RFS: gnomecatalog
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". * Package name: gnomecatalog Version : 0.3.1-1.0 Upstream Author : José Sánchez Moreno * URL : https://launchpad.net/gnomecatalog * License : GPL Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: gnomecatalog - Cataloging software for CD, DVD, and hard disk files The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog/gnomecatalog_0.3.1-1.0.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards José Sánchez Moreno -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: gnomecatalog
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". * Package name: gnomecatalog Version : 0.3.1-1.0 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: gnomecatalog - Cataloging software for CD, DVD, and hard disk files The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog/gnomecatalog_0.3.1-1.0.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards José Sánchez Moreno -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gnomecatalog
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:23:59AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] > > * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] > > * License : [fill in] > > *cough* See next message to this list... Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt MetaCarta -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gnomecatalog
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". > > * Package name: gnomecatalog > Version : 0.3.1-1.0 That '.0' at the end isn't necessary. > Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] > * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] > * License : [fill in] *cough* > It builds these binary packages: > gnomecatalog - Cataloging software for CD, DVD, and hard disk files Do you have a long description? - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gnomecatalog
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". > > * Package name: gnomecatalog > Version : 0.3.1-1.0 > That '.0' at the end isn't necessary. Lintian notify a warning without it. I can remove it if you want > Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] > * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] > * License : [fill in] > *cough* > It builds these binary packages: > gnomecatalog - Cataloging software for CD, DVD, and hard disk files > Do you have a long description? Long description Cataloging software for CDs and DVDs. Catalog your dvds/cds and files. Generate thumbnails of the files in your disks via gnome thumbnailers and saves it for using in database. Save the metadata of the files. You can search in the metatada of mp3, avis, images (exif). Requirements This application requires GTK+ version 2.8.x. Other dependencies include: python-gtk2 (>2.3.96), python-pyvorbis, python-pysqlite2, python-gnome2, python-mmpython Regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gnomecatalog
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". > > > > * Package name: gnomecatalog > > Version : 0.3.1-1.0 > > > That '.0' at the end isn't necessary. > > Lintian notify a warning without it. > > I can remove it if you want The lintian warning is there for a reason, but adding .0 is not the correct fix. Is this the NMU warning? You may have a mismatch between Maintainer: and debian/changelog. You must use exactly the same name and email address in debian/changelog as you use in debian/control. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: gnomecatalog
On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". > > > > > > * Package name: gnomecatalog > > > Version : 0.3.1-1.0 > > > > > That '.0' at the end isn't necessary. > > > > Lintian notify a warning without it. > > > > I can remove it if you want > > The lintian warning is there for a reason, but adding .0 is not the > correct fix. > > Is this the NMU warning? > > You may have a mismatch between Maintainer: and debian/changelog. You > must use exactly the same name and email address in debian/changelog as > you use in debian/control. Many thanks. I have correct the issue. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog/ Regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gnomecatalog
El mié, 09-01-2008 a las 18:24 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno escribió: > On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". > > > > > > > > * Package name: gnomecatalog > > > > Version : 0.3.1-1.0 > > > > > > > That '.0' at the end isn't necessary. > > > > > > Lintian notify a warning without it. > > > > > > I can remove it if you want > > > > The lintian warning is there for a reason, but adding .0 is not the > > correct fix. > > > > Is this the NMU warning? > > > > You may have a mismatch between Maintainer: and debian/changelog. You > > must use exactly the same name and email address in debian/changelog as > > you use in debian/control. > > > > > Many thanks. I have correct the issue. > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog/ Hi José, just a couple of questions: - Compiling the package on debian sid, it fails because of the python stuff in debian/rules. You're forcing using python 2.5 in debian/rules but there's not such build-dependency. Removing the "DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION = 2.5" line, the package compiles perfectly with 2.4, so I don't understand that line. Anyway , the package does not follow current Debian Python policy, you should take a look to http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy. For this package, current Python policy is quite simple so you should not have any problem to fix it, if you have some questions don't doubt in asking to this list. I would recommend you using python-support as replacing dh_python by python-support is trivial. - Your postinst is maintaining some old debhelper generated code and it should be deleted. In fact, you can test that this is all you need in the file: #!/bin/sh #DEBHELPER# - Please, remove the commented lines in debian/rules as they're useless. - I've seen you have not a spanish comment in the .desktop file of the application. According to your name it seems you can add it :-). If not, tell it to me and I'll send the right spanish sentence to you. Regards. José L. signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
Re: RFS: gnomecatalog
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:14:50PM +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote: > El mié, 09-01-2008 a las 18:24 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno escribió: > > On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". > > > > > > > > > > * Package name: gnomecatalog > > > > > Version : 0.3.1-1.0 > > > > > Hi José, just a couple of questions: > - Your postinst is maintaining some old debhelper generated code and it > should be deleted. In fact, you can test that this is all you need in > the file: > #!/bin/sh > #DEBHELPER# If the postinst can be generated from scratch by debhelper, then just remove it entirely. It's sufficiently intelligent to eg. add set -e in that case (I don't know if that would happen with a shebang+template maintscripts). Justin
Re: RFS: gnomecatalog
On mié, 2008-01-09 at 19:16 +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote: > El mié, 09-01-2008 a las 19:14 +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez > escribió: > > El mié, 09-01-2008 a las 18:24 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno escribió: > > > On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". > > > > > > > > > > > > * Package name: gnomecatalog > > > > > > Version : 0.3.1-1.0 > > > > > > > > > > > That '.0' at the end isn't necessary. > > > > > > > > > > Lintian notify a warning without it. > > > > > > > > > > I can remove it if you want > > > > > > > > The lintian warning is there for a reason, but adding .0 is not the > > > > correct fix. > > > > > > > > Is this the NMU warning? > > > > > > > > You may have a mismatch between Maintainer: and debian/changelog. You > > > > must use exactly the same name and email address in debian/changelog as > > > > you use in debian/control. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks. I have correct the issue. > > > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog/ > > > > Hi José, just a couple of questions: > > - Compiling the package on debian sid, it fails because of the python > > stuff in debian/rules. You're forcing using python 2.5 in debian/rules > > but there's not such build-dependency. Removing the > > "DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION = 2.5" line, the package compiles perfectly > > with 2.4, so I don't understand that line. > > Anyway , the package does not follow current Debian Python policy, you > > should take a look to http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy. > > For this package, current Python policy is quite simple so you should > > not have any problem to fix it, if you have some questions don't doubt > > in asking to this list. I would recommend you using python-support as > > replacing dh_python by python-support is trivial. Now must compile in any python version. I have done the changes to use python-support. > > - Your postinst is maintaining some old debhelper generated code and it > > should be deleted. In fact, you can test that this is all you need in > > the file: > > #!/bin/sh > > #DEBHELPER# I have delete .postinst because is not necessary with python-support > > - Please, remove the commented lines in debian/rules as they're useless. > > > > - I've seen you have not a spanish comment in the .desktop file of the > > application. According to your name it seems you can add it :-). If not, > > tell it to me and I'll send the right spanish sentence to you. Yes, you are right. I can. I have put the spanish comment in desktop file. > > Regards. > > José L. > > > > I like this application very much, if you fix these problems I'll be > glad to sponsor the package. > > Cheers. > José L. Thanks a lot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gnomecatalog
On mié, 2008-01-09 at 19:14 +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote: > El mié, 09-01-2008 a las 18:24 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno escribió: > > On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". > > > > > > > > > > * Package name: gnomecatalog > > > > > Version : 0.3.1-1.0 > > > > > > > > > That '.0' at the end isn't necessary. > > > > > > > > Lintian notify a warning without it. > > > > > > > > I can remove it if you want > > > > > > The lintian warning is there for a reason, but adding .0 is not the > > > correct fix. > > > > > > Is this the NMU warning? > > > > > > You may have a mismatch between Maintainer: and debian/changelog. You > > > must use exactly the same name and email address in debian/changelog as > > > you use in debian/control. > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks. I have correct the issue. > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog/ > > Hi José, just a couple of questions: > - Compiling the package on debian sid, it fails because of the python > stuff in debian/rules. You're forcing using python 2.5 in debian/rules > but there's not such build-dependency. Removing the > "DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION = 2.5" line, the package compiles perfectly > with 2.4, so I don't understand that line. > Anyway , the package does not follow current Debian Python policy, you > should take a look to http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy. > For this package, current Python policy is quite simple so you should > not have any problem to fix it, if you have some questions don't doubt > in asking to this list. I would recommend you using python-support as > replacing dh_python by python-support is trivial. > > - Your postinst is maintaining some old debhelper generated code and it > should be deleted. In fact, you can test that this is all you need in > the file: > #!/bin/sh > #DEBHELPER# > > - Please, remove the commented lines in debian/rules as they're useless. > > - I've seen you have not a spanish comment in the .desktop file of the > application. According to your name it seems you can add it :-). If not, > tell it to me and I'll send the right spanish sentence to you. > > Regards. > José L. > I think. I have solves all issues with the package. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog/ Best Regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gnomecatalog (uploaded)
On 08/01/2008, José Sánchez Moreno wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog". FWIW, 0.3.3-3 just landed in NEW. -- Cyril Brulebois pgpYxby5Z4A1Z.pgp Description: PGP signature
