Re: RFS : connect : establish ssh connection over socks 4/5 proxies (alt suggested name ssh-connect-proxy)
On 4/25/05, RzR www.rzr.online.fr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used report bug to report an ITP, but another ITP from sonia crossed mine (one of those both needs to be closed) : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306268 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294943 She filed it first. I suggest that you contact her and see if she's still interested in packaging it or not. -- Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: tintin++ -- classic text-based MUD client
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:59:59 -0500, Chris Sacca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Changes: tintin++ (1.93.7-1) unstable; urgency=low . * As of 1.89, tintin++ uses and interal help file, this solves the open bug on the location of the help file (closes: #170252) That should read uses an internal help file. -- Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bplay: help needed!
Hello, bplay seems to be in a bad shape. It has numerous bug reports about endianness/byteswapping problems, which I can't verify, since I only own x86 hardware. So I'd like to ask some kind person to take a look at it, try to run it on your architecture and verify if the bugs are still valid, possibly even look at the code, but don't send me patches yet; just hint me on what might be wrong, if you can, so I can fix it myself and learn a bit more. I've applied other peoples's patches to bplay in the past and it's probably gotten to a very bad point right now. I've looked at #267122 and it seems like semaphores are being freed, but since I have no time or source material to record from using brec, I can't test it myself. The code seems to do the right thing, though. (also, when you download bplay's source code, ignore the latest changelog entry.) Thanks in advance, people! Sincerely, Carlos. -- Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with shlibs
Hi, A package that I maintain -- mp3blaster -- doesn't include libsidplay1 as a dependency, even though it links against it. I hadn't noticed that because I thought everything was working fine, as I hadn't tried to install the package on a cleaner system or a chroot or anything. Anyway: should I declare the dependency manually, or is there a way to make dpkg-shlibdeps recognize libsidplay1 as one of the dependencies? TIA, Carlos. -- Carlos Laviola[EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with shlibs
Hi, A package that I maintain -- mp3blaster -- doesn't include libsidplay1 as a dependency, even though it links against it. I hadn't noticed that because I thought everything was working fine, as I hadn't tried to install the package on a cleaner system or a chroot or anything. Anyway: should I declare the dependency manually, or is there a way to make dpkg-shlibdeps recognize libsidplay1 as one of the dependencies? TIA, Carlos. -- Carlos Laviola[EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org
Re: Packaging CVS snapshots?
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:15:49PM +0100, Amaya wrote: Carlos Laviola dijo: Some folks at #debian-devel suggested me to use dbs, Sorry, what do you exactly mean by dbs? The 'dbs' package :-) Can anyone give me some clues, or could anyone that does/has done this give me a hand? What is exactly what you are having trouble with? Automating? Dealing with CVS stuff? Yes, I would like to know of an easy way to release frequent (weekly, quarterly, monthly) Debian packages of CVS snapshots of certain software like lopster and licq. I am also very interested on this subject, but have limited experience. Just `cvs export` or `cvs-buildpackage` so far :-) That would be cool if one wanted to maintain a CVS repository of his own with his Debian packages, I guess. No? I'm afraid what I want to do here is different... [Probably should be getting more sleep and not being so inquisitive ;-)] We all need to, apparently :)) -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ to hell with icq, use jabber! (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Packaging CVS snapshots?
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:15:49PM +0100, Amaya wrote: Carlos Laviola dijo: Some folks at #debian-devel suggested me to use dbs, Sorry, what do you exactly mean by dbs? The 'dbs' package :-) Can anyone give me some clues, or could anyone that does/has done this give me a hand? What is exactly what you are having trouble with? Automating? Dealing with CVS stuff? Yes, I would like to know of an easy way to release frequent (weekly, quarterly, monthly) Debian packages of CVS snapshots of certain software like lopster and licq. I am also very interested on this subject, but have limited experience. Just `cvs export` or `cvs-buildpackage` so far :-) That would be cool if one wanted to maintain a CVS repository of his own with his Debian packages, I guess. No? I'm afraid what I want to do here is different... [Probably should be getting more sleep and not being so inquisitive ;-)] We all need to, apparently :)) -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ to hell with icq, use jabber! (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK?
Packaging CVS snapshots?
Hello, people, I'm interested in packaging periodic CVS snapshots of licq and lopster for my personal use. Some folks at #debian-devel suggested me to use dbs, but I just couldn't figure out how yet. Can anyone give me some clues, or could anyone that does/has done this give me a hand? Thanks, Carlos. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ Who controls the past, controls the future. (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| Who controls the present, controls the past. http://laviola.org icq #981913 -- George Orwell, 1984 Where do you want to quit HavenCo today? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Packaging CVS snapshots?
Hello, people, I'm interested in packaging periodic CVS snapshots of licq and lopster for my personal use. Some folks at #debian-devel suggested me to use dbs, but I just couldn't figure out how yet. Can anyone give me some clues, or could anyone that does/has done this give me a hand? Thanks, Carlos. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ Who controls the past, controls the future. (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| Who controls the present, controls the past. http://laviola.org icq #981913 -- George Orwell, 1984 Where do you want to quit HavenCo today?
Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found. tags 109629 upstream Bug number 109629 not found. merge 117116 109629 Bug number 109629 not found. I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore? You can. At least I can: http://bugs.debian.org/109629 is reachable. Maybe you've hit a bug somewhere. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ Who controls the past, controls the future. (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| Who controls the present, controls the past. http://laviola.org icq #981913 -- George Orwell, 1984
Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found. tags 109629 upstream Bug number 109629 not found. merge 117116 109629 Bug number 109629 not found. I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore? You can. At least I can: http://bugs.debian.org/109629 is reachable. Maybe you've hit a bug somewhere. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ Who controls the past, controls the future. (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| Who controls the present, controls the past. http://laviola.org icq #981913 -- George Orwell, 1984 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Needa sponsor/advocate
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:48:20PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: Description: Translates text files between Mac, DOS, and Unix formats 'eol' contains 4 programs that help you deal with cross-platform text files: - tounix converts a text file into Unix format (eol=lf) from any format. - tomac converts a text file into Macintosh format (eol=cr) from any format. - todos converts a text file into DOS format (eol=crlf) from any format. - towin converts a text file into DOS format (eol=crlf) from any format. Do you know recode? There's also the ``mtools'' package. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ http://laviola.org Debian-BR Project (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 981913 (icq) debian-br.sf.net Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Needa sponsor/advocate
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:48:20PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: Description: Translates text files between Mac, DOS, and Unix formats 'eol' contains 4 programs that help you deal with cross-platform text files: - tounix converts a text file into Unix format (eol=lf) from any format. - tomac converts a text file into Macintosh format (eol=cr) from any format. - todos converts a text file into DOS format (eol=crlf) from any format. - towin converts a text file into DOS format (eol=crlf) from any format. Do you know recode? There's also the ``mtools'' package. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ http://laviola.org Debian-BR Project (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 981913 (icq) debian-br.sf.net Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594
Re: Lintian error: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version bash
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:20:28AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: I can't find much in Debian policy about this, so I'd like to ask, what does this error mean, and why is it an error? Is it correct that I do not Because bash is essential, in the sense that every Debian system *will* have it installed, so you don't have to worry about people having bash -- they do. It is the same as with build-depending on packages that are build-essential. Lastly, is there a reliable way of confirming that I do not in fact have any bashisms, so that #!/bin/sh would be sufficient? sh is linked to bash, so Get a more bare-bones shell, like 'ash', and try to run your code thru it. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ http://laviola.org Debian-BR Project (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 981913 (icq) debian-br.sf.net Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lintian error: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version bash
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:20:28AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: I can't find much in Debian policy about this, so I'd like to ask, what does this error mean, and why is it an error? Is it correct that I do not Because bash is essential, in the sense that every Debian system *will* have it installed, so you don't have to worry about people having bash -- they do. It is the same as with build-depending on packages that are build-essential. Lastly, is there a reliable way of confirming that I do not in fact have any bashisms, so that #!/bin/sh would be sufficient? sh is linked to bash, so Get a more bare-bones shell, like 'ash', and try to run your code thru it. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ http://laviola.org Debian-BR Project (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 981913 (icq) debian-br.sf.net Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594
Re: debstd woes
On Sun, 20 May 2001 00:42:10 +0200, Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Colin! However, if I run debstd, I get the following: One good question is why are you still using debstd? :) Hiehie, yeah, I discovered that debstd is ancient (so is 3.1.1 standard, we're already at 3.5.2 :P) 3.5.4, actually. Anyway, I fixed it (just used dh_make, etc.) I really think we should drop the debmake package from debian though since this package is really old and just helps to get you on the wrong track. -- Regards Abraham Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding. -- Albert Einstein ___ Abraham vd Merwe [ZR1BBQ] - The Debian Project P.O. Box 3472, Matieland, Stellenbosch, 7602 Cell: +27 82 565 4451 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Http: http://people.debian.org/~abz/ -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ carlos.debian.net Debian-BR Project (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 981913 (icq) debian-br.sf.net Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594 My, how you've changed since I've changed.
Re: debstd woes
On Sun, 20 May 2001 00:42:10 +0200, Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Colin! However, if I run debstd, I get the following: One good question is why are you still using debstd? :) Hiehie, yeah, I discovered that debstd is ancient (so is 3.1.1 standard, we're already at 3.5.2 :P) 3.5.4, actually. Anyway, I fixed it (just used dh_make, etc.) I really think we should drop the debmake package from debian though since this package is really old and just helps to get you on the wrong track. -- Regards Abraham Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding. -- Albert Einstein ___ Abraham vd Merwe [ZR1BBQ] - The Debian Project P.O. Box 3472, Matieland, Stellenbosch, 7602 Cell: +27 82 565 4451 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Http: http://people.debian.org/~abz/ -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ carlos.debian.net Debian-BR Project (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 981913 (icq) debian-br.sf.net Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594 My, how you've changed since I've changed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call for help with mp3kult's postinst
Hello, people, I'm packaging mp3kult (see #94999), and having a bit of trouble to make a perfect debconfized postinst for it. I already have a few nice tests that ensure a more or less smooth installation, but some other tests I plan to include would require MySQL knowledge, which I, unfortunately, do not possess yet (gotta read that O'Reilly book at the library one day). Well, I'd like to ask someone with a medium/good knowledge of MySQL to give me one on one help with mp3kult's postinst. The sources are available at http://people.debian.org/~claviola/debs. Thank you, Carlos. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ carlos.debian.net Debian-BR Project (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 981913 (icq) debian-br.sf.net Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594 When God endowed human beings with brains, He did not intend to guarantee them. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call for help with mp3kult's postinst
Hello, people, I'm packaging mp3kult (see #94999), and having a bit of trouble to make a perfect debconfized postinst for it. I already have a few nice tests that ensure a more or less smooth installation, but some other tests I plan to include would require MySQL knowledge, which I, unfortunately, do not possess yet (gotta read that O'Reilly book at the library one day). Well, I'd like to ask someone with a medium/good knowledge of MySQL to give me one on one help with mp3kult's postinst. The sources are available at http://people.debian.org/~claviola/debs. Thank you, Carlos. -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ carlos.debian.net Debian-BR Project (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 981913 (icq) debian-br.sf.net Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594 When God endowed human beings with brains, He did not intend to guarantee them.
Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29-Apr-2001 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: (At present, boot-floppies is using nano-tiny. It used to use ae.) Good, ae sucks, nano is much better IMO. - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE67KORZAYCJzUW03IRAvCOAJ9B9isxFGObhSM2coAP84nhaRtMggCdGCXl RjjZjGa0G4+aNbiDHniAMME= =4KgA -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: Building dynamic libraries.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-Apr-2001 Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: Is there a ref doc about building packages of dynamic libraries ? I, too, would like some suggestions on more-or-less complex packages that have libs or are lib-only packages, so I can take a look, since I haven't packaged a program with libs yet. - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE64kKCZAYCJzUW03IRAk2dAJ4163AGruFDvEg0iPpnbmZwAFjyDACePJIf hcl3Gi7KX0PycvXFqKtOE2Q= =Mb7X -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Building dynamic libraries.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-Apr-2001 Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: Is there a ref doc about building packages of dynamic libraries ? I, too, would like some suggestions on more-or-less complex packages that have libs or are lib-only packages, so I can take a look, since I haven't packaged a program with libs yet. - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE64kKCZAYCJzUW03IRAk2dAJ4163AGruFDvEg0iPpnbmZwAFjyDACePJIf hcl3Gi7KX0PycvXFqKtOE2Q= =Mb7X -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: Lintian errors and warnings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20-Apr-2001 Bob Hilliard wrote: I am preparing a new release of dictd. Lintian gives the following warnings: W: dictd: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/dictzip .note W: dictd: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/dictzip .comment W: dictd: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/sbin/dictd .note W: dictd: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/sbin/dictd .comment W: dict: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/dict .note W: dict: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/dict .comment Is this a known bug in lintian? I have run strings(1) on these binaries, and have searched the source code for each, and neither .note or .comment appears in any of them. Call strip with '--strip-unneeded' in your debian/rules to strip these sections out of the binaries when building the package. (btw, consider running lintian in verbose mode (with -v), it would have explained you that.) - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE64OlnZAYCJzUW03IRAgBOAJ9Li7RnP/wi5kWYtwuJL9eyT4/1tACeJyWT oqJeVihyamTK6mI9QqNnbzc= =9R7L -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lintian errors and warnings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20-Apr-2001 Bob Hilliard wrote: I am preparing a new release of dictd. Lintian gives the following warnings: W: dictd: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/dictzip .note W: dictd: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/dictzip .comment W: dictd: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/sbin/dictd .note W: dictd: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/sbin/dictd .comment W: dict: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/dict .note W: dict: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/dict .comment Is this a known bug in lintian? I have run strings(1) on these binaries, and have searched the source code for each, and neither .note or .comment appears in any of them. Call strip with '--strip-unneeded' in your debian/rules to strip these sections out of the binaries when building the package. (btw, consider running lintian in verbose mode (with -v), it would have explained you that.) - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE64OlnZAYCJzUW03IRAgBOAJ9Li7RnP/wi5kWYtwuJL9eyT4/1tACeJyWT oqJeVihyamTK6mI9QqNnbzc= =9R7L -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Alpha machine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17-Apr-2001 Davide Puricelli wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 13:03:44 +0200, Russell Coker wrote: What is the name of the Alpha machine for Debian package development? faure.d.o and lully. Whose last update from the LDAP database was in March 4, according to Joy :-( - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE63O2ZZAYCJzUW03IRAl8VAJ9GhIRXSs7sP8aw+oIdFcYIZwyicwCdH6Di ySOz76K6FiPlWpIfY5NgJVg= =gTXB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alpha machine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17-Apr-2001 Davide Puricelli wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 13:03:44 +0200, Russell Coker wrote: What is the name of the Alpha machine for Debian package development? faure.d.o and lully. Whose last update from the LDAP database was in March 4, according to Joy :-( - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE63O2ZZAYCJzUW03IRAl8VAJ9GhIRXSs7sP8aw+oIdFcYIZwyicwCdH6Di ySOz76K6FiPlWpIfY5NgJVg= =gTXB -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: Package installation delay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09-Apr-2001 Carlos Prados Bocos wrote: Hi, I'm a new mantainer. Last week (April 3rd) I uploaded two (new) packages: towitoko (libtowitoko2 and libtowitoko-dev) and pcsc-lite (pcscd, libpcsclite0 and libpcsclite-dev). But I have only received confirmation of the installation of towitoko, and not of pcsc-lite. I only wanted to know if this is normal, or it means that there is something wrong with the second package. In this case, where should I check if there is something wrong? Don't worry, if there is something wrong with your package, you'll receive a message, which will include the address in incoming.debian.org where you'll find the error report. New packages take a little longer than existing packages because afaik the (manual) permission from the ftp-master is required. - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE60kc2ZAYCJzUW03IRAkDAAJ9xIrwTwhpNDhu7cgj9fCBDH9l2bQCeLSkS w8L8n3jr7zFm1IUyge1Gj8A= =mZfH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Package installation delay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09-Apr-2001 Carlos Prados Bocos wrote: Hi, I'm a new mantainer. Last week (April 3rd) I uploaded two (new) packages: towitoko (libtowitoko2 and libtowitoko-dev) and pcsc-lite (pcscd, libpcsclite0 and libpcsclite-dev). But I have only received confirmation of the installation of towitoko, and not of pcsc-lite. I only wanted to know if this is normal, or it means that there is something wrong with the second package. In this case, where should I check if there is something wrong? Don't worry, if there is something wrong with your package, you'll receive a message, which will include the address in incoming.debian.org where you'll find the error report. New packages take a little longer than existing packages because afaik the (manual) permission from the ftp-master is required. - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE60kc2ZAYCJzUW03IRAkDAAJ9xIrwTwhpNDhu7cgj9fCBDH9l2bQCeLSkS w8L8n3jr7zFm1IUyge1Gj8A= =mZfH -END PGP SIGNATURE-
uploading to stable
Hi people, One of my packages (ibrazilian brazilian-conjugate), as in stable currently, is buggy. The version in unstable gracefully fixes them, while it doesn't include any new features (it's a new upstream version, but there is nothing that would screw things up just because of the code changes). What I want to know is, how can I get the package in stable (proposed-updates, at least..), since I'm not supposed to release for both unstable stable? Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 I have a solar vocal ail! PGP signature
uploading to stable
Hi people, One of my packages (ibrazilian brazilian-conjugate), as in stable currently, is buggy. The version in unstable gracefully fixes them, while it doesn't include any new features (it's a new upstream version, but there is nothing that would screw things up just because of the code changes). What I want to know is, how can I get the package in stable (proposed-updates, at least..), since I'm not supposed to release for both unstable stable? Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 I have a solar vocal ail! pgpbmdUAdNXEq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Build-Depends
Hi, I am packaging zclock, a clock applet for GNOME, and it depends on a lot of gnome libs and headers to compile. While I was able to determine a few of the -dev packages I must declare as build-dependencies, I am sure that I'm missing some. What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't missing build-depends? Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 I have a solar vocal ail! pgp362ymmuIXd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: transition from /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc
On 30-Mar-2001 Shaul Karl wrote: Hi folks, For the last couple of couple of couple of hours, I have been trying every possible thing to make two packages I just adopted (ibrazilian and brazilian-conjugate) go outside of /usr/doc. I am attaching the diff-only patch to the ibrazilian source code in this e-mail (very small). Hopefully someone will be able to give me a hand, because I am getting tired of trying to achieve this.. :( Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 I have a solar vocal ail! What do you mean by `go outside of /usr/doc'? Currently /usr/doc/package should still be there (it is a symlink). Read section 13.4 of policy. Or did I misunderstood you? Yes. I'm afraid I used a confusing wording. What I meant was that I wanted to make the packages do the transition from /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc, not that I wanted to stop creating the symlink. In fact, I *want* it to create the symlink, but it seems like it doesn't: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -ld /usr/doc/ibrazilian/ drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Mar 30 00:12 /usr/doc/ibrazilian/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ I'm beginning to get annoyed :( Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 I have a solar vocal ail! pgpnHU2Z5JgKf.pgp Description: PGP signature
transition from /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc
Hi folks, For the last couple of couple of couple of hours, I have been trying every possible thing to make two packages I just adopted (ibrazilian and brazilian-conjugate) go outside of /usr/doc. I am attaching the diff-only patch to the ibrazilian source code in this e-mail (very small). Hopefully someone will be able to give me a hand, because I am getting tired of trying to achieve this.. :( Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 I have a solar vocal ail! ibrazilian_2.4-2.diff.gz PGP signature
transition from /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc
Hi folks, For the last couple of couple of couple of hours, I have been trying every possible thing to make two packages I just adopted (ibrazilian and brazilian-conjugate) go outside of /usr/doc. I am attaching the diff-only patch to the ibrazilian source code in this e-mail (very small). Hopefully someone will be able to give me a hand, because I am getting tired of trying to achieve this.. :( Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 I have a solar vocal ail! ibrazilian_2.4-2.diff.gz Description: ibrazilian_2.4-2.diff.gz pgp8dite4OQPR.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: dh_installman and X11 apps
On 10-Mar-2001 Wouter de Vries wrote: Hi, I was wondering how to install man pages in the X11 man directory with dh_installman. I have read the manual, but it is not in there. Lintian keeps giving me warnings about the manual being in the wrong place, so now I put the X11 app in /usr/bin (shame on me!).. Please help me out. You're not supposed to put the manpage wherever you want to, even if it is a X program. dh_installman puts the manpages into their respective sections, e.g. if you have foo.1, it'll be but on section 1. If you have foo.1x, it'll be but at /usr/X11R6/man/man1 for being in X's section 1. (Please correct me if wrong) -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 PGP signature
RE: dh_installman and X11 apps
On 10-Mar-2001 Wouter de Vries wrote: Hi, I was wondering how to install man pages in the X11 man directory with dh_installman. I have read the manual, but it is not in there. Lintian keeps giving me warnings about the manual being in the wrong place, so now I put the X11 app in /usr/bin (shame on me!).. Please help me out. You're not supposed to put the manpage wherever you want to, even if it is a X program. dh_installman puts the manpages into their respective sections, e.g. if you have foo.1, it'll be but on section 1. If you have foo.1x, it'll be but at /usr/X11R6/man/man1 for being in X's section 1. (Please correct me if wrong) -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 pgpb0w5HCik01.pgp Description: PGP signature
Sponsorship for oonsoo and xdiskusage
Hello folks, I have two packages ready waiting until I get my own account or a sponsorship, available at the following apt-gettable location: deb http://www.brfree.com.br/~claviola/debian unstable main deb-src http://www.brfree.com.br/~claviola/debian unstable main If you think the packages are ok to be uploaded and would like to sponsor them, please contact me. Note that oonsoo is currently orphaned and has a bug tagged serious (#84651) filed against it (which I fixed) and xdiskusage has been RFP'ed two weeks ago. Thanks, Carlos -- How much Spruce would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck Spruce? A woodchuck would chuck all the Spruce he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck Spruce.
