Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Dear release team, > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:31:31PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:50:25AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: Indeed, is there an ETA for this bug? At least for the unstable (i.e. with maintainer QA) version. FWIW as the fix looks trivial I think it is worth keeping the package. >>> I disagree. I doubt that the version in unstable/testing is useful for >>> anyone, and if it is, it is still available in etch anyway. >>> So I would go for removing it from testing. >> Fair enough, given also the low popcon > > I recommend to remove ltp/20060918-3 from testing removal hint added Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all
Dear release team, On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:31:31PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:50:25AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > > Indeed, is there an ETA for this bug? At least for the unstable (i.e. with > > > maintainer QA) version. > > > > > > FWIW as the fix looks trivial I think it is worth keeping the package. > > > > I disagree. I doubt that the version in unstable/testing is useful for > > anyone, and if it is, it is still available in etch anyway. > > So I would go for removing it from testing. > > Fair enough, given also the low popcon I recommend to remove ltp/20060918-3 from testing Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:50:25AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:59:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote: > > > >> I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you > > > >> disagree, > > > >> please reply to this message by Thijs Kinkhorst: > > > >> > > > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;mbox=yes;bug=496411 > > > > I confirm the README.Debian is present. > > > But not in the affected binary package. > > Indeed, is there an ETA for this bug? At least for the unstable (i.e. with > > maintainer QA) version. > > > > FWIW as the fix looks trivial I think it is worth keeping the package. > > I disagree. I doubt that the version in unstable/testing is useful for > anyone, and if it is, it is still available in etch anyway. > So I would go for removing it from testing. Fair enough, given also the low popcon filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it. -- Oscar Wilde signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:50:25AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:59:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote: > > >> I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you > > >> disagree, > > >> please reply to this message by Thijs Kinkhorst: > > >> > > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;mbox=yes;bug=496411 > > > I confirm the README.Debian is present. > > But not in the affected binary package. > Indeed, is there an ETA for this bug? At least for the unstable (i.e. with > maintainer QA) version. > > FWIW as the fix looks trivial I think it is worth keeping the package. I disagree. I doubt that the version in unstable/testing is useful for anyone, and if it is, it is still available in etch anyway. So I would go for removing it from testing. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:59:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> On Thursday 20 November 2008 03:25:41 Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> > I have found all of the reported issues in BOTH versions marked as fixed. > >> > Please stop blindly closing this report and *do verify* everything is > >> > fixed. > >> > >> I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you > >> disagree, > >> please reply to this message by Thijs Kinkhorst: > >> > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;mbox=yes;bug=496411 > > > > I confirm the README.Debian is present. > > But not in the affected binary package. Indeed, is there an ETA for this bug? At least for the unstable (i.e. with maintainer QA) version. FWIW as the fix looks trivial I think it is worth keeping the package. filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: Recursion is the root of computation since it trades description for time. -- Alan Perlis signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all
fixed 496411 20060918-3 thanks On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote: > Hello, > > On Thursday 20 November 2008 03:25:41 Raphael Geissert wrote: > > I have found all of the reported issues in BOTH versions marked as fixed. > > Please stop blindly closing this report and *do verify* everything is > > fixed. > > I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you disagree, > please reply to this message by Thijs Kinkhorst: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;mbox=yes;bug=496411 I confirm the README.Debian is present. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all
2008/11/22 Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > fixed 496411 20060918-3 > thanks You didn't send a copy of the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], nothing was done. > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Thursday 20 November 2008 03:25:41 Raphael Geissert wrote: >> > I have found all of the reported issues in BOTH versions marked as fixed. >> > Please stop blindly closing this report and *do verify* everything is >> > fixed. >> >> I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you disagree, >> please reply to this message by Thijs Kinkhorst: >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;mbox=yes;bug=496411 > > I confirm the README.Debian is present. But not in the affected binary package. sid's package has: /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/copyright /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/network.txt.gz but no readme.Debian experimental has: /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/README.network_stress /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/README.network_stress/README.gz /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/copyright /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/network_stress.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/network.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/ltp-network-test/README.gz the last file belonging to LTP itself. After taking a look at the source package I noticed the README is being installed in ltp-tools. And that's what should be fixed, as ltp-tools by itself is not affected while ltp-network-test is (and they don't share a doc/ltp dir either). P.S. I apologise for being rude on my previous email. > > Cheers, > Moritz > Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.debian.net P. J. O'Rourke - "Never wear anything that panics the cat." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all
Hello, On Thursday 20 November 2008 03:25:41 Raphael Geissert wrote: > I have found all of the reported issues in BOTH versions marked as fixed. > Please stop blindly closing this report and *do verify* everything is > fixed. I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you disagree, please reply to this message by Thijs Kinkhorst: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;mbox=yes;bug=496411 Regards Jiri Palecek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all
found 496411 20060918-3
found 496411 20081031+dfsg-1
thanks
I have found all of the reported issues in BOTH versions marked as fixed.
Please stop blindly closing this report and *do verify* everything is fixed.
Attached are the results of a quick grep on both packages.
Regards,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
grep -r /tmp/ -A5 -B5 usr/lib/debian-test/tests/linux/ 2>/dev/null | cut -d/
-f8-
rwtest01%f
ns-udpsender matches
test_1_to_1_nonblock matches
test_1_to_1_connectx matches
test_1_to_1_socket_bind_listen matches
opts_e matches
--
nfsstress-
nfsstress-# Setting the NFS to version 2 with UDP by default
nfsstress-PID=$$
nfsstress-VERSION=${VERSION:=2}
nfsstress-SOCKET_TYPE=${SOCKET_TYPE:=udp}
nfsstress:TESTDIR=${TESTDIR:=/tmp/$TC$PID.testdir}
nfsstress-NFS_TYPE=${NFS_TYPE:=nfs}
nfsstress-
nfsstress-# If CLEANUP is not set; set it to "ON"
nfsstress-CLEANUP=${CLEANUP:="ON"}
nfsstress-
test_1_to_1_events matches
test_assoc_abort matches
ns-mcast_join matches
open_files matches
test_1_to_1_sendmsg matches
--
nfs01-
nfs01-VERSION=${VERSION:=2}
nfs01-RHOST=${RHOST:=`hostname`}
nfs01-NFILES=${NFILES:=1000}
nfs01-SOCKET_TYPE=${SOCKET_TYPE:=udp}
nfs01:TESTDIR=${TESTDIR:=/tmp/$TC$PID.testdir}
nfs01-NFS_TYPE=${NFS_TYPE:=nfs}
nfs01-
nfs01-echo ""
nfs01-echo "Test Options:"
nfs01-echo " VERSION: $VERSION"
test_recvmsg matches
test_sockopt matches
ltpServer matches
test_1_to_1_send matches
test_sockopt_v6 matches
rpc1 matches
test_1_to_1_addrs matches
opts matches
test_inaddr_any_v6 matches
--
xinetd_tests.sh-trap "cleanup" 0
xinetd_tests.sh-
xinetd_tests.sh-# create the temporary directory used by this testcase
xinetd_tests.sh-if [ -z $TMP ]
xinetd_tests.sh-then
xinetd_tests.sh:LTPTMP=/tmp/tst_xinetd.$$
xinetd_tests.sh-else
xinetd_tests.sh-LTPTMP=$TMP/tst_xinetd.$$
xinetd_tests.sh-fi
xinetd_tests.sh-
xinetd_tests.sh-mkdir -p $LTPTMP &>/dev/null || RC=$?
--
traceroute_tests.sh-trap "cleanup" 0
traceroute_tests.sh-
traceroute_tests.sh-# create the temporary directory used by this testcase
traceroute_tests.sh-if [ -z $TMP ]
traceroute_tests.sh-then
traceroute_tests.sh:LTPTMP=/tmp/tst_traceroute.$$
traceroute_tests.sh-else
traceroute_tests.sh-LTPTMP=$TMP/tst_traceroute.$$
traceroute_tests.sh-fi
traceroute_tests.sh-
traceroute_tests.sh-mkdir -p $LTPTMP &>/dev/null || RC=$?
--
tcpdump01-#Uncomment line below for debug output.
tcpdump01-#trace_logic=${trace_logic:-"set -x"}
tcpdump01-$trace_logic
tcpdump01-
tcpdump01-TC=tcpdump
tcpdump01:TCtmp=${TCtmp:-/tmp/$TC$$}
tcpdump01-RHOST=${RHOST:-`hostname`}
tcpdump01-IFNAME=${IFNAME:-$(netstat -i -n | grep "^[b-z]\{2,4\}[0-9][^*]" |
awk '{print $1}' | head -n1)}
tcpdump01-NUMLOOPS=${NUMLOOPS:-20}
tcpdump01-OUTFILE=$TCtmp/tcpdump_out
tcpdump01-LTPROOT=${LTPROOT:-"../../../../"}
test_1_to_1_connect matches
nfs04_create_file matches
test_1_to_1_recvmsg matches
--
nfs03-PID=$$
nfs03-
nfs03-# Setting the NFS to version 2 by default
nfs03-VERSION=${VERSION:=2}
nfs03-SOCKET_TYPE=${SOCKET_TYPE:=udp}
nfs03:TESTDIR=${TESTDIR:=/tmp/$TC$PID.testdir}
nfs03-NFS_TYPE=${NFS_TYPE:=nfs}
nfs03-
nfs03-# If CLEANUP is not set; set it to "ON"
nfs03-CLEANUP=${CLEANUP:="ON"}
nfs03-
test_1_to_1_sockopt matches
ns-igmp_querier matches
test_basic_v6 matches
ns-udpclient matches
test_assoc_shutdown matches
ns-icmpv6_sender matches
test_1_to_1_shutdown matches
ns-tcpserver matches
test_inaddr_any matches
pingpong matches
test_fragments_v6 matches
--
dhcpd_tests.sh- export TCID="dhcpd " # this is the init function.
dhcpd_tests.sh- export TST_COUNT=0 # init identifier,
dhcpd_tests.sh-
dhcpd_tests.sh- if [ -z $TMP ]
dhcpd_tests.sh- then
dhcpd_tests.sh: LTPTMP=/tmp/tst_dhcpd.$$/
dhcpd_tests.sh- else
dhcpd_tests.sh- LTPTMP=$TMP/tst_dhcpd.$$/
dhcpd_tests.sh- fi
dhcpd_tests.sh-
dhcpd_tests.sh- # Initialize cleanup function.
--
nfsstat01-
nfsstat01-PID=$$
nfsstat01-
nfsstat01-TC=nfsstat01
nfsstat01-TCbin=${TCbin:=`pwd`}
nfsstat01:EXPORTDIR=${EXPORTDIR:=/tmp/$TC$PID}
nfsstat01-HOST=`hostname`
nfsstat01-CLEANUP=${CLEANUP:="ON"}
nfsstat01-VERSION=${VERSION:=2}
nfsstat01:TESTDIR=${TESTDIR:=/tmp/$TC$PID.testdir}
nfsstat01-NFS_TYPE=${NFS_TYPE:nfs}
nfsstat01-
nfsstat01-if [ "x$NFS_TYPE" != "xnfs4" ]; then
nfsstat01-OPTS=${OPTS:="-o vers=$VERSION "}
nfsstat01-fi
test_connectx matches
--
nfs02-PID=$$
nfs02-
nfs02-RHOST=${RHOST:=`hostname`}
nfs02-VERSION=${VERSION:=2}
nfs02-SOCKET_TYPE=${SOCKET_TYPE:=udp}
nfs02:TESTDIR=${TESTDIR:=/tmp/$TC$PID.testdir}
nfs02-CLEANUP=${CLEANUP:="ON"}
nfs02-NFS_TYPE=${NFS_TYPE:=nfs}
nfs02-
nfs02-#-#
nfs02-# FUNCTION: do_setup
ns-tcpclient matches
test_1_to_1_recvfrom matches
rpc_server matches
ltpClient matches
--
mc_cmds-#Uncomment line below for debug output.
mc_cmds-#trace_logic=${trace_logic:-"set -
