Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?

2008-04-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Grant Grundler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-19 19:08]:
 This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel.
 I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that.

We use gcc-4.1 for the kernel anyway, rather than the default
compiler.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Heads up: ffmpeg transition (SONAME Change!)

2008-04-20 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:28:24AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
 Currently debian/testing ships a very old copy of ffmpeg, dated from
 0.cvs20070307. We, the ffmpeg maintainers (Fabian Greffrath and myself)
 do not consider that version of ffmpeg acceptable for release in debian
 lenny. Many newer applications of ffmpeg (like mplayer) require a newer
 ffmpeg to build, others (like xine) are waiting for debian to update the
 ffmpeg package.

On a related note, what are the plans for ffmpeg encoding? As it is, the
current lenny package seems to have stripped away most everything, leaving
the transcoding support of VLC (among others) near-useless (try using MPEG-1
to stream low-bitrate video...).

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Requesting binNMU of universalindentgui

2008-04-20 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Requesting binNMU of universalindentgui:

 universalindentgui_0.8.0 Rebuild fixes #473349, 1, alpha amd64 arm
   armel i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc 

Finally done. Sorry for the delay.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #300:
Digital Manipulator exceeding velocity parameters


pgpJyohmmNYka.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: bin-NMUs for hunspell transition

2008-04-20 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Rene Engelhard wrote:
 OK, hunspell 1.2.2 uploaded to unstable.
 OK, so now the round of bin-NMUs now that the new hunspell is available on
 all archs..

Done - sorry for the delay. As only icedove and enchant haven't seen a
regular upload in the meantime, only binNMUs for those two have been
scheduled.

Marc
-- 
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
183: Prolog
   Touring vollständig. (Markus Schaber)


pgp3Y4BSW6UyB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: binNMUs for seahorse

2008-04-20 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 please schedule binNMUs for seahorse on all architectures, with a
 dep-wait on epiphany-browser 2.22.1.1-1. This is to rebuild the seahorse
 epiphany extension for version 2.22.

Done.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #293:
You must've hit the wrong anykey.


pgpOG75epvH3w.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: binNMU needed for cairo with dep-wait on pixman

2008-04-20 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Please schedule binNMUs for cairo (1.6.4-1) for all architectures with a 
 dep-wait on pixman 0.10.0-2.
 Note: cairo 1.6.4-1 has not yet been built on alpha.

Done.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #56:
Electricians made popcorn in the power supply


pgpKMLlhW6YT5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: binNMUs for pinot

2008-04-20 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 please schedule binNMUs for pinot 0.84-1 on alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa,
 i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc [1], because of the libgmime 
 ABI
 change without SONAME bump.

Done, together with all other packages that still depend on the old
libgmime2.2 name (balsa, dbmail, mail-notification, pan, pinot,
tracker).

Stephen, if you NMU to change the package name, it would be nice to prod
someone to schedule the necessary binNMUs.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #105:
UPS interrupted the server's power


pgpYdqzqYdYHE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Heads up: ffmpeg transition (SONAME Change!)

2008-04-20 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Reinhard Tartler [Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:28:24 +0200]:

 If there are no serious objections, I plan to upload ffmpeg mid to end
 of next week. If the release team asks me to upload sooner, no problem.

Hello Reinhard, thanks for the heads-up. However, we would really
appreciate if you could hold the upload to unstable until we find a spot
for it, possibly right after the python transition.

alpha is not doing very well atm, so we're not being able to get
transitions out the door, and adding more transitions in unstable would
probably have the net effect of delaying them all more.

Is that doable for you?

Thanks,

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org
 
Will you just stand still?
-- Luke Danes


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Heads up: ffmpeg transition (SONAME Change!)

2008-04-20 Thread Reinhard Tartler

 * Reinhard Tartler [Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:28:24 +0200]:

 If there are no serious objections, I plan to upload ffmpeg mid to end
 of next week. If the release team asks me to upload sooner, no problem.

Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hello Reinhard, thanks for the heads-up. However, we would really
 appreciate if you could hold the upload to unstable until we find a spot
 for it, possibly right after the python transition.
 ...

 Is that doable for you?

That's perfectly fine for me. I'll ask you on IRC again next week end. If
I am not available or you have the feeling that the package could get
into unstable sooner, feel free to upload the ffmpeg-free source package
in experimental to unstable via NMU at your convenience.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4



Re: zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12

2008-04-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 18 April 2008, Mark Brown wrote:
 Please allow the current zlib to transition to lenny.  This version adds
 triarch builds of the library package for MIPS:

As Otavio seems busy: no objection from D-I PoV.

Cheers,
FJP


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: RFH: Multiarch capable toolchain as release goal

2008-04-20 Thread Bernd Zeimetz

 Why did I guess the name of binutils' maintainer correctly _before_
 looking into the PTS?

You're not alone.

 I bet that multiarch gets included into Ubuntu about two weeks after
 we released lenny without multiarch.

That's indeed the way the maintainer seems to work, and he keeps sitting
on way too many packages, stopping progress in Debian. Thanks for the fish.

Multiarch should indeed go into Lenny, please consider an exception for it.


-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz   Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RFH: Multiarch capable toolchain as release goal

2008-04-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:28:23PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
  I bet that multiarch gets included into Ubuntu about two weeks after
  we released lenny without multiarch.
 
 That's indeed the way the maintainer seems to work, and he keeps sitting
 on way too many packages, stopping progress in Debian. Thanks for the fish.
 
 Multiarch should indeed go into Lenny, please consider an exception for it.

Before you bring this to the tech ctte and such, don't you need a refusal
by the maintainer?  I mean, AFAIK on this issue the only response has been
silence.  And the usual way to deal with silence is to interpret it as lack
of time rather than refusal (and accordingly send a polite offer to NMU).

-- 
Robert Millan

The technological evasion of the license is as unacceptable as the
 legal evasion of the license [...].  That's the provision in section
 1 regarding keys. [...]  We say one thing: when you sell somebody a
 home... give him the keys  -- Eben Moglen on GPLv3


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?

2008-04-20 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:23:42AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 * Grant Grundler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-19 19:08]:
  This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel.
  I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that.
 
 We use gcc-4.1 for the kernel anyway, rather than the default
 compiler.

fwiw, i'm comfortable with switching the kernel to gcc-4.2. i've been
using it for kernels on all my boxes since around christmas, i believe
(when i found problems with gcc-3.4 that made me move.)

i haven't tried it on any older boxes (pa1.1 based) but it seems to be
working well enough both 32-bit and 64-bit on my newer machines.

cheers, kyle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]