Bug#1073180: python-requests-unixsocket: please replace abandonned python-requests-unixsocket by src:python-requests-unixsocket2 fork
Source: python-requests-unixsocket Version: 0.3.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainers, python-requests-unixsocket is abandonned and was never adapted to work with urllib3 2.x released 2023-04-26. Please consider updating to this fork (versionned 0.4) https://gitlab.com/thelabnyc/requests-unixsocket2 > Since this project seems to be abandoned, > but its longevity is important to my team, > we've forked the project as requests-unixsocket2. > It should be a drop in replacement for this package. > > PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/requests-unixsocket2/0.4.0/ > Repository: https://gitlab.com/thelabnyc/requests-unixsocket2 Fedora already does that: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-requests-unixsocket/raw/rawhide/f/python-requests-unixsocket.spec I found out thanks to repology.com. Greetings
Bug#1073179: python-requests-cache: please apply patch for urlllib3 2.x compatibility
Source: python-requests-cache Version: 0.9.8-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainer, Please consider applying Ubuntu patch to add urllib3 2.x compatibility, or alternatively package a newer version of python-requests-cache https://patches.ubuntu.com/p/python-requests-cache/python-requests-cache_0.9.8-1ubuntu1.patch Greetings Alexandre
Bug#1073178: awscli: please update awsci and/or botocore to support urllib3 2.x
Source: awscli Version: 2.15.22-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org, Noah Meyerhans Dear Maintainers, Please update awscli and/or botocore to untangle the urllib3 2.x transition. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-urllib3 : see failing autopkgtests that leads here: https://github.com/aws/aws-cli/issues/7905 "cannot import name 'DEFAULT_CIPHERS' from 'urllib3.util.ssl_'" https://github.com/boto/botocore/pull/2924/files Greetings Alexandre
Re: Request for Python Team assistance in Debian Mentors
On Thu, 2024-06-13 at 16:54 +, weepingclown wrote: > Hi, > > The ruby team has a similar ruby-team/mentors namespace for newcomers. That > works quite nicely. > > Best, > Ananthu > > > On 13 June 2024 11:13:33 am UTC, "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" > wrote: > > Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote on 13/06/2024 at 12:48:36+0200: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:28:32AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > Dear Python Team Members, > > > > > > > > At present we have a number of Python related packages[1] within Debian > > > > Mentors[2]. Would it be possible for team members/DD's to offer their > > > > expert > > > > assistance to these submitters and their packages with a goal of upload > > > > to > > > > Debian where appropriate. > > > > > > > > Your time and assistance would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > [1] Package list, not exhaustive... > > > > > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-keep/ > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-autodocsumm/ > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-radexreader/ > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/anytree/ > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/browser-cookie3/ > > > > > > > > > > I'm always hesitant to look at Python module RFSes because on one hand I > > > would like all of them to be in the team but on the other hand I'm not > > > sure if it makes sense to write "please move this to DPT" or "please > > > consider moving this to DPT", especially for people who are first time > > > packages without a team membership. > > > Perhaps we should discuss this and find a single recommended practice for > > > such packages. > > > > > > > I really think we should encourage newcomers to apply joining the team > > and put their packages there. > > > > What we could do if the idea of giving broad commit rights to newcomers > > poses issues is to create a specific namespace in python-team for > > newcomers. (then we'd need to have some migration plan and then oh dear) > > Hi all, Many thanks for the pointer to the Ruby Team. Their approach looks interesting. If the Python Team were be able to consider a similar approach that of course fits the teams particular needs it could prove very productive overall for the team and newcomers. Regards Phil -- Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Request for Python Team assistance in Debian Mentors
Hi, That's a good idea. IIRC Rust Team has a similar idea for newcomers. On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 04:54:27PM +, weepingclown wrote: > Hi, > > The ruby team has a similar ruby-team/mentors namespace for newcomers. That > works quite nicely. > > Best, > Ananthu > > On 13 June 2024 11:13:33 am UTC, "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" > wrote: > >Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote on 13/06/2024 at 12:48:36+0200: > > > >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:28:32AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > >>> Dear Python Team Members, > >>> > >>> At present we have a number of Python related packages[1] within Debian > >>> Mentors[2]. Would it be possible for team members/DD's to offer their > >>> expert > >>> assistance to these submitters and their packages with a goal of upload to > >>> Debian where appropriate. > >>> > >>> Your time and assistance would be greatly appreciated. > >>> > >>> [1] Package list, not exhaustive... > >>> > >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-keep/ > >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-autodocsumm/ > >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-radexreader/ > >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/anytree/ > >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/browser-cookie3/ > >> I'm always hesitant to look at Python module RFSes because on one hand I > >> would like all of them to be in the team but on the other hand I'm not > >> sure if it makes sense to write "please move this to DPT" or "please > >> consider moving this to DPT", especially for people who are first time > >> packages without a team membership. > >> Perhaps we should discuss this and find a single recommended practice for > >> such packages. > > > >I really think we should encourage newcomers to apply joining the team > >and put their packages there. > > > >What we could do if the idea of giving broad commit rights to newcomers > >poses issues is to create a specific namespace in python-team for > >newcomers. (then we'd need to have some migration plan and then oh dear) > > > >-- > >PEB > > -- cheers, Emmanuel Arias ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ eam...@debian.org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5 FA9DEC5DE11C63F1 ⠈⠳⣄ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Request for Python Team assistance in Debian Mentors
Hi, The ruby team has a similar ruby-team/mentors namespace for newcomers. That works quite nicely. Best, Ananthu On 13 June 2024 11:13:33 am UTC, "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" wrote: >Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote on 13/06/2024 at 12:48:36+0200: > >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:28:32AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> Dear Python Team Members, >>> >>> At present we have a number of Python related packages[1] within Debian >>> Mentors[2]. Would it be possible for team members/DD's to offer their expert >>> assistance to these submitters and their packages with a goal of upload to >>> Debian where appropriate. >>> >>> Your time and assistance would be greatly appreciated. >>> >>> [1] Package list, not exhaustive... >>> >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-keep/ >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-autodocsumm/ >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-radexreader/ >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/anytree/ >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/browser-cookie3/ >> I'm always hesitant to look at Python module RFSes because on one hand I >> would like all of them to be in the team but on the other hand I'm not >> sure if it makes sense to write "please move this to DPT" or "please >> consider moving this to DPT", especially for people who are first time >> packages without a team membership. >> Perhaps we should discuss this and find a single recommended practice for >> such packages. > >I really think we should encourage newcomers to apply joining the team >and put their packages there. > >What we could do if the idea of giving broad commit rights to newcomers >poses issues is to create a specific namespace in python-team for >newcomers. (then we'd need to have some migration plan and then oh dear) > >-- >PEB >
Bug#1073139: ITP: nwg-displays -- output management utility for Wayland compositors like Sway
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Maytham Alsudany X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: nwg-displays Version : 0.3.20 Upstream Contact: https://github.com/nwg-piotr/nwg-displays/issues * URL : https://github.com/nwg-piotr/nwg-displays * License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Description : output management utility for Wayland compositors like Sway nwg-displays is an output management utility for sway and Hyprland Wayland compositors, inspired by wdisplays and wlay. The program is expected to: - provide an intuitive GUI to manage multiple displays; - apply settings; - save outputs configuration to a text file; - save workspace -> output assignments to a text file; - support sway and Hyprland only. Will be maintained under DPT. Will need sponsor to upload to NEW. -- Kind regards, Maytham Alsudany signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Request for Python Team assistance in Debian Mentors
Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote on 13/06/2024 at 12:48:36+0200: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:28:32AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: >> Dear Python Team Members, >> >> At present we have a number of Python related packages[1] within Debian >> Mentors[2]. Would it be possible for team members/DD's to offer their expert >> assistance to these submitters and their packages with a goal of upload to >> Debian where appropriate. >> >> Your time and assistance would be greatly appreciated. >> >> [1] Package list, not exhaustive... >> >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-keep/ >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-autodocsumm/ >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-radexreader/ >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/anytree/ >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/browser-cookie3/ > I'm always hesitant to look at Python module RFSes because on one hand I > would like all of them to be in the team but on the other hand I'm not > sure if it makes sense to write "please move this to DPT" or "please > consider moving this to DPT", especially for people who are first time > packages without a team membership. > Perhaps we should discuss this and find a single recommended practice for > such packages. I really think we should encourage newcomers to apply joining the team and put their packages there. What we could do if the idea of giving broad commit rights to newcomers poses issues is to create a specific namespace in python-team for newcomers. (then we'd need to have some migration plan and then oh dear) -- PEB
Re: Request for Python Team assistance in Debian Mentors
On Thu, 2024-06-13 at 15:48 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:28:32AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > Dear Python Team Members, > > > > At present we have a number of Python related packages[1] within Debian > > Mentors[2]. Would it be possible for team members/DD's to offer their expert > > assistance to these submitters and their packages with a goal of upload to > > Debian where appropriate. > > > > Your time and assistance would be greatly appreciated. > > > > [1] Package list, not exhaustive... > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-keep/ > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-autodocsumm/ > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-radexreader/ > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/anytree/ > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/browser-cookie3/ > I'm always hesitant to look at Python module RFSes because on one hand I > would like all of them to be in the team but on the other hand I'm not > sure if it makes sense to write "please move this to DPT" or "please > consider moving this to DPT", especially for people who are first time > packages without a team membership. > Perhaps we should discuss this and find a single recommended practice for > such packages. > Hi, This sounds very reasonable. I think we would value the opinion of Python Team members on how they would like to handle new packages/members coming via mentors that would integrate well into their team/workflow. Regards Phil -- Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Request for Python Team assistance in Debian Mentors
On Thu, 2024-06-13 at 12:36 +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Hey, > > Phil Wyett wrote on 13/06/2024 at 08:28:32+0200: > > > Dear Python Team Members, > > > > At present we have a number of Python related packages[1] within Debian > > Mentors[2]. Would it be possible for team members/DD's to offer their expert > > assistance to these submitters and their packages with a goal of upload to > > Debian where appropriate. > > > > Your time and assistance would be greatly appreciated. > > > > [1] Package list, not exhaustive... > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-keep/ > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-autodocsumm/ > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-radexreader/ > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/anytree/ > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/browser-cookie3/ > > > > [2] https://mentors.debian.net/packages/ > > Thanks for poking us. > > I can't promise that it will be fast but I'll try to give it some time. > > Bests, > Thanks. All assistance is appreciated. Regards Phil -- Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Request for Python Team assistance in Debian Mentors
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:28:32AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > Dear Python Team Members, > > At present we have a number of Python related packages[1] within Debian > Mentors[2]. Would it be possible for team members/DD's to offer their expert > assistance to these submitters and their packages with a goal of upload to > Debian where appropriate. > > Your time and assistance would be greatly appreciated. > > [1] Package list, not exhaustive... > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-keep/ > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-autodocsumm/ > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-radexreader/ > https://mentors.debian.net/package/anytree/ > https://mentors.debian.net/package/browser-cookie3/ I'm always hesitant to look at Python module RFSes because on one hand I would like all of them to be in the team but on the other hand I'm not sure if it makes sense to write "please move this to DPT" or "please consider moving this to DPT", especially for people who are first time packages without a team membership. Perhaps we should discuss this and find a single recommended practice for such packages. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Request for Python Team assistance in Debian Mentors
Hey, Phil Wyett wrote on 13/06/2024 at 08:28:32+0200: > Dear Python Team Members, > > At present we have a number of Python related packages[1] within Debian > Mentors[2]. Would it be possible for team members/DD's to offer their expert > assistance to these submitters and their packages with a goal of upload to > Debian where appropriate. > > Your time and assistance would be greatly appreciated. > > [1] Package list, not exhaustive... > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-keep/ > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-autodocsumm/ > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-radexreader/ > https://mentors.debian.net/package/anytree/ > https://mentors.debian.net/package/browser-cookie3/ > > [2] https://mentors.debian.net/packages/ Thanks for poking us. I can't promise that it will be fast but I'll try to give it some time. Bests, -- PEB signature.asc Description: PGP signature
