On 13 July 2017 at 11:46, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> On 10 July 2017 at 21:52, Tristan Seligmann
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 11:45 Michael Hudson-Doyle <
>> michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> python3-trollius fails tests with Python 3.6 and rather than think about
>>> why, I think it makes more sense to stop building trollius for Python 3.
>>>
>>
>> Sounds reasonable to me!
>>
>
> So a wrinkle here is that trollius-redis was packaged as it is a
> dependency of pagure. Pagure is currently Python 2 only so removing
> python3-trollius and python3-trollius-redis will not impede that effort in
> the short term, but it might make life harder as and when pagure does
> switch to Python 3. Of course, we could make the (reasonable sounding) bet
> that if pagure switches to Python 3, it will also switch to asyncio rather
> than depending on the deprecated trollius.
>
> What do you think? Having written the above out, I think it still makes
> sense to proceed with my plan. I'll start filing bugs and patches and
> looking for sponsors...
>
The bugs and patches are all at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=no-more-python3-trollius;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org
if someone wants to get their sponsoring boots on :)
Cheers,
mwh
