Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
On 12 December 2014 at 08:57, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
l...@alaxarxa.net wrote:
 Hi,


 do you know if exist some place where someone could dput a debian source
 package and it was built in a clean environtment for a debian distro, as
 launchpad service for ubuntu?

 And, if it doesn't exist, could some of you explain why we don't have this?
 Or, should I have to create a something similar to a jenkins infrastructure to
 test and build my own packages?


Did you test pbuilder?

-- 
Arturo Borrero González


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAOkSjBgYFbULFfqXd539nCU0=xqp0omyp8w5uoxy54sy8jn...@mail.gmail.com



Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez va escriure:
 On 12 December 2014 at 08:57, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
 l...@alaxarxa.net wrote:
  Hi,
 
 
  do you know if exist some place where someone could dput a debian source
  package and it was built in a clean environtment for a debian distro, as
  launchpad service for ubuntu?
 
  And, if it doesn't exist, could some of you explain why we don't have 
this?
  Or, should I have to create a something similar to a jenkins 
infrastructure to
  test and build my own packages?
 
 
 Did you test pbuilder?

yes,

I build my packages with pbuilder, but I'm looking for an automatic place to 
build packages for debian.


-- 
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:15:44AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit :
 
 I build my packages with pbuilder, but I'm looking for an automatic place to 
 build packages for debian.

Dear Leopold,

how about Elida ?

https://packages.debian.org/sid/elida

Cheers,

-- 
Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141212082034.gi3...@falafel.plessy.net



Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Charles Plessy va escriure:
 Le Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:15:44AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit 
:
  
  I build my packages with pbuilder, but I'm looking for an automatic place 
to 
  build packages for debian.
 
 Dear Leopold,
 
 how about Elida ?
 
 https://packages.debian.org/sid/elida
 

But I have to install it, and prepare a server to do that. There's no a public 
service for debian that do that, no?


Leopold

-- 
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:

 But I have to install it, and prepare a server to do that. There's no a public
 service for debian that do that, no?

The Debian autobuild service is here:

https://buildd.debian.org/

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/caktje6gnbuo6xxkt+conighduygd1397ikni04xqeiwnc2-...@mail.gmail.com



Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Paul Wise va escriure:
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
 
  But I have to install it, and prepare a server to do that. There's no a 
public
  service for debian that do that, no?
 
 The Debian autobuild service is here:
 
 https://buildd.debian.org/
 

Yes, but _only_ the debian developers could access there. If I want to test a 
package, you need an sponsor, and so on. I know the path.

The question is that sometimes one wants to build or test, or whatever and 
launchpad offers that service for ubuntu. And the people, like me, that would 
like to have own packages to test previous search an sponsor, have to create 
all this infrastructure. That's all.

I would love to have a public service to build with clean autobuilders 
packages for the people. Not, like now that you have to build your own 
environtment.

Best regards,

Leopold


-- 
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:37AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
 A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Paul Wise va escriure:
  On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
  The Debian autobuild service is here:
  https://buildd.debian.org/
 Yes, but _only_ the debian developers could access there. If I want to test a 
 package, you need an sponsor, and so on. I know the path.

ftp masters are also working to have PPA in debian (for DD and DM, if IIUC), but
this is a long dream.

 The question is that sometimes one wants to build or test, or whatever and
 launchpad offers that service for ubuntu. And the people, like me, that would 
 like to have own packages to test previous search an sponsor, have to create
 all this infrastructure. That's all.
 
 I would love to have a public service to build with clean autobuilders
 packages for the people. Not, like now that you have to build your own
 environtment.

To solve this issue (in fact, not everyone has a powerful enough computer to
locally build everything) some people write some tools.
I know about Deb-o-Matic: https://packages.debian.org/sid/debomatic

The developer run an instance here: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/ (also
with a really nice web interface see github for the source).
(if you are going to ask, the packages are currently keep for 15 days)

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB
more about me:  http://mapreri.org
Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
Ubuntu Wiki page:   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MattiaRizzolo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


maintainer scripts handling symlink to directory conversion

2014-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

I had a look into #771753 and noticed that the proper maintscripts that
should deal with the issue are included into the packaging.  However, I
can confirm that it only works for package libavifile-0.7c2 but not for
libavifile-0.7-bin and libavifile-0.7-dev.

I had tried whether the superflous '-- $@' at the end of these scripts
which is rather added by debhelper (see debdiff extract below) might
have some influence but it does not.

Does anybody have a clue why symlink_to_dir works perfectly for
libavifile-0.7c2 but not for libavifile-0.7-bin and libavifile-0.7-dev?

Kind regards

   Andreas.


diff -Nru avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-bin.maintscript 
avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-bin.maintscript
--- avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-bin.maintscript
2014-10-20 13:28:43.0 +0200
+++ avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-bin.maintscript
2014-12-12 11:16:47.0 +0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin/ 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ -- $@
+symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin/ 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
diff -Nru avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7c2.maintscript 
avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7c2.maintscript
--- avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7c2.maintscript  
2014-10-20 13:28:43.0 +0200
+++ avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7c2.maintscript  
2014-12-12 11:16:59.0 +0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7c2/ 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ -- $@
+symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7c2/ 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
diff -Nru avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-dev.maintscript 
avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-dev.maintscript
--- avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-dev.maintscript
2014-10-20 13:28:43.0 +0200
+++ avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-dev.maintscript
2014-12-12 11:16:54.0 +0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev/ 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ -- $@
+symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev/ 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~


-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141212105206.gd29...@an3as.eu



Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Mattia Rizzolo va escriure:

[...]

 The developer run an instance here: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/ (also
 with a really nice web interface see github for the source).
 (if you are going to ask, the packages are currently keep for 15 days)

Thanks it looks promising.

Leopold

-- 
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#772949: RFS: imageio/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Library for reading and writing a wide range of image formats

2014-12-12 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist


Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package imageio:

* Package name: imageio
  Version : 1.0
  Upstream Author : Almar Klein almar.kl...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/imageio/imageio
* License : BSD
  Section : Science

It builds the following binaries:

 python-imageio - Library for reading and writing a wide range of image
formats (Python 2)
 python3-imageio - Library for reading and writing a wide range of image
formats (Python 3)

I am intending to ask for a sponsor via the sponsorship of blends.

Changes since the last upload:

  Initial release (Closes: #769767)

Regards,
- Ghislain


Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Wookey
+++ Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda [2014-12-12 08:57 +0100]:
 Hi,
 
 
 do you know if exist some place where someone could dput a debian source 
 package and it was built in a clean environtment for a debian distro, as  
 launchpad service for ubuntu?

Debian is (slowly, as ever, help very welcome) working on PPA-equivalents.

In the meantime the only public service I'm aware of for this is OBS:
https://build.opensuse.org/
 
There are debian packages for the client end (obs-build) which you can
install, prepare your package, and specifiy what distros/suites you
want it built for, then OBS will do that for you. The architecture
support does not cover all of debian's arches.

 And, if it doesn't exist, could some of you explain why we don't have this? 

It's mostly designed, but is waiting for the tuits to implement it. 

 Or, should I have to create a something similar to a jenkins infrastructure 
 to 
 test and build my own packages?

It should be loads easier than it is for a random person to install a
little local autobulder. We have been very bad at making this easy.

It is relatively painless to install: rebuildd, debile or pybit and
get things rebuilt-on-checkin, but only for your local arches unless
you have a handy pile of foreign-arch machines lying around or can be
bothered to set up qemu-builders or cross-builders. (And all of those
packages have issues to some degree).

But that doesn't solve the 'having somewhere public for others to
download from' or the 'building other arches natively' issues.

I have looked at this issue a few times and would love to have more
time to spend to spend on it...

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141212122911.gh27...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk



Bug#772949: RFS: imageio/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Library for reading and writing a wide range of image formats

2014-12-12 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
I have added an entry for imageio in the SoB page [1].

This package is pretty straightforward, pure Python, no specific build
deps,
and lintian clean. I have notified upstream to include the sphinxdoc and
test
suite for the next release.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB#preview

Cheers,
- Ghis

2014-12-12 12:22 GMT+00:00 Ghislain Vaillant ghisv...@gmail.com:

 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist


 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package imageio:

 * Package name: imageio
   Version : 1.0
   Upstream Author : Almar Klein almar.kl...@gmail.com
 * URL : https://github.com/imageio/imageio
 * License : BSD
   Section : Science

 It builds the following binaries:

  python-imageio - Library for reading and writing a wide range of image
 formats (Python 2)
  python3-imageio - Library for reading and writing a wide range of image
 formats (Python 3)

 I am intending to ask for a sponsor via the sponsorship of blends.

 Changes since the last upload:

   Initial release (Closes: #769767)

 Regards,
 - Ghislain



Re: dh-autoreconf: aclocal: rename aclocal.m4 to acinclude.m4

2014-12-12 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Forum,

thanks a lot for the replies.

On 11/12/14 18:24, Jakub Wilk wrote:
 * Paul Wise p...@debian.org, 2014-12-11, 22:17:
 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
 aclocal rewrite the aclocal.m4 files, so precious information can be lost: 
 a workaround is to rename the `aclocal.m4' files `acinclude.m4'.

 When this renaming process can take place ? in d/rules ? at the repacking 
 stage ?

 Upstream would be best.
 
 Indeed!

I am agree.

 
 And until it's fixed upstream, I'd suggest to rename it in debian/rules.
 Don't forget to rename it back in the clean target. :-)
 

Right now, I am considering to package from the upstream git repository itself
as it contains the necessary m4 material (and in fact, all the necessary 
material).
Furthermore, sadly, the upstream maintainer team seem also overwhelmed.

Thanks,
Jerome


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548aead5.1030...@rezozer.net



Re: maintainer scripts handling symlink to directory conversion

2014-12-12 Thread Ondřej Surý
I found two things you need to do to avoid breakages:

1. Strip trailing slash for any argument (especially the first argument,
e.g. the path)
2. Strip full path for old_path, as readlink -f is a beast in case you
have symlink-symlink-dir or something like that

E.g. do:

symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin libavifile-0.7-common
1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~

symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7c2 libavifile-0.7-common
1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~

symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev libavifile-0.7-common
1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~

In case this doesn't help, you might need to set DPKG_DEBUG=1 before
running upgrade, or even mangle dpkg-maintscript-helper to have
#!/bin/sh -x stanza.

Cheers,
Ondrej

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014, at 11:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I had a look into #771753 and noticed that the proper maintscripts that
 should deal with the issue are included into the packaging.  However, I
 can confirm that it only works for package libavifile-0.7c2 but not for
 libavifile-0.7-bin and libavifile-0.7-dev.
 
 I had tried whether the superflous '-- $@' at the end of these scripts
 which is rather added by debhelper (see debdiff extract below) might
 have some influence but it does not.
 
 Does anybody have a clue why symlink_to_dir works perfectly for
 libavifile-0.7c2 but not for libavifile-0.7-bin and libavifile-0.7-dev?
 
 Kind regards
 
Andreas.
 
 
 diff -Nru
 avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-bin.maintscript
 avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-bin.maintscript
 --- avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-bin.maintscript   
 2014-10-20 13:28:43.0 +0200
 +++ avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-bin.maintscript   
 2014-12-12 11:16:47.0 +0100
 @@ -1 +1 @@
 -symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin/
 /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ -- $@
 +symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin/
 /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
 diff -Nru avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7c2.maintscript
 avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7c2.maintscript
 --- avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7c2.maintscript 
 2014-10-20 13:28:43.0 +0200
 +++ avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7c2.maintscript 
 2014-12-12 11:16:59.0 +0100
 @@ -1 +1 @@
 -symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7c2/
 /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ -- $@
 +symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7c2/
 /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
 diff -Nru
 avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-dev.maintscript
 avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-dev.maintscript
 --- avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-dev.maintscript   
 2014-10-20 13:28:43.0 +0200
 +++ avifile-0.7.48~20090503.ds/debian/libavifile-0.7-dev.maintscript   
 2014-12-12 11:16:54.0 +0100
 @@ -1 +1 @@
 -symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev/
 /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ -- $@
 +symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev/
 /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
 
 
 -- 
 http://fam-tille.de


-- 
Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1418389919.2833109.202092193.18010...@webmail.messagingengine.com



RE:launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
 Debian is (slowly, as ever, help very welcome) working on PPA-equivalents.

 It's mostly designed, but is waiting for the tuits to implement it.

doc pointer, DEP ?

do we imagine something more decentrallize where we can imaging thaht an

institutA has an instance of this PPA want to work with intitutB whcih already 
has another instance.
it should be easy to merge InstanceA + instance B.

maybe the new system should use a P2P protocol to share the ressources between 
instittus.
Let's imagine that you download a virtual machine start it and it become a new 
buildd instance. which only need to be connected to a master controller.

Is this kind of things discusses in the design ?

Cheers

Frederic

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1fda...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr



Please sponsor dbab, the dnsmasq-based ad-blocker

2014-12-12 Thread Tong Sun
Dear mentors,

I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab, the innovative
dnsmasq-based ad-blocker that will benefit most people. I'll keep
reposting this request regularly in hoping someone will pay attention
to it. Here is my sales-pitch again:

Ever want to remove Ads and speed up your (iphone/ipad) mobile device
browsing without installing any apps to them?

Sounds too good to be true? Yes, but unless you install the `dbab`
server. It will make the magic happen. Please sponsor my wonderful
dnsmasq-based ad-blocking package, so that more people can benefit
from it. More details at

http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/use-new-dbab-to-set-proxy-
automatically/#advantages;

Once again, I am looking for a sponsor for my newly upgraded package
dbab

 * Package name: dbab
   Version : 1.1.1-1
   Upstream Author :  Tong Sun suntong...@users.sourceforge.net
 * URL : https://github.com/suntong001/dbab
 * License : BSD
   Section : net

  It builds those binary packages:

dbab  - dnsmasq-based ad-blocking using pixelserv

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/dbab

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dbab/
dbab_1.1.1-1.dsc

  More information about dbab can be obtained from
http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/use-new-dbab-to-set-proxy-
automatically/#advantages;.

Thanks for your help.

Best Regards,

Tong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cammz1oej2tuajwmmtpxk00abpzf7+qt+epooi_kutw767d_...@mail.gmail.com



Re: maintainer scripts handling symlink to directory conversion

2014-12-12 Thread Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère
Andreas Tille:

 I had a look into #771753 and noticed that the proper maintscripts that
 should deal with the issue are included into the packaging.  However, I
 can confirm that it only works for package libavifile-0.7c2 but not for
 libavifile-0.7-bin and libavifile-0.7-dev.
 (...)
 Does anybody have a clue why symlink_to_dir works perfectly for
 libavifile-0.7c2 but not for libavifile-0.7-bin and libavifile-0.7-dev?

-bin and -dev are missing the Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
libavifile-0.7c2 has it.

Moreover, there have been a few bugs in old versions of symlink_to_dir.
Current UNRELEASED implementation of debhelper set minimum version of
dpkg at 1.17.14

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debhelper/debhelper.git/commit/dh_installdeb?id=20c42b08a649f18522bc25ddec8e099ee7133e1e

Some packages have been hardcoding both the pre-depends and the
build-depends, as a result:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-apache/apache2.git/commit/?id=edb81a0755c37594c1bb16fb691296442a6a2ae0

It might help

-- 
Nirgal



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: maintainer scripts handling symlink to directory conversion

2014-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:11:59PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
 I found two things you need to do to avoid breakages:
 
 1. Strip trailing slash for any argument (especially the first argument,
 e.g. the path)
 2. Strip full path for old_path, as readlink -f is a beast in case you
 have symlink-symlink-dir or something like that
 
 E.g. do:
 
 symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin libavifile-0.7-common
 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
 
 symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7c2 libavifile-0.7-common
 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
 
 symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev libavifile-0.7-common
 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
 
 In case this doesn't help, you might need to set DPKG_DEBUG=1 before
 running upgrade, or even mangle dpkg-maintscript-helper to have
 #!/bin/sh -x stanza.

I tried to follow this and have removed the full path only for
libavifile-0.7-bin to have some comparison what works and what not.
In other words I have:

$ cat debian/*.maint*
symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin libavifile-0.7-common 
1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7c2 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~

Here is what DPKG_DEBUG=1 shows on installation of libavifile-0.7-bin
and libavifile-0.7-dev:

$ LANG= sudo DPKG_DEBUG=1 dpkg -i 
libavifile-0.7-bin_0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2_amd64.deb 
(Reading database ... 427590 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack libavifile-0.7-bin_0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2_amd64.deb ...
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper 
symlink_to_dir in prerm of libavifile-0.7-bin
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin - 
libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-bin:amd64 
LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade 
PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir 
not required in prerm
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper 
symlink_to_dir in preinst of libavifile-0.7-bin
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin - 
libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-bin:amd64 
LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade 
PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
Unpacking libavifile-0.7-bin (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) over 
(1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper 
symlink_to_dir in postrm of libavifile-0.7-bin
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin - 
libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-bin:amd64 
LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade 
PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
Setting up libavifile-0.7-bin (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper 
symlink_to_dir in postinst of libavifile-0.7-bin
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin - 
libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-bin:amd64 
LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=configure 
PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-3) ...
$ LANG= sudo DPKG_DEBUG=1 dpkg -i 
libavifile-0.7-dev_0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2_amd64.deb 
(Reading database ... 427590 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack libavifile-0.7-dev_0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2_amd64.deb ...
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper 
symlink_to_dir in prerm of libavifile-0.7-dev
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev - 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-dev:amd64 
LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade 
PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir 
not required in prerm
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper 
symlink_to_dir in preinst of libavifile-0.7-dev
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev - 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-dev:amd64 
LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade 
PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
Unpacking libavifile-0.7-dev (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) over 
(1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper 
symlink_to_dir in postrm of libavifile-0.7-dev
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev - 
/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-dev:amd64 
LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade 
PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
Setting up libavifile-0.7-dev (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...
DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper 
symlink_to_dir in 

Re: maintainer scripts handling symlink to directory conversion

2014-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jean-Michel,

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:58:17PM +, Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère wrote:
 Andreas Tille:
 
  Does anybody have a clue why symlink_to_dir works perfectly for
  libavifile-0.7c2 but not for libavifile-0.7-bin and libavifile-0.7-dev?
 
 -bin and -dev are missing the Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
 libavifile-0.7c2 has it.

I have added these here locally (failed to report here) but it has no
effect at all.  I think this is not the reason for the problem since the
correct dpkg version is available here.
 
 Moreover, there have been a few bugs in old versions of symlink_to_dir.
 Current UNRELEASED implementation of debhelper set minimum version of
 dpkg at 1.17.14

The currently installed dpkg version is 1.17.21 (amd64).
 
Kind regards

 Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141212153257.ge10...@an3as.eu



Re: maintainer scripts handling symlink to directory conversion

2014-12-12 Thread Ondřej Surý
This will never work:

 Unpacking libavifile-0.7-bin (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) over 
 (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...

as the old version is greater than version specified in *.maintscript.

Please re-do the test in clean (wheezy, jessie) environment

O.

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014, at 16:28, Andreas Tille wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:11:59PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
  I found two things you need to do to avoid breakages:
  
  1. Strip trailing slash for any argument (especially the first argument,
  e.g. the path)
  2. Strip full path for old_path, as readlink -f is a beast in case you
  have symlink-symlink-dir or something like that
  
  E.g. do:
  
  symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin libavifile-0.7-common
  1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
  
  symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7c2 libavifile-0.7-common
  1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
  
  symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev libavifile-0.7-common
  1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
  
  In case this doesn't help, you might need to set DPKG_DEBUG=1 before
  running upgrade, or even mangle dpkg-maintscript-helper to have
  #!/bin/sh -x stanza.
 
 I tried to follow this and have removed the full path only for
 libavifile-0.7-bin to have some comparison what works and what not.
 In other words I have:
 
 $ cat debian/*.maint*
 symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin libavifile-0.7-common
 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
 symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7c2
 /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
 symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev
 /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~
 
 Here is what DPKG_DEBUG=1 shows on installation of libavifile-0.7-bin
 and libavifile-0.7-dev:
 
 $ LANG= sudo DPKG_DEBUG=1 dpkg -i
 libavifile-0.7-bin_0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2_amd64.deb 
 (Reading database ... 427590 files and directories currently installed.)
 Preparing to unpack libavifile-0.7-bin_0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2_amd64.deb
 ...
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing
 /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir in prerm of
 libavifile-0.7-bin
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin
 - libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-bin:amd64
 LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade
 PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper
 symlink_to_dir not required in prerm
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing
 /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir in preinst of
 libavifile-0.7-bin
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin
 - libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-bin:amd64
 LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade
 PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
 Unpacking libavifile-0.7-bin (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) over
 (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing
 /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir in postrm of
 libavifile-0.7-bin
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin
 - libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-bin:amd64
 LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade
 PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
 Setting up libavifile-0.7-bin (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing
 /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir in postinst of
 libavifile-0.7-bin
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-bin
 - libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-bin:amd64
 LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=configure
 PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
 Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-3) ...
 $ LANG= sudo DPKG_DEBUG=1 dpkg -i
 libavifile-0.7-dev_0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2_amd64.deb 
 (Reading database ... 427590 files and directories currently installed.)
 Preparing to unpack libavifile-0.7-dev_0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2_amd64.deb
 ...
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing
 /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir in prerm of
 libavifile-0.7-dev
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev
 - /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-dev:amd64
 LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade
 PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper
 symlink_to_dir not required in prerm
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing
 /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir in preinst of
 libavifile-0.7-dev
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: SYMLINK=/usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-dev
 - /usr/share/doc/libavifile-0.7-common PACKAGE=libavifile-0.7-dev:amd64
 LASTVERSION=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.1~ ACTION=upgrade
 PARAM=1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2
 Unpacking libavifile-0.7-dev (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) over
 (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...
 DEBUG: dpkg-maintscript-helper: Executing
 /usr/bin/dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir in postrm of
 libavifile-0.7-dev
 DEBUG: 

Re: maintainer scripts handling symlink to directory conversion

2014-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:33:11PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
 This will never work:
 
  Unpacking libavifile-0.7-bin (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) over 
  (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...
 
 as the old version is greater than version specified in *.maintscript.
 
 Please re-do the test in clean (wheezy, jessie) environment

Uhmmm, you are correct.  Now it works.  I'll upload later.

Thanks for opening my eyes

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141212155219.gf10...@an3as.eu



Bug#772970: RFS: pktools/2.6.1-1~exp1

2014-12-12 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package pktools

 Package name: pktools
 Version : 2.6.1-1~exp1
 Upstream Author : Pieter Kempeneers kempe...@gmail.com
 URL : http://pktools.nongnu.org/
 License : GPL-3+
 Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

 pktools  - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing
 pktools-dev  - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing - 
development files
 libalgorithms1   - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing - 
libalgorithms
 libfileclasses1  - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing - 
libfileClasses
 libimageclasses1 - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing - 
libimageClasses
 liblasclasses1   - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing - 
liblasClasses

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/pktools


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pktools/pktools_2.6.1-1~exp1.dsc

More information about pktools can be obtained from http://pktools.nongnu.org/.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * Refresh patches.
  * Remove libbase package, library no longer installed.
  * Add man page for pkann, pkascii2img, pkascii2ogr, pkcomposite, pkcreatect,
pkcrop, pkdiff, pkdsm2shadow, pkdumpimg, pkdumpogr, pkegcs, pkextract,
pkfillnodata, pkfilter, pkfilterascii, pkfilterdem, pkfsann, pkfssvm,
pkgetmask, pkinfo, pklas2img, pkoptsvm, pkpolygonize, pkregann, pksetmask,
pksieve, pkstatascii, pkstatogr  pksvm.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20141212160628.31782.30752.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl



Bug#770449: ITP, RFS for Caml Crush package

2014-12-12 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 02/12/2014 13:34, Thomas Calderon a écrit :
 1. I have split the debian-related files from the master branch. I will
 now use upstream and debian branches instead. Therefore, release
 tarballs will not contain this directory.

$ tar tf ../caml-crush_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz|grep debian
caml-crush-1.0.4/debian/
caml-crush-1.0.4/debian/caml-crush-clients.install
caml-crush-1.0.4/debian/caml-crush-clients.lintian-overrides
caml-crush-1.0.4/debian/caml-crush-server.init
[...]

Is that intentional?

 2. You were right, there was no valid reason to have the SOs directly in
 /usr/lib, I moved them to /usr/lib/triplet/caml-crush. This has indeed
 the positive effect of suppressing the lintian issues.
 3. I switched to the Debian-pkcs11proxyd system account and group.
 4. Since we rely on OCaml native compilers, I switched from the
 ocaml-nox build dependency to ocaml-native-compilers and have
 Architecture: any instead.
 5. Since Caml Crush does not (yet) support using bytecode-only
 architecture, we rely on ocaml-native-compilers to restrict the
 supported architectures.

Fine.

 I have uploaded a new version on mentors.debian.net

Also, could you make a single changelog entry for the initial release?


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548b1d9a.9000...@debian.org



Bug#772895: marked as done (RFS: osm2pgsql/0.87.0-1~exp2)

2014-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:29:30 +
with message-id e1xzt5u-0005qc...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: osm2pgsql/0.87.0-1~exp2
has caused the Debian Bug report #772895,
regarding RFS: osm2pgsql/0.87.0-1~exp2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
772895: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772895
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package osm2pgsql

 Package name: osm2pgsql
 Version : 0.87.0-1~exp2
 Upstream Author : Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com
 URL : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql
 License : GPL-2+
 Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

 osm2pgsql - OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/osm2pgsql


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osm2pgsql/osm2pgsql_0.87.0-1~exp2.dsc

More information about osm2pgsql can be obtained from 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Add patch to not use Boost lockfree queues even for Boost = 1.53,
hopefully fixes the FTBFS on arm64, armel, powerpc, ppc64el  s390x.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package osm2pgsql version 0.87.0-1~exp2 is in experimental now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/osm2pgsql---End Message---


Bug#766069: marked as done (RFS: django-session-security/2.2.3-1 [ITP] Log a user out after X minutes)

2014-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:29:31 +
with message-id e1xzt5v-0005qz...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: django-session-security/2.2.3-1 [ITP]  Log a user 
out after X minutes
has caused the Debian Bug report #766069,
regarding RFS: django-session-security/2.2.3-1 [ITP]  Log a user out after X 
minutes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
766069: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766069
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Apologies for hitting the list so late before the freeze, but
django-session-security needs your help as a sponsor:


Description: Django module to log a user out after X minutes

A little javascript and middleware work together to ensure that the
user was active during the past X minutes in any tab he has open.
Otherwise, display a warning leaving a couple of minutes to show any
kind of activity like moving the mouse. Otherwise, logout the user.


To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/django-session-security
  http://django-session-security.rtfd.org/


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/django-session-security/django-session-security_2.2.1-1.dsc


Thank you!
-- 
Nirgal Vourgère
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=jmv_...@nirgal.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package django-session-security has been removed from mentors.---End Message---


Fwd: Please sponsor dbab, the dnsmasq-based ad-blocker

2014-12-12 Thread Tong Sun
Dear mentors,

I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab, the innovative
dnsmasq-based ad-blocker that will benefit most people. I'll keep
reposting this request regularly in hoping someone will pay attention
to it. Here is my sales-pitch again:

Ever want to remove Ads and speed up your (iphone/ipad) mobile device
browsing without installing any apps to them?

Sounds too good to be true? Yes, but unless you install the `dbab`
server. It will make the magic happen. Please sponsor my wonderful
dnsmasq-based ad-blocking package, so that more people can benefit
from it. More details at

http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/use-new-dbab-to-set-proxy-
automatically/#advantages;

Once again, I am looking for a sponsor for my newly upgraded package
dbab

 * Package name: dbab
   Version : 1.1.1-1
   Upstream Author :  Tong Sun suntong...@users.sourceforge.net
 * URL : https://github.com/suntong001/dbab
 * License : BSD
   Section : net

  It builds those binary packages:

dbab  - dnsmasq-based ad-blocking using pixelserv

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/dbab

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dbab/
dbab_1.1.1-1.dsc

  More information about dbab can be obtained from
http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/use-new-dbab-to-set-proxy-
automatically/#advantages;.

Thanks for your help.

Best Regards,

Tong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cammz1oddt3giqohbciocs-4jetfhh-vdftac0w2jwc-kpbf...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#769375: RFS: lightmdeditor/1.0-2 [ITP]

2014-12-12 Thread Bhavyanshu Parasher


Adding a follow-up to the RFS informing about the update in package. The 
new URL for .dsc file has changed since the version has been incremented 
after adding new patches. Please use this one.


dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lightmdeditor/lightmdeditor_1.0-3.dsc


To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/lightmdeditor

Also you can check github repository : 
https://github.com/bhavyanshu/lightmd_editor


Changes since last upload:

lightmdeditor (1.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Minor performance tweaks
  * Fixed file dialog issues
  * Fixed tab size bug and handling of tab index when tabs are closed

 -- Bhavyanshu Parasher a...@bhavyanshu.me  Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:20:43 
+0530


Regards,
Bhavyanshu Parasher


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548b38fe.10...@bhavyanshu.me



Re: Please sponsor dbab, the dnsmasq-based ad-blocker

2014-12-12 Thread Riley Baird
 I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab, the innovative
 dnsmasq-based ad-blocker that will benefit most people. I'll keep
 reposting this request regularly in hoping someone will pay attention
 to it. Here is my sales-pitch again:

I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but here are some things
that I've noticed:

* You don't have a d/watch file, despite the fact that you use Github's
'release' feature. https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch

* d/changelog should only document Debian-related changes. Since your
package has not yet been included in Debian, you only need one entry for
the release that you are actually packaging.

* In d/control, you say that debhelper version 9 or greater is required,
but d/compat contains 8. I've successfully compiled after changing
d/compat to 9, so unless you had a special reason to use 8, I think
that you should change it.

* d/docs is empty. You should include dbab.html.

Good luck getting your package into Debian!

Riley


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548b4c9a.3070...@bitmessage.ch



Bug#769375: RFS: lightmdeditor/1.0-2 [ITP]

2014-12-12 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: Tags -1 wontfix moreinfo

Hi Bhavyanshu,

A short review:
(sorry, I do not intend to sponsor this package)

- As you seem to be als the upstream author, please read
https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide; Especially having a debian
directory in the upstream repository is not a good idea. 
- You package must not be native.
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_is_the_difference_between_a_native_Debian_package_and_a_non-native_package.3F
- You should include the manpage in the upstream tarball, not in
debian/
- What is the source of all those images in src/images?

For examples, google-image search on theme-light/cut.png seems reveals
that those seems
to be out of the Wireframe mono icons from Gentleface.com -- licensed
CC-BY-NC-3.0 (which is not acceptable for Debian main)
The other theme seems also same license and from the White Wireframe
Toolbar Icons

Meta info of some icons says also CC-BY-NC-ND.

PLEASE make sure to appropiatly record copyright of resources you use.
(Not doing so is copyright infringement and put both you and Debian at
legal risks)

This is a show-stopper -- marking this bug wontfix as this makes it
unsuitable for main. Please read about DFSG and related policies. 

Stopping the review here.

--
tobi


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Fwd: Please sponsor dbab, the dnsmasq-based ad-blocker

2014-12-12 Thread Tong Sun
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de wrote:

 posting it every 3 hours will only help you to NOT find a sponsor for your
 package.

I understand your concern, but that's not my intention.

If you take a look at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2014/12/threads.html
You will find that none of my two posts today showed up there.

I *thought* none of them went through until I get your message. Thanks
for that though.

Again, that's not my intention, and people do make mistakes.
Sorry if it bothers you.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAMmz1OcNRhfU4PiNLM2-b1pP2AkeM8mMwb=gh1ctzhrrt+o...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#769375: RFS: lightmdeditor/1.0-2 [ITP]

2014-12-12 Thread Riley Baird
On 13/12/14 05:50, Bhavyanshu Parasher wrote:
 
 Adding a follow-up to the RFS informing about the update in package. The
 new URL for .dsc file has changed since the version has been incremented
 after adding new patches. Please use this one.
 
 dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lightmdeditor/lightmdeditor_1.0-3.dsc
 
 
 To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following URL:
 http://mentors.debian.net/package/lightmdeditor
 
 Also you can check github repository :
 https://github.com/bhavyanshu/lightmd_editor
 
 Changes since last upload:
 
 lightmdeditor (1.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Minor performance tweaks
   * Fixed file dialog issues
   * Fixed tab size bug and handling of tab index when tabs are closed
 
  -- Bhavyanshu Parasher a...@bhavyanshu.me  Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:20:43
 +0530
 
 Regards,
 Bhavyanshu Parasher

I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but here are some things
I've noticed:

* You've accidentally made a native package, but this software has an
upstream and is not solely developed for Debian. Replace the contents of
d/source/format with 3.0 (quilt) and create a .orig.tar.xz file.

* d/changelog records only Debian-specific changes, not upstream changes.

* The way you've done versioning upstream is likely to be incompatible
with Debian's way of versioning. In Debian, everything after the dash
(-) is seen as a Debian-specific revision. It would make more sense to
call your upstream version 1.0.3, and make the Debian version 1.0.3-1


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548b5296.3070...@bitmessage.ch



Bug#769375: RFS: lightmdeditor/1.0-2 [ITP]

2014-12-12 Thread Bhavyanshu Parasher
Thank you! Riley and Tobias for helping me understand the problems with 
the package. While I can fix the other mentioned issues but I can't get 
rid of the icons as of now just because they are licensed under 
CC-BY-NC-3.0 which makes them unacceptable for debian main (as mentioned 
by Tobias). It will take me a while to design own icons.


Thank you for reviewing.

Regards,
Bhavyanshu Parasher


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548b5ed8.3010...@bhavyanshu.me



Bug#772999: RFS: jmapviewer/1.04+dfsg-1~exp1

2014-12-12 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package jmapviewer

 Package name: jmapviewer
 Version : 1.04+dfsg-1~exp1
 Upstream Author : Jan Peter Stotz and others
 URL : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JMapViewer
 License : GPL-2+
 Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

 jmapviewer - Java OpenStreetMap Tile Viewer

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/jmapviewer


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jmapviewer/jmapviewer_1.04+dfsg-1~exp1.dsc

More information about JMapViewer can be obtained from 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JMapViewer.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * Add myself to Uploaders.
  * Add gbp.conf to use pristine-tar by default.
  * Drop 04-bing-logo.patch, applied upstream.
  * Restructure control file with cme.
  * Update Vcs-Browser URL for cgit.
  * Add upstream metadata.
  * Drop no-upstream-changelog lintian override,
shouldn't override pedantic tags.
  * Add lintian override for incompatible-java-bytecode-format,
JDK 7 is required.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20141212213722.15057.8365.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl



Re: Please sponsor dbab, the dnsmasq-based ad-blocker

2014-12-12 Thread Wookey
+++ Tong Sun [2014-12-12 09:52 -0500]:
 Dear mentors,
 
 I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab, the innovative
 dnsmasq-based ad-blocker that will benefit most people. I'll keep
 reposting this request regularly in hoping someone will pay attention
 to it. 

OK. This sounded interesting the first time. And you seem to be keen, so I had 
a look:

I could be persuaded to sponsor.

 dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dbab/ 
 dbab_1.1.1-1.dsc

Some comments:

* remove the dh_make boilerplate from debian/rules, postinst, postrm. 

* There should be a systemd service file as well as an init script

* Any reason why dh compat level is 8 not 9?

* The package has a .pc dir but there is no patch series

Other than that it looks simple enough

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141212214906.gm27...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk



Re: Please sponsor dbab, the dnsmasq-based ad-blocker

2014-12-12 Thread Wookey
+++ Wookey [2014-12-12 21:49 +]:
 +++ Tong Sun [2014-12-12 09:52 -0500]:
  Dear mentors,
  
  I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab,

 Other than that it looks simple enough

Oh, and a man page would be nice.

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141212215129.gn27...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk



Bug#772970: marked as done (RFS: pktools/2.6.1-1~exp1)

2014-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Dec 2014 04:28:03 +
with message-id e1xzejh-0004vh...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: pktools/2.6.1-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #772970,
regarding RFS: pktools/2.6.1-1~exp1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
772970: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772970
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package pktools

 Package name: pktools
 Version : 2.6.1-1~exp1
 Upstream Author : Pieter Kempeneers kempe...@gmail.com
 URL : http://pktools.nongnu.org/
 License : GPL-3+
 Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

 pktools  - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing
 pktools-dev  - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing - 
development files
 libalgorithms1   - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing - 
libalgorithms
 libfileclasses1  - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing - 
libfileClasses
 libimageclasses1 - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing - 
libimageClasses
 liblasclasses1   - GDAL add-on tools to perform useful raster processing - 
liblasClasses

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/pktools


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pktools/pktools_2.6.1-1~exp1.dsc

More information about pktools can be obtained from http://pktools.nongnu.org/.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * Refresh patches.
  * Remove libbase package, library no longer installed.
  * Add man page for pkann, pkascii2img, pkascii2ogr, pkcomposite, pkcreatect,
pkcrop, pkdiff, pkdsm2shadow, pkdumpimg, pkdumpogr, pkegcs, pkextract,
pkfillnodata, pkfilter, pkfilterascii, pkfilterdem, pkfsann, pkfssvm,
pkgetmask, pkinfo, pklas2img, pkoptsvm, pkpolygonize, pkregann, pksetmask,
pksieve, pkstatascii, pkstatogr  pksvm.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package pktools has been removed from mentors.---End Message---


Bug#772999: marked as done (RFS: jmapviewer/1.04+dfsg-1~exp1)

2014-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Dec 2014 04:28:00 +
with message-id e1xzeje-0004vt...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: jmapviewer/1.04+dfsg-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #772999,
regarding RFS: jmapviewer/1.04+dfsg-1~exp1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
772999: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772999
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package jmapviewer

 Package name: jmapviewer
 Version : 1.04+dfsg-1~exp1
 Upstream Author : Jan Peter Stotz and others
 URL : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JMapViewer
 License : GPL-2+
 Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

 jmapviewer - Java OpenStreetMap Tile Viewer

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/jmapviewer


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jmapviewer/jmapviewer_1.04+dfsg-1~exp1.dsc

More information about JMapViewer can be obtained from 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JMapViewer.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * Add myself to Uploaders.
  * Add gbp.conf to use pristine-tar by default.
  * Drop 04-bing-logo.patch, applied upstream.
  * Restructure control file with cme.
  * Update Vcs-Browser URL for cgit.
  * Add upstream metadata.
  * Drop no-upstream-changelog lintian override,
shouldn't override pedantic tags.
  * Add lintian override for incompatible-java-bytecode-format,
JDK 7 is required.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package jmapviewer version 1.04+dfsg-1~exp1 is in experimental now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/jmapviewer---End Message---