Re: Request for binNMUs for the pth transition (2 packages)
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:38:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:09:30PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > > Can someone please schedule binNMUs for: > > > dirmngr_0.9.6-1, rebuild against libpth2, 1, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, > > > i386, > > > ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > > > gnupg2_1.9.20-2, rebuild against libpth2, 1, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, > > > i386, > > > ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > > AFAIK, this is no longer a transition because libpth20 now provides: > > libpth2? > It still seems to be necessary, because these packages depend on libpth2 > (>= 2.0.7), which can't be satisfied by a virtual libpth2. Aha thanks, queuing now. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#390000: libggi-target-aa: empty package on hppa
package libggi-target-aa severity 39 normal thanks Someone please queue the hppa libggi binNMU. Thank you. On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Julien Louis wrote: >>Package: libggi-target-aa >>Version: 1:2.2.1-4 >>Severity: important >> >>Hi, > >hi > >>as seen on packages.debian.org [1], the libggi-target-aa package is empty >>on hppa. >> >>Looking at the build log, the aa target is disabled at configure time: >> >> checking aalib.h usability... yes >> checking aalib.h presence... yes >> checking for aalib.h... yes >> checking for aa_autoinit in -laa... no >> [...] >> checking if we should build aa target... no >> >>Maybe this is an aalib/hppa problem? > > I don't think so, i've just tested a build in a clean chroot > environment and it seems that aalib is detected well and the resulting > package is not empty. here is the content of the resulting package: > $ dpkg --contents libggi-target-aa_2.2.1-4_hppa.deb > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-10-07 23:59 ./ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-10-07 23:58 ./usr/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-10-07 23:58 ./usr/lib/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-10-07 23:58 ./usr/lib/ggi/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-10-07 23:58 ./usr/lib/ggi/display/ > -rw-r--r-- root/root 16452 2006-10-07 23:58 ./usr/lib/ggi/display/aa.so > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-10-07 23:58 ./usr/share/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-10-07 23:58 ./usr/share/doc/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-10-07 23:58 ./usr/share/man/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-10-07 23:59 ./usr/share/man/man7/ > -rw-r--r-- root/root 347 2006-10-07 23:58 > ./usr/share/man/man7/display-aa.7.gz > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2006-10-07 23:58 > ./usr/share/doc/libggi-target-aa -> libggi2 > >I think a binNMU should be enough to fix this issue if its not a buildd >issue. > >Regards. >-- >Là où l'on brûle des livre, on finira par brûler des hommes. > -+- Heinrich Heine -+- Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- http://v7w.com/anibal signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Hint openssl to testing.
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:46:42AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061002 08:38]: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:02:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 02:46:17AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > > > > Could you please hint openssl to testing? It's frozen because it has > > > > udebs. > > > > > > Already done, will go in as soon as it's aged another day. > > > > I see a hint in aba's file which says: > > unblock openssl/0.9.8b-3 > > > > But it's about version 0.9.8c-2 > > I moved my finished-marker up. Thanks for noticing. Could 0.9.8c-3 please be hinted in? As far as I know, it doesn't contain any RC bug, and I still like to see those security fixes into testing. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
