util/
 * License : Apache License, Version 2.0
   Section : libdevel

It builds those binary packages:

i2util-tools - Internet2 utility tools
libi2util-dev - Internet2 utility library (development files)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/i2util


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/i2util/i2util_1.2-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

Changes since the last upload:

  Initial release (Closes: #753894)


I'm the maintainer of the package 'bwctl' which is already part of
the official debian archive. I'm hoping to get the newest version
of 'bwctl' into the archive. The newest version depends on 'i2util'
(the old version did not!).

My sponsor for 'bwctl' has been unresponsive for the last months,
hopefully someone else can step in to make the upload happen in
time before the freeze.

Thanks to anyone who is willing to help!

Best Regards,

   Raoul Gunnar Borenius

-- 
-
Raoul Gunnar Borenius  Phone  : +49 711 63314-206
DFN-Verein, Geschäftsstelle Stuttgart  Fax: +49 711 63314-133
Lindenspürstr.32   E-Mail : boren...@dfn.de
D-70176 Stuttgart  WWW: http://www.dfn.de
-
- Deutsches Forschungsnetz --
- Germany's National Research and Education Network -
-


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package i2util version 1.2-1 is in NEW now,
and the package at mentors is not newer (2014-10-06) than the package in NEW 
(2014-10-06),
so there is currently no package to sponsor.

http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/i2util_1.2-1.html
http://mentors.debian.net/package/i2util

Please remove the package from mentors or mark it needs sponsor = no.
If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW,
then you can upload an updated package to mentors
and feel free to reopen this RFS 763513 or open a new RFS.---End Message---


Bug#764271: marked as done (RFS: libgaiagraphics/0.5-3 [RC])

2014-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Oct 2014 04:24:41 +
with message-id e1xbmkh-0008mb...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: libgaiagraphics/0.5-3 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #764271,
regarding RFS: libgaiagraphics/0.5-3 [RC]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
764271: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764271
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgaiagraphics

 Package name: libgaiagraphics
 Version : 0.5-3
 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri a.furi...@lqt.it
 URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libgaiagraphics/index
 License : LGPL-3.0+
 Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

 libgaiagraphics-dev  - Gaia common graphics support - development headers
 libgaiagraphics1 - Gaia common graphics support
 libgaiagraphics1-dbg - Gaia common graphics support - debugging symbols

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgaiagraphics


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgaiagraphics/libgaiagraphics_0.5-3.dsc

More information about libgaiagraphics can be obtained from 
https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libgaiagraphics/index.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Change build dependency from libjpeg8-dev to libjpeg-dev for jpeg-turbo
transition. (closes: #763479).
  * Drop lintian override for no-upstream-changelog, shouldn't override
pedantic tags.
  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package libgaiagraphics version 0.5-3 is in unstable now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libgaiagraphics---End Message---