Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.1.0
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I will like to stress that this kind of stuff is bad:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/isa-support/-/blob/master/debian/altivec-
support.preinst.in#L10
base64 encoded binary in maint script and mktemp on /usr/lib
I have no idea about documentating why it is bad. But for the sake of history
we must learn of mistake, and document it
Bastien
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.18.0-2-rt-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
debian-policy depends on no packages.
Versions of packages debian-policy recommends:
ii libjs-sphinxdoc 4.5.0-4
Versions of packages debian-policy suggests:
pn doc-base
-- no debconf information