Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
I strongly recommend that you follow the 0.99+1.0beta4-1 scheme that was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and proven. In summary, the format is [last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please use it, starting with your existing packages, before they go into the official archive. Now is the time to get things right. sure, I agree it is way better, *but* there is users that already have packages with versions in the current scheme, and it (sorry) sucks that they have to downgrade to be up to date. that's why I swear that after the 1.0 final I'll use this scheme, but for the current betas I have to respect the previous error (since it's indeed tasteless, but totally policy-compatible) But I have a doubt suddently, since the (close: #ITP_nb) is not in the changelog of the _last_ revision ... Do I need it to be in the last revision to be taken into account ? -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:32:37PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: But I have a doubt suddently, since the (close: #ITP_nb) is not in the changelog of the _last_ revision ... Do I need it to be in the last revision to be taken into account ? dpkg-buildpackage -v is your friend. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: I strongly recommend that you follow the 0.99+1.0beta4-1 scheme that was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and proven. In summary, the format is [last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please use it, starting with your existing packages, before they go into the official archive. Now is the time to get things right. sure, I agree it is way better, *but* there is users that already have packages with versions in the current scheme, and it (sorry) sucks that they have to downgrade to be up to date. that's why I swear that after the 1.0 final I'll use this scheme, but for the current betas I have to respect the previous error (since it's indeed tasteless, but totally policy-compatible) There were two points I was trying to make. One is that the format 1.4+1.5beta3-1 is superior to your proposed short version 1.4-1+beta3, which looks like trouble. The other is that it would be best to switch to this format before entering the archive. I just want to make sure you haven't overlooked the former. -John -- http://giftfile.org/ :: giftfile project
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
There were two points I was trying to make. One is that the format 1.4+1.5beta3-1 is superior to your proposed short version 1.4-1+beta3, which looks like trouble. well good point again, I should have been not very carefully, in fact, I was proposing something like 1.4+beta3-1 (misplaced the revision sorry) wich is shorter, but in fact, after some (very intense ;p) thought time, in fact, the convention you propose is much better. maybe it should be an advice given in the policyt ? The other is that it would be best to switch to this format before entering the archive. I just want to make sure you haven't overlooked the former. For this part, I repeat that I worked with preversion of my package that had the (not smart) version scheme : 1.0-beta(x)-(rev) and what I find bad is that people that were using it, will have to force dpkg to do the upgrade since 0.99+1.0beta4-1 1.0-beta4-1 and I find it's sad ... I would agree immediately if my scheme wasn't policy compliant, but since it's not the fact, is that really something that should change ? Well if everybody think the actual thing is _that_ bad, well, I don't want argue for something stupid like that, but well, maybe it would be great not to make the users life harder for nothing ? -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
I strongly recommend that you follow the 0.99+1.0beta4-1 scheme that was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and proven. In summary, the format is [last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please use it, starting with your existing packages, before they go into the official archive. Now is the time to get things right. sure, I agree it is way better, *but* there is users that already have packages with versions in the current scheme, and it (sorry) sucks that they have to downgrade to be up to date. that's why I swear that after the 1.0 final I'll use this scheme, but for the current betas I have to respect the previous error (since it's indeed tasteless, but totally policy-compatible) But I have a doubt suddently, since the (close: #ITP_nb) is not in the changelog of the _last_ revision ... Do I need it to be in the last revision to be taken into account ? -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:32:37PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: But I have a doubt suddently, since the (close: #ITP_nb) is not in the changelog of the _last_ revision ... Do I need it to be in the last revision to be taken into account ? dpkg-buildpackage -v is your friend. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
do you have any other advice/remark ? well, if nobody has anything to add, is there someone interested in beeing my sponsor for akregator ? -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: Indeed, in fact, where there will be a 1.1betax i'll use the 1.99-1+betax version number, that is really clear, and shorter than a 0.99-1+1.0-beta4 but in fact, the non-official debian repository where i dput my packages atm had a qdirty package named 1.0-beta1 and I had to produce version numbers greater than this one (the historical thing) starting with 1.0, my version numbering will follow a +betax scheme I strongly recommend that you follow the 0.99+1.0beta4-1 scheme that was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and proven. In summary, the format is [last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please use it, starting with your existing packages, before they go into the official archive. Now is the time to get things right. -John -- http://giftfile.org/ :: giftfile project
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
do you have any other advice/remark ? well, if nobody has anything to add, is there someone interested in beeing my sponsor for akregator ? -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: Indeed, in fact, where there will be a 1.1betax i'll use the 1.99-1+betax version number, that is really clear, and shorter than a 0.99-1+1.0-beta4 but in fact, the non-official debian repository where i dput my packages atm had a qdirty package named 1.0-beta1 and I had to produce version numbers greater than this one (the historical thing) starting with 1.0, my version numbering will follow a +betax scheme I strongly recommend that you follow the 0.99+1.0beta4-1 scheme that was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and proven. In summary, the format is [last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please use it, starting with your existing packages, before they go into the official archive. Now is the time to get things right. -John -- http://giftfile.org/ :: giftfile project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the package proper: - the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net mirrors yet. From the CVS logs you seem to be part of the development team, so it might be simpler to have the upstream tarballs drop debian/* and just include these files in your diff.gz (which doesn't prevent you from keeping debian/* in the same CVS repository!). - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when the final 1.0 version comes out: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.0-beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ You might consider labeling the beta versions something like 0.99+1.0beta4-1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.99+1.0beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Will try to have a look at the packaging itself later today. Cheers, Jeremy -- http://www.jerryweb.org/ : JerryWeb.org http://sailcut.sourceforge.net/ : Sailcut CAD http://mpf70.sourceforge.net/: MPman MP-F70 support for Linux
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
- the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net mirrors yet. they do. From the CVS logs you seem to be part of the development team, so it might be simpler to have the upstream tarballs drop debian/* and just include these files in your diff.gz (which doesn't prevent you from keeping debian/* in the same CVS repository!). Yes, this is a problem, Pierre, please generate a proper .orig.gz tarball, without debian/ dir at all. no problem, I'm the release tech anyway. I'm on it. - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when the final 1.0 version comes out: Two dashes are perfectly valid according to Policy. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.0-beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. You might consider labeling the beta versions something like 0.99+1.0beta4-1. for historical reason I have to keep the dash atm. Will be dropped in favour of your suggestion above for next betas (i mean for other than 1.0 betas) and like said Peter, next version will be 1.0.0-1 and then no problem at all. Cheers, -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote: Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the package proper: - the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net mirrors yet. From the CVS logs you seem to be part of the development team, so it might be simpler to have the upstream tarballs drop debian/* and just include these files in your diff.gz (which doesn't prevent you from keeping debian/* in the same CVS repository!). Yes, this is a problem, Pierre, please generate a proper .orig.gz tarball, without debian/ dir at all. - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when the final 1.0 version comes out: Two dashes are perfectly valid according to Policy. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.0-beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. You might consider labeling the beta versions something like 0.99+1.0beta4-1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.99+1.0beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Will try to have a look at the packaging itself later today. Cheers, Jeremy Yours, Peter
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
no problem, I'm the release tech anyway. I'm on it. done. revision 2 is on its way on kalyxo, and as ever it's on http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/ and as ever lintian, linda and pdebuild clean. any remark ? -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:50 AM, Peter Rockai (mornfall) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote: [...] - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when the final 1.0 version comes out: Two dashes are perfectly valid according to Policy. Indeed; however, as Jeremy pointed out `1.0-beta4' is greater than `1.0' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.0-beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. You might consider labeling the beta versions something like 0.99+1.0beta4-1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.99+1.0beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true true This, otoh, is a commonly used and well-known method of numbering versions so that the final release version is greater than the betas. Adam
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number? Christoph
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Christoph Wegscheider wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number? Indeed, in fact, where there will be a 1.1betax i'll use the 1.99-1+betax version number, that is really clear, and shorter than a 0.99-1+1.0-beta4 but in fact, the non-official debian repository where i dput my packages atm had a qdirty package named 1.0-beta1 and I had to produce version numbers greater than this one (the historical thing) starting with 1.0, my version numbering will follow a +betax scheme but for the 1.0 betas (and maybe pre versions) I'll have to follow the old scheme for backward compatibility -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:16 AM, Christoph Wegscheider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number? You're correct, of course. It's one of those mornings Adam
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:20:23AM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: Hello! I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ (and I would like to start my NM application too). The will be available soon at : deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main You didn't put the following lines in debian/copyright (see [0] and [1]): Copyright (c) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Frerich Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (c) 2001, 2002, 2003 Frerich Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (c) 2003 Frerich Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (C) 2003 Georg Robbers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (C) 2004 by Sashmit Bhaduri Copyright (C) 2004 by Sashmit Bhaduri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Copyright (C) 2004 by Stanislav Karchebny Copyright (C) 2004 by Stanislav Karchebny, Sashmit Bhaduri Copyright (C) 2004 by Teemu Rytilahti Copyright (c) 2004 Frerich Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (C) 2004 Gary Cramblitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Some of the obove lines may be combined into one line. That was just a simplified output of: grep -ri copyright akregator-1.0_beta4fixed/akregator/src/ Please consider to put the URL of the home page of the package in the description in debian/control. See [2] and [3]. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg7.html [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200312/msg00194.html [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-upstream-info [3] http://people.debian.org/~walters/descriptions.html and is already at http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/ here you have the official releases : http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/vanilla/ (official site has not been updated, you can find them on [1] too) Here's the whereabouts of the package: o ITP Bug : 251871 (reported by Peter Rockai, but owned by me with his agreement. he is btw in Cc:) o the package is lintian and linda clean o he builds in pbuilder I also run pbuilder on your source package and lintian and linda on the .dsc created by pbuilder. Version: 1.0-beta4 Upstream Author: Stanislav Karchebny Url: http://akregator.upnet.ru/ Description: RSS feed aggregator for KDE aKregator is a KDE RSS aggregator. It supports the best known metaphors from existing aggregators. It also facilitates good integration with KDE by maintaining an interface similar to Konqueror and KMail. best regards. [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/akregator/ -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ Regards, Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux | Building 28C : :' : Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia `. `' http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/ `- | pgpr7iASumg2Q.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
You didn't put the following lines in debian/copyright (see [0] and [1]): [...] grep -ri copyright akregator-1.0_beta4fixed/akregator/src/ very good point. done Please consider to put the URL of the home page of the package in the description in debian/control. See [2] and [3]. done too it's still lintian and linda clean (didn't test pdebuild, but no modification to build process or to upstream has been done ...) dput-ed to kalyxo again, and as allways at [1] http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/ do you have any other advice/remark ? -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the package proper: - the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net mirrors yet. From the CVS logs you seem to be part of the development team, so it might be simpler to have the upstream tarballs drop debian/* and just include these files in your diff.gz (which doesn't prevent you from keeping debian/* in the same CVS repository!). - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when the final 1.0 version comes out: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.0-beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ You might consider labeling the beta versions something like 0.99+1.0beta4-1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.99+1.0beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Will try to have a look at the packaging itself later today. Cheers, Jeremy -- http://www.jerryweb.org/ : JerryWeb.org http://sailcut.sourceforge.net/ : Sailcut CAD http://mpf70.sourceforge.net/: MPman MP-F70 support for Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
- the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net mirrors yet. they do. From the CVS logs you seem to be part of the development team, so it might be simpler to have the upstream tarballs drop debian/* and just include these files in your diff.gz (which doesn't prevent you from keeping debian/* in the same CVS repository!). Yes, this is a problem, Pierre, please generate a proper .orig.gz tarball, without debian/ dir at all. no problem, I'm the release tech anyway. I'm on it. - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when the final 1.0 version comes out: Two dashes are perfectly valid according to Policy. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.0-beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. You might consider labeling the beta versions something like 0.99+1.0beta4-1. for historical reason I have to keep the dash atm. Will be dropped in favour of your suggestion above for next betas (i mean for other than 1.0 betas) and like said Peter, next version will be 1.0.0-1 and then no problem at all. Cheers, -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lain wrote: Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the package proper: - the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net mirrors yet. From the CVS logs you seem to be part of the development team, so it might be simpler to have the upstream tarballs drop debian/* and just include these files in your diff.gz (which doesn't prevent you from keeping debian/* in the same CVS repository!). Yes, this is a problem, Pierre, please generate a proper .orig.gz tarball, without debian/ dir at all. - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when the final 1.0 version comes out: Two dashes are perfectly valid according to Policy. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.0-beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. You might consider labeling the beta versions something like 0.99+1.0beta4-1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.99+1.0beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Will try to have a look at the packaging itself later today. Cheers, Jeremy Yours, Peter
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
no problem, I'm the release tech anyway. I'm on it. done. revision 2 is on its way on kalyxo, and as ever it's on http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/ and as ever lintian, linda and pdebuild clean. any remark ? -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:50 AM, Peter Rockai (mornfall) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lain wrote: [...] - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when the final 1.0 version comes out: Two dashes are perfectly valid according to Policy. Indeed; however, as Jeremy pointed out `1.0-beta4' is greater than `1.0' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.0-beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. You might consider labeling the beta versions something like 0.99+1.0beta4-1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.99+1.0beta4-1 lt 1.0-1 echo true true This, otoh, is a commonly used and well-known method of numbering versions so that the final release version is greater than the betas. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number? Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Christoph Wegscheider wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number? Indeed, in fact, where there will be a 1.1betax i'll use the 1.99-1+betax version number, that is really clear, and shorter than a 0.99-1+1.0-beta4 but in fact, the non-official debian repository where i dput my packages atm had a qdirty package named 1.0-beta1 and I had to produce version numbers greater than this one (the historical thing) starting with 1.0, my version numbering will follow a +betax scheme but for the 1.0 betas (and maybe pre versions) I'll have to follow the old scheme for backward compatibility -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:16 AM, Christoph Wegscheider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number? You're correct, of course. It's one of those mornings Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:20:23AM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: Hello! I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ (and I would like to start my NM application too). The will be available soon at : deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main You didn't put the following lines in debian/copyright (see [0] and [1]): Copyright (c) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Frerich Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (c) 2001, 2002, 2003 Frerich Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (c) 2003 Frerich Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (C) 2003 Georg Robbers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (C) 2004 by Sashmit Bhaduri Copyright (C) 2004 by Sashmit Bhaduri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Copyright (C) 2004 by Stanislav Karchebny Copyright (C) 2004 by Stanislav Karchebny, Sashmit Bhaduri Copyright (C) 2004 by Teemu Rytilahti Copyright (c) 2004 Frerich Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (C) 2004 Gary Cramblitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Some of the obove lines may be combined into one line. That was just a simplified output of: grep -ri copyright akregator-1.0_beta4fixed/akregator/src/ Please consider to put the URL of the home page of the package in the description in debian/control. See [2] and [3]. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg7.html [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200312/msg00194.html [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-upstream-info [3] http://people.debian.org/~walters/descriptions.html and is already at http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/ here you have the official releases : http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/vanilla/ (official site has not been updated, you can find them on [1] too) Here's the whereabouts of the package: o ITP Bug : 251871 (reported by Peter Rockai, but owned by me with his agreement. he is btw in Cc:) o the package is lintian and linda clean o he builds in pbuilder I also run pbuilder on your source package and lintian and linda on the .dsc created by pbuilder. Version: 1.0-beta4 Upstream Author: Stanislav Karchebny Url: http://akregator.upnet.ru/ Description: RSS feed aggregator for KDE aKregator is a KDE RSS aggregator. It supports the best known metaphors from existing aggregators. It also facilitates good integration with KDE by maintaining an interface similar to Konqueror and KMail. best regards. [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/akregator/ -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ Regards, Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux | Building 28C : :' : Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia `. `' http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/ `- | pgpoLN76jwymd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
You didn't put the following lines in debian/copyright (see [0] and [1]): [...] grep -ri copyright akregator-1.0_beta4fixed/akregator/src/ very good point. done Please consider to put the URL of the home page of the package in the description in debian/control. See [2] and [3]. done too it's still lintian and linda clean (didn't test pdebuild, but no modification to build process or to upstream has been done ...) dput-ed to kalyxo again, and as allways at [1] http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/ do you have any other advice/remark ? -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
Hello! I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ (and I would like to start my NM application too). The will be available soon at : deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main and is already at http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/ here you have the official releases : http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/vanilla/ (official site has not been updated, you can find them on [1] too) Here's the whereabouts of the package: o ITP Bug : 251871 (reported by Peter Rockai, but owned by me with his agreement. he is btw in Cc:) o the package is lintian and linda clean o he builds in pbuilder Version: 1.0-beta4 Upstream Author: Stanislav Karchebny Url: http://akregator.upnet.ru/ Description: RSS feed aggregator for KDE aKregator is a KDE RSS aggregator. It supports the best known metaphors from existing aggregators. It also facilitates good integration with KDE by maintaining an interface similar to Konqueror and KMail. best regards. [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/akregator/ -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE
Hello! I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ (and I would like to start my NM application too). The will be available soon at : deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main and is already at http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/ here you have the official releases : http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/vanilla/ (official site has not been updated, you can find them on [1] too) Here's the whereabouts of the package: o ITP Bug : 251871 (reported by Peter Rockai, but owned by me with his agreement. he is btw in Cc:) o the package is lintian and linda clean o he builds in pbuilder Version: 1.0-beta4 Upstream Author: Stanislav Karchebny Url: http://akregator.upnet.ru/ Description: RSS feed aggregator for KDE aKregator is a KDE RSS aggregator. It supports the best known metaphors from existing aggregators. It also facilitates good integration with KDE by maintaining an interface similar to Konqueror and KMail. best regards. [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/akregator/ -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
