Please retry qt-x11-free 3.3.8b-2 on alpha mips
Hello, It would be great if you could retry qt-x11-free 3.3.8b-2 builds on alpha and mips. Previous builds failed due to non obvious reasons[1] which don't seem to be architecture specific (unless I'm missing something). 1. http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=qt-x11-free -- Modestas Vainius [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Please retry qt-x11-free 3.3.8b-2 on alpha mips
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 07:15:51PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: It would be great if you could retry qt-x11-free 3.3.8b-2 builds on alpha and mips. Previous builds failed due to non obvious reasons[1] which don't seem to be architecture specific (unless I'm missing something). I think it would be better to fix qt-x11-free not to fail to build randomly? -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: New Debian Installer related hints
* Otavio Salvador [Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:58:21 -0300]: Hello RM team, Here goes a new set of hints, commented. Done. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Chavela Vargas - Vámonos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please retry qt-x11-free 3.3.8b-2 on alpha mips
Hi, 2008 m. February 20 d., Wednesday, Riku Voipio rašė: I think it would be better to fix qt-x11-free not to fail to build randomly? Well, qt-x11-free 3.3.8b-2, which is supposed to end qt3 built with -O0 life cycle in Debian, migration to testing is part of the bigger plan. qt-x11-free 3.3.8b-3 will be built with optimizations (-O2) and will lose over 5700 inline debug symbols (which, as we expect [1], do not matter). So 3.3.8b-3 should enter unstable ASAP to see if transition is really not needed. 3.3.8b-2 in testing will stay as safety fallback for users in case of problems with -3. 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/02/msg00232.html -- Modestas Vainius [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Give back lam on alpha
Dear Debian Release, Since gcc on alpha was affected by #442036, lam FTBFSed due to an ICE on alpha. The recent upload of gfortran+gcc-4.3 yesterday (gcc-4.3 4.3-20080219-1) should have fixed this problem, since another affected package seems to have built there. Under the event that this version of gfortran will be available for the alpha buildd, please give back lam on alpha. Following this, the binNMUs I had requested for other lam related packages[1] may also need to be redone for alpha alone. Following lam, hdf5 also needs to be given back. Therefore, please specify if I need to mail you again for that. Thanks! Kumar [1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/02/msg00156.html -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
