Bug#1043576: RFS: odr-audioenc/3.4.0-1 -- DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR-mmbTools
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-audioenc": * Package name : odr-audioenc Version : 3.4.0-1 Upstream contact : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools * License : FSFAP, GPL-3.0+, Expat, Apache-2.0, GPL-3+ with Autoconf-2.0~Archive exception, GPL-2.0+, LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2+ with Autoconf-data exception, apple-free, Fraunhofer-FDK-AAC-for-Android * Vcs : https://github.com/opendigitalradio/debian-audioenc Section : contrib/hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-audioenc - DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR- mmbTools To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-audioenc/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/o/odr-audioenc/odr-audioenc_3.4.0-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-audioenc (3.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream version 3.4.0 * Do not report specific packages in the Depends section Regards, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1043538: RFS: odr-dabmux/4.4.1-1 -- Digital Audio Broadcasting multiplexer compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-dabmux": * Package name : odr-dabmux Version : 4.4.1-1 Upstream contact : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/Mmbtools * License : FSFAP, GPL-3.0+, BSL-1.0, Expat, Apache-2.0, GPL-2.0+, LGPL-2.1, GPL-3.0+ with autoconf exception * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-dabmux Section : hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-dabmux - Digital Audio Broadcasting multiplexer compliant to ETSI EN 300 401 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmux/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odr-dabmux/odr-dabmux_4.4.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: odr-dabmux (4.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream version 4.4.1 Regards, -- Robin Alexander
Bug#1043370: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-2 -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-dabmod" (dab/dab+ modulator) which belongs to the Opendigitalradio DAB/DAB+ broadcasting chain: * Package name : odr-dabmod Version : 2.6.0-2 Upstream contact : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools * License : FSFAP, LGPL-3, GPL-3.0+, Expat, Apache-2.0, BSD- 3-Clause, GPL-2.0+, GPL-3.0+ with autoconf exception, GPL-2+ with Autoconf-data exception, EXPAT * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-dabmod Section : hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-dabmod - DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmod/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odr-dabmod/odr-dabmod_2.6.0-2.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-dabmod (2.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Do not report specific packages in the Depends section Thank you very much in advance for your support, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1041531: RFS: odr-audioenc/3.3.1-1 [ITP] -- DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR-mmbTools
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package odr-audioenc that is part of the DAB/DAB+ broadcasting chain. * Package name : odr-audioenc Version : 3.3.1-1 Upstream contact : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools * License : Apache-2.0, Fraunhofer-FDK-AAC-for-Android, Expat, GPL-2+ with Autoconf-data exception, GPL-3+ with Autoconf- 2.0~Archive exception, GPL-3.0+, FSFAP, apple-free, LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2.0+ * Vcs : https://github.com/opendigitalradio/debian-audioenc Section : contrib/hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-audioenc - DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR- mmbTools To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-audioenc/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/o/odr-audioenc/odr-audioenc_3.3.1-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-audioenc (3.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release. Closes: #1008124 Regards, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1041532: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package odr-dabmod that is part of the Opendigitalradio DAB/DAB+ broadcasting chain. * Package name : odr-dabmod Version : 2.6.0-1 Upstream contact : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools * License : GPL-3.0+ with autoconf exception, LGPL-3, Apache- 2.0, EXPAT, BSD-3-Clause, Expat, GPL-3.0+, FSFAP, GPL-2+ with Autoconf- data exception, GPL-2.0+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-dabmod Section : hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-dabmod - DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmod/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odr-dabmod/odr-dabmod_2.6.0-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-dabmod (2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. Closes: #1007104 Regards, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1040422: RFS: odr-audioenc/3.3.1-1 [ITP] -- DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR-mmbTools
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-audioenc".This is 1 of the 4 components of the Opendigitalradio DAB broadcasting chain: * Package name : odr-audioenc Version : 3.3.1-1 Upstream contact : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools * License : Apache-2.0, Fraunhofer-FDK-AAC-for-Android, Expat, GPL-2+ with Autoconf-data exception, GPL-3+ with Autoconf- 2.0~Archive exception, GPL-3.0+, FSFAP, apple-free, LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2.0+ * Vcs : https://github.com/opendigitalradio/debian-audioenc Section : contrib/hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-audioenc - DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR- mmbTools To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-audioenc/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/o/odr-audioenc/odr-audioenc_3.3.1-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-audioenc (3.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release. Closes: #1008124 Regards, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1040421: RFS: odr-dabmux/4.4.0-1 -- Digital Audio Broadcasting multiplexer compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-dabmux".This is 1 of the 4 components of the Opendigitalradio DAB broadcasting chain: * Package name : odr-dabmux Version : 4.4.0-1 Upstream contact : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/Mmbtools * License : LGPL-2.1, GPL-3.0+ with autoconf exception, Apache-2.0, Expat, BSL-1.0, GPL-3.0+, FSFAP, GPL-2.0+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-dabmux Section : hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-dabmux - Digital Audio Broadcasting multiplexer compliant to ETSI EN 300 401 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmux/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odr-dabmux/odr-dabmux_4.4.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: odr-dabmux (4.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . [ Robin Alexander ] * New upstream version 4.4.0 Regards, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1040420: RFS: odr-padenc/3.0.0-2 -- This is an encoder for Programme Associated Data
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-padenc".This is 1 of the 4 components of the Opendigitalradio DAB broadcasting chain: * Package name : odr-padenc Version : 3.0.0-2 Upstream contact : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/Mmbtools * License : GPL-3.0+ with autoconf exception, BSL-1.0, GPL- 3.0+, FSFAP, GPL-2+ with Autoconf-data exception * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-padenc Section : hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-padenc - This is an encoder for Programme Associated Data To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-padenc/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odr-padenc/odr-padenc_3.0.0-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: odr-padenc (3.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix lintian issues Regards, smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Bug#1040419: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-dabmod".This is 1 of the 4 components of the Opendigitalradio DAB broadcasting chain: * Package name : odr-dabmod Version : 2.6.0-1 Upstream contact : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools * License : GPL-3.0+ with autoconf exception, LGPL-3, Apache- 2.0, EXPAT, BSD-3-Clause, Expat, GPL-3.0+, FSFAP, GPL-2+ with Autoconf- data exception, GPL-2.0+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-dabmod Section : hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-dabmod - DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmod/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odr-dabmod/odr-dabmod_2.6.0-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-dabmod (2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. Closes: #1007104 Regards, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Maintaining a package across several debian codenames
Hi Andrey, It’s odd, for the document in https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#special-version-conventions indicates ~bpoNuX unless I missed something… Kind regards. —- Robin > Le 10 avr. 2023 à 20:44, Andrey Rakhmatullin a écrit : > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 08:14:39PM +0200, Robin ALEXANDER wrote: >> In a nutshell, if I understood correctly the debian policy >> >> Branch debian/latest >> File debian/changelog will show "...(3.0.0-1) unstable ..." >> >> Branch debian/bullseye-backports >> File debian/changelog will show "... (3.0.0-1~bpo11u1) bullseye ..." > It's "3.0.0-1~bpo11+1", see https://backports.debian.org/Contribute/ > >> Should I decide to setup a private repository on top to speed up things >> , I could add a new branch to my git repository: >> Branch debian/bullseye >> File debian/changelog would show "... (3.0.0-1~deb11u1) ..." > The versioning scheme for private repos is up to you, as long as it > doesn't clash with schemes used by Debian repos. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Maintaining a package across several debian codenames
Thank you Andrey and Robin. > The debian version tag "debian/3.0.0-1" matches the package's version > number. > > You can find the conventions for backport version numbers documented > in section 5.6.12.2 of the policy. [1] > > If your backport version is "3.0.0-1~bpo11+1" then the tag should be > "debian/3.0.0-1_bpo11+1" (as ~ is disallowed in git tags). > > As mentioned, `gbp tag` will do it for you though. > > [1] > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#special-version-conventions In a nutshell, if I understood correctly the debian policy Branch debian/latest File debian/changelog will show "...(3.0.0-1) unstable ..." Branch debian/bullseye-backports File debian/changelog will show "... (3.0.0-1~bpo11u1) bullseye ..." Should I decide to setup a private repository on top to speed up things , I could add a new branch to my git repository: Branch debian/bullseye File debian/changelog would show "... (3.0.0-1~deb11u1) ..." Robin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Maintaining a package across several debian codenames
Hi, Let's assume I wish to maintain package_A across unstable and bullseye- backports. I understand from https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep14/ that: 1. I need to create 3 branches in my git repository: - upstream/latest - debian/latest - debian/bullseye-backports 2. Since I am using git-buildpackage, I presume I would generate 3 tags when creating a new package version (ex: v3.0.0) - upstream/3.0.0 (when running gbp import-orig) - debian/3.0.0-1 (when running gbp buildpackage inside branch debian/latest) - ??? (when running gbp buildpackage inside branch debian/bullseye- backports) If the above is correct, what should be the name of the last tag (the one issued by gbp buildpackage inside branch debian/bullseye-backports ? Thank you for your help. Robin Alexander signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Creating packages for several distributions
Hi Mechtilde, > > Where do you have the sources? > I just uploaded the sources on salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-audioenc I believe that the git repository is now setup (branches and tags) the way it is supposed to be as per our previous conversation. Please, note that I did not push the package to mentors.debian.net yet. I will probably do it later, once bookworm is released. Kind regards. Robin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Creating packages for several distributions
debian/bullseye would be the name of the branch in my git repository and it would target the bullseye-backports distribution Le mercredi 22 mars 2023 à 16:11 +0100, Andrey Rakhmatullin a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 02:42:28PM +0100, Robin Alexander wrote: > > > > * debian/bullseye: debian official repository and bullseye > Not sure what is this? Do you mean bullseye-backports? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Creating packages for several distributions
Hi Mechtilde and Andrey, Got it for the official debian repository. In a nutshell: - Push to mentors once the freeze is released (ie, after bookworm is released) - Once package in unstable/testing, push a backport to stable and oldstable Got it as well for the number of versions: - Keep 1 branch per repository/distribution: * debian/latest: debian official repository and unstable * debian/bullseye: debian official repository and bullseye * odr/latest: odr repository and unstable * odr/bullseye: odr repository and bullseye Thanks. Robin ALEXANDER
Creating packages for several distributions
Hi, I am in charge of creating debian packages for the Opendigitalradio mmbtools (https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools) and as such, I: - am proposing/pushing debian packages to unstable - manage the Opendigitalradio debian repository (http://debian.opendigitalradio.org) If I want to create a package (ex: odr-audioenc) for both unstable and bullseye on both debian and odr repository, can I have 1 debian/changelog file only where the first line would read: odr-audioenc (3.3.1-1+deb11u1) unstable bullseye; urgency=medium or do I need 2 versions of debian/changelog (thus 2 branches: debian/bullseye + debian/latest): one for each distribution (unstable and bullseye)? Thank you for your help. --- Robin ALEXANDER
Bug#1022168: Review
Hi Kyle, Thank you very much for reviewing my package. I made all the changes you reported and I hope the package can be passed to the next stage. Please let me know if I need to remove the "moreinfo" tag of you are in charge of doing it, as part of the review process. Cheers. Robin On 03.12.22 19:46, Kyle Robbertze wrote: Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Robin, Here is my review of this package: * Remove debian/patches directory - you do not have any patches to apply * debian/changelog: Remove all changelog entries and just have 1 with Initial packaging, closing the ITP bug. This is the first time this package has been uploaded to Debian, so there are no changes to report. * debian/control: Standards version can drop the .1 at the end - just need to track up to the patch version. Also update to 4.6.1 * debian/rules: DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND has a double space after it * debian/copyright: - m4/ax_check_compile_flag.m4 - this licence text is not listed in d/copyright. The file is listed, but the licence text in the file does not match the licence text in d/copyright - The comment should be removed (xml and html files) There is currently a false-positive lintian error that should be added to debian/source/lintian-overrides: E: odr-audioenc source: source-is-missing [libtoolame-dab/html/psycho.html] │ Cheers Kyle -- Robin ALEXANDER OpenPGP_0xB44D368855690D0F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#1008882: RFS: odr-audioenc/3.2.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR-mmbTools
Hi Paul, I need to talk with the person in charge of the upstream odr-audioenc to see whether he could push his changes to the original project. In the meantime, I pushed odr-audioenc to mentors (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-audioenc/) and I have 2 questions regarding the ouptut of lintian: 1. Why didn't the "source-is-missing" error show on my environment (prior to push the package with dput)? Is there a specific lintian setup that I missed? FYI, my packaging environment runs on bullseye (I tried sid yesterday, but somehow there was a problem with one missing package that was preventing apt upgrade and install) 2. The "source-is-missing" error is actually not a missing file but a file (libtoolame-dab/html/psycho.html) with too-long lines. Is there any action I must take to make lintian happy or can the package be accepted "as-is" ? Have a nice week-end On 21.10.22 05:05, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 14:42 +0200, Robin Alexander wrote: I should have written instead that the upstream odr-audioenc *INCLUDES MODIFIED SOURCES* of fdk-aac (Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android). Since the original version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android (I believe it is libfdk-aac-dev) is non-free, I guess that the modified sources also belong to non-free and thus odr-audioenc becomes non-free as well. I note that there is a request to move fdk-aac to main: https://bugs.debian.org/981285 PS: please try to get your fdk-aac changes upstream if you didn't yet. -- Robin ALEXANDER OpenPGP_0xB44D368855690D0F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1022168: RFS: odr-audioenc/3.3.1-1 -- DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR-mmbTools
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-audioenc": * Package name : odr-audioenc Version : 3.3.1-1 Upstream contact : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools * License : Expat, GPL-2+ with Autoconf-data exception, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0+, GPL-2.0+, GPL-3+ with Autoconf-2.0~Archive exception, LGPL-2.1+, ODR-Modified-Version-Of-Fraunhofer-FDK-AAC-for-Android, apple-free * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-audioenc Section : non-free/hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-audioenc - DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR-mmbTools To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-audioenc/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/o/odr-audioenc/odr-audioenc_3.3.1-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-audioenc (3.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 3.3.1 Regards, -- Robin ALEXANDER OpenPGP_0xB44D368855690D0F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#1008882: RFS: odr-audioenc/3.2.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR-mmbTools
Thank you very much Paul. I will apply all your esuggestions with one exception though: the section will be non-free/hamradio in the end, for I made a mistake when I wrote the initial email (my apologies). I should have written instead that the upstream odr-audioenc *INCLUDES MODIFIED SOURCES* of fdk-aac (Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android). Since the original version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android (I believe it is libfdk-aac-dev) is non-free, I guess that the modified sources also belong to non-free and thus odr-audioenc becomes non-free as well. On 20.10.22 10:09, Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, 2022-10-19 at 10:26 +0200, Robin Alexander wrote: My package odr-audioenc was rejected after it reached the NEW queue because one of the library it depends on does not belong to "main" but to "non-free". I therefore need to change the section in file debian/control from "hamradio" to "non-free/hamradio" and submit the package again. If the package itself is otherwise free, you want contrib not non-free. The library will go to non-free of course though. - Do I need to change the package release from 1 to 2 because of this debian/control file change or can I keep the same package release, given that the package never made it to unstable I'm not sure, but I think it would be best to change it, as documentation of the changes done based on ftp-master feedback. - Can I take the opportunity of this change to include the latest upstream version? Yes. can I delete the repository on salsa and re-create it again before pushing the package? Yes, the git repo isn't very relevant here. -- Robin ALEXANDER
Bug#1008882: RFS: odr-audioenc/3.2.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR-mmbTools
Hi, My package odr-audioenc was rejected after it reached the NEW queue because one of the library it depends on does not belong to "main" but to "non-free". I therefore need to change the section in file debian/control from "hamradio" to "non-free/hamradio" and submit the package again. Questions: - Do I need to change the package release from 1 to 2 because of this debian/control file change or can I keep the same package release, given that the package never made it to unstable - Can I take the opportunity of this change to include the latest upstream version? - When I initially created the repository in salsa.debian.org, I was not very familiar with git-buildpackage and I believe that branches and tags are not compliant (you can compare https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-audioenc with https://github.com/opendigitalradio/debian-audioenc). If the version on github is indeed compliant with the debian standards, can I delete the repository on salsa and re-create it again before pushing the package? Thank you very much in advance for your support. -- Robin ALEXANDER OpenPGP_0xB44D368855690D0F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1009867: RFS: odr-dabmux/4.2.1-1 [ITP] -- Digital Audio Broadcasting multiplexer compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Hi Adam, Thank you very much for having considered the odr-dabmux package. I spotted the error (wrong build dependency) and pushed the corrected version to mentors. Since the package was never published I didn't change the version. Could you please give it a new try? If it works, I guess you will be the one pushing the package to the NEW queue; is that right? If you have some time left, could you please also consider package odr- dabmod? This is the last main package of the Opendigitalradio mmbtools. The other 2 (odr-padenc and odr-audioenc were already pushed to the NEW queue) Kind regards. -- Robin Le lundi 18 juillet 2022 à 00:02 +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 05:05:41PM +0200, Robin ALEXANDER wrote: > > * Package name : odr-dabmux > > * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/Mmbtools > > * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-dabmux > > > odr-dabmux - Digital Audio Broadcasting multiplexer compliant to > > ETSI > > EN 300 401 > > > odr-dabmux (4.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > . > > * Initial release. Closes: #1009225 > > Hi! > The build fails for me with: > > checking for zmq.h... no > configure: WARNING: no valid ZMQ installation was found > configure: error: ZeroMQ 4.0.0 is required > > > Meow? Meow! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1008882: RFS: odr-audioenc/3.2.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR-mmbTools
Hi Bastian, I added file debian/watch, rebuilt + uploaded the package and removed the moreinfo tag on bug 1008882. Thank you. -- Robin ALEXANDER Le mercredi 18 mai 2022 à 12:02 +0200, Bastian Germann a écrit : > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Please add a watch file that scans > https://github.com/Opendigitalradio/ODR-AudioEnc/tags. > When you have done that please untag moreinfo. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Hi Bastian, I just realized that I need to make a slight change to file debian/rules by calling dh_auto_configure with an additional argument in order to avoid compiling odr-dabmod with the option "-march=native". Since the odr-dabmod package was not moved to the NEW queue yet, can I just reload the package with the updated debian/rules file or do I also need to modify file debian/changelog indicating the change on debian/rules? In the latter case, do I need to change the package version (ie. moving to 2.6.0-2 from 2.6.0-1)? Have a nice week. -- Robin Le vendredi 29 avril 2022 à 11:14 +0200, Bastian Germann a écrit : > Am 29.04.22 um 11:07 schrieb Robin ALEXANDER: > > As I wrote to you, I: > > 1. Uploaded on Wednesday (April 27) the corrected versions of > > odr- > > dabmux (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmux/) and odr- > > dabmod > > (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmod/) > > > > 2. Removed the moreinfo tag on odr-dabmux > > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009867) and > > odr- > > dabmod (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010004) > > > > Assuming I did everything correctly, is there anything else I must > > do > > to have these 2 packages pushed to the NEW queue (like what was > > done > > with odr-padenc)? Or is it the sponsor/you who pushes the packages > > to > > the NEW queue by closing the above 2 bugs (1009867 and 1010004) ? > > You just have to wait until someone will review the packages. > My comments were just to help getting the packages to a state where a > DD would have a look at it. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Hi Bastian, Thank you for your answer: it is crystal clear! As I wrote to you, I: 1. Uploaded on Wednesday (April 27) the corrected versions of odr- dabmux (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmux/) and odr-dabmod (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmod/) 2. Removed the moreinfo tag on odr-dabmux (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009867) and odr- dabmod (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010004) Assuming I did everything correctly, is there anything else I must do to have these 2 packages pushed to the NEW queue (like what was done with odr-padenc)? Or is it the sponsor/you who pushes the packages to the NEW queue by closing the above 2 bugs (1009867 and 1010004) ? Kind regards. -- Robin ALEXANDER Le mercredi 27 avril 2022 à 14:41 +0200, Bastian Germann a écrit : > Am 27.04.22 um 14:13 schrieb Robin ALEXANDER: > > I now have 1 question. When I built these packages, debuild > > generated > > the xxx_amd64.changes files. Why do I have "amd64" in the filename > > (I > > understand it relates to the X86_64 architecture)? > > For your information, the source is mainly C++ based and it > > compiles > > properly under arm64 and arm/v7 as well. Should I have ran debuild > > in a > > different manner or is it going to be taken care of by the debian > > packaging process later on? > > You caompiled the package on a x86_64 PC, so that behaviour and your > use of debuild is okay. > When you set "Architecture: any" on a binary package, the buildd > network will try to compile the package on every > Debian-supported architecture and kernel, which includes armel, > armhf, and arm64. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Hi Bastian, thank you very much. I followed your instructions and uploaded again both odr-dabmod (Bug#1010004) and odr-dabmux (Bug#1009867). I also removed the tag "moreinfo" on both bugs (hoping I did it right). I now have 1 question. When I built these packages, debuild generated the xxx_amd64.changes files. Why do I have "amd64" in the filename (I understand it relates to the X86_64 architecture)? For your information, the source is mainly C++ based and it compiles properly under arm64 and arm/v7 as well. Should I have ran debuild in a different manner or is it going to be taken care of by the debian packaging process later on? Kind regards. -- Robin ALEXANDER Le mercredi 27 avril 2022 à 00:58 +0200, Bastian Germann a écrit : > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:20:06 +0200 Robin ALEXANDER > wrote: > > Changes for the initial release: > > > > odr-dabmod (2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > > . > > * Initial release. Closes: #1007104 > > Please fix the lintian error (JS minified, source missing) by having > the unminified source in debian/missing-sources. > When you have uploaded a new revision (not changing the changelog), > untag moreinfo. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-dabmod": * Package name : odr-dabmod Version : 2.6.0-1 Upstream Author : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools * License : FSFAP, GPL-2+ with Autoconf-data exception, GPL- 3.0+ with autoconf exception, GPL-3.0+, Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause, EXPAT, LGPL-3, GPL-2.0+, Expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-dabmod Section : hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-dabmod - DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmod/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odr-dabmod/odr-dabmod_2.6.0-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-dabmod (2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. Closes: #1007104 Regards, -- Robin ALEXANDER signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1009867: RFS: odr-dabmux/4.2.1-1 [ITP] -- Digital Audio Broadcasting multiplexer compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-dabmux": * Package name : odr-dabmux Version : 4.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/Mmbtools * License : FSFAP, GPL-3.0+ with autoconf exception, BSL-1.0, GPL-3.0+, Apache-2.0, LGPL-2.1, GPL-2.0+, Expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-dabmux Section : hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-dabmux - Digital Audio Broadcasting multiplexer compliant to ETSI EN 300 401 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmux/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odr-dabmux/odr-dabmux_4.2.1-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-dabmux (4.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. Closes: #1009225 Regards, -- Robin ALEXANDER signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1009105: RFS: odr-padenc/3.0.0-1 [ITP] -- This is an encoder for Programme Associated Data
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-padenc": * Package name : odr-padenc Version : 3.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/Mmbtools * License : FSFAP, GPL-2+ with Autoconf-data exception, GPL- 3.0+ with autoconf exception, BSL-1.0, GPL-3.0+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-padenc Section : hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-padenc - This is an encoder for Programme Associated Data To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-padenc/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odr-padenc/odr- padenc_3.0.0-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-padenc (3.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . [ Robin Alexander ] * Initial release. Closes: #1009060 Regards, -- Robin ALEXANDER
Bug#1008882: RFS: odr-audioenc/3.2.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR-mmbTools
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-audioenc": * Package name: odr-audioenc Version : 3.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools * License : GPL-2+ with Autoconf-data exception, LGPL-2.1+, Fraunhofer-FDK-AAC-for-Android, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0+, GPL-3+ with Autoconf-2.0~Archive exception, apple-free, GPL-2.0+, Expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/ralex/odr-audioenc Section : hamradio The source builds the following binary packages: odr-audioenc - DAB and DAB+ encoder that integrates into the ODR- mmbTools To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-audioenc/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odr-audioenc/odr-audioenc_3.2.0-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: odr-audioenc (3.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release. Closes: #1008124 Regards, -- Robin ALEXANDER
