Re: NetworkManager testing migration
* Michael Biebl [Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:03:40 +0200]: Hi! Hello! Adeodato Simó schrieb: As you very well explain, gnome-main-menu also provides the libslab0 library, so gnome-main-menu can’t be just removed from testing to allow for this transition to happen, since that would render gnome-control-center uninstallable. Philipp said on IRC, that a partial removal of gnome-main-menu was possible, i.e. keep the binary packages libslab(0,-dev), which have no libnm-util dependencies and only remove the binary package gnome-main-menu. He also advised to contact debian-release about that. I guess I should have mentioned that ;-) That’s a very, very gross hack (because it’s not supported in britney proper), and I’d rather not do it unless the status of things start becoming unacceptable. Julian, given that the gnome-main-menu has acknowledged somebody taking over maintenance of the package, can you give us an estimate date for an upload of 0.9.12? Thanks!, -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Jack Audio Connection Kit transition
* Felipe Sateler [Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:58:23 +1100]: * plan for libjack0.100.0-0: there are 11 source packages left with dependencies on this old library. No sourceful uploads are needed for this: once you’ve gotten back to me that the plan is good, I will provide you with a list of packages and schedule Bin-NMUs; then you can do some work of checking if they built successfully everywhere, filing bugs, etc. Once all of them have been rebuilt (which will make them depend on libjack0), please check with us that they’ve migrated to testing, and at that point libjack0.100.0-0 can be dropped. Sounds good? Amsynth will require a sourceful upload, since the dependency is not generated by dpkg-shlibdeps because it dlopens libjack. It is the only one I saw. I’ve scheduled Bin-NMUs for this, for all packages except amsynth. You can check for build-failures here: http://bit.ly/zLyiK, and for progress of their migration here: https://buildd.debian.org/transitions/summary.html. As mentioned above, please check with us before dropping the libjack0.100.0-0 package. Cheers, -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: vtk built with ccache
Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca (06/04/2009): I expect that a binary NMU for amd64 will solve the problem. The -dev package is Architecture: all, so you'll need a sourceful upload AFAICT. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
OCaml 3.11 is in testing!
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:33:29PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
I guess migrating ocaml to testing can now be considered...
This is now done:
ocaml | 3.11.0-5 | testing
ocaml | 3.11.0-5 | unstable
Congratulations for making of this transition one of the less painful
I’ve ever had to deal with
YAY \o/
Thanks to you -release-rs, I suggest adding the above lines to the CV
of all Debian OCaml-ers which contributed to this transition ;-)
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...| ..: | Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#521726: python-pymtp: needs upating of depends fromlibmtp7 to libmtp8
* Rafael Laboissiere [Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:52:28 +0200]: Thanks, I see it is already there: http://packages.debian.org/source/testing/libmtp I am just curious, why there was no mail notification generated by Debian testing watch? Testing watch mails are sent out once a day (at 16h UTC). The transition just missed it by a couple hours, so it’ll get sent in today’s run. Phil, is it cheap enough that we could run it after each dinstall? Otherwise, I think it is safe to upload libmtp_0.3.7-2 to unstable now, isn't it? Version 0.3.7-1 has been in experimental since a while. Yes. -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#521726: python-pymtp: needs upating of depends fromlibmtp7 to libmtp8
* Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es [2009-04-05 21:53]: * Rafael Laboissiere [Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:21:51 +0200]: Done: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2009/04/msg00251.html Thanks, I pushed the transition now. Thanks, I see it is already there: http://packages.debian.org/source/testing/libmtp I am just curious, why there was no mail notification generated by Debian testing watch? Otherwise, I think it is safe to upload libmtp_0.3.7-2 to unstable now, isn't it? Version 0.3.7-1 has been in experimental since a while. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#521726: python-pymtp: needs upating of depends fromlibmtp7 to libmtp8
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:58:43PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: Testing watch mails are sent out once a day (at 16h UTC). The transition just missed it by a couple hours, so it’ll get sent in today’s run. Phil, is it cheap enough that we could run it after each dinstall? In order not to spam the list I adjusted the footer to state the fact that it's only run once a day. I don't think we want one mail per dinstall. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[SRM] Possible update for nss
Hi,
Bug #509930 makes nss crash on sparc (as reported on our BTS) and ia64
(as reported upstream). It has the bad side effect to make iceweasel and
anything using nss OCSP check. I'm currently uploading a fix to unstable,
but I think it would be a good thing to have this fix in stable, too.
You'll find the (small) patch below. It comes from upstream, as stated
in the changelog, and is safe, as the structure is purely internal to
the library.
What do you think?
Mike
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 90aa93d..de4ba65 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+nss (3.12.0-6) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * mozilla/security/nss/lib/libpkix/pkix_pl_nss/system/pkix_pl_object.h:
+Apply patch from upstream to fix alignment issues on sparc and ia64.
+Closes: #509930.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey gland...@debian.org Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:21:52 +0200
+
nss (3.12.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
diff --git
a/mozilla/security/nss/lib/libpkix/pkix_pl_nss/system/pkix_pl_object.h
b/mozilla/security/nss/lib/libpkix/pkix_pl_nss/system/pkix_pl_object.h
index 872f169..b683fec 100755
--- a/mozilla/security/nss/lib/libpkix/pkix_pl_nss/system/pkix_pl_object.h
+++ b/mozilla/security/nss/lib/libpkix/pkix_pl_nss/system/pkix_pl_object.h
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ extern C {
/* PKIX_PL_Object Structure Definition */
struct PKIX_PL_ObjectStruct {
-PKIX_UInt32 magicHeader;
+PRUint64magicHeader;
PKIX_UInt32 type;
PKIX_Int32 references;
PRLock *lock;
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [SRM] Possible update for nss
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:48:15PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Hi, Bug #509930 makes nss crash on sparc (as reported on our BTS) and ia64 (as reported upstream). It has the bad side effect to make iceweasel and anything using nss OCSP check. I'm currently uploading a fix to unstable, ^ word missing here: crash. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: ImageMagick libs transition
* Nelson A. de Oliveira [Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:39:10 -0300]: Perfect! We are going to wait for the green light. Green light for unstable! -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock openssl
Hi, Can openssl 0.9.8g-16 be hinted to testing? It fixes a security issue. It has a udeb. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
