Re: help with sbuild error
Hi Rebecca, On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 3:09 AM Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > > > ccache: error: Failed to create directory > > /sbuild-nonexistent/.ccache/tmp: Permission denied > > You are using a build tool which expects a writable home directory, > which does not necessarily exist in build chroots. > > Setting debhelper compat to 13 may help: > https://sources.debian.org/src/debhelper/13.1/debhelper.pod/#L1088 > Thanks!! it worked. Best regards. Elías Alejandro
help with sbuild error
'' --fhead '' --vhead ' <@type@ id="io.gitlab.Goodvibes.@EnumName@">' --vprod '' --vtail ' ' --ftail '' /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../data/../src/ui/gv-main-window.h /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../data/../src/ui/gv-status-icon.h ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. dh_auto_build: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 ninja -j4 -v returned exit code 1 make: *** [debian/rules:7: build] Error 25 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2 Build finished at 2020-06-12T20:54:58Z Finished +--+ | Cleanup | +--+ Purging /<> Not cleaning session: cloned chroot in use E: Build failure (dpkg-buildpackage died) Best regards, Elías Alejandro
Re: Ouput of reprotest under salsa-ci
Hi Iñaki, On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:53:26AM +0200, Inaki Malerba wrote: > Hi Elías, > > There's a tool to compare this kind of differences called Diffoscope[0]. > > You can download both packages from the Salsa CI pipeline (from the > build job and from the reprotest job) and use Diffoscope to compare them. > > Also, you can enable 2 features on the Salsa CI pipeline to help you > debugging this: you can run diffoscope directly on the reprotest job [1] > which will tell you more details about the problem directly on the log, > and you can split reprotest variations [2] into different jobs to > identify which one is causing the problems on your package. > > Abrazos! > > > 0_ https://diffoscope.org/ > 1_ > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline#running-reprotest-with-diffoscope > 2_ > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline#breaking-up-the-reprotest-job-into-the-different-variations Thanks for your help! Listo. ¡Muchas gracias! :) Best regards. Elías Alejandro
Ouput of reprotest under salsa-ci
Hello all, I have a dummy question about the output of reprotest under the salsa-ci process. -How can I interpret or understand the following output log?: Binary files /builds/elias-guest/gpick/debian/output/reprotest/control/source-root/gpick-dbgsym_0.2.6~rc1-3+salsaci_amd64.deb and /builds/elias-guest/gpick/debian/output/reprotest/experiment-1/source-root/gpick-dbgsym_0.2.6~rc1-3+salsaci_amd64.deb differ The complete log is[1] I've downloaded the artifacts to look into the files and I've found that the binary executables are differ with pkgdiff but with hex numbers. Do you know where are the 'diff issues' for fix them? or How can I get a complete information about them? [1]https://salsa.debian.org/elias-guest/gpick/-/jobs/653651/raw Thanks for your valuable help. Best regards. Elías Alejandro
Re: Question about blocked package to testing
Hi Robin, On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 09:46:34AM +0200, Robin Gustafsson wrote: > Hi Elías, > > > -Under build system it's fine [2] but with salsa-ci pipeline[3] it fails. > > Do you know why? > > The error in the build output [1] implies that GPICK_BUILD_DATE is > expected, but not found, among the environment variables. You probably > have it set in your local environment, but it's not being set > automatically and thus it's not being set in the CI pipeline. > > I'm not so sure that the status in buildd should be interpreted as > proof of a successful (automated) build. The QA page states that it > was "Not built on buildd" [2] because you uploaded it pre-built. > Yeap, I've fixed GPICK_BUILD_DATE value and now it works fine. > > How can I test under a local environment? > > I find sbuild [3] to be very helpful. It'll probably produce the same > error for you locally. > sbuild helped me to test and finally fix this issue. Thanks a lot! Best regards. Elías Alejandro
Re: Question about blocked package to testing
Dear Thibaut, On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 09:08:00AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Dear Elias, > > You can (and probably should) build your package using sbuild and > configure it to run autopkgtest after build. > > when sbuild is set-up, you can also run autopkgtest manually in its schroot. > > Your test tries to open a display. This is not possible on the build and > test infrastructure (the machines are headless). You have two options: > > - skip this test ; > > - run this test within a virtual X server. I do this in Yorick. See: > > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/yorick/-/blob/master/debian/tests/control > > The test depends on package xvfb and the test command is wrapped in a > call to xvfb-run. > > > -Should I do a new upload version to fix it? or just fix it under salsa? > > You need to upload it. > > > -Under build system it's fine [2] but with salsa-ci pipeline[3] it fails. > > Do you know why? > > Is the test run during build ? > After building process with sbuild, but I've found what the problem is. Thanks! Within the next hours I'll upload a new version fixing this issues. Thanks again! Best regards. Elías Alejandro
Question about blocked package to testing
Hello all I have a question about a package which have a delayed transition to testing. Gpick package has fixed under unstable a bug related with python3 migration but it's blocked because of regression.[1] -Do you know how to fix this regression block? How can I test under a local environment? -Should I do a new upload version to fix it? or just fix it under salsa? -Under build system it's fine [2] but with salsa-ci pipeline[3] it fails. Do you know why? [1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gpick [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gpick [3] https://salsa.debian.org/elias-guest/gpick/pipelines/120059 Thanks for your valuable help. Best regards. Elías Alejandro
Re: Help with source only upload
>The command is the same, isn't it? uhm.. I don't think so. I was reading about to source-only uploads because of[1] however I've uploaded by _mistake_ with a changes file included binary and source, after some hours I've noticed that it hasn't been built by buildd[2]. I'd like to generate a changes file for a new debian version of the package with only the source. I was reading also that if version ends in -0 or -1 source can be included but not for the next version, I'm not sure if it's the explanation. In other hand, why buildd wasn't be able to built if the changes file also included the source file? [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sugar-log-activity Best regards, Elías
Help with source only upload
Hello, I hope you are doing well. Do you know what's the option to generate with gbp a Source Only Upload for packages after its first debian release? The following sentence: gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder --git-pbuilder-options=--source-only-changes works fine for package_version-1 but I'd like to do the same for package_version-2 and generate the source-only .changes file Best regards. Elías
lintian and meson
Hello all, Do you know how can I solve this problem? N:The binary is installed as a detached "debug symbols" ELF file, but it N:does not appear to have debug information associated with it. N: N:A common cause is not passing -g to GCC when compiling. N: N:Implementation detail: Lintian checks for the ".debug_line" and the N:".debug_str" sections. If either of these are present, the binary is N:assumed to contain debug information. N: N:Refer to https://bugs.debian.org/668437 for details. N: N:Severity: normal, Certainty: possible N: N:Check: binaries, Type: binary, udeb N: W: goodvibes-dbgsym: debug-file-with-no-debug-symbols usr/lib/debug/.build-id/7f/8b454173ee4b7b226b21f361a7aab6c777a0ec.debug I've tried adding 'debugoptimized' as buildtype under meson.build without success. Thanks. Elías Alejandro
Question about meson and hardening
Hello all, I was working in a new package which has meson as build system. I've updated debian/rules to use the hardening flags (I've tried all the options?) but after building Lintian says: I: goodvibes: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/goodvibes N: N:This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the use of fortified libc N:functions. Either there are no potentially unfortified functions called N:by any routines, all unfortified calls have already been fully validated N:at compile-time, or the package was not built with the default Debian N:compiler flags defined by dpkg-buildflags. If built using N:dpkg-buildflags directly, be sure to import CPPFLAGS. N: N:NB: Due to false-positives, Lintian ignores some unprotected functions N:(e.g. memcpy). N: N:Refer to https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening and N:https://bugs.debian.org/673112 for details. N: N:Severity: normal, Certainty: wild-guess N: N:Check: binaries, Type: binary, udeb N: I: goodvibes: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/goodvibes-client debian/rules: #!/usr/bin/make -f export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -g -Wall -pedantic export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed %: dh $@ --buildsystem=meson override_dh_installchangelogs: dh_installchangelogs NEWS Meson is new for me, I was looking at some gnome packages and I was trying to do the same but without success. Do you know any advice? I'm attaching upstream meson.build file. Thanks. Best regards, Elías meson.build Description: Binary data
Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]
Thanks! :D Best regards, Elías Alejandro On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Monday, April 23 2018, Elías Alejandro wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior >> wrote: >>> Something else worth mentioning is the possibility to move the package >>> repository from your personal namespace to the Debian namespace. Please >>> let me know if you have interest and I can set a repository there for >>> you. >> That could be great! Please let me know when you set a new repository. >> Thanks Sergio! > > Done: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/goodvibes > > I've added you as a Master, so you can set the repository up as you > wish. > > Cheers, > > -- > Sergio > GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 > Please send encrypted e-mail if possible > http://sergiodj.net/
Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Something else worth mentioning is the possibility to move the package > repository from your personal namespace to the Debian namespace. Please > let me know if you have interest and I can set a repository there for > you. That could be great! Please let me know when you set a new repository. Thanks Sergio! Best regards, Elías Alejandro
Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior
wrote:
> On Sunday, April 22 2018, I wrote:
>
>> On d/control, I see you explicitly listed the dependencies ("Depends:"
>> field). Some of them are OK to be there, but you actually need to
>> explicitly list these:
>
> Sorry, I meant "you actually *don't* need to explicitly list these:".
>
Ok. I've just uploaded to mentors.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/goodvibes
Best regards,
Elías Alejandro
Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "goodvibes" * Package name: goodvibes Version : 0.3.6-1 Upstream Author : Arnaud Rebillout * URL : http://goodvibes.readthedocs.io/ * License : GPL-3 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: goodvibes - lightweight internet radio player To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/goodvibes Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/goodvibes/goodvibes_0.3.6-1.dsc More information about goodbives can be obtained from http://goodvibes.readthedocs.io/ Changes since the last upload: Initial release (Closes: #890420) Regards, Elías Alejandro
Re: question about lintian overrides
Hello Paul, On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:03 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Elías Alejandro wrote: > >> "Exec=env GDK_BACKEND=x11 uget-gtk %u" > > I'm guessing this will break for users running apps under Wayland > instead of X11. I think it would be best to remove "env > GDK_BACKEND=x11" so that Wayland works and the lintian warning goes > away. > You might be right. I will write to the upstream about this. Thanks. Best regards. Elías Alejandro
Re: question about lintian overrides
Hello Ben, On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > Elías Alejandro writes: > >> W: uget: desktop-command-not-in-package >> usr/share/applications/uget-gtk.desktop env >> I've checked the file "uget-gtk.desktop" (created by the upstream) and >> there's a line: >> "Exec=env GDK_BACKEND=x11 uget-gtk %u" > > In your opinion, is there a better way to do this? Can the ‘Exec’ value > be re-written so it detects correctly as a command provided by the > package? > I think so. I've found some patches to face with Wayland and X11. >> I was thinking solve this issue with an override lintian file: >> uget.lintian-overrides >> but I still get this warning. > > You will need to show the content of that file before we can say what > might be wrong with it. > ok. I've just found my mistake. It was related with the format. >> Do you have experience with this issue? Maybe override it can be a bad >> option? > > Maybe; with your knowledge as a maintainer of that package, you might > find a more suitable change that upstream can use. > you are right. Thanks. >> Please cc'me. > > Please subscribe to this forum, in order to participate more smoothly. > Done. Thanks for your time. Best regards. Elías Alejandro
question about lintian overrides
Hello all, I was running "lintian -i -I --pedantic" and I get: W: uget: desktop-command-not-in-package usr/share/applications/uget-gtk.desktop env I've checked the file "uget-gtk.desktop" (created by the upstream) and there's a line: "Exec=env GDK_BACKEND=x11 uget-gtk %u" I was thinking solve this issue with an override lintian file: uget.lintian-overrides but I still get this warning. Do you have experience with this issue? Maybe override it can be a bad option? My lintian versión: 2.5.72 Please cc'me. Thanks! Elías
Re: Question about watch file
Hello Eriberto, On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:04:50PM -0300, Eriberto wrote: > > Hi Elías, > > You can try it: > > version=4 > http://sf.net/urlget/ .*stable.*/uget-([\d.]+)\.tar\.(?:bz2|gz|xz) It works fine! Thanks a lot Eriberto! =) Best regards, Elías Alejandro
Question about watch file
Hello everyone, I'm trying to get a correct debian/watch file for my package. The upstream source is from sourceforge[1] but it has a white space in the path[2]. I'd like to get the lastest source from "uget (stable)" but under the normal case I only get the source from "uget (developing)". Normal case: version=4 http://sf.net/urlget/uget-([0-9].+)\.(?:tar\.gz) In this case I only get the lastest "uget (developing)" source. I was trying with: version=4 http://sf.net/urlget/uget\040\(stable\)(.*) But I only get all files from "uget (stable)" and whenever I wanted to be more specify I couldn't be able to get the lastest version. Do you know if it's a special case? I'd glad if you can help me. Thanks. [1]https://sourceforge.net/projects/urlget/files/?source=navbar [2]https://sourceforge.net/projects/urlget/files/uget%20%28stable%29/ Best regard, Elías Alejandro
Re: Trouble with debsign, dput
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello > >>Ok Ben. I've just reported this bug. Thanks! > > > I think you can use dput-ng in the meanwhile, I find it > superior for my needs :) > (I don't want/care about a new flame war, I used dput for a while, > and then switched to dput-ng after some issues I encountered that > I can't recall now) Ok Gianfranco. Thanks. I will take that into account your advice. :) Best regards, Elías Alejandro
Re: Trouble with debsign, dput
Ok Ben. I've just reported this bug. Thanks! Best regards, Elías Alejandro
Trouble with debsign, dput
Dear all, Recently I wanted to sign my package with debsign and then upload to debian mentors but I got an error, the steps was the following: $ debsign gpick_0.2.5+git20161221-1_i386.changes Successfully signed dsc and changes files $ dput mentors gpick_0.2.5+git20161221-1_i386.changes Checking signature on .changes gpgme: /tmp/gpick_upload/gpick_0.2.5+git20161221-1_i386.changes: error 55: Invalid value (7, 55, u'Invalid value') I've tried with: debsign -pgpg2 gpick_0.2.5+git20161221-1_i386.changes but I got the same "Invalid value". Do you know about this error? Thanks! Versions: debsign: 2.16.13 dput: 0.11.0 Best regards, Elías Alejandro
Re: Building package under kfreebsd/hurd
Thanks!. I will try your suggestions. Best regards. Elías On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 11/07/2016 12:46 AM, Elías Alejandro wrote: >> I wonder if there's a way to build packages for distinct >> architectures, specifically for >> Hurd or Kfreebsd. Do I have to create a new installation or use qemu?. > > In my experience the easiest way to do so is to use a virtual > machine (I prefer libvirt + virt-manager with Qemu for that), > boot the machine, install an SSH server and > > In the case of Hurd, you really don't want to use that on your > bare-metal hardware, because last time I checked it didn't > support USB yet. (If you don't need USB you can of course use > it. ;-)) kFreeBSD is not a problem in that regard, but unless > your system is really RAM-starved a VM is still much easier to > handle. > > Note that it's not completely trivial to set up these machines. > The problem is that most installation media you can find are > a bit older, and if you've ever tried to install testing/sid > with an older installer, you can see that it often doesn't > quite work because sid will have moved on quite a bit. Plus > a lot of the documentation you find is a bit outdated for > both archs - there is more current documentation, but when > searching you more often than not find the outdated docs in > my experience, before you find the current ones. > > In the case of Hurd Samuel Thibault provides premade images > you can use: > https://people.debian.org/~sthibault/hurd-i386/README > https://people.debian.org/~sthibault/hurd-i386/ > I suspect that's going to be the easiest way of setting up a > VM there. (Please do a dist-upgraded before you actually use > them to try stuff though, they are relatively up to date, but > aren't daily images.) > > In the case of kFreeBSD, I'm not completely sure anymore, > but if I remember correctly, I used the Jessie rc3 installer > to install the VM and then dist-upgraded to sid (by changing > the sources.list): > http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/jessie_di_rc3/kfreebsd-amd64/iso-cd/ > (That may or may not work, depending on whether I remember > correctly.) > > In both cases (Hurd, kFreeBSD) please be aware that while a > lot of the everyday userland is still the same as with the > Linux ports (e.g. ls, cp, etc.), many administrative commands > are quite different or at least have different options / a > different output. Especially Hurd can be quite weird when you > first come in contact with it; once you get to know some of > the concepts and ideas behind it, it's actually really cool, > but there's a bit of a learning curve there. > > Hope that helps. > >> [1]https://wiki.debian.org/qemubuilder > > I haven't tried that yet, but from reading the wiki page it > looks to me that it's mostly a Linux thing - and while there > is no inherent reason why fully-fledged VMs with Hurd or > kFreeBSD wouldn't work in principle with something like that, > I suspect that you'd need to fix a lot of things to make it > work. (I may be wrong though.) It's probably easier to just > use a virtual machine manually yourself. > > Regards, > Christian
Building package under kfreebsd/hurd
Hello, I wonder if there's a way to build packages for distinct architectures, specifically for Hurd or Kfreebsd. Do I have to create a new installation or use qemu?. My PC is a i386 and I want to fix a FTBFS bug for these architectures. I was reading about qemubuilder[1] but I couldn't see a specific workaround for these architectures. [1]https://wiki.debian.org/qemubuilder Best regards, Elías Alejandro
Re: Packaging upstream snapshot, merging error
Thanks Andrey, I've found my error. Downloaded zip from upstream git repo, it has a .gitignore file which should be removed because already there's another under collab-maint repo. Best regards. Elias Alejandro
Packaging upstream snapshot, merging error
Dear all, I want to package an upstream snapshot from a git repository, however I get errors importing with Basically first I download the directory from upstream git repository, and renamed to package~git20161017 and then compress it as package~git20161017.orig.tar.gz I take this new tarball to use the tool (under collab-maint git repo): gbp import-orig --verbose --pristine-tar /path/to/tarball/package~git20161017.orig.tar.gz But I get an error merging with the master branch: $ gbp import-orig --verbose --pristine-tar /home/elias/devel/gpick/gpick_0.2.5~git20161017.orig.tar.gz gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--show-cdup'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--is-bare-repository'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'for-each-ref', '--format=%(refname:short)', 'refs/heads/'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'show-ref', 'refs/heads/upstream'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'status', '--porcelain'] What is the upstream version? [0.2.5~git20161017] gbp:debug: ['git', 'tag', '-l', 'upstream/0.2.5_git20161017'] gbp:debug: tar ['-C', '../tmptYqlLL', '-a', '-xf', '/home/elias/devel/gpick/gpick_0.2.5~git20161017.orig.tar.gz'] [] gbp:debug: Unpacked '/home/elias/devel/gpick/gpick_0.2.5~git20161017.orig.tar.gz' to '../tmptYqlLL/gpick_0.2.5~git20161017' gbp:info: Importing '/home/elias/devel/gpick/gpick_0.2.5~git20161017.orig.tar.gz' to branch 'upstream'... gbp:info: Source package is gpick gbp:info: Upstream version is 0.2.5~git20161017 gbp:debug: ['git', 'show-ref', 'refs/heads/upstream'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--quiet', '--verify', 'upstream'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'add', '-f', '.'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'write-tree'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--quiet', '--verify', 'upstream'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'commit-tree', 'd2ffad3d57a44a2d31da4d268a5a3dfd787ca630', '-p', '4b7087b6ddf4f064f886abdaea8130cb1f68b744'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'update-ref', 'refs/heads/upstream', 'a16d357857b8229f228fed6ad87c7ab58809f2e6', '4b7087b6ddf4f064f886abdaea8130cb1f68b744'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'show-ref', 'refs/heads/pristine-tar'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--quiet', '--verify', 'pristine-tar'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'ls-tree', '-z', 'upstream', '--'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'mktree', '-z'] gbp:debug: /usr/bin/pristine-tar [] ['commit', '/home/elias/devel/gpick/gpick_0.2.5~git20161017.orig.tar.gz', 'd2ffad3d57a44a2d31da4d268a5a3dfd787ca630'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'tag', '-m', 'Upstream version 0.2.5~git20161017', 'upstream/0.2.5_git20161017', 'a16d357857b8229f228fed6ad87c7ab58809f2e6'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'show-ref', 'refs/heads/master'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--quiet', '--verify', 'master'] gbp:info: Merging to 'master' gbp:debug: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', 'HEAD'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'show-ref', 'refs/heads/master'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', 'HEAD'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'show-ref', 'refs/heads/master'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'help', 'merge', '-m'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'merge', '--no-summary', '--no-edit', 'upstream/0.2.5_git20161017'] gbp:error: Automatic merge failed. gbp:error: Error detected, Will roll back changes. gbp:info: Rolling back branch upstream by resetting it to 4b7087b6ddf4f064f886abdaea8130cb1f68b744 gbp:debug: ['git', 'update-ref', '-m', 'gbp import-orig: failure rollback of upstream', 'refs/heads/upstream', '4b7087b6ddf4f064f886abdaea8130cb1f68b744'] gbp:info: Rolling back branch pristine-tar by resetting it to 14cb9c869b865dd1fb3093593ed8d106d5d2dd67 gbp:debug: ['git', 'update-ref', '-m', 'gbp import-orig: failure rollback of pristine-tar', 'refs/heads/pristine-tar', '14cb9c869b865dd1fb3093593ed8d106d5d2dd67'] gbp:info: Rolling back tag upstream/0.2.5_git20161017 by deleting it gbp:debug: ['git', 'tag', '-l', 'upstream/0.2.5_git20161017'] gbp:debug: ['git', 'tag', '-d', 'upstream/0.2.5_git20161017'] gbp:info: Rolling back branch master by resetting it to fa16c335847412ab4f29869f88d9a6214a234baf gbp:debug: ['git', 'update-ref', '-m', 'gbp import-orig: failure rollback of master', 'refs/heads/master', 'fa16c335847412ab4f29869f88d9a6214a234baf'] gbp:info: Rolling back failed merge of upstream/0.2.5_git20161017 gbp:debug: ['git', 'merge', '--abort'] gbp:error: Rolled back changes after import error. gbp:debug: rm ['-rf', '../tmptYqlLL'] [] Another question: What's the difference between package~git20161017.orig.tar.gz and package+git20161017.orig.tar.gz because I've seen packages with these kind of names. I've also made this change but I still get the same error. Regards, Elías Alejandro
Bug#831411: RFS: jigzo/0.6.1-7 RC
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: RC Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jigzo" * Package name: jigzo Version : 0.6.1-7 Upstream Author : Maarten de Boer * URL : http://www.resorama.com/jigzo * License : GPL-2+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: jigzo - Photo puzzle game for children jigzo-data - data of Photo puzzle game for children To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/jigzo Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jigzo/jigzo_0.6.1-7.dsc Changes since the last upload: jigzo (0.6.1-7) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix FTBFS with gcc6: add patch 07_gcc_6.patch (Closes: #811796) * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8 * Bump debhelper build-dep and compat to 9 * debian/rules with extra option to make hardening better * Improving hardening: add 08_hardening.patch * debian/copyright update * Remove jigzo.menu (Closes: #737932) * jigzo.desktop: add keywords entry Regards, Elías Alejandro
Re: pbuilder error
ok. thanks for your valuable help. I could solve this issue running. pbuilder clean and the error is gone. Best regards, Elías Alejandro On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 07/06/2016 06:55 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Sometimes I'm behind a proxy, and I get a *lot* of hash sum mismatches > > when using pbuilder/sbuild. > > On actual package files or just the "Packages" / "Contents" > files while pbuilder is doing "apt-get update"? If it's the > latter, that problem should not exist anymore for stretch > and/or sid (search "by-hash" in that email): > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/06/msg2.html > > If it's for packages themselves, then something's wrong with > your proxy, because that should definitely not happen. > (Package file names are unique in the proper Debian archive, > so it should never be the the case that a package file is > replaced.) > > > Retry the build works, but I have to say, packages are put in aptcache > > only when the md5 is verified AFAIK, so the question is: > > how a broken md5 did end up in that directory in first place? > > I agree, hence I assume this happened by means of "out of disk > space" (look at the errror message) while copying back the > cached contents (at the end of a build). Don't know for sure, > though. > > Regards, > Christian >
pbuilder error
Hi all, Yesterday and today I was trying to build my package however I get an error. I've updated pbuilder tarball with 'update' but it seems no works. Package: pbuilder Version: 0.225.1 If you know any answer please cc'me. Thanks in advance. Best regards. Elías Alejandro Current status: 0 (-1) broken. -> Finished parsing the build-deps Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following additional packages will be installed: libfakeroot The following NEW packages will be installed: fakeroot libfakeroot 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/132 kB of archives. After this operation, 360 kB of additional disk space will be used. debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed Selecting previously unselected package libfakeroot:i386. (Reading database ... 26415 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../libfakeroot_1.21-1_i386.deb ... Unpacking libfakeroot:i386 (1.21-1) ... dpkg-deb (subprocess): decompressing archive member: lzma error: compressed data is corrupt dpkg-deb: error: subprocess returned error exit status 2 dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libfakeroot_1.21-1_i386.deb (--unpack): cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libfakeroot/libfakeroot-tcp.so' to '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libfakeroot/libfakeroot-tcp.so.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream dpkg-deb: error: '/var/cache/apt/archives/fakeroot_1.21-1_i386.deb' is not a debian format archive dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/fakeroot_1.21-1_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess dpkg-deb --control returned error exit status 2 Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.23-1) ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libfakeroot_1.21-1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/fakeroot_1.21-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I: Copying back the cached apt archive contents I: unmounting dev/pts filesystem I: unmounting run/shm filesystem I: unmounting proc filesystem I: unmounting sys filesystem I: cleaning the build env I: removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build/9856 and its subdirectories
Bug#800783: RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-4 RC
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radiotray" * Package name: radiotray Version : 0.7.3-4 Upstream Author : Carlos Ribeiro * URL : http://radiotray.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-3 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: radiotray - online radio streaming player To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/radiotray Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radiotray/radiotray_0.7.3-4.dsc Changes since the last upload: radiotray (0.7.3-4) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control + Updating to Gstreamer 1.x (Closes: #785877) Regards, Elías Alejandro
Bug#762995: RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2 [RC]
reopen 762995 retitle 762995 RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2 [RC] It is still alive!. Looking for a sponsor! On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 04:27:26PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package: > > #762995: RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2 > > It has been closed by Bart Martens . > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Bart Martens > by > replying to this email. > > > -- > 762995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762995 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems > Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:26:26 + > From: Bart Martens > To: 762995-d...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: closing RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2 > > Package radiotray has been removed from mentors. Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radiotray" * Package name: radiotray Version : 0.7.3-2 Upstream Author : Carlos Ribeiro * URL : http://www.radiotray.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-1+ Section : sound It builds those binary packages: radiotray - online radio streaming player To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/radiotray Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radiotray/radiotray_0.7.3-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * debian/control + Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 + Canonicalize VCS-* fields * debian/patches/02_compatibility_glib-2.41.patch: Added.(Closes: #762630) + This allow fix the crash during startup because of new version of glib Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141001141020.GA3276@supersonic
Bug#762995: RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 03:35:51AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:33:32PM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote: > > > > * Drop lintian override for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature > > > It's still present. > > > > > My mistake. It should be 'Add' instead, I've fixed it. > I think the consensus is not to override this tag just because the > upstream doesn't provide signatures. Ok no problem. Do you know where can I learn more about this consensus? I've just uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radiotray Best regards. -- Elías -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140928211601.GA3674@supersonic
Bug#762995: RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2
Hi Andrey, On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 01:54:08PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > * debian/control > > + Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 > The current Policy version is 3.9.6. > You are right. No found changes, I've updated Standards version. > > * Drop lintian override for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature > It's still present. > My mistake. It should be 'Add' instead, I've fixed it. Once again available in: http://mentors.debian.net/package/radiotray Thanks for your help. Best regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140927173259.GA14813@supersonic
Bug#762995: RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radiotray" * Package name: radiotray Version : 0.7.3-2 Upstream Author : Carlos Ribeiro * URL : http://radiotray.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-3 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: radiotray - online radio streaming player To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/radiotray Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radiotray/radiotray_0.7.3-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * debian/control + Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 + Canonicalize VCS-* fields * Drop lintian override for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature * debian/patches/02_compatibility_glib-2.41.patch: Added.(Closes: #762630) + This allow fix the crash during startup because of new version of glib Regards, Elías Alejandro
Re: RFS: bygfoot/2.3.2-2
Hi Vincent. Thanks a lot for your help :) Best regards. Elías Alejandro On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Elías Alejandro wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: normal > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bygfoot" > > > > * Package name: bygfoot > >Version : 2.3.2-2 > >Upstream Author : > > * URL : > > * License : GPL > >Section : games > > > > It builds those binary packages: > > > > bygfoot- football (a.k.a soccer) management game > > bygfoot-data - data of football (a.k.a soccer) management game > > > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > > following URL: > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/bygfoot > > > > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this > command: > > > > dget -x > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot/bygfoot_2.3.2-2.dsc > > > > More information about hello can be obtained from > http://www.example.com. > > > > Changes since the last upload: > > > >* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 > >* Bump debhelper to 9 > >* Create a valid desktop file. Add keywords and a comment in German > > Thanks to Markus Koschany > >* bygfoot.menu: Use the absolute icon path to display the menu icon > > Thanks to Markus Koschany (Closes: #737839) > > > > Built, signed, and uploaded; thanks for your work! > > Regards, > Vincent >
RFS: bygfoot/2.3.2-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bygfoot" * Package name: bygfoot Version : 2.3.2-2 Upstream Author : * URL : * License : GPL Section : games It builds those binary packages: bygfoot- football (a.k.a soccer) management game bygfoot-data - data of football (a.k.a soccer) management game To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bygfoot Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot/bygfoot_2.3.2-2.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 * Bump debhelper to 9 * Create a valid desktop file. Add keywords and a comment in German Thanks to Markus Koschany * bygfoot.menu: Use the absolute icon path to display the menu icon Thanks to Markus Koschany (Closes: #737839) Regards, Elías Alejandro
Bug#704644: RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radiotray" * Package name: radiotray Version : 0.7.3-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Ribeiro * URL : http://radiotray.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-1+ Section : sound It builds those binary packages: radiotray - online radio streaming player To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/radiotray Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radiotray/radiotray_0.7.3-1.dsc More information about radiotray can be obtained from http://radiotray.sourceforge.net/ Also: Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/radiotray.git Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/radiotray.git;a=summary Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release (Closes: #703385) * Bump debhelper to 9 * debian/control + Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4 * debian/copyright + Added new copyright owners Regards, Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130403220216.GB3011@supersonic
Bug#704643: RFS: pidgin-latex/1.5.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-latex" * Package name: pidgin-latex Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Moll * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex * License : GPL-2+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: pidgin-latex - Pidgin plugin to display LaTeX formulas To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pidgin-latex Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex_1.5.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 * Bump debhelper compat to 9 * Upstream fixed background color in rendered images (Closes: #699009) * debian/copyright + Updated copyright format * debian/rules + Append CPPFLAGS to CFLAGS Regards, Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130403215423.GA3011@supersonic
Bug#685345: RFS: pidgin-latex
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:09:24PM +, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Elías, > > You wrote: > > This version fix a security issue > > If you want that fixed in wheezy, then I suggest to limit the changes in the > package to only the changes directly related to the fix for the security > issue. > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html Ok. Links under Debian Mentors are: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pidgin-latex Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex_1.4.4-2.dsc Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120831012743.GA14558@supersonic
RFS: pidgin-latex/1.4.4-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-latex" * Package name: pidgin-latex Version : 1.4.4-2 Upstream Author : Benjamin Moll * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: pidgin-latex - Pidgin plugin to display LaTeX formulas To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pidgin-latex Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex_1.4.4-2.dsc NOTE: This version fix a security issue, please refer to: http://pidgin-latex.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex/CHANGELOG?r1=1.4&r2=1.5 Changes since the last upload: * Bump debhelper to 9 * debian/copyright + Update format as in Debian Policy 3.9.3 * debian/control + Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 * debian/rules + Append CPPFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags as hardening option * debian/patches/01_security_issue.patch: Added. (Closes: #685888) + This fix insufficient validation of LaTeX code and avoid access to user local information. * Corrected lintian warning + Added missing license paragraph in debian/copyright file Regards, Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120828110054.GA2882@supersonic
Bug#685345: RFS: pidgin-latex/1.4.5-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-latex" * Package name: pidgin-latex Version : 1.4.5-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Moll * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: pidgin-latex - Pidgin plugin to display LaTeX formulas To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pidgin-latex Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex_1.4.5-1.dsc NOTE: This version fix a security issue, please refer to: http://pidgin-latex.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex/CHANGELOG?r1=1.4&r2=1.5 Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * Bump debhelper to 9 * debian/copyright + Update format as in Debian Policy 3.9.3 + Update copyright years * debian/control + Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 * debian/rules + Append CPPFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags, since the upstream build system doesn't honour CPPFLAGS Regards, Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120820011232.22283.64597.reportbug@supersonic
Re: RFS: radiotray (updated package)
Hi all, On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 06:46:22PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 01:17:35PM +0200, Jan Hrdina wrote: > > Hi, > > > I am looking for somebody, who would upload new version 0.6.4-0.1 > > of package "radiotray" to Debian. It is an online radio stream player for > > tray and the new version fixes lots of important bugs and adds localization > > support. > > This package is currently maintained by Elías Alejandro Año Mendoza, did > you contact him about a new upstream release? > You can also just open a wishlist bug against the package and offer > your patches there. > Yes, current upstream version 0.6.4 will be packaged as soon as posible. I'm working to switch to dh_python2. Soon good news. :) Best regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110731212323.GA2357@debianero
Re: DEP-5 and derivative work
package: jigzo-data a jigsaw game. yep, it can read. Use to create jigsaw image. Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110721164607.GA3094@debianero
Re: DEP-5 and derivative work
Hi Pabs, "cat.pzl" was an example, real file is: penguin-3x2.pzl $file penguin-3x2.pzl penguin-3x2.pzl: data Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110721160158.GA2571@debianero
DEP-5 and derivative work
Dear all, I have a question about copyright specifically about derivative works and how can I post it under DEP-5 format. For example, the upstream-author catch an image "cat.jpg", transform this image as "cat.pzl" and ONLY released as "cat.pzl". The upstream-author is aware about copyright and license for "cat.jpg" and mention about it. So, DEP-5 format: Files: puzzles/cat.pzl Copyright: ? Copyright field for image copyright owner or application upstream-author? if application upstream-author, should I mention about copyright and license image owner in comment field or where? Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110721001041.GA7430@debianero
Re: RFS: pidgin-latex.
Hi Kilian, On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 05:18:01PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > Thanks for stepping up as new maintainer for this interesting package. > yes, It was useful for me sometime ago. > I see you're including CHANGES as docs which is not required. It'll get > installed twice then and end up as both CHANGELOG and changelog.gz in > the deb. (=> Removed) > Thanks, I've forgot remove it. > Moreover your short description lacks one "h" (at wich - should be > which) and it also lacks a comment that this plugin is only a local > rendering and doesn't transmit images accross to your chat/IM-partner > who will also have to install the plugin to enjoy the full > functionality. (=> Updated) > > LaTeX.[ch] have still have the old FSF address which you may want to > tell upstream so that they can fix it. > I'll notify to upstream author about your comments. > As you've also opened your own ITP I guess it'd make sense to close that > as well for cosmetic reasons - even though they should be closed both > through the already existing link. (=> Added) > I'm agree with _makeup_ reasons. :) I'll take into account. > Apart from that, IMHO fine to be uploaded. > > Thus I've taken the above mentioned measures in () and sponsored your > package. You can find my upload at > http://people.debian.org/~kilian/pidgin-latex/ Ok, I've just download. Thanks a lot for your valuable help. Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110707172916.GA2451@debianero
RFS: pidgin-latex.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-latex". * Package name: pidgin-latex Version : 1.4.4-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Moll * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex/ * License : GPL-2 Section : net It builds these binary packages: pidgin-latex - Pidgin plugin to display LaTeX formula The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 520658 My motivation for maintaining this package is: usefull plugin to show our math formulas for pidgin. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex_1.4.4-1.dsc A guide about pidgin-latex could be found: http://www.wangtang.de/pidgin-latex/ I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110706211529.GA2401@debianero
Re: RFS: tnat64 -- IPv4 to NAT64 redirector
Hi, I am not a DD, so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But here my fast review about your package: 1. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 2. Maybe you can use debhelper version 8 under: debian/compat, debian/control 3. debian/copyright: please use DEP-5 format[0] 4. Newest version on remote site is 0.03 5. Lintian issues (lintian -iI --pedantic): W: tnat64: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtnat64-0.1 W: tnat64: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libtnat64.so.0.1 usr/lib/libtnat64.so I: tnat64: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libtnat64.so.0.1 [0] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629211156.GC2316@debianero
Re: mrim-prpl sponsorship
Hi again, debian/watch can be improved, clean initial comments and check[0] then test with: uscan --no-download --verbose [0] http://googlecode.debian.net/ Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629204830.GB2316@debianero
Re: mrim-prpl sponsorship
Hi, I am not a DD, and so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But here my fast review about your package: 1. debian/changelog, seems it first Debian release?. just include a first release (no other version that no appear officially under Debian) also please read[0] to improve your entries. 2. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 3. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debian/compat, debian/control 4. debian/copyright: please use DEP-5 format[1] 5. debian/rules: clean the initial comment. why, mkdir -p $(CURDIR)/debian/mrim-prpl/usr/lib/purple-2 ? it seems be enough with debian/dirs content (please check out) 7. it stops building: I: Copying back the cached apt archive contents I: Copying source file I: copying [mrim-prpl_0.1.28~rc1-1.dsc] I: copying [./mrim-prpl_0.1.28~rc1.orig.tar.gz] I: copying [./mrim-prpl_0.1.28~rc1-1.debian.tar.gz] I: copying [./SIGNATURE-] cp: cannot stat `./SIGNATURE-': No such file or directory [0] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-changelog [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629203754.GA2316@debianero
Re: RFS: winefish
Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:51:14PM -0500, Ruben Molina wrote: > I'm not a DD, but I had done a short review of your package... Also me, here my fast review about your package only to add: > > You need to work in your debian/copyright, because the package's license > is GPL-2+, and not just GPL, and you are missing lots of entries, e.g.: > There are many files © by Olivier Sessink, Eugene Morenko, Chris Mazuc, > Oskar Swida, Pablo De Napoli, or the Winefish Development Team ... > You should probably take a look at: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ > > Also, you should clean your debian/rules, all those commented lines can > be safely removed, and you can probably use some debhelper's tiny rules > here... Please take a look at /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/ 1. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 2. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debian/compat, debian/control 3. fail building: /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 inline_images/winefish_icon1.png /usr/share/pixmaps/winefish-icon.png /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/share/pixmaps/winefish-icon.png': Permission denied make[1]: *** [install-icon] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/winefish-1.3.3' make: *** [install] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629175733.GE2308@debianero
Re: RFS: mesk
Hi, I am not a DD, and so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But here my fast review about your package: 1. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 2. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat, debian/control 3. debian/copyright: please use DEP-5 format[0] 4. debian/rules: clean the initial comment 5. your patch could be under DEP-3 format[1] 6. Lintian issues: - extended-description-is-probably-too-short - empty-binary-package [0] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629174342.GD2308@debianero
Re: RFS: Rodent Beta filemanager
Hi, I am not a DD, and so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But here my fast review about your package: 1. debian/changelog: no close some bug, ITP or ITA? So clean: "(Closes: #) " and your initial Debian release should be 4.6.2-1 no just 4.6.2 2. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat , debian/control 3. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 4. Vcs-SVN, and Vcs-browser should be just for Debian packaging work no upstream works. 5. debian/copyright: please use DEP-5 format[0] and complete the fields please. 6. debian/rules: clean verbose comment 7. your files: README.Debian, README.source, rodent-doc.docs, rodent-doc.install seems useless, please check if really they should be there. [0] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629172059.GC2308@debianero
Re: RFS: phing (another try)
Hi, I'm not DD. I'm sorrry. This my fast review about your package: 1. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat , debian/control 2. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 3. no necessary quilt as build-dependency[0] 4. under debian/copyright specify license version, LGPL-3 (i.e) 5. for your patch, use DEP-3 format [1] cleaning "#'s" 6. clean the coments from debian/rules, uhm... seems it could be just (please try it): dh $@ [0] http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0#Does_a_3.0_.28quilt.29_source_package_need_to_build-depend_on_quilt.3F [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629170300.GB2308@debianero
Re: RFS: lebiniou, lebiniou-data
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 05:54:49PM +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
> debian/control
> --
>
> - The VCS-* fields should be relative to the debian packaging, not
> the upstream repository. From what I've seen, this source package
> has been generated from the upstream "debian/" subdirectory. This
> is misleading because you can't easily export a tarball and use it
> as a .orig file.
>
> As you are the upstream author, I suggest that you use a single
> source package to build these two binary packages (one .dsc, two
> .debs). That should ease maintenance, including the following
> point.
>
> - The dependency against lebiniou-data is not versioned. That means
> that lebiniou is meant to be usable with any version of
> lebiniou-data. In such a case I think you need to specify exactly
> one version. With a single source package, you could depend on
> lebinou-data (= ${source:Version}).
>
Also, debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat , debian/control
Regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629164011.GA2308@debianero
Re: RFS: pidgin-latex
2011/6/25 Michael Tautschnig > > The source tree contains files ._LaTeX.c and ._LaTeX.h; it would be nice if > upstream could clean up this mess first. If this were done, the package > would be > fine from my POV. > > Ok, I'll notify him about this and we'll try to fix. Thanks. Regards, -- Elías Alejandro
Re: RFS: gpick (updated package)
Hi Michael, Thanks a lot for your valuable help. Best regards, -- Elías Alejandro 2011/6/25 Michael Tautschnig > Hi Elías, > > [...] > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick > > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick/gpick_0.2.4-1.dsc > > > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > > [...] > > I've reviewed the changes, built the package, and uploaded it. > > NB: I've taken the one from mentors.d.n, hope that was in line with the one > in > collab-maint. > > Thanks a lot for your work, > Michael > >
RFS: gpick (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.4-1 of my package "gpick". It builds these binary packages: gpick - advanced GTK+ color picker The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 622964 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick/gpick_0.2.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Also, gpick is under collab-maint: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/gpick.git;a=summary Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110616164826.GA4323@debianero
RFS: pidgin-latex
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-latex". * Package name: pidgin-latex Version : 1.4.4-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Moll * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex/ * License : GPL-2 Section : net It builds these binary packages: pidgin-latex - Pidgin plugin to display LaTeX formula The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 520658 My motivation for maintaining this package is: usefull plugin to show our math formulas for pidgin The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex_1.4.4-1.dsc A guide about pidgin-latex could be found: http://www.wangtang.de/pidgin-latex/ I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro
Re: Licensing question
Ok, thanks a lot for your answers. Best regards, -- Elías -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110520192329.GA10215@debianero
Re: Licensing question
Hi, First, thanks for your answer. On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 06:38:54PM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote: > If you link against code which links against OpenSSL, IANAL, but I think > you also need to have the exception in your own code. > So you mean add this exception in debian/copyright? according[1] point 28: "In addition, as a special exception, the Free Software Foundation gives permission to link the code of its release of Wget with the OpenSSL project's "OpenSSL" library (or with modified versions of it that use the same license as the "OpenSSL" library), and distribute the linked executables. You must obey the GNU General Public License in all respects for all of the code used other than "OpenSSL". If you modify this file, you may extend this exception to your version of the file, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from your version" [1] http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html Best regards, -- Elías -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110518231817.GA3492@debianero
Licensing question
Hi all, I want your advices about a package that requires in its new upstream release, as build dependency: libcurl4-openssl-dev Previous releases was built with libcurl4-gnutls-dev and packaging under GPL-3. So, If there any licence issue if it is compiled with libcurl4-openssl-dev instead of libcurl4-gnutls-dev and packaging under GPL-3? I was reading [1], point 28 but I'm not sure because it isn't directly the OpenSSL library. [1] http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html Thanks, -- Elías -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110518181555.GB3564@debianero
env[HOME] issues
Hi all,
Few days ago my package was uploaded however it didn't builds properly
with some architectures like PPC its building log is [1] basically says:
Use of uninitialized value $ENV{"HOME"} in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/Source/Package.pm line 258.
It worked fine with previous version[2].
I was building with qemu ppc environment (sid) and it builds fine.
Do you know something about this? probably some python problem or some else?
Thanks in advance.
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=radiotray&ver=0.6.3-1&arch=powerpc&stamp=1301635623&file=log
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=radiotray&arch=powerpc
Regards,
--
Elías Alejandro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110412020409.GA3562@debianero
RFS: pidgin-latex
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-latex". * Package name: pidgin-latex Version : 1.4.4-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Moll * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex/ * License : GPL-2 Section : net It builds these binary packages: pidgin-latex - Pidgin plugin to display LaTeX formula The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 520658 My motivation for maintaining this package is: usefull plugin to show our math formulas for pidgin The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex_1.4.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinCCTKOLU5hJyXHbO=wwsyo+qpgji2nrpt+m...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: gpick (2nd try)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gpick". * Package name: gpick Version : 0.2.3-1 Upstream Author : Albertas Vyšniauskas * URL : http://code.google.com/p/gpick/ * License : BSD-3 Section : graphics It builds these binary packages: gpick - advanced GTK+ color picker The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 579617 My motivation for maintaining this package is: provide a simple tool to get colors, util for designs activities. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick/gpick_0.2.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110313054514.GA5566@debianero
RFS: pidgin-latex
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-latex". * Package name: pidgin-latex Version : 1.4.4-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Moll * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex/ * License : GPL-2 Section : net It builds these binary packages: pidgin-latex - Pidgin plugin to display LaTeX formula The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 520658 My motivation for maintaining this package is: usefull plugin to show our math formulas for pidgin The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex_1.4.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=xbp_mnutzyu0diaz1h+cte48gsnkgatk7x...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: pidgin-latex
Hi all, recently a new upstream version was released (<24 hours) I've just packaged. > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-latex". > > * Package name : pidgin-latex > Version : 1.4.3-1 > Upstream Author : Benjamin Moll > * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex/ > * License : GPL-2 > Section : net > > It builds these binary packages: > pidgin-latex - Pidgin plugin to display LaTeX formula > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 520658, 609723 > > My motivation for maintaining this package is: usefull > plugin to show our math formulas for pidgin > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex_1.4.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=Me_WfuPdWX=ueb9i4dq6u-vku8qsnucojh...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: pidgin-latex
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-latex". * Package name: pidgin-latex Version : 1.4.3-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Moll * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex/ * License : GPL-2 Section : net It builds these binary packages: pidgin-latex - Pidgin plugin to display LaTeX formula The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 520658, 609723 My motivation for maintaining this package is: usefull plugin to show our math formulas for pidgin The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-latex/pidgin-latex_1.4.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktiklwblqqswvikozfde4+fck-gir9is81i5ej...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: fdclone (updated package)
> I see. If upstream changes the configuration file format often you may > want to look at implementing a Config::Model backend for it so that > you can safely upgrade users configuration files automatically. > > Also, the README.Debian contains bunch of unneeded detail. A lot of > the listed changes are what Debian users would expect because of > Debian policy. I would remove points 1-3, 5-6, 8, 10. > ok, I'll take into account. >>> Minor nitpick, the -r option means recursively remove a directory. >>> Since you are removing a file, no need to use it :) >> >> ok. you win. :) > > It wasn't my intention to win, just to educate you a little ;) > hehe, thanks! :) >>> In comparison to yours, it doesn't mention the following irrelevant detail: >> >> About the changelog, I've followed your advice and add a item. Finally: > > Cool > > Please send the patches upstream too. > > Also, looking at the output of `whohas fdclone`, I found some more > patches you may want to let upstream know about: > > http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/utils/fdclone.patch?revision=HEAD&view=markup > http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/sysutils/FDclone/files/patch-Makefile.in.diff ok, I'll review them and send to the upstream what think about them. Thanks! Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimueke=0hjzq2fa7h1tkpqz9hxaqay2kbddu...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: fdclone (updated package)
> Thanks a lot for providing further information - I had noticed the changes in > debian/rules, but wasn't aware of their relation to the changelog entry. > Package > built and uploaded. > > Thanks a lot for your contribution, > Michael > > PS.: pabs, thanks a lot for reviewing this package. > Thanks a lot Michael. Thanks guys! Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=if+ekydmrtikobiz4h_yvdq0mr2opvjp1j...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: fdclone (updated package)
Hi Michael, > I just looked at your package and wonder what you mean by "Fixed some troubles > with translation table" - I couldn't figure out which change in the source > package corresponds to this "fix"? Could you briefly describe, what has been > changed concerning the "translation table"? I've changed debian/rules (the first 2 lines). to compile properly with pbuilder. (but, if you compile natively in your box it works fine.) fdclone works with a translation table (english/japanese) to use according the system to show some messages. (i.e) If you run fdclone (fd), and press key ESC or letter q.. just appears [Y/N] .. it should be: Quit from FD? [Y/N] Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=zg+pp7pjf7ohh7buetwnmuq61n6n5z59dm...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: gpick
Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gpick". * Package name: gpick Version : 0.2.3-1 Upstream Author : Albertas Vyšniauskas * URL : http://code.google.com/p/gpick/ * License : BSD Section : graphics It builds these binary packages: gpick - advanced GTK+ color picker The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 579617 My motivation for maintaining this package is: provide a simple tool to get colors, util for design works. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick/gpick_0.2.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimjjugjc6ypkyypq263efnpg4rwywre58jdc...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: fdclone (updated package)
> Ok, that still doesn't tell me why an empty file needs to exist. > > Since it is empty, surely it has no effect on the package. > Exactly, no bad effect on the package. It allows to the user make its own configuration to avoid edit /etc/fdclone/fd2rc itself for smooth upgrade. (README.Debian) But principally, I want to re-upload to Debian because I've found a trouble with the translation table, doesn't appear letters so the popcon are decreasing :( this version solved this. > Minor nitpick, the -r option means recursively remove a directory. > Since you are removing a file, no need to use it :) > ok. you win. :) > In comparison to yours, it doesn't mention the following irrelevant detail: About the changelog, I've followed your advice and add a item. Finally: I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. :) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fdclone/ Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinyp7wp6qnzrtworo_13xnd1wbrsyo3g9o9v...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: fdclone (updated package)
Hi, First thanks for you review. > Firstly, why does the package need an empty file at > /etc/fdclone/fd2rc.siteconfig? > This version is a fdclone customization for Debian come since 2002 and it was made by a DD. > Secondly, the postrm should only remove that file, not all of /etc/fdclone/. > Done. > Thirdly, your changelog entries are not particularly useful to users, > you might want to read devref 6.3: > I've tried to improve it. be more specific. Once again: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fdclone/ Kind Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim7ywul+dsv0ley-dxvoqmxjewfykz+tmp1h...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: fdclone (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.00j-2 of my package "fdclone". It builds these binary packages: fdclone- console-base lightweight file manager The package appears to be pedantic lintian clean. And fix piuparts issue. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fdclone - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fdclone/fdclone_3.00j-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim=cylkab0c7+hknpyaue-aqrjyevylgp2r-...@mail.gmail.com
Re: piuparts and bug #594964
Hi Holger, On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Dienstag, 30. November 2010, Holger Levsen wrote: >> The svn trunk version of piuparts is fixed and doesnt show this error. > > I've started to prepare an upload to sid now... there should be at least one > in 2010 ;-) > ok, that sounds great!. Thanks. Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimnfvzytx4=pfj6mq8y_+zcehntjtsfrsfyo...@mail.gmail.com
piuparts and bug #594964
Hi all, I was testing my package with piuparts and in the end gets stuck and said (seems bug #594964): 0m25.9s DEBUG: No broken symlinks as far as we can find. 0m27.0s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have been modified: /var/log/apt/history.log not owned 0m27.0s ERROR: FAIL: Installation, upgrade and purging tests. 0m27.0s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/tmp/tmp7C7Jaw', 'umount', '/proc'] 0m27.0s DEBUG: Command ok: ['chroot', '/tmp/tmp7C7Jaw', 'umount', '/proc'] 0m27.3s DEBUG: Removed directory tree at /tmp/tmp7C7Jaw Should I do ignore it? or How do I know if my package works fine? Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinajszzxc5kpnvnlut9mtn_z=qiqvxpub1rg...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: fdclone (updated package)
Hi, On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:29:47PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Well, not completely: > > I: fdclone: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man1/fd.1.gz informations > information > (and 8 more of those) > > Please use lintian -iI --pedantic next time; but that's a pretty minor note, Ok. I'll take into account in next times. > hence built&uploaded. Thank you so much! Best regards, -- Elías -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101021212101.ga2...@debianero
RFS: fdclone (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.00j-1 of my package "fdclone". It builds these binary packages: fdclone- console-base lightweight file manager The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 494602 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fdclone - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fdclone/fdclone_3.00j-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101019074950.ga4...@debianero
Re: RFS: gpick
Hi, On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:11:30AM +0200, Pietro Battiston wrote: > I can't say I have made a deep review - just compiled, tried the app and > looked at some files. But I must say the app itself is very practical > for any web (and not only web) designer. > > I would anyway not be able be sponsor since I'm not a DD, but I > encourage DDs to not be fooled by the word "simple" in the motivation > above, neither by the intrinsec simplicity that the "color picker" > expression may suggest. This is in my opinion a well written and useful > tool, worth a place in Debian. > First of all, thanks for your words are truly motivating. The good news is that gpick is pending[0] and very soon will be on Debian :) also I want to thanks to ctaylor. > My 2 cents. > > > @Elías: maybe the language and graphic libraries adopted don't deserve a > place in the description. > Instead, if I was in you I would ensure that the expression "color > theme" appears in it, since that's a fundamental feature of the > software. > Moreover, there is a redundant space in the second line. > Finally, I think the following applies to the package: > > http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0#Doesa3.0.28quilt.29sourcepackageneedtobuild-dependonquilt.3F Thanks to take your time to review gpick. I wanted keep the description like its web and make it sound more familiar. About your others points, I will take them into account. [0]http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/gpick_0.2.2-1.html Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100907061558.ga2...@debianero
RFS: fdclone (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.00i-1 of my package "fdclone". It builds these binary packages: fdclone- console-base lightweight file manager The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 494602 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fdclone - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fdclone/fdclone_3.00i-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=pu_dknitzbon9wrf5--tq9kpuvwbq6+2oj...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: fdclone (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.00i-1 of my package "fdclone". It builds these binary packages: fdclone- console-base lightweight file manager The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 494602 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fdclone - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fdclone/fdclone_3.00i-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinzuvadzbv_n-7=uhkov8e1twbxzj4tccsvu...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: gpick
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gpick". * Package name: gpick Version : 0.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Albertas Vyšniauskas * URL : http://code.google.com/p/gpick/ * License : BSD Section : graphics It builds these binary packages: gpick - advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 579617 My motivation for maintaining this package is: provide a simple tool to get colors, util for design works. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick/gpick_0.2.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinazjma3cw=qzmrh_jka0i7-9acvaa7vqjfr...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: gpick
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gpick". * Package name: gpick Version : 0.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Albertas Vyšniauskas * URL : http://code.google.com/p/gpick/ * License : BSD Section : graphics It builds these binary packages: gpick - advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 579617 My motivation for maintaining this package is: provide a simple tool to get colors, util for work design. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpick/gpick_0.2.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimkiiqegxofljgpmusm09sya6_zusz-x9yrd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: question about debian/watch
> Unrelated to the problem you're reporting, but a minor point: Your regex > could be tighter (it's best to be as specific as feasible in a regex). > I suggest: > > http://sf.net/radiotray/radiotray-(.+)\.tar\.gz > Ok, thanks people. -- Elías -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin59lg_piozml5-cglgtwtluujkqhivslike...@mail.gmail.com
question about debian/watch
Hi all, I'm working with the new radiotray's version (http://sourceforge.net/projects/radiotray/files/) , it's new version 0.6, however doing: uscan --verbose it just show me: -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: http://sf.net/radiotray/radiotray-(.*)\.tar\.gz -- Found the following matching hrefs: radiotray-0.5.tar.gz radiotray-0.5.1.tar.gz radiotray-0.4.tar.gz radiotray-0.3.tar.gz radiotray-0.2.tar.gz radiotray-0.1.tar.gz Newest version on remote site is 0.5.1, local version is 0.6 => remote site does not even have current version -- Scan finishedhttp://sf.net/radiotray/radiotray-(.*)\.tar\.gz as you see, my debian/watch is: version=3 http://sf.net/radiotray/radiotray-(.*)\.tar\.gz I don't understand, because it worked fine with the 0.5.1 version. Please anybody know about this or should be my debian/watch different or I'm wrong? One question more please, why in http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/radiotray/ appear version, just until 0.5.1? maybe is it the answer? Regards, -- Elías -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikte3ys3zsjbi9aa29sx3lfj_i158_t0udsc...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: radiotray
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radiotray". * Package name: radiotray Version : 0.5.1-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Ribeiro * URL : http://radiotray.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL >=1 Section : sound It builds these binary packages: radiotray - online radio streaming player The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 579182 My motivation for maintaining this package is: I think that is a cool aplication for Debian to listen radios online. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radiotray - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radiotray/radiotray_0.5.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinblsrcdd1q5lzijaxbipfo2ctjuhqj4mdzs...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: radiotray
> Hi, > >> radiotray - online radio streaming player that runs on a Linux system tray > > I'm probably not in a good position to go and do some nitpicking on other > peoples package description but 'a Linux system tray' sounds a bit odd. > At least Linux is still the name of a kernel and not the name of desktop > enviroment which indeed might have system tray where this application could > dock. > Thanks Sven, Henceforth, I will consider it Regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/n2j91a316a41005060735i1f76bb37t3842235f7283e...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: radiotray
> Checked and uploaded. > > regards > fEnIo Thank you so much ;) -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/m2s91a316a41005060721ibb90b126ybf8f948e2d03d...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: radiotray
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radiotray". * Package name: radiotray Version : 0.5.1-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Ribeiro * URL : http://radiotray.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-1 Section : sound It builds these binary packages: radiotray - online radio streaming player that runs on a Linux system tray The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 579182 My motivation for maintaining this package is: I think it is a awesome aplication for Debian. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radiotray - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radiotray/radiotray_0.5.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/t2g91a316a41005060109h9886c0aeodaf0e49290d0d...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: wixi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wixi". * Package name: wixi Version : 1.10-1 Upstream Author : Kess Remmelzwaal * URL : http://wixi.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2 Section : utils It builds these binary packages: wixi - multi-platform wiki application for the desktop It is written in python/wxpython and uses txt2tags to generate text to many other formats. The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 457993 My motivation for maintaining this package is: provide support to anyone that require a personal wiki. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wixi - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wixi/wixi_1.10-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba9a5e8.6060...@gmail.com
RFS: bygfoot (updated package.)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3.2-1 of my package "bygfoot". It builds these binary packages: bygfoot- football (a.k.a soccer) management game bygfoot-data - data of football (a.k.a soccer) management game The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 297167, 409865, 432131, 481319, 560848 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot/bygfoot_2.3.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/91a316a41002241826u31e8133at5c30f154fa137...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: bygfoot (Updated package)
Hi folks, Please could somebody check once again, - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot/bygfoot_2.3.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b7cfada.5040...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: bygfoot (Updated package)
> Oh, I forgot to say one thing. If possible, the stored game data > should be arch-independent (that means independent of the endianess > and word size of the processor), so that if you take your $HOME from > your PowerPC computer to your AMD64 one, or if your $HOME is shared > among different computers, things still work. > Ok, Miriam thanks again :) the game itself handle this stuff, once is loaded (create a new hidden directory in the user's home). But if that is posible I'll try. -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/91a316a41002171346n1202c40cx5960349739c8b...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: bygfoot (Updated package)
Paul, I choose this option: >Version numbers in the file/directory names. I'll create a patch to fix it. Your personal favourite seems that the upstream author couldn't fix it (this isn't a excuse) but I think that is quick and easy. Also I'll follow the XDG basedir. > Also, users expect not to lose previous saved games when upgrading to > a newer version of the game, so we should do as much as possiible to > avoid that. It is really annoying to be playing a game and lose your > saved data after an upgrade. Players would have the whole right to > complain about it. I would. Miriam, I'm totally agree with you. Thank you so much. -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/91a316a41002171002r34e4f105kdf7c50f9d099e...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: bygfoot (Updated package)
Hi Christoph, > At least I don't consider this package as long as the preinstal > does a find over all home directories. Messing in user's home > directories isn't nice and find can take *really* *long*. I'm agree with the "isn't nice", but how can I keep the user savegames that belong previous to versions, or simply delete it?. Each versions create a hidden directory named .bygfoot in the /home for savegames, but each version can't load this savegames, just if this savegame belong to the same version. I've tried with the script preinst, keep the previous savegame and then the new version will create its own .byfoot. Thanks for taking time. -- Elías Alejandro. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/91a316a41002170736g2dea9197l189e01b935523...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: bygfoot (Updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3.2-1 of my package "bygfoot". It builds these binary packages: bygfoot- football (a.k.a soccer) management game bygfoot-data - data of football (a.k.a soccer) management game The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 297167, 409865, 432131, 481319, 560848 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot/bygfoot_2.3.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/91a316a41002161101m292f134bs3432dbab168b5...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: bygfoot (updated package).
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3.2-1 of my package "bygfoot". It builds these binary packages: bygfoot- football (a.k.a soccer) management game bygfoot-data - data of football (a.k.a soccer) management game The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 297167, 409865, 432131, 481319, 560848 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot/bygfoot_2.3.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: bygfoot (updated package)
Hi Christoph,
First all, thank you :)
Sorry I have not time, but recently I was reading your e-mail.
> Hm what do you think of the following lintian warnings?
>
I think it depends the lintian's version, recently updated and said
this, but before all was fine.
> W: bygfoot: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script preinst:5 '${MIARRAY[0]}'
> W: bygfoot: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script preinst:7 '${MIARRAY[*]}'
>
> They look rather valid to me.
I'm agree, I don't know what is the trouble, the Posix Shell uses that way.
maybe the next version corrects this, However everything seems work
fine (the game).
--
Elías
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
