Bug#1016386: RFS: scid/1:4.7.4+dfsg1-2 -- chess database with play and training functionality
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scid": * Package name: scid Version : 1:4.7.4+dfsg1-2 Upstream Author : Fulvio Benini * URL : http://scid.sf.net * License : Tklib, GPL-2.0 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/scid Section : games The source builds the following binary packages: scid - chess database with play and training functionality scid-data - data files for scid, the chess database application To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/scid/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scid/scid_4.7.4+dfsg1-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: scid (1:4.7.4+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * debian/rules: - Pass OPTIMIZE variable without '-march=native' value to avoid build failures. Removed by mistake. P.D: The version in unstable (1:4.7.4+dfsg1-1) is not migrating to testing due to build failures. My mistake, I removed an important variable, sorry. Thanks and regards, pgpCrnUa2FW3O.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#1015248: RFS: scid/1:4.7.4+dfsg1-1 -- chess database with play and training functionality
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scid": * Package name: scid Version : 1:4.7.4+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : Fulvio Benini * URL : http://scid.sf.net * License : GPL-2.0, Tklib * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/scid Section : games The source builds the following binary packages: scid - chess database with play and training functionality scid-data - data files for scid, the chess database application To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/scid/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scid/scid_4.7.4+dfsg1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: scid (1:4.7.4+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version. * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 4.6.1. No changes required. * debain/copyright: - Update upstream and debian package copyright years. * debian/patches: - 02_uninitialized-memory-access.patch. Remove patch applied upstream. - 01_Makefile.conf.diff. Refresh patch. * debian/rules: - Remove 'OPTIMIZE' option as it gets the same value from default. P.D: I know that three days ago a new upstream version (4.8) came out but I couldn't test it and I prefer to upload this tested version before packing the most recent. Thanks and regards, pgpPVp6xkaieb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#1015247: RFS: phalanx/25-1 -- Chess playing program
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phalanx": * Package name: phalanx Version : 25-1 Upstream Author : Dusan Dobes * URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/phalanx * License : GPL-2.0+, public-domain * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/phalanx Section : games The source builds the following binary packages: phalanx - Chess playing program To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/phalanx/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/phalanx/phalanx_25-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: phalanx (25-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version. * debian/compat: Remove file. * debian/copyright: Update copyright year and my e-mail. * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 4.6.1. No changes required. - Change maintainer's e-mail. - Set Vcs* fields to Salsa. - Upgrade to debhelper compat 13. * debian/install: Book files should install to phalanx dir as they're only usable with the program. * debian/menu: Remove as menu system is deprecated (Policy >= 3.9.8). * debian/patches: - 03_makefile_DEFINES.diff: Refresh and renamed it to 01_makefile.patch - 04_PG_setboard_command.diff: Remove, applied upstream. - 05_PG_version-string.diff, 10_hardening-string-literal_search.diff, 12_hardening-string-literal_io.diff, 14_hardening-string-literal_book.diff, 16_hardening-pointer-sign_bcreate: Remove, not needed anymore. - 16_hardening-unused-but-set_endgame, 17_bcreate, 20_fix_linker_problem: Not applicable. - 02_dereference_pointer.patch: Add to fix not dereferenced pointer. (Closes: #1001069). Thanks to Michael Soyka. * debian/rules: - Add override_dh_auto_install to overwrite install dir. - Remove unnecessary dh argument. * debian/watch: - Upgrade to version 4 and handle latest version (XXV). Thanks and regards, pgpIaECZUJJUl.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Error when building using iconv to convert problematic encondings to UTF-8
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:57:21 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Are you sure converting that file is useful and won't break the software for > the > use cases when this file is used? You're right it breaks program menus[0]. Once I handle to use iconv properly I see it ... On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 22:03:30 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:57:21PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > Your input and output file is the same. Looks like iconv crashes with > > SIGBUS in this case, instead of just silently truncating the file or > > something like that, as many other tools would do in this case. If you > > really want to convert the file, you need to output the result to a > > different file and then move it to the old location. > > Or use "sponge"; package "moreutils". > I will better fill in a request/bug upstream. Thank you both! [0]https://imgur.com/a/ngd3pXb Regards, pgp9HsH_DrWpj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Error when building using iconv to convert problematic encondings to UTF-8
Dear mentors, I'm working on importing a new upstream version for scid package and I want to get rid of "national-encoding" lintian warning. I'm trying to use iconv to convert problematic encondings to UTF-8 but I always get an error, no matter where I put instructions (override_dh_auto_install, override_dh_install). Files exists when the command is launched ... I have pushed my changes to a devel branch[0]. To build from that branch I use `gbp buildpackage --git-debian-branch=devel`. --- Output --- iconv -f ISO-8859-15 -t UTF-8 -o /home/josgalo/devel/debian/packaging/scid/build-area/scid-4.7.4+dfsg1/debian/tmp/scid/usr/share/scid/tcl/lang/hungary.tcl \ /home/josgalo/devel/debian/packaging/scid/build-area/scid-4.7.4+dfsg1/debian/tmp/scid/usr/share/scid/tcl/lang/hungary.tcl make[1]: *** [debian/rules:23: override_dh_auto_install] Error del bus make[1]: se sale del directorio '/home/josgalo/devel/debian/packaging/scid/build-area/scid-4.7.4+dfsg1' make: *** [debian/rules:9: binary] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: fallo: fakeroot debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2 --- Could you point me where the error is? Or get some examples from other packages. Thank you very much! [0]https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/scid/-/tree/devel Regards, pgpC8VN_GMNCx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#982263: RFS: gringotts/1.2.10-4 [RC] -- secure password and data storage manager
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gringotts": * Package name: gringotts Version : 1.2.10-4 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish * URL : http://gringotts.shlomifish.org * License : GPL-3+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/gringotts Section : utils It builds those binary packages: gringotts - secure password and data storage manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gringotts/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gringotts/gringotts_1.2.10-4.dsc Changes since the last upload: gringotts (1.2.10-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * debian/patches: - fix-build-with-gcc-10.patch. Import patch to fix FTBFS with GCC 10. Thanks to Logan Rosen. (Closes: #957312) * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 4.5.1. No changes required. - Change maintainer's e-mail and set Vcs* fields to Salsa. * debian/copyright: - Use HTTPS as format URI and update debian copyright year and e-mail. Thanks and regards, pgpBiIyD48bae.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#977145: RFS: scid/1:4.7.0+dfsg1-2 [RC] -- chess database with play and training functionality
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scid": * Package name: scid Version : 1:4.7.0+dfsg1-2 Upstream Author : Fulvio Benini * URL : http://scid.sf.net * License : GPL-2.0, Tklib * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/scid Section : games It builds those binary packages: scid-data - data files for scid, the chess database application scid - chess database with play and training functionality To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/scid/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scid/scid_4.7.0+dfsg1-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: scid (1:4.7.0+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Use dh_python3 to calculate Python 3 dependencies as Python 2 will be removed from Debian. (Closes: #938443) * debian/control: - Build-depend on python3. - Upgrade to debhelper compat 13. - Bump to Standards-Version 4.5.1. No changes required. * debian/patches: - 03_pngfix-python3.patch. Import patch to make pgnfix work with Python 3. * debian/rules: - Add python3 to dh's --with option. * Rename TODO.debian to be included when installing. Thanks and regards, pgpjibcs_mXCB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Help with python2 removal in scid package
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 00:25:26 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 07:32:13PM +0100, Jose G. López wrote: > > D: dh_python3 fs:260: package scid details = {'requires.txt': set(), > > 'egg-info': set(), 'nsp.txt': set(), 'shebangs': {/usr/bin/python2}, > > 'public_vers': set(), 'private_dirs': {}, 'compile': False, 'ext_vers': > > set(), 'ext_no_version': set()} > At least scripts/pgnfix.py indeed has Py2 shebang. > Thank you Andrey! In the end I have chosen to replace the shebang to use python 3 explicitly. - #!/usr/bin/env python + #!/usr/bin/env python3 Uploaded again to mentors. Regards, pgpSLIfvO_TC4.pgp Description: PGP signature
Help with python2 removal in scid package
Hello, I 'm triyng to port it to python3 (bug #938443) but I'm no sure if I'm doing it well. There's only one utility, pgnfix, that uses python at all and I've imported a patch to make it work with python3. I've build the package in a clean environment (cowbuilder) and seems to be using python 3 as a dependency but at the end dh_python3 is generating a dependency on "python2:any". This is the relevant part of .build log: ... dh_python3 -O--sourcedirectory=src D: dh_python3 dh_python3:161: version: 4.20201102 D: dh_python3 dh_python3:162: argv: ['/usr/bin/dh_python3', '-O--sourcedirectory=src'] D: dh_python3 dh_python3:163: options: {'guess_deps': True, 'skip_private': False, 'verbose': False, 'arch': None, 'package': None, 'no_package': None, 'compile_all': False, 'vrange': None, 'regexpr': None, 'accept_upstream_versions': False, 'depends': None, 'depends_section': None, 'recommends': None, 'recommends_section': None, 'suggests': None, 'suggests_section': None, 'requires': None, 'shebang': None, 'ignore_shebangs': False, 'clean_dbg_pkg': True, 'no_ext_rename': False, 'no_shebang_rewrite': False, 'O': '--sourcedirectory=src'} D: dh_python3 dh_python3:164: args: [] D: dh_python3 dh_python3:165: supported Python versions: 3.8,3.9 (default=3.9) D: dh_python3 debhelper:99: skipping package scid-data (missing ${python3:Depends} in Depends) D: dh_python3 debhelper:152: source=scid, binary packages=['scid'] D: dh_python3 dh_python3:183: processing package scid... D: dh_python3 tools:102: fix_shebang (debian/scid/usr/games/sc_import): doesn't look like a shebang: #!/bin/sh I: dh_python3 tools:114: replacing shebang in debian/scid/usr/games/pgnfix D: dh_python3 tools:102: fix_shebang (debian/scid/usr/games/spf2spi): doesn't look like a shebang: #!/bin/sh D: dh_python3 tools:102: fix_shebang (debian/scid/usr/games/tkscid): cannot parse binary file D: dh_python3 tools:102: fix_shebang (debian/scid/usr/games/scidpgn): doesn't look like a shebang: #!/bin/sh D: dh_python3 tools:102: fix_shebang (debian/scid/usr/games/sc_remote): doesn't look like a shebang: #!/bin/sh D: dh_python3 tools:102: fix_shebang (debian/scid/usr/games/sc_spell): doesn't look like a shebang: #!/bin/sh D: dh_python3 tools:102: fix_shebang (debian/scid/usr/games/spliteco): doesn't look like a shebang: #!/bin/sh D: dh_python3 tools:102: fix_shebang (debian/scid/usr/games/scid): doesn't look like a shebang: #!/bin/sh D: dh_python3 tools:102: fix_shebang (debian/scid/usr/games/sc_epgn): doesn't look like a shebang: #!/bin/sh D: dh_python3 tools:102: fix_shebang (debian/scid/usr/games/sc_eco): doesn't look like a shebang: #!/bin/sh D: dh_python3 fs:260: package scid details = {'requires.txt': set(), 'egg-info': set(), 'nsp.txt': set(), 'shebangs': {/usr/bin/python2}, 'public_vers': set(), 'private_dirs': {}, 'compile': False, 'ext_vers': set(), 'ext_no_version': set()} D: dh_python3 depends:117: generating dependencies for package scid D: dh_python3 depends:275: D={'python2:any'}; R=[]; S=[]; E=[], B=[]; RT=[] I have commited the changes to https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/scid. Also it's uploaded to mentors (https://mentors.debian.net/package/scid/) in case it helps. Any advice on how to solve this would be appreciated. Thank you very much! pgpfnab3OnQaG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#955311: RFS: fathom/1.0+git.20190811.97fb5c-1 -- Command-line for probing Syzygy tablebases
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 00:43:23 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > Hi! > There's a bunch of symbols you did not include: > > --- debian/libfathom1.symbols (libfathom1_1.0_amd64) > +++ dpkg-gensymbolsmywmu5 2020-03-29 22:41:26.263845000 + > @@ -1,9 +1,20 @@ > libfathom.so.1 libfathom1 #MINVER# > * Build-Depends-Package: libfathom-dev > TB_LARGEST@Base 1.0 > + TB_MaxCardinality@Base 1.0 > + TB_MaxCardinalityDTM@Base 1.0 > + TB_probe_dtm@Base 1.0 > + encode@Base 1.0 > + first_ei@Base 1.0 > init_tablebases@Base 1.0 > + leading_pawn@Base 1.0 > load_dtz_table@Base 1.0 > + num_tables@Base 1.0 > + probe_table@Base 1.0 > + root_probe_dtm@Base 1.0 > tb_bishop_attacks@Base 1.0 > + tb_expand_mate@Base 1.0 > + tb_free@Base 1.0 > tb_init@Base 1.0 > tb_king_attacks@Base 1.0 > tb_knight_attacks@Base 1.0 > @@ -11,7 +22,9 @@ > tb_pawn_attacks@Base 1.0 > tb_pop_count@Base 1.0 > tb_pop_lsb@Base 1.0 > + tb_probe_root_dtz@Base 1.0 > tb_probe_root_impl@Base 1.0 > + tb_probe_root_wdl@Base 1.0 > tb_probe_wdl_impl@Base 1.0 > tb_queen_attacks@Base 1.0 > tb_rook_attacks@Base 1.0 > > and, they look like public interface. Hi Adam!, Thank you for your review. I have added the new symbols and re-upload the package to mentors. Regards,
Bug#955312: RFS: ethereal-chess/12.00+ds1-1 -- UCI-compliant chess engine
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ethereal-chess" * Package name: ethereal-chess Version : 12.00+ds1-1 Upstream Author : Andrew Grant * URL : https://github.com/AndyGrant/Ethereal * License : GPL-3.0-or-later * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/ethereal-chess Section : games It builds those binary packages: ethereal-chess - UCI-compliant chess engine To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ethereal-chess Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ethereal-chess/ethereal-chess_12.00+ds1-1.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/ethereal-chess Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version 12.00 * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 4.5.0. No changes required. - Add Rules-Requires-Root as neither root nor fakeroot is required. * debian/copyright: - Update copyright years. - Add Upstream-Contact field. * debian/gbp.conf: - Use default section to apply to most gpb commands. * deian/rules: - Let dh_auto_build pass cross tools to make. (Closes: #929639) Thanks to Helmut Grohne Thanks and regards, pgp2TBjfe8Hr8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#955311: RFS: fathom/1.0+git.20190811.97fb5c-1 -- Command-line for probing Syzygy tablebases
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fathom" * Package name: fathom Version : 1.0+git.20190811.97fb5c-1 Upstream Author : Jon Dart * URL : https://github.com/jdart1/Fathom * License : MIT * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/fathom Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libfathom-dev - Library for probing Syzygy tablebases (development files) libfathom1 - Library for probing Syzygy tablebases fathom - Command-line for probing Syzygy tablebases To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fathom Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fathom/fathom_1.0+git.20190811.97fb5c-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Import upstream lastest changes * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 4.5.0. No changes required. - Add Rules-Requires-Root as neither root nor fakeroot is required. * debian/copyright: - Update copyright year for Debian files. * debian/gbp.conf: - Use default section to apply to most gpb commands. * debian/rules: - Apply patch to make the build reproducible (Closes: #941116) Thanks to Chris Lamb Thanks and regards, pgpRpsLNj7csx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Questing about packaging Julius, an open source re-implementation of Caesar III
Hi!, I'm interested in packaging Julius [0], an open source re-implementation of Caesar III. As it requires the original assets (graphics, sounds, etc) from Caesar 3 to run I want to ask if it should go in contrib archive. Another thing is it seems there's a RFP using the same name [1], what should I do? Thanks in advance! [0] https://github.com/bvschaik/julius [1] https://bugs.debian.org/506606 pgp0JCxxFVEax.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#942462: RFS: pgn2web/0.4-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pgn2web": * Package name: pgn2web Version : 0.4-3 Upstream Author : William Hoggarth * URL : http://pgn2web.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : web It builds those binary packages: pgn2web - convert PGN chess game files into webpages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pgn2web Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pgn2web/pgn2web_0.4-3.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/pgn2web Changes since the last upload: pgn2web (0.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 4.4.1. No changes required. - Build-depend on libwxgtk3.0-gtk3-dev (Closes: #933451) - Upgrade to debhelper compat 12. - Change maintainer's e-mail. * debian/patches: - makefile.patch: Replace hardcoded compiler (Closes: #923106) Thanks to Helmut Grohne. -- Jose G. López Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:13:27 +0200 Thanks and regards, pgpKq_CeJ7lzf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#933363: RFS: scid/1:4.7.0+dfsg1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scid" * Package name: scid Version : 1:4.7.0+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : Fulvio Benini * URL : http://scid.sf.net * License : GPL-2.0 Section : games It builds those binary packages: scid - chess database with play and training functionality scid-data - data files for scid, the chess database application To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/scid Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scid/scid_4.7.0+dfsg1-1.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/scid Changes since the last upload: scid (1:4.7.0+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version. * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 4.4.0. No changes required. - Change maintainer's e-mail. - Mark scid-data as Multi-Arch: foreign. * debian/copyright: - Update upstream copyright year and my e-mail. * debian/patches: - 02_uninitialized-memory-access.patch: Refresh patch as some fixes are applied upstream. - 01_narrowing_conversion.diff, 01_soundfolder.diff: Remove patches applied upstream. - 01_Makefile.conf.diff, 01_tcl_syntax.diff: Refresh patches. * debian/watch: - Use git mode to get new upstream versions. -- Jose G. López Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:57:33 +0200 Regards, pgpQJPn64aoeU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#917876: RFS: ethereal-chess/11.25+ds1-1 [ITP]
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:31:47 +0100 Adam Borowski wrote: > Hi! I'm afraid it fails to build for me: > > gcc -flto -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wl,-z,relro src/*.c -lpthread -lm -lfathom -o > ethereal-chess > src/search.c:34:10: fatal error: tbprobe.h: No such file or directory > #include "tbprobe.h" > ^~~ > Hi Adam, Yeah, sorry, I have changed B-D to libfathom-dev whom provides the missing header file. Re-uploaded to mentors and updated Salsa. Thank you and regards,
Bug#917876: RFS: ethereal-chess/11.25+ds1-1 [ITP]
Hi, Now, as fathom is building correctly [0], this package is looking for a sponsor ;-) Thanks and regards, [0] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fathom
Bug#920471: RFS: fathom/1.0+git.20190120.0439ca-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fathom": * Package name: fathom Version : 1.0+git.20190120.0439ca-1 Upstream Author : Jon Dart * URL : https://github.com/jdart1/Fathom * License : MIT Section : libs It builds those binary packages: fathom - Command-line for probing Syzygy tablebases libfathom-dev - Library for probing Syzygy tablebases (development files) libfathom1 - Library for probing Syzygy tablebases To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fathom Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fathom/fathom_1.0+git.20190120.0439ca-1.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/fathom Changes since the last upload: fathom (1.0+git.20190120.0439ca-1) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/control: - Use debhelper compat version 12. - Change maintainer's e-mail and upstream homepage. * debian/copyright: - Update url source, copyright notices and my e-mail. * debian/rules: - Add -I option to find headers. * debian/watch: - Change upstream git repo. Use Jon Dart's fork. It has some bug fixes and enhancements. -- Jose G. López Fri, 25 Jan 2019 20:39:28 +0100 Using Jon Dart's fork as it has some bug fixes and enhancements. It has a fix for compiling on 32 bits archs. Hope this version fix these building errors: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fathom Thanks and regards, pgp_VL3zbOrfU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: ethereal-chess/11.00+ds1-1 [ITP]
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 10:42:10 +0100 "Jose G. López" wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ethereal-chess": > > ethereal-chess (11.00+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Initial release (Closes: #914598) > > -- Jose G. López Sat, 29 Dec 2018 18:43:59 +0100 > > P.D: It has a build dependency on libfathom1 (ITP #914595). > Hi, I'ts not suitable for uploading to the archive at the moment. I'm triyng to fix building errors in fathom [0]. Regards, [0] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fathom
Bug#919701: RFS: scid/1:4.6.4+dfsg1-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scid" * Package name: scid Version : 1:4.6.4+dfsg1-3 Upstream Author : Fulvio Benini * URL : http://scid.sf.net * License : GPL-2.0 Section : games It builds those binary packages: scid - chess database with play and training functionality scid-data - data files for scid, the chess database application To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/scid Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scid/scid_4.6.4+dfsg1-3.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/scid Changes since the last upload: scid (1:4.6.4+dfsg1-3) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/patches: - Import patch to avoid uninitialized memory access. Thanks to Bernhard Übelacker for patch. * debian/rules: - Remove unnecessary dh argument. * debian/copyright: - Use https and update copyright year. * debian/control: - Upgrade to debhelper compat 12. - Use priority 'optional'. - Bump to Standards-Version 4.3.0 and set Vcs* fields to Salsa. * debian/changelog: - Remove trailing whitespaces. * Remove menu as menu system is deprecated (Policy >= 3.9.8) -- Jose G. López Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:03:52 +0100 Regards, pgpZV7LTSuoDy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#917875: closing RFS: fathom/1.0-1 [ITP]
On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 22:31:24 + Bart Martens wrote: > Package fathom version 1.0-1 is in NEW now, > and the package at mentors is not newer (2018-12-31) than the package in NEW > (2018-12-31), > so there is currently no package to sponsor. > > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/fathom_1.0-1.html > https://mentors.debian.net/package/fathom > > Please remove the package from mentors or mark it "needs sponsor = no". > If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW, > then you can upload an updated package to mentors > and feel free to reopen this RFS 917875 or open a new RFS. It is removed. Thanks!
Bug#917875: RFS: fathom/1.0-1 [ITP]
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 20:06:11 +0100 Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > Uploaded. > > Please, tag the release on your repo. Tagged. > > Also, for next time, as a nitpicking comment, think about updating the > d/changelog release date when you change files in debian/ directory. > > Cheers! > I'll do it. Did it right now to ethereal-chess package. Thank you very much!
Bug#917875: RFS: fathom/1.0-1 [ITP]
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 23:50:46 +0100 Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Hi, > > I suggest you rename your branch "master" to "upstream". Hi Pierre, Done it. Following DEP-14 layout. > > Regardless: > > * d/patches: why changing the .c file instead of adding -I to gcc calls? > Yea, my fault. Fixed up. All changes are pushed to https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/fathom Do I need to re-upload the package to mentors? Thank you and happy new year to all!
Bug#917875: RFS: fathom/1.0-1 [ITP]
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 10:35:55 +0100 "Jose G. López" wrote: > P.D: It's a requirement for ethereal-chess (ITP #914595) and surely for other > chess engines that are embedding this probe tool. > Sorry ITP actually is 914598. Regards,
Bug#917876: RFS: ethereal-chess/11.00+ds1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ethereal-chess": * Package name: ethereal-chess Version : 11.00+ds1-1 Upstream Author : Andrew Grant * URL : https://github.com/AndyGrant/Ethereal * License : GPL-3.0+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: ethereal-chess - UCI-compliant chess engine To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ethereal-chess Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ethereal-chess/ethereal-chess_11.00+ds1-1.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/ethereal-chess Changes since the last upload: ethereal-chess (11.00+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial release (Closes: #914598) -- Jose G. López Sat, 29 Dec 2018 18:43:59 +0100 P.D: It has a build dependency on libfathom1 (ITP #914595). Thanks and regards, pgpQ72vNRQ0ms.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#917875: RFS: fathom/1.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fathom": * Package name: fathom Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : basil * URL : https://github.com/basil00/Fathom * License : MIT Section : libs It builds those binary packages: fathom - Command-line for probing Syzygy tablebases libfathom-dev - Library for probing Syzygy tablebases (development files) libfathom1 - Library for probing Syzygy tablebases To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fathom Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fathom/fathom_1.0-1.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/fathom Changes since the last upload: fathom (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial release (Closes: #914595) -- Jose G. López Mon, 31 Dec 2018 10:02:17 +0100 P.D: It's a requirement for ethereal-chess (ITP #914595) and surely for other chess engines that are embedding this probe tool. Thanks and regards, pgpaR2ZXxAtKx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Question about a file inside debian directory
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:37:27 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:59:16AM +0100, Jose G. López wrote: > > Well my problem is that upstream's software is intended to build just > > an executable and I'm building a shared library. > This is even more important problem. Are you sure you can do it properly? I will contact upstream to see if she is insterested in autotoolize her software and give her a hand with that. In the meantime, I think the package is building and working properly; I did some tests linking litle programs with the library, executing, ... > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:50:07 +0100 > Adam Borowski wrote: > There's also a third way: as debian/rules is a makefile, it can do whatever > you want. Patching the upstream Makefile is good when you want to amend or > change some issue, not when you replace it completely. Thank you Adam, I followed your advice and moved all building instructions to debian/rules. Source package is uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fathom dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fathom/fathom_1.0-1.dsc And the repository at: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/fathom.git If someone can review it and believes it's correct, I will open an RFS bug. Regards, pgpZaJys7LPTf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Question about a file inside debian directory
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:43:26 + Mo Zhou wrote: > Hi Jose, > > If you think writting a new makefile is better than patching the > upstream build system, please go ahead. However, having to write a > makefiles by oneself often signifies problematic upstream. > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 15:40:17 +0500 > Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > The ideal thing is to fix the problem in the upstream, not locally. For > that you usually need to make a patch first. > What problem are you solving in this way? Thanks Mo, Andrey! Well my problem is that upstream's software is intended to build just an executable and I'm building a shared library. It's a requirement as I plan to package some current chess engines who are embedding this probe tool. Regards, pgpRmLsepTphq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Question about a file inside debian directory
Dear mentors, Is it permitted by the Debian Policy to have a personalized makefile inside debian directory and call it from rules file? Or I should patch the upstream's makefile completly? I'm packaging fathom[0][1] and can't find an answer. Thanks and sorry if the answer is obvious. Regards, [0] Bug#915242: fathom -- Library for probing Syzygy tablebases [ITP] [1] https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/fathom.git (test branch) pgptXh8hjEAPF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#894307: RFS: pgn2web/0.4-2 [ITA]
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 09:29:02 -0300 Herbert Fortes wrote: > Hi Jose G. López, > > I ran 'blhc --all' and there are some CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS > missing '-fPIE' '-fPIE -pie'. > > Can you please fix them? > Hi Herbert, Fix it. Reuploaded to mentors and pushed to salsa. > > Regards, > Herbert > Thanks! pgpEDIJRdUqmv.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#894307: RFS: pgn2web/0.4-2 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pgn2web": * Package name: pgn2web Version : 0.4-2 Upstream Author : William Hoggarth * URL : http://pgn2web.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : web It builds those binary packages: pgn2web - convert PGN chess game files into webpages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pgn2web Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pgn2web/pgn2web_0.4-2.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/pgn2web Changes since the last upload: pgn2web (0.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Set myself as Maintainer (Closes: #835308) * debian/compat: Upgrade to version 11. * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 4.1.3. No changes required. - Use optional priority. - Add Vcs-* fields pointing to Salsa. * debian/copyright: Convert to Machine-readable format. * debian/patches: - compilation.patch: Add to fix compilation errors. - makefile.patch: Add to enable hardening flags. - install-location.patch: Move install location fix to makefile.patch. * debian/rules: Enable hardening flags and use verbose mode. * debian/watch: Add to track upstream releases. * Add and install a desktop file. -- Jose G. López Wed, 28 Mar 2018 19:08:10 +0200 Thanks and regards, pgpUuz1GFybCv.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#890203: RFS: gigalomania/1.0-1 [ITP]
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:08:58 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:34 AM, Jose G. López wrote: > > > The package got rejected because I forgot to reference a copy of TinyXML. > > Please ask upstream to remove the copy from their VCS and tarballs and > depend on it instead. If that does not work, please either repack the > tarball or ensure that the copy is removed before dh_auto_configure is > run. Thanks Paul, I contacted upstream but answered that wasn't posible as it's needed for other platforms. I repacked the upstream tarball and removed also stuff not necessary in Debian. Uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gigalomania And pushed changes on repo: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/gigalomania Hope this time could be uploaded to the archive. Regards, pgp5a0hNIgdRk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#890203: RFS: gigalomania/1.0-1 [ITP]
On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 21:51:01 +0100 "Jose G. López" wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gigalomania": > > * Package name: gigalomania > Version : 1.0-1 > Upstream Author : Mark Harman > * URL : http://gigalomania.sourceforge.net > * License : GPL-2+, GPL-3+, CC0, CC BY 3.0, CC BY SA 3.0 and LGPL-2.1 > Section : games > Hi, The package got rejected because I forgot to reference a copy of TinyXML. I did it and pushed changes, hope this time is ok. Should I open another RFS or can I reuse this one? Regards, pgpl4Se_tS4o_.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Lintian warnings converting copyright to machine-readable
Hi, On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 21:16:47 +1100 Ben Finney wrote: > That specification would mean the recipient can choose to redistribute > the work under *any* of those license conditions. I think that is not > what you mean to specify. Absolutely right, it's a combining work and should be used "and". On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 14:47:52 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > The License field is "Formatted text, with synopsis". Only the first line is > the list of license names. In other words, don't wrap it. > On an unrelated note, a lot of your URLs contain U+200B ZERO WIDTH SPACE > characters, is that intended? Fix it. I copied the URLs from the orignial upstream page (html) and formatted them using line breaks. Could it be because of this? Thank you! pgpJr3NYkYX1u.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#890203: RFS: gigalomania/1.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gigalomania": * Package name: gigalomania Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Mark Harman * URL : http://gigalomania.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2+, GPL-3+, CC0, CC BY 3.0, CC BY SA 3.0 and LGPL-2.1 Section : games It builds those binary packages: gigalomania - Mega-Lo-Mania-like god game gigalomania-data - Mega-Lo-Mania-like god game (data files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gigalomania Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gigalomania/gigalomania_1.0-1.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/gigalomania Changes since the last upload: gigalomania (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial release. (Closes: #865784) P.D: First try got rejected because some files were licensed under CC BY(-SA) 2.0; upstream has fixed that in this new version. Thanks and regards, pgpfICl8eusNV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Lintian warnings converting copyright to machine-readable
Hello!, I'm packaging gigalomania and want to convert copyright to machine-readable format but I'm having lintian warnings I don't know how to fix. The original copyright is here: http://gigalomania.sourceforge.net/#licences There are a lot of images with different authors embedded into single files. For that reason I had to write a lot of license names on the License field. Every license name is described in a stand-alone License paragraph at the end of the copyright file. Ex: License: CC-BY-SA-3.0 or GPL-2.0-only or GPL-3.0-or-later or CC0-1.0 or CC-BY-3.0 or LGPL-2.1-or-later or GPL-2.0-or-later I have saw this in other source packages, not so exaggerated, of course. I've uploaded the copyright here: https://paste.debian.net/plain/1009615 The lintian's output: W: gigalomania source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 699) W: gigalomania source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 1021) W: gigalomania source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 1026) W: gigalomania source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique ... use --no-tag-display-limit to see all (or pipe to a file/program) W: gigalomania source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-3.0-or-later (paragraph at line 232) W: gigalomania source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2.0-only (paragraph at line 324) W: gigalomania source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright cc0-1.0 (paragraph at line 359) W: gigalomania source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright ... use --no-tag-display-limit to see all (or pipe to a file/program) Could you point me where the problem is? Regards and thanks in advance. pgpkQQR7qLnnB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#883947: RFS: gringotts/1.2.10-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gringotts" * Package name: gringotts Version : 1.2.10-3 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish * URL : http://gringotts.shlomifish.org * License : GPL-3+ Section : utils It builds those binary packages: gringotts - secure password and data storage manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gringotts Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gringotts/gringotts_1.2.10-3.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://gitlab.com/deb-pkg/gringotts Changes since the last upload: * debian/copyright: - Update Source url and copyright year for debian files. * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 4.1.2. + Remove menu as menu system is deprecated (Policy >= 3.9.8). - Refresh homepage and development urls. - Remove Conflicts clause. Not needed anymore. * debian/watch: - Rewrite to look at Github and update to version 4 format. Regards, pgpCKnCYKuvDJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#883945: RFS: libgringotts/1:1.2.1-16
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgringotts" * Package name: libgringotts Version : 1:1.2.1-16 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish * URL : http://gringotts.shlomifish.org * License : GPL-3+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libgringotts-dev - development files for the gringotts data encapsulation library libgringotts2 - gringotts data encapsulation and encryption library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgringotts Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgringotts/libgringotts_1.2.1-16.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://gitlab.com/deb-pkg/libgringotts Changes since the last upload: * debian/compat: update to 10. * debian/copyright: - Update Source url and copyright year for debian files. * debian/control: - Update to debhelper 10. - Bump to Standards-Version 4.1.2. No changes required. - Drop unnecessary dh-autoreconf build-dependency. - Refresh homepage and development urls. * debian/watch: - Rewrite to look at Github and update to version 4 format. * debian/rules: - Remove '--parallel' and '--with autoreconf' as they are enabled by default in compat level 10. Regards, pgp06guvMpvQY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#883942: RFS: medit/1.2.0-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "medit" * Package name: medit Version : 1.2.0-3 Upstream Author : Yevgen Muntyan * URL : http://mooedit.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2.0, LGPL-2.1 Section : editors It builds those binary packages: medit - Useful programming and around-programming text editor To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/medit Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/medit/medit_1.2.0-3.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://gitlab.com/deb-pkg/medit Changes since the last upload: * debian/compat: update to 10. * debian/control: - Update to debhelper 10. Remove --parallel option. - Bump to Standards-Version 4.1.2. + Remove menu as menu system is deprecated (Policy >= 3.9.8) - Drop unnecessary dh-autoreconf build-dependency. - Drop python-cairo-dev build-dependency. Thanks to Laurent Bigonville (Closes: #882221). * debian/copyright: - Convert to Machine-readable format. * debian/rules: - Use all hardening flags (DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all). - Remove '--with autoreconf' option and don't delete *.pyc file. Regards, pgp9vBEj3aV1h.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#866783: RFS: gigalomania/0.28+git.20170219.g08f4811-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gigalomania": * Package name: gigalomania Version : 0.28+git.20170219.g08f4811-1 Upstream Author : Mark Harman * URL : http://gigalomania.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2+, CC0, CC BY 3.0 and zlib License Section : games It builds those binary packages: gigalomania - Mega-Lo-Mania-like god game gigalomania-data - Mega-Lo-Mania-like god game (data files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gigalomania Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gigalomania/gigalomania_0.28+git.20170219.g08f4811-1.dsc Package development is on the following repo: https://gitlab.com/deb-pkg/gigalomania Changes since the last upload: gigalomania (0.28+git.20170219.g08f4811-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial release. (Closes: #865784) Regards, pgpH8r22MFIU2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#836215: RFS: phalanx/25-1 [ITA]
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:55:36 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > you might even consider fixing the actual RC bug without a new upstream > release, > let the package migrate, and upload the new version (crippled) in experimental > or later in unstable. Hi Gianfranco, All right, I prefer to fix and improve the actual version and not trim useful features that I as a user, would like to have. I've uploaded the new debian revision to mentors[0]. To keep the previous work I have created a new branch (debian/sid) where I cherry-picked changes. Thanks for your help and suggestions! [0]https://mentors.debian.net/package/phalanx [1]https://gitlab.com/deb-pkg/phalanx/tree/debian/sid pgpsXbe1alMtI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#836215: RFS: phalanx/25-1 [ITA]
Hi Gianfranco, Thanks for reviwing! I must say I've addressed most of your points but testing the new version (25), I've found that it doesn't work as expected in Scid. Scid has a feature to play versus Phalanx (tactical game) but it needs a special version. The package in sid works well while new version only works if you choose the option to play a specific opening. Apart from that, the engine works well both in scid (analyzing) and xboard (analyzing and playing with). I've tried to figure out the changes done to phalanx-scid engine but I don't come by with a solution. So don't know if it's better to fix and improve the version in sid (22+d051004) while asking Scid upstream to import the new version of Phalanx and knowing what changes need to be tweaked. What do you think? Regards, pgp3RgkkHVa86.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#831792: RFS: scid/1:4.6.4+dfsg1-1
> Hi, can you please have a look at the build failures? > > thanks > > > g++ -MMD -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/«BUILDDIR»/scid-4.6.4+dfsg1=. -fPIE > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3 -march=native -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 > -pthread -Wall -DZLIB -I/usr/include/tk -o src/sortcache.o -c > src/sortcache.cpp > g++ -MMD -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/«BUILDDIR»/scid-4.6.4+dfsg1=. -fPIE > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3 -march=native -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 > -pthread -Wall -DZLIB -I/usr/include/tk -o src/pgnparse.o -c > src/pgnparse.cpp > g++ -MMD -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/«BUILDDIR»/scid-4.6.4+dfsg1=. -fPIE > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3 -march=native -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 > -pthread -Wall -DZLIB -I/usr/include/tk -o src/engine.o -c src/engine.cpp > src/engine.cpp: In member function 'int Engine::Think(MoveList*)': > src/engine.cpp:1482:51: warning: suggest parentheses around '&&' within '||' > [-Wparentheses] > if (mlist->Size() <= depth || depth >= 5 && IsMatingScore (bestScore)) { > break; } > ^ > g++ -MMD -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/«BUILDDIR»/scid-4.6.4+dfsg1=. -fPIE > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3 -march=native -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 > -pthread -Wall -DZLIB -I/usr/include/tk -o src/sc_base.o -c src/sc_base.cpp > In file included from src/gfile.h:26:0, > from src/scidbase.h:25, > from src/sc_base.cpp:21: > src/fastgame.h: In static member function 'static squareT > FastGame::decodeKing(squareT, byte)': > src/fastgame.h:436:63: error: narrowing conversion of '-9' from 'int' to > 'char' inside { } [-Wnarrowing] > static const char sqdiff[] = { 0, -9, -8, -7, -1, 1, 7, 8, 9}; > ^ > src/fastgame.h:436:63: error: narrowing conversion of '-8' from 'int' to > 'char' inside { } [-Wnarrowing] > src/fastgame.h:436:63: error: narrowing conversion of '-7' from 'int' to > 'char' inside { } [-Wnarrowing] > src/fastgame.h:436:63: error: narrowing conversion of '-1' from 'int' to > 'char' inside { } [-Wnarrowing] > src/fastgame.h: In static member function 'static squareT > FastGame::decodeKnight(squareT, byte)': > src/fastgame.h:450:91: error: narrowing conversion of '-17' from 'int' to > 'char' inside { } [-Wnarrowing] > static const char sqdiff[] = { 0, -17, -15, -10, -6, 6, 10, 15, 17, 0, 0, 0, > 0, 0, 0, 0 }; > ^ > src/fastgame.h:450:91: error: narrowing conversion of '-15' from 'int' to > 'char' inside { } [-Wnarrowing] > src/fastgame.h:450:91: error: narrowing conversion of '-10' from 'int' to > 'char' inside { } [-Wnarrowing] > src/fastgame.h:450:91: error: narrowing conversion of '-6' from 'int' to > 'char' inside { } [-Wnarrowing] > Makefile:334: recipe for target 'src/sc_base.o' failed Hi Gianfranco, I've uploaded a new revision to mentors[0] that fixes errors on building for some architectures. Thanks again! Regards, [0]https://mentors.debian.net/package/scid pgpnFeGmljER2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#831792: RFS: scid/1:4.6.4+dfsg1-1
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:30:38 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi Gianfranco, > new review: > 1) please convert the versioning into 1:4.6.2-1 and remove the NMU syntax. > and add a "Set myself as Maintainer" Versioning is 1:4.6.4+dfsg1-1 due to repackaging of upstream sources. I've seen other examples using this versioning nomenclature. > > 2) missing newline between last entry and your signature > to make it DFSG compliant. > -- Jose G. López Mon, 08 Aug 2016 11:23:07 +0200 Fixed. > > 3) copyrights missing > grep -i copyright . -R |grep -v Fulv |grep -v Shane |grep -vi pascal Sorry for this. Completed and hope this time is ok. > > after that we should be *really* good, and I'll put the package in deferred, > to make it reach unstable in 15 days or so > (mia team should orphan the package in the meanwhile). > In case it gets orphaned close the bug with > "set myself as Maintainer (Closes: #) Thanks for advertising scid was orphaned. Added myself as adopter ;-) New revision uploaded to mentors[0], the last one uploaded at 2016-08-26 18:59 I'll have a look to other packages orphaned to see if I can help with them. Thanks and regards, [0]https://mentors.debian.net/package/scid pgpbJi7TYoo_M.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#831792: RFS: scid/1:4.6.2-0.1 [NMU]
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:18:51 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > lets see. > 1) > > The package will be probably orphaned in 10-15 days, so you might want to set > yourself > as Maintainer and adopt it > > 2) > +* Copyright (C) 2013-2015 Fulvio Benini > > > maybe you want also to put copyright file in machine readable format > https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ > Done. > 3) > X: scid source: maybe-not-arch-all-binnmuable scid -> scid-data > > 4) the breaks+replaces can be dropped, since that version is already > available in oldstable > > Breaks: scid (<=1:4.3.0.cvs20110714-2) > Replaces: scid (<=1:4.3.0.cvs20110714-2) > Recommends: scid (>=1:4.3.0.cvs20111216-1) > Dropped. > last thing: > > 4) this hack seems useless now > sed s/x86_64-linux-gnu/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/ configure > configure.sed > chmod 755 configure.sed > ./configure.sed BINDIR="$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/scid/usr/games" \ Deleted too. > > please fix the above and I'll give another review/upload. > > thanks, > > G. Hi Gianfranco, Sorry for this late replay, I've been working on your advices and meanwhile packaging a new released version (4.6.4). You'll see in this new version I had to repack upstream sources to make the package DFSG compliant. Oliver did it with a script (prep.sh); I've used uscan and excluding files in debian/copyright (hope it's correct). It's uploaded to mentors[0]. Thanks and regards, P.D: On mentors, the watch file seems that doesn't work but on my devel machine is working properly ?? [0]https://mentors.debian.net/package/scid pgpgdVz1PK0qZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#831792: RFS: scid/1:4.6.2-0.1 [NMU]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scid": * Package name: scid Version : 4.6.2-0.1 Upstream Author : Fulvio Benini * URL : http://scid.sf.net * License : GPL v2 Section : games It builds those binary packages: scid - chess database with play and training functionality scid-data - data files for scid, the chess database application To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/scid Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scid/scid_4.6.2-0.1.dsc As advised by Gianfranco I've upload the package to mentors. It closes some other bugs not reproducible by the current version and is lintian clean (hope so :-)). Package development is on the following repo: https://gitlab.com/deb-pkg/scid Changes since the last upload: * Non-maintainer upload. * New upstream version. (Closes: #802196) * UCI engine settings works and doesn't show errors. (Closes: #801607) * Game list can be resized and changes total width of the window (Closes: #692300) * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.8. No changes required. - Use tcl and tk default version provided by Debian. - Add libsnack2 (enabling sound) and tclsh to Depends on scid-data package. * debian/rules: - Link with '--as-needed' to fix FTBFS. (Closes: #772432) Thanks to Logan Rosen for patch. - Add hardening flags. - Fix executable permissions on some files. * debian/patches: - tcl_syntax: Add to fix syntax for Tcl/Tk script. - 01_datafolder.diff: Add to use a data dir variable. - 01_soundfolder.diff: Change to use share dir variable. - 01_Makefile.conf.diff: Change to use hardening/linking flags. - 01_configure_tclsh.diff: Remove, tcl default version provides tclsh. - 01_spellcorrection.diff: Remove, source file deleted by upstream. * debian/scid.dirs: Remove scidlet dir, it is not used anymore. * debian/scid.install: Remove copying to scidlet dir. * debian/scid-data.dirs: Add tcl dir as upstream installs it by default * debian/scid-data.install: Copy files to tcl dir. Regards, pgpA2plKblaY5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Packaging new upstream version of scid
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:56:03 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > I did *two* NMU of stockfish for this maintainer, both were new upstream > release, and upstream was making pressure > about updating it. > > So, even if the maintainer is not officially MIA, I guess you can already > open an RFS bug, that I can sponsor if > the following conditions are met: > 1) you bump severity of 802196 to important and explain why the new version > is important to go in unstable > > 2) you fix also 772432 (just apply the patch or check if the new upstream > release fixes that bug) > 3) you try to see how and which bugs are fixed in the new release > 4) you open an RFS bug > > > if the review is good, I'll upload in deferred/15 or somewhere in that > deferred queue. > Thank you Gianfranco, I'll address all of your points and give an answer shortly. > (and I think MIA team might orphan the package in the following days, so I'll > probably ask you > to convert in a Team upload, or Qa upload, or to add yourself as maintainer > of the package) > > > I should admit some changes are useless/out of an NMU scope, so maybe if you > want to wait for him > to step in, or MIA team to orphan the package, I can sponsor even more easily > the package. > I use this package a lot so would be happy maintain it (in a team or individually), even I have no experience in Tcl and Tk :-0 Regards, pgpdANlV2CsYy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Packaging new upstream version of scid
Hello! I have been working on packaging a new version of scid (4.6.2); the version in Debian is outdated (from 2014). I tried to contact Oliver, the actual mantainer, a month ago and haven't received response yet. I tried it twice. I did a NMU and the work can be reviewed on [0]. What should I do? Wait a little bit more or should I fill a RFS bug? Thanks in advance! Regards, [0] https://gitlab.com/deb-pkg/scid.git pgp_CB4kBfgtM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#732234: RFS: libgringotts/1:1.2.1-13
Hi, Could you please help me sponsoring this upload. Because bug 728027 a reverse dependency has been also removed from testing (osmo). Thanks pgpQhYvBKJSuz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#732234: RFS: libgringotts/1:1.2.1-13
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgringotts". * Package name: libgringotts Version : 1:1.2.1-2 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish * URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/gringotts/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libgringotts-dev - development files for the gringotts data encapsulation library libgringotts2 - gringotts data encapsulation and encryption library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgringotts Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgringotts/libgringotts_1.2.1-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: libgringotts (1:1.2.1-13) unstable; urgency=low * Bump Debian version to avoid getting rejected due to a previous version (1.2.1-12). (Closes: #728027). * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5. No changes required. -- Jose G. López Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:37:32 +0100 Thank you and regards, Jose G. López pgpobBMNupxtc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Help with bug #728027
Hi, I was looking for a solution and I saw that ubuntu uses build1 as version's end name [0]. Is this aproach ok in debian? Reading documentation I don't find a proper versioning scheme that fits this problem. Any help would be appreciated. Regards [0] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgringotts pgpjZ6nEuOvyt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Help with bug 722794
Hello, I've received a bug in one of my packages and I want to check with you a proper solution before I make a stupid thing. The bug number is 722794. I've been investigating the problem with linkage and I see it comes from package libmcrypt-dev, more precisly from a script it installs '/usr/bin/libmcrypt-config'. I'm not sure if /usr/lib is a worng place to install libs in a multiarch system but I have amd64 and that library is installed there. The build system do in configure.in: MCRYPT_CFLAGS=`libmcrypt-config --cflags` MCRYPT_LIBS=`libmcrypt-config --libs` And that is translated to: libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c libgrg_tmp.c -fPIE -o libgrg_tmp.o >/dev/null 2>&1 /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -version-info 2:7:0 -fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o libgringotts.la -rpath /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu libgrg_crypt.lo libgrg_structs.lo libgrg_utils.lo libgrg_tmp.lo -lz -lbz2 -L/usr/lib -lmcrypt -lmhash -lm libtool: link: gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/libgrg_crypt.o .libs/libgrg_structs.o .libs/libgrg_utils.o .libs/libgrg_tmp.o -lz -lbz2 -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libmcrypt.so -lmhash -lm -O2 -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgringotts.so.2 -o .libs/libgringotts.so.2.0.7 So this line seems to be a problem '-L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libmcrypt.so' So my questions are, is it ok to install by hand (admin) a lib into /usr/lib as YunQiang Su says? Can someone try this on a non official or different port? And sorry if I didn't explain myself ok, this is my first filled bug ;-) Any help would be appreciated. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#708284: RFS: libgringotts/1:1.2.1-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgringotts". * Package name: libgringotts Version : 1:1.2.1-2 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish * URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/gringotts/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libgringotts-dev - development files for the gringotts data encapsulation library libgringotts2 - gringotts data encapsulation and encryption library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgringotts Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgringotts/libgringotts_1.2.1-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: libgringotts (1:1.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: - Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4. No changes required. - Update debhelper to 9. - Add Multi-Arch support. * debian/rules: - Add hardening flags and clean deprecated code. - Add '--parallel' compilation. * debian/*.install files adapted to use Multi-Arch paths. * Add 00_fix_pkgconfig_pc_file.patch to fix paths for Multi-Arch. * Add doc-base control file to register documentation with doc-base. * Upgrade upstream's GPL version to be compatible with debian packaging. -- Jose G. López Tue, 14 May 2013 20:30:59 +0200 Thank you and regards, Jose G. López signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#695366: RFS: gringotts/1.2.10-1
Hi, I've uploaded a new package to mentors. Could someone review and upload it for me, please. As I say at the beginning of the bug, the actual source package in unstable builds duplicated binaries: libgringotts-dev, libgringotts2. These are provided in libgringotts already. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gringotts Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gringotts/gringotts_1.2.10-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: gringotts (1.2.10-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Move to source version 3.0 (quilt). * Split libgringotts from gringotts source package again. It's an independent library and could be useful in other software. * debian/compat: update to 9. * debian/control: - Update to debhelper 9. - Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.4. No changes required. - Add dh-autoreconf (build system too old) and libgringotts-dev to Build-Depends because of split mentioned above. - Change Vcs-* fields to point where development is done. * debian/copyright: rewrite to machine-readable format. * debian/rules: rewrite to get rid of unnecessary dependencies and add hardening flags. * Fix the location of desktop file. Updated to current standards and remove empty TryExec and X-GNOME-DocPath key. * Call xdg-open or try another options to open README and FAQ menu items (Closes: #639579). * Delete debian/README.Debian due to merge in README from upstream. Changed references in debian/gringotts.NEWS to this one. * Add doc-base control file to register FAQ document with doc-base. * Upgrade upstream's GPL version to be compatible with debian packaging. -- Jose G. López Tue, 07 May 2013 22:24:49 +0200 Thank you and regards, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: retitle WNPP bug
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Bartosz Feński wrote: > W dniu 06.03.2013 17:21, Alfonso Sabato Siciliano pisze: >> Ok, it is been updated >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652580 >> ..."ITP: beret -- A 2d puzzle platformer game" >> >> but in http://wnpp.debian.net/ "beret" is still RFP > Hi Alfonso, official site is: bugs.debian.org/wnpp as Bartosz says Regards, -- "Sólo aquellos que nada esperan del azar son dueños del destino." Matthew Arnold (1822-1888) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caaksuehsmnt_s1ug-awwbz4usao-kgzt8u3p8pxao97rqtg...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#701668: RFS: medit/1.1.1-1 [ITA] -- Useful programming and around-programming text editor
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "medit" * Package name: medit Version : 1.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Yevgen Muntyan Daniel Poelzleithner * URL : http://mooedit.sourceforge.net/ * License : GNU Lesser General Public License Section : editors It builds those binary packages: medit - Useful programming and around-programming text editor To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/medit Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/medit/medit_1.1.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: medit (1.1.1-1) experimental; urgency=low * New maintainer (Closes: #575203). * New upstream release. * debian/compat: update to 9. * debian/control: - Update to debhelper 9. - Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.4. No changes required. - Add dh-autoreconf to Build-Depends to update the build system. * debian/rules: - Add '--parallel' compilation. - Rewrite to get rid of unnecessary dependencies and add hardening flags. * Add fix_package_name.patch to change program name from medit-1 to medit. * Add doc-base control files to register documentation with doc-base. * Add a menu file. Regards, Jose G. López signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Package for Seed7
El mar, 05-02-2013 a las 15:10 +0100, Thomas Mertes escribió: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:32:29 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Thomas Mertes wrote: > > > > > I am the developer of the Seed7 programming language and I need help > > > to create a Debian package for Seed7. > > > > Please read these web pages: > > > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ > > http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers > > Okay, I was able to produce a package for Seed7. > Now I have the files > > seed7_20130203.orig.tar.gz > seed7_20130203-1.debian.tar.gz > seed7_20130203-1.dsc > > The lintian result looks okay for me. > I also filed the bug #699811, which requests the seed7 package. > > Where should I put the files, such that some maintainer can > check them in? > Hi Thomas, Point 4 at http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers Regards, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#695366: RFS: gringotts/1.2.10-1
El lun, 07-01-2013 a las 09:55 +0100, Helmut Grohne escribió: > Please hold back new upstream releases from unstable until after the > freeze and target experimental instead. This would be a small step at > speeding up the wheezy release. Seems reasonable. I was worry by duplicities. Changed to target experimental. > If you change an older changelog entry (1.2.10~pre3-2) please explain > why in the current changelog entry. Sorry, unwanted changes. Reverted. > > * Split libgringotts from gringotts source package again. It's an > > independent library and could be useful in other software. > > This sounds even more inappropriate during the freeze. > > > * debian/copyright: rewrite to machine-readable format. > > It is nice to see machine readability get more adoption. However in this > case human readability seems to have suffered. Your license paragraphs > are very short. Specifically they mention "GPL-2+" which suggests the > "or any later version" which is not included in your license paragraph. > Please either drop the "+" or include the "or any later version" for > consistency. > > Indeed without "or any later version" the (binary) package is not > redistributable, because GPL-2 and GPL-3 are incompatible[1]. This is > why I tagged the bug moreinfo. Please remove the tag after fixing this > issue. I have doubts here. I changed to GPL2+ to be compatible but previous package (Wesley's) was released as GPL3 and I'm not sure if I can relicense debian files as GPL2+. Completed the license paragraph, too. > > * debian/rules: rewrite to get rid of unnecessary dependencies and add > > some hardening flags. > > This sounds confusing given that you actually disabled hardening: > > gringotts-1.2.10/debian/rules: > | # Errors compiling with hardening > | #CFLAGS:=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) > > What is the problem with hardening? Maybe it can be resolved? True, a forgotten entry ... At that time I couldn't fix it but today I looked at it more deeply and I have created a patch to allow compile with hardening build flags. > Please clean up the following patch. It contains more TODO-ish stuff. > > gringotts-1.2.10/debian/patches/fix-mkinstalldirs-old-gettext.patch: > | Description: > | TODO: Put a short summary on the line above and replace this paragraph > | with a longer explanation of this change. Complete the meta-information > | with other relevant fields (see below for details). To make it easier, the > | information below has been extracted from the changelog. Adjust it or drop > | it. > | . Done. > The following boilerplate can likely be removed: > > gringotts-1.2.10/debian/rules: > | # Sample debian/rules that uses debhelper. > | # This file was originally written by Joey Hess and Craig Small. > | # As a special exception, when this file is copied by dh-make into a > | # dh-make output file, you may use that output file without restriction. > | # This special exception was added by Craig Small in version 0.37 of > dh-make. Cleaned, too. > Helmut Thank you very much for your comments, they are very welcome. Re-uploaded to mentors. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#695366: RFS: gringotts/1.2.10-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gringotts". The actual source package in unstable builds duplicated binaries: libgringotts-dev, libgringotts2. These are provided in libgringotts already. * Package name: gringotts Version : 1.2.10-1 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish * URL : http://gringotts.berlios.de/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : utils It builds those binary packages: gringotts - secure password and data storage manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gringotts Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gringotts/gringotts_1.2.10-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: gringotts (1.2.10-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Move to source version 3.0 (quilt). * Split libgringotts from gringotts source package again. It's an independent library and could be useful in other software. * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.3. - Add dh-autoreconf (build system too old) and libgringotts-dev to Build-Depends because of split mentioned above. - Change Vcs-* fields to point where development is done. * debian/copyright: rewrite to machine-readable format. * debian/rules: rewrite to get rid of unnecessary dependencies and add some hardening flags. * Fix the location of desktop file. Updated to current standards and remove empty TryExec and X-GNOME-DocPath key. * Call xdg-open or try another options to open README and FAQ menu items (Closes: #639579). * Delete debian/README.Debian due to merge in README from upstream. * Add doc-base control file to register FAQ document with doc-base. Thanks in advance, Jose G. López -- "Sólo aquellos que nada esperan del azar son dueños del destino." Matthew Arnold (1822-1888) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#689219: RFS: libcdk5
El mar, 09-10-2012 a las 16:19 +, Bart Martens escribió: > Hi Jose, > > I had a look at libcdk5 at mentors uploaded there on 2012-10-08 19:09. The > file debian/copyright is not yet complete, see for example include/button.h > with "Copyright 1999, Grant Edwards". The name Grant Edwards is also > mentioned > as an author in man/cdk_traverse.3 and man/cdk_button.3. > > Regards, > > Bart Martens > > Indicated and re-uploaded. How do you get that information if I can ask? I see the copyright from include/* with 'licensecheck -m --copyright include/*'. Maybe with awk? P.D: I sent you yesterday an e-mail asking for gringotts package. Awaiting your reply. Thanks Bart and regards! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#689219: RFS: libcdk5/5.0.20120323-1 [ITA] -- C-based curseswidget library
El mar, 02-10-2012 a las 04:44 -0400, Thomas Dickey escribió: > hmm - mostly correct. The dates are an issue (I keep each file > separately marked according to the last modification). > The most recent years that I have marked in the sources are > 2012, 2011, 2010, and 2009: > [...] Hello Thomas, With that in mind I think it is best to change your copyright years by a range (1999-2012) as GNU Standards suggest, thanks. I've re-uploaded a new version to mentors fixing the copyright and adding a manpage for cdk-config. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#689219: RFS: libcdk5/5.0.20120323-1 [ITA] -- C-based curseswidget library
El lun, 01-10-2012 a las 10:50 +0200, Thomas Dickey escribió: > http://invisible-island.net/cdk/cdk.html#licensing Hello Thomas, Thanks for pointing that. I already read that page before packaging and I think it's correct to use the BSD-4-clause license. You and Mike are marked as copyright authors. Could you, please, review the debian/copyright from here? http://paste.debian.net/plain/195093 That copyright isn't at mentors yet. I prefer to clarify this before uploading again. http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdk5 P.D: Can I ask for help to get rid of those lintian warnings referring to manpages?. I fixed some of them with a patch (will forward upstream) but I can't manage these ones ... Sorry, I'm not proficient with groff. I would greatly appreciate it. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug#689219: RFS: libcdk5/5.0.20120323-1 [ITA] -- C-based curseswidget library
El lun, 01-10-2012 a las 10:50 +0200, Thomas Dickey escribió: > http://invisible-island.net/cdk/cdk.html#licensing Hello Thomas, Thanks for pointing that. I already read that page before packaging and I think it's correct to use the BSD-4-clause license. You and Mike are marked as copyright authors. Could you, please, review the debian/copyright from here? http://paste.debian.net/plain/195093 That copyright isn't at mentors yet. I prefer to clarify this before uploading again. http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdk5 P.D: Can I ask for help to get rid of those lintian warnings referring to manpages?. I fixed some of them with a patch (will forward upstream) but I can't manage these ones ... Sorry, I'm not proficient with groff. I would greatly appreciate it. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug#689219: RFS: libcdk5/5.0.20120323-1 [ITA] -- C-based curseswidget library
El dom, 30-09-2012 a las 21:30 +0200, Bart Martens escribió: > Hi Jose, > > I had a look at libcdk5 at mentors uploaded there on 2012-09-30 12:50. The > file debian/copyright is not yet complete, see for example manlinks.sed. Done (re-uploaded). I've used 'MIT-NCURSES' for license short name following Machine-readable manual and after looking at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License I hope it's ok ... Thanks and regards! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#689219: RFS: libcdk5/5.0.20120323-1 [ITA] -- C-based curses widget library
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcdk5" * Package name: libcdk5 Version : 5.0.20120323-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Dickey * URL : http://invisible-island.net/cdk/ * License : BSD-4-clause Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libcdk5- C-based curses widget library libcdk5-dev - C-based curses widget library (development files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdk5 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libcdk5/libcdk5_5.0.20120323-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: libcdk5 (5.0.20120323-1) unstable; urgency=low * New maintainer (Closes: #570267). * New upstream release (Closes: #520872). * Standards version 3.9.3. * debian/control: - Add Homepage field and remove from packages descriptions. - Remove trailing spaces in packages descriptions. * debian/rules: - Simplify with help of debhelper. - Enable security hardening build flags. * Remove patches applied upstream: - debian/patches/cal_segfault.patch - debian/patches/libcdk5_man_cdk_display_examples_fix.diff * Remove debian/patches/orig_debian_changes.patch. Not needed anymore. * debian/patches/explicitly_link_with_ncurses.patch: use DEP-3 format. * debian/patches/missing_header_examples.patch: fix /demos Makefile.in. * Fix manpages containing a hyphen where a minus sign was intended. Patch fix_hyphen-used-as-minus-sign.patch * Move cdk.h to /usr/include/cdk and remove cdk_test.h from there. Patch header_in_include_and_rm_test_h.patch * debian/copyright: rewrite to machine-readable format. * libcdk5-dev.install: add usr/bin/cdk5-config (Anthony Fok's patch). * Add debian/watch file. Regards, Jose G. López signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts
El 24/07/12 08:09, Bart Martens escribió: > Other sponsors are welcome to review and upload these packages at any time > without talking to me. > For sure. Sorry. >> >> Bart, I made the changes requested in your comments but I'm not sure if >> I have to re-upload the packages bumping a new revision 1.2.10.-2 or I >> keep them on revision -1. > > I suggest to replace gringotts at mentors with the same number 1.2.10-1. > Done. Now we have two versions at mentors with the same version. I thought they would be overwritten ... >> Another doubt is with bug #633167. It belongs to gringotts source >> package but whit the split I can't close it in libgringotts. I think >> we'll have to close it manually, won't we? > > You can simply use "Closes: #633167" in debian/changelog of the package with > the fix. > I can't in gringotts source package where it belongs now. I mention this on libgringotts changelog but don't like to close it automatically. > I see that gringotts 1.2.10~pre3-1 has "Merge libgringotts source package" in > debian/changelog. You seem to be undoing that now. Intentional ? > Yes, it's intentional. I comment this in changelogs and in the first post here. IMHO I think would be better for new software using its functionality. Sorry for the delay I tested the packages again. I don't want to waste your time. Thanks and regards. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts
Arno Töll wrote: > but it certainly won't hurt. Not too many people care about that flag > (you know, even less than about RFS bugs). Thanks Arno, but since Bart seems to be reviewing these packages, I suppose he will sponsor them. Bart, I made the changes requested in your comments but I'm not sure if I have to re-upload the packages bumping a new revision 1.2.10.-2 or I keep them on revision -1. Another doubt is with bug #633167. It belongs to gringotts source package but whit the split I can't close it in libgringotts. I think we'll have to close it manually, won't we? Sorry for the hassle ... Regards. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts
El 23/07/12 17:23, Bart Martens escribió: > I suggest to open an ITA briefly stating that he agreed. > >> I can upload the packages to mentors for >> review but I prefer to wait for instructions. > > I suggest to proceed without waiting. > > Regards, > > Bart Martens Thanks Bart, I did as you say but I see the ITA bug should have been sent to previous RFA, I'm sorry, now I read and understand clearly (> The procedures for closing these bugs are as follows) from http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp Should I send also a RFS bug for requesting a sponsor?, I'm very newbie, sorry ... Regards. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#682567: ITA: gringotts -- secure password and data storage manager
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Hi, I would like to take over maintainership of gringotts. I have contacted Wesley J. Landaker, the actual maintainer, and I have his approval. He kindly pointed out the steps to follow the adoption. I've uploaded the packages to mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgringotts http://mentors.debian.net/package/gringotts Regards. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Taking over maintainership of gringotts
Hello, I would like to take over maintainership of gringotts. I contacted Wesley J. Landaker last week and sent him an updated packages (closing some bugs and upgrading upstream version). Here is a resume of changes I've made: libgringotts - - Call dh_autoreconf to update the build system files making it more portable and getting rid of a lintian warning about 'ancient-libtool' - Update Standards-Version to 3.9.3 - Stop shipping libgringotts.la file closing (#633167) gringotts - - Standards version 3.9.3 - Fix the location of desktop file. Updated to current standards and remove empty TryExec and X-GNOME-DocPath key - Call xdg-open to open README and FAQ menu items (closes: #639579) I have to say I've split the packages again since some software is using libgringotts (osmo for example) and I think it would be easier to package new upstream versions this way. Moreover, the functionality is well differentiated. He told me to contact here and try to find a sponsor. I have read 'intro-maintainers' from mentors.debian.net and I'm not sure if I have to send an ITA against wnpp ... I can upload the packages to mentors for review but I prefer to wait for instructions. Thanks in advance. Regards, signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature