Re: Proposed debdiff for stable package slim
Mike Massonnet wrote: Hello, Hi Regarding bug #529306, there is a possible detection of the xauth magic-cookie. The attached debdiff file adds two patches to the current slim package in Lenny. The first that instead of setting the mcookie within the command line of xauth, it passes it through a pipe. The second that instead of using the pid+time to generate a random mcookie, uses srandom to make the cookie less predictable. Please upload. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: update subversion-tools in stable
Peter Palfrader wrote:
Hi,
Subversion-tools in lenny contains a commit email script, which
unfortunately sends broken mails (all the headers are part of the body,
and the headers empty).
Bugs #532903 and #508301 are about this issue, which has been fixed for
sid+squeeze in late February.
wea...@intrepid:~/tmp$ cat ./subversion-1.5.6dfsg/debian/patches/commit-email2
Fix commit-email.pl header formatting - properly omit the envelope
'From ' when not --stdout. From upstream trunk r34134. Bug #508301.
--- a/tools/hook-scripts/commit-email.pl.in
+++ b/tools/hook-scripts/commit-email.pl.in
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@
my @head;
my $formatted_date;
-if (defined $stdout)
+if ($stdout)
{
$formatted_date = strftime('%a %b %e %X %Y', localtime());
push(@head, From $mail_from $formatted_date\n);
This is the same patch I wrote independently when I filed #532903. The
maintainer states that this fix is trivial and obviously correct, and
it does what I expect on the system where I applied it.
Please consider allowing an update to subversion-tools for the next
lenny point release.
Please upload.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: In time for lenny update for request-tracker3.6?
Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 05:25:33PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 04:13:09PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: A minory security update (probably not something that would justify an update on security.debian.org) has been anounced for RT3.6 which affects the version in lenny. http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2009-June/000169.html The patch is included in that message. Would it be okay to upload a fixed package to stable for the upcoming point release? Proposed patch (built and tested) attached. Security team CC'd in case they would prefer it to be handled as a security update. If they do not prefer it to be handled as a security upload, then please upload to proposed-updates. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: postgrey - propagating fix for #504382 to lenny
Marcin Owsiany wrote: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 05:48:47PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 09:40:52AM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: It seems that my upload of $SUBJECT to etch-volatile [1] was never processed, however I'd like to try and upload the fix to lenny-volatile. Please go ahead. I'd also say that it would make sense to fix this in a Lenny point release, no? Me too, not sure about the release team, though. It does not meet any of the criteria in http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates... But I can do an upload if it will be accepted. Hmm, you're replying to a Stable Release Manager... so please upload to proposed-updates. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#531595: Bug#531569: Fixing LaTeX in oldstable
Norbert Preining wrote: Hi Luk, hi Frank, On Do, 18 Jun 2009, Norbert Preining wrote: On Do, 11 Jun 2009, Frank Küster wrote: I am right now uploading an again-installable tetex-bin to oldstable-proposed-updates (I hope that's correct?), and texlive-bin will follow soon. Both uploads have been built in etch pbuilder chroots, and have been tested to fix the problem. The changes are small, essentially only one patch file is added, and except for the changelog one file in debian/ is changed, namely the quilt series file (for tetex-bin) or the dpatch 00list file. The patch is attached. Do we need to do anything else (besides fixing stable and sid, but that isn't urgent since the bug won't show up soon)? sid will be fixed soon, but I have uploaded texlive-bin 2007.dfsg.2-4+lenny1 to proposed-stable-updates which includes the same fix as tetex and texlive-bin 2005 uploaded by Frank. One more problem was found: While the generation of latex format was fixed by this change in the correct way, the generation of three other formats (cslatex/pdfcslatex from texlive-lang-czechslovak, xelatex from texlive-xetex, and mllatex from texlive-formats-extra) are also broken because they *stop* at the warning message and do not generate the format. The latex.ini file that is loaded when generating the (pdf)latex formats contains the line \scrollmode which makes the engine (pdftex/...) *not* stop at the respective message. Unfortunately that line is missing from mllatex.ini, cslatex.ini, xelatex.ini. I have prepared: texlive-base2007.dfsg.2-1~lenny2 texlive-lang2007.dfsg.4-1+lenny1 texlive-extra 2007.dfsg.17-1~lenny02 for stable-proposed updates. The last one would replace the ~lenny01 package that is already in stable. The texlive-lang is the first update for stable. The question is about the first, texlive-base, where I have already uploaded one version (~lenny1) to stable-proposed-updates, but that has not been accepted by now. Should I upload a new ~lenny1 with the additional fixes or should I upload ~lenny1 for that package? You should not reuse changelog entries unless they were not uploaded or made public yet. Please upload accordingly. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Fix for mldonkey postinst script
Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Hello, I've prepared a patch (attached) which fixes a minor issue (#534516) for postinst script of mldonkey but several users have already reported the same issue. Would it be accepted for the next point-release of lenny? No, unless there would be a fix for a more important bug accepted. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Would this transmission update be accepted in a point release?
Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: [please CC] Hey, Hi Would this[0] small patch be accepted as an update for the 1.22 version of transmission in stable? It closes this[1] grave bug. The user also requested this patch[2] to fix this[3] segfault, but I'd understand if you guys think it's a bit too much for a point-release update... Please do upload a version that incorporates both patches. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: multipath-tools 0.4.8-14+lenny2
Guido Günther wrote: Hi, I'd like to fix #534309 for stable. The crash on shutdown is harmless but confuses users a lot since it fills their dmesg. O.k. to upload 0.4.8-14+lenny2 with this fix: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-lvm/multipath-tools.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/0013-multipathd-crash-on-shutdown.patch;h=6adac3b18817c714841d046345cd1622b823f863;hb=9299e3d5cca525070e3feec878a886404f48f89b Yes, please upload. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#531595: Bug#531569: Fixing LaTeX in oldstable
On Di, 30 Jun 2009, Luk Claes wrote: Please upload accordingly. Ok, will upload the next days texlive-base 2007.dfsg.2-1~lenny2 texlive-extra 2007.dfsg.17-1~lenny02 texlive-lang 2007.dfsg.4-1+lenny1 together with the already present/uploaded texlive-bin 2007.dfsg.2-4+lenny1 that should fix the 5years old bug for lenny. Sid will come later. oldstable needs some time ... Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert Preining prein...@logic.atVienna University of Technology Debian Developer prein...@debian.org Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- DARENTH (n.) Measure = 0.176 mg. Defined as that amount of margarine capable of covering one hundred slices of bread to the depth of one molecule. This is the legal maximum allowed in sandwich bars in Greater London. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: SuiteSparse 3.2.0-3.4.0 transition (was: Re: SuiteSparse 3.2.0-3.3.0 transition)
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:25:34AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi Luk, hi *; Luk Claes wrote: The upstream authors of SuiteSparse have released version 3.3.0. If we package this version for Debian, we will have to go through another library transition since the package will be named libsuitesparse-3.3.0. [...] binNMUs scheduled. If I am not overseeing someting it seems to be that this transition - at least when you just count the builds - is nearly ready[1]. illuminator failed to build with a make error on powerpc, but that looks like the bug which was fixed in petsc 3.0.0.dfsg-5 but it was tried with -4+b1. So dw illuminator_0.11.0-3 . powerpc . -m 'libpetsc3.0.0-dev (= 3.0.0.dfsg-5))' (or a direct gb illuminator_0.11.0-3 . powerpc) should do for illuminator. Done petsc itself is a problem, though, segfaults on hppa :(. (Can this be ignored please given the general hppa problems and this stuff hinted in?) Given back too, this ussually helps. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: nano migration
Paul Wise wrote: Hi all, Would it be acceptable to allow nano into testing finally? It has been waiting for 84 days for the maintainer to request migration to testing. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: hinting java updates to testing
Pierre Habouzit schrieb: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:39:16PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: The current set of java packages (introducing java for hppa) in unstable seem to be ready for testing: java-common 0.32 java-gcj-compat 1.0.80-5 gcj-4.4 4.4.0-8 gcc-defaults 1.87 Afaics only gcj-4.4 seems to be too young for the migration to testing. Matthias Afaics the migration is tied to the eglibc one, I've placed the hint, but it's likely to fail until eglibc is ready. I can't see that. Now that gcj-4.4 is in testing, there shouldn't be any glibc specific dependencies. At least I can't see these in the update excuses. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: nano migration
Hi, On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:37:01PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Would it be acceptable to allow nano into testing finally? It has been waiting for 84 days for the maintainer to request migration to testing. I actually wasn't aware it was me who had to request a migration. Sorry about that. :) Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
openjdk-6 6b14-4 built but not uploaded
According to the buildd logs the openjdk-6 6b14-4 build for mipsel did finish on Jun 20, but was not uploaded until now. Is there any interest within the mips porters on openjdk-6 on mips*, or should we just remove it from the archive and drop openjdk support on mips? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: openjdk-6 6b14-4 built but not uploaded
Matthias Klose wrote: According to the buildd logs the openjdk-6 6b14-4 build for mipsel did finish on Jun 20, but was not uploaded until now. Is there any interest within the mips porters on openjdk-6 on mips*, or should we just remove it from the archive and drop openjdk support on mips? In theory we are interested in it, but to date have not tested it. So unless there is strong objection I would keep mips support. David Daney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: openjdk-6 6b14-4 built but not uploaded
Matthias Klose wrote: According to the buildd logs the openjdk-6 6b14-4 build for mipsel did finish on Jun 20, but was not uploaded until now. Is there any interest within the mips porters on openjdk-6 on mips*, or should we just remove it from the archive and drop openjdk support on mips? Scheduled for upload now. Do you think the failure on hppa was temporary or is there a bug to be filed? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: libcdio transition
Nicolas Boullis wrote: Dear release team, Hi Nicolas I'd like to upload a recent libcdio to unstable. Unfortunately, as usual with libcdio, upgrading from 0.78.2 to 0.81 means breaking the ABI and changing the sonames of the libcdio and libiso9660 libraries... Note that libcdio 0.81-3 was already uploaded to experimental. Good. How should I handle the transition to the best? If you are sure that there are no API changes, then please upload to unstable and tell us when you did so we can schedule binNMUs (as it does not seem to interfere with existing transitions). Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
