Bug#661634: marked as done (RFS: fonts-play/1.002+20111215.1+ds1-1)
Your message dated Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:09:14 +0100 with message-id <1330528154.24068.30.camel@mas> and subject line Fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #661634, regarding RFS: fonts-play/1.002+20111215.1+ds1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 661634: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661634 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors and pkg-fontsers, I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "fonts-play". * Package name: fonts-play Version : 1.002+20111215.1+ds2-1 Upstream Authors: Jonas Hecksher : Dave Crossland * URL : http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/play/ * License : OFL-1.1 for font, Apache-2.0 for font-generation scripts Section : fonts It builds those binary packages: fonts-play - minimalistic sans serif typeface Changes: fonts-play (1.002+20111215.1+ds2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated to build using separate googlefontdirectory-tools * Standards-Version 3.9.3 - Set final DEP-5 Format: link The Reason for the "+ds2" is that the googlefontdirectory-tools stuff was removed from the tarball, plus that I already committed and tagged a bz2 tarball to the repo as +ds1, prior to learning that pristine-tar got some xz support :) The package is available at mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-play dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fonts-play/fonts-play_1.002+20111215.1+ds2-1.dsc Alternatively the source is kept in git at: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git;a=tree git clone git://git.debian.org/pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- Martin Erik Werner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Marking as fixed since sponsored. -- Martin Erik Werner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message ---
Bug#661634: RFS: fonts-play/1.002+20111215.1+ds1-1
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 12:06 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Uploaded. > > There are some warnings from fontlint, run: > > apt-get install fontforge-nox > find -iname *.ttf -o -iname *.otf -o -iname *.sfd -o -iname *.pfa -o > -iname *.pfb -o -iname *.bdf -o -iname *.pk -o -iname *.ttc -o -iname > *.pcf | xargs --no-run-if-empty fontlint > > The one lintian complaint (and the watch file) is an indicator of > upstream's practices being bogus. > Yes, I have reported those upstream, the patch only fixes some of the really low-hanging fruit. Hmm, gfd does increment font versions; but alas does not supply any tarballs accordingly, only "non-source" via google webfonts. -- Martin Erik Werner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#661634: RFS: fonts-play/1.002+20111215.1+ds1-1
Uploaded. There are some warnings from fontlint, run: apt-get install fontforge-nox find -iname *.ttf -o -iname *.otf -o -iname *.sfd -o -iname *.pfa -o -iname *.pfb -o -iname *.bdf -o -iname *.pk -o -iname *.ttc -o -iname *.pcf | xargs --no-run-if-empty fontlint The one lintian complaint (and the watch file) is an indicator of upstream's practices being bogus. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6FHWYt0z1=ur3gxkghxivh-xsutq+cmldkhqp4secv...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#661634: RFS: fonts-play/1.002+20111215.1+ds1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors and pkg-fontsers, I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "fonts-play". * Package name: fonts-play Version : 1.002+20111215.1+ds2-1 Upstream Authors: Jonas Hecksher : Dave Crossland * URL : http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/play/ * License : OFL-1.1 for font, Apache-2.0 for font-generation scripts Section : fonts It builds those binary packages: fonts-play - minimalistic sans serif typeface Changes: fonts-play (1.002+20111215.1+ds2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated to build using separate googlefontdirectory-tools * Standards-Version 3.9.3 - Set final DEP-5 Format: link The Reason for the "+ds2" is that the googlefontdirectory-tools stuff was removed from the tarball, plus that I already committed and tagged a bz2 tarball to the repo as +ds1, prior to learning that pristine-tar got some xz support :) The package is available at mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-play dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fonts-play/fonts-play_1.002+20111215.1+ds2-1.dsc Alternatively the source is kept in git at: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git;a=tree git clone git://git.debian.org/pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- Martin Erik Werner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: fonts-play
Quoting Martin Erik Werner (martinerikwer...@gmail.com): > Dear mentors and pkg-fontsers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fonts-play". The package is now ready for upload on my build machine (this is the verion you corrected after Paul Wise comments). Without objections, I'll upload it during the week-end. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: fonts-play
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 17:31 +0100, Martin Erik Werner wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 10:44 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > There is a precompiled Windows binary in the source package: > > > > tools/ttfautohint/ttfautohint002.exe > > > Facepalm! Removed. > > > I note a lot of the tools refer to /usr/local/bin/fontforge, that > > should be changed to using env or /usr/bin/fontforge > > > I've added a patch to fix this. > > > I wonder if the tools should be packaged separately since future > > Google fonts might use them too? Maybe Dave has some advice there. > > > Yes, this is true, and it's on my to-do, I am avoiding it for the first > release however, would I be wrong in doing so? > > > fontlint complaints to forward upstream: > > > > Play-Bold.ttf > > Validation Play-Bold ...Failed > > Self Intersecting Glyph > > > > Play-Regular.ttf > > The glyph named mu is mapped to U+00B5. > > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+03BC. > > The glyph named Delta is mapped to U+2206. > > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0394. > > Validation Play-Regular ...Failed > > Self Intersecting Glyph > > > > Play-Bold.otf > > A point in g is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in gcircumflex is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in gbreve is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in gdotaccent is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in gcommaaccent is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in eng is outside the font bounding box data. > > Validation Play-Bold ...Failed > > Self Intersecting Glyph > > Bad 'CFF ' table > > > > Play-Regular.otf > > The glyph named mu is mapped to U+00B5. > > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+03BC. > > The glyph named Delta is mapped to U+2206. > > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0394. > > A point in scedilla is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in perthousand.smcp is outside the font bounding box data. > > Validation Play-Regular ...Failed > > Self Intersecting Glyph > > Bad 'CFF ' table > > > Right, will do. > > > Relevant lintian complaints: > > > > P: fonts-play source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary > > tools/ttfautohint/ttfautohint002.exe > > P: fonts-play source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri > > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5 > Until the proposed versioned address has been finalised, I consider it > the friendliest compromise. But I may be wrong in this? > > > I: fonts-play source: debian-watch-file-is-missing > No good way that I can see to watch a mercurial repo, archives for > download have been suggested upstream, but those would be of the whole > directory and not relevant to looking for new versions of a specific > font anyways. > > > P: fonts-play: no-upstream-changelog > Should I be generating this from the revision history? > > > P: fonts-play: data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends > > > I've fixed this, is there anything more that would need doing for Ubuntu > in this, or is adding the pre-depends enough? > > I'm not subscribed to the lists, so do CC me. I have uploaded new versions to debexpo/mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-play dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fonts-play/fonts-play_1.002 +20111215.1-1.dsc ..and to git: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git;a=tree git clone git://git.debian.org/pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git I've tagged the RFS uploads for easy comparison: git diff debian/1.002+20111214.1-1_RFS1..debian/1.002 +20111214.1-1_RFS2 Not subscribed, please CC. Thanks, -- Martin Erik Werner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: fonts-play
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 10:44 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > There is a precompiled Windows binary in the source package: > > tools/ttfautohint/ttfautohint002.exe > Facepalm! Removed. > I note a lot of the tools refer to /usr/local/bin/fontforge, that > should be changed to using env or /usr/bin/fontforge > I've added a patch to fix this. > I wonder if the tools should be packaged separately since future > Google fonts might use them too? Maybe Dave has some advice there. > Yes, this is true, and it's on my to-do, I am avoiding it for the first release however, would I be wrong in doing so? > fontlint complaints to forward upstream: > > Play-Bold.ttf > Validation Play-Bold ...Failed > Self Intersecting Glyph > > Play-Regular.ttf > The glyph named mu is mapped to U+00B5. > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+03BC. > The glyph named Delta is mapped to U+2206. > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0394. > Validation Play-Regular ...Failed > Self Intersecting Glyph > > Play-Bold.otf > A point in g is outside the font bounding box data. > A point in gcircumflex is outside the font bounding box data. > A point in gbreve is outside the font bounding box data. > A point in gdotaccent is outside the font bounding box data. > A point in gcommaaccent is outside the font bounding box data. > A point in eng is outside the font bounding box data. > Validation Play-Bold ...Failed > Self Intersecting Glyph > Bad 'CFF ' table > > Play-Regular.otf > The glyph named mu is mapped to U+00B5. > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+03BC. > The glyph named Delta is mapped to U+2206. > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0394. > A point in scedilla is outside the font bounding box data. > A point in perthousand.smcp is outside the font bounding box data. > Validation Play-Regular ...Failed > Self Intersecting Glyph > Bad 'CFF ' table > Right, will do. > Relevant lintian complaints: > > P: fonts-play source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary > tools/ttfautohint/ttfautohint002.exe > P: fonts-play source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5 Until the proposed versioned address has been finalised, I consider it the friendliest compromise. But I may be wrong in this? > I: fonts-play source: debian-watch-file-is-missing No good way that I can see to watch a mercurial repo, archives for download have been suggested upstream, but those would be of the whole directory and not relevant to looking for new versions of a specific font anyways. > P: fonts-play: no-upstream-changelog Should I be generating this from the revision history? > P: fonts-play: data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends > I've fixed this, is there anything more that would need doing for Ubuntu in this, or is adding the pre-depends enough? I'm not subscribed to the lists, so do CC me. -- Martin Erik Werner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: fonts-play
There is a precompiled Windows binary in the source package: tools/ttfautohint/ttfautohint002.exe I note a lot of the tools refer to /usr/local/bin/fontforge, that should be changed to using env or /usr/bin/fontforge I wonder if the tools should be packaged separately since future Google fonts might use them too? Maybe Dave has some advice there. fontlint complaints to forward upstream: Play-Bold.ttf Validation Play-Bold ...Failed Self Intersecting Glyph Play-Regular.ttf The glyph named mu is mapped to U+00B5. But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+03BC. The glyph named Delta is mapped to U+2206. But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0394. Validation Play-Regular ...Failed Self Intersecting Glyph Play-Bold.otf A point in g is outside the font bounding box data. A point in gcircumflex is outside the font bounding box data. A point in gbreve is outside the font bounding box data. A point in gdotaccent is outside the font bounding box data. A point in gcommaaccent is outside the font bounding box data. A point in eng is outside the font bounding box data. Validation Play-Bold ...Failed Self Intersecting Glyph Bad 'CFF ' table Play-Regular.otf The glyph named mu is mapped to U+00B5. But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+03BC. The glyph named Delta is mapped to U+2206. But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0394. A point in scedilla is outside the font bounding box data. A point in perthousand.smcp is outside the font bounding box data. Validation Play-Regular ...Failed Self Intersecting Glyph Bad 'CFF ' table Relevant lintian complaints: P: fonts-play source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary tools/ttfautohint/ttfautohint002.exe P: fonts-play source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5 I: fonts-play source: debian-watch-file-is-missing P: fonts-play: no-upstream-changelog P: fonts-play: data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6fr6wgn28hdwfr3x-ba4aci_no_j3qngrcrwhtayuh...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: fonts-play
(CC'ing you just in case, though I think you're subscribed to pkg-fonts-devel) Quoting Martin Erik Werner (martinerikwer...@gmail.com): > Dear mentors and pkg-fontsers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fonts-play". I added it to my TODO list as I'm now sponsoring most of the font packages maintained under the team's umbrella. Please feel free to ping me in case it falls under the pile...:) Interesting that you used git for packaging. I think it opens the opportunity for those in the team who would like to use it rather than SVN (which is used for other packages maintained by pkg-fonts), to switch to git. Help in importing the current SVN repo in git would be appreciated. Most font packages in pkg-fonts SVN use an svn-buildpackage style layout. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: fonts-play
Dear mentors and pkg-fontsers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fonts-play".
My reason for packaging this font is that the game "Red Eclipse" (ITPed by me)
utilises it, and I plan on using fonts-play as a (build-(long story))dependency
for redeclipse-data.
* Package name: fonts-play
Version : 1.002+20111214.1-1
Upstream Authors: Jonas Hecksher
: Dave Crossland
* URL :
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/play/
* License : OFL-1.1 for font, Apache-2.0 for font-generation scripts
Section : fonts
It builds those binary packages:
fonts-play - minimalistic sans serif typeface
The package is available at debexpo/mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-play
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fonts-play/fonts-play_1.002+20111214.1-1.dsc
Alternatively the source is kept in git at:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git;a=tree
git clone git://git.debian.org/pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git
I have contacted Dave Crossland about the origin of the font, and he confirmed
that it was basically thrown over the wall from PlayType https://playtype.com/
(no longer mentioning it at all) to Google.
The patched-in makefiles are my attempt at contributing a fairly general build
method for all googlefontdirectory ttf fonts, (when i asked for one Dave pointed
out that none existed, and i was free to contribute one,) hence why they are a
bit excessive for only one font, but I'm using them now in the package to have
things setup correctly if they get implemented upstream.
The package is lintian and pbuilder clean, and has a get-orig-source target
which you may want to avoid on a slow connection (the GFD mercurial repo is
> 400MB)
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
--
Martin Erik Werner ("arand")
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Rapsv-Rq-8S@mell
