Re: kdeextragear, and kdenonbeta

2004-02-18 Thread Alejandro Exojo
El Miércoles, 18 de Febrero de 2004 19:42, Achim Bohnet escribió:
> > I know that kdeextragear* and kdenonbeta are not official KDE modules,
> > but some applications are packaged for Debian, but some interesting
> > others (kimdaba, amarok, ...) are not.
>
> Well there are no official pkgs, but ;) I've announced woody/sid
> kimdaba KDE 3.2 pkg on the kimdaba list. And I've on my system a
> amorak pkg.  AFAIR  I've found them on the amarok home page.

Yes, there are amarok packages, but there aren't in debian, so I can't install 
them from the official debian repositories in my powerpc ;-). There aren't 
source packages neither, only binary. Bringing them to the official debian 
distribution, seems more interesting to me :-)

> I hope that kalyxo.org will sometime in the future provide a
> pool of all those non-official kde pkgs for woody and sarge
> (when sarge is called stable) ;)

I hope too.

Best regards.

-- 
Alex (a.k.a. suy) - GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2
http://darkshines.net/ - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: kdeextragear, and kdenonbeta

2004-02-18 Thread Achim Bohnet
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 16:40, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I know that kdeextragear* and kdenonbeta are not official KDE modules, but 
> some applications are packaged for Debian, but some interesting others 
> (kimdaba, amarok, ...) are not.

Well there are no official pkgs, but ;) I've announced woody/sid
kimdaba KDE 3.2 pkg on the kimdaba list. And I've on my system a
amorak pkg.  AFAIR  I've found them on the amarok home page.

I hope that kalyxo.org will sometime in the future provide a
pool of all those non-official kde pkgs for woody and sarge
(when sarge is called stable) ;)

Achim

> I'm packaging konserve [*], which is in kdenonbeta, and upstream will release 
> a new version next monday. I realized that working without a SVN/CVS 
> repository is a bit tricky, so I considered different options:
> 
> a) Use a local repository in my machine. Problem: it doesn't allows others to 
> check my sources.
> b) Open an alioth project, as many others, just for konserve. Problem: I plan 
> to package others in the future, as soon as my skills improve, and I don't 
> want to create a project for each.
> c) Use KDE's CVS repository.
> d) Ask Qt/KDE mantainers what's their opinion. Maybe someday my package moves 
> to an official module, and it's interesting to keep history. I don't know 
> possible benefits or possible problems of this option, so that's the reason 
> I'm asking to you ;-).
> 
> Any suggestions?
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> [*] It isn't in Debian yet because my sponsor is at Malaga's conference, and 
> he has been a bit busy this days, but a lot of initial minor fixes had been 
> done. If you are curious:
> 
> deb http://darkshines.net/debian unstable konserve
> deb-src http://darkshines.net/debian unstable konserve
> 
> -- 
> Alex
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
  -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]