Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing
Hi Marc, On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 02:53, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mikhail Gusarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 to move into testing, as it fixes RC bug (#492732) which prevents building documentation for python-matplotlib. 0.4.2 is a minor upstream release made especially for fixing this bug. The only other packaging change is getting rid of bundled jQuery in binary package. But there are plenty of upstream changes. Please extract the patch needed to fix #492732 and upload a fixed version based on 0.4.1-2 (currently in lenny) to testing-proposed-updates. This new upstream release won't be unblocked. I'd like to discuss, based on the above comment, what I should do about matplotlib. Currently the archive has 0.98.1 mpl version, and we're working closely with upstream to let a new upstream release into Debian. The real goal for the new release is bugfixing and mainly documentation. We missed 0.98.2 version because of some glitches in doc generation, and we have reached yesterday the consensus on releasing 0.98.3 (they wait for my confirmation the debian package is working fine). I got the package almost ready in svn, and the great improvement is we are now able to generate matplotlib documentation at build time, and ship it in -doc package along with the binary one. It's a lot of doc, and given the possibility to users to have it on their system is really a plus (given the lots of API mpl has), and I think lenny users deserve this. In order to build such doc we need Sphinx 0.4.2 (due to changes in last version of sphinx, used in mpl docbase), and it's really impossible to backport the changes from 0.98.3 to 0.98.1 (the one in the archive). I'd like to know if I'm allowed to upload 0.98.3 version in the archive (when the sphinx situation will be fixed). Please note that upstreams are really responsive and they have waited for Debian to be comfortable with a new release before actually announce it in the last months. Thanks for your attention, Sandro -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pam
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:08:49PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=451722 Is pam getting an exception from the freeze? Yes, I discussed this with the release team and got approval prior to uploading. All I had to do was promise that it was 100% regression-free. ;) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?
Dear release team, the package iso-codes has accumulated some translation updates since the last upload. I'm wondering whether you would grant a freeze exception if I upload to unstable. Please note that this would be a new upstream release, including some minor changes in the msgids to be translated. The changelog is as follows: [ ISO-639 ] * Update to 2008-07-08: - oc/oci: Provençal; provençal added Date added to Provençal - pro: 'Old Occitan (to 1500)' added as alternate name - wal: Walamo deprecated. Replaced by 'Wolaitta; Wolaytta' [ ISO-639-3 ] * Update to 2008-07-11 [ ISO-3166 translations ] * Fix encoding in Breton. Closes: alioth#310933 * Marathi updated by Sampada Nakhare * Remove fuzzy strings for Breton. * Brazilian Portuguese updated by Felipe Augusto van de Wiel * Korean updated by Changwoo Ryu (TP) * Malay updated by Nicholas Ng (Pootle) * Serbian updated by Veselin Mijušković (Pootle) [ ISO-3166-2 translations ] * Remove fuzzy strings for Greek. * Italian by Milo Casagrande (TP) * Lithuanian updated by Kestutis Biliūnas. [ ISO-639 translations ] * Thai by Theppitak Karoonboonyanan * Russian by Yuri Kozlov * Italian by Milo Casagrande (TP) * Irish by Kevin Scannell (TP) * Vietnamese by Clytie Siddall (TP) * Marathi corrections by pn-guest. Closes: alioth#310943 * Konkani corrections by pn-guest. Closes: alioth#310943 * Xhosa corrections by pn-guest. Closes: alioth#310932 * Basque updated by Piarres Beobide. Closes: #490908 [ ISO-639-3 translations ] * Thai by Theppitak Karoonboonyanan * Marathi corrections by pn-guest. Closes: alioth#310943 * Konkani corrections by pn-guest. Closes: alioth#310943 * Xhosa corrections by pn-guest. Closes: alioth#310932 [ ISO-4217 translations ] * German by Tobias Quathamer Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Quathamer | Time wounds all heels. -- Groucho Marx Hamburg, Germany | signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: pam
On Friday 01 August 2008 16:47, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:08:49PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=451722 Is pam getting an exception from the freeze? Yes, I discussed this with the release team and got approval prior to uploading. All I had to do was promise that it was 100% regression-free. ;) Great! http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493181 In the above bug report I have requested a config file comment change and suggested that an application be made to have it included in Lenny. I realise that comment changes won't be really desired by the release team, but I think it would be really good to have the comments matching the latest code. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gnucash freeze exemption request
Hallo Thomas, am Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:08:18PM -0700 hast du folgendes geschrieben: Gnucash 2.2.6 has been released. See previous emails from me on the subject. I'm now seeking approval to upload 2.2.6 and have it hinted for testing, which will (among other things) close all the RC and the relevant important bugs currently against gnucash, make HBCI work properly, and otherwise be good in every way. :) please go ahead. I will increase the ageing needed for propagation to testing, though, to get proper regression testing in unstable. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Debian Release Assistant `. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-finger pkern/[EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 06:51:58AM +, Tobias Quathamer wrote: Dear release team, the package iso-codes has accumulated some translation updates since the last upload. I'm wondering whether you would grant a freeze exception if I upload to unstable. Please note that this would be a new upstream release, New upstream is not good sorry. Translation updates are 100% okay, cherry-picking important fixes from a new upstream too, but a full new upstream isn't. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpUZLwQb1Jyj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: policycoreutils 2.0.49-5
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:09:32AM +, Russell Coker wrote: Please include version 2.0.49-5 in Lenny. The progress report is necessary to stop users getting confused and pushing reset on an autorelabel operation. It's uploaded to unstable now. Well we can't decide if I can't see neither the package changelog nor the debdiff. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgp9SxKI5Yylr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: seeking freeze exception for tbb
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:55:23PM +, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: - the inclusion of proper SONAME support This is an important change that doesn't meet the freeze exception guidelines. So sorry, but no thanks. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpCrkeXNNhKy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Please allow multipath-tools and multipath-tools-initramfs into lenny
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:25:52AM +, Guido Günther wrote: Hi, Changes to multipath-tools 0.4.8-11: RC Bug: * [4f8a5d1] Call multipath via udev on block device add/change events This helps slow devices when either /etc/init.d/multipath-tools-boot or the initramfs script are being run although the devices are not ready yet. (Closes: #489850) - many thanks to Janusz Dziemidowicz for his suggestions and testing Robustness: * [3dadace] use the full path to dmsetup so we don't have to worry about $PATH * [33642da] update initramfs during postinst/postrm (Closes: #477839) Upgrade Path: * [41391c9] Conflict on etch's multipath-tools-initramfs - together with the multipath-tools-initramfs NMU from Bernd Zeimetz this provides a clean upgrade path from etch to lenny for multipath-tools-initramfs users. Translation: * [5cbb079] add swedish debconf translation (Closes: #492107) - thanks to Martin Ågren Cleanup: * [12639e9] redo quilt patches - no code changes The numbers in braces give the git commit id's $ID. The patches can be seen at: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-lvm/multipath-tools.git;a=commit;h=$ID Please allow this package into lenny there were no code changes on the upstream code and there are no reverse dependencies. The udeb isn't an issue since multipath support isn't part of d-i. Changes to multipath-tools-initramfs 1.0.1+nmu1: This package is obsoleted by multipath-tools-boot (from multipath-tools). Bernd NMUed the package to allow for a clean upgrade patch from etch. Multipath-tools-initramfs as of 1.0.1 isn't installable in sid/lenny. I believe this package has an udeb, but it's fine by me if d-i agrees. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpkmKFJ0rQj2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: unblocking partman-multipath
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:28:24AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Guido Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, please unblock partman-multipath. There's no version in lenny yet. This way folks building custom installers (due to #440675) can pull from lenny instead of sid. Hello Guido, Let's see if we can (I and you) produce a patch Parted's 1.8 branch using the fixes we made for 1.9. I won't upload 1.9 for Debian now and if we do it fast, after Parted migrates to lenny, we might test it and try to get an exception. However until that is done, I wouldn't like to have unused udebs on lenny. I've ported the necessary patches from 1.9 + the Debian specific parts over to Debian's 1.8: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/agx/parted1.8.git;a=summary I can attach one patch that goes into debian/patches to the BTS once you've reviewed that. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 08:05:45AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 06:51:58AM +, Tobias Quathamer wrote: Dear release team, the package iso-codes has accumulated some translation updates since the last upload. I'm wondering whether you would grant a freeze exception if I upload to unstable. Please note that this would be a new upstream release, New upstream is not good sorry. Translation updates are 100% okay, cherry-picking important fixes from a new upstream too, but a full new upstream isn't. I was almost sure there was a library in iso-codes, there isn't I stand corrected hence it falls in the same category as documentations and it's probably okay. unblocked. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpmhhUuz1NOK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:23:31AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 08:05:45AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 06:51:58AM +, Tobias Quathamer wrote: Dear release team, the package iso-codes has accumulated some translation updates since the last upload. I'm wondering whether you would grant a freeze exception if I upload to unstable. Please note that this would be a new upstream release, New upstream is not good sorry. Translation updates are 100% okay, cherry-picking important fixes from a new upstream too, but a full new upstream isn't. I was almost sure there was a library in iso-codes, there isn't I stand corrected hence it falls in the same category as documentations and it's probably okay. unblocked. When you will have uploaded it of course ;P -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgp4BRSHann8Y.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?
On Friday 01 August 2008 11:24:37 Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:23:31AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: I was almost sure there was a library in iso-codes, there isn't I stand corrected hence it falls in the same category as documentations and it's probably okay. unblocked. When you will have uploaded it of course ;P Oh, that's great news, thanks a lot. I'll prepare the upload. Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Quathamer | Time wounds all heels. -- Groucho Marx Hamburg, Germany | signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)
Hi,
I've re-rolled the current package with a different changelog and
control file. This is the diff:
=== modified file 'debian/changelog'
--- debian/changelog2008-07-29 08:31:28 +
+++ debian/changelog2008-08-01 10:03:35 +
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+funkload (1.6.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * added python-docutils (closes: #493205)
+ * suggests - recommends due to the high usability impact
+ * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatibilty issue with 1.3.9)
+
+ -- Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:11:58 +0200
+
funkload (1.6.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
* upgraded to new standards version
=== modified file 'debian/control'
--- debian/control 2008-07-29 08:31:28 +
+++ debian/control 2008-08-01 09:11:33 +
@@ -8,9 +8,8 @@
Package: funkload
Architecture: all
-Depends: python (= 2.4), python-central (= 0.5), python-pkg-resources,
python-webunit
-Suggests: python-gdchart2
-Recommends: tcpwatch-httpproxy
+Depends: python (= 2.4), python-central (= 0.5), python-pkg-resources,
python-webunit (=1.3.8)
+Recommends: tcpwatch-httpproxy, python-gdchart2, python-docutils
XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions}
Description: web testing tool
This web testing tool is designed to allow testing the functionality
The package, along with everything, is available at
http://people.debian.org/~toni/funkload/ and can imho be injected into
Lenny without risk.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)
Hi. Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/08/2008): + * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatibilty issue with 1.3.9) -Depends: python (= 2.4), python-central (= 0.5), python-pkg-resources, python-webunit +Depends: python (= 2.4), python-central (= 0.5), python-pkg-resources, python-webunit (=1.3.8) I wonder how it's supposed to work since there's: |$ rmadison python-webunit | python-webunit | 1.8-1.1.2 | testing | source, all | python-webunit | 1.8-1.1.2 | unstable | source, all I even came to wonder whether I wasn't pasting the appropriate package name. (And anyway using = will make it hard to track any newer revision. Not to mention binNMUs.) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
What to do with brasero?
Hi, brasero 0.8.0-1 (uploaded before the freeze) is ready to migrate, but it failed to build on alpha and therefore won't migrate. However version 0.7.1-3 which is in testing already failed to build on alpha, but it was forced in testing nevertheless; alpha still has 0.6.1-1 in testing. Here is the course of action I propose: * Removal of the alpha binary in testing; it’s not a good idea to release with a discrepancy in versions anyway, and we can’t provide security support. * That will let 0.8.0-1 in testing where this version will get wider testing. * Open a RC bug wrt. the FTBFS on alpha (why isn’t it open yet?) * Slap ember and alanbach, who wanted so much brasero 0.8 in lenny, so that they fix it :) Do you find this approach suitable? Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)
Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + * added python-docutils (closes: #493205) + * suggests - recommends due to the high usability impact + * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatibilty issue with 1.3.9) Rejected. Don't use =, but Conflict with = 1.3.9 or whatever the correct version is. Marc -- BOFH #236: Fanout dropping voltage too much, try cutting some of those little traces pgpK85aPbj3At.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: What to do with brasero?
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Here is the course of action I propose: * Removal of the alpha binary in testing; it’s not a good idea to release with a discrepancy in versions anyway, and we can’t provide security support. I guess you mean removal of the binary from unstable. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Debian Release Assistant `. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-finger pkern/[EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: What to do with brasero?
Le vendredi 01 août 2008 à 12:51 +0200, Philipp Kern a écrit : On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Here is the course of action I propose: * Removal of the alpha binary in testing; it’s not a good idea to release with a discrepancy in versions anyway, and we can’t provide security support. I guess you mean removal of the binary from unstable. Both unstable and testing, I guess. brasero | 0.6.1-1+b1 | testing | alpha brasero | 0.6.1-1+b1 | unstable | alpha -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)
Hi Cyril, On Fri, 01.08.2008 at 12:27:49 +0200, Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/08/2008): + * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatibilty issue with 1.3.9) -Depends: python (= 2.4), python-central (= 0.5), python-pkg-resources, python-webunit +Depends: python (= 2.4), python-central (= 0.5), python-pkg-resources, python-webunit (=1.3.8) I wonder how it's supposed to work since there's: |$ rmadison python-webunit | python-webunit | 1.8-1.1.2 | testing | source, all | python-webunit | 1.8-1.1.2 | unstable | source, all I have just discovered that Mathias Klose trashed my 1.3.8 version from July 15th, without telling me, for no reason that I am aware of, and, I also don't know where that upstream version should come from - PYPI has 1.3.9, and Richard's home page ceased to have a new version after 1.3.8. So... this must either be an entirely different package, or it's a quite bogus upload, imho. I've mailed both Mathias Klose and Izak Burger to ask for an explanation. I even came to wonder whether I wasn't pasting the appropriate package name. Me too, when I saw the python-webunit download. (And anyway using = will make it hard to track any newer revision. Not to mention binNMUs.) Ok... I can fix that to = 1.3.8, 1.3.9 (but didn't think of it when I rolled the patch, sorry). Kind regards, --Toni++ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: What to do with brasero?
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: * Open a RC bug wrt. the FTBFS on alpha (why isn’t it open yet?) This have to be done anyway. The code is broken about the usage of the va_list type. Bastian -- Earth -- mother of the most beautiful women in the universe. -- Apollo, Who Mourns for Adonais? stardate 3468.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Allow debian-edu-install to propagate to testing
Hi. The current debian-edu-install package in unstable (0.672) got udebs, and are thus blocked from propagating into testing automatically. It has had its required resting time, and it would be great if it was allowed to propagate into testing. It was uploaded before the freeze. Cc til debian-boot, to allow them to comment on the udeb issue. Since the upload we have discovered and fixed some bugs in the package, which are currently being tested in the Debian Edu repository. We will need at least another update before Lenny is released, and hope it can be accepted too. We will get back to you about this. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
request for a freeze exception for mercurial
Hi,
mercurial 1.0.1-3 (currently in lenny) is incompatible with
python-subversion = 1.5 (it works with python-subversion 1.4 that
is not in lenny anymore). This bug does not touch the core mercurial
operations but it prevents any conversion from subversion repository
to mercurial.
Upstream made a patch I added in mercurial 1.0.1-4 (currently in
sid). This bug was discovered near the freeze time (but I was in
vacation) and fully fixed upstream only yesterday.
I would be very pleased if you accept to add a freeze exception
for mercurial so that it can migrate after 10 days in sid.
Note: in mercurial 1.0.1-4, I also fix a bashism in postinst.
The interdiff between -3 and -4 is attached to this mail (there is
a changelog entry, the fix for bashism and the patch for #492244 in the
quilt series)
Best regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
Unofficial pacakges: http://www-id.imag.fr/~danjean/deb.html#package
APT repo: deb http://perso.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
diff -u mercurial-1.0.1/debian/changelog mercurial-1.0.1/debian/changelog
--- mercurial-1.0.1/debian/changelog
+++ mercurial-1.0.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+mercurial (1.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * fix subversion 1.5 compatibility (Closes: #492244)
+using upstream patch
+ * fix bashism in postinst
+
+ -- Vincent Danjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:27:51 +0200
+
mercurial (1.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
diff -u mercurial-1.0.1/debian/mercurial.postinst
mercurial-1.0.1/debian/mercurial.postinst
--- mercurial-1.0.1/debian/mercurial.postinst
+++ mercurial-1.0.1/debian/mercurial.postinst
@@ -18,10 +18,14 @@
# the debian-policy package
check_ext() {
-local file=$1
-local ext=$2
-local dep=$3
-local enable=true
+local file
+local ext
+local dep
+local enable
+file=$1
+ext=$2
+dep=$3
+enable=true
case $dep in
wish)
diff -u mercurial-1.0.1/debian/patches/series
mercurial-1.0.1/debian/patches/series
--- mercurial-1.0.1/debian/patches/series
+++ mercurial-1.0.1/debian/patches/series
@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+backport__svn1.5-fix.patch
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- mercurial-1.0.1.orig/debian/patches/backport__svn1.5-fix.patch
+++ mercurial-1.0.1/debian/patches/backport__svn1.5-fix.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+diff -r e37fa751182a -r 6ec941b6003d hgext/convert/subversion.py
+--- a/hgext/convert/subversion.py Fri Jul 25 13:26:16 2008 +0200
b/hgext/convert/subversion.py Wed Jul 30 22:26:41 2008 +0200
+@@ -130,18 +130,6 @@
+ self._stdout.close()
+ self._stdout = None
+
+-def get_log(url, paths, start, end, limit=0, discover_changed_paths=True,
+-strict_node_history=False):
+-args = [url, paths, start, end, limit, discover_changed_paths,
+-strict_node_history]
+-arg = encodeargs(args)
+-hgexe = util.hgexecutable()
+-cmd = '%s debugsvnlog' % util.shellquote(hgexe)
+-stdin, stdout = os.popen2(cmd, 'b')
+-stdin.write(arg)
+-stdin.close()
+-return logstream(stdout)
+-
+ # SVN conversion code stolen from bzr-svn and tailor
+ #
+ # Subversion looks like a versioned filesystem, branches structures
+@@ -188,6 +176,7 @@
+ # Module is either empty or a repository path starting with
+ # a slash and not ending with a slash.
+ self.module = self.url[len(self.base):]
++self.prevmodule = None
+ self.rootmodule = self.module
+ self.commits = {}
+ self.paths = {}
+@@ -250,7 +239,7 @@
+ def getheads(self):
+
+ def isdir(path, revnum):
+-kind = svn.ra.check_path(self.ra, path, revnum)
++kind = self._checkpath(path, revnum)
+ return kind == svn.core.svn_node_dir
+
+ def getcfgpath(name, rev):
+@@ -393,7 +382,7 @@
+ tagspath = self.tags
+ start = svn.ra.get_latest_revnum(self.ra)
+ try:
+-for entry in get_log(self.url, [self.tags], start, self.startrev):
++for entry in self._getlog([self.tags], start, self.startrev):
+ origpaths, revnum, author, date, message = entry
+ copies = [(e.copyfrom_path, e.copyfrom_rev, p) for p, e
+ in origpaths.iteritems() if e.copyfrom_path]
+@@ -478,9 +467,9 @@
+ if not stop:
+ stop = svn.ra.get_latest_revnum(self.ra)
+ try:
+-self.reparent('')
++prevmodule = self.reparent('')
+ dirent = svn.ra.stat(self.ra, path.strip('/'), stop)
+-self.reparent(self.module)
++self.reparent(prevmodule)
+ except SubversionException:
+ dirent = None
+ if not dirent:
+@@ -489,7 +478,7 @@
+ # stat() gives us the previous revision on this line of
Re: openal-soft hppa giveback
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:48:48AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Hi RMs, Hi Paul (not a RM is speaking), openal-soft got hit by cmake failing to build on hppa due to a bug in glibc. Please give-back: gb openal-soft_1:1.4.272-1 . hppa just built and uploaded Sorry to have forgot about your last message to me... cheers, Domenico -[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unblocking partman-multipath
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Guido Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:28:24AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Guido Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, please unblock partman-multipath. There's no version in lenny yet. This way folks building custom installers (due to #440675) can pull from lenny instead of sid. Hello Guido, Let's see if we can (I and you) produce a patch Parted's 1.8 branch using the fixes we made for 1.9. I won't upload 1.9 for Debian now and if we do it fast, after Parted migrates to lenny, we might test it and try to get an exception. However until that is done, I wouldn't like to have unused udebs on lenny. I've ported the necessary patches from 1.9 + the Debian specific parts over to Debian's 1.8: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/agx/parted1.8.git;a=summary I can attach one patch that goes into debian/patches to the BTS once you've reviewed that. Patch looks OK. It is not invassive but due the new attribute on LinuxSpecific we'll have a different ABI. RT would be acceptable for you to have this mini transition now? That is the last missing part to fully support multipath on d-i. - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkiS+k8ACgkQLqiZQEml+FWsMgCfUgTcqGoJCyPa+SJHB/UBjkpI QqQAoKfixdvpiIpcFW3lucwlngKibXv3 =64DU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please remove icedove/2.0.0.14-1/armel from testing
Hi, This might actually be a job for ftpmaster removals (since the testing hints is not aware of archs?), but I'll ask for feeback forst. Until icedove is based on xulrunner-1.9, icedove wont work on armel. The old version in testing crashes on armel, and the new version in unstable doesn't even build. By removing armel version from testing, icedove will be able to migrate to testing (fixing a RC bug and a good bunch of security bugs). Freeze exception needed too, it seems. -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please remove icedove/2.0.0.14-1/armel from testing
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:11:06PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: This might actually be a job for ftpmaster removals (since the testing hints is not aware of archs?), but I'll ask for feeback forst. Architecture removals are done by the ftp team. Until icedove is based on xulrunner-1.9, icedove wont work on armel. The old version in testing crashes on armel, and the new version in unstable doesn't even build. Is there a reason why you don't fix the actual problem (-fshort-wchar) and don't even mention here that the cause of the build problem is actually known? By removing armel version from testing, icedove will be able to migrate to testing (fixing a RC bug and a good bunch of security bugs). Freeze exception needed too, it seems. The build failure is an RC bug on its own. Bastian -- Deflector shields just came on, Captain. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unblocking partman-multipath
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 08:58:19AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: RT would be acceptable for you to have this mini transition now? That is the last missing part to fully support multipath on d-i. Unfortunately that's not entirely true: we're also still lacking grub2 patches but Robert wanted to work on it (#483971). It is indeed the last missing udeb so we (hopefully) won't have to touch d-i for that anymore. Anyways: providing a patched grub later on is far easier than telling people they'll have to rebuild d-i for multipath. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Allow debian-edu-install to propagate to testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi. The current debian-edu-install package in unstable (0.672) got udebs, and are thus blocked from propagating into testing automatically. It has had its required resting time, and it would be great if it was allowed to propagate into testing. It was uploaded before the freeze. Cc til debian-boot, to allow them to comment on the udeb issue. Since the upload we have discovered and fixed some bugs in the package, which are currently being tested in the Debian Edu repository. We will need at least another update before Lenny is released, and hope it can be accepted too. We will get back to you about this. No objection - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkiS/9YACgkQLqiZQEml+FUVRwCfRayXMQprn6j8YQwt53vqcvmP UEMAoLv555qMbLM8rwOdx40Hka+4YY9t =V87N -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please allow multipath-tools and multipath-tools-initramfs into lenny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:25:52AM +, Guido Günther wrote: Hi, Changes to multipath-tools 0.4.8-11: RC Bug: * [4f8a5d1] Call multipath via udev on block device add/change events This helps slow devices when either /etc/init.d/multipath-tools-boot or the initramfs script are being run although the devices are not ready yet. (Closes: #489850) - many thanks to Janusz Dziemidowicz for his suggestions and testing Robustness: * [3dadace] use the full path to dmsetup so we don't have to worry about $PATH * [33642da] update initramfs during postinst/postrm (Closes: #477839) Upgrade Path: * [41391c9] Conflict on etch's multipath-tools-initramfs - together with the multipath-tools-initramfs NMU from Bernd Zeimetz this provides a clean upgrade path from etch to lenny for multipath-tools-initramfs users. Translation: * [5cbb079] add swedish debconf translation (Closes: #492107) - thanks to Martin Ågren Cleanup: * [12639e9] redo quilt patches - no code changes The numbers in braces give the git commit id's $ID. The patches can be seen at: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-lvm/multipath-tools.git;a=commit;h=$ID Please allow this package into lenny there were no code changes on the upstream code and there are no reverse dependencies. The udeb isn't an issue since multipath support isn't part of d-i. Changes to multipath-tools-initramfs 1.0.1+nmu1: This package is obsoleted by multipath-tools-boot (from multipath-tools). Bernd NMUed the package to allow for a clean upgrade patch from etch. Multipath-tools-initramfs as of 1.0.1 isn't installable in sid/lenny. I believe this package has an udeb, but it's fine by me if d-i agrees. No objection - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkiS/7cACgkQLqiZQEml+FUvKACfddHFVoJphpTIfKlVVPvuzM0V uo0AoJ0DvLPgpv3jU9ZXhLzBc2ZY1n5d =GuVj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please unblock util-vserver
Hi, I am writing to request the manual unblock of util-vserver 0.30.216~r2750-3 which was uploaded last night to fix a RC bug in the package that was uploaded before the freeze, but had not migrated to testing yet. This version of the package only has the fix for the RC bug #491072 and no other changes. Thank you, and here's to a great release! micah signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: please remove icedove/2.0.0.14-1/armel from testing
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:36:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:11:06PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: This might actually be a job for ftpmaster removals (since the testing hints is not aware of archs?), but I'll ask for feeback forst. Architecture removals are done by the ftp team. bug filed (#493223) Until icedove is based on xulrunner-1.9, icedove wont work on armel. The old version in testing crashes on armel, and the new version in unstable doesn't even build. Is there a reason why you don't fix the actual problem (-fshort-wchar) and don't even mention here that the cause of the build problem is actually known? Because even if it would build, it doesn't *work* on armel? icedove is based on xulrunner-1.8 which doesn't have arm eabi support. A earlier attempt to make Firefox 2.0 work (also based on xulrunner 1.8) failed. There was too much refactoring done in that part of portability layer(s), and it was not deemed usefull work when FF 3.0 which already included arm eabi support was about to be released. By removing armel version from testing, icedove will be able to migrate to testing (fixing a RC bug and a good bunch of security bugs). Freeze exception needed too, it seems. The build failure is an RC bug on its own. Technically yes, since it's a regression, but since the previous builds were broken from users point of few there is no regression... -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock util-vserver
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:57:38PM +, Micah Anderson wrote: Hi, I am writing to request the manual unblock of util-vserver 0.30.216~r2750-3 which was uploaded last night to fix a RC bug in the package that was uploaded before the freeze, but had not migrated to testing yet. This version of the package only has the fix for the RC bug #491072 and no other changes. unblocked. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpqUaEihRLZi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Allow debian-edu-install to propagate to testing
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:21:54PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi. The current debian-edu-install package in unstable (0.672) got No objection unblocked -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpwAFJ4JwPGt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Please allow multipath-tools and multipath-tools-initramfs into lenny
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:21:13PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:25:52AM +, Guido Günther wrote: Changes to multipath-tools 0.4.8-11: I believe this package has an udeb, but it's fine by me if d-i agrees. No objection unblocked. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgplxnSeOYYC5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?
On Friday 01 August 2008 11:28:32 Tobias Quathamer wrote: On Friday 01 August 2008 11:24:37 Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:23:31AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: I was almost sure there was a library in iso-codes, there isn't I stand corrected hence it falls in the same category as documentations and it's probably okay. unblocked. When you will have uploaded it of course ;P Oh, that's great news, thanks a lot. I'll prepare the upload. I've now uploaded iso-codes. Please note that the package contains a udeb and should get permission from the D-I team to migrate to testing. I've added them as CC. Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Quathamer | Dyslexics have more fnu. Hamburg, Germany | signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Please unblock eject/2.1.5+deb1-1
Hi.
Please allow eject into testing. It only contains a translation update
and some very minor fixes, but due to me moving some files around in
the .orig.tar.gz the debdiff is very huge.
I realize that me finally fixing the upstream tarball to make live of
translators easier coinsided badly with the freeze, so if wanted I can
upload only the debconf translation update to lenny-proposed-updates
instead if wanted.
Anyway, here is a debdiff *without* the effects of the repacking:
diff -Nru eject-2.1.5/debian/changelog eject-2.1.5+deb1/debian/changelog
--- eject-2.1.5/debian/changelog2008-07-31 18:39:25.0 +0200
+++ eject-2.1.5+deb1/debian/changelog 2008-07-31 18:39:26.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+eject (2.1.5+deb1-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Create new upstream tar ball so that we can get rid of
+these strange named .po files. Closes: #336792, #336810
+ * New git repository online, add Vcs-* fields.
+ * Add Homepage field.
+ * Debconf translations:
+- Lithuanian added. Closes: #490779
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:42:07 +0200
+
eject (2.1.5-10) unstable; urgency=medium
* Debconf translations:
diff -Nru eject-2.1.5/debian/control eject-2.1.5+deb1/debian/control
--- eject-2.1.5/debian/control 2008-07-31 18:39:25.0 +0200
+++ eject-2.1.5+deb1/debian/control 2008-07-31 18:39:26.0 +0200
@@ -4,6 +4,9 @@
Build-Depends: gettext, debhelper (= 6.0.7), dpkg-dev (= 1.13.2),
libdevmapper-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64]
Maintainer: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Standards-Version: 3.8.0
+Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/eject.git
+Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/eject.git
+Homepage: http://www.pobox.com/~tranter/eject.html
Package: eject
Architecture: any
diff -Nru eject-2.1.5/debian/po/lt.po eject-2.1.5+deb1/debian/po/lt.po
--- eject-2.1.5/debian/po/lt.po 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ eject-2.1.5+deb1/debian/po/lt.po2008-07-31 18:39:26.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+# Lithuanian messages for eject package.
+# Copyright (C) 2003 Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
+# This file is distributed under the same license as package eject.
+# Kęstutis Biliūnas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008.
+
+msgid
+msgstr
+Project-Id-Version: eject\n
+Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n
+POT-Creation-Date: 2004-04-11 23:40+0200\n
+PO-Revision-Date: 2008-07-14 12:20+0300\n
+Last-Translator: Kęstutis Biliūnas [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n
+Language-Team: Lithuanian [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n
+MIME-Version: 1.0\n
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+#. Type: text
+#. description
+#: ../eject-udeb.templates:3
+msgid Eject a CD from the drive
+msgstr Išimti diską iš CD įrenginio
+
diff -Nru eject-2.1.5/eject.c eject-2.1.5+deb1/eject.c
--- eject-2.1.5/eject.c 2008-07-31 18:39:25.0 +0200
+++ eject-2.1.5+deb1/eject.c2008-07-31 18:39:26.0 +0200
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@
printf(\n);
#else
- fprintf(stderr, _(%s: CD-ROM select speed command not supported by
thiskernel\n), programName);
+ fprintf(stderr, _(%s: CD-ROM select speed command not supported by
this kernel\n), programName);
#endif
}
@@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@
const char* dev = GetDevmapperDevice (s1);
if (dev) {
if (v_option)
-printf(_(%s: %s is encrypted on real device
%s\n),
+printf(_(%s: %s is encrypted on real device
%s\n),
programName, s1, dev);
} else
dev = s1;
@@ -1131,10 +1131,10 @@
const char* dev = GetDevmapperDevice (name);
if (dev) {
if (v_option)
-printf(_(%s: %s is encrypted on real device %s\n),
+printf(_(%s: %s is encrypted on real device %s\n),
programName, name, dev);
name = dev;
-}
+}
for (i = 0; partitionDevice[i] != 0; i++) {
/* look for ^/dev/foo[a-z]([0-9]?[0-9])?$, e.g. /dev/hda1 */
And a diffstat for the full debdiff:
debian/changelog | 11 +
debian/control|3
debian/po/lt.po | 23 ++
eject.c |8
po/Makefile | 22 --
po/cs.po | 436
po/cs_CZ.po | 431
po/de.po | 445 +
po/de_DE.po | 516
po/eject.pot | 91 -
po/es.po | 515
po/es_ES.po | 510
po/fr.po | 520 +
po/fr_FR.po | 515
Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)
Hi, On Fri, 01.08.2008 at 12:49:00 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + * added python-docutils (closes: #493205) + * suggests - recommends due to the high usability impact + * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatibilty issue with 1.3.9) Rejected. Don't use =, but Conflict with = 1.3.9 or whatever the correct version is. I'll do that, but I'll also have to upload a new package for python-webunit, which, by unfortunate circumstances, was uploaded in error by Mathias Klose with the wrong version number. Uploads will probably come in today. Kind regards, --Toni++ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: What to do with brasero?
Le vendredi 01 août 2008 à 12:56 +0200, Bastian Blank a écrit : On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: * Open a RC bug wrt. the FTBFS on alpha (why isn’t it open yet?) This have to be done anyway. The code is broken about the usage of the va_list type. Sure. I think I have the (trivial) fix now, but the question of whether uploading it at once and asking a freeze exception for it or simply removing the alpha builds holds. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Re: Please unblock eject/2.1.5+deb1-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi. Please allow eject into testing. It only contains a translation update and some very minor fixes, but due to me moving some files around in the .orig.tar.gz the debdiff is very huge. No objection - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkiTOfYACgkQLqiZQEml+FXYJgCfSEvqeAAh3fgbtcNjFGestSZL ungAmQGI9s0K/sX3MfZSFB71oZy0qOlG =dBCG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: policycoreutils 2.0.49-5
Russell Coker wrote: Please include version 2.0.49-5 in Lenny. The progress report is necessary to stop users getting confused and pushing reset on an autorelabel operation. It's uploaded to unstable now. Took till some time, though arrived by now. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What to do with brasero?
Josselin Mouette wrote: Le vendredi 01 août 2008 à 12:56 +0200, Bastian Blank a écrit : On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: * Open a RC bug wrt. the FTBFS on alpha (why isn’t it open yet?) This have to be done anyway. The code is broken about the usage of the va_list type. Sure. I think I have the (trivial) fix now, but the question of whether uploading it at once and asking a freeze exception for it or simply removing the alpha builds holds. Fixing it is preferred. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babel and illuminator
Greetings, I just uploaded a fixed babel package, version 1.2.0.dfsg-6, with one tiny change vs. -5 which closes bug 483324 and allows illuminator to build. Please unblock the new babel and old illuminator 0.11.0-1 (uploaded 3/24) so they can enter testing and the release. Thank you, -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Please unblock eject/2.1.5+deb1-1
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Hi. Please allow eject into testing. It only contains a translation update and some very minor fixes, but due to me moving some files around in the .orig.tar.gz the debdiff is very huge. I realize that me finally fixing the upstream tarball to make live of translators easier coinsided badly with the freeze, so if wanted I can upload only the debconf translation update to lenny-proposed-updates instead if wanted. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: babel and illuminator
Adam C Powell IV wrote: Greetings, I just uploaded a fixed babel package, version 1.2.0.dfsg-6, with one tiny change vs. -5 which closes bug 483324 and allows illuminator to build. Please unblock the new babel and old illuminator 0.11.0-1 (uploaded 3/24) so they can enter testing and the release. both unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing
I agree with Mikhail that all changes from 0.4.2 should appear in Lenny. I'm attaching complete debdiff and a debdiff without documentation/tests changes - the second one is not really that big and changes looks sane to me. -- :wq! sphinx.debdiff.gz Description: application/gunzip sphinx_code.debdiff.gz Description: application/gunzip pgpXvZK0Zk2bK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing
Piotr =?utf-8?Q?O=C5=BCarowski?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree with Mikhail that all changes from 0.4.2 should appear in Lenny. I'm attaching complete debdiff and a debdiff without documentation/tests changes - the second one is not really that big and changes looks sane to me. God, how hard is it to understand what No new upstream release means? Rejected. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 1: Multimedia funktioniert mit elektrischem Strom (Kristian Köhntopp) pgpqwc6H46zT0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Request for a exception for swfdec0.6
Hi! On tuesday after the freeze a bugfix version of swfdec0.6 was released, I uploaded it to unstable (priority=high, sorry about that, I hadn't read the freeze announcement). The new version is just a bugfix version and fixes several crashes, playing content which could be remote content, thus I believe this new version should be accepted on testing. I have made no changes on the packaging from the version currently on testing and this are the changes as descrived by upstream on the announcement of this version: -- Here is another bugfix release for the stable 0.6 series of Swfdec, the Free decoder/renderer for Adobe Flash animations. swfdec-0.6.8 (Mario Rush) http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/download/swfdec/0.6/swfdec-0.6.8.tar.gz MD5: 740caf52068556ffe151703342fb634b Changes: - fix a crash when decoding 1x1 JPEG images - fix a crash in XMLSocket.send - fix crashes when FLV decoding was aborted - fix a crash in exception handling code - fix some infinite loops with prototype loops - fix crasher when handling broken dates - fix crashers with native constructors found in testing - compatibility fixes: compile with gold linker, make includes work from C++ -- If you need any other info just ask for it. Regards... -- Manty/BestiaTester - http://manty.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
freeze exception for compiz
Hi,
the compiz packages had a broken dependency on libdecoration0, which
would break partial upgrades with compiz from bpo. I thought I fixed
this in 0.7.6-4 (uploaded before the freeze), but it turns out I didn't…
0.7.6-5 should be good to go; diff from 0.7.6-4 is at [0], debdiff from
the current testing version (0.7.6-3) follows.
Cheers,
Julien
[0]
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/app/compiz.git;a=commitdiff;h=d350c862cbdd18d0e05e13e6a2ca3ce232cf096b
diff -u compiz-0.7.6/debian/changelog compiz-0.7.6/debian/changelog
--- compiz-0.7.6/debian/changelog
+++ compiz-0.7.6/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+compiz (0.7.6-5) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Brown paper bag: remove shlibs.local and libdecoration0.shlibs, call
+dh_makeshlibs with the proper flags to actually fix dependencies on
+libdecoration0.
+
+ -- Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:57:30 +0200
+
+compiz (0.7.6-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Julien Cristau ]
+ * Bump libdecoration0 shlibs to = 0.7.6 (closes: #485775).
+
+ [ Sean Finney ]
+ * Include fix for posixly-incorrect usage of ENV (closes: #484225).
+
+ -- Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:44:51 +0200
+
compiz (0.7.6-3) unstable; urgency=high
* Add a versioned Replaces on older compiz-plugins to compiz-gtk, to prevent
reverted:
--- compiz-0.7.6/debian/libdecoration0.shlibs
+++ compiz-0.7.6.orig/debian/libdecoration0.shlibs
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-libdecoration 0 libdecoration0 (= 0.5.0)
diff -u compiz-0.7.6/debian/compiz-manager compiz-0.7.6/debian/compiz-manager
--- compiz-0.7.6/debian/compiz-manager
+++ compiz-0.7.6/debian/compiz-manager
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@
COMPIZ_OPTIONS=--ignore-desktop-hints --replace
COMPIZ_PLUGINS=
-ENV=
# Use emerald by default if it exist
USE_EMERALD=yes
@@ -282,27 +281,23 @@
build_env()
{
if check_nvidia; then
- ENV=__GL_YIELD=NOTHING
+ export __GL_YIELD=NOTHING
fi
if [ $INDIRECT = yes ]; then
- ENV=$ENV LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1
+ export LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1
fi
if check_xgl; then
if [ -f ${LIBGL_NVIDIA} ]; then
- ENV=$ENV LD_PRELOAD=${LIBGL_NVIDIA}
+ export LD_PRELOAD=${LD_PRELOAD:+${LD_PRELOAD}
}${LIBGL_NVIDIA}
verbose Enabling Xgl with nVidia drivers...\n
fi
if [ -f ${LIBGL_FGLRX} ]; then
- ENV=$ENV LD_PRELOAD=${LIBGL_FGLRX}
+ export LD_PRELOAD=${LD_PRELOAD:+${LD_PRELOAD}
}${LIBGL_FGLRX}
verbose Enabling Xgl with fglrx ATi drivers...\n
fi
fi
- ENV=$ENV FROM_WRAPPER=yes
-
- if [ -n $ENV ]; then
- export $ENV
- fi
+ export FROM_WRAPPER=yes
}
build_args()
reverted:
--- compiz-0.7.6/debian/shlibs.local
+++ compiz-0.7.6.orig/debian/shlibs.local
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-libdecoration 0 libdecoration0 (= 0.5.0)
diff -u compiz-0.7.6/debian/rules compiz-0.7.6/debian/rules
--- compiz-0.7.6/debian/rules
+++ compiz-0.7.6/debian/rules
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
dh_strip
dh_compress
dh_fixperms
- dh_makeshlibs
+ dh_makeshlibs -plibdecoration0 -V'libdecoration0 (= 0.7.6)'
dh_shlibdeps
dh_installdeb
dh_gencontrol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unblocking partman-multipath
* Otavio Salvador [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:58:19 -0300]: Guido Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've ported the necessary patches from 1.9 + the Debian specific parts over to Debian's 1.8: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/agx/parted1.8.git;a=summary Patch looks OK. It is not invassive but due the new attribute on LinuxSpecific we'll have a different ABI. RT would be acceptable for you to have this mini transition now? That is the last missing part to fully support multipath on d-i. Mini transition of what? libparted1.8-9 - libparted1.8-10? Since the 1.8 transition itself hasn't happened yet (any news about that, Otavio?), I guess we could squeeze it in, but... please assess: is the patch safe at this stage for the installer? Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org When all is summed up, a man never speaks of himself without loss; his accusations of himself are always believed; his praises never. -- Michel de Montaigne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openal-soft hppa giveback
* Domenico Andreoli [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:35:57 +0200]: gb openal-soft_1:1.4.272-1 . hppa just built and uploaded Sorry to have forgot about your last message to me... Err, please don't upload hand-build packages if possible! It would have most likely succeeded on the buildd as well, but it's important that we have some confidence that buildds are able to build our packages... Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org The problem I have with making an intelligent statement is that some people then think that it's not an isolated occurrance. -- Simon Travaglia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing
[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2008-08-01] Piotr =?utf-8?Q?O=C5=BCarowski?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree with Mikhail that all changes from 0.4.2 should appear in Lenny. I'm attaching complete debdiff and a debdiff without documentation/tests changes - the second one is not really that big and changes looks sane to me. God, how hard is it to understand what No new upstream release means? Rejected. [no sarcasm, just a question] Is it a general rule? The no new upstream release one?. I plan to upload sqlalchemy 0.4.7p1-1 with 3 lines of code changed soon[1]. Do I really have to prepare 0.4.7-2 with changes moved from upstream sources to debian/patches? What does it change (besides avoiding big debdiff due to lots of date stamps in documentation / new regression test files)? If it's not a general rule, what's a sane debdiff size? [1] I'm waiting for 0.4.7-1 to propagate to testing -- :wq! pgpCbZoRSkHVD.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: How should I handle the sitation with releaseforge?
* Roberto C. Sánchez [Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:41:01 -0400]: what is the procedure to have it removed? File an RC bug against the package? For removals from testing only, yes, plus a message to -release asking for a removal, with a mention of the bug number. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org I promise you. Once I enter into an exclusive relationship, I sleep with very few people. -- Denny Crane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: freeze exception for compiz
* Julien Cristau [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:02:28 +0200]: Hi, the compiz packages had a broken dependency on libdecoration0, which would break partial upgrades with compiz from bpo. I thought I fixed this in 0.7.6-4 (uploaded before the freeze), but it turns out I didn't… 0.7.6-5 should be good to go; diff from 0.7.6-4 is at [0], debdiff from the current testing version (0.7.6-3) follows. Unblocked. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org - I love you, Shirley, I'm not ashamed to say. - If you love me, then you'll want me to be happy. Even if I'm not with you. - I don't love you *that* much. -- Denny Crane and Shirley Schmidt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How should I handle the sitation with releaseforge?
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:36:49PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Roberto C. Sánchez [Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:41:01 -0400]: what is the procedure to have it removed? File an RC bug against the package? For removals from testing only, yes, plus a message to -release asking for a removal, with a mention of the bug number. #492933 Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: How should I handle the sitation with releaseforge?
* Roberto C. Sánchez [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:40:46 -0400]: On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:36:49PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Roberto C. Sánchez [Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:41:01 -0400]: what is the procedure to have it removed? File an RC bug against the package? For removals from testing only, yes, plus a message to -release asking for a removal, with a mention of the bug number. #492933 Removed... -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Joaquín Sabina - Besos de Judas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Allow debian-edu-install to propagate to testing
[Pierre Habouzit] unblocked Great. I am not sure it was enough. The message now reads: 5 days old (needed 5 days) Not touching package, as requested by freeze (contact debian-release if update is needed) Not considered Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unblocking partman-multipath
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mini transition of what? libparted1.8-9 - libparted1.8-10? Since the 1.8 transition itself hasn't happened yet (any news about that, Otavio?), I guess we could squeeze it in, but... please assess: is the patch safe at this stage for the installer? Yes. libparted1.8-9 - libparted1.8-10. Parted is ready on sid. I've uploaded it and the bug reporter confirmed it works. (#488374) I'd say to migrate it all and do this mini transition on sid. Most of packages are from d-i team and few from outside but binNMU should handle them. The patch itself is very specific and I'd do tests to avoid it breaking any stuff. Anyway I'd like to do that ASAP to get testing from dailies and be sure of that. This depends on RT decision about the ABI bump. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing
* Piotr Ożarowski [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:33:44 +0200]: Hello, [no sarcasm, just a question] Is it a general rule? The no new upstream release one?. I plan to upload sqlalchemy 0.4.7p1-1 with 3 lines of code changed soon[1]. Do I really have to prepare 0.4.7-2 with changes moved from upstream sources to debian/patches? What does it change (besides avoiding big debdiff due to lots of date stamps in documentation / new regression test files)? If it's not a general rule, what's a sane debdiff size? Well, if a new upstream version would be source-equivalent to a backported version, then of course the new upstream version is ok. The thing is that it shouldn't include stuff that would not be allowed in a backported version. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence. -- Dijkstra -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please allow xmms2tray back into Lenny
I've just had an NMU to fix #479024 uploaded to Sid: package contains compiled python code http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479024 That was the only RC bug open on the package. Scott K signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Request for a exception for swfdec0.6
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: Hi! On tuesday after the freeze a bugfix version of swfdec0.6 was released, I uploaded it to unstable (priority=high, sorry about that, I hadn't read the freeze announcement). The new version is just a bugfix version and fixes several crashes, playing content which could be remote content, thus I believe this new version should be accepted on testing. I have made no changes on the packaging from the version currently on testing and this are the changes as descrived by upstream on the announcement of this version: Diff looks fine. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openal-soft hppa giveback
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:33:34PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Domenico Andreoli [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:35:57 +0200]: gb openal-soft_1:1.4.272-1 . hppa just built and uploaded Sorry to have forgot about your last message to me... Err, please don't upload hand-build packages if possible! It would have most likely succeeded on the buildd as well, but it's important that we have some confidence that buildds are able to build our packages... right, I usually try to help building those too far from the tip to be picked in a reasonable time, which maybe are waiting only for the hppa build.. but nowdays hppa buildds are rocking :) cheers, Domenico -[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes: Piotr =?utf-8?Q?O=C5=BCarowski?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree with Mikhail that all changes from 0.4.2 should appear in Lenny. I'm attaching complete debdiff and a debdiff without documentation/tests changes - the second one is not really that big and changes looks sane to me. God, how hard is it to understand what No new upstream release means? Rejected. I didn't look at these specific changes, but the No new upstream release seems to be a bit too dogmatic in some cases. Just freezing at some point of time without giving packages depending on just uploaded packages to catch up doesn't serve the usability as well. As an example (where all packages already are in testing) would be the recent subversion upload (1.5), followed by depending upstreams offering subversion 1.5 compatibility. pysvn was released and uploaded in time before the freeze, but even for a pysvn release after the freeze I would have asked for an exception. We already have a distinction for freezing essential toolchain, toolchain, and other. Maybe we have to differentiate the other packages. Again, I didn't look at the sphinx changes, but it appears that the update is needed to properly build the documentation. sphinx is only needed to build docs; would it be possible to reconsider the decision if the package maintainer shows that all packages build-depending on sphinx still build with the new version? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
heimdal
Hello, Heimdal in unstable (1.2.dfsg.1-2) needs to get pushed through to testing/lenny. The testing version 1.1-3: * contains non-free RFC documents (no bug report opened). * supposedly solved version symbols (#453241 http://bugs.debian.org/453241) on AMD64, unfortunately it appears the solution provided by upstream was broken and broke versioned symbols all architectures (#492427) http://bugs.debian.org/492427. Version 1.2.dfsg.1-1 which was in unstable until recently: * Fixes the non-free RFC documents issue. * Was in unstable for over a month with no problems detected except #492427 http://bugs.debian.org/492427. * Not sure why it didn't get into testing, although I am somewhat curious now. The release critical bug wasn't filled until rather late (about the same time as the freeze). Version 1.2.dfsg.1-2 now in unstable: * It fixes (at least it looks fixed to me) the release critical issue with versioned library symbols not working (#492427) http://bugs.debian.org/492427 and also adds debconf translations (#491767). http://bugs.debian.org/491767 * I solved this by overriding the configure check to always return true, because I believe all Debian platforms support versioned symbols. * It would be good if I could get somebody to independently verify that the versioned library symbols really are working (it looks good to me). * Unfortunately every package that is linked against the buggy Heimdal libraries must also be rebuilt, I am not sure how to arrange this though. So yes, this is a new upstream version compared with testing, however it was available for a long time in unstable, and I think it is the safest way of having a releasable package in testing/lenny. Thanks Brian May heimdal http://packages.debian.org/src:heimdal (1.2.dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix library version symbols. Again. Closes: #492427 http://bugs.debian.org/492427. * Install swedish (sv) debconf translations from #491767. Closes: #483764 http://bugs.debian.org/483764, #491767 http://bugs.debian.org/491767. -- Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:11:57 +1000 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unblock httrack
Hi Could you please unblock this package, it fixes a security issue[0]. The unstable version is a new upstream version, but the changes are trivial. It includes the security patch and some changes to .desktop file and so on. I think it should migrate now, instead of going through testing-security. Cheers Steffen [0]: http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/TEMP-000-000167 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
please unblock opensc
Hi The opensc package in sid fixes CVE-2008-2235[0] and the changes are trivial (security fix, typo fix, standards version change). Please unblock it so it can go straight into lenny. Cheers Steffen [0]: http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-2235 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
libselinux-2.0.65-4
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493316 Please allow libselinux-2.0.65-4 (which I have just uploaded to unstable) into Lenny to close the above bug. There is a one-line change which is what Josselin suggested in a response to the bug. This is necessary for operation of the audit2why program which will hopefully significantly increase the usability of SE Linux for newbies. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Blog http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.html Sponsoring Free Software development -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
