Re: Bug#1069083: RFS: runit-services/0.7.2 -- UNIX init scheme with service supervision (services)
Hi Tobias, hi Lorenzo. Tobias, thanks for looking into this sponsoring request! I appreciate it. Tobias Frost - 11.05.24, 10:24:31 CEST: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:39:58AM +0200, Lorenzo wrote: > > Control: block -1 by 1067525 > > > > this fix need to go to unstable because elogind 255.4.1 is already > > there, but runit-services depends on runit > 2.1.2-56 (unstable is at > > 2.1.2-54) so 1067525 needs to be uploaded first or together with this > > one, otherwise runit-services is not installable > > Ok, just saw that one. > Please note that this fact must be stated in d/changelog, something like > "Upload to unstable." FWIW I run runit 2.1.2-59 and runit-services together with elogind 255.5-2 on two Devuan Ceres systems with KDE's Plasma desktop. One I had patched manually, but I made sure the package version of the run dir for elogind was installed after the upgrade. The other one was upgraded regularly from elogind 252 and older runit / runit-services packages. Runsvdir starts elogind correctly from the new path. I also reviewed the changes to the package for the updated path for elogind and I think they are correct. I am certainly no expert with runit, but as I contributed zcfan service dir at least I know something. Devuan uses the upstream packages for runit, runit-services, dash, bash so I expect that runit-services 0.7.2 will work just fine on Debian, too. It would unbreak running elogind for runit users that did not patch their systems manually already. I bet most of them did by now, as many desktop environments do not work well, if at all, without some systemd-logind replacement. And the timeouts with login into a TTY or SSH session without some systemd-logind replacement are quite annoying as well. Sure we are still talking about a (small) minority of Debian users here. Hope this helps regarding the review of the package and the sponsoring. In case any further changes need to be tested before upload, I am willing to do that. Best, -- Martin
Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys
Hello Eriberto and Andrey, (KMail offered my signing the message, as your mail has been signed, I switched it off, cause Exchange creates a mess out of signed messages. It attached it as a new message inside a message. Will use signing on critical mails. Also on the long signature I currently have no influence on.) Am Dienstag, 23. September 2014, 00:43:25 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:04:37PM -0300, Eriberto wrote: - Your year as packager should be 2013. What do you mean by that? I already have Files: debian/* Copyright: 2013-2014 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de License: GPL-3+ Anything else needed? Sorry for my mistake. As the package in new in Debian, the packaging year must be 2014. This is wrong. Andrey, Not wrong. The package is in first upload. 2014. Can you explain how is this related to copyright years for work done prior to uploading? Please, don't interfer in my revision without a strong motive. I think pointing at errors when someone tells others to do wrong things is quite important. So what is it now, and why? :) The initial package exists since 2013. So is it the date when I did the initial packaging? Then its 2013. Is it the date where the package may get uploaded, then it may be 2014 or 2015. Or is it, as would make most sense to me the years I actually worked on the packaging, then its 2013-2014 as I have it currently. I don't see any clear guidelines in: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile While 4.2 in new maintainer guide has a date range in the example: 13 Files: debian/* 14 Copyright: 1998-2010 Josip Rodin joy...@debian.org 15 License: GPL-2+ https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.de.html#copyright So right now I do not see any evidence for which variant is right, i.e. policy conforming. Ciao, Martin -- Martin Steigerwald | Consultant / Trainer teamix GmbH Südwestpark 43 90449 Nürnberg Tel.: +49 911 30999 55 | Fax: +49 911 30999 99 mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de | web: http://www.teamix.de | blog: http://blog.teamix.de Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 | Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller **Nicht verpassen: Die teamix Wissenstage im Herbst - JETZT ANMELDEN** 21.10. Nürnberg | 22.10. Mainz | 23.10. München | 04.11. Bayreuth Anmeldung unter: http://www.teamix.de/teamix/veranstaltungen/wissenstage-herbst-2014/herbst-2014.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2428099.ugLu9jh7Da@mango
Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys
Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2014, 17:47:29 schrieb Eriberto: Hi Martin, Hello Eriberto, About your package, please: 1. Use DH 9 instead DH 8. 2. d/control: - Change Priority from 'extra' to 'optional'. - The Homepage field and VCS point to a site that says 'The project you're trying to access has been archived'. 3. d/copyright: - In header, the field 'Source' is wrong. - The 'AUTHORS' file says: 'Licensed unter GPL-2. See COPYING.'. So, the upstream code is GPL-2, not 2+. Note the word 'unter'. :-) - Your year as packager should be 2013. What do you mean by that? I already have Files: debian/* Copyright: 2013-2014 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de License: GPL-3+ Anything else needed? 4. d/rules: please, remove all comments (from '# -*- makefile' up to 'verbose mode'). 5. You will need update the Homepage address. Can your current homepage allow scans from d/watch file? Did those and re-uploaded. Found my mistake with previous upload, I misordered arguments to dput like in dput -f mentors distkeys_1.0-1_amd64.changes and this uploaded to ftp- master. I asked ftp masters to discard this. Might be good if dput catches this argument misordering, I think I will file a wishlist bug about it. watch file just temporary didn't work as I changed upstream relicensing and forgot to repush upstream/1.0 tag after deleting it. Please review. Thanks, Martin Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-17 6:34 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de: tags 712787 -moreinfo thanks Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014, 09:07:04 schrieb Eriberto Mota: tags 712787 moreinfo thanks Hi Martin, HI Eriberto, You didn't put the ITP number in d/changelog. Did so now. To make easier the review, please, upload your package to mentors.debian.net. Uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/package/distkeys and hanged status to needs a sponsor. Thanks, Martin Thanks, Eriberto 2014-04-22 5:28 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de: ITP finally went through after Don added some additional stripping to the mail parsing. ITP: distkeys -- Distkeys - upload SSH keys to servers and more http://bugs.debian.org/745478 Thanks, ]…} […] -- Martin Steigerwald | Consultant / Trainer teamix GmbH Südwestpark 43 90449 Nürnberg Tel.: +49 911 30999 55 | Fax: +49 911 30999 99 mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de | web: http://www.teamix.de | blog: http://blog.teamix.de Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 | Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller **Nicht verpassen: Die teamix Wissenstage im Herbst - JETZT ANMELDEN** 21.10. Nürnberg | 22.10. Mainz | 23.10. München | 04.11. Bayreuth Anmeldung unter: http://www.teamix.de/teamix/veranstaltungen/wissenstage-herbst-2014/herbst-2014.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1583407.JTC9mMXoNG@mango
Re: Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys
Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 08:52:53 schrieb Eriberto Mota: Hi Martin, Hi Eriberto, 2014-09-17 19:01 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de: Changed to github already in a re-uploaded distkeys package (dput -f). Your package in mentors.d.n is old yet. Do you uploaded the newer version? Don't worry. I will wait you as long as needed. I think I did. Maybe I missed something. Will check when I am back at work. Thanks for your patience. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2301165.ZFiMU16Mf0@merkaba
Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys
tags 712787 -moreinfo thanks Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014, 09:07:04 schrieb Eriberto Mota: tags 712787 moreinfo thanks Hi Martin, HI Eriberto, You didn't put the ITP number in d/changelog. Did so now. To make easier the review, please, upload your package to mentors.debian.net. Uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/package/distkeys and hanged status to needs a sponsor. Thanks, Martin Thanks, Eriberto 2014-04-22 5:28 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de: ITP finally went through after Don added some additional stripping to the mail parsing. ITP: distkeys -- Distkeys - upload SSH keys to servers and more http://bugs.debian.org/745478 Thanks, ]…} -- Martin Steigerwald | Consultant / Trainer teamix GmbH Südwestpark 43 90449 Nürnberg Tel.: +49 911 30999 55 | Fax: +49 911 30999 99 mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de | web: http://www.teamix.de | blog: http://blog.teamix.de Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 | Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1479415.0rlCnxVRUg@mango
Re: Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys
Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2014, 17:47:29 schrieb Eriberto: Hi Martin, Hi Eriberto, About your package, please: 1. Use DH 9 instead DH 8. 2. d/control: - Change Priority from 'extra' to 'optional'. - The Homepage field and VCS point to a site that says 'The project you're trying to access has been archived'. Changed to github already in a re-uploaded distkeys package (dput -f). 3. d/copyright: - In header, the field 'Source' is wrong. - The 'AUTHORS' file says: 'Licensed unter GPL-2. See COPYING.'. So, the upstream code is GPL-2, not 2+. Note the word 'unter'. :-) Hmmm, I see. I think back then I intended GPL-2+, so may change AUTHORS file. - Your year as packager should be 2013. 4. d/rules: please, remove all comments (from '# -*- makefile' up to 'verbose mode'). 5. You will need update the Homepage address. Can your current homepage allow scans from d/watch file? Also added a uscan file. Will come to the other things next week when I am in office again, I think. Thanks for your work. Thanks for your review. Cheers, Eriberto Ciao, Martin 2014-09-17 6:34 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de: tags 712787 -moreinfo thanks Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014, 09:07:04 schrieb Eriberto Mota: tags 712787 moreinfo thanks Hi Martin, HI Eriberto, You didn't put the ITP number in d/changelog. Did so now. To make easier the review, please, upload your package to mentors.debian.net. Uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/package/distkeys and hanged status to needs a sponsor. Thanks, Martin Thanks, Eriberto 2014-04-22 5:28 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de: ITP finally went through after Don added some additional stripping to the mail parsing. ITP: distkeys -- Distkeys - upload SSH keys to servers and more http://bugs.debian.org/745478 Thanks, ]…} -- Martin Steigerwald | Consultant / Trainer teamix GmbH Südwestpark 43 90449 Nürnberg Tel.: +49 911 30999 55 | Fax: +49 911 30999 99 mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de | web: http://www.teamix.de | blog: http://blog.teamix.de Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 | Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller -- Martin SteigerwaldMail: m...@teamix.net Systemadministrator Fon: +49 (0)911 30999-0 team(ix) GmbH Fax: +49 (0)911 30999-99 Süd-West-Patk 35, 90449 Nürnberg, Deutschland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1833129.7U2DByaUPx@merkaba
Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys
ITP finally went through after Don added some additional stripping to the mail parsing. ITP: distkeys -- Distkeys - upload SSH keys to servers and more http://bugs.debian.org/745478 Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald Consultant / Trainer teamix GmbH Südwestpark 43 90449 Nürnberg fon: +49 911 30999 55 fax: +49 911 30999 99 mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de web: http://www.teamix.de blog: http://blog.teamix.de Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller ** Wissenstag Spezial „Datacenter Networking“ – 21.05.2014 ** http://www.teamix.de/spezial -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/4141474.rQYKiFAbix@mango
Bug#712787: Current status of distkeys packaging
Hello! Current status of the packaging is: I finally finished converting distkeys to be a non native package. I used git- buildpackage repo layout with upstream branch for upstream source and master branch for Debian packaging. Package is lintian clean, except for debian/watch file which I consider to be unnecessary in this case (we are upstream and packagers). I think it is ready for an initial review. I filed an ITP bug as well – waiting for bug number, but if filed with Message with no Package: tag cannot be processed while is has Package: wnpp as its first line. I try to get that resolved and post bug number then. Source, including packaging source, is also hosted with Github: https://github.com/teamix/distkeys For now I try to keep both repositories in sync, but I think I will switch VCS to Github prior to any release to Debian. Ciao, Martin (Please excuse long mail signature, it is centrally managed.) -- Martin Steigerwald Consultant / Trainer teamix GmbH Südwestpark 43 90449 Nürnberg fon: +49 911 30999 55 fax: +49 911 30999 99 mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de web: http://www.teamix.de blog: http://blog.teamix.de Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller ** Wissenstag Spezial „Datacenter Networking“ – 21.05.2014 ** http://www.teamix.de/spezial -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1778372.pyd4P6H6Pt@mango
Bug#712787: RFS: distkeys/1.0 -- distribute SSH keys
Hi Eriberto, Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014, 09:40:27 schrieb Eriberto: Ping! Do you still have interest over this package? I already started migrating it to non-native package format on request, but then was quite busy. Why do you ask? Ciao, Martin -- Martin Steigerwald Consultant / Trainer teamix GmbH Südwestpark 43 90449 Nürnberg fon: +49 911 30999 55 fax: +49 911 30999 99 mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de web: http://www.teamix.de blog: http://blog.teamix.de Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller ** Frühjahrswissenstage bei teamix - 25.03.2014 | Frankfurt/Mainz 26.03.2014 | München 27.03.2014 ** http://www.teamix.de/wissenstag -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1726109.RvuyHYgJ2Z@mango
Re: RFS: fio 2.11
Hi! - Ursprüngliche Mail - On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 08:52:47PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:57:41PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: a) Is it worth to switch to xz for this package? b) Is it a good idea to force the compression-level to 9? For a) I think maybe for b) I guess buildd maintainers and maybe even devs of weaker arches might hate you. I've no good idea myself how xz works internally but if I recall the threads on d-d correctly about making xz the default a compression level above 6 was deemed way too much. I think even lower levels were proposed as a Debian default when xz will be the default compression method. xz is already the default. I don't think micromanaging the compressor in every package is a good idea, especially for a regular package without special needs. Setting it on openclipart (big, no gain) or linux-image-dbg (big and highly compressible) is worth the effort, using something non-standard on a random package is not -- and will bring us extra work if some policy changes. So let's not muck with compression settings without a good reason. It seems that Sven has already uploaded the package. Upstream maintainer Jens Axboe told me that he likely releases a fio 2.12 this week, which has some patches merged I currently carry in the package. I suggest that I remove the compression setting then and do another RFS. Would that be okay with you? Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2080132880.851966.1375774803591.javamail.zim...@teamix.de
Re: RFS: fio 2.11
- Ursprüngliche Mail - On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:57:41PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, Okay, should be fine to go now: I'm in general fine with the package. None the less a remark to maybe think about: a) Is it worth to switch to xz for this package? b) Is it a good idea to force the compression-level to 9? I suggest that I remove any custom compression setting for fio 2.12 then, as Adam recommended. Uploaded, thanks Martin. That was quick. Thanks, Sven. Ciao, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1180611696.852078.1375774956426.javamail.zim...@teamix.de
Re: RFS: distkeys/1.0 -- distribute SSH keys
Hello tokkee, hello mentors, - Ursprüngliche Mail - Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, dear Debian ruby team, I am looking for a sponsor for my package distkeys: * Package name: distkeys Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : teamix GmbH * URL : https://www.teamix.org/projects/distkeys * License : GPL-2+ Section : admin It builds those binary packages: distkeys - distribute SSH keys To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://www.teamix.org/projects/distkeys http://people.teamix.net/~ms/debian/new/ Alternatively use: git clone git://oss.teamix.org/distkeys.git Alternatively, download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://people.teamix.net/~ms/debian/new/distkeys_1.0.dsc I have answered the questions related to the use case and how it is different from puppet and other configuration engines. To just distribute some list of public SSH keys to a list of machines even behind firewalls distkeys is the easiest tool I found up to now. It can do a bit more, but that is it basic task. I also addressed the concern that Ruby 1.8 is to be removed and made the script work with Ruby 1.9. I certainly intend to maintain this, as we are using it ourselves. There are even plans to extend it to distribute keys to non OpenSSH machines that can talk SSH. Would somebody be willing to at least review the package? What else can I do to help the process? Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1083418205.852505.1375775767181.javamail.zim...@teamix.de
RFS: fio 2.11
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sven, Michael, tokkee, mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fio: * Package name: fio Version : 2.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Jens Axboe ax...@kernel.dk * URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/fio * License : GPL-2 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: fio - flexible I/O tester To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://packages.qa.debian.org/fio Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://people.teamix.net/~ms/debian/new/fio_2.1.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: fio (2.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Imported Upstream version 2.1.1 * Updated to Standards-Version to 3.9.4, no changes needed. * debian/patches/ftbfs-fix-for-mips-architecture: Dropped. Applied upstream. * debian/patches/makefile-clean-delete-config-log-and-d-files: Delete config.log and *.d files as leaving them behind make repeated dpkg-buildpackage builds fail with: dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, … * debian/patches/manpage-spelling: Fix lintian tag spelling-error-in-manpage. * debian/control: Added build dependency zlib1g-dev as fio can use zlib to compress client/server communication. * Switched to xz compression. Saved almost 37 KiB on binary package. -- Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:15:21 +0200 Regards, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2134348284.843099.1375712748342.javamail.zim...@teamix.de
Re: RFS: fio 2.11
- Ursprüngliche Mail - Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sven, Michael, tokkee, mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fio: Oh, please hold back until further notice: I missed /usr/bin/fio_generate_plots: -: not found http://bugs.debian.org/bug=700580 I thought I provided upstream patch, but seems to be unfixed still, will fix locally for now. Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/894593300.843224.1375713245739.javamail.zim...@teamix.de
Re: RFS: fio 2.11
- Ursprüngliche Mail - - Ursprüngliche Mail - Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sven, Michael, tokkee, mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fio: Oh, please hold back until further notice: I missed /usr/bin/fio_generate_plots: -: not found http://bugs.debian.org/bug=700580 I thought I provided upstream patch, but seems to be unfixed still, will fix locally for now. Okay, should be fine to go now: * debian/patches/fio_generate_plots-gnuplot: Make test for gnuplot work with empty strings (Closes: #700580). Thanks to Hervé Werner for providing bug report and fix. Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/991512525.843686.1375714661157.javamail.zim...@teamix.de
Bug#712787: RFS: distkeys/1.0 -- distribute SSH keys
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, dear Debian ruby team, I am looking for a sponsor for my package distkeys: * Package name: distkeys Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : teamix GmbH * URL : https://www.teamix.org/projects/distkeys * License : GPL-2+ Section : admin It builds those binary packages: distkeys - distribute SSH keys To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://www.teamix.org/projects/distkeys http://people.teamix.net/~ms/debian/new/ Alternatively use: git clone git://oss.teamix.org/distkeys.git Alternatively, download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://people.teamix.net/~ms/debian/new/distkeys_1.0.dsc This is initial packaging and my first packaging of a ruby script. distkeys is a ruby script we use internally to distribute SSH keys to servers. It can use port forwarding to reach servers behind a gateway. It can execute commands or scripts, scp files and run interactive SSH sessions one after another. Currently it only works with Ruby 1.8 (which is mentioned in README). I made this as a native package before I read a FAQ on mentors.debian.net to rather use non-native package in case the software can be useful for other distribution. If really needed I'd try to convert it to a non-native one. But I'd prefer to keep debian directory with upstream sources if possible, cause we are both upstream and packagers. Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201306191559.53857...@teamix.de
Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)
Hi! I updated my fio debian package to 2.0.8 of fio. My usual sponsors Sebastian 'tokkee' Harl and Michael Prokop seem to be missing in action. The package is already in the repository and has been reviewed by both Michael initially and Sebastian for latest 1.x versions. Can somebody review my updates and upload? tokkee, Michael, please yell now should you now have time to sponsor the package. ;) Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/823512795.544625.1340634165486.javamail.r...@teamix.de
Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012 schrieb Sven Hoexter: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, My usual sponsors Sebastian 'tokkee' Harl and Michael Prokop seem to be missing in action. I kinda doubt that, I guess they're just busy as everyone else is. :) Well, yes. Thats what I meant. Sorry for the confusion. Can somebody review my updates and upload? Where could one pick up the package for review? Couldn't find it on mentors.d.n nor a bugreport associated with sponsorship-request. I'd guess you've usually worked through the collab-maint git repo? Yes. Its at: Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/fio.git Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/fio.git All branches are tagged at 2.0.8 - but I didn´t do any more recent changes anyway for now - and ready for gbp-clone. If you wish I can upload package including dsc file somewhere. Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206251840.43729.mar...@lichtvoll.de
Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012 schrieb Sven Hoexter: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: I'd guess you've usually worked through the collab-maint git repo? Short round of nitpicking the wrong way ;) at what I've found in the git repo. 1) I see no point in listing changes from 2.0.7 and that you've undone them with 2.0.8 because they're fixed in 2.0.8 upstream in the debian/changelog. Those back and forth changes are documented in the VCS history. In my opinion that's enough if someone cares, because they never hit the archive anyway. Ok, I will remove those. 2) It's rather non-obvious that you patch the DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS into the upstream makefile instead of debian/rules. Haven't seen that before and I'm not sure what to think of such tactics. Anyway you have to build depend on dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~) because of the makefile snippet you include. I will change that as well. I just didn´t have the idea to use debian/rules for that. Sounds cleaner that way and I do not need an extra patch this way. 3) I'd skip the capital letters in the short description. It's shortened to fio everywhere else and somewhere in the dev-ref it's mentioned that it's not sentence and thus should not start with a capital letter. Fair enough. Rest seems to be ok at a first glance, though that version jump is a bit late in the release cycle. :-/ Well I already tried to get fio 2.0.7 sponsored ;). I am using the 2.0.7 for quite a while already and think it is fine. Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206251857.18441.mar...@lichtvoll.de
Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012, 19:08:34 schrieb Sven Hoexter: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:57:18PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, Rest seems to be ok at a first glance, And another small one I would change to be more generic: debian/copyright: -Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/fio-1.32.tar.gz +Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/ Shouldn´t this field show what has been used for initial packaging? Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206251918.41054...@teamix.de
Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012, 18:42:02 schrieb Sven Hoexter: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: I'd guess you've usually worked through the collab-maint git repo? Short round of nitpicking the wrong way ;) at what I've found in the git repo. [… three nit^W^W^W improvement suggestions …] I implemented the three suggestions and shortened the source URL in debian/copyright. Lintian, compile and run tested. Please have a look again. If you want test fio for yourself a short 4-minute test is in /usr/share/doc/fio/examples/ssd-test. Just adapt directory in the job file. Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206251957.25530...@teamix.de
regarding the code to test from Carl-Valentin Schmitt
I am not subscribed to this list. Hi! I suggest you not to put any more energy into it - in case you didn´t already notice yourself. From what I have seen from Carl-Valentin Schmitt - whether that is his real name or not I do not know - on debian-user-german[1], kernel-testers mailinglist[2] and elsewhere for example about a hack of having a password that is one terabyte long, I do not have the impression that it is reasonable to expect any code from him to do anything useful. I would also be reluctant about the usefulness of his other posts - except for some amusement. At least not based on the posts I have seen from him so far. And it is not that we - quite some experienced debian-user-german readers - didn´t try to teach him some useful stuff about Debian and Linux initially. [1] I think one thread should be enough as an example: e-mail verpasst wegen github http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/2012/02/msg00645.html (in german tough) [2] holy bim-bam ! kernels obviously have no bugs ! http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.kernel-testers/11600 Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202211029.49272.mar...@lichtvoll.de
