Bug#799092: RFS: haxe/1:3.2.0+dfsg-1

[Gabriele Giacone]

Hi Vincent, hi Andy,

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Vincent Bernat  wrote:
>  ❦ 16 septembre 2015 03:46 +0800, Andy Li  :
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haxe".
>> I'm a member of the Haxe Foundation. I would like to maintain the
>> package in the long term to improve haxe's debian support.
> [...[
>> * Adopt package.
>> + Set maintainer to myself.
>
> Hi Andy!
>
> The package isn't flagged up for adoption. Did you discuss with the
> current maintainers? The package has recently been adopted by the Debian
> Flash Team. I am sure they would welcome your help and accept that you
> maintain the package, but please, ask them.

I'm ok with haxe adoption.
At that time I adopted it just to fix rc bugs and avoid its removal,
gnash testsuite depends on it.
At the moment, no time to maintain it nor to review adopters' packaging.
Just filed RFA bug https://bugs.debian.org/799151

Thanks for your time
-- 
G..e

Bug#785737: RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:26:00AM +, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
 Hello

Hi, thanks for reviewing.
 
 Gabriele Giacone wrote:
   haxe (1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
  
* Adopt as Debian Flash Team.
  + Set maintainer to Debian Flash team, add myself to uploaders.
* Set Vcs-* fields to updated collab-maint git repo.
* Replace jquery-latest.min.js and swfobject.js with symlinks to system 
  ones.
  + Remove sourceless files from upstream tarball (Closes: #736596).
  + Add libjs-jquery and libjs-swfobject runtime dependencies.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes).
 
 You added a +dfsg suffix. Good.
 
 However, lintian is complaining about the +dfsg :
 debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version.

Fixed, pushed, re-uploaded.
 
 You should update the watch file to match your change.
 Please also look at repacksuffix in uscan(1).
 
 When removing some non-free files, you should provide a get-orig-source
 target in your rules file. The easiest way to remove files is to use a
 DEP5 formated copyright file and to have a line Files-Excluded:. See
 uscan(1).

Yeah I've just did it few days ago for ming, convenient.
 
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-flash/ming.git/commit/?id=f7531971a4dd6f37520bc3fe66421e9bea8ed396

In this case, I've changed packaging as little as possible: no new
upstream release, no format 1.0 copyright, no Files-Excluded.
Mainly just to fix RC bug #736596.

 Everything else is ok to me.
 
 It's nice that package finally fond an adoption team. :)

Well, unfortunately lately team is just me, also without upload rights.
Haxe is not flash specific software but gnash testsuite depends on it.
No problem about moving it to collab-maint if preferred.

Thanks,
-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150522111520.GA29662@jessie01

Bug#785737: RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:05:16PM +, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
 Cool, but I think your are missing my point.
 
 Because you had to remove two files from the original tar ball, both
 d/rules get-orig-source and uscan now returns an incorrect source
 tarball, I mean it does contain the files you removed. I'm afraid I'm
 uncomfortable with that.
 
 Option 1/
 Switch to dep5 with Files-Excluded:, remove the get-orig-source target.
 
 Option 2/
 Fix the get-orig-source target to remove the files you don't want from
 the orig.tar.xz. Right now, it does not do that.
 There are many example in existing packages:
 https://codesearch.debian.net/results/repack.sh/page_0
 Then, the watch file should contain the extra (2nd and) 3rd parameters
 to call your repack script. See uscan(1).
 
 Option 3/
 At the very least, if you absolutely don't want options 1 or 2, it would
 be nice to document that in a README.source file. See policy 4.14, item
 4. I would remove the misleading get-orig-source target then.
 
 Or am I missing something?

Yeah, forgot to make files removal automatic somehow.
Switched to dep5. Pushed, reuploaded.

-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150522145359.GA27927@jessie01

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:03:48PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
 On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:41:02PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
 
  [1] https://github.com/libming/libming/issues/42
 
  I've just updated the list few hours ago, just 2 missing contributors, 4
  commits.  Not sure that commits in question are legally significant and
  can block relicensing.  Opinions? [also CC'ing d-legal]
 
 IANAL, so my opinion doesn't actually matter. :)
 
 If you want an authoritative yes/no regarding whether this is legally
 acceptable or not, debian-legal is the wrong place; you should be
 asking the ftpmasters directly instead.
 
 I don't actually know anything about ming (and the Debian ming
 packages); are php_ext/ming.{c,h} actually used to build the binary
 packages? Can they be removed just like java_ext?

They can, they are both extensions but php one is packaged as php5-ming
(java_ext is not) and its popcon is around 2000.

 https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=ming

[ CC'ing ftpmaster@d.o ]

Hi ftpmasters,

question is: Ming PHP extension (see #752629) has been relicensed in
both upstream git repo and latest tarballs released few days ago. Should
Debian be concerned about upstream contributors who haven't expressed
any agreement (yet) with license change?

Thanks for your time.
-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150519103311.GA13198@jessie01

Bug#785514: closed by Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org (closing RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC])

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:30:10PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:27:40 +
 From: Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org
 To: 785514-d...@bugs.debian.org
 Subject: closing RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]
 
 Package ming has been removed from mentors.

Re-uploaded without non-redistributable files.

 DSC: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/ming/ming_0.4.7+dfsg-1.dsc
 Git repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-flash/ming.git

  Changes since the last upload:

 ming (1:0.4.7+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium

   * New upstream release.
 + Change php bindings license from PHP to LGPL-2.1+ (Closes: #752629).
   * Convert d/copyright to format 1.0.
 + Update php extension license.
   * Remove non-redistributable files under java_ext/, see d/README.source.
 + Fix d/watch, add Files-Excluded to d/copyright, add
   get-orig-source target.
   * Remove 04_bison 05_hurd 06_ungif patches, applied upstream.
   * Switch to 3.0 (quilt) format.
   * Remove non debian/ changes.
   * Add Vcs-* fields.
   * B-D on debhelper = 9.
   * Switch to Debian Flash Team maintainship. Add myself to Uploaders.
   * Enable hardening.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes).

Thanks,
-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150520002257.GA623@jessie01

Bug#785737: RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package haxe

 * Package name: haxe
   Version : 1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1
   Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse ncannasse at motion-twin.com
 * URL : http://haxe.org
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : devel

  It builds those binary packages:

haxe  - Web-oriented universal programming language

  DSC: 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/haxe/haxe_3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1.dsc
  Git repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/haxe.git

  Changes since the last upload:

 haxe (1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Adopt as Debian Flash Team.
+ Set maintainer to Debian Flash team, add myself to uploaders.
  * Set Vcs-* fields to updated collab-maint git repo.
  * Replace jquery-latest.min.js and swfobject.js with symlinks to system ones.
+ Remove sourceless files from upstream tarball (Closes: #736596).
+ Add libjs-jquery and libjs-swfobject runtime dependencies.
  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes).

Thanks,
-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150519180445.GA16362@jessie01

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:41:02PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
 Hi Gabriele,

Hi Vince,

 About the re-licensing of php_ext/ming.c and php_ext/php_ming.h, does
 the relevant Github issue [1] mean that the re-licensing wasn't
 actually ACK-ed by all the contributors of these files? This sounds
 like this might be a blocker?

 [1] https://github.com/libming/libming/issues/42

I've just updated the list few hours ago, just 2 missing contributors, 4
commits.  Not sure that commits in question are legally significant and
can block relicensing.  Opinions? [also CC'ing d-legal]

 debian/copyright:
 - various files in e.g. src/blocks/ are also copyrighted by Klaus
 Rechert, not just the specific stanzas you've listed in d/copyright
 - perl_ext/SWF/BinaryData.pm:# Copyright (c) 2009 Albrecht Kleine
 - a small portion of ch/pkgcreate.ch is Copyright 2005
 SoftIntegration, Inc., public domain
 - java_ext/* doesn't seem to be licensed under LGPL-2.1+ as claimed by
 d/copyright, but under this license instead:

Thanks for spending time on d/copyright.
Just fixed what you pointed out in git.

 - debian/ming-fonts-{dejavu,opensymbol}.copyright not converted to
 DEP-5; that's fine, although it's worth pointing out that
 ming-fonts-opensymbol.copyright has an unversioned symlink to the
 LGPL.

Now I know that even binaries can have their own copyright file, which
replaces global one (always good?). Fixed in git.
 
 There's a variety of other things that can be done to
 improve/modernize the package, e.g. DEP-3 patch headers, conversion of
 d/rules to dh shorthand, etc., but I suppose you want to tackle the
 copyright/licensing issues as that's what got the package removed from
 testing in the first place?

Exactly.

-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150518235143.GA15854@jessie01

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:14:23PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
 On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
 
  - java_ext/* doesn't seem to be licensed under LGPL-2.1+ as claimed by
  d/copyright, but under this license instead:
 
  This software is copyright 2001 E-Publishing Group Inc.  Permission is 
  granted
  to use the code and/or make changes to the code provided that the original
  copyright and author attribution is included in each file.
 
  The license does not make any warranty of liability, merchantability, or
  fitness for any specific purpose.
 
  Please contact the author jsh...@e-shuppan.com if you have any questions
  about the license or the software.
 
 That appears to be a non-free license as there is no clause allowing
 distribution? Please remove ming from mentors until this is clarified
 as we don't have a license to distribute it.

Neither a clause prohibiting it. Does it really make it non-free? Any
reference?

BTW getting rid of java extension would not be a problem, currently not even
packaged.

-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150519000400.GB15854@jessie01

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
 On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
 BTW getting rid of java extension would not be a problem

 Great, please do ASAP as you have made mentors.d.n violate the law.

I guess unstable has been violating it since years then. And
snapshot.d.o will keep doing it even after next upload. Removed.

-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CABcaWC3dZHooP5vyEJOM4T_fRyExvf4BY=kyojs2e9ettiz...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package ming

 * Package name: ming
   Version : 1:0.4.7-1
   Upstream Author : The Ming Development Team
 * URL : http://www.libming.org/
 * License : LGPL-2.1
   Section : libs

  It builds those binary packages:

   libming1   - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files
   libming-dev - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files (development files)
   libming-util - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files - Utilities
   libswf-perl - Ming (SWF) module for Perl
   ming-fonts-dejavu - Ming format DejaVue Fonts
   ming-fonts-opensymbol - Ming format Opensymbol Fonts
   php5-ming  - Ming module for php5
   python-ming - Ming (SWF) module for Python

  DSC: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/ming/ming_0.4.7-1.dsc
  Git repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-flash/ming.git

  Changes since the last upload:

 ming (1:0.4.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium

   * New upstream release.
 + Change php bindings license from PHP to LGPL-2.1+ (Closes: #752629).
   * Convert d/copyright to format 1.0.
 + Update php extension license.
   * Remove 04_bison 05_hurd 06_ungif patches, applied upstream.
   * Switch to 3.0 (quilt) format.
   * Remove non debian/ changes.
   * Add Vcs-* fields.
   * B-D on debhelper = 9.
   * Switch to Debian Flash Team maintainship. Add myself to Uploaders.
   * Enable hardening.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes).

 Current maintainer Stuart Anderson (CC'ed along with pkg-flash team)
 about team maintenance:

  https://bugs.debian.org/752716#67

Thanks,
-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150517104310.GA29947@jessie01

Bug#784831: RFS: gnash/0.8.11~git20150419-1~bpo8+1 [1st upload to bpo]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

as suggested by #772843, looking for a sponsor for the first upload to
jessie-backports. jessie doesn't ship gnash.

Uploaded to mentors with -v0.8.11~git20140319+dfsg-1~bpo70+1 (last
wheezy-backports upload):

 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnash/gnash_0.8.11~git20150419-1~bpo8+1.dsc

Changes since then:

 gnash (0.8.11~git20150419-1~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for jessie-backports.
   * Remove haxe and ming build deps, not available in jessie.
 .
 gnash (0.8.11~git20150419-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream snapshot.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes).
   * Fix alternative system on ubuntu (LP: #1266088).
 .
 gnash (0.8.11~git20140708-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix libgnashsound.so install, FTBFS on hurd.
 .
 gnash (0.8.11~git20140708-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Install libgnashsound.so on !hurd-any.
   * Borrow #733890 patch to try to fix build on powerpc* and mips*.
   * docs: install missing rtmp.png image.
 .
 gnash (0.8.11~git20140708-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream snapshot.
 + Remove libboost-thread-dev B-D, switched to std::thread.
   * Add --enable-sound=none configure option on hurd.
   * Make testsuite failures more verbose.
   * Switch from xulrunner-dev to npapi-sdk-dev B-D (Closes: #752836).
 .
 gnash (0.8.11~git20140419-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream snapshot.
   * Enable testsuite.
 + Do not remove sourceless SWF files from upstream tarball anymore,
   override lintian tag.
 + Add csound, haxe, libming-dev, libming-util, mtasc, swfmill,
   swftools as B-D.

Thanks,
-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150509104651.GA847@jessie01

Bug#740032: sweethome3d-textures_1.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Gabriele Giacone]

[CC'ing bug just to make anyone else interested know]

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote:
 Hi Gabriele,

 Sorry but I haven't interest in sponsoring your package(s) more.

 Regards,

 Eriberto

If/whenever I change my mind about splitting it, you'll be the first I prod.
Thanks for your time.

-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cabcawc17q9+phqthsavdm4syrtd-o4lkdvvhz10zgu7iwn-...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#740032: sweethome3d-textures_1.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
 Hi,

 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com writes:
 On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Debian FTP Masters
 ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:

 ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed

 Hello ftpmasters,
 I switched to a stronger key few days ago.
 See
 https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/keyring/keyring.git/commit/?id=cdcd6ca706360329b2252bc8ec11f32b7424da11

 New key, so next uploads seen as NEW uploads?
 Or given [0] lists old fingerprint, should i re-ask to all DDs who
 have granted me DM rights in the past to do that again? I thought
 (hoped) it would have been automatic.

 It's not (yet) automated, but:

 +---
 |  Action: dm-migrate
 |  From: B5BCBDDE7CA813D4F6A3D135A7771D09B55C9C2B
 |  To: 5BD0 67A2 9DFC A64B 19CC  7AD9 D433 0926 497D 44FE
 |  Reason: Replace 0xA7771D09B55C9C2B with 0xD4330926497D44FE (Gabriele 
 Giacone) (RT #5347)
 | Migrated B5BCBDDE7CA813D4F6A3D135A7771D09B55C9C2B to 
 5BD067A29DFCA64B19CC7AD9D4330926497D44FE.
 | 14 acl entries changed: sweethome3d, ubiquity-extension, pidgin-skype,
 | sweethome3d-furniture, sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree,
 | sweethome3d-furniture-editor, sweethome3d-textures-editor, jedit,
 | jxplorer, sunflow, gnash, critterding, freehep-graphics2d, lightspark
 +---

Thanks Ansgar. I've successfully uploaded _sweethome3d_, I guess it
would have been rejected due to unrecognized new key (I didn't try few
hours ago, it FTBFS'ed due to unmet deps).
Unfortunately rejection in question was about _sweethome3d-textures_
and sorry, I didn't recall it's not even in archive, so NEW uploads
are not allowed is more than correct.

RFS at https://bugs.debian.org/740032 [CC'ing]
Eriberto, I don't like getting one package per zipfile because they
get always released together. Due to non-free licenses, I already had
to split furniture into s-furniture and s-furniture-nonfree, I would
have preferred just one big furniture package.
Eriberto and bigger-but-fewer-packages approach fan, any chance to get
it sponsored as-is?

Thanks,
-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CABcaWC1ANn8COCNfA8=fagtABzkB=4ui4vuarrprns6oflb...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote:
 Hi want help you (as sponsor). Where I can find the original upstream tarball?

debian/watch file and debian/rules get-orig-source should help.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/sweethome3d/files/SweetHome3D-textures/Textures-1.0.1/

I already maintain all sweethome3d* packages, under Java team
umbrella. DM upload permissions would be appreciate too.
Thanks,
-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cabcawc0iachpejogwzgnhrqe-vd7npm2ar3duihjtvwi35q...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote:
 Hum... Not a good reply... I should find the download site in
 d/copyright header.

Right, fixed on git
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/sweethome3d-textures.git

 Do you made a unique tarball from two independent zips?

Yes, they are usually released together. s-furniture and
s-furniture-nonfree already work this way, by packaging respectively 5
and 3 zipfiles.
I don't recall why I didn't do multi-tarball packaging, perhaps at
that time it wasn't supported by git-buildpackage? No idea whether it
is at the moment.

 Other question: why your team doesn't sponsored your package?

Probably because I didn't ask not to bother them and in this case I
wasn't in a hurry at all.
Last sweethome3d* uploads had been sponsored by Tony Mancill.
Mentors is a good place to get time from people who want to share it.

-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cabcawc2n+ao_ufwgkv6td8jxavmd40oevi1+yjjyzcdkpjd...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#740032: sweethome3d-textures: new upstream release 1.0.1

[Gabriele Giacone]

Control: reopen -1

Uploaded new upstream version 1.0.1:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-textures

 dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-textures/sweethome3d-textures_1.0.1-1.dsc

Thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140715084244.GA32007@jessie01

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0-1 [ITP]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package sweethome3d-textures

* Package name: sweethome3d-textures
  Version : 1.0-1
  Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret eTeks i...@eteks.com
* URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/
* License : CC-BY-4.0 International
  Programming Lang: no code, zip archives containing properties files
and jpeg images
  Description : Interior 2D design application with 3D preview
(additional textures)
  Section : graphics

Upstream started releasing additional textures libraries:
http://www.sweethome3d.com/blog/2014/02/24/textures_libraries_1_0.html

It builds those binary packages:

  sweethome3d-textures - Interior 2D design application with 3D
preview (additional textures)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-textures

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-textures/sweethome3d-textures_1.0-1.dsc

Regards,
-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CABcaWC0Gm6NHpui7ENbx==dcwxvac9aywdlnvolkizt8q3r...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#740035: RFS: sunflow and sweethome3d [DM but 1st upload to backports]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

[ X-Debbugs-CC'ing tmancill who sponsored me many times lately and 
d-backports@l.d.o ]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my packages sunflow and sweethome3d.
I have DM grant for both but first upload to backports needs to be
sponsored because it passes through backports NEW queue.

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/sunflow
http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget.

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d/sweethome3d_4.3+dfsg-1~bpo70+1.dsc
  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-10~bpo70+1.dsc

Remember to rebuild them with -v option as requested for backports.

  sunflow: -v3.5+dfsg-1
  sweethome3d: -v0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-9

Plus, sunflow would need to be uploaded first, sweethome3d depends on it (not
sure whether uploading sweethome3d first would be a real problem).

Thanks,
--
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140225020833.GA12871@jessie01

Bug#736952: RFS: ming/1:0.4.5-1.1 [NMU][RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote:
 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/ming/ming_0.4.5-1.1.dsc

 or clone

   https://github.com/gg0/libming-debian


 A few more comments now that I've had a chance to take a closer look
 at this package (somewhat nitpicky):
 - Your package contains a .gitignore file that wasn't there before
 (this sticks out like a sore thumb with debdiff)
 - Please close #724417 in d/changelog (the automake related build-dep update)
 - I'd actually recommend splitting out the ungif linking patch from
 03_py_ext (and as an added bonus, include a DEP-3 header with this new
 patch)

 Stuart, assuming you have no objections (or if you don't respond),
 I'll be uploading this to the delayed queue once the above issues are
 fixed.

Reuploaded, pushed changes.
Thanks for your time.
-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cabcawc2rt7gmhs6hczeea0xbngaqekzqpdqpzfoezhv+arw...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#736952: RFS: ming/1:0.4.5-1.1 [NMU][RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

[ CC'ing Stuart R. Anderson anderson@d.o, maintainer ]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package ming

 * Package name: ming
   Version : 1:0.4.5-1.1
   Upstream Author : Dave m...@opaque.net, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net
 * URL : http://www.libming.org/
 * License : mainly LGPL-2.1
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

 libming-dev - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files (development files)
 libming-util - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files - Utilities
 libming1   - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files
 libswf-perl - Ming (SWF) module for Perl
 ming-fonts-dejavu - Ming format DejaVue Fonts
 ming-fonts-opensymbol - Ming format Opensymbol Fonts
 php5-ming  - Ming module for php5
 python-ming - Ming (SWF) module for Python

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/ming

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/ming/ming_0.4.5-1.1.dsc

or clone

  https://github.com/gg0/libming-debian

Changes since the last upload:

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Fix FTBFS due to ungif linking (Closes: #733373).
  * Fix FTBFS on Hurd and against recent bison versions (Closes: #736162).
  * Strip non debian/ files.
  * Switch from superseded automake1.10 to automake.

ming has been removed from testing due to #733373.
Maintainer is unresponsive.


Regards,
 Gabriele Giacone


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cabcawc1gcwyygsmorcyo-xa1kucaa52ja1yjr3viiovvopt...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#736952: RFS: ming/1:0.4.5-1.1 [NMU][RC]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote:
 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/ming/ming_0.4.5-1.1.dsc

 or clone

   https://github.com/gg0/libming-debian

 Changes since the last upload:

   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix FTBFS due to ungif linking (Closes: #733373).
   * Fix FTBFS on Hurd and against recent bison versions (Closes: #736162).
   * Strip non debian/ files.

 Why is this necessary? This adds unwanted noise to debdiff's output,
 and shouldn't be in a NMU; please revert this.

Reuploaded, pushed changes. Also reverted unused patches rename.

   * Switch from superseded automake1.10 to automake.

 ming has been removed from testing due to #733373.
 Maintainer is unresponsive.



 Regards,
 Vincent

Thanks for reviewing.

-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CABcaWC32i7CjXM3KQ0Mqv5EVqf-3Qa+AGWD+VJGXBzeS5ts=4...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#736988: RFS: freehep-graphics2d/2.1.1-4

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package freehep-graphics2d

 * Package name: freehep-graphics2d
   Version : 2.1.1-4
   Upstream Author : CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
 SLAC, Stanford, California, U.S.A.
 University of California Santa Cruz, U.S.A.
 * URL : http://java.freehep.org/
 * License : LGPL-2.1+
   Section : java

It builds those binary packages:

  libfreehep-graphics2d-java - FreeHEP 2D Graphics Library

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/freehep-graphics2d

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freehep-graphics2d/freehep-graphics2d_2.1.1-4.dsc

Public git repo at:

  http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/freehep/freehep-graphics2d.git

Changes since the last upload:

  [ Giovanni Mascellani ]
  * Added real watch file
  * Fixed my email address.

  [ Gabriele Giacone ]
  * Added patch from sweethome3d upstream to fix SVG export (Closes: #657700)
  * Switch to 3.0 (quilt) format.
  * Make VCS-* fields canonical.
  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 (no changes).
  * Remove needless Depends on jre.
  * Fix d/copyright according to format specification 1.0.
  * Add missing classpath.
+ Add javahelper to B-D.

I'd want to fix SVG export on sweethome3d (#657700).
DM grant to stop nagging sponsors would be really appreciated too.

Regards,
  Gabriele Giacone


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CABcaWC2VkgUL=-AOW58j5YLgCCCPP7XsW-sun=jmrw3d42x...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Problem with unusual upstream source directory

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Dariusz Dwornikowski
dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
 hi again,

 So I have got a problem, upstream has localization files in po/ directory.
 When make is called, it traverses to po/ and also calls make, then .po files
 change (they are updated with the current date) like in the example below.
 Unfortunately, debuild when using quilt 3.0 format crashes with message that
 upstream has changed. Is there a way to somehow ignore these files in
 debuild. I cannot do dpkg-source --commit because these file would be
 updated anyway in every build.

Teach clean target how to remove them.

-- 
G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CABcaWC35KQCxFUr8v+Q8Vh1CywJKfaQF==hcfp-kt0a2njk...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Problem with unusual upstream source directory

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Игорь Пашев pashev.i...@gmail.com wrote:
 2014/1/3 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com:
 Teach clean target how to remove them.

 No-no-no :-)

 *.po files are handwritten [1]

$ debuild -ipo

-- 
G..e


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cabcawc2ldbuzcoo9wvggsrjvwab9xsg04xf_-4z4oyewedc...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Problem with unusual upstream source directory

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Игорь Пашев pashev.i...@gmail.com wrote:
 2014/1/3 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com:
 Teach clean target how to remove them.

 No-no-no :-)

 *.po files are handwritten [1]

 $ debuild -ipo

Sorry, -i^po/ is better or -I option, see dpkg-source man page.

-- 
G..e


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CABcaWC2+xo1YK=z0adY3Q+GWrOVxs+p_m=kvm+ggg7ufz2d...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#694387: RFS: pidgin-skype/20121121+svn646+dfsg-1 [DM but packages in NEW]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-skype

 * Package name: pidgin-skype
   Version : 20121121+svn646+dfsg-1
   Upstream Author : Eion Robb eionr...@gmail.com
 * URL : https://code.google.com/p/skype4pidgin/
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : contrib/net

It builds those binary packages:

 empathy-skype - Skype plugin for libpurple messengers (Empathy-specific files) 
[NEW]
 pidgin-skype - Skype plugin for libpurple messengers (Pidgin-specific files)
 pidgin-skype-common - Skype plugin for libpurple messengers (common files) 
[NEW]
 pidgin-skype-dbg - Skype plugin for libpurple messengers (debug symbols)

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pidgin-skype/pidgin-skype_20121121+svn646+dfsg-1.dsc

I split p-s binary into p-s-common which actually contains libpurple
plugins, p-s for pidgin theme and icons and empathy-s for empathy icons.
Thus it needs to pass through NEW queue.

Could anyone please upload it for me? 

Thanks,
-- 
Gabriele


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121125233923.GA4228@wheezy01

Bug#690010: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 689980 by -1

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package sweethome3d-furniture-editor

 * Package name: sweethome3d-furniture-editor
   Version : 1.8-1
   Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret, eTeks i...@eteks.com
 * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : java

  sweethome3d-furniture-editor - Sweet Home 3D Furniture Library Editor

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furniture-editor

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furniture-editor/sweethome3d-furniture-editor_1.2-1.dsc


  Regards,
   Gabriele Giacone


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507360e8.7020...@gmail.com

Bug#690010: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Sorry, correct dsc path is

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furniture-editor/sweethome3d-furniture-editor_1.8-1.dsc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507361f8.5080...@gmail.com

Bug#689126: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture{,nonfree}/1.2-1 [ITP]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Renamed to furniture (w/o s) and reuploaded.

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furniture
 http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furniture/sweethome3d-furniture_1.2-1.dsc
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/s/sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree/sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree_1.2-1.dsc

http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/sweethome3d-furniture.git;a=summary
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree.git;a=summary

-- 
Gabriele


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50699166.3070...@gmail.com

Bug#689126: RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures{,-nonfree}/1.2-1 [ITP]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my packages sweethome3d-furnitures and
  sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree

 * Package name: sweethome3d-furnitures
   Version : 1.2-1
   Upstream Author : Various SweetHome3D contributors
 * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/importModels.jsp
 * License : CC-BY-3.0 Unported, CC-BY-3.0 USA
   Section : graphics

 * Package name: sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree
   Version : 1.2-1
   Upstream Author : Various SweetHome3D contributors
 * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/importModels.jsp
 * License : Free Art License 1.3
   Section : graphics


sweethome3d-furnitures - Interior 2D design application with 3D preview
 (additional furnitures)
sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree - Interior 2D design application with 3D
 preview (additional non-free furnitures) 

  To access further information about these packages, please visit the following
  URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furnitures
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree


  Alternatively, one can download the packages with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furnitures/sweethome3d-furnitures_1.2-1.dsc
dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/s/sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree/sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree_1.2-1.dsc


  Regards,
   Gabriele Giacone


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120929105426.GA26337@phenomenon

Bug#688411: sponsorship-requests: Please convert my DM upload permissions to new format

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Attached file should grant me upload permissions according to new interface [0] 
for
packages I currently can upload [1].
Rename it replacing LOGIN and EPOCH.

Thanks.

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg8.html
[1] http://deb.li/OxV4
Archive: ftp.debian.org

Action: dm
Fingerprint: B5BCBDDE7CA813D4F6A3D135A7771D09B55C9C2B
Allow: critterding gnash jedit jinput jutils jxplorer lwjgl sunflow sweethome3d 
ubiquity-extension pidgin-skype

Bug#688411: sponsorship-requests: Please convert my DM upload permissions to new format

[Gabriele Giacone]

On 09/22/2012 04:43 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
 On 22.09.2012 16:28, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
 Attached file should grant me upload permissions according to new interface 
 [0] for
 packages I currently can upload [1].
 ...
 Allow: critterding gnash jedit jinput jutils jxplorer lwjgl sunflow
 sweethome3d ubiquity-extension pidgin-skype
 
 Uhm. I don't think this meant that way. Instead you should ask your
 previous DMUA sponsor(s) individually for the package(s) they advocated you.

I don't think it'd be better bothering several DDs instead of only one
who should just check I've kept uploading almost all packages more or
less frequently.

But yes, I'll do that way if I get no response here. More mails, more
people involved, more time each one of them should find to convert
permissions.


-- 
Gabriele


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/505ddd1c.4090...@gmail.com

Bug#674483: RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] (Was: Re: Bug#674483: RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] -- Web-oriented universal programming language)

[Gabriele Giacone]

Please upload haxe and neko for me before the freeze.
I'm trying to adopt them just because haxe is needed by gnash testsuite and I'd
like bringing it back in stable. Swftools has been reintroduced few months ago,
haxe would be the only missing test tool.
If I won't find any sponsor, I'll re-orphan them.

Thanks

--
Gabriele



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120628103228.GA7870@phenomenon

Bug#674483: RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] (Was: Re: Bug#674483: RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] -- Web-oriented universal programming language)

[Gabriele Giacone]

retitle 674483 RFS: haxe and neko [ITA]
thanks

haxe -- Web-oriented universal programming language
neko -- Lightweight virtual machine

On 06/13/2012 09:56 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
 You can found some lintian report. Could you check ?
   http://mentors.debian.net/package/haxe

Reuploaded, it should reappear one day. Fixed spelling errors. All
hardening tags related to usr/bin/haxe{doc,lib} went away by building
against neko = 1.8.2 I'm trying to adopt as well. Same ex-maintainer.
Both switched to a git collab-maint repo.

=
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/haxe.git

 * Package name: haxe
   Version : 1:2.9+20120414-1
   Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse ncannasse at motion-twin.com
 * URL : http://haxe.org
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : devel

haxe (1:2.9+20120414-1)
   * New upstream release.
   * Adopting package, replace maintainer (Closes: #628948).
   * Enable hardening w/o PIE.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3, no changes.
   * Add lintian overrides for hardening tags.
   * Switch VCS from hg to git.

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/haxe/haxe_2.9+20120414-1.dsc

=
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/neko.git

 * Package name: neko
   Version : 1.8.2-1
   Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse ncannasse at motion-twin.com
 * URL : http://nekovm.org
 * License : LGPL-2.1
   Section : interpreters

neko (1.8.2-1)
   * New upstream release.
   * Adopting package, replace maintainer (Closes: #628939).
   * Enable hardening, disable PIE on hurd.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3, no changes.
   * Add lintian overrides for hardening tags.
   * Switch VCS from hg to git.
   * Remove quilt from B-D.

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/neko/neko_1.8.2-1.dsc
=

Thanks
-- 
Gabriele



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe270ad.9080...@gmail.com

Bug#674483: RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] -- Web-oriented universal programming language

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package haxe.

haxe has been removed one year ago due to FTBFS on kfreebsd still
reproducible http://deb.li/3KVzx. This version builds fine.

 * Package name: haxe
   Version : 1:2.9+20120414-1
   Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse ncannasse at motion-twin.com
 * URL : http://haxe.org
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : devel

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/haxe/haxe_2.9+20120414-1.dsc

  * New upstream release.
  * Adopting package, replace maintainer (Closes: #628948).
  * Enable hardening w/o PIE.
  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3, no changes.


-- 
Gabriele



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fbec778.7090...@gmail.com

Bug#660774: RFS: gnash/0.8.10-3~bpo60+1 [DM uploads to bpo]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On 02/26/2012 02:34 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
 it looks like gnash is no longer on mentors.d.n, probably it was removed
 because unstable has a higher version (might be a bug in debexpo).
 
 Could you make the package available somewhere else? Also consider to
 update the Git branch as well.

I can dput it correctly and git repo is already updated and tagged.

[same previous link]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnash/gnash_0.8.10-3~bpo60+1.dsc

Thanks.
-- 
Gabriele



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f4a3d51.9090...@gmail.com

Bug#660774: closed by Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org (Re: Bug#660774: RFS: gnash/0.8.10-3~bpo60+1 [DM uploads to bpo])

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 02:54:46PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
 The last change is from 2011-08-04.  Maybe you forgot to push the
 changes?

It was neither updated nor tagged as I said. Sorry. Pushed.

--
Gabriele



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120226150951.GA10526@phenomenon

Bug#660774: RFS: gnash [DM uploads to bpo]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests

Hi,
following [0], first upload has to be sponsored.
Could anyone please upload gnash to backports for me?

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnash/gnash_0.8.10-3~bpo60+1.dsc

[it should go in testing tomorrow]

Thanks.
-- 
Gabriele

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2011/12/msg00011.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f43e7a3.8050...@gmail.com

Re: upload to debian.mentors disappears without a trace.

[Gabriele Giacone]

On 02/20/2012 03:11 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Paul Elliott wrote:
 
 I have successfully uploaded to debian mentors, it has been more than 30 min.
 package has not appeared on list, no email message about it of any kind.
 
From the logs it seems to have been rejected because it wasn't
 directed at one of the Debian suites/codenames. Please put 'unstable'

It also seems orig.tar is missing. Last week I faced the same issue (no
packages uploaded, no mail) and that was part of the problem (remaining
part was someone else had already uploaded the package).
Be sure to pass -sa to dpkg-buildpackage.

-- 
Gabriele


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f41b0e9.4090...@gmail.com

Re: upload to debian.mentors disappears without a trace.

[Gabriele Giacone]

On 02/20/2012 03:39 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
 Looks like you are right there. This was a -1 upload sp
 dpkg-buildpackage should have automatically included the orig.tar.gz
 unless Paul explicitly did not include it (using -sd).

Or a duplicate -1 changelog entry?

from dpkg-genchanges man:
By default, the original source will be included only if the upstream
version number (the version without epoch and without Debian revision)
differs from the upstream version number of the previous changelog entry.

-- 
Gabriele, who tries to be wrong creatively


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f41b937.5050...@gmail.com

RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

[Gabriele Giacone]

[ cc'ing d-mentors for RFS and mentors.d.o problems ]

Hi,
following [0], first upload has to be sponsored.
Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me?

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-9~bpo60+1.dsc
[sweethome3d link is missing, uploaded to mentors but I got no response
and it's not in package list]

At the moment, you can pick them up both on backports.d.o under
pub/UploadQueue because of my uploads without sponsor.

Thanks.

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2011/12/msg00011.html
-- 
Gabriele


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f33a577.4080...@gmail.com

Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Package: sponsorship-requests

Packages available at ftp://backports-master.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue

 Original Message 
Subject: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:52:39 +0100
From: Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com
To: Debian Backports debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org
CC: Debian Mentors debian-mentors@lists.debian.org

[ cc'ing d-mentors for RFS and mentors.d.o problems ]

Hi,
following [0], first upload has to be sponsored.
Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me?

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-9~bpo60+1.dsc
[sweethome3d link is missing, uploaded to mentors but I got no response
and it's not in package list]

At the moment, you can pick them up both on backports.d.o under
pub/UploadQueue because of my uploads without sponsor.

Thanks.

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2011/12/msg00011.html
-- 
Gabriele




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f33d4f3.90...@gmail.com

Re: Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

[Gabriele Giacone]

On 02/09/2012 04:04 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
 tag 659243 + moreinfo
 thanks
 
 On 02/09/2012 03:15 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
 Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me?
 
 What about [1]?

Feb 09 12:15:37 gg0   Ganneff: I'm a DM, we have 2 packages with DMUA
set in testing. what else do you need to test something?
Feb 09 12:47:52 Ganneff   gg0: them in backports

-- 
Gabriele


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f33e399.2000...@gmail.com

Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

[Gabriele Giacone]

Both links:

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-9~bpo60+1.dsc
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d/sweethome3d_3.4+dfsg-1~bpo60+1.dsc

On 02/09/2012 04:17 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
 On 02/09/2012 04:04 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
 tag 659243 + moreinfo
 thanks

 On 02/09/2012 03:15 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
 Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me?

 What about [1]?
 
 Feb 09 12:15:37 gg0   Ganneff: I'm a DM, we have 2 packages with DMUA
 set in testing. what else do you need to test something?
 Feb 09 12:47:52 Ganneff   gg0: them in backports
 


-- 
Gabriele



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f347ba2.6090...@gmail.com

Re: Flash in debian

[Gabriele Giacone]

On 01/28/2012 02:09 PM, Christian Welzel wrote:
 A free runtime would be gnash.

If swf is AS3 (AVM2), runtime can't be gnash cause it plays AS2 (AVM1)
only. Your player would be lightspark if able.

http://wiki.gnashdev.org/FAQ#What_should_gnash_play

By the way, besides flex-sdk, you might try as3compile from swftools.
Swftools has been removed time ago due to unsolved security issues
related to xpdf. It might be readded by fixing them or by removing pdf
stuff.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/07/msg00249.html


-- 
Gabriele


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2441a0.1080...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: gnash (squeeze backports)

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 08/08/2011 12:28 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
 Uploaded, in NEW of backports-master now.
 
Thanks.

[CC'ing mailing lists to make them know that]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk4/xpEACgkQp3cdCbVcnCs0RQCg1RGuAfwdDQWEKzS/PRuFolgS
2q8An0lNo01cmPCF2g1qrP5Q/xHNUbwr
=qJ/M
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e3fc6a2.2090...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted two uploads ago)

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 08/08/2011 12:18 PM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
 I try to look at it tonight but I can't assure that I'll
 have the time. Are there important fixes included that should
 hit the worl^unstable asap?
I'd say there aren't any. No problem, take your time.

 BTW you should've pinged me somewhat earlier after the squeeze release
 to re-upload 0.11.1 to unstable.
Yeah, that's also what lintian suggests. I forgot we had uploaded to
experimental.
0.11.2 has very few changes since 0.11.1 BTW.

Thanks for your time.
- --
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk4/yoYACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvJXgCeNK6Rc1cC7Cz0/3tSLxIke165
ziEAoNeVYAFf0O49BTKDZjXr8x9H7ox3
=Ofyc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e3fca86.9020...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted two uploads ago)

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Kilian,

On 08/08/2011 10:07 PM, Kilian Krause wrote:
 1.) I see you now want the upload in unstable. I hope this was intended as
 0.11.2-1 was only uploaded to experimental.
0.11.1-1 was only uploaded to experimental due to freeze. I'd want
0.11.2-1 in unstable.

 2.) Your patch debian/patches/01errno doesn't have any header explaining
 where it came from (backported from upstream, self invented) and no notion
 whether or not it was reported back upstream which it should have. I'm
 sure upstream will like to have it unless they haven't already come up
 with that solution in SVN/CVS/Git (in which case you can just refer to
 that specific commit)
It's self invented, fixes build process and upstream has been informed
with a private email.

 3.) You edit debian/changelog for past entries. This should not be done. As
 the edit is minor I'll leave it as is.
Truth is hoexter (0.11.1-1 uploader) made such change [0] before
uploading and I didn't port it back to my git repo. Result: not present
in 0.11.2-1.
For non-reviewers: we are talking about no changes needed present or
not after Bump Standards Version to std-ver.

 Built, Signed, Uploaded.
Thank you both.
No one set DMUA flag so see you next upstream release :)

- --
Gabriele

[0] 20101231184306.GC31487@marvin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk5AUiwACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsEEwCgyBB9SAR8NfgX4bN0GAAgvsaw
80kAn238oyUaXb5vcEivUDEey9hD/huD
=4Tih
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e40522c.4000...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted two uploads ago)

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 08/09/2011 12:31 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
 I'm not yet sure what to learn from this issue but I found it more
 concerning that you, I guess by accident, refreshed the finishing line
 for the changelog entry. Now we've this in the changelog:
[...]
 obexpushd (0.11.1-1) experimental; urgency=low
[...]
  -- Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com  Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:57:03 +020
 
 That's bogus in so far that the upload to experimental didn't happen today
 but back in December 2010.

For completeness, my fault:
===
commit 9af082f0f04073d01f8b91a0faa8548dd4388377
Author: Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com
Date:   Mon Aug 8 01:57:38 2011 +0200

Remove DMUA.

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 28e8a7b..d32803e 100644
- --- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,13 +1,12 @@
- -obexpushd (0.11.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
+obexpushd (0.11.1-1) experimental; urgency=low

   * New upstream release.
 + Fix NULL pointer dereference (Closes: #592270).
   * Standards-Version to 3.9.1.
   * d/copyright: Fixed md5.c path.
   * Removed Ola Lundqvist from Uploaders.
- -  * Added DMUA flag.

- - -- Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com  Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:47:52
+0100
+ -- Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com  Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:57:03 +0200
[...]
===

 
 I failed in a similar way when I replied in private instead
 of CC'ing -mentors, which might have avoid this mess. :(
 At least it won't hurt anyone, it's just a broken history.

Sorry, I'll restore correct date in the next upload. Thanks!

- --
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk5AcAwACgkQp3cdCbVcnCtgPQCdFjMqXqmNnuGaU72SalCsMTZJ
CNAAniwPRoDH0CCZwCSulgYJayGp9DEs
=s0QA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e40700c.6070...@gmail.com

RFS: obexpushd (adopted two uploads ago) (was: Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted one upload ago))

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear mentors,

[CC'ing hoexter who uploaded the last one]

I am looking for a sponsor for my package obexpushd.

* Package name: obexpushd
  Version : 0.11.2-1
  Upstream Author : Hendrik Sattler p...@hendrik-sattler.de
* URL : http://www.gitorious.org/obexpushd
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : comm

It builds these binary packages:
obexpushd  - program for receiving files via Bluetooth or IRDA

The package is lintian clean.

$ dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/obexpushd/obexpushd_0.11.2-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
DMUA flag would be really appreciated too.

Kind regards
 Gabriele Giacone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk4/OQ8ACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvMOwCghB77/AV+rpjw0YhjmBewRMLt
D/oAn0e1QmhCny5fHCW/BqzAMEA88Z6j
=w6Fy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e3f390f.8030...@gmail.com

RFS: gnash (squeeze backports)

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear backports sponsors,

[CC'ing d-mentors (anyone interested in?)]

I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnash.

* Package name: gnash
  Version : 0.8.10~git20110618-3~bpo60+1
  Upstream Author : Gnash development team gnash-...@gnu.org
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/
http://www.gnashdev.org/
* License : GPL-3+
  Section : video

It builds these binary packages:
browser-plugin-gnash - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - Plugin for
Mozilla and derivat
gnash  - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player
gnash-common - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - Common files/libraries
gnash-common-opengl - dummy package for gnash-common-opengl removal
gnash-cygnal - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - Media server
gnash-dbg  - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - Debug symbols
gnash-dev  - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - Development files
gnash-doc  - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - API documentation
gnash-ext-fileio - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - Fileio extension
gnash-ext-lirc - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - LIRC extension
gnash-ext-mysql - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - MySQL extension
gnash-opengl - dummy package for gnash-opengl removal
gnash-tools - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - Command-line Tools
klash  - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - Standalone player for KDE
klash-opengl - dummy package for klash-opengl removal
konqueror-plugin-gnash - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - Plugin for
Konqueror
mozilla-plugin-gnash - dummy package for renaming to browser-plugin-gnash
python-gtk-gnash - GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - Python bindings
swfdec-gnome - dummy package for transition to Gnash
swfdec-mozilla - dummy package for transition to browser-plugin-gnash

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnash
- - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnash/gnash_0.8.10~git20110618-3~bpo60+1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Gabriele Giacone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk4/PoIACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsn+gCcDLoGfTq8UzISDhxut1gPvV0z
VvYAnA5hq3h11jHHYRkyKsPAmX/FD4F6
=gZaq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e3f3e82.50...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: useragentswitcher

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 01/12/2011 04:29 AM, Williams Orellana wrote:

 Maintainer: Williams Orellana worell...@williamsorellana.org
 Uploaders: Debian Mozilla Extension Maintainers 
 pkg-mozext-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org

You should swap Maintainer and Uploaders: Extension team as maintainer
and yourself as uploader.


- --
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk0vhEkACgkQp3cdCbVcnCv8TACfSO2Fy2BqDttbNSvFIBb3W4yc
aCUAoMWfypsbtuANlfVbi0m1iThotnsp
=P8Mt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d2f8456.3080...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted one upload ago)

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/31/2010 07:43 PM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
 Uploaded to experimental (cause of the freeze).

There are no reverse B-D/Depends so I guess unstable would have been
good too or better, no need to reupload it when squeeze is out.

 And yes, I removed the DMUA flag.
 If you change the Standards-Version in the future please note aswell if
 you had to change things or not, I've added a small note this time.
 And for some bad vibration add a random rant about CDBS. ;)

nah I like CDBS :)

Thanks for your upload.
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk0efK8ACgkQp3cdCbVcnCs1bwCfeMk82Mk3u6eC6aRsw3EE4u/G
xkgAoPQ1xcYDo3sS4mwgkJ0uXEIglcxd
=QtqA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d1e7cbe.5050...@gmail.com

RFS: obexpushd (adopted one upload ago)

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package obexpushd.

* Package name: obexpushd
  Version : 0.11.1-1
  Upstream Author : Hendrik Sattler p...@hendrik-sattler.de
* URL : http://www.hendrik-sattler.de/devel/obexpushd/
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : comm

It builds these binary packages:
obexpushd  - program for receiving files via Bluetooth or IRDA

The package is lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 592270

I adopted it one upload ago and the sponsor, one of the sponsors before
adoption, is not so willing to upload it once again.
The package is tiny and easy to maintain.
I added DMUA flag but please remove it (d/changelog entry as well) if
you don't trust me.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/obexpushd
- - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/obexpushd/obexpushd_0.11.1-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Gabriele Giacone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk0cPA8ACgkQp3cdCbVcnCs8YQCeLfygXp9OmlhBk6e1lmX+L1g6
C1MAoKN0ZqDFTn7FHTtzXNU5ruKfQ7DX
=ol6A
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d1c3c0f.3050...@gmail.com

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/31/2010 05:54 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
 Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 02:51 +0200 schrieb Gabriele Giacone:
 1) Please rename the source package to ubiquity-extension (or
 Done
 
 Can you rename the git repository too?
Renamed.

 3) ${xpi:Recommends} (= 3.6) doesn't work, because multiple items
 could be generated. If you want versioned Recommends, mozilla-devscripts
 needs to be adjusted.
 It generates Recommends: iceweasel (= 3.6) which seems to be ok. What
 multiple items do you mean in this case?
 
 It depends on your build system (Debian vs Ubuntu) and on the
 install.xpi file. For example, adblock-plus has iceweasel | icedove |
 iceape | conkeror in Recommends. Don't rely that it will always be one
 item. Use Recommends: iceweasel (= 3.6), ${xpi:Recommends} or file a
 wishlist bug against mozilla-devscripts.
 
Probably you meant install.rdf.
I was forgetting that we're also packaging it for ubuntu and was
hardcoding just iceweasel (= 3.6) while you'd prefer adding
unversioned ${xpi:Recommends}.
On ubuntu, would this xpi generate more than one Recommends? If it would
not, I'd set back initial ${xpi:Recommends} (= 3.6) which should work
on both worlds and postpone further changes to next upstream release or
until anyone closes the bug I just filed http://bugs.debian.org/602051
Maybe you'll close such bug before I find a sponsor.


Thanks,
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzOIpwACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvn6QCfftEX8zW0FIO0F/D4r/l45L2F
noIAoKx9RYoEfuECJTYsdxbvgjz/TdzA
=sSnq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cce22a2.6000...@gmail.com

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/30/2010 03:34 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
 On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 10/26/2010 07:41 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
 We try and maintain a symbiotic relationship with Debian. If we fix
 something, we send it upstream to help Debian. When Debian fixes
 something, we benefit.
 
 IMHO just the latter is always true.
 
 I'm working with Debian, and I'm not a DM, DD or anything. Therefore
 saying that the latter is always true is wrong. However, your bias is
 clearly noted. Also wrong, but noted.

For the latter, I mean When Debian fixes something, we benefit and
such fixes _always_ go to ubuntu when sync runs.
On the contrary, when something is fixed on ubuntu just _sometimes_ it's
sent back to Debian.

 Anyway, renamed.
 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/ubiquity-mozilla/ubiquity-mozilla_0.6-1.dsc
 
 You're having trouble following the rules. I'm going to CC the Debian
 Group to see if they could help you.
 
 I quote:
 
 The binary package's name should be xul-ext-ext with ext being the
 extension's name. E.g. xul-ext-nostalgy for Icedove's nostalgy
 extension.
 
 ( as was noted before at http://wiki.debian.org/Mozilla/ExtensionsPolicy )
 
 
 You should rename the package to fix Debian's conventions.

Mails from M.Shuler in this thread will help you.
If you don't want to read not even them, we're talking about source
package name.

 You should also consider being nicer to people and sister projects.
 Such unjustified and blind hate is not proper. It makes me not want to
 help you, at all.

Given that you're interested in ubuntu packages, you could have learnt
what happens if source package name already exists and how to manage
that on ubuntu side: I guess blacklisting as requested by Luca then
probably renaming to ubiquity-whatever. How about time spent doing that
rename instead of writing to d-mentors?
I would have considered that as your love of ubuntu.
More love of ubuntu could also be adding some ubuntu-related ubiquity
extension commands as Filippo and others did for debian ones [1].

[removed rant]


- --
Gabriele

[1]
http://people.debian.org/~filippo/ubiquity-commands/ubiquity-commands.html

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzMSF4ACgkQp3cdCbVcnCs+bQCdFOIXhdq0IJ3o4Y6T4iPSXzZC
MXkAoIheVwwie42BeZzLY0KdPpH0ocS/
=6K3S
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ccc4865.90...@gmail.com

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/30/2010 06:53 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
 On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Given that you're interested in ubuntu packages, you could have learnt
 what happens if source package name already exists and how to manage
 that on ubuntu side: I guess blacklisting as requested by Luca then
 probably renaming to ubiquity-whatever. How about time spent doing that
 rename instead of writing to d-mentors?
 
 That harsh attitude towards people trying to help you certainly makes
 your request for sponsoring look really good. Well done.

I would read what you quote even in this way: Ubuntu is a Debian
derivative not the contrary. Why should we rename source packages if
their name already exists in derivatives? For NEW packages, should we
check in ~140 derivatives? Or should derivatives manage that?. You know
my position.

I don't like discriminating among them eg. I look at DDPOs with
ubuntu=0. Does anyone know how not to display derivs info on PTS?

Regarding sponsors, I hope they are interested in this package, not in
the packager. Unfortunately, I need a sponsor and I don't intent to
apply to NM process yet. Probably when I feel ready to do it, Debian
will already completely be assimilated by uborg.


- --
Gabriele, who thinks he should have joined the project 10 years ago.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzMgRoACgkQp3cdCbVcnCs0CgCgqseRtJff5ouVdRfK7nAkKGYa
sbsAn33V379tmbw1lcXqcm8vMDC9SltU
=TKdF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ccc8126.9020...@gmail.com

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/31/2010 01:00 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
 I did a quick review:
 
 1) Please rename the source package to ubiquity-extension (or
Done

 2) You use features of mozilla-devscripts 0.22 [2]. Please adjust the
 Build-Depends.
Done

 3) ${xpi:Recommends} (= 3.6) doesn't work, because multiple items
 could be generated. If you want versioned Recommends, mozilla-devscripts
 needs to be adjusted.
It generates Recommends: iceweasel (= 3.6) which seems to be ok. What
multiple items do you mean in this case?

 4) Don't rely on the installation destination of install-xpi (run by
 dh_auto_install). It may change in the future. Run install-xpi
 -i /usr/share/xul-ext/$(NAME) [...] instead of dh_auto_install.
Done

 5) You may be interested in xpi-repack to get rid of the get-orig-source
 rule (more details in the man page).
Done


Thanks for your review.
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzMvX0ACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvKdACfYHObJYsDFJxcyx6CGlOzzvFt
EdAAn0juN5EnELIdC0T3gBjM5vgOLXsT
=euL/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cccbd7d.6000...@gmail.com

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/26/2010 07:41 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
 We try and maintain a symbiotic relationship with Debian. If we fix
 something, we send it upstream to help Debian. When Debian fixes
 something, we benefit.

IMHO just the latter is always true.


Anyway, renamed.

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/ubiquity-mozilla/ubiquity-mozilla_0.6-1.dsc


- --
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzLUXIACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvPjwCg1pRGZCs4nVbR/+3ShVs5Ysu5
TyAAoIfJbDVfrejkfRY+U5qnPuXT/hLp
=K63L
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ccb5172.7070...@gmail.com

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

[Gabriele Giacone]

On 10/26/2010 08:52 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
 Just for the records, Ubuntu has a ubiquity source package already (it's
 the d-i frontend), so if you're interested in having such package in
 Ubuntu too, you should consider using a different source name.
 
I'm not interested in ubuntu.
Rename could be even done by ubuntu maintainers, couldn't it?

Anyway, your sponsorship might convince me to rename it :)


Cheers,
Gabriele


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc6dc38.3070...@gmail.com

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

[Gabriele Giacone]

On 10/26/2010 04:53 PM, Michael Shuler wrote:
 An existing source name conflict example I found:
 
 libsage2 - Source: sage
 xul-ext-sage - Source: sage-extension
 
 -extension sounds a little cleaner to me.  ;)

I'd like to keep ubiquity, name chosen by upstream.
And it's good because there are no packages named ubiquity in Debian.

Derivatives can choose their own package names.

Sponsors out there, I'm willing to rename source package from ubiquity
to ubiquity-yourlogin for 50$ ;)


Cheers,
Gabriele


(well, and after this one I've lost another bunch of potential sponsors.
Probably just ubu-haters remain, which often don't care desktop stuff)

RFSwitter is a microblogging service offered by boredom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc6f895.7000...@gmail.com

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

[Gabriele Giacone]

On 10/26/2010 06:17 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
 Just to avoid some people complaining, I asked Ubuntu Archive
 Administrators to include ubiquity into their sync-blacklist list, so
 Ubuntu package won't be overwritten by accident. This has been just
 accomplished, so it's much safer using ubiquity as source name now.

I didn't worry about that possible overwrite. I just thought it was a
derivative issue which would have been managed by derivative maintainers.

 I don't think Ubuntu-friendly DDs could become upset for this.
I can't see any ITS yet! :)




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc70fa7.8040...@gmail.com

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

[Gabriele Giacone]

On 10/24/2010 06:37 PM, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
 in general the auto-updating nature of feeds looks very convenient for users,
 so I'd say it would be nice to have both. i.e. extensions in the package and a
 configuration option (in the package? possibly disabled by default) to update
 the extensions via specific feeds [1], what do you think?

At this time your feed is loaded as static but users can disable such
static feed and subscribe to.
I agree it would be nice to be able to switch static to dynamic. Patches
would be very welcome :)

CC'ing d-mentors:

If anyone wants to take a look, review and possibly upload:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/ubiquity/ubiquity_0.6-1.dsc
Even DMUA flag would be really appreciated.
For impatient sponsors who want to upload during next 5 minutes, this
ubiquity version is supported by iceweasel =3.6 so it should be in
experimental.

* Package name: ubiquity
  Version : 0.6-1
  Upstream Author : Mozilla Labs Team
* URL : https://mozillalabs.com/ubiquity/
* License : MPL-1.1/GPL-2/LGPL-2.1
  Section : web

It builds these binary packages:
xul-ext-ubiquity - experimental interface based on natural language input

The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 594531 (ITP)
My motivation for maintaining this package is: I use it daily.

I added a feed maintained by DD Filippo Giunchedi [1] which provides
Debian-related commands such as shortcuts to bugs, packages, buildd and
wiki searches.

Thanks,
Gabriele


[1]
http://people.debian.org/~filippo/ubiquity-commands/ubiquity-commands.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc60a3c.4020...@gmail.com

RFS: webmeetme - managing conferences on an Asterisk PBX

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear mentors Dear VoIP maintainers,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package webmeetme.

* Package name: webmeetme
  Version : 4.0.1-1
  Upstream Author : Arezqui Belaid are...@gmail.com, Mike Clark
mike.cl...@wpc.net, Dan Austin dan_aus...@fitawi.com
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/web-meetme/
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : comm

It builds these binary packages:
webmeetme  - suite of PHP pages for managing conferences on an Asterisk PBX

The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 586719 (ITP)

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webmeetme/webmeetme_4.0.1-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Gabriele Giacone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkwifVYACgkQp3cdCbVcnCu19QCcDm6S2J/qIVDj3bvBd6vfaI3U
iKIAoMvEKtNJWNysc5GSQnW3KiD3WveF
=fKST
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c227d56.5040...@gmail.com

Re: Upload to fix bug #580413

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 05/30/2010 01:29 PM, D Haley wrote:
[...]
 At any rate, the package is marked as DMUA, so if someone could check
 my change, which is present in the package's git repo and then
 perform an upload, or at least advise me on what to do, that would be
 very helpful.

I've taken a look at it.
For RFS'ing java packages, debian-java is a better place.

- - First of all, add default-jre to runtime dependencies.

- - Why do not convert d/copyright into DEP-5 format [1]?

- - What about switching to 3.0 (quilt) source format [2]? Anyway,
please specify source format in debian/source/format.

- - debian/dirs is unuseful

- - you may ask to upstream to version tarball filename (ie.
OpticalRayTracer_2.8_source.tar.gz) so we could add a watchfile.

On git repo, please:
- - remove upstream tarballs from master branch.
- - create upstream branch and import upstream tarball.

Now, who reviews my review?

I see it's just been uploaded. As DM, I could do it next time if you
consider my suggestions and lintian ones :)

Cheers,
Gabriele

[1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkwCibIACgkQp3cdCbVcnCuecgCgme+5JN0aL8kBX5QNicX5YRHr
VKUAnRtdyqATPe1LdlGcEm4EJXZ530TK
=86jH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c0289b2.9060...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/03/2010 09:56 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
 Okay, I'm probably doing something wrong here, but it fails to
 build:
 
 dh_testroot 
 You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!
 make: *** [maven-sanity-check] Error 1
 dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit
 status 2
 
 Full pbuilder log:
 
 http://tmp.cihar.com/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-2_amd64.build
 
 The debian/rules seem to set JAVA_HOME := /usr/lib/jvm/default-java,
 which is non existing on my system.
 
 Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in
 Build-Depends-Indep, because it is required for clean.
It seems you're not satisfying build dependencies (d-bp with -d option?).
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java is included in default-jre-headless and
default-jdk is a builddep that depends on default-jre that depends on
default-jre-headless.

default-jdk
   default-jre
  default-jre-headless

All freehep-* packages build fine in a chroot. Sweethome3d too.

Cheers,
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkuOQ3EACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsHzwCfT2c/j92f3QANqUUCp7Sf8e+r
q1MAn3ykC80UfGRvrMS9nZb+TcrpN231
=7HBu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8e437e.8010...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/03/2010 02:39 PM, Michal Čihař wrote:
 Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in
 Build-Depends-Indep, because it is required for clean.
 It seems you're not satisfying build dependencies (d-bp with -d option?).
 /usr/lib/jvm/default-java is included in default-jre-headless and
 default-jdk is a builddep that depends on default-jre that depends on
 default-jre-headless.
 
 No, please read:
 http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps
 
 The problem is that default-jdk is listed in Build-Depends-Indep, while
 it should be in Build-Depends because it is also required for clean
 target of debian/rules.
 
Thanks for pointing it out.

Could you please get the following:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freehep-xml/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-3.dsc
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freehep-graphicsio-svg/freehep-graphicsio-svg_2.1.1-2.dsc


Cheers,
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuO7hsACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsPFgCg5dnybw+zZyOR4iBn8CGI6JEX
Ar0AoPhi2XHHYbAIM1MVT+p9Zn6etf21
=Cz7b
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8eee1b.7060...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/02/2010 12:26 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
 Hi
 
 Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100
 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com napsal(a):
 
 On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal ihaY wrote:
 The license seems to be GPL-2+ (at least all file headers I checked say
 so). Please fix it in debian/copyright.
 you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU
 General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation;
 either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 At our option, we can choose GPL-3+, can't we?
 
 What would be the reason for that?
 
 Yes, technically you can, but you are supposed to describe actual
 license in debian/copyright.
Actual before or after our choice? We are redistributing it and we can
choose whether releasing it under version 2 or 3.
What reason for that? Why not?
Is GPL-2 better than GPL-3? I'm trying to understand differences between
them.
 
 Why is needed 01noMacOSX? All MacOSX code seems to be behind if, so it
 should be safe to stay, or am I wrong?
 Removed some references to MacOSX code. Without those removals, build
 fails due to classes included in AppleJavaExtension.jar which I didn't
 replace. I didn't take a deeper look at it.
 
 I would be good idea to document this in patch description. It's always
 good to mention why the patch is needed when it is not obvious.
I'll do it.

 Why do you install startup script to usr/share/sweethome3d and create
 symlink in usr/bin? I think it should be directly in usr/bin.
 I already did it for jxplorer: link without .sh extension under /usr/bin
 that refers to the script under share/application
 /usr/bin/sweethome3d - ../share/sweethome3d/sweethome3d.sh
 I like it but we can talk about it.
 Well I feel the symlink and different location is useless, but
I'd like to use package.install or dh_install but they don't rename
files. Possibly without install -d/install stuff.
And sweethome3d.jar was also feeling alone under /usr/share/sweethome3d ;)

Cheers,
Gabriele

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkuM3K4ACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvXcgCfe5LYw8nhTFQ0/nEGmL674X1q
G8IAniXFJTr0lWaVADTJhk7yLiQXCfJ4
=SwNs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8cdcbe.1060...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/02/2010 11:05 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
 For example because GPL-3 is not compatible with GPL-2 by itself. So
 once the code is under GPL-3 you can not use it in GPL-2 licensed
 program.
 Also I don't see reason why you should limit Debian users from use the
 program under terms of GPL-2.
Upstream and debian/ licenses changed back to GPL-2+.

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d/sweethome3d_2.2+dfsg-1.dsc

Thanks,
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuNe1kACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvcLwCg1XdaZ7W5c6QociyD0eEtO293
YEoAn2lXvSVv2ReBX9+d82LpmNOftq5g
=nDsG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8d7b59.2050...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Michal,

On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
 The license seems to be GPL-2+ (at least all file headers I checked say
 so). Please fix it in debian/copyright.
you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU
General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation;
either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
At our option, we can choose GPL-3+, can't we?

 The package is lintian clean and needs freehep-xml and 
 freehep-graphicsio-svg which are in NEW.
 
 For upload man would need those packages to test and build, can you
 please provide them somewhere?
http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-2.dsc
http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-graphicsio-svg_2.1.1-1.dsc

 Why is needed 01noMacOSX? All MacOSX code seems to be behind if, so it
 should be safe to stay, or am I wrong?
Removed some references to MacOSX code. Without those removals, build
fails due to classes included in AppleJavaExtension.jar which I didn't
replace. I didn't take a deeper look at it.

 Why do you install startup script to usr/share/sweethome3d and create
 symlink in usr/bin? I think it should be directly in usr/bin.
I already did it for jxplorer: link without .sh extension under /usr/bin
that refers to the script under share/application

/usr/bin/sweethome3d - ../share/sweethome3d/sweethome3d.sh

I like it but we can talk about it.

Cheers,
Gabriele



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkuMAQAACgkQp3cdCbVcnCs+zACeJatOasy2uwUZq/9B6hq+CZXM
arYAn1tfrpkyYhwqPPLVgsYCy54Jor34
=O1UF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8c0100.3030...@gmail.com

RFS: sweethome3d

[Gabriele Giacone]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package sweethome3d.

* Package name: sweethome3d
  Version : 2.2+dfsg-1
  Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret, eTeks i...@eteks.com
* URL : http://www.sweethome3d.eu/
* License : GPL-3+
  Section : java

It builds these binary packages:
sweethome3d - Interior 2D design application with 3D preview

The package is lintian clean and needs freehep-xml and 
freehep-graphicsio-svg which are in NEW.


The upload would fix these bugs: 475922

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d/sweethome3d_2.2+dfsg-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone reviewed and possibly uploaded this package
for me.

Kind regards
 Gabriele Giacone

(I wanted to sign this email but I've just upgraded to icedove 3.0.1 
from experimental and it seems enigmail for amd64 is not available)




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8aa038.1080...@gmail.com

RFS: sunflow

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package sunflow.

* Package name: sunflow
  Version : 0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-1
  Upstream Author : Christopher Kulla cku...@gmail.com
* URL : http://sunflow.sourceforge.net/
* License : MIT
  Section : graphics

It builds these binary packages:
sunflow- rendering system for photo-realistic image synthesis

The package appears to be lintian clean.

My motivation for maintaining this package is:
sweethome3d (ITP [1]) depends on it.
Cyril KiBi Brulebois let me to become its new maintainer [2] without
O,RFA,ITA.

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone reviewed and possibly uploaded this package
for me.

Kind regards
 Gabriele Giacone

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/475922
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/557230#12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktiQ0AACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsXkACeNBOPWXFPcWr3oDzQXJ24wDDn
rUoAoIProjDrktQhguxU0j60telPqgu3
=q94R
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: critterding

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package critterding.

* Package name: critterding
  Version : 1.0-beta11+dfsg-1
  Upstream Author : Bob Winckelmans bob.winckelm...@telenet.be
* URL : http://critterding.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : science

It builds these binary packages:
critterding - Evolving Artificial Life

The package IS lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 565472 (ITP)

My motivation for maintaining this package is: It rocks!

2 patches:
 - replaces non-free verdana fonts with liberationsans-regular
 - builds against system libftgl
This software includes and uses Bullet physics (RFP [1]) which could
be packaged but it seems there is an open discussion about packaging .so
when upstream only provide .a [2][3].

I would be glad if someone reviewed and possibly uploaded this package
for me.

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/critterding/critterding_1.0-beta11+dfsg-1.dsc

Kind regards
 Gabriele Giacone

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/476284
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2008/05/threads.html#00213
[3] http://wiki.debian.org/Games/ToolsDiscuss

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktadUkACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsEwQCgvRJYhELd/N8oyPqfmoODHSWT
/84An0H/1UBMm8EJeY3bCIyaSOra7Qo5
=Texg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Request for testing by someone in -mentors (Was: Re: RFS: instantbird)

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello, a ping after 2 weeks.
could anyone satisfy Mike's request below?

Many thanks and happy 2010!
Gabriele

Mike Hommey wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:07:11AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
 On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:19:13AM +0100, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package instantbird.

 * Package name: instantbird
   Version : 0.2b1-1
   Upstream Author : Florian Quèze flor...@instantbird.org
 * URL : http://www.instantbird.com/
 * License : Mozilla tri-license MPL1.1/GPL2.0/LGPL2.1
   Section : net
 [snip]
 Before I get to build the package and see what the binary package
 actually looks like, a small nitpick that would be better to fix before
 the package gets in the NEW queue: The copyright file references
 xulrunner which is maybe not really accurate, but more importantly,
 references the mozilla files as if they were at the root of the upstream
 tarball, when they really are in a mozilla/ subdirectory.

 I'll follow up about the binary packages later, on the pkg-mozilla list
 only.
 
 Actually, I'm following up on both lists. The binary package looks fine
 from my point of view, but I would appreciate if someone from the
 -mentors crowd could actually test it (don't worry, even if the source
 is big, it compiles really quickly).
 
 Apart from the above note about the copyright file, I think this package
 is good for unstable.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Mike
 
 PS: quoting the original mail for the package location:
 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/instantbird
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
 main contrib non-free
 - dget
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/instantbird/instantbird_0.2b1-1.dsc
 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAks8xi8ACgkQp3cdCbVcnCtjogCfZhi27oCf2ifS4JzFuEaYTGtt
T6wAoI9H5ZhDzfByIRj0+csmSvH8aEGA
=1oHW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: numptyphysics

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package numptyphysics.

* Package name: numptyphysics
  Version : 0.3-1
  Upstream Author : Tim Edmonds numptyphys...@gmail.com
* URL : http://numptyphysics.garage.maemo.org/
* License : GPL-3
  Section : games

It builds these binary packages:
numptyphysics - Crayon-based physics puzzle game

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 549357

My motivation for maintaining this package is: It's a light and funny
game. Trying it, you will want to sponsor it ;)

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/numptyphysics/numptyphysics_0.3-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Gabriele Giacone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAks7f/EACgkQp3cdCbVcnCu9iQCg7CztTL2X2o+OlKUh03mf2nxx
uooAnirNj/6jrCbj9yN9tBswvOsoTUqI
=BGF4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Leo costela Antunes wrote:
 Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no traces of it either on
 the homepage, the maemo.org project page or SVN.

No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7
weeks ago, 0.3.0.3 became 0.3.0.7. We could change 0.3 in 0.3.0.7 or we
could follow a svnrevision-based versioning; I packaged the latest
revision which is 148 so something like 0.2+svn148-1.
Personally, I'd prefer the first one, 0.3.0.7.

 I'll take a look at it ASAP and get back to you.
Thanks.

Cheers,
Gabriele

[1]
https://garage.maemo.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/trunk/debian/changelog?root=numptyphysicsr1=121r2=148
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAks7l8wACgkQp3cdCbVcnCupEACfT34D5I7XTx6o0PaRUjTzPIOF
87YAnRiOEuegCxl9cwQVLoVkE4DX98I0
=arUc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Paul Wise wrote:
 Might be a good idea to poke upstream about actually releasing 0.3 properly.
Upstream poked.

 BTW, there are two ITPs, you should resolve that:

 http://bugs.debian.org/549357
 http://bugs.debian.org/496586
They have been forcemerged almost 2 months ago [1]. To close both, in
d/changelog, should I refer to both or referring to master bug (496586)
is enough or being merged closing one of them, the other one is
automatically closed?

 Also, if you're interested in games, you might want to join the Debian
 Games Team:
Thanks for the hint. Maybe next game.

Cheers,
Gabriele

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=56;bug=496586
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAks7wCcACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvrcgCeII1jl7Xd3IPzFxOWD9CQ7d1r
IV8Anil9m1tjV6dlgJvmPeatli568Iaf
=LQdo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

[Gabriele Giacone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
 Aside from these remarks, the package seems OK, the manpage is a nice
 touch, and I can't seem to replicate the segfaults I was having when I
 attempted my ITP.
 I'd still suggest co-maintaining it though, just cause I also devoted a
 few hours to it myself, both packaging and playing! ;)
Man page is only a bad copy of the homepage.
Regarding segfaults, yesterday evidently I've only chosen the right
moment you were waiting for ;), but given that you already spent a lot
of time and I didn't take it into account and given that I think I
couldn't be useful anymore, please repackage it on your own and take
ITPs back. This would also speed up release process.

Happy packaging!
Gabriele




-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAks78IgACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsPggCgu6zKjb0OZbM2IiZE4LKav19E
CIUAn1ns/yrwP2sjCNDKhD/svzD2AIwt
=zxLq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: licenses

[Gabriele Giacone]

Charles Plessy wrote:
 You can find a longer discussion about MD5 implementations in the
following
 thread on debian-mentors:


http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/2009080604.ga32...@kunpuu.plessy.org

Thanks Charles. I didn't look for similar cases otherwise I would have
found yours also recent which is really the same.
As you did I should ask upstream to replace that file with another one
because I don't want to build against it.
Also excluding it from build process is (in my case) a working solution
and the easiest way.

And what about the second case without a license. Doesn't it matter?
Does it inherit upstream license?

Cheers,
Gabriele


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

licenses

[Gabriele Giacone]

Hello mentors,
The software I'm packaging includes 2 directories which contain files
like these [1][2] and considers them as externals.
[1] shows a license. Is it good for Debian? Should I only declare in
d/copyright that software is derived from the RSA Data Security, Inc.
MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm?
[2] doesn't show a license. In this case, should we consider upstream
license?

Thanks
Gabriele

[1] http://pastebin.ca/1711064
[2] http://pastebin.ca/1711065


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: licenses

[Gabriele Giacone]

Hi Rogerio,

Rogério Brito wrote:
 I think that there are other packages in the archive that include this
 file.  That being said, why not use one of the libraries that already
 provide md5 implementations?
[...]
 The samething here. I, for instance, use libssl-dev for a package of
 mine (hfsprogs) that needs sha1 implementations.
 
 You may also consider using the gnutls implmentation of those. A small
 patch to adapt those might be very fruitful.
 
 Also, when the libraries providing the functions get improvements (like,
 for instance, specialized versions optimized for some newer CPU arch),
 you get those for for your programs. And maintenance becomes easier.

The question was about licenses because if they were ok I would build as is.
This is the scenario:
the application I'm packaging [1] includes and depends on a class
library [2], a bunch of classes for many purposes, which includes and
depends on those sha1/md5 implementations.
I already tried both openssl-dev and gnutls but function names change
and I should patch the code. I would try other ways.
An alternative way could be removing them from build process given that,
class library is a collection of classes but it seems that main
application doesn't use those md5/sha1-related classes.

Any license points of view?

Cheers,
Gabriele

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/559412
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/559719



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: instantbird

[Gabriele Giacone]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package instantbird.

* Package name: instantbird
  Version : 0.2b1-1
  Upstream Author : Florian Quèze flor...@instantbird.org
* URL : http://www.instantbird.com/
* License : Mozilla tri-license MPL1.1/GPL2.0/LGPL2.1
  Section : net

It builds these binary packages:
instantbird - instant messaging client based on XULrunner and libpurple

The upload would fix these bugs: 495736 (ITP)

My motivation for maintaining this package is:
I consider it a young but interesting project with a great potential
thanks to Mozilla XULrunner (UI,addons) and libpurple (multiprotocol)
It uses Debian XULrunner (1.9.1.5) and a strongly modified libpurple.
At the moment, building it with system libpurple is not possible.
Security team suggests to upload it in unstable but filing a blocker RC
bug to prevent inclusion in squeeze and then providing unofficial
squeeze backports. At the same time, somebody could try to patch
instantbird to make possible a build with system libpurple.
Further info in email below and here [1]
I would be glad if someone reviewed this package once again and possibly
 uploaded it for me.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/instantbird
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/instantbird/instantbird_0.2b1-1.dsc

Kind regards
 Gabriele Giacone

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2009/11/threads.html#00033


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: instantbird: modified libpurple
 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:03:47 +0100
 From: Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org
 To: Gabriele Giacone losga...@libero.it
 CC: secur...@debian.org, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org
 References: 4b036cc5.7050...@libero.it
 
 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 04:40:53AM +0100, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
 Dear security team,
 I'm trying to package instantbird [1], an instant messaging client based
 on Mozilla xulrunner and libpurple.
 Regarding xulrunner, upstream is using 1.9.2b1, Debian 1.9.1.5 and this
 is not a big problem.
 Regarding libpurple, upstream uses a modified version and at the moment
 it is not possible to build instantbird with system libpurple.
 The email I forward you contains the instantbird developer explanation
 and Mike Hommey thoughts.
 
 Is it a problem?
 If you want to take a look at my package, [2]
 
 Mike, [2] is the version after your first review.
 
 Thanks to all
 Gabriele Giacone
 
 I have no objections against uploading it to unstable, but I'm reluctant
 to include such a early release into Squeeze (so maybe just file a blocker
 RC bug and provide unofficial Squeeze backports.
 
 Libpurple is often affected by security issues (fixed through
 Pidgin) and it would be nice if instantbird upstream can work towards
 using the standard libpurple until Squeeze+1.
 
 Cheers,
 Moritz
 .









-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

no explicit license on upstream

[Gabriele Giacone]

Hello,
I'm packaging iSpy [1]. ITP [2] gives a brief description.
Upstream tarball is here [3].
Unpacking it, ispy application is under ispy directory.
Under the remaining directories, you can find a bunch of dependencies
which are already in Debian.
Good.
My question is about licenses: dependencies have been licensed well
otherwise they would not be in Debian but ispy directory and ispy
website resources don't explicitly refer to a specific license.
Should upstream create a LICENSE file? Or a manifest/disclaimer on
download page would be better? Or 1 and 2?

Below some iSpy developers thoughts. (I CCed them, please CC them)
[...]
 The bits that cannot be considered a derivative product of any GPL
 software I guess are BSD licensed,  given that all the contributors
 are contractors of the US DoE and **I think** that's the policy there.
 This is a rough guess and no one really ever looked into it.

 Work of U.S. federal government employees is in public domain says
 http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLUSGov. We are
 technically contractors and my understanding is that particular rule
 doesn't apply as such. Off the top of my head I don't recall whether
 some other agreement exists at project level (e.g. US-CMS).
[...]

Cheers,
Gabriele

[1] http://iguana.web.cern.ch/iguana/ispy/index.htm
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/559412
[3] http://iguana.web.cern.ch/iguana/ispy/ispy-sdk.tgz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: java3d-fileloader

[Gabriele Giacone]

Dear mentors, Dear Java people,

I'm packaging sweethome3d [1], a java application which depends on many
libraries, all open source and released under DSFG-compatible licenses:

 (a) libitext-java
 (b) libvecmath-java
 (c) libjava3d-java
 (d) freehep-vectorgraphics-svg
 (e) sunflow
 (f) Java3D 3DS FileLoader

(a),(b),(c) are already in Debian.
Giovanni Mascellani is packaging vectorgraphics [2], a suite of graphic
libraries including (d) and I'm trying to help him.
(e) is in Debian with version 0.07.2 (latest upstream release) but
sweethome3d needs 0.07.3b which is the latest svn snapshot (last
change 20 months ago). I asked to sunflow maintainer [3] if it is
possible to package it and he told me at the moment he could upload it
in experimental (better than nothing).
And now (f). It's a loader for file in 3D Studio format [4] by
Microcrowd under LGPL

* Package name: java3ds-fileloader
  Version : 1.2-1
  Upstream Author : Microcrowd t...@microcrowd.com
* URL : http://www.microcrowd.com
* License : LGPL
  Section : java

It builds these binary packages:
java3ds-fileloader - Java3DS 3DS FileLoader

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/java3ds-fileloader
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/java3ds-fileloader/java3ds-fileloader_1.2-1.dsc

I would be glad if some Java packaging expert reviewed and possibly
uploaded it.

Cheers,
Gabriele

[1] http://www.sweethome3d.eu
[2] http://bit.ly/7DygQP
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/557230
[4] http://www.martinreddy.net/gfx/3d/3DS.spec


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

[Gabriele Giacone]

Mentors,

Changes:
 - from contrib to non-free due to CC-BY-NC-SA PNGs license.
- debian/copyright
 - no more lintian warning (source code format error remains due to
lintian bug #552707)


Thanks
Gabriele

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/p/pidgin-skype
dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/p/pidgin-skype/pidgin-skype_0.1-1.dsc

Gabriele Giacone wrote:
 Hello mentors,
 thanks to all for your suggestions.
 
 In the version I just duploaded:
 
 - tarball contains svn version
 - debian/copyright is in DEP-5 format
 - source package format is 3.0 (quilt) (the only lintian error)
 - PNGs didn't change. I'm trying to contact the icons creator asking him
 to release also SVGs in question. It seems to be possible as he already
 did for others [1]. Public domain would be better than CC-BY-NC-SA, am
 I wrong?
 
 Errors/suggestions?
 
 Thanks
 Best regards
 Gabriele
 
 
 [1]
 http://cubestuff.wordpress.com/2009/07/04/first-release-of-breakdance-a-tango-internet-service-icon-collection-public-domain/
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

[Gabriele Giacone]

Hello mentors,
thanks to all for your suggestions.

In the version I just duploaded:

- tarball contains svn version
- debian/copyright is in DEP-5 format
- source package format is 3.0 (quilt) (the only lintian error)
- PNGs didn't change. I'm trying to contact the icons creator asking him
to release also SVGs in question. It seems to be possible as he already
did for others [1]. Public domain would be better than CC-BY-NC-SA, am
I wrong?

Errors/suggestions?

Thanks
Best regards
Gabriele


[1]
http://cubestuff.wordpress.com/2009/07/04/first-release-of-breakdance-a-tango-internet-service-icon-collection-public-domain/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: pidgin-skype

[Gabriele Giacone]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-skype".

* Package name : pidgin-skype
 Version : 0.1-1
 Upstream Author : Eion Robb eionr...@gmail.com
* URL : http://eion.robbmob.com/
* License : GPLv3
 Section : contrib/net

It builds these binary packages:
pidgin-skype - Skype plugin for Pidgin

This is the Skype API Plugin for Pidgin/libpurple/Adium. If you're
already running Skype, you can have your Skype contacts displayed with
your Pidgin/libpurple/Adium contacts. It is intended as a complete
replacement for the Skype user interface, hopefully everything you can
do in Skype you can do with this plugin.

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pidgin-skype
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pidgin-skype/pidgin-skype_0.1-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
Gabriele Giacone




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org