Re: Choosing the license - CC0 BSD or Dual [ seeking advise ]

[lorenzo]

On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:38:21 +0200
Joerg Jaspert  wrote:

> Assuming fast == wide spread, then you want something with the
> smallest amount of requirement/restrictions for those taking it.
> 
> If you truly do not care who takes it and whyt they do with it, nor
> want to be mentioned anywhere, something like CC0 is your way.
> 
> If you, at least theoretically, want to have your name appear
> somewhere, but don't care much anything else, "MIT" (expat) or BSD 3
> clause would be the thing.
> 
> If you do want to ensure it stays free software, other licenses apply.
>
>
> Now, point 2: None of those 3 licenses do make it any trouble
> whatsoever to use your code. (CC0 *IMO* the worst one, just from its
> size :) ).

I was thinking about the case of a project that prefer to merge
contribution under its license, that may be different from BSD..anyway
it's probably a minor problem.

Thanks for your help

Lorenzo

Bug#989365: Acknowledgement (RFS: recastnavigation)

[bret curtis]

Control: tags 989365 - moreinfo

I've uploaded the latest changes, as requested.
Which can be found here:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/recastnavigation/

The renaming of debian/librecast1.install to
debian/librecastnavigation1.install has lead to addition lintian warnings
that didn't previously exist however.

Please advise. :)

Cheers,
Bret

>