Re: Getting new gcc-4.0 into testing

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 07:12:15AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> You'll have to add

> urgent gcj-4.0/4.0.2-5j2

> atop the hint.

With an RC bug and 7 days to go, that wouldn't be very effective.  Force
hint was added, and the hint has been accepted today.

> It likely makes more sense to wait on the hinting until a new version of
> gcj is pulled from upstream HEAD, since the RC bug is fixed there already.

Not really; blocking a couple hundred RC bugfixes in C++ packages for a
single gij bug isn't a great tradeoff, even if it is the case that gij fails
to build gjdoc.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: hint for hdparm

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 05:52:40PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,

> Just writing to ask if hdparm can be hinted into testing.

Hint added.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Packages to queue for rebuild for c2 transition

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 07:34:44AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> These all need a rebuild on all architectures, and appear to need
> nothing else:

I'm planning to defer such mass-rebuilds until the c2a transition is under
control.  Stand-alone applications linking against libstdc++5 is not
release-critical.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: testing security status [silliness]

[Nathanael Nerode]

Joey Hess wrote

tetex-bin
too young
blocked by gcc-2.0

  ^^^
Wow, really?  ;-)

I guess that shows that this is a manually generated list :-)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: testing security status

[Russ Allbery]

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> curl
>   2 days old
>   FTBFS on hppa
>   blocked by krb5 (bug #341898 needs to be closed on Dec 13th)

Yup, I'm watching it.  The only remaining issue that I want to see dealt
with is a fix to libapache-mod-auth-kerb before krb5 breaks the version
currently in testing.  See #340360.  I'll send Ghe another message about
that.  I'm willing to upload an NMU if need be (although it would be my
first, so I'm a little nervous about that).

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

testing security status

[Joey Hess]

centericq
9 days old
missing s390 upload (built successfuly 4 days ago)
blocked by gcc-4.0
DTSA issued

chmlib
38 days old!
bocked by xchm, which is blocked by gcc-4.0

coreutils
23 days old!
RC bug
FTBFS on ia64 (pwd test suite failure)

courier
24 days old!
blocked by gcc-4.0

curl
2 days old
FTBFS on hppa
blocked by krb5 (bug #341898 needs to be closed on Dec 13th)

electricsheep
too young

ethereal
too young

flashplugin-nonfree
10 days old
2 security holes that allow arbitrary code execution
2 RC bugs; cannot install the fixed binary from upstream
recommend removal from testing until this is resolved

gtk-2.0
23 days old!
RC bug

inkscape
15 days old
blocked by gcc-4.0
DTSA issued

ipsec-tools
11 days old
RC bug

kdegraphics
too young
blocked by gcc-4.0 and more

libstruts1.2-java
8/10 days old

linux-2.6
too young
RC bug blocking from testing

perl
26 days old!
RC bug
RB bug; missing mips build

slune
78 days old!
blocked by soya

smb4k
35 days old!
blocked by gcc-4.0 and kde
DTSA issued

tetex-bin
too young
blocked by gcc-2.0
RC bugs

trackballs
22 days old!
blocked by gcc-4.0
DTSA issued

uim
4/10 days old
blocked by gcc-4.0

util-vserver
6/10 days old

xpdf
2 days old
blocked by gcc-4.0

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

hint for hdparm

[Stephen Gran]

Hello all,

Just writing to ask if hdparm can be hinted into testing.

Thanks,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Your Woman's Day Customer Service Request

[Virginia Geu]

Please change my address from  Herbert H. Geu 
at 904 15th Street, Aurora, NE 68818-2424 to ---
 
Virginia Geu
112 M Street
Aurora, NE 68818
 
Thank you.   Virginia Geu (Mrs. Herbert 
H. Geu)

Re: Getting new gcc-4.0 into testing

[Matthias Klose]

Nathanael Nerode writes:
> It likely makes more sense to wait on the hinting until a new version of
> gcj is pulled from upstream HEAD, since the RC bug is fixed there already.

no, it does not. 4.2 won't be released before late 2006.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Packages to queue for rebuild for c2 transition

[Nathanael Nerode]

These all need a rebuild on all architectures, and appear to need
nothing else:

adolc
aewm++-goodies
anteater
aranym
ava
ax25mail-utils
battleball
bbdate
bidentd
bk2site
blackbook
bombermaze
bonnie++
buici-clock
cdcover
chemeq
coldsync
craft
crimson
cryptcat
csmash
curves

There are certainly more but I stopped at the end of the c's.

I'm not sure about unicon; is it a library exporting a C++ interface
or not?  :-P  If not, then chinput and unicon can be added to the list.

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in
the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve Lanagasek,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Getting new gcc-4.0 into testing

[Nathanael Nerode]

You'll have to add

urgent gcj-4.0/4.0.2-5j2

atop the hint.

It likely makes more sense to wait on the hinting until a new version of
gcj is pulled from upstream HEAD, since the RC bug is fixed there already.

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Insert famous quote here]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Investigation of the bug

[Enrico Zini]

Hello,

Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw
that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was
just a matter of waiting.

Today I investigated a bit more.  The problem is indeed connected to the
C++ allocator thing, and the recompile was incomplete because debtags
links statically with some libraries, and it's nonobvious to find the
dependencies.  Luckily, thanks to a suggestion of Jonas Smedegaard at
Debconf4, I use dh_buildinfo.

It turned out that the libtagcoll-dev is still built with libstdc++6
4.0.2-3.  It in turn gets statically linked into libapt-front-dev, which
in turn gets statically linked into debtags.


So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered:

Step 1: libtagcoll-dev

Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev
(since they statically link libtagcoll-dev)

Step 3: debtags, debtags-edit, packagesearch
(since they statically link libapt-front-dev)


Thanks,

Enrico


Thanks also to azeem and peterS who helped me figuring some details of
the course of action to follow.
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature