RFS: sshm
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sshm". * Package name: sshm Version : 0.2-4 Upstream Author : Patrick Matthaei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/sshm/ and http://www.linux-dev.org/ * License : GPL Section : admin It builds these binary packages: sshm - A little commandline tool to manage your ssh servers The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sshm - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sshm/sshm_0.2-4.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Patrick Matthäi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: sshm
Hello again and thanks for your useful tips. I hope it's now all better, I tried to fix all your tips. > * please add a manpage for sshm. > > if you fix above things, i'll check again. > But I will include a manpage for the next release, I hope this will be ok. Regards, Patrick Matthäi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: sshm
Daniel Baumann schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
I hope it's now all better, I tried to fix all your tips.
there are a few things left:
* if the package was not previously available in a repository where
users could have installed it, we normally upload the first package
with revision -1. you have revision -5. if your package wasn't
widespread before, please move it to -1.
* Depends: should have a ${misc:Depends}
* with useless stuff in rules, i also ment this one here:
#docbook-to-man debian/sshm.sgml > sshm.1
* you removed dh_installchangelogs completely, instead of just
removing its parameter. this has the effect
that debian/changelog is not copied to
/usr/share/$package/changelog.Debian. you need to readd it.
* you removed dh_installdocs, instead of just removing its
helper file (debian/docs). this has the effect that
debian/copyright is not copied to /usr/share/$package/copyright.
you need to readd it.
make always sure, you run lintian on the package to check for errors.
if you fix above things, i'll sponsor the package.
But I will include a manpage for the next release, I hope this will be ok.
that's ok, yes.
Thanks for all your good tips! I'm sorry, this is my first package :)
I fixed it and uploaded it again to mentors as 0.2-1.
Regard, Patrick Matthäi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: sshm
Daniel Baumann schrieb: Patrick Matthäi wrote: Thanks for all your good tips! I'm sorry, this is my first package :) welcome :) I fixed it and uploaded it again to mentors as 0.2-1. good, uploaded. if you need/want further sponsoring, contact me off-list: http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/sponsoring.html#contact Thank you Daniel! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: tork
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tork". * Package name: tork Version : 0.20-1 Upstream Author : Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://tork.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : kde It builds these binary packages: libtorksocks - an anonymity manager for KDE (library files) tork - an anonymity manager for KDE tork-data - an anonymity manager for KDE (data files) The upload would fix these bugs: 444329 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tork - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tork/tork_0.20-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Patrick Matthäi If this is an update to a package that is already in Debian: From: Patrick Matthäi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: tork (updated package) Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.20-1 of my package "tork". It builds these binary packages: libtorksocks - an anonymity manager for KDE (library files) tork - an anonymity manager for KDE tork-data - an anonymity manager for KDE (data files) The upload would fix these bugs: 444329 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tork - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tork/tork_0.20-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Additional informations: These packages still have lintian warnings. I fixed much more with my included patchset. I contacted the upstream autor, he will include my patchset to the next release and hopefull he will patch the other existing errors, like the missing SONAME support or the wrong paths of the three little helper programs for tork, which are currently located in usr/bin. He should move them to /usr/lib/tork - so they don't need a manpage. Kind regards Patrick Matthäi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: tork
Patrick Matthäi schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tork". * Package name: tork Version : 0.20-1 Upstream Author : Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://tork.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : kde It builds these binary packages: libtorksocks - an anonymity manager for KDE (library files) tork - an anonymity manager for KDE tork-data - an anonymity manager for KDE (data files) The upload would fix these bugs: 444329 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tork - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tork/tork_0.20-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Patrick Matthäi If this is an update to a package that is already in Debian: From: Patrick Matthäi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: tork (updated package) Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.20-1 of my package "tork". It builds these binary packages: libtorksocks - an anonymity manager for KDE (library files) tork - an anonymity manager for KDE tork-data - an anonymity manager for KDE (data files) The upload would fix these bugs: 444329 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tork - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tork/tork_0.20-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Additional informations: These packages still have lintian warnings. I fixed much more with my included patchset. I contacted the upstream autor, he will include my patchset to the next release and hopefull he will patch the other existing errors, like the missing SONAME support or the wrong paths of the three little helper programs for tork, which are currently located in usr/bin. He should move them to /usr/lib/tork - so they don't need a manpage. Kind regards Patrick Matthäi I added "privoxy" to the depends of tork, I will update the package on mentors, if anyone is interested in sponsoring this package :) Regards, Patrick Matthäi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passing variables to a Makefile
Charles Plessy schrieb: Dear mentors, in a package I prepare, there is the following line in a source/Makefile: CPPFLAGS=-O3 -funroll-loops -march=i686 -mfpmath=sse -msse -mmmx This is obviously not convenient for building on many platforms, so I decided to override it with the following command in debian/rules: CPPFLAGS='$(CFLAGS)' $(MAKE) --environment-overrides --directory=source However, I am quite unexperienced with makefiles, and my gut feeling tells me that I may be doing something wrong... Can somebody tell me ? ( Just in case one wants to see more context, I have uploaded the package on mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dialign-t/dialign-t_0.2.2-1.dsc It is work in progress unsuitable for anyghing else! ) Have a nice day, Hi Charles, better use a patch system like dpatch for it. Don't modify the source, write a patch for it! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Orphaned clanlib package
Hello Maintainers,
I'm searching for a new maintainer for the orphaned package clanlib.
Here are some informations about the package:
WNPP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=414533
p.d.o: http://packages.debian.org/clanlib
PTS: http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clanlib.html
Upstream Version: 0.8
Maintainer Version: 0.6.5-1-4
I need this package maintained and in version 0.8, because I want to
maintain trophy and on the other hand, it's for some other applications
outdated, too.
I think I haven't got enough experience yet to maintain such a library
package, maybe later, but not at the moment.
So hopefully someone will adopt it. :)
Regards,
Patrick Matthäi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Orphaned clanlib package
Stefan Potyra schrieb: Hi, Am Samstag 01 Dezember 2007 11:27:27 schrieb Patrick Matthäi: Hello Maintainers, I'm searching for a new maintainer for the orphaned package clanlib. Here are some informations about the package: WNPP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=414533 p.d.o: http://packages.debian.org/clanlib PTS: http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clanlib.html Upstream Version: 0.8 Maintainer Version: 0.6.5-1-4 I need this package maintained and in version 0.8, because I want to maintain trophy and on the other hand, it's for some other applications outdated, too. I think I haven't got enough experience yet to maintain such a library package, maybe later, but not at the moment. So hopefully someone will adopt it. :) FWIW Sam already packaged the new upstream version [1] inside the games team (CC'ed), but didn't upload it yet since it would break rdepends. Any news here? Cheers, Stefan. -- [1]: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/2007-April/003286.html> And why he hasn't set the ownership of the wnpp bug to himself and renamed it as an ITP one? -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/
Re: Orphaned clanlib package
Barry deFreese schrieb: Patrick Matthäi wrote: Stefan Potyra schrieb: Hi, Am Samstag 01 Dezember 2007 11:27:27 schrieb Patrick Matthäi: Hello Maintainers, I'm searching for a new maintainer for the orphaned package clanlib. Here are some informations about the package: WNPP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=414533 p.d.o: http://packages.debian.org/clanlib PTS: http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clanlib.html Upstream Version: 0.8 Maintainer Version: 0.6.5-1-4 I need this package maintained and in version 0.8, because I want to maintain trophy and on the other hand, it's for some other applications outdated, too. I think I haven't got enough experience yet to maintain such a library package, maybe later, but not at the moment. So hopefully someone will adopt it. :) FWIW Sam already packaged the new upstream version [1] inside the games team (CC'ed), but didn't upload it yet since it would break rdepends. Any news here? Cheers, Stefan. -- [1]: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/2007-April/003286.html> And why he hasn't set the ownership of the wnpp bug to himself and renamed it as an ITP one? -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/ Patrick, Right now both clanbomber and epiphany use clanlib. I have tried to build both of them with 0.8 without much success. I know there is a clanbomber2 available that doesn't use clanlib but not sure about epiphany. You are certainly welcome to help get clanbomber and/or epiphany working with 0.8. :-) I'll even post the new clanlib somewhere for you if you wish. Thanks, Barry deFreese But I think this is a wrong solution. We're talking about a package, which will be delivered to unstable. It's for testing etc. I think there are more than the package trophy that are waiting for clanlib 0.8. And I think this topic hasn't got any discussion topic, because it's currently simply "unmaintained". I've added my sponsor Michael Koch to CC, because maybe he thinks I could maintain this or not and maybe he knows any solution for this orphaned package. -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Orphaned clanlib package
Barry deFreese schrieb: Patrick Matthäi wrote: Barry deFreese schrieb: Patrick Matthäi wrote: Stefan Potyra schrieb: Hi, Am Samstag 01 Dezember 2007 11:27:27 schrieb Patrick Matthäi: Hello Maintainers, I'm searching for a new maintainer for the orphaned package clanlib. Here are some informations about the package: WNPP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=414533 p.d.o: http://packages.debian.org/clanlib PTS: http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clanlib.html Upstream Version: 0.8 Maintainer Version: 0.6.5-1-4 I need this package maintained and in version 0.8, because I want to maintain trophy and on the other hand, it's for some other applications outdated, too. I think I haven't got enough experience yet to maintain such a library package, maybe later, but not at the moment. So hopefully someone will adopt it. :) FWIW Sam already packaged the new upstream version [1] inside the games team (CC'ed), but didn't upload it yet since it would break rdepends. Any news here? Cheers, Stefan. -- [1]: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/2007-April/003286.html> And why he hasn't set the ownership of the wnpp bug to himself and renamed it as an ITP one? -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/ Patrick, Right now both clanbomber and epiphany use clanlib. I have tried to build both of them with 0.8 without much success. I know there is a clanbomber2 available that doesn't use clanlib but not sure about epiphany. You are certainly welcome to help get clanbomber and/or epiphany working with 0.8. :-) I'll even post the new clanlib somewhere for you if you wish. Thanks, Barry deFreese But I think this is a wrong solution. We're talking about a package, which will be delivered to unstable. It's for testing etc. I think there are more than the package trophy that are waiting for clanlib 0.8. And I think this topic hasn't got any discussion topic, because it's currently simply "unmaintained". I've added my sponsor Michael Koch to CC, because maybe he thinks I could maintain this or not and maybe he knows any solution for this orphaned package. Maybe I'm not explaining myself. The package *is* maintained and is in the Games Team SVN and is pretty much ready to upload. If you upload it, you immediately break clanbomber and epiphany. (Though I'm trying to build epiphany 0.7.0 right now which does not use clanlib). You still have clanbomber to worry about. Someone is either going to have to fix clanbomber to work with clanlib 0.8 or package up clanbomber2 (And I haven't investigated enough yet to know if it is just a re-write without clanlib or if it is a different game altogether). Thanks, Barry deFreese I'm sorry, but I'm interested to see trophy work :) It's nice to see, that someone is realy working on this package. But for fucking sake, he has to take the ownership of the WNPP bug and have to rename it to ITP: *... -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Orphaned clanlib package
Michael Koch schrieb: On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 07:30:02PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: We're talking about a package, which will be delivered to unstable. It's for testing etc. I think there are more than the package trophy that are waiting for clanlib 0.8. And I think this topic hasn't got any discussion topic, because it's currently simply "unmaintained". I've added my sponsor Michael Koch to CC, because maybe he thinks I could maintain this or not and maybe he knows any solution for this orphaned package. Maybe I'm not explaining myself. The package *is* maintained and is in the Games Team SVN and is pretty much ready to upload. If you upload it, you immediately break clanbomber and epiphany. (Though I'm trying to build epiphany 0.7.0 right now which does not use clanlib). You still have clanbomber to worry about. Someone is either going to have to fix clanbomber to work with clanlib 0.8 or package up clanbomber2 (And I haven't investigated enough yet to know if it is just a re-write without clanlib or if it is a different game altogether). Thanks, Barry deFreese I'm sorry, but I'm interested to see trophy work :) It's nice to see, that someone is realy working on this package. But for fucking sake, he has to take the ownership of the WNPP bug and have to rename it to ITP: *... Please cool down and take a deep breath. The world is cool. The package is maintained. And there are reasons to not imidiately upload a new upstream version package. ;-) Cheers, Michael I'm sorry that I've become a little bit aggressive. I was disappeared, that I've searched for a new maintainer and that I've worked too a little bit on this package and then I've get an answer, that it will be maintained, without no notification on WNPP. So I think we could close this discussion and wait on the results of the new maintainer :) Good evening! -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/
Re: Orphaned clanlib package
Barry deFreese schrieb: Patrick Matthäi wrote: Michael Koch schrieb: I'm sorry, but I'm interested to see trophy work :) It's nice to see, that someone is realy working on this package. But for fucking sake, he has to take the ownership of the WNPP bug and have to rename it to ITP: *... Please cool down and take a deep breath. The world is cool. The package is maintained. And there are reasons to not imidiately upload a new upstream version package. ;-) Cheers, Michael I'm sorry that I've become a little bit aggressive. I was disappeared, that I've searched for a new maintainer and that I've worked too a little bit on this package and then I've get an answer, that it will be maintained, without no notification on WNPP. So I think we could close this discussion and wait on the results of the new maintainer :) Good evening! -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/ No worries, believe me, I understand the frustration some times!!! If you are interested, I have posted a source package for clanlib 0.8 built from our svn here: http://www.bddebian.com/packages/debian/clanlib/ if you want to play with it. Thanks, Barry deFreese Much thanks :) Sorry for that I was a little bit frustrated. I think I can play with it and do some work on trophy ;) Good evening! -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-geoip (updated package)
Michael Mende schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.0-1 of my package "libapache2-mod-geoip". It builds these binary packages: libapache2-mod-geoip - GeoIP support for apache2 The package appears to be lintian iand linda clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 400980 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-geoip - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-geoip/libapache2-mod-geoip_1.2.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me, feel free to add yourself to uploaders field if you want. I've done a little review on your package. Could you please fix following things: - Upgrade compat to 5. - The right section is web, not net. - The dependency on debhelper should be 5, not 4. - The debian/libapache2-mod-geop.dirs and the call of dh_installdirs isn't needed - Please begin a new starting sentence in debian/changelog with a capitalized letter ;) Regards, Patrick Matthäi -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: mcl
Philipp Benner schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mcl". * Package name: mcl Version : 1:06-058-1 Upstream Author : Stijn van Dongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://micans.org/mcl/ * License : GPL-2 Section : math The MCL package is an implementation of the MCL algorithm, and offers utilities for manipulating sparse matrices (the essential data structure in the MCL algorithm) and conducting cluster experiments. MCL is currently being used in sciences like biology (protein family detection, genomics), computer science (node clustering in Peer-to-Peer networks), and linguistics (text analysis). It builds these binary packages: mcl- the Markov Cluster algorithm mcl-doc- documentation for mcl The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 452405 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mc - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mcl/mcl_06-058-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Hello Philipp, I've just done a little review, could you please fix following things: - Upgrade compat from 4 to 5. - In some files are useless newlines at the end of the file, please remove them. - Could you please clear unneeded comments out of the debian/rules? - debian/dirs isn't needed. - Please add the Homepage field to the control file. - I think you should use the Priority 'optional' instead of 'extra'. - You should use a build-depend on debhelper in version 5 and higher instead of 4. So that's my little list, I hope it will help you. Regards, Patrick Matthäi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: nettee
Joel Franco schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nettee". * Package name: nettee Version : 0.1.8-1 Upstream Author : David Mathog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://saf.bio.caltech.edu/nettee.html * License : GPLv2 Section : net It builds these binary packages: nettee - a network "tee" program The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 458819 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nettee - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nettee/nettee_0.1.8-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Joel Franco Guzmán Hello, I'm not a developer, but I had a look at the package and I think you should fix the following little things: * Please remove in debian/rules all not needed comments * .. and also outcommented debhelper programms, like # dh_installinit * Remove in debian/rules not needed calls of debhelper programms, like dh_link, you don't set anywhere links. * I think you should rewrite your debian/copyright, see for example serverstats or webissues in lenny/sid. * Please note, that this programm is GPL-2, not GPL (.. any later version.. ) I hope I could help you. :) -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SONAME support
Hello maintainers, I'm maintaining the package guichan, which is missing in the current 0.7.1 upstream release any kind of SONAME support. Now the upstream of guichan said to me, that he will add it to the next release. What have I to do if upstream provides it? Currently guichan in 0.7.1 has rdepends, so it would be good, if the old package could be in the pool first, too. Should I change in control the Source name of the package then for example to 0.8 and the packagename itself to libguichan0.8 or have I to do more things? -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-Dev.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: vexim
Daniel Knabl schrieb:
> hi folks,
>
>
> the original tarball can be found here:
> * http://www.silverwraith.com/vexim/vexim2.2.1.tar.gz
You should punch the Upstream Author the next time he will make an new
release, he missed to remove the .svn directories.
>
> any hints and tips are really welcome, also suggestions for further
> improvement and features.
>
Okay some hints from myself:
* patches: Why did you called every patch with '01_'? I think you
should count them in an normal way (01, 02, 03 etc.).
Also your DP: lines are very very short and uninformative. You
should describe it an little bit more.
* Closing bugs: Yes your way will work but I would prefer if you
would remove the trailing 'Bug' from it, this seems very ugly.
* control: Is it *realy* right, that vexim-pgsql needs the php5-mysql
extension? This seems like to fast copy & paste for me ;)
Also there are some useless depends, for example:
libapache2-mod-php5 | php5-cgi
Have a look at the 'php5' package, this will do the job for you.
Does it realy only work with apache{1,2} and lighthttpd? If not,
the depends should look like: apache2 | httpd
Also why do you depend on mysql-server / postgresql? Can't I use an
external one? You should just depend on the clients and set the
server ones as recommends or suggests.
* rules: Hm okay some useless debhelper calls and the problems which
Bernhard Link already stated. But you should seriously remove
dh_strip from the arch-independ target, this is quite wrong.
Also you should include dpatch (see for example cuetools or sbnc),
then you just need to add an "unpatch" and "patch" call in your
rules.
Also there are in many files many useless whitespaces at EOL and
newlines at EOF. ;)
So no more time today.. Good luck with it and I hope it will help you.
>
>
> many thanks in advance
> Daniel
>
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: xtod
Stefan Ritter schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > Here not: W: xtod: binary-without-manpage usr/games/xtod W: xtod source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.8.0) Hello, I think I'll just begin :) * Any reason why it's an native package? I can't see anyone. * I think it will build fine on more architectures than on i386. * There are some useless whitespaces at EOL: $ grep -r \ $ *|wc -l => 5 * .. also newlines at EOF. * To minimize the debian/rules you should remove outcommented debhelpers and some other template lines. * debian/dirs is in this case useless, the install target creates them. * s/Copyright/Copyright:/ in debian/copyright * It's better to include the point of the full GPL text after the GPL header of the xtod package in debian/copyright. * An extra whitespace in the short description? * Okay that's hard to do.. Could you provide a more describtive long-desc? :) Okay enough for the first review :) -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packaging for wine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > hello, > > i'd like to package (separately) some windows applications that run nice > under wine. Hello, first thanks for trying to make Debian better and better. But I've to say that I disagree with the idea to package applications which need wine to run, so on pure Windows applications. Why I disagree? We are here on GNU/Linux, not Window - so on we should concentrate ourself on software which runs nativly on Linux platforms, wine should be only a fallback solution. Maybe some software developers could also think "Why should I port my app to another platform than Windows, wine could also do my job?" - this could damage the availbility of nativly available software for Linux if everyone starts to wrap their applications about wine and we support this with packaging them. Do not feel blamed please, that's just my personal opinion, not more or less and btw. I don't hate wine. :) -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packaging for wine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > hello, > > i'd like to package (separately) some windows applications that run nice > under wine. Hello, first thanks for trying to make Debian better and better. But I've to say that I disagree with the idea to package applications which need wine to run, so on pure Windows applications. Why I disagree? We are here on GNU/Linux, not Window - so on we should concentrate ourself on software which runs nativly on Linux platforms, wine should be only a fallback solution. Maybe some software developers could also think "Why should I port my app to another platform than Windows, wine could also do my job?" - this could damage the availbility of nativly available software for Linux if everyone starts to wrap their applications about wine and we support this with packaging them. Do not feel blamed please, that's just my personal opinion, not more or less and btw. I don't hate wine. :) -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packaging for wine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > hello, > > i'd like to package (separately) some windows applications that run nice > under wine. Hello, first thanks for trying to make Debian better and better. But I've to say that I disagree with the idea to package applications which need wine to run, so on pure Windows applications. Why I disagree? We are here on GNU/Linux, not Window - so on we should concentrate ourself on software which runs nativly on Linux platforms, wine should be only a fallback solution. Maybe some software developers could also think "Why should I port my app to another platform than Windows, wine could also do my job?" - this could damage the availbility of nativly available software for Linux if everyone starts to wrap their applications about wine and we support this with packaging them. Do not feel blamed please, that's just my personal opinion, not more or less and btw. I don't hate wine. :) -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packaging for wine
Bertrand Marc schrieb: > Hi, > > Did you thought about packaging PlayOnLinux [1] and then create the > scripts you need for PlayOnLinux ? POL is a GNU/Linux application > released under GPL, so I think it has its place in Debian. And it > provides a nice and clean way to install Windows applications using Wine. > > [1] http://www.playonlinux.com/ > This sounds good. :) -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: php-geoip (updated package)
Sergey B Kirpichev schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.5-1 > of my package "php-geoip". > > It builds these binary packages: > php5-geoip - GeoIP module for php5 > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php-geoip > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php-geoip/php-geoip_1.0.5-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > > I had a look in your package and this makes me a headache: php-geoip (1.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. Fix security issue: + formatting bug in phpinfo() >From the upstream changelog: * Small bug in phpinfo() when printing version number could crash PHP. So on a local/remote attacker could crash PHP (also the webserver?) by just using phpinfo()? I CCed the security team and this fix should also go in to Lenny and your urgency should be bumped to something higher than low. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: patrick.matth...@web.de Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: php-geoip (updated package)
Sergey B Kirpichev schrieb: > В Чтв, 25/12/2008 в 19:08 +0100, Stefan Fritsch пишет: >> But looking at the diff between 1.0.3 and 1.0.5 and at >> http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/geoip/geoip.c?r1=1.21&r2=1.22 , it >> seems the crash bug was only introduced in 1.0.4, which was never >> released. So there is nothing to fix in lenny. >> >> But thanks for the notice, anyway. > > Ok. That's my mistake. I have fixed the changelog entry. > Updated package: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php-geoip/php-geoip_1.0.5-1.dsc Okay thanks. I would sponsor it if I am a DD yet. :-) -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: patrick.matth...@web.de Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: furl
Jonathan Wiltshire schrieb: > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:37:37PM +, Neil Williams wrote: >>> What if not? They stay open till someone else >>> tries to package it and gets rejected? >> If there is no good reason to turn an RFP into an ITP and thence into >> an upload, there is no reason to leave the RFP open. > > I think perhaps the question was as much 'who should check the list and > close useless ones', and whilst there isn't neccessarily anyone who > _should_ be doing it, there's no reason prospective developers _can't_ > do it. Just make sure you annotate your closure with some reasoning, so > that the requestor doesn't just re-open the RFP. We have many packages which are providing the same functionality. I think in *most* cases the requestor has a reason for his RFP, for example he is using itself and find it usefull, there may be more reasons. I think packages should not be rejected just because they provide "duplicated" functions. But yeah, who realy decides which RFP requests are realy sensless and should be closed? Anyway we are here off topic, this should be discussed on another list, thanks. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: patrick.matth...@web.de Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: blueman
Christopher Schramm schrieb:
> Jelle de Jong wrote:
>> I agree this package is welcome in debian, somebody fancy to sponser?
>
> Since nobody was yet: Is there any problem with sponsoring the package?
>
I think I would sponsor it, if you fix the following things:
* Is there a need for a native package? I do not think so.
* debian/prerm seems to be useless at the moment, it should be removed
* debian/control:
- wraped lines are fine but I think you may fit them to a 80x terminal
size, at the moment it is a bit bloated in my eyes
- Standards-Version is out of date
- You are using debhelper, but you are not adding ${misc:Depends}
- (not tested) Are the replaces, conflicts with bluez-gnome *realy* needed?
- Some useless whitespaces at EOL.
* debian/copyright:
- You may add your own copyright for your packaging.
- There are much more different copyright holders for different files
which are not listed there, try it e.g. with grep -r Copyright *|sort|less
- There are also some more missing licenses (GPL3, GPL-2+, GPL-2) in
the package which are not mentioned in the debian/copyright file
* Package building:
The build FTBFS. You are build depending on libbluetooth-dev (>= 4.0)
but in unstable there is just version 3.36-1.
At all (also if the packages would build) it would be rejected by the
ftp-masters, because of the incomplete debian/copyright and useless
native package.
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gphotofs (QA upload of an orphaned package)
Rogério Brito schrieb: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gphotofs/gphotofs_0.3-2.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Uploaded. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: blueman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Schramm schrieb: > Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> I think I would sponsor it, if you fix the following things: > > Sure. :-) > >> * Is there a need for a native package? I do not think so. > > No. I just thought that would be the right thing to do, if there are no > changes in source. Changed it. No, it should be also an non-native package and you should never made changes to the source itself, just about a patchsystem (debian/patches/). > >> - (not tested) Are the replaces, conflicts with bluez-gnome *realy* needed? > > After some examination I think conflicts could be removed, but isn't > replaces a good thing? Could both packages are installed and used at the same time? Then it would be wrong to add conflicts and replaces. > >> - There are much more different copyright holders for different files >> which are not listed there, try it e.g. with grep -r Copyright *|sort|less >> - There are also some more missing licenses (GPL3, GPL-2+, GPL-2) in >> the package which are not mentioned in the debian/copyright file > > I see... And the all have to be put in debian/copyright? Isn't that > going to be a bit bloated? Yes, everything has to be in it, look e.g. at the package tork => debian/copyright, this is the realy hard part of Debian packaging ;-) > >> * Package building: >> The build FTBFS. You are build depending on libbluetooth-dev (>= 4.0) >> but in unstable there is just version 3.36-1. > > I know. Blueman is an applet for bluez4, which has not yet made it to > Debian. I tried to find out who's working on that, but couldn't find any > of the related packages (libbluetooth-dev (>= 4.0), libbluetooth3, > bluez...) on WNPP. Can I not be compiled and used with the current unstable one? If not the package is not ready for sponsoring, yet, first it has to build correctly. > Uploaded a new version. I think the only thing to target is the > copyright file. > > Thanks for your help and possible sponsoring! I will look in it, if you also fixed the other points, thanks. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknyAhsACgkQ2XA5inpabMe9nwCdFaWVpMGffLBLTKR+o85l/+EA WQAAniCH+R1qR6YhVVDlIQk/KHAz9EMS =b+Mt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: fizmo (new package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Ender schrieb:
>
>
> Dear debian mentors,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload my new package "fizmo". This is a
> Z-Machine
> interpreter, which may be used to play Infocom / Inform games. For
> screenshots
> and general information, please refer to
> http://spellbreaker.org/~chrender/fizmo/.
>
> Name: fizmo
> License: BSD
> Fixes ITP bug number: 525490
> Description:
> Fizmo is a Z-Machine interpreter ("Fizmo Interprets Z-Machine Opcodes")
> which
> allows you to run Infocom- and most other Z-Machine based games -- except
> version 6 -- on POSIX-like systems which provide a ncursesw (note the "w")
> library. It has been successfully compiled on Debian based Linux, Mac OS X
> (with MacPorts providing ncursesw) and Windows (using Cygwin and a self-
> compiled ncursesw library). This is a "console"-style application,
> meaning that
> it runs in textmode and does not provide any GUI whatsoever. About
> Infocom and
> interactive fiction in general, see the "New to IF" section at
> http://www.ifarchive.org.
>
> The package is available from:
> - http://spellbreaker.org/~chrender/fizmo/deb-upstream/fizmo_0.6.2-1.dsc
> -
> http://spellbreaker.org/~chrender/fizmo/deb-upstream/fizmo_0.6.2-1.diff.gz
> -
> http://spellbreaker.org/~chrender/fizmo/deb-upstream/fizmo_0.6.2.orig.tar.gz
>
>
> lintian shows no warnings when run as "lintian -Ivi". For testing
> purposes, game files
> may be found at
> http://www.ifarchive.org/indexes/if-archiveXgamesXzcode.html
> It would be nice if someone would look into the package.
Hello,
I found following issues:
- - Out of date Standards-Version (current is 3.8.1).
- - You manual adding library dependencies to the package, you should use
${shlib:Depends} and while you are using debhelper also ${misc:Depends}
and drop those hardcoded depends, this is wrong.
- - You are continueing from the short to the long description, but the
long description is a single "field".
- - You could drop from debian/rules most outcommented stuff, so that it
is easier to read
Hmm the copying of the package also does not make me very happy.. an
"All rights reserved", no copyright headers in the source files, hmm
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkny7+EACgkQ2XA5inpabMfUhwCgjmI7SX+Cr0lmvcOGeCtLhKFM
sBIAoKmReSuP5dlsgiPrWXqKKaUoWYOi
=8IHA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: fizmo (new package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Matthäi schrieb:
> Christoph Ender schrieb:
>
>> Dear debian mentors,
>
>> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload my new package "fizmo". This is a
>> Z-Machine
>> interpreter, which may be used to play Infocom / Inform games. For
>> screenshots
>> and general information, please refer to
>> http://spellbreaker.org/~chrender/fizmo/.
>
>> Name: fizmo
>> License: BSD
>> Fixes ITP bug number: 525490
>> Description:
>> Fizmo is a Z-Machine interpreter ("Fizmo Interprets Z-Machine Opcodes")
>> which
>> allows you to run Infocom- and most other Z-Machine based games -- except
>> version 6 -- on POSIX-like systems which provide a ncursesw (note the "w")
>> library. It has been successfully compiled on Debian based Linux, Mac OS X
>> (with MacPorts providing ncursesw) and Windows (using Cygwin and a self-
>> compiled ncursesw library). This is a "console"-style application,
>> meaning that
>> it runs in textmode and does not provide any GUI whatsoever. About
>> Infocom and
>> interactive fiction in general, see the "New to IF" section at
>> http://www.ifarchive.org.
>
>> The package is available from:
>> - http://spellbreaker.org/~chrender/fizmo/deb-upstream/fizmo_0.6.2-1.dsc
>> -
>> http://spellbreaker.org/~chrender/fizmo/deb-upstream/fizmo_0.6.2-1.diff.gz
>> -
>> http://spellbreaker.org/~chrender/fizmo/deb-upstream/fizmo_0.6.2.orig.tar.gz
>
>
>> lintian shows no warnings when run as "lintian -Ivi". For testing
>> purposes, game files
>> may be found at
>> http://www.ifarchive.org/indexes/if-archiveXgamesXzcode.html
>> It would be nice if someone would look into the package.
>
> Hello,
>
> I found following issues:
>
> - Out of date Standards-Version (current is 3.8.1).
> - You manual adding library dependencies to the package, you should use
> ${shlib:Depends} and while you are using debhelper also ${misc:Depends}
> and drop those hardcoded depends, this is wrong.
> - You are continueing from the short to the long description, but the
> long description is a single "field".
> - You could drop from debian/rules most outcommented stuff, so that it
> is easier to read
>
> Hmm the copying of the package also does not make me very happy.. an
> "All rights reserved", no copyright headers in the source files, hmm
>
And I forgot:
I: fizmo source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
W: fizmo source: dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
P: fizmo source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system config.mk
I: fizmo: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkny8PMACgkQ2XA5inpabMfuGwCgi3J5xT6vIf5Rxqt+fA9bVvZK
yI4AnjNT/KurbTjrYrlEzJreXOEBkuZ1
=Bjjh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Copyright holders listed in ‘debian/copyrig ht’
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Finney schrieb: > There is vagueness in the Policy and significant disagreement among > developers over whether ‘debian/copyright’ actually needs to list all > the work's copyright holders and statements. Current practice in many > packages leans toward “no”, while actions of (some of?) the ftpmasters > leans toward “yes”. > > I don't know which way this is going to resolve, but it's good to be > aware that the position Patrick espouses may or may not represent > consensus of the Debian project. Yes I am aware of the current discussion, but some (2?) packages have been rejected in the last months because of an incomplete/missing copyright holder listing. So it is `at the moment' better to include them if you want to have an ACCEPT. But I also want to see a good general consensus of it.. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknzF4cACgkQ2XA5inpabMcXDQCgktIrpVc0OUziwB18JhHzC3Sz 1wEAoJH27DtlR9G+U2G/ygIMfyUpJk5V =3/9D -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: fizmo (new package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Ender schrieb:
>
> Hello,
Hello,
>
> first of all, thanks for taking time to look into the package. I've
> tried to address all
> the issues and I think everything's fixed. There's only one exception:
> It sounds
> like having an "All rights reserved" in the copyright is a problem, but
> since this term
> is also present in /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD I've let it there for
> the moment.
So it is okay, but could you please also refer to the
common-licenses/BSD file in debian/copyright and there is also one
missing copyright in debian/copyright for the file:
src/fizmo/mt19937a.c
Please add it.
Then the last issue:
P: fizmo source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system config.mk
You should use a patch system for the file, that is everything from me :)
> On 25.04.2009 on 13:11 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
>> Hello, I found following issues:
>> - - Out of date Standards-Version (current is 3.8.1).
>> - - You manual adding library dependencies to the package, you should use
>> ${shlib:Depends} and while you are using debhelper also ${misc:Depends}
>> and drop those hardcoded depends, this is wrong.
>> - - You are continueing from the short to the long description, but the
>> long description is a single "field".
>> - - You could drop from debian/rules most outcommented stuff, so that it
>> is easier to read
>> Hmm the copying of the package also does not make me very happy.. an
>> "All rights reserved", no copyright headers in the source files, hmm
>
>
> On 25.04.2009 on 13:16 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> And I forgot:
>>
>> I: fizmo source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
>> W: fizmo source: dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
>> P: fizmo source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system config.mk
>> I: fizmo: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright
>
>
>> Christoph Ender schrieb:
>>> Dear debian mentors,
>>> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload my new package "fizmo". This is a
>>> Z-Machine interpreter, which may be used to play Infocom / Inform
>>> games. [...]
>
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkn0OkUACgkQ2XA5inpabMf0oQCfX4aQLpMe/+LNV6uLi6fTz35h
twMAniA6BgAdYBGjnBeZVMz7OBS3Pg/q
=C8Pg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: fizmo (new package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christoph Ender schrieb: > I've modified debian/rules so that config.mk doesn't have to be > included in the diff any longer. Thanks a lot for reminding me > about the mt19937 issue :-). I've put the copyright notice into > debian/copyright. Uploaded. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn0mPEACgkQ2XA5inpabMdtYACgkSUu6aiBMmeArZKBCaPJL+4V QdQAoJsN8NMI9UeXrQ/tt38HqC7xcSGw =fbu9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: kio-ftps (updated package)
Laurent Léonard schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2+dfsg-1 ... The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kio-ftps - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kio-ftps/kio-ftps_0.2+dfsg-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Uploaded. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: bosh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Salvatore Bonaccorso schrieb: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bosh > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bosh/bosh_0.6-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Uploaded. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAkn8DiQACgkQ2XA5inpabMfXMQCcC3guEFnTK73AE5v1KSM+eXQS NUUAmMPn6cls9fH2e7azeKUJHU878MA= =3SKA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gtk-theme-switch (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Denis Briand schrieb: > nobody interesting in this package to upload it? > > best regards > > Denis Briand > > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 08:21:57PM +0200, Denis Briand wrote: >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.6 >> of package "gtk-theme-switch". >> It's an orphaned package and I intend to adopt it. >> >> It builds these binary packages: >> gtk-theme-switch - GTK+ theme switching utility >> >> The package appears to be lintian clean. >> >> The upload would fix these bugs: 229384, 319286, 462908, 498447 >> >> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: >> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtk-theme-switch >> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable >> main contrib non-free >> - dget >> >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtk-theme-switch/gtk-theme-switch_2.0.6.dsc >> >> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. >> >> Kind regards >> Denis Briand >> > > Uploaded. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn8HYEACgkQ2XA5inpabMfjmACgmJGf7gIX8rSB9JChefyqTE8v TQ0Anjgzpq5uFtsuFkG94myRr9mcGGeT =9DMx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gtk-theme-switch (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Wise schrieb: > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >> Uploaded. > > Don't you have some comments on the package? At the very least you > could have mentioned that it should not be a native package. > - From the changelog: gtk-theme-switch (2.0.1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream (me) release. Becomes Debian native. .. - -- Joshua Kwan Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:31:55 -0700 Since this release it is maintained as a Debian native package. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn8INEACgkQ2XA5inpabMcYwACeMl6qDj4rjOooqoGFRA+7LoU4 zi8AnRBMaeAXxAhUz5Wb+FY7lLWREK0a =jVBA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: fswebcam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Luca Niccoli schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fswebcam", a command line > program to take pictures from a webcam. > It's a small package, so it shouldn't take long to check (grin) > I find the program really handy, taking pictures from a webcam is > easier, neater than ever, and most importantly, It Works(tm), and it > does it out-of-the-box (all the similar programs I have tried in > Debian don't work with cheap webcams that don't support MJPEG). > It's very easily scriptable, which is why I looked at it in the first > place: if you want to take a picture of yourself every time you turn > on your > laptop, just to turn back when your 50+ and see how uglier you've got > with time, this is all you need... > I've been in contact with upstream and he's very responsive; a new > version is supposed to be released sometimes in 2009. > > * Package name: fswebcam > Version : 20070108-2 > Upstream Author : Philip Heron > * URL : http://www.firestorm.cx/fswebcam/ > * License : GPLv2 > Section : graphics > > It builds these binary packages: > fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program > > Fswebcam is a tiny and flexible webcam command-line program for capturing > images from a V4L1/V4L2 device. It accepts a number of formats, can skip > the first (possibly bad) frames before performing the actual capture, and > can perform simple manipulation on the captured image, such as resizing, > averaging multiple frames or overlaying a caption or an image. > > The package appears to be lintian clean and builds with pdebuild. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fswebcam > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fswebcam/fswebcam_20070108-2.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Kind regards > Luca Niccoli > > Hello, could you please fix following: * debian/changelog: It is the initial release in Debian but it is containing some more versions and builds, also the initial debian revision starts with -2, please bump it to -1. * debian/control: There are some more trailing whitespaces in the long-desc, please remove them. * debian/copyright: - - line 39+40: please refer to the full path of the right license. Please note: I haven't done a full license+copyright check, yet. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn8bAMACgkQ2XA5inpabMdmRQCdFQKupcyqMDkhvgIoV2k3TD6O tXMAnA4eTiWcbGegV6YcB8zK1ukLqz1L =zf+W -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gtk-theme-switch (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Williams schrieb: > On Sat, 2 May 2009 12:57:33 +0200 > Denis Briand wrote: > >> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:35:14PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Since this release it is maintained as a Debian native package. >>> That doesn't mean it is correct to do so :) >> Hello, >> Thank you for the upload. >> I can put it in non-native package for futur version if it cause some >> trouble. >> I let it in native because it was in native since 2004. >> The upstream is dead. > > Just because upstream is dead and you have become the de facto upstream > by packaging it for Debian, does not mean that the package is native to > Debian. It is still a non-native package - just that it's one that only > exists in Debian and has a Debian maintainer in upstream. That is > exactly the same situation as drivel, pilot-qof and gpe-expenses are > for me, but those are still non-native packages because they can (and > do) work on other distributions. The fact that they were not originally > available on anything other than Debian is irrelevant. > > Native packages are a special case and should not be abused. > Hi Neil, we solved it on IRC, it will be changed with the next release. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn8jCEACgkQ2XA5inpabMfUqQCeIC9gFO6R7eH1uHnJWgiraibx uYMAnRw3LuLacEgdsCf3RuJHmLBO6AOd =jlxr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: fswebcam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Luca Niccoli schrieb: >> Depending on the answer to the above, I may sponsor it - one step I > > At the moment Patrick is doing an extensive review of it, so it would > be doubled work I guess. > If he won't be able/willing to sponsor it, I will ask again, thanks! Okay it is uploaded now. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn9cBQACgkQ2XA5inpabMc+jACfT25T39rhpZLY1JlqOko2pAHi ubsAoJiOBcZz0OSvflGBGe3XPIcrA20S =2Yo+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: drraw -- a simple web based presentation front-end for RRDtool [3rd try]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "drraw". It is a simple yet > powerful tool for producing graphs out of RRD files and showing them > on the web. > > I guess I've done a tolerable work of packaging it. However this is my > first package an I need your advice and sponsorship for starting to > contribute back to my favorite OS. > > My previous tries didn't get any reply. At least please guide me what > to do to have your notice! > > You may find history of drraw Debian package sources at > http://bitbucket.org/ebrahim/drraw/ . > > * Package name: drraw > Version : 2.1.3-2 > Upstream Author : Christophe Kalt > * URL : http://web.taranis.org/drraw/ > * License : BSD > Section : web > > It builds this binary package: > drraw - A simple web based presentation front-end for RRDtool > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > Here is long description of the package: > drraw is a simple web based presentation front-end for RRDtool that allows you > to interactively build graphs of your own design. A graph definition can be > turned into a template which may be applied to many Round Robin Database > files. > drraw specializes in providing an easy mean of displaying data stored with > RRDtool and does not care about how the data is collected, making it a great > complement to other RRDtool front-ends. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drraw > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drraw/drraw_2.1.3-2.dsc Hello, I found following: * debian/changelog: - - It is not a must, but in my opinion it is cleaner if you completly remove the -2 revision and -1 is your first initial upload. * debian/control: - - Out of date standards version * debian/copyright: - - You might refresh the year of your own copyright ;) * debian/dirs: - - The first three entrys are unneeded * debian/patches/*.dpatch: - - Your patch descriptions are like "Patch for ", could you please describe there, what they are doing - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAkn/KQ8ACgkQ2XA5inpabMdBcACYxz89oJhK0U5cHhej1B54mR4k eACfc9gZWfGIWYhMwSJWtlriO5LSSm8= =ACpi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Lintian clean?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Russ Allbery schrieb: > Paul Wise writes: > >> I'd like a buildd network for mentors so we can check for FTBFS, >> lintian warnings etc on other architectures. > > Given that anyone can upload packages to mentors, this seems like a > fairly worrisome security risk. Why that? It may be implemented as the current Debian buildd network. OpenSuSE is also providing such a buildd service for their users, but yeah, we need more buildd servers for that (if the pkgs should be realy build for every arch). - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn/SqcACgkQ2XA5inpabMdkBACfc0UjavHaVT7qQPqUADNtVXvG mboAn2eWr3GsP0wMn7HPYSeHT0VosH8D =GrzB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: drraw -- a simple web based presentation front-end for RRDtool [3rd try]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah schrieb: > 3. Please check the fixed version: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drraw/drraw_2.1.3-3.dsc There seems to be a problem with your orig.tar.gz: dpkg-source: error: File ./drraw_2.1.3.orig.tar.gz has size 45970 instead of expected 45554 Please reupload. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoAYvMACgkQ2XA5inpabMcJ4QCfdzgz2+Vc5SDZ80QRUN09xZts K+gAn1qyK9HLwZlrM2D74461c67bEqvh =npZs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: sigx (second attempt)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chow Loong Jin schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sigx". > > * Package name: sigx > Version : 2.0.2-1 > Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] > * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] > * License : [fill in] > Section : devel Next time please fill them in. > The package appears to be lintian clean. No: P: libsigx-2.0-doc: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL P: libsigx-2.0-dev: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL I: libsigx-2.0-2: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libsigx-2.0.so.2.0.1 P: libsigx-2.0-2: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > > The upload would fix these bugs: 492215 > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sigx > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sigx/sigx_2.0.2-1.dsc > - gitweb: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sigx.git > - git clone git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/sigx.git > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. The rest seems clear to me, could you please fix the lintian messages, then I am willed to upload it. :) - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoAeqwACgkQ2XA5inpabMcqMQCePdI/QX19mQfLJGhjaoJ1z8m2 898AnRy9b90Sn5vQndKIvPZu7qC1Gl5b =ctvX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gmchess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vern Sun schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gmchess". > > * Package name: gmchess > Version : 0.20-1 > Upstream Author : lerosua > * URL : http://code.google.com/p/gmchess/ > * License : GPLv2 > Section : games > > It builds these binary packages: > gmchess- a Chinese Chess game using UCCI Are there any locals, so that english reading ppl. may play it? - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoAex8ACgkQ2XA5inpabMdk+QCeKH60TK4gK2g+6PiyuyGcd7FG wyYAnRsj53aJiJU/agFFIfe47wXXYF04 =WA4v -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: drraw -- a simple web based presentation front-end for RRDtool [3rd try]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah schrieb: > Fixed. > Sorry for inconvenience. Okay, it is uploaded now. Cheers. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoBlJcACgkQ2XA5inpabMcBmQCffnIZaNmG7X+4yyn+P3nUkuW8 aGAAoJEItnKa5Goz0xO+D+vrx8RyyC96 =PdU9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: libdansguardian-perl -- Module for administer dansguardian's control files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alejandro Garrido Mota schrieb: > Hi, I am new in the maillist. I need upload libdansguardian-perl and I > request your help. This is simple perl module. > > Name of package: libdansguardian-perl > License: same as Perl (Artistic or GPL-1+) > Description: Module for administer dansguardian's control files > > The package can be obtained from my personal webserver: > http://mogaal.com/paquetes/libdansguardian-perl/ Hello, please use in the next time the RFS template. The package is fine, but you may fix "libdansguardian-perl source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system Makefile.PL" before I upload it. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoFllIACgkQ2XA5inpabMckAgCdFzOozhyOoarWUjrRXnkGBcIB B4cAnjKyoRMlmbjW0zd2BlH4aExuYOs4 =yAWT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: kplayer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Palacio schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kplayer". > > * Package name: kplayer > Version : 1:0.7-1 > Upstream Author : kiriuja > * URL : http://kplayer.sourceforge.net > * License : GPL version 3 > Section : video > > It builds these binary packages: > kplayer- A KDE media player based on MPlayer > kplayer-dbg - kplayer debug symbols > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kplayer > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kplayer/kplayer_0.7-1.dsc > Hello, why is this is debian native package? This is wrong * debian/control: - - The kplayer-dbg package is in the wrong section - - The bugs field is useless here - - Please add the homepage field * debian/kplayer.install: - - The single dots are a bit useless * debian/copyright: - - You may leave your own copyright there - - The files in doc/ are licensed with the GFDL, see COPYING-DOCS * debian/patches and debian/kplayer.1: - - Have you sent them to upstream? - - Patch descriptions are missing in their f. headers Also please fix those lintian warnings: : kplayer: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/kplayer.1.gz 9: warning: `.SH' not defined P: kplayer: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL I: kplayer: desktop-entry-contains-encoding-key /usr/share/applications/kde4/kplayer.desktop:2 Encoding P: kplayer: no-homepage-field P: kplayer-dbg: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL I: kplayer-dbg: extended-description-is-probably-too-short - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoFpJwACgkQ2XA5inpabMcX6QCfQFufkoGb/qfLjuzoJmBXKZLJ BRQAn1OXdMF3Rg0/hMkZM1pmOEQdOz71 =K96H -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Looking for sponsor to upload hwinfo (Was: Fwd: Bug#495866: hwinfo: library packages are needlessly not co-installable)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 William Vera schrieb: > I already fixed all those points, you can see it at mentors: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hwinfo/ > Thanks in advance * debian/copyright: - - Missing MIT/X11 (BSD) license for src/int10/AsmMacros.h * debian/control: - - compat, debhelper and standards-version are out of date * debian/hwinfo.8: - - You are not using this file It FTBFS: gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../src/hd - -D__DRIVER__ -DFORCE_POST -D_CEXPORT= -DNO_LONG_LONG -I. -Ix86emu - -Iinclude sys.c a - x86emu_debug.o a - x86emu_decode.o a - x86emu_fpu.o a - x86emu_ops.o a - x86emu_ops2.o a - x86emu_prim_ops.o a - x86emu_sys.o make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/hwinfo-15.3/src/x86emu' make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/hwinfo-15.3/src/int10' make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/hwinfo-15.3/src/int10' make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/hwinfo-15.3/src/int10' gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd emu_vm86.c gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd i10_int.c gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd i10_io.c gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd i10_pci.c gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd - -fno-strict-aliasing i10_v86.c i10_v86.c: In function 'setup_vm86': i10_v86.c:104: error: 'VIF_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) i10_v86.c:104: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once i10_v86.c:104: error: for each function it appears in.) i10_v86.c:104: error: 'VIP_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) i10_v86.c: In function 'run_bios_int': i10_v86.c:474: error: 'VIF_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) i10_v86.c:475: error: 'IF_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) i10_v86.c:486: error: 'TF_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) i10_v86.c:486: error: 'NT_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [i10_v86.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/hwinfo-15.3/src/int10' make[2]: *** [subdirs] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/hwinfo-15.3/src' make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/hwinfo-15.3' make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoFqLwACgkQ2XA5inpabMea9QCfUPphJa1yAbnwRfLnUeLGg7Ln a44An1OhyGrQkLLAbHkjgC4itq0KzyF1 =xk+7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: include desktop file and icon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Grammostola Rosea schrieb: >> Please run desktop-file-validate on this, I can see at least two >> things wrong with it (the Encoding field and .png on the end of the >> icon name should both be removed). >> > $ desktop-file-validate phasex.desktop > bash: desktop-file-validate: command not found > It is in desktop-file-utils. See apt-file search desktop-file-validate. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoGpawACgkQ2XA5inpabMemOQCffaK2SCIH8VDkNOEFCJzGKN6R KQcAnj4r+DVoVW5tNFA4DlS97ahf8rEY =qYxg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: prerm/postinst scripts failing silently(?)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Serafeim Zanikolas schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm adopting a package that produces several binaries, and I need to adapt it
> so that every binary will have its own prerm and postinst scripts (issue
> #315318). I tried calling the scripts debian/binaryX.{prerm,postinst}, but
> they seem to be ignored when installing the binary packages (postinst calls
> update-alternatives but there is no sign of it actually being called), and I
> don't see any error messages when installing the package by hand). Attached
> are the scripts for one of the binaries.
>
> Any hints on how I could debug this?
Short answer:
Try it with set -x instead of e
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkoGp7QACgkQ2XA5inpabMfCKQCgnyPUxcU2EvQAfHONE0STdEFf
+Q0AnAiCCtdB4KMqveeB5mfdHxpZ+XpL
=Ps4l
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Subject: RFS: subtitlecomposer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 José Manuel Santamaría Lema schrieb: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subtitlecomposer > > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subtitlecomposer/subtitlecomposer_0.5.2-1.dsc > Hello, there is a missing license in your debian/copyright: ./src/main/utils/kfind_p.h: LGPL (v2,) ./src/main/utils/kreplace.cpp: LGPL (v2,) ./src/main/utils/kreplace.h: LGPL (v2,) - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoGqP4ACgkQ2XA5inpabMfb0wCgm03Rqd/of+gQMEgiT3e4eQb6 REcAnRqYCXgHOpPC/pTxO/PCbrX6RZu7 =WdVm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
> It builds these binary packages:
> libbash- a tool that enables bash dynamic-like shared libraries
> libbash-doc - user and developer documentation for libbash
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload would fix these bugs: 526739
>
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> main contrib non-free
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10b.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Hello,
* debian/control:
- - Out of date standards-version
* debian/changelog:
- - It is wrong, that the package has been made native
* debian/control:
- - Missing ${misc:Depends}
- - Why does libbash-doc depend on libbash?
- - For what do you need in an arch all only package autotools-dev as
build-depend?
* debian/rules:
- - Ehm, why do you need 1777 for var/lock/dirlock/?
* debian/libbash-doc.doc-base:
- - => Author:
* debian/copyright:
- - There is also a GPLv2 file in your source, add this license.
- - There is a missing copyright holder on lib/urlcoding.sh
Lintian:
W: libbash source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libbash
W: libbash source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libbash-doc
W: libbash source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.1)
I: libbash source: build-depends-without-arch-dep autotools-dev
I: libbash source: build-depends-without-arch-dep doxygen
E: libbash: dir-or-file-in-var-lock var/lock/dirlocks/
W: libbash: non-standard-dir-perm var/lock/dirlocks/ 1777 != 0755
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkoG+j0ACgkQ2XA5inpabMdiggCgit0uM1zdLuJcvcakRu2jTE02
tqEAoJZJzIR+lDlPqGUlyYA+JcsdlDHS
=o/fS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: >> * debian/changelog: >> - - It is wrong, that the package has been made native > Well, I'm the author of the project, and I want to debian dir to be > part of the project tree (with all of the consequences I know about > it). Does not it make it native? > I've incremented version (to "0.9.10c") to signify that its a new > version (a not packaging of 0.9.10b version that was released quite a > while ago). See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html <-- quote # When to use a native vs a non-native debian package You should only use a native Debian package when it is clear that the package would only ever be of use in Debian. Even if the software is currently only available in Debian, if someone could reasonably use the software on another distribution or on another operating system, then the package should be non-native. A few examples of normal packages are: libc6, apache, phpmyadmin. But linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are purely developed for debian, and make no sense being released in another distribution. quote --> >> - - For what do you need in an arch all only package autotools-dev as >> build-depend? > I do not understand. The policy[1] says that "all" "indicates an > architecture-independent package." Should I make it "any" instead of > "all"? No, but I see no reason why you should build-dep on it. But I personaly did not test it yet without, please do so. > The fixed package has been reuploaded to: > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=libbash > > [1] > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoHD1AACgkQ2XA5inpabMd9lQCeOTijDkyXMoO67mZFkFPuMJ+J uxYAn2nROptYaAxREqHeEa/I1XUfgdiV =ROeM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: > Can you please advice on how to create "orig" package, when debian dir > is part of the project file-tree? Do I need to checkout sources and > then just delete debian subdir, pack orig tarball, then restore debian > dir and proceed? The best solution would be, to poke upstream until he does not deliver the debian dir within his release tarballs, and while you are the upstream developer.. :) If you do not want to release again today just because of removing the tarball from your source, then do a repack and document this in debian/README.source and take care of it in the next release. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoHFycACgkQ2XA5inpabMfO1gCcCRgt0qa7ReP9o2MDAdBfU6ej aTYAoKx22DDlJg5Ft6eJMcaFa8h3YffB =GOQQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed. > All done: > 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package > is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I'll do official release (with tarballs, > etc.) as soon we'll done polishing Debian part. > 2. Yes, since package arch independent, and after reading > autotools-dev documentation, I see that its indeed should not be > required, so current package builds without it. > > Thank you, Okay nice. But the copyright holder of lib/urlcoding.sh is still missing in debian/copyright: > lib/urlcoding.sh:# Copyright (c) 2005 Alon Keren - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoHR+8ACgkQ2XA5inpabMdk8wCdGOJrYQHvePuiA81LxHHHekDV E8AAnA5WlvSdR5etDpMVqoSbfoORiX82 =GkkT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: > Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5? > I would welcome this step :) - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoHVK4ACgkQ2XA5inpabMdRhwCfcRD05J6HjPzunccKpTzRlrJd oicAniBWO6Kr8tZ5BPy0gCfdJQHkt/NC =8lnc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hai Zaar schrieb: >>> Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5? >>> >> I would welcome this step :) > All done. Reuploaded. > > Please do not upload yet - just tell me if its OK. I want to build > against officially released tarball. Could you just put the gpl-3 license header to the Files: * part please. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoIVEQACgkQ2XA5inpabMf6cQCglxgl8fBRE7qTZzcoBS1cua4F TOQAn2lvaIVqN5wOpJ2ivh25Qhtf7Vme =+Bbb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: >> Could you just put the gpl-3 license header to the Files: * part please. > What for? - I cite it later under separate License: field. It looks > like this example from DEP, isn't it?: > Example 2 (recurrent license). > > Files: src/js/editline/* > Copyright: 1993, John Doe > 1993, Joe Average > License: MPL-1.1 > > Files: src/js/fdlibm/* > Copyright: 1993, J-Random Corporation > License: MPL-1.1 > > License: MPL-1.1 > [LICENSE TEXT] > You are right, sorry. It is okay for me at whole. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoIYxYACgkQ2XA5inpabMdd8QCeNN7ViXl3zwfa3+livjwY5ThZ 7K8An1RuxVmN/5xNsNFK4xrmidzd+GAL =y0z2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
Hai Zaar schrieb: On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Hmm there are some new lintian warnings in http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10c-1.dsc I: libbash source: debian-watch-file-is-missing Oops... fixed I: libbash source: build-depends-without-arch-dep doxygen Fixed - doxygen moved to Build-Depends-Indep. Uploaded. E: libbash: dir-or-file-in-var-lock var/lock/dirlocks/ Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create requested files/dirs on boot? (Please do not tell me that I need to write init script to do it :) Wouldn't it make sense to write those lockfiles to ~/ instead of a systemwide dir? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
Hai Zaar schrieb: On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create requested files/dirs on boot? (Please do not tell me that I need to write init script to do it :) Wouldn't it make sense to write those lockfiles to ~/ instead of a systemwide dir? Some tools that use libbash (my custom app for example), run scripts as system users that do not have valid ~/ A valid point maybe also /tmp, your /var/lock/dirlocks has currently the same functions (meant as permissions) as /tmp. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gearmand
Monty Taylor schrieb: * Package name: gearmand Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : Eric Day and Brian Aker * URL : http://launchpad.net/gearmand * License : BSD Section : web Which programming languages? It builds these binary packages: gearman- A distributed job queue gearman-client - A distributed job queue gearman-server - A distributed job queue libgearman-dev - A distributed job queue libgearman0 - A distributed job queue Before I will had a lock in your package you may extend your short descriptions, they should not be the same for every package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: kplayer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Palacio schrieb: >>> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kplayer >> * debian/control: >> - The bugs field is useless here Now format is useless >> - Please add the homepage field There is a doubled http:// >> * debian/copyright: >> - You may leave your own copyright there >> - The files in doc/ are licensed with the GFDL, see COPYING-DOCS > They are not being installed. Or do you want them out of sources too? If they are in the tarball, they have to be listed in copyright. Also here is another warning: P: kplayer: experimental-to-unstable-without-comment You may add a ITP or overtake an existing and close it with your firstz initial debian upload. You also want to add a menu file. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoOigAACgkQ2XA5inpabMcACACdFOv9I41x6uGJFQiqgYP3EIQ/ 3/EAniDXLPyvfXyR1ZtHtvoUxzF9KS7v =IHum -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 William Vera schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-10 > of my package "scrot". > > It builds these binary packages: > scrot - command line screen capture utility > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 245266 > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scrot > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scrot/scrot_0.8-10.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Kind regards > William Vera > > Hello, could you please fix: I: scrot source: dpatch-missing-description 05-addfocusedmanpage.dpatch And please turn off your read confirmations for the list. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoS54gACgkQ2XA5inpabMeqFQCgrnZSLdYEs2fnFtCkI/CCMG+/ JjwAoIoJmVzb5/rHxF+9mj6mMqWanRj4 =zKmD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 William Vera schrieb: > El mar, 19-05-2009 a las 19:08 +0200, Patrick Matthäi escribió: > William Vera schrieb: >>>> Dear mentors, >>>> >>>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-10 >>>> of my package "scrot". >>>> >>>> It builds these binary packages: >>>> scrot - command line screen capture utility >>>> >>>> The package appears to be lintian clean. >>>> >>>> The upload would fix these bugs: 245266 >>>> >>>> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: >>>> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scrot >>>> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable >>>> main contrib non-free >>>> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scrot/scrot_0.8-10.dsc >>>> >>>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. >>>> >>>> Kind regards >>>> William Vera >>>> >>>> > Hello, > > >> Hi > > could you please fix: > I: scrot source: dpatch-missing-description 05-addfocusedmanpage.dpatch > >> done, is in the same URL :) > > And please turn off your read confirmations for the list. > >> done, sorry! > Uploaded. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoS8tUACgkQ2XA5inpabMfecQCghAXzRB+TIf4q/yzsfLbzYHI/ W7QAnRGIFb3In6h3vcH5axUayWOMat8j =b/w+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: upnp-inspector
Charlie Smotherman schrieb: The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/upnp-inspector - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/upnp-inspector/upnp-inspector_0.2.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Hello, here a quick review. * debian/changelog: - Your package does not close an ITP bug. - Useless whitespaces at EOL. * debian/control: - Useless whitespaces at EOL. * debian/copyright: - The copyright of the upstream is wrong. Lintian: W: python-upnp-inspector: menu-item-creates-new-section Applications/Development /usr/share/menu/python-upnp-inspector:5 Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: vfu (updated package)
William Vera schrieb:
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vfu
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vfu/vfu_4.09-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Hello,
you created a unpatch/patch target in debian/rules, which you do not
need if you include the right dpatch file in your rules, which provides
the {un}patch targets.
If you fix this, I will upload your package.
Cheers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: vfu (updated package)
Patrick Matthäi schrieb:
William Vera schrieb:
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vfu
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vfu/vfu_4.09-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Hello,
you created a unpatch/patch target in debian/rules, which you do not
need if you include the right dpatch file in your rules, which provides
the {un}patch targets.
Last but not least I forget:
P: vfu source: debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing line 11
Delete the doubled whitespace there.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gearmand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Monty Taylor schrieb: > Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Monty Taylor schrieb: >>> I have fixed that, and have uploaded a new version to mentors. Upstream >>> released a new version today which fixed some of the problems I'd found >>> in packaging the first time. >>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gearmand/gearmand_0.6-1.dsc >> - Why are you using direct depends on libfooX (=) instead of >> shlibs:Depends? > > Because I suck. Fixed. lol :> >> * debian/gearman-server.init: >> - What happens if /var/run is not present/mounted on a ramfs? > > I think this is fixed - lemme know what you think of the changes. They are okay. >> Also: >> I: libgearman-dev: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 6588kB 94% >> >> You might split up the package in an arch any and arch all one. > > I was considering making a libgearman-doc package with all the API docs > in it. If I do that, should I go the whole doc-base route? How did you > get lintian to spit out the arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share error? > Mine isn't doing that... I am calling lintian e.g. with -IE --pedantic *.changes > New version with all but arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share fixed has > been uploaded. Seems okay for me, but I think you should fix the arch-dep-big-usr-share warning, so that the archive won't be bloated :) - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoUTdkACgkQ2XA5inpabMezoQCfS2AvjU2D1SsMz7J3tR+ry1bY X5QAn3ILScHT3g2j352VwKm2gnIbFwiq =ORXm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: vfu (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Vera schrieb:
> El mié, 20-05-2009 a las 12:51 +0200, Patrick Matthäi escribió:
>> Patrick Matthäi schrieb:
>>> William Vera schrieb:
>>>> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>>>> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vfu
>>>> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
>>>> main contrib non-free
>>>> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vfu/vfu_4.09-1.dsc
>>>>
>>>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> you created a unpatch/patch target in debian/rules, which you do not
>>> need if you include the right dpatch file in your rules, which provides
>>> the {un}patch targets.
>> Last but not least I forget:
>> P: vfu source: debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing line 11
>>
>> Delete the doubled whitespace there.
>
> All done, you can see the update at the same URL
> Thanks a lot
>
> Regards!
>
Uploaded.
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkoUIMQACgkQ2XA5inpabMeSugCfSKdS+O5Z9ZKrHGOpA45FvgYd
Ll4AoKCcELA4L48fH2eVmrMhVg5CkB5+
=WIyC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gearmand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Monty Taylor schrieb: > Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> I am calling lintian e.g. with -IE --pedantic *.changes > > Sweet. And now I see it's time to go learn about symbols files. :) In *my* eyes not needed, yet. > >>> New version with all but arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share fixed has >>> been uploaded. >> Seems okay for me, but I think you should fix the arch-dep-big-usr-share >> warning, so that the archive won't be bloated :) >> > > Alright. Fixed and a new version uploaded to mentors. Last issues in debian/control: Package gearman => It shouldn't be arch any So on shlibs:Depends should be removed and there is also a error: Depnds != Depends. Package libgearman-doc is arch all (which is correct), so the shlibs:Depends is wrong. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoUV3QACgkQ2XA5inpabMf3UwCeLvk1NRVzRJd2u3v9Cit04WHX ui8AniUXNhqHakYsLydxj0V6VdEtHf4A =UN6F -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gearmand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monty Taylor schrieb:
> I have fixed that, and have uploaded a new version to mentors. Upstream
> released a new version today which fixed some of the problems I'd found
> in packaging the first time.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gearmand/gearmand_0.6-1.dsc
* debian/control:
- - There are some ${shlibs:Depends} missing
- - Why are you using direct depends on libfooX (=) instead of
shlibs:Depends?
* debian/rules:
- - Do you realy need chrpath? Have you tried out the configure option
- --disable-rpath?
- - If you want to use chrpath, you have to build depend on it
* debian/gearman-server.init:
- - What happens if /var/run is not present/mounted on a ramfs?
* debian/libgearman-dev.lintian-overrides:
- - Are you sure that this file is needed?
lintian:
Please patch the manpage:
I: gearman-client: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
usr/share/man/man1/gearman.1.gz:10
I: gearman-client: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
usr/share/man/man1/gearman.1.gz:16
I: gearman-client: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
usr/share/man/man1/gearman.1.gz:22
.. and get sure that you use a patch system for your changes ;)
Also:
I: libgearman-dev: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 6588kB 94%
You might split up the package in an arch any and arch all one.
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkoUOSIACgkQ2XA5inpabMfcggCfXwR60lufc4M56JeR7hhQL8B0
6A8An0VjfbBUMg0mAEK6JijGffT0/kv6
=S1Ox
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gearmand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Monty Taylor schrieb: > Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >> Last issues in debian/control: >> >> Package gearman => It shouldn't be arch any >> So on shlibs:Depends should be removed and there is also a error: Depnds >> != Depends. > > Fixed. > >> Package libgearman-doc is arch all (which is correct), so the >> shlibs:Depends is wrong. > > Fixed. > > I also had to rename gearman-server, because apparently there is a > package of the old perl server in the archive already named that. The > gearmand is actually the job server and the gearman client is the worker > process, so I did gearman-job-server and gearman-worker for clarity. Are > the conficts/replaces/provides done right? > > New version uploaded to mentors. > > Monty Uploaded. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoUZW8ACgkQ2XA5inpabMf6CACgk2AjFbU/jL5kK1ljVQtKQ96Q LbgAoJ+/9XrG3howtxxVtHZMM/B/fycL =nzw2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: libcue
Taylor LeMasurier-Wren schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcue". * Package name: libcue Version : 1.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Jochen Keil * URL : http://libcue.sourceforge.net/ * License : No specific License specified, but redistribution must contain copyright Wrong, there are also two GPLv2+ files in the tarball, you have to list them. Section : libs It builds these binary packages: libcue-dev - CUE Sheet Parser Library - development files libcue1- CUE Sheet Parser Library The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libcue - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libcue/libcue_1.3.0-1.dsc * debian/changelog: - It is okay if you maintain also the ubuntu version and close ubuntu bugs in your changelog, but your ITP for Debian is definitly missing * debian/control: - There are some useless whitespaces at EOL. * debian/copyright: - You might want add your own copyright for the packaging. The build FTBFS: appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating src/libcue/Makefile config.status: creating src/libcue/libcue.pc config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands configure: WARNING: Unrecognized options: --disable-maintainer-mode /usr/bin/make -C . make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0' cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/config/missing --run aclocal-1.10 -I co nfig /tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/config/missing: line 54: aclocal-1.10: command not foun d WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/config/missing --run automake-1.10 --f oreign /tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/config/missing: line 54: automake-1.10: command not fou nd WARNING: `automake-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/config/missing --run autoconf /tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/config/missing: line 54: autoconf: command not found WARNING: `autoconf' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/config/missing --run autoheader /tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/config/missing: line 54: autoheader: command not found WARNING: `autoheader' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acconfig.h' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. rm -f stamp-h1 touch config.h.in /usr/bin/make all-recursive make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0' Making all in src/libcue make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/src/libcue' /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I . -I../.. -I. -Wall -Wmissing-declarations -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -c -o cd.lo cd .c ../../libtool: line 467: CDPATH: command not found ../../libtool: line 1145: func_opt_split: command not found libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 2.2.6 Debian-2.2.6a-4, but the libtool: definition of this LT_INIT comes from an older release. libtool: You should recreate aclocal.m4 with macros from libtool 2.2.6 Debian-2. 2.6a-4 libtool: and run autoconf again. make[3]: *** [cd.lo] Error 63 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/src/libcue' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 E: Failed autobuilding of package -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gtrayicon
Taylor LeMasurier-Wren schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtrayicon". * Package name: gtrayicon Version : 1.1-1 Upstream Author : Javier Valencia (javiervalenci...@gmail.com) * URL : http://gtrayicon.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Version 3 and later Section : utils It builds these binary packages: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME gtrayicon-dbg - Generic tray icon for GNOME - debug symbols The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtrayicon - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtrayicon/gtrayicon_1.1-1.dsc * debian/changelog: - Missing close of debian ITP. * debian/control: - Useless whitespaces at EOL. * debian/copyright: - Point to the GPL-3 file instead of the GPL symlink. Have you sent your patch and manpage to upstream? lintian: I: gtrayicon source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "priority" in package gtrayicon-dbg I: gtrayicon: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/gtrayicon.1.gz:41 I: gtrayicon: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/gtrayicon.1.gz:42 I: gtrayicon: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gtrayicon
Taylor LeMasurier-Wren schrieb: The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtrayicon - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtrayicon/gtrayicon_1.1-1.dsc I: gtrayicon source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "priority" in package gtrayicon-dbg I: gtrayicon: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/gtrayicon.1.gz:41 I: gtrayicon: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/gtrayicon.1.gz:42 I: gtrayicon: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright Cheers. I've updated the package, submitted an ITP, and notified the developer of my additions. How is it now? Not completed: I: gtrayicon-dbg: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright I: gtrayicon: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/gtrayicon.1.gz:41 I: gtrayicon: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/gtrayicon.1.gz:42 I: gtrayicon: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright Use lintian with -IE --pedantic *.changes and keep the list in CC ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: libcue
Taylor LeMasurier-Wren schrieb: The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libcue - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libcue/libcue_1.3.0-1.dsc * debian/changelog: - It is okay if you maintain also the ubuntu version and close ubuntu bugs in your changelog, but your ITP for Debian is definitly missing * debian/control: - There are some useless whitespaces at EOL. * debian/copyright: - You might want add your own copyright for the packaging. The build FTBFS: (bunch of output) Okay, I've edited control, appended copyright, and added something to rules that might fix the build error. I'm not seeing any build errors on my pbuilder so I can only guess what's going on. How's the package now? Your debian/copyright fix does not make me very happy. I think you should follow the proposal copyright format described here: => http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat It still FTBFS: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/src/libcue' /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I. -Wall -Wmissing-declarations-g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -c -o cd.lo cd.c ../../libtool: line 467: CDPATH: command not found ../../libtool: line 1145: func_opt_split: command not found libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 2.2.6 Debian-2.2.6a-4, but the libtool: definition of this LT_INIT comes from an older release. libtool: You should recreate aclocal.m4 with macros from libtool 2.2.6 Debian-2.2.6a-4 libtool: and run autoconf again. make[3]: *** [cd.lo] Error 63 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0/src/libcue' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libcue-1.3.0' I am building it in an up-to-date Debian Sid pbuilder chroot on amd64, maybe this helps you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gtrayicon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Taylor LeMasurier-Wren schrieb: > I: gtrayicon-dbg: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright >> I: gtrayicon: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/gtrayicon.1.gz:41 >> I: gtrayicon: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/gtrayicon.1.gz:42 >> I: gtrayicon: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright >> >> Use lintian with -IE --pedantic *.changes and keep the list in CC ;) > > Okay, I've cleaned up most of the new lintian stuff, although I couldn't > figure out that damn ChangeLog thing. > Is this acceptable now? Uploaded. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoVSWwACgkQ2XA5inpabMcYEACglxD1biF7I+fY9pTvEGXHbSyA BLsAnj+RNmo3+tt8QTAqJEtyZHA/j1bj =U/2u -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Both dpkg-source -x foo.dsc and lintian seems to ignore trustedkeys.gpg keyring
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 José Manuel Santamaría Lema schrieb: > Hi, before filing bugs and doing it wrong, I need to ask: > > > A few hours ago, after upgrading my system, I got a new warning from > lintian in my packages (I'm not on debian-maintainers.gpg keyring): > > > $ lintian -i -I subtitlecomposer_0.5.2-1.dsc > I: subtitlecomposer source: tar-errors-from-source gpgv: Signature made > Tue May 19 00:51:58 2009 CEST using DSA key ID 5F99C10F > N: > N: tar produced an error while unpacking this source package. This probably > N: means there's something broken or at least strange about the way the > N: upstream tar file was constructed. You may want to report this as an > N: upstream bug. > N: > N: Severity: normal, Certainty: wild-guess > N: > I: subtitlecomposer source: tar-errors-from-source gpgv: Can't check > signature: public key not found Hello, I also noticed this the last days if I built packages with pdebuild instead of pbuilder directly, but I haven't got the time to have a deeper look in it, yet. Is this also the usecase with your error? - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoZeZQACgkQ2XA5inpabMef9wCfdW0hkKJT3TjIAsO2UMTyQkQh sQEAnA5+RmATp/8ATSV6ll9mVF+Duutn =vELm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: kplayer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Palacio schrieb: > On Sábado 16 Mayo 2009 04:40:17 Patrick Matthäi escribió: >> David Palacio schrieb: >>>>> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kplayer >>>> * debian/control: >>>> - The bugs field is useless here >> Now format is useless >> >>>> - Please add the homepage field >> There is a doubled http:// >> >>>> * debian/copyright: >>>> - You may leave your own copyright there >>>> - The files in doc/ are licensed with the GFDL, see COPYING-DOCS >>> They are not being installed. Or do you want them out of sources too? >> If they are in the tarball, they have to be listed in copyright. >> >> Also here is another warning: >> P: kplayer: experimental-to-unstable-without-comment >> >> You may add a ITP or overtake an existing and close it with your firstz >> initial debian upload. >> >> You also want to add a menu file. > Done. > > Thanks. * debian/control: - - You suggest a non-existing package kplayer-doc. * debian/menu: - - The icon file is missing there, it should be a xpm. If no .xpm is available, you may simply generate it with gimp. * debian/patches/* - - Have you sent them to upstream? * debian/copyright: There are still bigger issues for which the package will get a reject. 1) I can not see from your copyright which files/dirs are licensed under the terms of the GPLv3+ and which are licensed unter the GFDL. 2) I don't believe that every copyright holder has his copyleft in *all* files. Write it e.g. this way: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/k/kdenlive/current/copyright Or much better follow the proposal copyright format: http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkocRtIACgkQ2XA5inpabMf38ACggE+LWXJRbzyZANsCG4pmX1u5 Pp8AoKCKGUUi8C373+AQZJNz0eugbzLG =jsof -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: qemulator (2nd try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Francesco Namuri schrieb: >> I've packaged a new version of qemulator that fixes some important >> bugs[1], I asked for a review/upload to my usual sponsor for this >> packages but I haven't got response from Monday, maybe Steffen Joeris >> is on vacation... I can't verify this, so I'm asking to the list if >> someone can do a review/upload of the package... >> >> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: >> - dget >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qemulator/qemulator_0.5-4.dsc patches/python2.5_fixes.patch |19433 ++ This patch seems realy realy bloated to me, also it includes thousands of whitespace tab replacing etc, also a patch header is missing. Please fix this patch first, that it is readable and just contains important changes, after that I will do a review. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkohEYYACgkQ2XA5inpabMeHLQCgjiQCo0OmxSEjTUhqOK2p5RvN uhoAn3JsmvyiIuUqUtPXm8td44mZ/z10 =9vQ6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: congruity
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Trudel schrieb:
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload would fix these bugs: 512599
>
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/congruity
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
> contrib non-free
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/congruity/congruity_9-1.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Hello,
* debian/control:
- - There is no binary code, just binary-indep, so it has to be arch:all.
- - Missing ${misc:Depends}
- - Do you realy thing, that all the build depends are *realy* necessary?
- - You should extend your long-desc a bit.
- - You are missing the homepage field.
* debian/watch:
$ uscan --report-status
Processing watchfile line for package congruity...
Newest version on remote site is 10, local version is 9
* debian/rules:
- - Remove the useless whitespaces at EOL.
- - Remove the useless dh_make comments
- - As I understand the python packaging guide, you should make use of the
python debhelpers, see [1].
* debian/copyright:
- - You are pointing to the GPL-2 file.
[1]: http://debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkojiygACgkQ2XA5inpabMdsiwCgpZ1BdTE5xD2XcvdgEv+ZJru0
/v4AoJ1Fo3iC/K8iyvPDetZ3fUFUFZvV
=FViF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: concordance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Trudel schrieb: > It builds these binary packages: > concordance - Harmony remote configuration tool > libconcord1 - libs for concordance, the Harmony remote configuration tool > libconcord1-dev - development files for concordance library > python-concordance - python bindings for concordance, the Harmony remote > configuration > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 512597 > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/concordance > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/concordance/concordance_0.21-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. * debian/control: - - Why are you adding manualy library depends? * debian/copyright: For the following files you missed to list the license/copyright holders: libconcord/win/usb_rtl.h concordance/ltmain.sh libconcord/ltmain.sh And you are again pointing to the wrong licensefile. * debian/rules: Uhm what's this? cdbs with debhelper style rules? Use cdbs and read the documentation how to modify it or use debhelper without cdbs. * debian/patches/*: - - Missing patch description. * debian/*.dirs: - - Useless files, see dh_install(1) - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkojjnMACgkQ2XA5inpabMeIDQCgqa0lKPnaFOqY+xacSZ+yDti+ GtUAoIqXDKVVLzhK4QFKr3Z/dmqfMfp0 =T0Tz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: concordance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Matthäi schrieb: > Matt Trudel schrieb: >> It builds these binary packages: >> concordance - Harmony remote configuration tool >> libconcord1 - libs for concordance, the Harmony remote configuration tool >> libconcord1-dev - development files for concordance library >> python-concordance - python bindings for concordance, the Harmony remote >> configuration > >> The package appears to be lintian clean. > >> The upload would fix these bugs: 512597 > >> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: >> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/concordance >> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main >> contrib non-free >> - dget >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/concordance/concordance_0.21-1.dsc > >> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > * debian/control: > - Why are you adding manualy library depends? > > * debian/copyright: > For the following files you missed to list the license/copyright holders: > libconcord/win/usb_rtl.h > concordance/ltmain.sh > libconcord/ltmain.sh > And you are again pointing to the wrong licensefile. > > * debian/rules: > Uhm what's this? cdbs with debhelper style rules? Use cdbs and read the > documentation how to modify it or use debhelper without cdbs. > > * debian/patches/*: > - Missing patch description. > > * debian/*.dirs: > - Useless files, see dh_install(1) WHops just forget: I: python-concordance: extended-description-is-probably-too-short I: libconcord1: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libconcord.so.1.0.0 I: libconcord1: extended-description-is-probably-too-short I: libconcord1-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short I: concordance: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/concordance.1.gz:36 I: concordance: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/concordance.1.gz:59 E: concordance: duplicate-conffile /etc/udev/rules.d/z60_concordance.rules - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkojjz4ACgkQ2XA5inpabMfYQACfcyDsPDrN5qDSonpisgebX6QN zU8AmwUCrOAjovU/vuvJhUzlvmUpxUOE =6J1k -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: concordance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please keep debian-ment...@l.d.o in CC.
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schrieb:
> Patrick,
>
>> * debian/control:
>> - - Why are you adding manualy library depends?
>
> Stuff I forgot to remove, since it would get taken care of by
> misc:Depends and shlibs:Depends, afaik.. Am I correct?
shlibs:Depends is for the shared lib. depends.
>
>> * debian/copyright:
>> For the following files you missed to list the license/copyright holders:
>>libconcord/win/usb_rtl.h
>>concordance/ltmain.sh
>>libconcord/ltmain.sh
>> And you are again pointing to the wrong licensefile.
>>
>
> Yikes. I guess it's my fault for building this with a find and not
> double-checking carefully enough.
>
>> * debian/rules:
>> Uhm what's this? cdbs with debhelper style rules? Use cdbs and read the
>> documentation how to modify it or use debhelper without cdbs.
>>
>
> Here's where I'm really stuck: I was following the Ubuntu packaging
> guide to the best of my comprehension, and it seemed like it was more
> or less what was recommended. In any case, I'm trying to make it use
> just cdbs now. Is that the right way to go for someone who's
> relatively new to packaging?
In my opinion cdbs is easier for beginners if the package easily builds
with the three configure, make {install} steps, which is not the case here.
Also with cdbs you may miss the understanding of the dh_* helpers.
>
> Also, the source I have to deal with is a little complicated: there
> are different parts, all under different subdirectories with their own
> configure/Makefile, and no master Makefile to work with. As such, so
> far autotools.mk just won't work. I'm trying to figure out a way to
> make it go to each of the subdirectories and then run configure, make
> and all. Any hints on where to look? A simple cd under
I think a debhelper based solution would be better in your case.
Have e.g. a look in the rules of the package apt-dater, there is a
simmilar situation.
>> * debian/patches/*:
>> - - Missing patch description.
>>
>
> Isn't that just the name of the patch that is a little to general? If
> not, where would that description go? I can't find anything about it
> in the New Maintainer's Guide.
Just wrote it in the header of the patch introduced by a #
>
>> * debian/*.dirs:
>> - - Useless files, see dh_install(1)
>
> Thanks for all the feedback!
>
> / Matt
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkomSMkACgkQ2XA5inpabMePtQCfczlrGGuK5EeqzZDb7QuX+KUZ
rsoAn3UTPpxduxS8F0DF2d1SVWzcVBUE
=3xgR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: subnetcalc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Dreibholz schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "subnetcalc". > > * Package name: subnetcalc > Version : 2.0.0-1 > Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz > * URL : http://www.iem.uni-due.de/~dreibh/subnetcalc/ > * License : GPL, version 3 > Section : net > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/subnetcalc_2.0.0-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Hello, * debian/changelog: - - Missing close of an ITP in Debian. * debian/control: - - Out of date standards version. * debian/copyright: - - You miss your own copyright for your debian/ work. * debian/rules: - - Please wrap l19 so that it is readable on a 80x terminal. - - Disable DH_VERBOSE in offical builds. - - Why are you adding calls to install-indep? Also the binary-indep one.. You do not have a arch:all pkg. And lintian finaly gives me: I: subnetcalc: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man8/subnetcalc.8.gz:52 - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkomTS0ACgkQ2XA5inpabMd1GQCdFidNW8n4V/g10YfpDob4g4LC dScAn3efGFnHFb3i4iou32NbuAJaRaKj =HYZt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: subnetcalc
Thomas Dreibholz schrieb: On Mittwoch 03 Juni 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: * debian/changelog: - Missing close of an ITP in Debian. This won't close the bug. Have a look in the policy how to close bugs. * debian/copyright: - You miss your own copyright for your debian/ work. You don't need to rephrase the whole GPL-3+ license for your work. Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: concordance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schrieb:
> Thanks.
>
> I've applied the suggested changes to the files, and pushed it back on
> mentors.debian.net. It's using the same version number as before, just
> overwrote the files. Not sure if this is the preferred way to do this.
> I'm aware that it's definitely not the case in a "proper" repository
> :)
>
> Mathieu Trudel
> mathieu...@gmail.com
Hello,
please always have the link to the dsc somewhere :)
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/concordance/concordance_0.21-1.dsc
First do a 'grep -c \ $ *' in your debian/ dir and fix it.
Why are you using a versioned build-depend on python-all-dev with a
debian revision in it? Is there any special reason?
libconcord1-dev should have a binary:Version versioned depend on
libconcord1.
Do you have realy tested your package? python-concordance is empty. Also
I do not think that it has to be arch:any and it should (wheter it is
arch:{all,any} a >= source:Version or binary:Version depend on libconcord1.
Line 16, 28, 40 and 55 are too long in control, you would have find it
out with lintian.
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkonoyQACgkQ2XA5inpabMf7pQCbBsLSAfo4CnSfLeh//L4uNe+u
Rt8Anid/WF3TjZvXuVJLdSgqdT5CXvom
=W0sm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: subnetcalc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Dreibholz schrieb: > Dear Patrick, > > thank you for your review of the SubNetCalc package. The updated package at > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/ should fix the two > problems: > - Added "Closes" field with ITP number > - Shortened GPL block in debian/copyright If you bump the debian revision on each upload, then don't delete the old changelog entrys. I am ok with bumping it to -1 again. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkooLMEACgkQ2XA5inpabMc62gCeJWnon5EK+pNpl80splgMmcdB vSUAn3a0asKQIXsuVgrARULq1RdDTB41 =O+u0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: concordance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schrieb: > That said, I did run lintian (it gets run automatically). There were > no errors though. > > I usually run bzr-buildpackage once with no switches, to build the > debs and look at them manually with dpkg --contents and whatnot, and > once with '-S' to be able to upload it and test it properly in > pbuilder. lintian never gave any errors. Is there's a crucial step I'm > missing somewhere in the process? > > This time I ran bzr-buildpackage -S, then pbuilder, and finally tested > the deb files with lintian, only one error comes up: > > mtru...@mtrudel-laptop:/var/cache/pbuilder/sid-i386/result$ lintian > -vIE --pedantic *.deb > N: Setting up lab in /tmp/uxapu7uunO ... > N: Processing 4 packages... > [...] > N: Processing binary package libconcord1 (version 0.21-1) ... > I: libconcord1: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libconcord.so.1.0.0 > [...] That is the error, you are just checking the debs. Just try out -IE --pedantic *.changes, this will inspect everything. I will recheck it later this day. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkopQyQACgkQ2XA5inpabMcECwCcD77kS9KWTNMyr7uHJzU8WsTm kN8AniENRKqf6cSqM3KC5OdcW1kmVQtd =uYvc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: concordance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schrieb: >> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schrieb: > [...] >> Hello, >> >> please always have the link to the dsc somewhere :) >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/concordance/concordance_0.21-1.dsc > > I'll keep that in mind, sorry. It's been re-updated. Hmm okay my last issues: > dpkg-deb: warning: 'debian/python-concordance/DEBIAN/control' contains > user-defined field 'Python-Version' This seems wrong for me, without looking into the policy. python-concordance just contains binary-indep data. Fix your control and rules. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkopRm0ACgkQ2XA5inpabMehQQCfWjJjlr7sIFmkv9mxYo3vyipn huAAni0IZjodHAQ3ewSQ1UsrKNNSeAqj =qAPP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: concordance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schrieb:
> Patrick,
>
> The package has been re-uploaded to mentors.debian.net; please see
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/concordance/concordance_0.21-1.dsc
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> I just re-read the policy, and it looks to me like it's okay;
> following point 2.3, and also looking very much like the pyenchant
> example from the http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy page.
Right.
>
> In any case, I applied the changes you proposed: changed Architecture
> to all for python-concordance, and I added all the tasks under
> binary-indep.
Yes, but too many.
Please explain e.g. *very* short why dh_strip e.g. is useless in
binary-indep.
Also dh_{link,installman} at all and dh_{pycentral,install} are not
needed in rules.
Also you made a new error. Now the package is not binNMU safe. You can
not prop. binary:Depend from an arch:all package to another one. Use
source:Version.
>
> I updated the package again. It's lintian-clean for the
> _source.changes, and the only error in lintian from the binary
> packages is still the lack of a symbols file.
>
> I: libconcord1: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libconcord.so.1.0.0
>
> Is fixing this as simple as adding 'dpkg-gensymbols -plibconcord1'
> somewhere in my 'debian/rules' file? The library packaging guide is a
> little unclear to me, and so is the manpage for dpkg-gensymbols.
Personaly I am also not maining symbols files, because of the bad
handling of FTBFS on arches where they may diff ;)
It is not a need for me currently.
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkopYIAACgkQ2XA5inpabMdluQCdFhFYAysYcrFfLOmVLnJ9lToZ
uYoAmQFj+0DTChioPNAzLl5S9jgj86eG
=QvHt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: PapaFactory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Narinder Claire schrieb: > For consideration for upload to Debian repository. > > Info: > PapaFactory is a header-only C++ library providing three generic > abstract factories. T > he library is licensed under the Boost software license. Aha and what wanted you to say us now with this message? - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkophc4ACgkQ2XA5inpabMfvtACdGxtdA1rCkFjdlhMloGExqDdE 5c8AnA/am/QA2+MIpMQISqJO1oO7njnH =arjI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: subnetcalc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Dreibholz schrieb: > Dear Patrick, > > thank you for your review of the SubNetCalc package. The updated package at > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/ should fix the > changelog problem: > - I have restored the old entries from SVN > - The new upstream version is now 2.0.2, therefore the new Debian package is > 2.0.2-1debian1. > > > Best regards > Thomas Dreibholz Ehm what are you doing? changelog-v2, duplicated changelog entrys, a Closes field in debian/control - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoreQ8ACgkQ2XA5inpabMeFwgCggunae+7VW0H0I1RJ/j9dXR1G UMsAoKA/fe+69qosh7lmVXngb8cBG8nd =wvIX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: kplayer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Palacio schrieb: > On Martes 26 Mayo 2009 14:45:23 Patrick Matthäi escribió: >> David Palacio schrieb: >>> On Sábado 16 Mayo 2009 04:40:17 Patrick Matthäi escribió: >>>> David Palacio schrieb: >>>>>>> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kplayer >>>>>> * debian/control: >>>>>> - The bugs field is useless here >>>> Now format is useless >>>> >>>>>> - Please add the homepage field >>>> There is a doubled http:// >>>> >>>>>> * debian/copyright: >>>>>> - You may leave your own copyright there >>>>>> - The files in doc/ are licensed with the GFDL, see COPYING-DOCS >>>>> They are not being installed. Or do you want them out of sources too? >>>> If they are in the tarball, they have to be listed in copyright. >>>> >>>> Also here is another warning: >>>> P: kplayer: experimental-to-unstable-without-comment >>>> >>>> You may add a ITP or overtake an existing and close it with your firstz >>>> initial debian upload. >>>> >>>> You also want to add a menu file. >>> Done. >>> >>> Thanks. >> * debian/control: >> - You suggest a non-existing package kplayer-doc. >> >> * debian/menu: >> - The icon file is missing there, it should be a xpm. If no .xpm is >> available, you may simply generate it with gimp. >> >> * debian/patches/* >> - Have you sent them to upstream? > Those already are fixed upstream, as noted in the diff comments. > >> * debian/copyright: >> There are still bigger issues for which the package will get a reject. >> 1) I can not see from your copyright which files/dirs are licensed under >> the terms of the GPLv3+ and which are licensed unter the GFDL. >> 2) I don't believe that every copyright holder has his copyleft in *all* >> files. >> >> Write it e.g. this way: >> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/k/kdenlive/current/copyrigh >> t >> >> Or much better follow the proposal copyright format: >> http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat > I did it instead pkg-kde style (I have worked there a little). But it still > addresses your two points. Uploaded. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkorgn4ACgkQ2XA5inpabMdYJQCfXdIR+/5GhoO+cTdCr2/AhR4P nS4AnRuEvUehIl+2R/+Ra5WyIc8L7ycH =AnaU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: subnetcalc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Dreibholz schrieb: > Dear Patrick, > > thank you for your review of the SubNetCalc package. The updated package at > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/ should fix the > problems. I have removed the duplicate entries in changelog as well as the > temporary file changelog-v2. Also, I have removed the Closes field from > debian/control. Could you also fix following: dh_installman dh_installman: You asked that all arch in(dep) packages be built, but there are none of that type. dh_link dh_link: You asked that all arch in(dep) packages be built, but there are none of that type. dh_strip dh_strip: You asked that all arch in(dep) packages be built, but there are none of that type. dh_compress dh_compress: You asked that all arch in(dep) packages be built, but there are none of that type. dh_fixperms dh_fixperms: You asked that all arch in(dep) packages be built, but there are none of that type. dh_makeshlibs dh_makeshlibs: You asked that all arch in(dep) packages be built, but there are none of that type. (.. etc ..) And if you *realy* want to upload it as -2 instead of -1 (don't change again and again you "style"), then also make use of the -v option. Last but not least: * Closes Debian ITP bug with wnpp (Closes: #531710). Better write it as * Initial release. (Closes: #xyz) - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkotRgAACgkQ2XA5inpabMeUxgCfTh6isFYlIW7urTwX17SDX/q5 0a8AoJe71LxFQtbrTmajuJ/cBFpUYJ7A =n58B -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: subnetcalc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Dreibholz schrieb: > Dear Patrick, Thijs, Paul, > > thank you for your review of the SubNetCalc package. The updated package at > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/ should fix the > problem. > > Also, the debian/control description has been updated to better show the > features of subnetcalc. Unlike ipcalc, it supports also IPv6. Unlike sipcalc, > it also identifies address types and presents additional information > extracted > from the addresses. The output is also colourized for better > understandability > of the different address parts. Finally, subnetcalc can generate IPv6 Unique > Local prefixes. Huff This *can not* be a release for Debian.. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoutLkACgkQ2XA5inpabMcXxgCeP7Oe0loYetPbj5KkslvoLWxe k9kAnAn0iwKyrFeAowGf11nmUcRt9Rya =m3O3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: subnetcalc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Dreibholz schrieb: > On Dienstag, 9. Juni 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Thomas Dreibholz schrieb: >>> Dear Patrick, Thijs, Paul, >>> >>> thank you for your review of the SubNetCalc package. The updated package >>> at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/ should fix >>> the problem. >>> >>> Also, the debian/control description has been updated to better show the >>> features of subnetcalc. Unlike ipcalc, it supports also IPv6. Unlike >>> sipcalc, it also identifies address types and presents additional >>> information extracted from the addresses. The output is also colourized >>> for better understandability of the different address parts. Finally, >>> subnetcalc can generate IPv6 Unique Local prefixes. >> Huff >> >> This *can not* be a release for Debian.. > > Sorry, this was the wrong package. Now, really the intended Debian package is > uploaded at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/ . > > > Best regards > Thomas Dreibholz > You again enabled dh_verbosity, please remove it. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkovyykACgkQ2XA5inpabMdhaQCdH3p846f2FyEVedc4wJ/B2v9i XVsAniXyMtSMBMHtkrAtdZnZhtBYJl+7 =/DUN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: subnetcalc
Thomas Dreibholz schrieb: On Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: You again enabled dh_verbosity, please remove it. Dear Patrick, thank you for the review of SubNetCalc. The updated package at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/ should fix the problem. Uploaded. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
