Re: binNMUs for gfortran transition
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 10 March 2008 at 21:23, Riku Voipio wrote: | | Chasing the long tail in gfortran transition.. The following packages | need a binNMU with latest r-base-dev to get rid of atlas3/reblas3 | depends. Aurel32, the list applies for kfreebsd-i386 as well. | | robustbase_0.2-8-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | quadprog_1.4.11-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | qtl_1.07-12-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | polspline_1.0.15-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | lme4_0.99875-9-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | funitroots_260.72-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | fregression_260.72-2, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | foptions_260.72-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | fnonlinear_260.72-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | fgarch_260.72-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | fasianoptions_260.72-2, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | farma_260.72-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 | r-cran-eco_3.1-1-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 I have done my eleven of these thirteen for i386 and just uploaded them. I goofed once [ quadprog ] and uploaded without a proper binNMU version number, which I then corrected but it sorts lower. We'll see what the installer run yields. Scheduled binNMUs for s390. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binNMU for ll-xist
Thomas Viehmann wrote: ll-xist_2.15.5-1, correct python deps, 1, i386 Hi, unfortunately I missed that the generated binary dependencies of python packages differ depending on the default version and accidentally uploaded ll-xist built in an unclean (with respect to the default python version) chroot, making it uninstallable on i386 (only). As such, I would appreciate if you could schedule above binNMU. Scheduled. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binNMUs for gfortran transition
Riku Voipio a écrit : Chasing the long tail in gfortran transition.. The following packages need a binNMU with latest r-base-dev to get rid of atlas3/reblas3 depends. Aurel32, the list applies for kfreebsd-i386 as well. Scheduled for kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64. Thanks robustbase_0.2-8-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 quadprog_1.4.11-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 qtl_1.07-12-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 polspline_1.0.15-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 lme4_0.99875-9-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 funitroots_260.72-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 fregression_260.72-2, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 foptions_260.72-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 fnonlinear_260.72-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 fgarch_260.72-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 fasianoptions_260.72-2, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 farma_260.72-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 r-cran-eco_3.1-1-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binNMUs for gfortran transition
Dirk, On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:01:38PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: I goofed once [ quadprog ] and uploaded without a proper binNMU version number, which I then corrected but it sorts lower. We'll see what the installer run yields. I expect Chris (r-cran-eco) and Steffen (qtl) to follow suit with their packages. There is no need to do such binNMUs[0] manually. Of course it takes a bit of load away from the buildds if you do that, but in return there are no build logs in the central database. The binNMUs are scheduled by Release Team members with access to wanna-build, our central build management tool. Kind regards, Philipp Kern [0] http://wiki.debian.org/binNMU -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Debian Release Assistant `. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-finger pkern/[EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[stable] glibc upload to a fix a bug in nscd
Hi stable release managers, As it seems the rule is to have a new glibc in each stable release ;), we would like to fix bugs #451552/#467609, which prevent nscd to be used to cache hosts. The patch to fix it is a backport from CVS, and the backport has already been tested by a few persons. Would you allow an upload of glibc with this fix into stable? Thanks, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binNMUs for gfortran transition
Philipp, On 11 March 2008 at 12:22, Philipp Kern wrote: | Dirk, | | On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:01:38PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | I goofed once [ quadprog ] and uploaded without a proper binNMU version | number, which I then corrected but it sorts lower. We'll see what the | installer run yields. | | I expect Chris (r-cran-eco) and Steffen (qtl) to follow suit with their | packages. | | There is no need to do such binNMUs[0] manually. Of course it takes a | bit of load away from the buildds if you do that, but in return there | are no build logs in the central database. The binNMUs are scheduled by | Release Team members with access to wanna-build, our central build | management tool. Ah, you learn something new every day :-/. Oh well. Maybe this reaches Chris in time to reward his procrastination as I send my 11 eleven packages up and Steffen followed with an upload of qtl. Thanks for the cluebat! Beste Gruess, Dirk | Kind regards, | Philipp Kern | | [0] http://wiki.debian.org/binNMU | -- | .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer | : :' : http://philkern.de Debian Release Assistant | `. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | `-finger pkern/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
binNMU requests for the libftdi transition
Hi, Could you please schedule the following binNMUs for the libftdi transition: ftdi-eeprom_0.2-8, Rebuild against libftdi1, 1, alpha amd64 armel arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc openocd_0.0+r423-1, Rebuild against libftdi1, 1, alpha amd64 arm i386 ia64 mipsel powerpc s390 sparc Both packages build fine with the new library. Thanks, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: claws-mail_3.3.1-1, rebuild against newer libetpan13 fixes #469550, 1, alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:54:57 -0700 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:00:57AM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: Hi release inhabitants, Subject says it all according wiki's binNMU instructions (I hope to have done it right). Please CC me on replies because I'm not subscribed. The architecture list is meant to be space-delimited, not comma-delimited. I've noticed several people now submitting binNMU requests this way; can you tell me if there's something on the wiki page that could be made clearer? You're right, and the example shows it clearly, but I quickly cut'n'pasted arch list from rmadison output and forgot to remove commas. I've added a two line note about that on the wiki page, feel free to improve the English if required. regards, P.S.: Please CC on replies, I'm not subscribed to debian-release. -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Q: What is printed on the bottom of beer bottles in Minnesota? A: Open other end.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [stable] glibc upload to a fix a bug in nscd
Aurelien Jarno wrote: Hi stable release managers, As it seems the rule is to have a new glibc in each stable release ;), we would like to fix bugs #451552/#467609, which prevent nscd to be used to cache hosts. The patch to fix it is a backport from CVS, and the backport has already been tested by a few persons. Would you allow an upload of glibc with this fix into stable? I seem to remember already answering affirmative to this request? Anyway, go ahead. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bump buildd priority for ldm due to security bug?
ldm is fairly low in the buildd queues for several architectures, possibly because it is priority: extra? it is affected by #469462, a nasty RC and security bug. would it be acceptible to increase it's priority in the buildd queues so that this bugfix can migrate to testing faster? it was mentioned as a possibility when i posted to the secure-testing-team list: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/2008-March/001527.html thanks! live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
