Re: ITA: enigma -- A game where you control a marble with

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

any progress on this? cos i am working on a package .. but i do not handle
the libzipios issue that are already addressed in git upstream issue
https://github.com/Enigma-Game/Enigma/issues/25


Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Future of "obsession" package

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

those constants changes irritates , fbautostart seems is just a window
like way to make window managers (that are not desktops environments)
more away of the meaning of.. and always in the future those "little"
changes must be changed again.. why not just let openbox as simple as
possible?

El dom., 15 de nov. de 2020 a la(s) 12:25, Fabien Givors (Debian)
(f+deb...@chezlefab.net) escribió:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 03:03:08PM +0100, Fabien Givors wrote:
> >> However, I found out that there were a sudden (yet relative) rise
> >> in popcon usage: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=obsession
> >> so, there are users…
>
> Le 15/11/2020 à 15:39, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit :
> > That's because openbox now Recommends it.
> Oh, ok, thanks Andrey, this explains that!
>
> >> I see different solutions:
> >>
> >> 1) remove xdg-autostart, recommend fbautostart
> >> 2) remove xdg-autostart, depends on fbautostart, add a wrapper for
> >>  xdg-autostart to fbautostart
> >> 3) find an alternative to obsession-logout and obsession-exit
> >> binaries and replace obsession with a transition package
> >> What are your thoughts about that?
>
> Le 15/11/2020 à 15:29, Mateusz Łukasik a écrit :
> > openbox-menu have or maybe I should use word had the same upstream
> > author as obsession. Now I going to replace with jgmenu (see
> > #882210) and remove openbox-menu from repository.
> >
> > At point 3 I think solution already exists in jgmenu. Second option
> > is find magic exit script in super beauty openbox based distros like
> > BunsenLabs Linux and port it to Debian.
>
> I see, so are you going to remove the Recommends for obsession from
> openbox package and replace it with jgmenu?
>
> And should I just ask for a RM of obsession?
> Or replace it with a transitional package recommending fbautostart and
> jgmenu?
>
>
> PS: I'm on the list
>
> --
> fabien (captnfab on IRC)
>

Bug#956414: +1 we need more away from systemd

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

+1 good work.. please core DD this pacakge need a review! in devuan
works as expected

-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

how can i make parman layout at installer

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

 layout parman at installer, how to made only primary partitions
i want to autosetup partitions in the debian installer but from second
and go always do logical partitions..

i wants only primary due i only will do two partitions or tree! How
can i do that? by example first partition with 40G second with 2G and
lasted with the rest of the disk

there's my present.cfg file:


d-i partman-auto/method string regular
d-i partman/default_filesystem string ext4
d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select atomic
d-i partman/mount_style select uuid
d-i partman-partitioning/confirm_write_new_label boolean true
d-i partman/choose_partition select finish

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Looking for a sponsor

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

what happened with that ?

El jue., 2 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 05:24,  escribió:

>
> Hello everyone,
>
> (TLWR:
> I have worked on my fisrt package, and am looking for a DD/DM to check it
> and eventually sponsor it into unstable.)
>
> Some time ago I had to compile the latest version of Heimadll (
> www.glassechidna.com.au/heimdall/), because the packaged version wasn't
> compatible with my device. I thought it was a good occasion for a first
> contribution to Debian, since it is a simple enough package (2 binaries).
>
> The package is currently maintained by Steve Langasek, but it has not seen
> updates for ~3 years while upstream had a new release ~ 2 years ago, and
> Steve has not answered my messages to the mail address mentioned on his
> packager page, so I thought it okay to bypass him there.
>
> I've gone through the "Debian new maintainer's guide", took what I could
> from Steve's package, and I think I now have a decent package, or at least
> an upgrade from the current one. That being said, there are a few things
> that I am not too sure about, and I certainly made a few errors since this
> is my first package and there was many things I barely understood well
> enough to have it look like it works.
>
> So if someone here has some time and the motivation to go through what I
> did, correct it and maybe sponsor it into unstable, please reply to me so I
> can send you what I did.
>
> Thank you for reading.
>
>
>
>

Re: Is git obligatory?

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

El jue., 30 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 20:37, Albert van der Horst (
alb...@spenarnc.xs4all.nl) escribió:

> Andrey Rahmatullin schreef op 2019-05-30 18:34:
>
> "An ITP relates to packaging a git repo for Debian"

ITP = Intent to packaging what ever are the source,
means its a try to made the packagin..
but not officially until that packagin are in good shape..


>
>
> That I know. The question is if there is a tarball floating around
> somewhere with a program source, can a Debian Developer make it
> into a package or are there additional hard demands placed on
>
in nomadays there's no CVS and internet was not so popular (neither
accesible) ..
so then git, repository are not (was not) the main source of packagin

in nomadays in the first era, internet was not a so popular resource..
and the disks and compat disk was the main resources of distribution..

today the network and internet are the main resource.. but in essence..
maybe in the future that behaviour of make a "oring" will dessapier..
as i know.. ebuils and apk grab directly the sources from the repositories


> the tarball apart from copyright issues.
> (Of course a Debian Developer will not touch a program that he considers
> not to be of sufficient quality, such as rejecting programs without a
> maintainer or such that are not under source control, but that
> is a subjective call.)
>
> Groetjes Albert
>
> --
> Suffering is the prerogative of the strong, the weak -- perish.
> Albert van der Horst
>
>

Bug#902405: why this package was not uploaded to ftp main debain!

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

i dont see any mess in this packagin , please ! upload and make available
for users to test!+



Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

this will change all the way whitin debian can be a unix like!

its enought of systemd intrution!

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2017-08-03 14:24 GMT-04:00 Herminio Hernandez, Jr. <
herminio.hernande...@gmail.com>:

> The Arch Wiki
> 
> shows how you can integrate email notifications with .timer
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Paul Wise  wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Ricardo Fraile wrote:
>>
>> > I like some aspects of the .timer, but I don't know if the change is a
>> good
>> > idea or not at this moment? There are any other package that has changed
>> > from cron to .timer? What is the official recomendation?
>>
>> One significant difference between the two is that all cron output is
>> sent via email, while output from systemd timers is not sent via
>> email. There is no official recommendation here, but other packages
>> have migrated from cron to systemd timers, with fallback to cron when
>> systemd is not running. You can see the apt package for an example and
>> there is also systemd-cron, which can be used to generate systemd
>> timers from cron jobs, the results are placed in the
>> /run/systemd/generator directory at boot time.
>>
>> --
>> bye,
>> pabs
>>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>>
>>
>

Re: Bug#863108: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install game

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

interesting, but seems more complicated in background download more
software rather than reall need! a complete JDK either a JRE!

i need a java runtime to play a game that its native compiled? sound
strange but in any case, user never be know right?

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2017-05-22 10:45 GMT-04:00 Carlos Donizete Froes :

> Sorry for the noise. :-(
>>
>
> It's all right! I'm waiting for a sponsor for my package.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao]
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ - https://wiki.debian.org/coringao
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀  2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF  D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780
>
>

Bug#862114: RFS: xe/0.6.1-1 [ITP] -- simple xargs and apply replacement

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

xe its not an emulator package name?

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2017-05-08 13:13 GMT-04:00 Nicolas Braud-Santoni :

> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package `xe`:
>
> * Package name: xe
>   Version : 0.7.0
>   Upstream Author : Leah Neukirchen 
> * URL : https://github.com/chneukirchen/xe
> * License : CC0
>   Programming Lang: C
>   Description : simple xargs and apply replacement
>
> xe is a new tool for constructing command lines from file listings or
> arguments, which includes the best features of xargs(1) and apply(1).
>
> xe means "execute for every ...".
>
>
> It provides simple(r) parsing of its input, does not invoke a shell by
> default, can execute multiple commands in parallel, ...
>
> Differences with xargs(1) and apply(1) are hilighted on the homepage:
>
>   https://github.com/chneukirchen/xe#benefits
>
>
> I uploaded the (signed) source and binary packages, and build logs, at
>
>   https://nicolas.braud-santoni.eu/tmp/deb/
>
>
> Best,
>
>   nicoo
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 9.0
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: amd64
>  (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored:
> LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>
>

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

2017-04-24 2:32 GMT-04:00 Narcis Garcia :

> I've tried successfully to make a Debian 5 (Lenny) install and use this
> repository:
> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-archive/20160313T130328Z/debian/
> lenny main
>
> All works fine, as I suppose should work for any other version.
>

thanks Narcis.. i already know about it, but i not refers to that point.. i
refer to the archived search interface..


>
>
> __
> I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
> masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service
> administrator should fix this.
> El 23/04/17 a les 14:44, PICCORO McKAY Lenz ha escrit:
> > oh umm this are out of the main threat.. i want to use
> > the archive.debian.net <http://archive.debian.net/> interface, that's
> > all, i only have help from someone to restore, but i refuse that u
> > said.. u are wrong, at the moment o wheeze, ejabbed was many years
> > outdated!!!
> >
> > so if the problemof the out service was the certificate, common, provide
> > a http nude way.. crackers, please, repositories are signed! and in case
> > of pre-etch older systems dont use https as today!
> > its the most common solution, easy, simple and withpout problem...
> >
> > and, about ejabberd case: many users asked to contribute with packages,
> > but well.. and in other words:
> > 2017-04-23 4:30 GMT-04:00 Philipp Huebner  > <mailto:debala...@debian.org>>:
> >
> > I must protest! Have you checked the facts lately?
> >
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ejabberd
> > <https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ejabberd>
> >
> > I have ported ejabberd 16.09 all the way back to Wheezy (via
> > backports-sloppy).
> >
> > so ok, lest see, its not in the main.. so most novice users not have
> > that and not know..
> >
> > well as suceded to me, i installed similar case bugreport from onther
> > (not from main).. due are not in main.. bugreport are broken due if u
> > install from backport deendences are not good property set:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859309#10
> > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859309#10>
> >
> > and its not the only case, there's many many...
> >
> >
> > If you are running a public server on a Debian release older than
> > Wheezy, that is a severe security problem to every participant on
> > the net and should be shut down immediately.
> > It's also totally your own fault then that you have only an ancient
> > ejabberd version available. You cannot expect a current release of
> > any software to be present in an obsolete Debian release.
> >
> > it's nonsense said the outdated software are bad
> >
> > bad its the non-patched software.. the poor tested software, so dont
> > said ilogic things...
> >
> > so today systemd have two problems, two open bugs in debian track (now
> > archived due no have solutions) such as example the killing process
> > problem, this problem raised once again was switched... but anyway,
> > debian swict event contrubute to the effors of the other proyects..
> > systemd was poor tested.. but most ditribution was swichted..
> >
> > please how we can trust in software with some "dirty" practices, like
> > merge udev to force usage of systemd? i remenber the problem.. but here
> > we are---
> >
> > Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
> > http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
> >
> > 2017-04-23 4:30 GMT-04:00 Philipp Huebner  > <mailto:debala...@debian.org>>:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 22.04.2017 um 16:35 schrieb PICCORO McKAY Lenz:
> > [...]
> >
> > debian have many out (very out) to date packages like ejabberd..
> > and u
> > tell me about "security" please! theres a issue related to slim,
> > due bad
> > integrtion with pam and systemd, see it
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > debian have many out (very out) to date packages like ejabberd..
> > and u
> > tell me about "security" please!
> >
> >
> >
> > I must protest! Have you checked the facts lately?
> >
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ejabberd
> > <https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ejabberd>
> >
> > I have ported ejabberd 16.09 all the way back to Wheezy (via
> > backports-sloppy).
> >
> > ejabberd 16.09 is the latest release 

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

2017-04-24 3:37 GMT-04:00 Michael . :

> For the life of me I do not understand why this is in the Debian Live
> mailing list but a couple of things need clarifying, well I think they do
> anyway.
>
> >>oh umm this are out of the main threat.. i want to use the
> archive.debian.net interface, that's all, i only have help from someone
> to restore, but i refuse that u said.. u are wrong, at the moment o wheeze,
> ejabbed was many years outdated!!!
>
> I think you need to understand Debian's policy of not upgrading versions
> within a release. If the package you are referring to was "many years
> outdated" when wheezy (as testing) entered freeze  it would never be
> upgraded to a newer release in the regular or security repositories. It
> could, however, be upgraded in the backport repositories which I believe is
> what  Philipp mentioned.
>
well as i said, wheeze does not fit or work in my older but working very
well hardware... and many of my many devices like zoran 36120 framegrabber
are not included in recent kernels


>
> Now that is out of the way I am still at a loss to work out why this is in
> the Debian live mailing list.
>

i asking for someone that can help to made and restore the site.. if u
cannot or not can or not want, so well, pass... and thanks any way...

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

oh umm this are out of the main threat.. i want to use the
archive.debian.net interface, that's all, i only have help from someone to
restore, but i refuse that u said.. u are wrong, at the moment o wheeze,
ejabbed was many years outdated!!!

so if the problemof the out service was the certificate, common, provide a
http nude way.. crackers, please, repositories are signed! and in case of
pre-etch older systems dont use https as today!
its the most common solution, easy, simple and withpout problem...

and, about ejabberd case: many users asked to contribute with packages, but
well.. and in other words:
2017-04-23 4:30 GMT-04:00 Philipp Huebner :

> I must protest! Have you checked the facts lately?
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ejabberd
>
> I have ported ejabberd 16.09 all the way back to Wheezy (via
> backports-sloppy).
>
so ok, lest see, its not in the main.. so most novice users not have that
and not know..

well as suceded to me, i installed similar case bugreport from onther (not
from main).. due are not in main.. bugreport are broken due if u install
from backport deendences are not good property set:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859309#10

and its not the only case, there's many many...

>
> If you are running a public server on a Debian release older than Wheezy,
> that is a severe security problem to every participant on the net and
> should be shut down immediately.
> It's also totally your own fault then that you have only an ancient
> ejabberd version available. You cannot expect a current release of any
> software to be present in an obsolete Debian release.
>
it's nonsense said the outdated software are bad

bad its the non-patched software.. the poor tested software, so dont said
ilogic things...

so today systemd have two problems, two open bugs in debian track (now
archived due no have solutions) such as example the killing process
problem, this problem raised once again was switched... but anyway, debian
swict event contrubute to the effors of the other proyects.. systemd was
poor tested.. but most ditribution was swichted..

please how we can trust in software with some "dirty" practices, like merge
udev to force usage of systemd? i remenber the problem.. but here we are---

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2017-04-23 4:30 GMT-04:00 Philipp Huebner :

> Hi
>
> Am 22.04.2017 um 16:35 schrieb PICCORO McKAY Lenz:
> [...]
>
>> debian have many out (very out) to date packages like ejabberd.. and u
>> tell me about "security" please! theres a issue related to slim, due bad
>> integrtion with pam and systemd, see it
>>
> [...]
>
>> debian have many out (very out) to date packages like ejabberd.. and u
>> tell me about "security" please!
>>
>
>
> I must protest! Have you checked the facts lately?
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ejabberd
>
> I have ported ejabberd 16.09 all the way back to Wheezy (via
> backports-sloppy).
>
> ejabberd 16.09 is the latest release before a series of major code
> refactorings introducing a ton of new bugs and regressions.
> It is still quite a recent release which can be configured to be 100%
> compliant with current XMPP compliance suites (XEP-0387).
>
> ejabberd 17.04 is already available in experimental and will be available
> for Jessie and Stretch once stretch-backports and jessie-backports-sloppy
> are open.
>
> If you are running a public server on a Debian release older than Wheezy,
> that is a severe security problem to every participant on the net and
> should be shut down immediately.
> It's also totally your own fault then that you have only an ancient
> ejabberd version available. You cannot expect a current release of any
> software to be present in an obsolete Debian release.
>
> Regards,
> --
>  .''`.   Philipp Huebner 
> : :'  :  pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A 5225  3DF9 E5CA 8C49 25E4 205F
> `. `'`
>   `-
>

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

2017-04-22 14:59 GMT-04:00 Narcis Garcia :

> Please calm down Piccoro.
>
i forgot that UPPERCASE means more noise. was not the intention.. was only
to mark important things.. but do you note the response in bugs 859308 and
859309 i noted some dias ago reportbug (made in pytnhon argg) crashed.. due
i installed the new version from backport.. so i couldn made reports ..
i'll try to report that and the reponse was very unconfortable : 859308
see it! https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859309#10


> I also hope that snapshot.debian.org works for many time for this same
> purpose, because some old machines can still be useful as they were
> useful several years ago. Now i586-based computers will be unsupported
> (it's ok) but I hope downloadable disks and repositories for versions
> that cover i586 remain functional for many years in the future.
>
hey i understand that as was with 16bits, will past with 32bits.. but this
time are different.. there's a long time way for 64bits yet! ;-) and google
now try to set faster that with chrome only for 64bits. jejeje now its
serious!


>
> The purpose of a computer is not always to launch latest Firefox or run
> a public web/mail server. A computer is often used for other old-fashion
> tasks not vulnerable to attacks.
> Not all people is "all day" thinking and working to defend themselves
> from other's attacks, and for some people in the real world has much
> more sense to reuse old hardware.
>
>

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

hi Andreas.. thanks for u'r work, i'll explain to u about my work.. related
to solve that preciselly:

2017-04-22 8:36 GMT-04:00 Andreas Heinlein :

debian have many out (very out) to date packages like ejabberd.. and u tell
me about "security" please! theres a issue related to slim, due bad
integrtion with pam and systemd, see it

>
> It is not the intent of Debian or the Open Source community to make you
> buy new hardware, nobody would benefit from that. Blame the vendor of your
> hardware for not supporting its devices instead. I know that an archive of
> old releases may still be sometimes useful. I once
>
the vendor its not related here.. due the hardware are working prefectly
i noted some dias ago reportbug (made in pytnhon argg) crashed.. due i
installed the new version from backport.. so i couldn made reports .. i'll
try to report that and the reponse was very unconfortable : 859308 see
it! https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859309#10

my sistem after install sllim (very bad integrate to systemd changes) got
broken due was unnable to connect to internet..  so i report using a
cybercafe.. but the response was very very unconfortable..
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859309#10 so please
people who can i report bug if the bug report was broken, and then
networkmananger was broken due bad integration of slim package? please, ...


please remember that it is most likely not Debian's fault that your device
> is no longer supported, so please calm down a bit. Also remember that any
> active system needs maintenance and
>
i try to do manteniance as its possible for a portio to those people that
not have money, not have hardware and not have resourde to follow
capitalims or resources to buy a new fashion hardware, and mostly when
their current hardware are working prefectly and better than others...

seem many of debian does not understand that world its more bigger rather
their little opensource debian systemd only hole.. its very frustrating try
to help and every door are constant closing...

please try to understand that some only try to use their hardware that are
present.. not buy newer when their present are currently working..

of course i understand that every must evolute.. but too muct evolution
only have one end: extintion.. including the hole space will be a freeze
dark with oscure matter...  so in those cases its better going very very
slow... and it hardware and softwaer still can be used why envolute?
so then if not broken, not update it!



> support. Even if your system works for you, there are millions of old and
> outdated systems out there which are being used as bots for attacking other
> people. Taking care of security is a form of social responsibility, IMHO.
>

in this behaviour, i try to help many people,..  that's why i very use the
debian archive front page search to my novice aprendice and then once that
learn the next way its the apt-cache way




> had to "revive" and old machine which was left running for 7 (!) years
> completely unmaintained. It had an old Adabas database on it which would
> only run with libc5, and in order to get the data exported I had to install
> some tools into that system. I was lucky that an archive with old software
> existed at that time.
>
> But, and that is the important point, please also remember that most work
> in the Open Source world is done in free time and free of charge. As
> already said, someone needs to maintain such an archive, and if there is
> noone then there is no archive. No reason to blame someone either.
>

since sarge, the most interesting people in contribute to debian proyect..
later then goes away from... so maybe its a debian out of the way
principies today?

debian have many out (very out) to date packages like ejabberd.. and u tell
me about "security" please!

in my free time, i'll try to colaborate to help up to date those packages..
but the process to become are very painfully for beginners and also mostly
for those that not have time to so many rules... starting by mentor
removals of work after only some days...


>
> bye,
> Andreas
>
>
>

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

2017-04-22 0:38 GMT-04:00 Paul Wise :

> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:02 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
>
> work on it. It is only for obsolete insecure Debian releases, we
>
the currrent debian "secure" "fashion" "modern" debian release DOES NOT FIT
AND WORK ON MY MACHINE AND MANY MORE due does not have support for frame
grabber capture devices REMOVED IN KERNEL 2.6.18


> strongly recommend you upgrade to a supported release and use
>
UPGRADE i'm tyred to hear about that .. and when people upgrade many thing
"does not supported" but the hardware ARE GOOD AND WORKING WITH OLD RELEASE!

how stupid are feeling my people when grab a version and some note said
"the devices X will not be supported due are older"...



> packages.debian.org instead. squeeze and lenny should *definitely* not
> be used any longer. What is blocking your upgrade to
> wheezy/jessie/stretch?
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>
>

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

the http://snapshot.debian.org/ its the great tool and resource for
retrieve the specific package.. and study cases ONCE a specific
objetive are found... my novice aprendices get into it after some web
serach into the debian archive web search interface..

al already knows that with apt-cache and apt-file i can made it, but i
try to able to made friendly the system before introducing in a more
complex and advanced world of debian..

in archive.debian.net the old web package search tool was available
and its a good starter point for search into older packages specialy
for squeeze and lenny distributions widelly used here for most
hardware (with our own patcheds backported from debian stable and lts)

2017-04-21 12:02 GMT-04:00, Andrey Rahmatullin :
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:54:08AM -0400, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
>> yeah, that's why i asked! obviusly i asked due if some one are working
>> on sometihing..
> Is http://snapshot.debian.org/ not enough for your tasks?
>
> --
> WBR, wRAR
>


-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

yeah, that's why i asked! obviusly i asked due if some one are working
on sometihing..

2017-04-21 11:20 GMT-04:00, Mattia Rizzolo :
> have you also read that page?..
>
> more info: the person who was nominally maintaining it was not maintaining
> it, as he let the SSL certificate expire, and so DSA took repointed the DNS
> to an error page.
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:04 PM PICCORO McKAY Lenz 
> wrote:
>
>> some one noted or using any time the https://archive.debian.net/
>> service..
>>
>> was usefully for packagin notes and test over other versions..
>> archived of course.. was usefully for my lives due most old hardware
>> like framegrabber capture devices does not have support today in
>> current klernels...
>>
>> today this service are changed and now only put a static page in
>> frontend.. anybocy knows about related?
>>
>> --
>> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
>> http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>


-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

some one noted or using any time the https://archive.debian.net/ service..

was usefully for packagin notes and test over other versions..
archived of course.. was usefully for my lives due most old hardware
like framegrabber capture devices does not have support today in
current klernels...

today this service are changed and now only put a static page in
frontend.. anybocy knows about related?

-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

i dont understand why the other package depends on that? of course, if more
a more moco-soft related will be packaged, this package good to be includen
in distribution,

its a common case in all mocosoft related... the main target its to use
more and more their "standars", i really hate all mocosoft related

so i think its better a static build inside all the code of the packages,
due its more faster and prevents a propaganda of mocosoft..

this "library" does not provide real funtionallity, its only to code "as
moscosoft like"

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2017-04-03 20:22 GMT-04:00 Mattia Rizzolo :

> Control: owner -1 !
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 01:07:18AM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "microsoft-gsl"
>
> Hi!
>
> >  Package name: microsoft-gsl
>
> As others said already, 'microsoft' in the package name is a sad
> situation.  Personally, is just a can of worms I do not want to open for
> so little, so please rename it to something else (I like 'ms-gsl').
>
> >  Version : 0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1
>
> I recommend using 0 instead of 0.1 as base version.
>
> >   dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/microsoft-
> gsl/microsoft-gsl_0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1.dsc
>
> As I said privately, I'd enjoy having a git repository for this :)
> Here I feel you could enjoy even more baing the repo out of upstream
> git (see an example in the dehydrated package); or you can see my
> pencil2d package for an example of a thing building tarball out of
> upstream git, ready to be committed; as you prefer.
>
> * test building, I noticed it didn't take advantage of my quad-core
>   system; why didn't you use compat level 10?
> * please send that UnitTest.patch upstream; that's clearly one of those
>   cases their stupid system with a case-insensitive file system tricked
>   them…
> * that empty directory tests/unittest-cpp, why didn't you remove it?
>
> --
> regards,
> Mattia Rizzolo
>
> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
> more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
> Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
> Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
>

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

due copyrights, and trademarks, its better do not use the "micosoft"
keyword.. the package can be name ms-gsl and produce libmsgsl-dev

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2017-03-31 18:07 GMT-04:00 Коля Гурьев :

> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "microsoft-gsl"
>
>  Package name: microsoft-gsl
>  Version : 0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1
>  URL : https://github.com/Microsoft/GSL
>  License : MIT (Expat)
>  Section : libdevel
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
>   libmicrosoft-gsl-dev - Microsoft Guidelines Support Library
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/microsoft-gsl
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
>   dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/microsoft-gsl/
> microsoft-gsl_0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1.dsc
>
> More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com

Bug#859235: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.27-1 -- official telegram messaging application

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

the package must contains all the b-d .. so u must complete that for a
right RFS..

well what a crap, depends on mocosoft fots but its better than nothing..
whatsupp does no provide linux desktop clients... neither source code..

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2017-03-31 17:29 GMT-04:00 Коля Гурьев :

> Oh sorry, I forgot to say that for build this package you have to install
> libmicrosoft-gsl-dev [1]. This is build dependency.
>
> [1]: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/microsoft-gsl/
> microsoft-gsl_0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1.dsc
>
>

Bug#826266: RFS: dvtm/0.15-1~bpo8+1 ITP

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

the problem its that seems here are two situations:

1) mentors removes the packages too soon or policies are ilogic!
2) seems uploaded to ftp package polls but not found? sponsored !?

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2016-06-03 15:03 GMT-04:00 Gianfranco Costamagna <
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it>:

> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
> >
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dvtm/dvtm_0.15-1~bpo8+1.dsc
>
>
>
> 404
>
> G.
>
>

Bug#820644: RFS: libretro-snes9x [ITP]

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

2016-06-13 21:37 GMT-04:00 Sérgio Benjamim :

> Hey,
> This libretro package needs a frontend to work, like RetroArch, Phoenix
> [1], Gnome Games [2] or ZMZ [3].
> I think "Provides: snes9x" is not the case, with snes9x or snes9x-gtk the
> user expects a standalone program.
>
that libretro core of snes9x does not provide snes9x due are not functional
without a fronend as retroarch!

please upload this package ! too many time!

Bug#828024: RFS: libretro-beetle-wswan [ITP]

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

this package are market as done! but the package are still not in debian
package !

removed yet from mentors but i cannot retrieve from sid! the dsc file are
not found!

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2016-06-23 20:39 GMT-04:00 Sérgio Benjamim :

> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hey dear mentors!
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "libretro-beetle-wswan"
>
> This is the libretro port of Beetle/Mednafen WSWAN module, a
> WonderSwan emulator.
>
> It's a fork of Mednafen to fit better with the libretro API, so it's
> not possible to use the same source code of Mednafen package.
>
>
> * Package name : libretro-beetle-wswan
>   Version  : 0.9.35.1+git20160623
>
>   Upstream Author  : Ryphecha / The RetroArch Team (beetle fork)
>
> * URL  : https://github.com/libretro/beetle-wswan-libretro
> * License  : GPL-2+
>   Programming Lang : C/C++
>   Description  : port of Beetle/Mednafen WSWAN to libretro API
>
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> libretro-beetle-wswan - Libretro wrapper for the Beetle WSWAN core
>
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libretro-beetle-wswan
>
>
> More information about RetroArch and the libretro API can be obtained from
> http://www.libretro.com/index.php/api/
>
> --
> sergio-br2
>
>

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

2016-04-12 6:44 GMT-04:30 Gianfranco Costamagna :
> sdl looks like an embedded library to me
> also tremor
the codes inside the libretro are modified to fith with libretro cores
needs i think!

most of siources are like, example mednafen modules are split and then
reimplemented separatelly, that includes build-in tremor and midmok of
mednafen

> or dates are wrong
> ./core/tremor/block.c: * THE OggVorbis 'TREMOR' SOURCE CODE IS (C) COPYRIGHT 
> 1994-2002*
> ./core/tremor/block.h: * THE OggVorbis 'TREMOR' SOURCE CODE IS (C) COPYRIGHT 
> 1994-2008*
that its one reason of why dates are wrong

of course i suggested to made this kind of changes in a secoind fase,
like does with mednafen debian package, that includes many non-system
code like tremor and others

if this are the case most of the software could be packaged in debian

mentors delete all the work after 2 month when people are full of work!

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

That its a problem for people that are doing a hard work:
>> mentors packages that has a related ITP must be mantain event erased
>> in the time!
> Tell that to the debian devs who made the mentors website, I don't know why
> the website deletes your package after 2 months.

and that its a true:
> If you have only the package there, you lost all the work you had
> packaging...

i propose to mantian packages that have a ITP or RFP already related!

packages that not have an ITP or RTP or bug related can be deleted
after 2 months

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

well, my purpose its made a hack, regarding in the unclear issue, lets see:

mame now its gpl...
genesisplus its mame license
then all its gpl?

jejeje
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com


2016-04-06 22:24 GMT-04:30 Sérgio Benjamim :
> Yeah, right, it may confuse people. I changed that in Copyright. Take a look
> again.
>
>
> cheers,
> sergio-br2
>
>
>
> On 06/04/2016 11:36, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
>>
>> 2016-04-06 9:37 GMT-04:30 Sergio benjamim Rocha filho
>> :
>>>
>>> MAME changed its license, but Genesis Plus GX uses the old one.
>>> Also, it's based on some portions of old mame code:
>>> https://github.com/ekeeke/Genesis-Plus-GX/blob/master/LICENSE.txt#L7
>>
>> i already know, ok i not explain too much, but ...
>>
>> i suggested to better put licence as only non-commercial due makes
>> more confused if put "mame" as licensed due now are gpl
>
>

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

hi again, i forget to say:

only the name and trademark are copyright, the code portion are pgl by nicola

http://mamedev.org/?p=422 las line said that only the name are
trademark, if u revised the code seems some portions of the emulator
are changed to a more flexible, so this package must be revised
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com


2016-04-06 10:06 GMT-04:30 PICCORO McKAY Lenz :
> 2016-04-06 9:37 GMT-04:30 Sergio benjamim Rocha filho 
> :
>> MAME changed its license, but Genesis Plus GX uses the old one.
>>Also, it's based on some portions of old mame code:
>> https://github.com/ekeeke/Genesis-Plus-GX/blob/master/LICENSE.txt#L7
>
> i already know, ok i not explain too much, but ...
>
> i suggested to better put licence as only non-commercial due makes
> more confused if put "mame" as licensed due now are gpl

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

2016-04-06 9:37 GMT-04:30 Sergio benjamim Rocha filho :
> MAME changed its license, but Genesis Plus GX uses the old one.
>Also, it's based on some portions of old mame code:
> https://github.com/ekeeke/Genesis-Plus-GX/blob/master/LICENSE.txt#L7

i already know, ok i not explain too much, but ...

i suggested to better put licence as only non-commercial due makes
more confused if put "mame" as licensed due now are gpl

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

The mame license its now commercial compatible and GPL compatible

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2016-04-05 22:27 GMT-04:30 Sérgio Benjamim :

> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hey dear mentors!
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "libretro-genesisplusgx"
>
> Genesis Plus GX is a Sega 8/16-bit emulator focused on accuracy
> and portability.
>
> The source code, originally based on Genesis Plus 1.3 by Charles MacDonald,
> has been heavily modified & enhanced, with respect to initial goals
> and design, in order to improve the accuracy of emulation, implementing
> new features and adding support for extra peripherals,cartridge & systems
> hardware.
>
> The result is that Genesis Plus GX is now more a continuation of the
> original project than a simple port, providing very accurate emulation
> and 100% compatibility with Genesis / Mega Drive, Sega/Mega CD,
> Master System, Game Gear & SG-1000 released software (including all
> unlicensed or pirate known dumps), also emulating backwards compatibility
> modes when available.
>
>
> * Package name : libretro-genesisplusgx
>   Version  : 1.7.4+git20160330
>
>   Upstream Author  : Charles MacDonald / Eke-Eke 
>
> * URL  : https://github.com/ekeeke/Genesis-Plus-GX
> * License  : non-commercial/MAME
>   Programming Lang : C
>   Description  : Genesis/Mega Drive, Sega/Mega CD, Master System, Game
> Gear and SG-1000 emulator
>
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> libretro-genesisplusgx - Libretro wrapper for Genesis Plus GX
>
>
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/genesisplusgx
>
>
> More information about RetroArch and the libretro API can be obtained from
> http://www.libretro.com/index.php/api/
>
> --
> Sérgio Benjamim
>
>

Re: Subject: RFS: adminer/4.2.1-1

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

I have some notes on that packaging:

1) only configures apache2, lighttpd and nginx are not automatic configured
2) recommends are also depends (php-psql or php-sqlite)
3) adminer does not handled any documentatin around debian specified
installation
4) install a lot of plugins but does not provide any hint about these
inclusion!

apache2 tody are the most used only in enterprices but at home users does
not have enought resources for that software now.. me not! i'm a lighty
user!



Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2015-04-20 6:51 GMT-04:30 Medhamsh V :

> Dear mentors,
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
>  Severity: normal
>
>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "adminer"
>
>  * Package name: adminer
>Version : 4.2.1-1
>Upstream Author : Jakub Vrana
>  * URL : http://adminer.org
>  * License : Apache 2.0
>Section : web
>
>   It builds those binary packages:
>
> adminer- Web-based database administration tool
>
>   To access further information about this package, please visit the 
> following URL:
>
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/adminer
>
>
>   Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/adminer/adminer_4.2.1-1.dsc
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Medhamsh,
>
> GPG Finger Print: BD16 E32E CA4D 83A3 1270  725D D766 7997 0ABC 20E9
> http://pascal.iiit.ac.in/~medhamsh/medhamsh.gpg
>

Re: mentors.d.n upload issues

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,196 DEBUG [debexpo.importer.26427] Determining

> user from 'Changed-By:' field: William Blough 
> 2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,196 DEBUG [debexpo.importer.26427]
> Changed-By's email address is: de...@blough.us
> 2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,380 ERROR [debexpo.importer.26427] Rejected:
> Your upload does not contain a valid signature. Output was:
>
> gpg: Signature made Di 16 Jul 2013 02:04:25 UTC using RSA key ID 566D2F19
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
> i have the same problem when i upload a sources.. so then what i suppost
to do?

Re: Why is it so hard to get sponsors.....?

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Charles Plessy  wrote:
>
> Hi Lenz,

Cheers
>
>
> with time, DDs tend to meet loved ones,
i have too, also I have a couple, just one, not several, and I am
responsible .. a'n my loves use in mayority linux, not window-like
over linux
>
> make children, be promoted at work,
i have family too, and also time ot made Venenux.net, and promote it
at my work, event if MS dinamycs will imposse in
>
> have new passions, develop new talents not related to software, take care of
> their old relatives, etc.
i'm not developer, i'm electricist, and also like take care of gamming
>
>
> If you have time to dedicate to packaging, please step up and help the teams
> you mentionned.
when users send some "trivial" help. packages said that are nor
relevant.. many times.. as examples, currenlty razorqt package status
are under heavywieit lisence issues event tecnically funtionality
>  What DDs who become short in time make sure in these teams, is
> that the infrastructure and learning curves are as easy as possible for
> newcomers, in order to to help others to contribute where they can not do
> themselves anymore.
Long ago, when debian pass from "sarge" to "etch" there was a major
man-power drain, also a etch-lenny hole in package releases, in my
case, it was very frustrating for maintenance staff had to know a lot
of things that had nothing to do with electronics or games, when
wanted to help with these types of packages, well, today we have
"mentors" but getting sponsors is equally frustrating
>
> Have a nice week-end,
>
> --
> Charles Plessy
sorry but all of u said i do also, but not use as excuse for that
problem! get sponsors for critical problems in some cases are very
frustrating.. specially in the ejabberd package that have a terrible
error in http send forms.. i made some suggestios and nothing...


-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qglochekone.blogspot.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALci+FT1h_BjZt2YXT=MhMz3E_mRoR6K4iFUOAD=pjesuge...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Why is it so hard to get sponsors.....?

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

in recent years the debian packagers have focused on licensing, setting
aside as much therefore important that the package works ..

I've noticed that some reports have response as "is not critical, is still
working," or else "not reproducible", or better "u can made a patch u can
made a fix u ca... u can.. u do that" co DD/DM has no time!! NO TIME!??

one can see that many DD have no experience in the software packages nature
in charge .. l this is main reason why the quality / performance of debian
packages has fallen, and because these characters to nosaber that I should
do such software are not interested in doing sponsoring

the mayor injury are in electronic/science and gamming part

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Andreas Tille  wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> thanks for your great analysis.  I might like to stress explicitly one
> item (even if I totally agree with all others in general)
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:37:10PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Specialization:
> >
> > Debian contributors generally work on stuff they use or are otherwise
> > are interested in. This can limit the scope of software that gets
> > sponsored. With well-functioning teams, it can also mean that software
> > for a specific area is well covered with sponsorship, debian-med is a
> > good example. Unfortunately can mean
>
> [Your paragraph is ending a bit unexpected - perhaps you forget to type
>  something]
>
> As one of the active sponsors in Debian Med I would really like to
> stress this.  I'm also trying to hint people about other teams they
> could possibly approach because I have the feeling that the sponsorship
> in *any* *working* team works quite good.  There are teams formed around
> technical issues like languages (pkg-perl, python modules etc.) and
> there are teams targeting at end users that try to create an outright
> system for a specific target user group.  The technical term in Debian
> is "Debian Pure Blends" in short "Blends".  You can find a list of those
> Blends here:
>
>http://blends.alioth.debian.org/
>
> Please note that not all Blends work equally well and some of these are
> dead / dying - but perhaps you might dive into this field and help
> vitalising this team.  In any case if you have a package that to some
> extend fits into the scope of the Blends teams (or the technical teams
> I mentioned above) you should definitely contact their mailing list in
> addition to Debian mentors.
>
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130228085523.gb9...@an3as.eu
>
>


-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qglochekone.blogspot.com

Re: RFS: simpleburn/1.6.5-1 [ITP]

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

important fo users respect to the application:

package depends are wrong, depends on bash, also on recent libcdio from wheeze..

there's nonsense in a light application to use too hoigh depends for
too little apps, in this case users should go letar o soon to more
heavy apps..
i wish to use simple burn with libcdio from lenny (0.78) or squeeze
almost (0.81) event the lasted wheeze (0.83)

--
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qglochekone.blogspot.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/calci+frvyaymfembp9ucvtraokoodbmnffdk4o5oux5wvah...@mail.gmail.com

problem shlib error 9 output status error 2 : need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

i have compiled and debianised razorqt from git and now have this problem:

dpkg-shlibdeps: fallo: Cannot continue due to the error above.
Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have
any shlibs or symbols file.
To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
dh_shlibdeps: dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/razorqt-panel.substvars
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/bin/razor-panel
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libshowdesktop.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libsensors.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libpanelvolume.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libmount.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libmainmenu.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libtray.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libnetworkmonitor.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libpanelworldclock.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libscreensaver.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libpanelsysstat.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libpanelkbindicator.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libcolorpicker.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libcpuload.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libquicklaunch.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libdesktopswitch.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libclock.so
debian/razorqt-panel/usr/lib/razor-panel/libtaskbar.so returned exit code 2
make: *** [binary] Error 9
dpkg-buildpackage: fallo: debian/rules binary devolvió un estado de salida
de error 2

first time hat i have this king of problem.. ny have something similar?

this means that i must setupt that shlibs search for systat plugin libs
inside instalation directory of debinised package?

-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qglochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

HELL YEAH!

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Ma Xiaojun  wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:51 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz
>  wrote:
> > Ping! please!
>
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/rar
>



-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qglochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

Ping! please!

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:27 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz
wrote:

> Ping?
>
> ( i also need this package he he)
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Ma Xiaojun  wrote:
> > Ping again since 9 days passed.
> > Expected at least a "pong".
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> > Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/CAGVx7UXv2BRuO+fcszQ=cjk6kasv0b_d7az5ashcsccwlvc...@mail.gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
> http://qglochekone.blogspot.com
>



-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qglochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

Ping?

( i also need this package he he)

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Ma Xiaojun  wrote:
> Ping again since 9 days passed.
> Expected at least a "pong".
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 
> http://lists.debian.org/CAGVx7UXv2BRuO+fcszQ=cjk6kasv0b_d7az5ashcsccwlvc...@mail.gmail.com
>



-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qglochekone.blogspot.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALci+FRrZGP=0zo4m18degnsjudxbwd7p9178vhmq16cx6f...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#683840: RFS: razorqt/0.4.1-1~exp1 [ITP]

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

please see my control file in
https://github.com/mckaygerhard/razor-qt/blob/master/distr/deb/debian/control
 first
Manuel

in lasted commit
https://github.com/mckaygerhard/razor-qt/commit/c5985e8967a2ee6b13f91d4c506b9078a2787e62
i
commented all changes about name packages follow debian policy please read
it carefully

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <
manuel.montez...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Bart,
>
> 2012/8/4 Bart Martens :
> > Hi Manuel,
> >
> > The package name is "razor-qt" on the ITP and "razorqt" on the RFS and at
> > mentors.  Why the difference ?
>
> Initially I was using "razor-qt", then tried to follow upstream's
> recent names in Ubuntu's PPA:
>
> https://launchpad.net/~razor-qt/+archive/ppa/
>
> I don't know why they decided to change, though.
>
> There are some advantages in not having the dash and those making
> "razorqt" a "unit", for example, that it doesn't look like "Qt's
> interface for package Razor", or that it helps to shorten package
> names in general (eg razorqt-policykit-agent instead of
> razor-qt-policykit-agent).
>
> But in short, there's no strong reason.
>
>
> Cheers.
> --
> Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo 
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/CAPQ4b8k91sT+jWTDpBB=60omdhc+wuftnyu_1twnewoq5o+...@mail.gmail.com
>
>


-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qglochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Minutes from "Getting your packages into Debian"

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

this stupid DM process only make debian packagin more slower to evolution,
i have a problem uploading a debian mentors sig file and nobody respond and
solves my problem

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:22 AM, David Bremner  wrote:

>
> Hi all;
>
> Here are the minutes from the (apparently) annual "mentors-bof", thanks
> to Didier Raboud for taking them. It turned into a bit more of a
> tutorial session than last year, which I don't think is necessarily a
> bad thing. I also attach the LaTeX source for the slides; a pdf is
> available (somewhere) on penta.debconf.org.
>
> ===
>
> QUOTE: Bremner: Gobby is not emacs, it's so sad.
>
> Some statistics:
>
> * 18790 packages are in Sid, amongst which 3036 are non-NMU sponsored
>  packages. If you use Debian, you are probably needing one of those;
>  you probably rely on any of them.  946 active DDs, 178 DMs, 906
>  sponsored people.
>
> OPINION: Bremner: There's a high barrier to be able to upload packages
> without a key in the /magic keyring/.
>
> OPINION: Bremner: Know packaging, love packaging, do packaging. This
> amount of work is the tiny part of getting packages sponsored.
>
> Bremner: sponsoring as a source for new contributors, not only about new
> packages; most of actual DDs have come to Debian trough getting packages
> sponsored, this shouldn't be underestimated as a source of future DDs.
>
> Bremner: There are DDs that sponsor, others that don't, various reasons
> undermine this.
>
> == The big picture ==
>
> There is sort-of a "command-line" shock: debian-mentors{.*} is not
> anywhere close to Launchpad™.
>
> The Mighty Steps to Getting My Package Uploaded:
>
> * Prepare (Close your browser, open a terminal, Gh !? )
> * ITP (for new packages, reportbug wnpp)
> * go package (get help from #debian-mentors, feedback on your
>ITP[probably not positive].
> * upload (well, sort-of) to mentors.debian.net : Upload, QA
> check, …
> * File a "Request For Sponsoring" (RFS) against
> sponsorship-requests. \o/ BTS fun
> * Wait, Revise, Wait, Revise, More Wait. This time the feedback is
> most probably positive.
> * Your Package Gets Uploaded™ (or not…)
>
> == "What packages belong in Debian ?" ==
>
> It recently came as a surprise to some that "someone wants a new package
> to Debian but it might very well be that `Debian doesn't want it`…"
>
> ITP serves three roles:
> * Sanity check incoming packages
> * First contact of new contributions with the Debian community
> * Mutex to avoid multiple people working on the same
>   thing. (less important in sponsoring context)
>
> The perception of ITP depends on the side: the filer says "here's the
> work I did, I propose it to Debian", while "debian-devel" (if that
> exists) understands it as "here's a new package `Debian` will have to
> maintain.
>
> Closing RFS's is another (fairly rarely used) feedback mechanism: make
> sure feedback is given out soon enough.
>
> == Tracking sponsorship requests in the BTS ==
>
> After this experiment started, there has been been a lot more noise on
> the mailing list, but is planned to be improved.
>
> * 28 RC bugs fixed, 172 updates, 69? new packages; quite a successful
>   experiment.
>
> == Discussion ==
>
> Q: Bottleneck in those steps ^ ? A: Not enough sponsors.
>
> I: Teams are not an administrative barrier, they are probably a resource.
>
> Q: Maybe we are not communicating / enforcing the needed commitment for
> new packages: in fact, the lifetime of a package is in measured in
> multiple years (unstable->testing->stable->security-> …).
>
> I: Removal of packages doesn't only carry a /technical/ cost, it does
> carry a human cost too (users, …).
>
> Q: Do the packages need to be in english? A: Not necessarily, but
> description and copyright probably need both for sponsors and
> FTP-Masters team.
>
>


-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qglochekone.blogspot.com

Re: unable to upload packages dsc files.. URGENCY

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

>
>
>
> Wait half an hour and retry: works.
>
umm i try this.. and nothinh,.. but i'll try this again with my key
uploaded in a public server .. maybe replication its slowly


> Conclusion (in my case): it can take some time before
> a freshly uploaded key is taken into account.
>
my ley are into account since past week!!!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:57 AM, bilibop project wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:42:12 -0430
> > i try to upload my dsc packages and sources but i get key singin errors,
> i generated the 4096 key and put in debian mentors profile.. but when i
> upload this happened:
> >
> > GnuPG signature check failed on XX.changes
> > gpg: Signature made Fri May 18 23:24:18 2012 UTC using DSA key ID YYY
> > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> > (Exit status 2)
> > /X.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature!
> > Removing /.changes, but keeping its associated files
> for now.
> >
> >
> > i generated a 4096 key and export a public key, upload to debian mentors
> profile and what should do  extra? Using SH256 etc etc and whateve.. etc
> >
> >
> > i put a public key en some server but removed and put again and nothing!
>
> I had had the same problem last week:
> I generated a new 4096R key and export a public key,
> upload to debian mentors profile. When running
>
> dput mentors blah_X.Y.Z.changes
>
> I had the same message:
>
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
> Wait half an hour and retry: works.
> Conclusion (in my case): it can take some time before
> a freshly uploaded key is taken into account.
>
> Cheers,
> quidame
>



-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
Cofundador de Venenux;  debian based multimedia alike free only zealots
users (oh well, i try but..too many free guidelines buahhh)
http://shutendouji.net
creador de massenkoh linux; debian enhanchements for better up to date
support on stable brand, including non-free soft.

Re: unable to upload packages dsc files.. URGENCY

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

sorry.. i dont see the header..

i'm using the same key..

i have loade in mentors a  id Current GPG key: 4096R/251CEB87
RSA of 4096 bits, ID 251CEB87, created at 2012-05-31

in my machine:
gpg --list-keys

pub   4096R/251CEB87 2012-05-31
uid  PICCORO Lenz McKAY (venenux & debian packagin) <
mckaygerh...@gmail.com>
sub   4096R/69F38016 2012-05-31

in my signed dsc file example :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
etc etc etc..


-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
Cofundador de Venenux;  debian based multimedia alike free only zealots
users (oh well, i try but..too many free guidelines buahhh)
http://shutendouji.net
creador de massenkoh linux; debian enhanchements for better up to date
support on stable brand, including non-free soft.

unable to upload packages dsc files.. URGENCY

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

i try to upload my dsc packages and sources but i get key singin errors, i
generated the 4096 key and put in debian mentors profile.. but when i
upload this happened:

GnuPG signature check failed on XX.changes
gpg: Signature made Fri May 18 23:24:18 2012 UTC using DSA key ID YYY
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
(Exit status 2)
/X.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature!
Removing /.changes, but keeping its associated files
for now.

i generated a 4096 key and export a public key, upload to debian mentors
profile and what should do  extra? Using SH256 etc etc and whateve.. etc

i put a public key en some server but removed and put again and nothing!

-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
Cofundador de Venenux;  debian based multimedia alike free only zealots
users (oh well, i try but..too many free guidelines buahhh)
http://shutendouji.net
creador de massenkoh linux; debian enhanchements for better up to date
support on stable brand, including non-free soft.