Please unblock manpages-pl/20060617-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Could you please allow manpages-pl/20060617-2 to propagate to testing? The package contains documentation only, it's almost 20 days old and fixes a few outstanding bugs and a bunch of lintian (or in fact lexgrog) warnings, what increased quality of the man pages, but made diff longer and possibly harder to review. Since the previous version (20060617-1) of the package included empty diff.gz, the Debian Patch Tracking page at http://patch-tracking.debian.net/package/manpages-pl/20060617-2 contains all the patches introduced in the latest version. You might find it easier to review the changes with the page (anyway, most of them either one-liners fixes for invalid nroff tags, e.g. [1] or multi-line fixes for invalid comments, e.g. [2]; there's a one exception - the acct page [3], whose translation was partially updated). [1] http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/misc/view/manpages-pl/20060617-2/man1/mcedit.1 [2] http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/misc/view/manpages-pl/20060617-2/man1/perl.1 [3] http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/misc/view/manpages-pl/20060617-2/man5/acct.5 Changelog: manpages-pl (20060617-2) unstable; urgency=low * Remove man pages for chkfontpath (closes: #501032) and pwauth (LP#275990). * Correct acct(5) and chmod(1) translations (closes: #407723, #506205). * Fix typo in gawk(1). * Don't install linda override files (lintian). * Add `set -e' to postinst scripts (lintian). * Various man pages: fix `manpage-has-errors-from-man' lintian warnings. * Set debhelper compat level to 7. * Standards-Version: 3.8.0. -- Robert Luberda Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:17:18 +0100 Regards, Robert -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklr0PwACgkQThh1cJ0wnDttkwCfZDcSjTWvTrXIwzViIBff4+oL YYAAn0boIEU2dW/Ga70iENhJLtrGr6lG =R4MR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: This won't get fixed for lenny
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:08:49PM +, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 07:39:01PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > Hi Neil, > > > > As Rob pointed out there's a serious regression, and I plan to fix it really > > soon. So please remove the lenny-ignore tag. > > > > I'll believe it when I see it :) > > This has been 'fixed' many times, and it seems to be non-trivial. If we > *do* end up with a fix, that'll be great; the RC bug gets closed (yay!). Well, I was going to fix the regression, not the bug completely. > If not, I don't want to delay the release over it as we'll be putting it > in the release notes (#511440). Please don't put it in the release notes yet. I'm fixing this really soon, probably tomorrow. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: This won't get fixed for lenny
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 07:39:01PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:10:58PM +, Neil McGovern wrote: > > tags 239111 +lenny-ignore > > tags 243835 +lenny-ignore > > tags 246111 +lenny-ignore > > tags 309218 +lenny-ignore > > tags 425367 +lenny-ignore > > thanks > > > > The grub + XFS issues are long standing and complicated go fix. This > > means that they're not going to get fixed in time for lenny. Hence > > adding lenny-ignore tags > > Hi Neil, > > As Rob pointed out there's a serious regression, and I plan to fix it really > soon. So please remove the lenny-ignore tag. > I'll believe it when I see it :) This has been 'fixed' many times, and it seems to be non-trivial. If we *do* end up with a fix, that'll be great; the RC bug gets closed (yay!). If not, I don't want to delay the release over it as we'll be putting it in the release notes (#511440). However, ccing -release so a RM can override my decision if they want. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
request for simple-cdd freeze exception
i intend to upload a version of simple-cdd that works with the recent debian-cd
upload targeted for lenny. a diff of planned changes is attached.
please review if it would be acceptible for a freeze exception.
simple-cdd (0.3.9) unstable; urgency=low
* depend on debian-cd >= 3.1.0
* update task and exclude handling to support newer versions of debian-cd.
* set MAXISOS and MAXJIGDOS used in newer versions of debian-cd.
* only download installer when DI_WWW_HOME is not set, as debian-cd will
handle it.
* fix BOOT_TIMEOUT parameter.
* debian/control: use proper Vcs-* header.
* update architecture specific kernel selection.
* ensure that relevent linux-image-2.6-* packages are also installed, as
changes to linux-image metapackages do not pull in linux-image-2.6-* by
default, which causes debian-installer to ask which kernel to install.
* exit if being run as root. add --force-root commandline option to override.
* profile updates:
- ltsp:
+ include commented out example to enable DHCP server
+ remove packages no longer needed
- vserver:
+ ensure that a vserver capable kernel is installed
+ install util-vserver and debootstrap by default
+ lower vserver-debiantools to an optional package
-- Vagrant Cascadian Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:42:44 -0800
live well,
vagrant
=== modified file 'build-simple-cdd'
--- build-simple-cdd 2008-06-20 17:56:35 +
+++ build-simple-cdd 2009-01-12 20:14:04 +
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
--help|-h display this help
--qemu|-q use qemu to test the image
--force-preseed only issue a warning if a preseeding file is invalid
+--force-root allow running as root
--profiles-udeb-dist pull simple-cdd-profiles udeb from other distribution
--extra-udeb-dist also pull in udebs from specified distribution
--require-optional-packages fail if missing optional packages (*.downloads)
@@ -94,6 +95,7 @@
--extra-udeb-dist) extra_udeb_dist="$2"
shift ;;
--require-optional-packages) export require_optional_packages="true" ;;
+--force-root) force_root="true" ;;
*) get_help "ERROR: unknown commandline option: $1" > /dev/stderr
exit 1 ;;
esac
@@ -157,6 +159,10 @@
# get defaults, and have build profiles over-ride all others
get_config default $profiles $build_profiles
+if [ "$force_root" != "true" ] && [ "$UID" = "0" ]; then
+ die "Running as root is strongly discouraged. please run as a non-root user."
+fi
+
test -z "$server" && server="ftp.us.debian.org"
test -z "$debian_mirror" && debian_mirror="ftp://$server/debian/";
test -z "$wget_debian_mirror" && wget_debian_mirror="$debian_mirror"
@@ -200,6 +206,7 @@
test -z "$MAXCDS" && export MAXCDS=1
test -z "$OMIT_RELEASE_NOTES" && export OMIT_RELEASE_NOTES=1
test -z "$DOJIGDO" && export DOJIGDO="0"
+test -z "$MAXJIGDOS" && export MAXJIGDOS="0"
export MIRROR="$simple_cdd_mirror"
export BASEDIR="$simple_cdd_basedir"
@@ -221,7 +228,9 @@
debian-cd)
test -z "$debian_cd_dir" && debian_cd_dir="/usr/share/debian-cd"
# set include files for debian-cd
-test -z "$includes" && includes="$BASEDIR/tasks/debian-installer+kernel-$CODENAME $BASEDIR/tasks/debian-installer-$CODENAME $BASEDIR/tasks/base-$CODENAME"
+test -z "$includes" && includes="debian-installer+kernel debian-installer"
+# ensure that ISO images are built
+test -z "$MAXISOS" && export MAXISOS="ALL"
;;
esac
done
@@ -304,12 +313,17 @@
done
if [ -z "$kernel_packages" ]; then
-# FIXME: add appropriate kernels for other architectures.
-for a in $ARCHES ; do
-case $a in
-i386) kernel_packages="$kernel_packages linux-image-486" ;;
-*) kernel_packages="$kernel_packages linux-image-$a" ;;
-esac
+# guess appropriate kernel for architectures
+for kernel_base in linux-image- linux-image-2.6- ; do
+for a in $ARCHES ; do
+case $a in
+i386) kernel_packages="$kernel_packages ${kernel_base}486" ;;
+powerpc|amd64|s390) kernel_packages="$kernel_packages ${kernel_base}$a" ;;
+alpha) kernel_packages="$kernel_packages ${kernel_base}alpha-generic" ;;
+sparc) kernel_packages="$kernel_packages ${kernel_base}sparc64" ;;
+*) echo "WARNING: unable to guess kernel for architecture: $a" ;;
+esac
+done
done
fi
@@ -372,7 +386,7 @@
mkdir -p $BASEDIR
if [ "true" = "$do_mirror" ] || [ -z "$do_mirror" ] ; then
-if [ -z "$custom_installer" ]; then
+if [ -z "$custom_installer" ] && [ -z "$DI_WWW_HOME" ]; then
# add d-i files for each architecture
for a in $ARCHES ; do
case $a in
=== modified file 'debian/control'
--- debian/control 2008-10-31 22:19:34 +
+++ debian/control 2009-01-12 18:55:28 +
@@ -4,12 +4,12 @@
Maintainer: Vagrant Cascadian
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.22),
Re: stable update for Moinmoin (bugs 511416 and 504562)
Hello, I have a attached patch that address two serious usability issues in moinmoin wiki (which happens to run on wiki.d.o ... where we had complaints from users). The changes are explained in the mail I sent to the maintainer: On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 04:45 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:54:54PM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > >First of all, I would like to wish you a happy new year. > > >I am wondering about a stable-proposed-update for Etch's moinmoin. > >There are two bugs that seriously affects the usability. The patchs > >are non-intrusive: > > > >* #511416: Fix the forgotten password email login URL. > > End-user that request a copy of their password will be sent an email > > with a hash of their password. However, the URL points to the > > account create page, instead of the login page. > > > >* #504562: the title "Table of contents" is broken for all Spanish > > speaking user. It also fixes the link to the help pages > > (HelpContents), so it actually points to the Spanish version. > > > >I would finalize the patches if a s-p-u upload is ok for you. > > IT seems to me that even though both those issues are highly annoying > they are not security-related. Would this change be accepted, if we were to upload a new package to stable-proposed-updates ? Thanks in advance, Franklin moin_1.5.3-1.2etch2.patch Description: application/mbox
Please unblock and give back amarok 1.4.10-2
Hello, please unblock amarok 1.4.10-2. It fixes security issue. please giveback amarok on arm (to the faster buildd) as previous attempt failed with the typical shlibdeps timeout. -- Modestas Vainius signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Please unblock debian-cd
(Resend with proper address for the list.) Hi, I've just uploaded a new version of debian-cd which will be used to build CD images for Lenny, so please unblock debian-cd/3.1.0 As the new version contains a few structural changes to improve support for installing various desktop environments [1], packages that use debian-cd may now be broken. You can therefore also expect an update very soon of simple-cdd, which will also be targeted at Lenny. We may do one more upload of debian-cd after D-I RC2 has been released, but that should have only relatively minor changes. Cheers, FJP [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/01/msg2.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: seeking lenny pre-approval for possible NMU of openjdk-6
* Matthias Klose [Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:13:36 +0100]: > Luk Claes schrieb: > > Bernhard R. Link wrote: > >> Could this get an freeze-exception in this form? (Assuming it can > >> go via unstable[1]) > > Yes. > > Please contact us again when uploaded. > please fix #510972 at the same time. this is rev 1232 in the IcedTea > repository. Not sure if Bernhard is following -release or #508650. Explicitly CC'ing him just in case. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org - You look beaten. - I just caught Tara laughing with another man. - Are you sure they weren't just... kissing or something? - No, they were laughing. -- Denny Crane and Alan Shore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: security issue bumps
* Thijs Kinkhorst [Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:56:24 +0100]: > Hi, > Can you please bump urgency of these openssl-related fixes: > ntp/1:4.2.4p4+dfsg-8 > openssl/0.9.8g-15 Both bumped to 5 days, should go in tonight or tomorrow morning. > The following are in TPU, so I guess you are aware of them, but as a > reminder that they fix security issues: > xine-lib/1.1.14-4 Very young, still missing lots of builds. > mysql-dfsg-5.0/5.0.51a-21 ia64 & hppa missing for 3 days, prodded the relevant people. Thanks, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Alanis Morissette - You oughta know II -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: FAI 3.2.16 fixes a critical bug
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:31:10PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote: > Please unblock FAI 3.2.16, which fixes a critical bug (#511391) and > includes some documentation patches. Unblocked. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#508114: jack-audio-connection-kit: Uploading new version to fix alpha FTBFS
Reinhard Tartler writes: > could you please reconsider jack 0.116.0? [...] we have discussed the matter a bit further on the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list. It turns out that the version 0.116 has been tested now for quite some time by various people. Please consider Free's posts at [1,2]. http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2009-January/002439.html http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2009-January/002441.html -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
FAI 3.2.16 fixes a critical bug
Please unblock FAI 3.2.16, which fixes a critical bug (#511391) and includes some documentation patches. -- regards Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: please unblock mailman/2:2.1.11-9
On Wed, January 7, 2009 16:10, Adeodato Simó wrote: >> Please unblock mailman/2:2.1.11-9. > Ok, unblocked. > (This hunk seems redundant, since .version is included in the .deb Thanks, removed it. >> BTW, builds are missing for alpha and sparc, even though both have > Only alpha missing now. Can you follow-up in 3 or 4 days if it hasn't > been uploaded by then? It's still missing... thanks. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
security issue bumps
Hi, Can you please bump urgency of these openssl-related fixes: ntp/1:4.2.4p4+dfsg-8 openssl/0.9.8g-15 The following are in TPU, so I guess you are aware of them, but as a reminder that they fix security issues: mysql-dfsg-5.0/5.0.51a-21 xine-lib/1.1.14-4 thanks, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: sarg: please allow transition to lenny
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:44:39AM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote: > There is no patch system in sarg packaging. debian/patches is there just > to keep track of all the patches that have been applied. I'm going to > restructure the packaging as soon as lenny is released, but the binary > packages will be mostly the same as this version, just a little more > maintainable. :-) > Unblocked Neil -- 'Maybe you can try to find a nice hotel by shouting in the Mexico DF streets "where could a gringo find a decent hotel in this dirty third world lame excuse for a country?". I'm sure the people will rush to help you, as we south americans love to be called third world in a demeaning way.' signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Unblock Easytag
Hi, I just noticed that Easytag has an "Unblock request by freeze-exception ignored due to version mismatch". It seems that there was an unblock request for version 2.1.4-1, but since the last NMU, there is a version mismatch and easytag can't make it to Lenny. Since there has been only an NMU closing a bug, I was wondering if you could consider updating the unblock request to 2.1.4-1.1. It would be a shame if Easytag was not in Lenny. Regards, Bertrand
Re: please unblock tau/2.16.4-1.2
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:34:22AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
>>please unblock tau/2.16.4-1.2
>
>tau has been removed from lenny over 9 months ago.
The previous tau version that was removed from testing was 2.16.4-1 and
its corresponding source package is available at
http://snapshot.debian.net/package/tau
>Also, actually describing reasons to unblock a package is a requirement
>when requesting a freeze exception.
The interdiff between 2.16.4-1 and 2.16.4-1.2 is minimal and it only
closes three RC bugs: 458874 476638 and 417725
interdiff -zp1 tau_2.16.4-1.diff.gz tau_2.16.4-1.2.diff.gz
diff -u tau-2.16.4/debian/changelog tau-2.16.4/debian/changelog
--- tau-2.16.4/debian/changelog
+++ tau-2.16.4/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+tau (2.16.4-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/rules: explicitly set -arch parameter with configure, some
+architectures are not recognised properly (Closes: #458874, #476638).
+
+ -- Luca Falavigna Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:19:37 +0200
+
+tau (2.16.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix FTBFS with GCC 4.3 (Closes: #417725).
+
+ -- Luk Claes Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:49:56 +
+
tau (2.16.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release, orig tarball cleaned up.
diff -u tau-2.16.4/debian/rules tau-2.16.4/debian/rules
--- tau-2.16.4/debian/rules
+++ tau-2.16.4/debian/rules
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
stamps/build-arch:
dh_testdir
- ./configure -prefix=${taudir} $(CONFIGFLAGS)
+ ./configure -prefix=${taudir} -arch=$(CPU) $(CONFIGFLAGS)
# Fix permissions
chmod -x ${taudir}/include/Profile/TulipThreadLayer.h
diff -u tau-2.16.4/.all_configs tau-2.16.4/.all_configs
--- tau-2.16.4/.all_configs
+++ tau-2.16.4/.all_configs
@@ -3,0 +4,5 @@
+ -arch=default
+ -prefix=/home/tau-2.16.4/debian/BUILD/usr/lib/tau -pthread -LINUXTIMERS
+ -arch=default
+ -prefix=/home/tau-2.16.4/debian/BUILD/usr/lib/tau -pthread -LINUXTIMERS
+ -arch=default
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tau-2.16.4.orig/utils/tau_platforms.h
+++ tau-2.16.4/utils/tau_platforms.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#define TAUERRNO errno
# endif // SOL2CC
+#define TAU_DOT_H_LESS_HEADERS
#ifdef TAU_DOT_H_LESS_HEADERS
# include
# include
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tau-2.16.4.orig/utils/tau_events.cpp
+++ tau-2.16.4/utils/tau_events.cpp
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
# define F_EXISTS0
+#define TAU_DOT_H_LESS_HEADERS
#ifdef TAU_DOT_H_LESS_HEADERS
#include
#include
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tau-2.16.4.orig/src/Profile/Profiler.cpp
+++ tau-2.16.4/src/Profile/Profiler.cpp
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
#if (!defined(TAU_WINDOWS))
#include
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tau-2.16.4.orig/src/Profile/PthreadLayer.cpp
+++ tau-2.16.4/src/Profile/PthreadLayer.cpp
@@ -34,9 +34,11 @@
//#define DEBUG_PROF
#ifdef TAU_DOT_H_LESS_HEADERS
+#include
#include
using namespace std;
#else /* TAU_DOT_H_LESS_HEADERS */
+#include
#include
#endif /* TAU_DOT_H_LESS_HEADERS */
#include "Profile/Profiler.h"
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tau-2.16.4.orig/src/Profile/UserEvent.cpp
+++ tau-2.16.4/src/Profile/UserEvent.cpp
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
typedef unsigned long long x_uint64;
#endif
-
+#include
#include
#include
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tau-2.16.4.orig/src/Profile/TauHooks.cpp
+++ tau-2.16.4/src/Profile/TauHooks.cpp
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
// Include Files
//
+#include
#include
#include
#include
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#508114: jack-audio-connection-kit: Uploading new version to fix alpha FTBFS
Hi Luk, hi debian-release, Free Ekanayaka writes: > |--==> On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:32:47 +0100, Luk Claes said: > >>The new version is 100% backward compatible, as a matter of fact there > >>were no changes in the lib's API or ABI, just a lot of fixes in the > >>code of the *jackd* server, which is built from the same sources. > > LC> Well, it's still way too much to review, so we would prefer a targeted > LC> fix to be uploaded to testing-proposed-updates. > > I understand your position. But if this can help changing your mind, > please note that the 0.116.1 jack package in sid has been tested by > several 64 Studio [0] users running lenny/sid and reports have all > been positive. > > It would be a real pity to release lenny with the buggy 0.109.0, > again, the upstream developers deprecate it: > > "I am happy to announce the release of JACK 0.116.0. This is an > important release, because it fixes all the problems reported with > 0.115.6 and now makes 0.109.2 completely obsolete. Nobody should be > using 0.109.2 within a few weeks, and even that is only to allow for > distributions to update." [1] could you please reconsider jack 0.116.0? According to [1], upstream suggests that "nobody should be using 0.109.2", the version we currently have in testing. Moreover it would really help packages like xine-lib and others (58 packages in total) that build-depend on libjack-dev to migrate to testing. If you are stating clearly that you reject the new upstream version, we can consider reverting the package in unstable. However this would be, as explained above, against upstream's suggestion.. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
