forwarded 902635 https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56264
tag 902635 - moreinfo
tag 902635 - patch
thanks
Hi John!
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 03:38, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On 2/26/20 1:09 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Hi! I'm closing this bug due to lack of response. Please feel free to
> > reopen it or opening a new bug if you can provide us with more
> > information as required.
>
> The issue has not been fixed. Closing a bug without fixing the issue
> behind it makes no sense. Bug reports are supposed to document issues,
> closing reports means hiding issues.
Indeed my fault, this should have been not closed. Sorry for that.
> The issue has not been properly addressed yet because it's fundamentally
> difficult to fix. The bug is a result of an underlying design problem
> which is a result of upstream ignoring that the upper 16 address bits
> in a 64 bit physical address are reserved by Intel.
>
> However, they have actually understood the problem now and they are
> planning to address the problem in the near future since x86_64
> and arm64 are expanding their virtual address spaces as well [1].
Great!
> > [1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56264
>
> --
> .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
> `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
> `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
