Re: new package (rocketworkbench), need sponsor, advocate etc

2001-10-09 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan

On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
  Greetings all,
 
  I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)...  Here's the blurb...

 Geoff,

 I don't know anything about rockets but I was intrigued.
 Your package looks good. I think you are missing a build-dependency
 on cgilib (without it, it can't find cgi.h).

Yup... you're right... I'll take care of it.


 Your debian/copyright file should say where you obtained the sources
 (which you currently have in README.Debian).


Ok.


 The layout of the original source is a bit odd. Is cpropep just
 part of the sf project, with more tools appearing later? It
 has an extra level of subdirectory than is usual eg
 rocketworkbench-1.0.20010807.orig/rocketworkbench/...


Yes, cpropep is part of a set of tools.  It's just the only one that is 
'ready'.  Yes, the source layout is pretty weird, but I didn't want to stuff 
around with it too much to get it into a Debian package.  I just use the CVS 
repository 'as is' except for a couple of 'bug fixes' to get it to compile at 
all which i'm feeding upstream and a bit of surgery to stop really broken 
utilities from attempting to being built.  I need to clean that up some more.


 /usr/share/doc/rocketworkbench/README.txt only contains build
 instructions; are they useful to the end user of the package?


Ok I'll actually *create* some better doco.  A lot of the other Debs i've 
been looking at seem to just find any README.* or other misc text files and 
dump them in doc/package/*.  I agree that it should be useful stuff and not 
just crap.  

 I haven't sponsored anyone before but I can if you wish.


Hey that'd be great.

Cheers
Geoff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new package (rocketworkbench), need sponsor, advocate etc

2001-10-09 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan

On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
  Greetings all,
 
  I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)...  Here's the blurb...

 Geoff,


[snip]



 Your debian/copyright file should say where you obtained the sources
 (which you currently have in README.Debian).


I've made it so that README.Debian has information on the debian package for 
rocketworkbench.such as, what's unique to the Debian package as opposed 
to what you could download from sourceforge etc.  ie. I said that the package 
 currently only includes the 'cpropep' utility and explained where the 
examples were on a Debian system and what extra doco (manpages) are available

That seems to better match the description of 'README.Debian' in the NMG - 
sorry should have read that a bit better.

I've put the updated package at http://oss.starbiz.com.au/

and I put an extra file called rwb-buildlog in the directory which shows the 
result of the dpkg-buildpackage to make it easier to see what i've done.

Cheers and thanks in advance

Geoff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new package (rocketworkbench), need sponsor, advocate etc

2001-10-09 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
  Greetings all,
 
  I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)...  Here's the blurb...

 Geoff,

 I don't know anything about rockets but I was intrigued.
 Your package looks good. I think you are missing a build-dependency
 on cgilib (without it, it can't find cgi.h).

Yup... you're right... I'll take care of it.


 Your debian/copyright file should say where you obtained the sources
 (which you currently have in README.Debian).


Ok.


 The layout of the original source is a bit odd. Is cpropep just
 part of the sf project, with more tools appearing later? It
 has an extra level of subdirectory than is usual eg
 rocketworkbench-1.0.20010807.orig/rocketworkbench/...


Yes, cpropep is part of a set of tools.  It's just the only one that is 
'ready'.  Yes, the source layout is pretty weird, but I didn't want to stuff 
around with it too much to get it into a Debian package.  I just use the CVS 
repository 'as is' except for a couple of 'bug fixes' to get it to compile at 
all which i'm feeding upstream and a bit of surgery to stop really broken 
utilities from attempting to being built.  I need to clean that up some more.


 /usr/share/doc/rocketworkbench/README.txt only contains build
 instructions; are they useful to the end user of the package?


Ok I'll actually *create* some better doco.  A lot of the other Debs i've 
been looking at seem to just find any README.* or other misc text files and 
dump them in doc/package/*.  I agree that it should be useful stuff and not 
just crap.  

 I haven't sponsored anyone before but I can if you wish.


Hey that'd be great.

Cheers
Geoff



Re: new package (rocketworkbench), need sponsor, advocate etc

2001-10-09 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
  Greetings all,
 
  I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)...  Here's the blurb...

 Geoff,


[snip]



 Your debian/copyright file should say where you obtained the sources
 (which you currently have in README.Debian).


I've made it so that README.Debian has information on the debian package for 
rocketworkbench.such as, what's unique to the Debian package as opposed 
to what you could download from sourceforge etc.  ie. I said that the package 
 currently only includes the 'cpropep' utility and explained where the 
examples were on a Debian system and what extra doco (manpages) are available

That seems to better match the description of 'README.Debian' in the NMG - 
sorry should have read that a bit better.

I've put the updated package at http://oss.starbiz.com.au/

and I put an extra file called rwb-buildlog in the directory which shows the 
result of the dpkg-buildpackage to make it easier to see what i've done.

Cheers and thanks in advance

Geoff



new package (rocketworkbench), need sponsor, advocate etc

2001-10-08 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan

Greetings all,

I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)...  Here's the blurb...

Package: rocketworkbench
Description: Rocket Design Utilities
 The Rocket Workbench Project is a mission to develop open source
 high quality software tools for the design of experimental rockets.
 Using the most up to date rocket theory allows the software to
 produce the most accurate results.
 .
 This package currently implements the following tools:
 cpropep - Propellant Evaluation Program


Ok...  now rocketworkbench is a 'collection' of tools of which there is 
currently only one prime time ready tool - cpropep - but others are reaching 
varying stages of usefulness which i'll add when they start working ;-)

I created a manpage for rocketworkbench which is going to be used as a 
pointer to all the utilities and a manpage for cpropep which i've fed back 
upstream and i'm guessing i'll be doing that for the other tools.  Also I had 
to do a bit of jiggery pokery to get an appropriate structure for examples 
/usr/share/rocketworkbench/examples/cpropep/  ie other utilities will fit 
at the lowest level ie. ./examples/graindesign/...   etc

There's config files under /etc/rocketworkbench/   again only one conf file 
there at the moment but there will be more.

I'm sure there's problems somewhere with what i've done so please lemme know 
what to fix.

The package can be found at 
http://oss.starbiz.com.au/rocketworkbench_1.0.20010807-1_i386.deb

I've given it a going over with lintian and it doesn't complain (any more :-) 
)

I've obviously installed it locally and it works for me - but i'm sure you've 
heard that before.

So... If someone would like to a) sponsor the package that'd be great.  If 
someone is happy to be an advocate for me and do the online advocate 
paperwork that'd be even better :-)

Anyway... you may now return to your normal scheduled viewing

Cheers
Geoff O'Callaghan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




new package (rocketworkbench), need sponsor, advocate etc

2001-10-08 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
Greetings all,

I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)...  Here's the blurb...

Package: rocketworkbench
Description: Rocket Design Utilities
 The Rocket Workbench Project is a mission to develop open source
 high quality software tools for the design of experimental rockets.
 Using the most up to date rocket theory allows the software to
 produce the most accurate results.
 .
 This package currently implements the following tools:
 cpropep - Propellant Evaluation Program


Ok...  now rocketworkbench is a 'collection' of tools of which there is 
currently only one prime time ready tool - cpropep - but others are reaching 
varying stages of usefulness which i'll add when they start working ;-)

I created a manpage for rocketworkbench which is going to be used as a 
pointer to all the utilities and a manpage for cpropep which i've fed back 
upstream and i'm guessing i'll be doing that for the other tools.  Also I had 
to do a bit of jiggery pokery to get an appropriate structure for examples 
/usr/share/rocketworkbench/examples/cpropep/  ie other utilities will fit 
at the lowest level ie. ./examples/graindesign/...   etc

There's config files under /etc/rocketworkbench/   again only one conf file 
there at the moment but there will be more.

I'm sure there's problems somewhere with what i've done so please lemme know 
what to fix.

The package can be found at 
http://oss.starbiz.com.au/rocketworkbench_1.0.20010807-1_i386.deb

I've given it a going over with lintian and it doesn't complain (any more :-) 
)

I've obviously installed it locally and it works for me - but i'm sure you've 
heard that before.

So... If someone would like to a) sponsor the package that'd be great.  If 
someone is happy to be an advocate for me and do the online advocate 
paperwork that'd be even better :-)

Anyway... you may now return to your normal scheduled viewing

Cheers
Geoff O'Callaghan