Bug#777586: RFS: crosswalk/11.40.277.2-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package crosswalk * Package name: crosswalk Version : 11.40.277.2-1 Upstream Author : Crosswalk Dev crosswalk-...@lists.crosswalk-project.org * URL : https://crosswalk-project.org/ * License : BSD Section : web It builds those binary packages: crosswalk - HTML5 web runtime To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/crosswalk Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crosswalk/crosswalk_11.40.277.2-1.dsc More information about Crosswalk can be obtained from https://crosswalk-project.org/. Regards, Xinchao He -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87mw4m9lue@takethat-he.sh.intel.com
Bug#775445: License updates, music included, ready for review (I hope)
Hi, After speaking with the author of the menu music, he has licensed it under CC-BY-3.0. The latest package reflects this: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bitfighter/bitfighter_019d+dfsg-14.dsc I also replaced the 'Play' font usage with 'LiberationSans' so it isn't so ugly (because of bug #776273) I believe I am read for review again. Thank you!, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54da4ab2.9050...@gmail.com
Re: Bug#777347: RFS: pidgin-gnome-keyring/2.0-1 [ITP] [RFP #714018] -- integrates pidgin (and libpurple) with the system keyring
On 10 February 2015 at 20:10, Tobias Frost t...@debian.org wrote: Am Montag, den 09.02.2015, 22:32 + schrieb Luca Boccassi: On 9 February 2015 at 10:55, Michael Fladischer mich...@fladi.at wrote: Hi Luca, Final question, the changelog lists the package as UNRELEASED, I think it's right since it's never been in any Debian distro, but on mentors it's raised as a red flag, any idea if I should change it? This field describes which distribution the uploaded package goes to and it is not fiddled with automatically e.g after an upload. Check out Policy §4.4. Summary: Write unstable here. Hello Tobias, Done, upload on mentors now lists unstable as a distribution in the changelog. Thank you very much! :-) Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAMw=ZnSgALJKSL2kJ9Gp9KA+KTkOMsP=jsorzrnpwtnngks...@mail.gmail.com
Is #694703 RFP: unvanquished unsful?
Dear mentors, I'm looking for a package that need help. I found unvanquished, which in my opinion is a good game: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694703 But there is already a debian package, which is not part of debian repository: http://debs.unvanquished.net/unstable/ Is it useful to repackage it from sources? Otherwise what should be done? Thank in advance for any help, Regards, Sébastien Bertrand. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cahl5h4e1sfgtjawjqma+wsmmfrurcvgvfxyarshm8+ybdy_...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#777347: RFS: pidgin-gnome-keyring/2.0-1 [ITP] [RFP #714018] -- integrates pidgin (and libpurple) with the system keyring
Am Montag, den 09.02.2015, 22:32 + schrieb Luca Boccassi: On 9 February 2015 at 10:55, Michael Fladischer mich...@fladi.at wrote: Hi Luca, Final question, the changelog lists the package as UNRELEASED, I think it's right since it's never been in any Debian distro, but on mentors it's raised as a red flag, any idea if I should change it? This field describes which distribution the uploaded package goes to and it is not fiddled with automatically e.g after an upload. Check out Policy §4.4. Summary: Write unstable here. Thank you very much for the tips, I really appreciate them! Kind regards, Luca Boccassi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1423599038.934.72.ca...@debian.org
Re: Is #694703 RFP: unvanquished unsful?
I found unvanquished, which in my opinion is a good game: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694703 But there is already a debian package, which is not part of debian repository: http://debs.unvanquished.net/unstable/ Is it useful to repackage it from sources? Otherwise what should be done? If you want the package to be in main, it has to be compilable from source. However, you may be able to use their package as a starting point. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54da61aa.7070...@bitmessage.ch
Bug#777651: RFS: syncterm/20141022+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package syncterm Package name: syncterm Version : 20141022+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Deuce sy...@nix.synchro.net URL : http://syncterm.bbsdev.net/ License : LGPL Section : comm It builds those binary packages: syncterm - BBS terminal program from Synchronet syncterm-dbg - BBS terminal program from Synchronet (debug symbols) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/syncterm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/syncterm/syncterm_20141022+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: Initial release (Closes: #739035) Hi all!, im search again for sponsor, last guy sems to be very busy, he help me very much to make this package, but at this time lost connection with that person. Saludos! -- Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54dae5cb.9070...@docksud.com.ar
Re: Is #694703 RFP: unvanquished unsful?
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2015, 06:53 +1100 schrieb Riley Baird: I found unvanquished, which in my opinion is a good game: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694703 But there is already a debian package, which is not part of debian repository: http://debs.unvanquished.net/unstable/ Is it useful to repackage it from sources? Otherwise what should be done? Sure, you can use the package from upstream as a starting point. But expect that you need to check and re-ask everything, as this package is not perfect. (I only made a spot-check and not everything I was was perfect; however this was only a very short spot check.) From my experience it is often better to start from scratch. Of course, the upstream packaging can give some inspiration how upstream thinks it should be organized by distributions. If you are interested in packaging the game for Debian, please consider to join the Debian Games Team [1] and team-maintain the package. If you want the package to be in main, it has to be compilable from source. However, you may be able to use their package as a starting point. For main you actually have another requirement [2] : Free data. Unfortunatly upstream allows also non-free licenses [3], so this is a strong indication that at least some of their assets are non-free. (randomly taking a look at the map forlon shows this one is on a CC-BY-ND-NC license, checking another one there is no info at all So there will be some work to get license straightened with uptream and to find out if there is free content for the game. I hope I did not scare you off, but packaging is something that does not have instant results :) It would be definitly a nice game to be packaged -- even only in contrib. I could be persuaded to sponsor this, afterall. -- tobi [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Games/Team [2] https://wiki.debian.org/Games/Policy#guidelines_for_packaging_game_engines [3] https://wiki.unvanquished.net/index.php?title=Contributing/Artists signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#775445: Bug #775445 - RFS: bitfighter ready for next review
Bitfighter is ready for another review. See the package here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bitfighter/bitfighter_019d+dfsg-14.dsc Please forgive the double post. I had used poor subjects for previous e-mails. Thanks! David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54da9d63.5020...@gmail.com
