Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#1027407: ruby-rubygems: kernel_require.rb LoadError breaks dhelp
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 dhelp Bug #1027407 [ruby-rubygems] ruby-rubygems: kernel_require.rb LoadError breaks dhelp Bug reassigned from package 'ruby-rubygems' to 'dhelp'. No longer marked as found in versions rubygems/3.3.15-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1027407 to the same values previously set > severity -1 serious Bug #1027407 [dhelp] ruby-rubygems: kernel_require.rb LoadError breaks dhelp Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > retitle: dhelp: depends on module removed from the Ruby stdlib (dbm) Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. -- 1027407: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027407 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#414092: airport-utils: Tools start and quit immediately without working
Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #414092 [airport-utils] airport-utils: Tools start and quit immediately without working Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > found -1 airport-utils/2-8 Bug #414092 [airport-utils] airport-utils: Tools start and quit immediately without working Marked as found in versions airport-utils/2-8. -- 414092: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=414092 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#981637: ifscheme: ifup no longer recognises interface names with ifscheme suffixes
Processing control commands: > tags -1 = confirmed Bug #981637 [ifscheme] ifscheme: ifup no longer recognises interface names with ifscheme suffixes Added tag(s) confirmed. > severity serious Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. -- 981637: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=981637 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: json11: Upstream dead, known encoding bugs
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1026373 [src:json11] json11: Upstream dead, known encoding bugs Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1026373: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026373 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1024824: The software outputs: "No access to printer device file". Normal user should be added to lp group to make `mtink` work and it has been added to it indeed, so it is in the /
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1024824 The software outputs: "No access to printer device file" Bug #1024824 [mtink] The software outputs: "No access to printer device file". Normal user should be added to lp group to make `mtink` work and it has been added to it indeed, so it is in the /etc/group file beside the `lp` and `lpadmin` groups, yet the software seems to be unable to access device file from the USB-conncted EPSON XP-2100. Dependencies and suggestions are installed in the system. I have experienced this package to be working on Ubuntu 22.04 a month ago. Changed Bug title to 'The software outputs: "No access to printer device file"' from 'The software outputs: "No access to printer device file". Normal user should be added to lp group to make `mtink` work and it has been added to it indeed, so it is in the /etc/group file beside the `lp` and `lpadmin` groups, yet the software seems to be unable to access device file from the USB-conncted EPSON XP-2100. Dependencies and suggestions are installed in the system. I have experienced this package to be working on Ubuntu 22.04 a month ago.'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1024824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024824 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#1024327: gv hangs on any file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1023330 - experimental
Bug #1023330 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [ghostscript]
ghostscript 10.0.0~dfsg-6: x11 support missing, thus 'gv 1:3.7.4-2+b1' is
failing
Bug #1024318 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [ghostscript]
gv: x11 output driver not found
Bug #1024327 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [ghostscript] gv
hangs on any file
Removed tag(s) experimental.
Removed tag(s) experimental.
Removed tag(s) experimental.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1023330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023330
1024318: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024318
1024327: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024327
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1024327: gv hangs on any file
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ghostscript
Bug #1024327 [gv] gv hangs on any file
Bug reassigned from package 'gv' to 'ghostscript'.
No longer marked as found in versions gv/1:3.7.4-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1024327 to the same values
previously set
> forcemerge 1023330 -1
Bug #1023330 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [ghostscript]
ghostscript 10.0.0~dfsg-6: x11 support missing, thus 'gv 1:3.7.4-2+b1' is
failing
Bug #1024318 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [ghostscript]
gv: x11 output driver not found
Bug #1024318 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [ghostscript]
gv: x11 output driver not found
Added tag(s) experimental.
Added tag(s) experimental.
Bug #1024327 [ghostscript] gv hangs on any file
Marked Bug as done
Marked as fixed in versions ghostscript/10.0.0~dfsg-8.
Marked as found in versions ghostscript/10.0.0~dfsg-6.
Merged 1023330 1024318 1024327
> affects -1 gv
Bug #1024327 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [ghostscript] gv
hangs on any file
Bug #1023330 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [ghostscript]
ghostscript 10.0.0~dfsg-6: x11 support missing, thus 'gv 1:3.7.4-2+b1' is
failing
Bug #1024318 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [ghostscript]
gv: x11 output driver not found
Added indication that 1024327 affects gv
Added indication that 1023330 affects gv
Added indication that 1024318 affects gv
--
1023330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023330
1024318: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024318
1024327: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024327
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: python-pam: Debian differences not clearly separated from upstream source
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #562702 [python-pam] python-pam: Debian differences not clearly separated from upstream source Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 562702: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562702 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed (with 1 error): Re: python-bayespy: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: module 'inspect' has no attribute 'getargspec'
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 python3-nose Bug #1025021 [src:python-bayespy] python-bayespy: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: module 'inspect' has no attribute 'getargspec' Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-bayespy' to 'python3-nose'. No longer marked as found in versions python-bayespy/0.5.22-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1025021 to the same values previously set > tags -1 ftbfs patch pending upstream Bug #1025021 [python3-nose] python-bayespy: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: module 'inspect' has no attribute 'getargspec' Added tag(s) ftbfs, patch, upstream, and pending. > tags -1 - bookworm sid Bug #1025021 [python3-nose] python-bayespy: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: module 'inspect' has no attribute 'getargspec' Removed tag(s) bookworm and sid. > merge 1024235 -1 Bug #1024235 [python3-nose] python3-nose: nose doesn't work with Python 3.11 due to use of removed inspect.getargspec() Unable to merge bugs because: affects of #1025021 is 'src:python3-defaults' not '' Failed to merge 1024235: Did not alter merged bugs. > affects -1 src:python-bayespy Bug #1025021 [python3-nose] python-bayespy: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: module 'inspect' has no attribute 'getargspec' Added indication that 1025021 affects src:python-bayespy -- 1024235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024235 1025021: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025021 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++
Processing control commands: > tags -1 fixed-upstream Bug #992981 [autoconf] autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++ Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. -- 992981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992981 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Shouldn't be a native Debian package
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #673406 [dnprogs] Shouldn't be a native Debian package Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist' -- 673406: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673406 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#941296: tuxcmd-modules FTCBFS: uses build architecture build tools
Processing control commands:
> found 941296 0.6.70+ds-5.1
Bug #941296 {Done: Chris Lamb } [src:tuxcmd-modules]
tuxcmd-modules FTCBFS: uses build architecture build tools
Marked as found in versions tuxcmd-modules/0.6.70+ds-5.1; no longer marked as
fixed in versions tuxcmd-modules/0.6.70+ds-5.1 and reopened.
--
941296: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941296
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#941296: tuxcmd-modules FTCBFS: uses build architecture build tools
Processing control commands: > found 941296 0.6.70+ds-5.1 Bug #941296 [src:tuxcmd-modules] tuxcmd-modules FTCBFS: uses build architecture build tools Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #941296 to the same values previously set -- 941296: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941296 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: ghostscript-doc: missing HTML files, package almost empty
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1024896 10.0.0~dfsg-6 Bug #1024896 [ghostscript-doc] ghostscript-doc: missing HTML files, package almost empty Marked as found in versions ghostscript/10.0.0~dfsg-6. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1024896: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024896 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: dnprogs: obsolete? time to remove?
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #1021094 [src:dnprogs] dnprogs: obsolete? time to remove? Bug reassigned from package 'src:dnprogs' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1021094 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1021094 to the same values previously set > retitle -1 RM: dnprogs -- RoQA; obsolete; orphaned; bad packaging Bug #1021094 [ftp.debian.org] dnprogs: obsolete? time to remove? Changed Bug title to 'RM: dnprogs -- RoQA; obsolete; orphaned; bad packaging' from 'dnprogs: obsolete? time to remove?'. -- 1021094: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021094 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1022526: python-ssdeep: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class must subclass Command
Processing control commands: > tags -1 fixed-upstream Bug #1022526 [src:python-ssdeep] python-ssdeep: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class must subclass Command Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. -- 1022526: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022526 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1011500 + pending patch Bug #1011500 [src:tuxcmd-modules] tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1011500 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1011500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011500 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1011500 + pending patch Bug #1011500 [src:tuxcmd-modules] tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries Added tag(s) pending. > tags 941296 + pending patch Bug #941296 [src:tuxcmd-modules] tuxcmd-modules FTCBFS: uses build architecture build tools Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1011500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011500 941296: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941296 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: Identify original submitter of tac_plus package
Hi Neil, thanks for all the information you gave. Now having all the information history and considerations, i think that effectively the best approach seems to be pushing our code in a github repository and see if people are interested in it. Thanks for your reply. Le mer. 9 nov. 2022 à 09:32, Neil Williams a écrit : > On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:07:49 +0100 > Zouze Eater wrote: > > > Hi Team, > > > > is there a way to identify the original submitter of a package > > integrated to debian package list ? > > Note: Personally, I have no interest in this package specifically and I > will not get involved in reintroducing it. I'm only pointing you at the > information that exists. It is up to you to work out how to proceed, if > at all. I am not willing to respond to further questions on this > package. > > The information you requested is on the page you provided - the link at > tracker.debian.org. > > The first submission of the package was: > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/215922/accepted-tacacs-40419-4-source-all-amd64/ > > Contact information for the person who made that upload is in that > file. Whether that person is still active is no longer a concern for > Debian because the package has been removed. As a volunteer, that > person may or may not respond to your questions, there is no > obligation. From the orphaning bug report > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838701), it would > seem that he is no longer active, at least as far as this code is > concerned. > > Also on the tracker page is a link to the last available copyright > information for the package, under "versioned links" > https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/t/tacacs%2B/copyright-4.0.4.27a-3 > which includes information on the original download location. > > The VCS for the package has now been deleted, the package was never > migrated from an old service (alioth) to the new (salsa), so the old > VCS link is a 404. (The migration would have needed the maintainer to > be active but the package had already been removed.) > > The package will need substantial work to be brought up to date to > include all the required changes since the last upload by the > maintainer. > > See > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1062601/removed-40427a-3-from-unstable/ > for the reasons for removal. The largest problem is going to be that > the package needs Python2 - the code would have to be ported to Python3 > before anything else happens. > > See https://mentors.debian.net/ for some idea on how you can get that > work done. (It seems unlikely that anyone else cares.) > > > In fact i'm from a big company that used a forked version of tac_plus > > daemon ( https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tacacs%2B ) for 15 years, and > > would like to give back our internal developments contributons to the > > open source community. > > > > But first, we have to identify the "nearest" open source version > > available version in terms of code base. > > > > Is it a fixed version of a "shruberry" version ? > > https://shrubbery.net/tac_plus/ is still shown as the homepage and > download location if that's what you mean. That page doesn't seem to > have been updated since 2014, which matches the last year of the last > maintainer upload to Debian. > > It may be best simply to push your code to a public git repository > (like github) and let people find it, if they want it. > > -- > Neil Williams > li...@codehelp.co.uk > https://linux.codehelp.co.uk >
Processed: Re: Bug#1024209: genparse: Fix ftbfs: Use "std=c++14" flag to build
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1024209 Bug #1024209 [src:genparse] genparse: Fix ftbfs: Use "std=c++14" flag to build Marked Bug as done > tags 984149 + patch Bug #984149 [src:genparse] genparse: ftbfs with GCC-11 Added tag(s) patch. > user debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-ri...@lists.debian.org (was nekorou...@outlook.com). > usertags 1024209 - riscv64 Usertags were: riscv64. There are now no usertags set. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1024209: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024209 984149: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984149 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1023316: marked as done (9base: re-adds /bin/rc to /etc/shells on upgrade)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2022 16:34:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023316: fixed in 9base 1:6-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023316,
regarding 9base: re-adds /bin/rc to /etc/shells on upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1023316: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023316
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: 9base
Version: 1:6-12
Tags: patch
Severity: serious
Justification: Debian policy 10.7.3
If I remove /bin/rc from /etc/shells and then upgrade or reinstall
9base, it will re-add itself to /etc/shells. Such behaviour violates
Debian policy section 10.7.3. I propose moving to dpkg triggers and
update-shells to fix this issue and attach a patch for your convenience.
Helmut
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/changelog 9base-6/debian/changelog
--- 9base-6/debian/changelog2022-03-17 21:15:01.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/changelog2022-11-02 09:45:01.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+9base (1:6-13) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Update /etc/shells via dpkg triggers. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:45:01 +0100
+
9base (1:6-12) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/control 9base-6/debian/control
--- 9base-6/debian/control 2022-03-17 21:15:01.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/control 2022-11-02 09:45:01.0 +0100
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Package: 9base
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, debianutils (>= 5.3-1~)
Description: Plan 9 userland tools
9base is a port of following original Plan 9 userland tools to Unix:
ascii, awk, basename, bc, cal, cat, cleanname, cmp, date, dc, dd, diff, du,
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/postinst 9base-6/debian/postinst
--- 9base-6/debian/postinst 2022-03-17 21:15:01.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/postinst 2022-11-02 09:45:01.0 +0100
@@ -5,10 +5,6 @@
# and so we can maintain compatibility with rc scripts expecting /bin/rc
update-alternatives --install /bin/rc rc /usr/lib/plan9/bin/rc 20
-# allow use of 9base' rc as a login shell:
-add-shell /bin/rc
-add-shell /usr/lib/plan9/bin/rc
-
#DEBHELPER#
exit 0
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/postrm 9base-6/debian/postrm
--- 9base-6/debian/postrm 2022-03-17 21:15:01.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/postrm 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-set -e
-
-if [ "$1" = "remove" ]; then
-remove-shell /bin/rc
-remove-shell /usr/lib/plan9/bin/rc
-fi
-
-#DEBHELPER#
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/rules 9base-6/debian/rules
--- 9base-6/debian/rules2022-03-17 21:15:01.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/rules2022-11-02 09:45:01.0 +0100
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
mv $$MANPAGE $${MANPAGE}$(MANEXT); \
done
+ install -D -m644 debian/shells
$(PKGDIR)$(DATADIR)/debianutils/shells.d/plan9
+
override_dh_fixperms:
dh_fixperms
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/shells 9base-6/debian/shells
--- 9base-6/debian/shells 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/shells 2022-11-02 09:45:01.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+/bin/rc
+/usr/lib/plan9/bin/rc
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: 9base
Source-Version: 1:6-13
Done: Bo YU
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
9base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 1023...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bo YU (supplier of updated 9base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 21:48:16 +0800
Source: 9base
Architecture: source
Version: 1:6-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Bo YU
Closes: 1023316
Changes:
9base (1:6-13) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* Update /etc/shells via dpkg triggers. Thanks Helmut Grohne
(closes: #1023316)
Checksums-Sha1:
3507e141513ca8900b657ec1e15ff6b79cf9a
Re: Identify original submitter of tac_plus package
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:07:49 +0100 Zouze Eater wrote: > Hi Team, > > is there a way to identify the original submitter of a package > integrated to debian package list ? Note: Personally, I have no interest in this package specifically and I will not get involved in reintroducing it. I'm only pointing you at the information that exists. It is up to you to work out how to proceed, if at all. I am not willing to respond to further questions on this package. The information you requested is on the page you provided - the link at tracker.debian.org. The first submission of the package was: https://tracker.debian.org/news/215922/accepted-tacacs-40419-4-source-all-amd64/ Contact information for the person who made that upload is in that file. Whether that person is still active is no longer a concern for Debian because the package has been removed. As a volunteer, that person may or may not respond to your questions, there is no obligation. From the orphaning bug report (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838701), it would seem that he is no longer active, at least as far as this code is concerned. Also on the tracker page is a link to the last available copyright information for the package, under "versioned links" https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/t/tacacs%2B/copyright-4.0.4.27a-3 which includes information on the original download location. The VCS for the package has now been deleted, the package was never migrated from an old service (alioth) to the new (salsa), so the old VCS link is a 404. (The migration would have needed the maintainer to be active but the package had already been removed.) The package will need substantial work to be brought up to date to include all the required changes since the last upload by the maintainer. See https://tracker.debian.org/news/1062601/removed-40427a-3-from-unstable/ for the reasons for removal. The largest problem is going to be that the package needs Python2 - the code would have to be ported to Python3 before anything else happens. See https://mentors.debian.net/ for some idea on how you can get that work done. (It seems unlikely that anyone else cares.) > In fact i'm from a big company that used a forked version of tac_plus > daemon ( https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tacacs%2B ) for 15 years, and > would like to give back our internal developments contributons to the > open source community. > > But first, we have to identify the "nearest" open source version > available version in terms of code base. > > Is it a fixed version of a "shruberry" version ? https://shrubbery.net/tac_plus/ is still shown as the homepage and download location if that's what you mean. That page doesn't seem to have been updated since 2014, which matches the last year of the last maintainer upload to Debian. It may be best simply to push your code to a public git repository (like github) and let people find it, if they want it. -- Neil Williams li...@codehelp.co.uk https://linux.codehelp.co.uk pgpmiewqwsPoC.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1023316: 9base: re-adds /bin/rc to /etc/shells on upgrade
Source: 9base
Version: 1:6-12
Tags: patch
Severity: serious
Justification: Debian policy 10.7.3
If I remove /bin/rc from /etc/shells and then upgrade or reinstall
9base, it will re-add itself to /etc/shells. Such behaviour violates
Debian policy section 10.7.3. I propose moving to dpkg triggers and
update-shells to fix this issue and attach a patch for your convenience.
Helmut
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/changelog 9base-6/debian/changelog
--- 9base-6/debian/changelog2022-03-17 21:15:01.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/changelog2022-11-02 09:45:01.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+9base (1:6-13) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Update /etc/shells via dpkg triggers. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:45:01 +0100
+
9base (1:6-12) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/control 9base-6/debian/control
--- 9base-6/debian/control 2022-03-17 21:15:01.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/control 2022-11-02 09:45:01.0 +0100
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Package: 9base
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, debianutils (>= 5.3-1~)
Description: Plan 9 userland tools
9base is a port of following original Plan 9 userland tools to Unix:
ascii, awk, basename, bc, cal, cat, cleanname, cmp, date, dc, dd, diff, du,
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/postinst 9base-6/debian/postinst
--- 9base-6/debian/postinst 2022-03-17 21:15:01.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/postinst 2022-11-02 09:45:01.0 +0100
@@ -5,10 +5,6 @@
# and so we can maintain compatibility with rc scripts expecting /bin/rc
update-alternatives --install /bin/rc rc /usr/lib/plan9/bin/rc 20
-# allow use of 9base' rc as a login shell:
-add-shell /bin/rc
-add-shell /usr/lib/plan9/bin/rc
-
#DEBHELPER#
exit 0
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/postrm 9base-6/debian/postrm
--- 9base-6/debian/postrm 2022-03-17 21:15:01.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/postrm 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-set -e
-
-if [ "$1" = "remove" ]; then
-remove-shell /bin/rc
-remove-shell /usr/lib/plan9/bin/rc
-fi
-
-#DEBHELPER#
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/rules 9base-6/debian/rules
--- 9base-6/debian/rules2022-03-17 21:15:01.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/rules2022-11-02 09:45:01.0 +0100
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
mv $$MANPAGE $${MANPAGE}$(MANEXT); \
done
+ install -D -m644 debian/shells
$(PKGDIR)$(DATADIR)/debianutils/shells.d/plan9
+
override_dh_fixperms:
dh_fixperms
diff --minimal -Nru 9base-6/debian/shells 9base-6/debian/shells
--- 9base-6/debian/shells 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ 9base-6/debian/shells 2022-11-02 09:45:01.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+/bin/rc
+/usr/lib/plan9/bin/rc
Processed: Re: dropwatch build times out in the testsuite
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #964540 [src:dropwatch] dropwatch build times out in the testsuite Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -- 964540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964540 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1019353: transition: perl 5.36
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #1019353 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.36 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > block -1 with 1021324 Bug #1019353 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.36 1019353 was blocked by: 1016761 1019353 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1019353: 1021324 -- 1019353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019353 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1015864: gr-radar: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 doxygen 1.9.4-1 Bug #1015864 [gr-radar] gr-radar: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4 Bug reassigned from package 'gr-radar' to 'doxygen'. No longer marked as found in versions gr-radar/0.0.0.20180308-6. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1015864 to the same values previously set Bug #1015864 [doxygen] gr-radar: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4 Marked as found in versions doxygen/1.9.4-1. > reassign 1015865 doxygen 1.9.4-1 Bug #1015865 [liblog4c3] liblog4c3: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4 Bug reassigned from package 'liblog4c3' to 'doxygen'. No longer marked as found in versions log4c/1.2.4-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1015865 to the same values previously set Bug #1015865 [doxygen] liblog4c3: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4 Marked as found in versions doxygen/1.9.4-1. > forcemerge -1 1015865 Bug #1015864 [doxygen] gr-radar: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4 Bug #1015865 [doxygen] liblog4c3: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4 Merged 1015864 1015865 > retitle -1 doxygen creates broken Makefiles Bug #1015864 [doxygen] gr-radar: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4 Bug #1015865 [doxygen] liblog4c3: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4 Changed Bug title to 'doxygen creates broken Makefiles' from 'gr-radar: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4'. Changed Bug title to 'doxygen creates broken Makefiles' from 'liblog4c3: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4'. > affects -1 src:gr-radar src:log4c Bug #1015864 [doxygen] doxygen creates broken Makefiles Bug #1015865 [doxygen] doxygen creates broken Makefiles Added indication that 1015864 affects src:gr-radar and src:log4c Added indication that 1015865 affects src:gr-radar and src:log4c > forwarded -1 https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/pull/9475 Bug #1015864 [doxygen] doxygen creates broken Makefiles Bug #1015865 [doxygen] doxygen creates broken Makefiles Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/pull/9475'. Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/pull/9475'. -- 1015864: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015864 1015865: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015865 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: gthumb-dev: gthumb-3.11.pc refers to non-existant header folder /usr/include/gthumb-3.11
Processing control commands: > fixed 1008610 3:3.12.2-1 Bug #1008610 [gthumb-dev] gthumb-dev: gthumb-3.11.pc refers to non-existant header folder /usr/include/gthumb-3.11 Marked as fixed in versions gthumb/3:3.12.2-1. -- 1008610: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008610 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: gatling: FTBFS: cdefs.h:297:60: error: macro "__has_attribute" requires an identifier
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libowfat-dev 0.30-4 Bug #1017157 [src:gatling] gatling: FTBFS: cdefs.h:297:60: error: macro "__has_attribute" requires an identifier Bug #1017316 [src:gatling] gatling: FTBFS: cdefs.h:297:60: error: macro "__has_attribute" requires an identifier Bug reassigned from package 'src:gatling' to 'libowfat-dev'. Bug reassigned from package 'src:gatling' to 'libowfat-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions gatling/0.13-6.1. No longer marked as found in versions gatling/0.13-6.1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1017157 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1017316 to the same values previously set Bug #1017157 [libowfat-dev] gatling: FTBFS: cdefs.h:297:60: error: macro "__has_attribute" requires an identifier Bug #1017316 [libowfat-dev] gatling: FTBFS: cdefs.h:297:60: error: macro "__has_attribute" requires an identifier Marked as found in versions libowfat/0.30-4. Marked as found in versions libowfat/0.30-4. > retitle -1 libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34 Bug #1017157 [libowfat-dev] gatling: FTBFS: cdefs.h:297:60: error: macro "__has_attribute" requires an identifier Bug #1017316 [libowfat-dev] gatling: FTBFS: cdefs.h:297:60: error: macro "__has_attribute" requires an identifier Changed Bug title to 'libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34' from 'gatling: FTBFS: cdefs.h:297:60: error: macro "__has_attribute" requires an identifier'. Changed Bug title to 'libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34' from 'gatling: FTBFS: cdefs.h:297:60: error: macro "__has_attribute" requires an identifier'. > affects -1 src:gatling Bug #1017157 [libowfat-dev] libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34 Bug #1017316 [libowfat-dev] libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34 Added indication that 1017157 affects src:gatling Added indication that 1017316 affects src:gatling -- 1017157: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017157 1017316: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017316 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: nautilus-image-converter: Incompatible with Nautilus 43
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1017449
Bug #1017449 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:nautilus-image-converter] nautilus-image-converter: Incompatible with
Nautilus 43
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 0.3.1~git20110416-2+rm.
> tags 1017449 +pending
Bug #1017449 [src:nautilus-image-converter] nautilus-image-converter:
Incompatible with Nautilus 43
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1017449: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017449
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: Please resume nautilus-image-converter to testing/sid repos
On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 14:05:29 -1000 "W. Wayne Liauh" wrote: > We have been heavy users of nautilus-image-converter for many years. > This is one of the best features of nautilus. Please add it back to > the testing/sid repositories. Thanks a whole lot. Please see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017448 RM: nautilus-image-converter -- RoQA; unmaintained, doesn't work with nautilus 43 """ nautilus-image-converter was orphaned years ago. [1] The upstream project has been archived so is no longer receiving bug reports or fixes. [2] Nautilus 43 is a major change to the extension API. It would require someone to convert nautilus-image-converter to GTK4. """ Therefore, please remove nautilus-image-converter from Debian. So nautilus-image-converter is not likely to be added back to testing or sid, the problem lies with the upstream code, not the Debian packaging. -- Neil Williams li...@codehelp.co.uk https://linux.codehelp.co.uk pgpBeFv4p_JCz.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: pius: NameError: name 'util' is not defined
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 989031 fixed-upstream Bug #989031 [pius] pius: NameError: name 'util' is not defined Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 989031: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989031 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1017001: ${python3:Depends} not expanded in Recommends line
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - unreproducible Bug #101700 [nvi] U undo fails on multiple Joined lines Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #101700 to the same tags previously set -- 101700: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=101700 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#982459: mdadm examine corrupts host ext4
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:linux Bug #982459 [mdadm] mdadm --examine in chroot without /proc,/dev,/sys mounted corrupts host's filesystem Bug reassigned from package 'mdadm' to 'src:linux'. No longer marked as found in versions mdadm/4.1-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #982459 to the same values previously set -- 982459: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982459 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: qtav: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0
Heads up for those following this bug: qtav appears to be unmaintained upstream. My only interest in the package was to enable video playback in digikam. Digikam upstream has taken most of the qtav code, incorporated into digikam source tree and fixed it up. The next release of digikam will not need qtav and therefore I will no longer be maintaining qtav. The only other usage in Debian I can find is "matrix-mirage" (which is itself orphaned). My suggestion is to simply remove qtav from Debian. If you do need qtav for some other purpose, please respond here and consider yourself the new maintainer. Best, -Steve signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: Re: ldap2dns: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1)
Processing control commands: > tags 437301 patch Bug #437301 [ldap2dns] ldap2dns: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1) Added tag(s) patch. -- 437301: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437301 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#997040: xpaint: segfault on exit
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + upstream Bug #997040 [xpaint] xpaint: segfault on exit Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/sf-xpaint/bugs/17/ Bug #997040 [xpaint] xpaint: segfault on exit Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceforge.net/p/sf-xpaint/bugs/17/'. -- 997040: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997040 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1014244: dhelp: Cron weekly gives email with /etc/cron.weekly/dhelp: error
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 swish++ Bug #1014244 [dhelp] dhelp: Cron weekly gives email with /etc/cron.weekly/dhelp: error Bug reassigned from package 'dhelp' to 'swish++'. No longer marked as found in versions dhelp/0.6.28. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1014244 to the same values previously set > forcemerge 803342 -1 Bug #803342 [swish++] dhelp: Weekly cron job terminates, doesn't create 'documents.index' Bug #803343 [swish++] dhelp_parse -i terminates, no 'documents.index' created Bug #803343 [swish++] dhelp_parse -i terminates, no 'documents.index' created Marked as found in versions swish++/6.1.5-4. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #803342 to the same values previously set Bug #1014244 [swish++] dhelp: Cron weekly gives email with /etc/cron.weekly/dhelp: error Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' Added indication that 1014244 affects dhelp Marked as found in versions swish++/6.1.5-4 and swish++/6.1.5-2.2. Added tag(s) patch. Merged 803342 803343 1014244 -- 1014244: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014244 803342: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803342 803343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803343 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
RE: Cybersecurity software users info
Hi, I trust that you have had an opportunity to read my previous email. Let me know the Job titles/Geography you wish to target. Looking forward to hearing from you. Regards Eva From: Eva Allen [mailto:eva.al...@zoominfos.net] Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 2:57 AM To: 'packa...@qa.debian.org' Subject: Cybersecurity software users info Hi, Do have requirement of leads from cyber security software users? We will provide contacts of Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, Cisco, Crowdstrike, IBM, OneTrust, Okta, Zscaler users and many more. We will provide a customized list with data attributes such as Company Name, Name, Verified Email Address, Phone Number, Website URL, Mailing Address, City, State, Zip, Country, Industry Specification (SIC), and LinkedIn URL. Kindly let me know if you have any essentials at this point in time and we are doing business on the safer side, mentioning policy terms & conditions on the insertion order. Awaiting your response. Regards, Eva Allen IT Marketing Manager If you don't wish to receive this email, revert back with "Withdraw".
Processed: Re: razor 2.85 is really 2.84
Processing control commands: > submitter -1 m...@msquadrat.de Bug #1013329 [src:razor] razor 2.85 is really 2.84 Changed Bug submitter to 'm...@msquadrat.de' from 'Vagrant Cascadian '. -- 1013329: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013329 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#789694: schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386
Processing control commands: > tags 789694 moreinfo Bug #789694 [schroot] schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 789694: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789694 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#993957: closed by Christoph Biedl (Re: Bug#993957: (no subject))
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 12:16 PM Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > #993957: schroot: fails with non-existent subdirectory > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Christoph Biedl > by > replying to this email. christoph has misunderstood that i have provided the repro circumstances: sysvinit is required to be installed and utilised before this bug will occur. with sysvinit being a supported debian boot mechanism the closure of this bugreport is not the correct action to take. this bug is not unreproducible: the declaration that it is unreproducible is invalid. l.
Processed: Re: Bug#857018: schroot: Setup script not running, --session-name not working
Processing control commands: > tags 857018 moreinfo Bug #857018 [schroot] schroot: Setup script not running, --session-name not working Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 857018: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857018 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#993957: (no subject)
Processing control commands: > tags 993957 moreinfo Bug #993957 [schroot] schroot: fails with non-existent subdirectory Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 993957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993957 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: gaffitter is marked for autoremoval from testing
On Thu, 26 May 2022 13:01:23 -0300 "Douglas A. Augusto" wrote: > On 2022-05-26 at 04:51, > Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote: > > > gaffitter 0.6.0-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on > > 2022-06-30 > > > > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: > > 1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, > > CVE-2022-28183, CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, > > CVE-2022-28192 https://bugs.debian.org/1011146 The report is in error due to bug https://bugs.debian.org/1011268 in the script generating the marks. The bug is causing lots of other erroneous autoremoval marks too. > Hi, I'm the author of the gaffitter package. I received the message > above but I don't know why gaffitter should depend on > nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470; it definitely shouldn't. By the > way, there is a newer gaffitter version available (1.0.0). > > What can I do to prevent gaffitter from being removed from testing? You do not need to do anything. > > > Best, > > -- > Douglas A. Augusto -- Neil Williams = https://linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpixJZri3NMS.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: gfxboot: reproducible builds: Embeds user id, group id and timestamps in cpio files
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 978946
Bug #978946 {Done: Vagrant Cascadian }
[src:gfxboot] gfxboot: reproducible builds: Embeds user id, group id and
timestamps in cpio files
Unarchived Bug 978946
> reopen 978946
Bug #978946 {Done: Vagrant Cascadian }
[src:gfxboot] gfxboot: reproducible builds: Embeds user id, group id and
timestamps in cpio files
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions gfxboot/4.5.73-1 and gfxboot/4.5.73-2.
> found 978946 4.5.73-2
Bug #978946 [src:gfxboot] gfxboot: reproducible builds: Embeds user id, group
id and timestamps in cpio files
Marked as found in versions gfxboot/4.5.73-2.
> forwarded 978946 https://github.com/openSUSE/gfxboot/pull/35
Bug #978946 [src:gfxboot] gfxboot: reproducible builds: Embeds user id, group
id and timestamps in cpio files
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/openSUSE/gfxboot/pull/35' from
'https://github.com/openSUSE/gfxboot/pull/49'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
978946: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978946
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: gaffitter is marked for autoremoval from testing
On 2022-05-26 at 04:51, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote: > gaffitter 0.6.0-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30 > > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: > 1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183, > CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, CVE-2022-28192 > https://bugs.debian.org/1011146 Hi, I'm the author of the gaffitter package. I received the message above but I don't know why gaffitter should depend on nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470; it definitely shouldn't. By the way, there is a newer gaffitter version available (1.0.0). What can I do to prevent gaffitter from being removed from testing? Best, -- Douglas A. Augusto signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#997434: xpaint: FTBFS: -q: invalid option -- '.'
Processing control commands:
> notfound 997434 2.9.1.4-4
Bug #997434 {Done: Vagrant Cascadian } [src:xpaint] xpaint:
FTBFS: -q: invalid option -- '.'
No longer marked as found in versions xpaint/2.9.1.4-4.
--
997434: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997434
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: python-svg.path: autopkgtest regression
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +confirmed Bug #1010819 [src:python-svg.path] python-svg.path: autopkgtest regression Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://github.com/regebro/svg.path/issues/86 Bug #1010819 [src:python-svg.path] python-svg.path: autopkgtest regression Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/regebro/svg.path/issues/86'. -- 1010819: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010819 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1009403: pmacct: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (libnetfilter_log >= 1) were not met
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libnetfilter-log-dev 1.0.2-2 Bug #1009403 [src:pmacct] pmacct: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (libnetfilter_log >= 1) were not met Bug reassigned from package 'src:pmacct' to 'libnetfilter-log-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions pmacct/1.7.6-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1009403 to the same values previously set Bug #1009403 [libnetfilter-log-dev] pmacct: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (libnetfilter_log >= 1) were not met Marked as found in versions libnetfilter-log/1.0.2-2. > retitle -1 libnetfilter-log-dev lost required dependencies on > libnfnetlink-dev and libmnl-dev Bug #1009403 [libnetfilter-log-dev] pmacct: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (libnetfilter_log >= 1) were not met Changed Bug title to 'libnetfilter-log-dev lost required dependencies on libnfnetlink-dev and libmnl-dev' from 'pmacct: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (libnetfilter_log >= 1) were not met'. > affects -1 src:pmacct Bug #1009403 [libnetfilter-log-dev] libnetfilter-log-dev lost required dependencies on libnfnetlink-dev and libmnl-dev Added indication that 1009403 affects src:pmacct -- 1009403: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009403 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#995462: bbrun: fails to build on RISC-V
Processing control commands: > tags 995462 +moreinfo Bug #995462 [bbrun] bbrun: fails to build on RISC-V Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 995462: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995462 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Cannot install without wiping other packages
Processing control commands: > tags 966223 +unreproducible Bug #966223 [unar] Cannot install without wiping other packages Added tag(s) unreproducible. > notfound 966223 1.10.1-2 Bug #966223 [unar] Cannot install without wiping other packages No longer marked as found in versions unar/1.10.1-2. > close 966223 Bug #966223 [unar] Cannot install without wiping other packages Marked Bug as done -- 966223: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966223 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: w3c-sgml-lib: catalogs for MathML 2.0 are incomplete
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #1003933 [w3c-sgml-lib] w3c-sgml-lib: catalogs for MathML 2.0 are incomplete Added tag(s) patch. -- 1003933: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003933 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: manpages/synop.xsl makes a mess of long function names
Processing control commands: > affects -1 - src:linux Bug #569828 [docbook-xsl] manpages/synop.xsl makes a mess of long function names Removed indication that 569828 affects src:linux -- 569828: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569828 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: pktstat FTBFS: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #995624 [src:pktstat] pktstat FTBFS: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #995624 to the same tags previously set -- 995624: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995624 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: libnfsidmap_0.25-6+b1_mips64el-buildd.changes REJECTED
Processing control commands: > tag -1 sid bookworm Bug #1007750 [src:libnfsidmap] libnfsidmap_0.25-6+b1_mips64el-buildd.changes REJECTED Added tag(s) bookworm and sid. > retitle -1 src:libnfsidmap: libnfsidmap-dev is also built by src:nfs-utils Bug #1007750 [src:libnfsidmap] libnfsidmap_0.25-6+b1_mips64el-buildd.changes REJECTED Changed Bug title to 'src:libnfsidmap: libnfsidmap-dev is also built by src:nfs-utils' from 'libnfsidmap_0.25-6+b1_mips64el-buildd.changes REJECTED'. -- 1007750: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007750 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1006038: git-remote-hg: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test returned exit code 2
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-hg/issues/48 Bug #1006038 [src:git-remote-hg] git-remote-hg: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test returned exit code 2 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-hg/issues/48'. -- 1006038: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006038 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1005970
Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1005970 [ssmtp] [PATCH] System userid display in 1st Recevied header Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > retitle -1 [PATCH] System userid display in received header Bug #1005970 [ssmtp] [PATCH] System userid display in 1st Recevied header Changed Bug title to '[PATCH] System userid display in received header' from '[PATCH] System userid display in 1st Recevied header'. -- 1005970: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005970 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: [memtest86] Stable hangs just after starting
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 5.31b+dfsg-1 Bug #1004565 [memtest86+, memtest86] [memtest86] Stable hangs just after starting There is no source info for the package 'memtest86' at version '5.31b+dfsg-1' with architecture '' Marked as fixed in versions memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-1. -- 1004565: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004565 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1002527: postinst ignores USER from /etc/default/milter-greylist when invoking chown ... /var/lib/milter-greylist
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1002527 milter-greylist -u user does not correctly ensure user can > update greylist.db Bug #1002527 [milter-greylist] postinst ignores USER from /etc/default/milter-greylist when invoking chown ... /var/lib/milter-greylist Changed Bug title to 'milter-greylist -u user does not correctly ensure user can update greylist.db' from 'postinst ignores USER from /etc/default/milter-greylist when invoking chown ... /var/lib/milter-greylist'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1002527: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002527 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: memtest86+.iso does not boot from USB
Processing control commands: > found -1 5.01-3 Bug #1004126 [memtest86+] memtest86+.iso does not boot from USB Marked as found in versions memtest86+/5.01-3. -- 1004126: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004126 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: memtest86+: buffer overflow in DMI data parsing, crash when displaying DMI memory info on larger PCs
Processing control commands: > found -1 5.01-3 Bug #1003906 [memtest86+] memtest86+: buffer overflow in DMI data parsing, crash when displaying DMI memory info on larger PCs Marked as found in versions memtest86+/5.01-3. -- 1003906: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003906 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: RFS: kic/2.4c-1 [QA] [RC] -- Enhanced KIC layout editor
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1003464 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: kic/2.4c-1 [QA] [RC] -- Enhanced KIC layout editor Added tag(s) pending. > tag 688189 pending Bug #688189 [kic] kic: newer upstream release Added tag(s) pending. > tag 999088 pending Bug #999088 [src:kic] kic: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Added tag(s) pending. -- 1003464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003464 688189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688189 999088: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999088 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: cflow: wierd Info node with emacs
Processing control commands: > tags 931113 confirmed fixed-upstream patch pending upstream Bug #931113 [cflow] cflow: wierd Info node with emacs Added tag(s) upstream, patch, pending, confirmed, and fixed-upstream. -- 931113: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931113 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#999323: libapache-mod-encoding: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Processing control commands: > tags 999323 pending Bug #999323 [src:libapache-mod-encoding] libapache-mod-encoding: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Added tag(s) pending. -- 999323: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999323 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: libapache2-mod-encoding: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Processing control commands: > tags 999264 pending Bug #999264 [src:libapache2-mod-encoding] libapache2-mod-encoding: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Added tag(s) pending. -- 999264: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999264 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: Bug#1001720: Cache directory not populated, directory omissions
Control: reassign -1 libapache2-mod-musicindex 1.4.1-3.1 On Ma, 14 dec 21, 20:20:50, Dominique Brazziel wrote: > Package: libapache2-mod-musicindexVersion: 1.4.1-3.1Severity: > importantX-Debbugs-Cc: dbrazz...@snet.net > Dear Maintainer, > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** > * What led up to the situation?Run apache2 with mod-musicindex configured > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)?Deleted and redefined cache directory * What was the outcome > of this action?Cache directory is empty after browsing and playing audio > files.Some of the subdirectories are missing from the genre displays(i.e. the > 'Yes' subdirectory does not show up though it existsunder the 'Rock' genre. > * What outcome did you expect instead?Display of all music directories and > populated cache directory. > *** End of the template - remove these template lines *** > > -- System Information:Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing APT > policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, > 'unstable')Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Kernel: Linux 5.15.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)Kernel taint flags: > TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULELocale: > LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set > to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not setShell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dashInit: > systemd (via /run/systemd/system)LSM: AppArmor: enabled > Versions of packages libapache2-mod-musicindex depends on:ii apache2-bin > [apache2-api-20120211] 2.4.51-2ii libapr1 > 1.7.0-8ii libarchive13 3.4.3-2+b1ii libc6 > 2.32-5ii libflac8 1.3.3-2ii > libid3tag0 0.15.1b-14ii libmad0 > 0.15.1b-10ii libmariadb3 1:10.5.12-1ii > libvorbis0a 1.3.7-1ii libvorbisfile3 > 1.3.7-1ii mod-musicindex-common > 1.4.1-3.1libapache2-mod-musicindex recommends no packages. > libapache2-mod-musicindex suggests no packages. > -- no debconf information > Reassigning to correct package (due to mangled line breaks). Kind regards, Andrei -- Looking after bugs assigned to unknown or inexistent packages signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#996154: obexftp: FTBFS: ld: final link failed: bad value
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libopenobex2-dev 1.7.2-2 Bug #996154 [src:obexftp] obexftp: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ld: final link failed: bad value Bug reassigned from package 'src:obexftp' to 'libopenobex2-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions obexftp/0.24-6. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #996154 to the same values previously set Bug #996154 [libopenobex2-dev] obexftp: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ld: final link failed: bad value Marked as found in versions libopenobex/1.7.2-2. > retitle -1 libopenobex2-dev: openobex-target-release.cmake forces static > linking Bug #996154 [libopenobex2-dev] obexftp: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ld: final link failed: bad value Changed Bug title to 'libopenobex2-dev: openobex-target-release.cmake forces static linking' from 'obexftp: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ld: final link failed: bad value'. > affects -1 src:obexftp Bug #996154 [libopenobex2-dev] libopenobex2-dev: openobex-target-release.cmake forces static linking Added indication that 996154 affects src:obexftp > tags -1 patch Bug #996154 [libopenobex2-dev] libopenobex2-dev: openobex-target-release.cmake forces static linking Added tag(s) patch. -- 996154: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996154 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: gnubiff: ftbfs with GCC-11
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #984159 [src:gnubiff] gnubiff: ftbfs with GCC-11 Added tag(s) patch. -- 984159: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984159 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: dnsproxy listen unnecessary UDP port
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/awaw/dnsproxy/issues/6 Bug #1000159 [dnsproxy] dnsproxy listen unnecessary UDP port Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/awaw/dnsproxy/issues/6' from 'https://github.com/awaw/dnsproxy/issues/1'. -- 1000159: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000159 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1000238: Fwd: Re: dnsproxy: Packaging licensing incompatible with upstream
Also forward my previous email to public Debian BTS: see below. Thanks, Boyuan Yang 在 2021-11-19星期五的 22:09 -0500，Boyuan Yang写道： > Hi, > > 在 2021-11-19星期五的 23:02 -0300，Marcos Talau写道： > > Package: dnsproxy > > Version: 1.17-1 > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: mar...@talau.info > > > > The current packaging licensing (GPL-2) is incompatible with upstream > > licensing (MIT). It is a hampering condition to submit patches from > > Debian to upstream. > > > > I am adopting the package and I intend to change the packaging licensing > > to MIT. > > > > I will wait 15 days to know if anyone has any objections. > > No problem from my side. Please consider all my previous QA work to be > released under a permissive license. Canonically: > > I hereby release all my previous contribution to dnsproxy packaging in > Debian > (debian/ dir from dnsproxy/1.16-1, dnsproxy/1.17-1, and git commit a735bbf0, > 9ae0769c, de379f25, cd237bd6, 29d56e4e, 9ae2292f, and 44f63635 > under https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dnsproxy ) into the Public Domain. In > case where this is not possible, I release all aforementioned contribution > under CC0-1.0 license ( > https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode ). > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#993678: Fails to produce PDF output when using scale.by.width - produces broken lstlisting/lstcode options
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #993678 [dblatex] Fails to produce PDF output when using scale.by.width - produces broken lstlisting/lstcode options Added tag(s) patch. -- 993678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993678 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#993678: Fails to produce PDF output when using scale.by.width - produces broken lstlisting/lstcode options
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/dblatex/bugs/129/ Bug #993678 [dblatex] Fails to produce PDF output when using scale.by.width - produces broken lstlisting/lstcode options Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceforge.net/p/dblatex/bugs/129/'. -- 993678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993678 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: extension compatibility with GNOME Shell 41
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #996077 [gnome-shell-mailnag] gnome-shell-mailnag: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 41 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 996077: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996077 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: libloki: ftbfs with GCC-11
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #984186 [src:libloki] libloki: ftbfs with GCC-11 Added tag(s) patch. -- 984186: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984186 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: lasi: ftbfs with GCC-11
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #984083 [src:lasi] lasi: ftbfs with GCC-11 Added tag(s) patch. -- 984083: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984083 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#995624: pktstat FTBFS: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #995624 [src:pktstat] pktstat FTBFS: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] Added tag(s) patch. -- 995624: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995624 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: tcm: FTBFS on non-linux archs
Processing control commands: > tag -1 help Bug #696824 [tcm] tcm: FTBFS on non-linux archs Added tag(s) help. -- 696824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696824 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
RE: overmolding injection molding
hello packages, How are you doing? I have visited your website and found that your company may be looking for suppliers of plastic rubber products or aluminum and zinc alloy products, and we are pleased to say that CNM LTD will be your right choice. CNM is a mold manufacturer for nearly 13 years, specializing in plastic injection molds and die-casting molds for automotive, medical, consumer electronics, telecommunications, household appliances, industrial components, and more. 1 in mold decoration process 2 Two Shot Molding 3 dboule color mold 4 Over Mold manufacturers 5 Mold Design and part design, through to mold manufacture. 6 Die Cast-Aluminum & Zinc 7 the tolerance of our technology is within ±0.01mm My Email: Please reply to this mail directly. If you are interested in any plastic parts, please send me drawings or samples and we will give you the best price from one piece. Looking forward to you inquiry! My most kindest regards, CNM-OEM manufacturers
RE: Need Estimation Done?
I don't mean to be a pain but if there is no assistance required for estimation, I can cross this off my list. Thanks From: Eric Rudolph Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 To: packa...@qa.debian.org Subject: Need Estimation Done? Hi, Prism estimation will help you to get fast and reliable construction, and building material estimates that will enable you to win more bids. With the use of the latest software like Plan Swift and Bluebeam, we ensure that our clients receive the most accurate & error-free estimates for their projects. We charge per project and our fee varies along with the scope of work. If you're holding any job then send over the project plans along with the scope of work and get a detailed proposal for the job after reviewing the project plans. If there're any questions or concerns feel free to reach out. Best Regards, Eric Rudolph | Marketing Executive P: (228) 586-9215 | Prism Estimation LLC 1173 Queen St West, M6R 1B3 Toronto, ON
RE: Need Estimation Done?
Haven't heard back from you, I am sure you are busy but would really appreciate if you could spare a second to let me know if this is something you would be interested in. Thanks From: Eric Rudolph Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 To: packa...@qa.debian.org Subject: Need Estimation Done? Hi, Prism estimation will help you to get fast and reliable construction, and building material estimates that will enable you to win more bids. With the use of the latest software like Plan Swift and Bluebeam, we ensure that our clients receive the most accurate & error-free estimates for their projects. We charge per project and our fee varies along with the scope of work. If you're holding any job then send over the project plans along with the scope of work and get a detailed proposal for the job after reviewing the project plans. If there're any questions or concerns feel free to reach out. Best Regards, Eric Rudolph | Marketing Executive P: (228) 586-9215 | Prism Estimation LLC 1173 Queen St West, M6R 1B3 Toronto, ON
RE: Need Estimation Done?
Just a quick follow up on my last email to make sure if you took a look at the benefits of working with us. Feel free to get in touch with any questions. From: Eric Rudolph Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 To: packa...@qa.debian.org Subject: Need Estimation Done? Hi, Prism estimation will help you to get fast and reliable construction, and building material estimates that will enable you to win more bids. With the use of the latest software like Plan Swift and Bluebeam, we ensure that our clients receive the most accurate & error-free estimates for their projects. We charge per project and our fee varies along with the scope of work. If you're holding any job then send over the project plans along with the scope of work and get a detailed proposal for the job after reviewing the project plans. If there're any questions or concerns feel free to reach out. Best Regards, Eric Rudolph | Marketing Executive P: (228) 586-9215 | Prism Estimation LLC 1173 Queen St West, M6R 1B3 Toronto, ON
Processed (with 1 error): Re: autoconf: Please package new version (2.70)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 976892 +sid +booksworm Unknown tag/s: booksworm. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato woody sarge sarge-ignore etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore squeeze squeeze-ignore wheezy wheezy-ignore jessie jessie-ignore stretch stretch-ignore buster buster-ignore bullseye bullseye-ignore bookworm bookworm-ignore trixie trixie-ignore. Bug #976892 [src:autoconf] autoconf: Please package new version (2.70) Added tag(s) sid. Bug #976892 [src:autoconf] autoconf: Please package new version (2.70) Requested to add no tags; doing nothing. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 976892: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976892 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: glusterFS support in debian package tcmu-runner
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:58:35 +0200 Andreas Kirbach wrote: > Dear Sir or Madam, > > I tried to use package tcmu-runner, but noticed that it has explicity > been build without support for GlusterFS. This would have been because the package was introduced to support a specific dependency chain and, at the time, there was no request for Gluster support. I have now orphaned the package on behalf of team+freexian (it no longer has an active maintainer), so the correct thing to do here is simply file a wishlist bug against the package. I've CC'd the QA group mailing list, where orphaned packages are handled, but the list is not the place to request this change. Report a bug against tcmu if you want anything to change. You may also choose to make the change yourself, via a sponsor if needed - https://mentors.debian.net/ & https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tcmu.git Adding this support would be easier with a volunteer available to test that it actually works, so the more you can do yourself, the more likely it is that this orphaned package can be updated. (I certainly have no ready way to test glusterfs support, for example). https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting It would appear that https://packages.debian.org/unstable/libgfapi0 is what is referred to for this support, via https://packages.debian.org/unstable/libglusterfs-dev (I have not tested whether tcmu compiles correctly with the version of libgfapi in Debian.) > As the package description explcitly does mention Gluster I wonder > why this was done as I also couldn't find anything in the changelog? Something like this is unlikely to be specified in the changelog unless there was a bug report to introduce it or remove it. If there was a particular reason not to support an optional part of a package, that could also appear in a README.Debian or README.source in the package. > As GlusterFS is packaged in Debian and supported by various other > packages (like tgt-glusterfs) it would be nice if this was supported > in TCMU-Runner as well. > > Kind regards, > Andreas Kirbach -- Neil Williams = https://linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgplMz0lmddV6.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Can we discuss?
I want to discuss a business with you. I am having your business complementary card. Can we discuss? I am a politician and i don't have time to invest. i am willing to invest $35 Million in area of Investment interest: Oil & Gas, Agriculture, Aviation, Tourism, Retail, Real Estate & Construction, IT & Communications, Engineering, Utilities, Telecoms, Mining, Maritime Sector and Entertainment industries. I will give you 40% of the total funds while i have 60% but to be on a safe side and to be sure you will give to me my 60% of the total funds,we need to sign an agreement document to guarantee my 60% please. can we discuss more? i wait to hear from you. Thanks Qadeer
Processed: Re: opensysusers: uses `eval` on data that is not supposed to be safe to eval
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #992058 [opensysusers] opensysusers: uses `eval` on data that is not supposed to be safe to eval (CVE-2021-40084) Added tag(s) patch. -- 992058: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992058 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: opensysusers: does not create groups implicitly with "m" action
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #986015 [opensysusers] opensysusers: does not create groups implicitly with "m" action Added tag(s) patch. -- 986015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986015 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: transition: GNOME 40 (libmutter-8-0 and friends)
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #993203 [gnome-shell-mailnag] gnome-shell-mailnag: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 993203: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: guesoglc FTBFS: make[2]: *** No rule to make target '../src/glew.c', needed by 'libGLC_la-glew.lo'. Stop.
Control: tags -1 + sid On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 12:14:21 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote: > quesoglc fails to build from source in unstable. This seems to have been caused by the update to autoconf, it does not occur with bookworm and upgrading autoconf to sid causes the issue. Looking at the config.log, the old autoconf seems to do the check twice, which works the first time but fails the second time. The g++ command-line is identical for all three of the checks. The new autoconf seems to only do the check once, which then fails. The failure with the old autoconf is due to missing -DGLEW_MX=1, which is a bug in the patch adding GLEW mx support. The failure with the new autoconf seems to be C++ related, the same test file links successfully when named .c and built with gcc. The difference is that autoconf 2.71 removed this from conftest.cpp: #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" #endif OTOH the library is entirely C not C++ so it should use conftest.c instead of conftest.cpp for detecting the tests. It looks like AX_CHECK_GLU pulls in C++ support, but as far as I can tell it restores the language correctly after modifying it. Moving the AX_CHECK_GLU check after the GLEW check fixes the build. When I delete build/m4/ax_check_glu.m4 and try to use the one from autoconf-archive, the build fails due to a circular dependency: configure.in:157: error: m4_require: circular dependency of AC_LANG_COMPILER(C++) When I then add AC_PROG_CXX before AX_CHECK_GLU then that failure doesn't happen and the build succeeds as conftest.c is used this time. Unfortunately that workaround does not work for the original copy of the AX_CHECK_GLU macro in the upstream tarball. Removing use of AC_PROG_CXX/AC_LANG_PUSH/POP from the original copy of the AX_CHECK_GLU macro in the upstream tarball works around the issue. I have zero idea where to go from here but I'm going to apply that workaround for now and the next upstream release will drop the embedded code and m4 copies so should not be affected by this bug either. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#993743: xdemorse: autopkgtest regression: warning on stderr
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed pending Bug #993743 [src:xdemorse] xdemorse: autopkgtest regression: warning on stderr Added tag(s) confirmed and pending. -- 993743: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993743 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: Bug#978893: ripperx: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 at 14:28:53 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
> autoconf 2.70, but succeeds to build with autoconf 2.69.
...
> The full build log can be found at:
> http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/09/26.ac270/ripperx_2.8.0-2_unstable_ac270.log
> The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.
I don't think those lines indicate the actual error, which looks like a C++
compiler problem (perhaps because the new Autoconf version passes options
that make the compiler more strict?):
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/10/ext/string_conversions.h:41,
> from /usr/include/c++/10/bits/basic_string.h:6535,
> from /usr/include/c++/10/string:55,
> from /usr/include/c++/10/stdexcept:39,
> from err_dialog_handler.h:6,
> from common.h:21,
> from calc_stat.h:3,
> from calc_stat.c:1:
> /usr/include/c++/10/cstdlib:151:11: error: ‘malloc’ has not been declared in
> ‘::’
> 151 | using ::malloc;
> | ^~
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/10/stdlib.h:36,
> from cddbp.c:6:
> /usr/include/c++/10/cstdlib:151:11: error: ‘malloc’ has not been declared in
> ‘::’
> 151 | using ::malloc;
> | ^~
> In file included from cddbp.c:6:
> /usr/include/c++/10/stdlib.h:65:12: error: ‘malloc’ has not been declared in
> ‘std’
>65 | using std::malloc;
> |^~
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/10/stdlib.h:36,
> from cddb.c:6:
> /usr/include/c++/10/cstdlib:151:11: error: ‘malloc’ has not been declared in
> ‘::’
> 151 | using ::malloc;
> | ^~
> In file included from cddb.c:6:
> /usr/include/c++/10/stdlib.h:65:12: error: ‘malloc’ has not been declared in
> ‘std’
>65 | using std::malloc;
> |^~
I tried to reproduce this in sbuild and got a different error:
> checking for strndup... (cached) yes
> checking for strstr... (cached) yes
> checking for openpty... no
> checking for openpty in -lutil... no
> configure: error: Missing required function: openpty
> tail -v -n \+0 config.log
> ==> config.log <==
...
> configure:5959: checking for openpty
> configure:5959: g++ -o conftest -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wl,-z,relro conftest.c >&5
...
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccVfJfLG.o: in function `main':
> ./conftest.c:65: undefined reference to `openpty'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
| #ifdef __cplusplus
| extern "C"
| #endif
| char openpty ();
| /* The GNU C library defines this for functions which it implements
| to always fail with ENOSYS. Some functions are actually named
| something starting with __ and the normal name is an alias. */
| #if defined __stub_openpty || defined __stub___openpty
| choke me
| #endif
|
| int
| main (void)
| {
| return openpty ();
| ;
| return 0;
| }
...
> configure:5964: checking for openpty in -lutil
> configure:5987: g++ -o conftest -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wl,-z,relro conftest.c -lutil >&5
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccvWpbnJ.o: in function `main':
> ./conftest.c:46: undefined reference to `openpty()'
...
| /* Override any GCC internal prototype to avoid an error.
|Use char because int might match the return type of a GCC
|builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */
| char openpty ();
| int
| main (void)
| {
| return openpty ();
| ;
| return 0;
| }
This new error might be an Autoconf bug: the second check (with -lutil)
looks like it's missing an extern "C" on the prototype. If so,
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=autoconf.git;a=commitdiff;h=b27bc3e230bb12fdd9a813e38e82bc4c3e22b4cc
might help.
smcv
Processed: Re: sendfile: weekly cron job should use mktemp instead of tempfile
Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #969409 [sendfile] sendfile: weekly cron job should use mktemp instead of tempfile Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' -- 969409: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969409 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#982626: autoconf: Ships identical NEWS and NEWS.Debian files
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #982626 [autoconf] autoconf: Ships identical NEWS and NEWS.Debian files Added tag(s) patch. -- 982626: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982626 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#993075: libnsl-dev: rpcsvc/nis.h includes no longer available rpc/rpc.h
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 sendmail Bug #993075 [libnsl-dev] libnsl-dev: rpcsvc/nis.h includes no longer available rpc/rpc.h Bug reassigned from package 'libnsl-dev' to 'sendmail'. No longer marked as found in versions libnsl/1.3.0-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #993075 to the same values previously set > retitle -1 sendmail: FTBFS due to RPC removal from glibc Bug #993075 [sendmail] libnsl-dev: rpcsvc/nis.h includes no longer available rpc/rpc.h Changed Bug title to 'sendmail: FTBFS due to RPC removal from glibc' from 'libnsl-dev: rpcsvc/nis.h includes no longer available rpc/rpc.h'. -- 993075: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993075 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#979047: RM: pepperflashplugin-nonfree -- RoQA; No longer work; upstream eol
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #979047 [src:pepperflashplugin-nonfree] RM: pepperflashplugin-nonfree -- RoQA; No longer work; upstream eol Bug reassigned from package 'src:pepperflashplugin-nonfree' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #979047 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #979047 to the same values previously set -- 979047: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979047 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110532 Bug #992981 [autoconf] autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++ Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110532'. -- 992981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992981 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #992981 [autoconf] autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++ Added tag(s) patch. -- 992981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992981 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++
Processing control commands: > tags -1 upstream Bug #992981 [autoconf] autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++ Added tag(s) upstream. -- 992981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992981 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#981522: varmon - ship with bullseye?
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #981522 [src:varmon] varmon - ship with bullseye? Severity set to 'serious' from 'minor' -- 981522: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=981522 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#991331: sendmail: CVE-2021-3618
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 8.16.1-1 Bug #991331 [src:sendmail] sendmail: CVE-2021-3618 Marked as fixed in versions sendmail/8.16.1-1. > tag -1 + help Bug #991331 [src:sendmail] sendmail: CVE-2021-3618 Added tag(s) help. -- 991331: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991331 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
RE: toy making machine price
Hi packages, I will be hoping that this letter finds you and finds you well. This is Caime from CNM Group Limited. Regarding your esteemed corporation, I am writing to see if there is any chance for us to cooperate for mutual benefits. CNM Group Limited specializes in Plastic Injection mould/ molding, such as double-color-mould and over mould etc. Meanwhile, we offer Die Casting moulds & castings, mainly Aluminum Die Casting & Zinc Die Casting. We can offer you: A. Consulting B. Product design and development C. Project engineering D. Project management E. Prototyping F. Plastic, zinc, aluminum and magnesium products solutions G. one stop service from the design phase to bulk production. Should you want more about us, please feel free to contact us. It will be a great pleasure to receive your inquiries. We’ll send you our best quotation in 24 hours. Acceptable formats for free quotation: DXF, DWG, PRT, SAT, IGES, STE My Email: Reply to this email directly. We trust that you will reply us immediately. Regards CNM
