Re: compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-17 Thread sisi

  thanks, i already had looked at his site, and what he is doing looks
  very interesting. but i agree that i shouldn't need gnome, and i am
  going to try to compile GTK. if that doesn't work then i will plunge
  into dselect.
 
 Maybe I'm missing something, but why don't you just upgrade to testing and
 
 apt-get install gimp1.2
 
 ?

because i am wet behind the ears and upgrading to testing will directly
increase my postings on this list ten fold.

but i might do that anyway and get better at searching the archives.

grrr,
sisi
 



Re: compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-17 Thread Steven Hanley
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 02:39:09PM +0200, sisi wrote:
 
   thanks, i already had looked at his site, and what he is doing looks
   very interesting. but i agree that i shouldn't need gnome, and i am
   going to try to compile GTK. if that doesn't work then i will plunge
   into dselect.
  
  Maybe I'm missing something, but why don't you just upgrade to testing and
  
  apt-get install gimp1.2
  
  ?
 
 because i am wet behind the ears and upgrading to testing will directly
 increase my postings on this list ten fold.
 
 but i might do that anyway and get better at searching the archives.
 
 grrr,
 sisi

well I run potato with some extra packages on my box, the extra pacakges I get
by compiling them myself.

fortunately glib and gtk are really easy to compile for potato.

it is basically a case of grabbing the gtk and glib source packages and patch
files from the pool on a debian mirror and using dpkg-buildpackage on them.

If you want the easiest solution try 

add 

deb-src http://some.debian.mirror/debian unstable main contrib non-free

to your sources.list

then type 

apt-get source libgtk1.2 libglib1.2

then in that directory there will be a gtk and a glib directory, go into glib
and type 
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
install the resulting deb files,
do the same for gtk

you can infact say apt-get -b source and it does the building for you, however
I dont like doing it to this extent so hey.

See You
Steve

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wibble.net/~sjh/
Look Up In The Sky
   Is it a bird?  No
  Is it a plane?  No
 Is it a small blue banana?
YES



Re: compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-16 Thread sisi

  if you want to install ximian execute rm -rf / as root, the damage
  will be about the same.  
 
 Dude, I know we debian users are weird people, but hey, I know the ximian
 distro people try hard to get the packages right. A patch instead of a flame
 helps a lot more.
 
 There is Hadess's build of ximian gnome at
 http://www.hadess.net/idoru.shtml, you could try that as well.

thanks, i already had looked at his site, and what he is doing looks
very interesting. but i agree that i shouldn't need gnome, and i am
going to try to compile GTK. if that doesn't work then i will plunge
into dselect.
at the moment i am getting gimp 1.2 with the --display option from my
boyfriends debian PC. it works nicely. i'm also getting netscape that
way.

but i really want to find a solution because other wise i'm gonna go
running back to photoshop, and i want to avoid that.

gr,
sisi

   or is there some other solution like compling GTK
   myself (will i run into other dependancies?)
  
  install woody.   or backport the woody gnome packages to potato (ive
  done it, its a pain but it can be done, note its far LESS of a pain
  then ruining your system with that ximian crap).  
 
 But the main point here is that you dont need any GNOME stuff to get Gimp
 1.2 running, just gtk. I guess there are such gtk packages in debian as
 well, at least in testing; brave souls could try install those on a potato
 system? Dunno if it breaks anything, shouldnt gtk 1.2.x be compatible with
 gtk 1.2.y anyway?
 
 Not that I really know anything but this is how I do things, if they break,
 I fix them then :)
 
 Tuomas
 
 -- 
 
 .---  [EMAIL PROTECTED].|\,/|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -.
 +  www.ximian.com -  ()-@@  ,   tigert.gimp.org  +
 `-  art director   ,  `--')/   a gimp artist  ---'
 
 
 
 --  
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



Re: compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-15 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 04:30:08AM -0800, thus said Ethan Benson:
 On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:04:57PM +0200, sisi wrote:
  hoi all,
  
  i am trying to compile gimp 1.2, and it is asking for
  GTK + 1.2.8 or higher. So... i would like to know whether 
  there is ximian stuff for debian powerpc as i know
  that ximian for debian x86 has GTK + 1.2.10  ?
 
 if you want to install ximian execute rm -rf / as root, the damage
 will be about the same.  

Dude, I know we debian users are weird people, but hey, I know the ximian
distro people try hard to get the packages right. A patch instead of a flame
helps a lot more.

There is Hadess's build of ximian gnome at
http://www.hadess.net/idoru.shtml, you could try that as well.

  or is there some other solution like compling GTK
  myself (will i run into other dependancies?)
 
 install woody.   or backport the woody gnome packages to potato (ive
 done it, its a pain but it can be done, note its far LESS of a pain
 then ruining your system with that ximian crap).  

But the main point here is that you dont need any GNOME stuff to get Gimp
1.2 running, just gtk. I guess there are such gtk packages in debian as
well, at least in testing; brave souls could try install those on a potato
system? Dunno if it breaks anything, shouldnt gtk 1.2.x be compatible with
gtk 1.2.y anyway?

Not that I really know anything but this is how I do things, if they break,
I fix them then :)

Tuomas

-- 

.---  [EMAIL PROTECTED].|\,/|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -.
+  www.ximian.com -  ()-@@  ,   tigert.gimp.org  +
`-  art director   ,  `--')/   a gimp artist  ---'




compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-14 Thread sisi
hoi all,

i am trying to compile gimp 1.2, and it is asking for
GTK + 1.2.8 or higher. So... i would like to know whether 
there is ximian stuff for debian powerpc as i know
that ximian for debian x86 has GTK + 1.2.10  ?

or is there some other solution like compling GTK
myself (will i run into other dependancies?)

grts,
sisi



Re: compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-14 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:04:57PM +0200, sisi wrote:
 hoi all,
 
 i am trying to compile gimp 1.2, and it is asking for
 GTK + 1.2.8 or higher. So... i would like to know whether 
 there is ximian stuff for debian powerpc as i know
 that ximian for debian x86 has GTK + 1.2.10  ?

if you want to install ximian execute rm -rf / as root, the damage
will be about the same.  

 or is there some other solution like compling GTK
 myself (will i run into other dependancies?)

install woody.   or backport the woody gnome packages to potato (ive
done it, its a pain but it can be done, note its far LESS of a pain
then ruining your system with that ximian crap).  

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/


pgprRx8uzBGBG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-14 Thread sisi
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 04:30:08AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:04:57PM +0200, sisi wrote:
  hoi all,
  
  i am trying to compile gimp 1.2, and it is asking for
  GTK + 1.2.8 or higher. So... i would like to know whether 
  there is ximian stuff for debian powerpc as i know
  that ximian for debian x86 has GTK + 1.2.10  ?
 
 if you want to install ximian execute rm -rf / as root, the damage
 will be about the same.  
 
  or is there some other solution like compling GTK
  myself (will i run into other dependancies?)
 
 install woody.   or backport the woody gnome packages to potato (ive
 done it, its a pain but it can be done, note its far LESS of a pain
 then ruining your system with that ximian crap).  

LOL
in my reading about the subject i came across some posts from you 
about how much you hate ximian.   :)
so, 
apt-get dist-upgrade woody
that's all right?

thanks,
sisi

 -- 
 Ethan Benson
 http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/




Re: compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-14 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:50:19PM +0200, sisi wrote:

 so, 
 apt-get dist-upgrade woody
 that's all right?

no use dselect.  there are many packages that are split and apt-get
simply doesn't handle that (it ignores recommends).  

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/


pgpg2b7qqNoLn.pgp
Description: PGP signature