Re: Migriting haskell-platform

2010-05-27 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 17:33 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
 Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 08:50 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
  On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 08:11:02AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
   Sorry for the late response, I've given back missingh. I can't specify
   the buildd that will pick it up next, but there are two other sid
   buildds besides lafayette.
  
  fyi, build was successful.
 
 great, thanks for your work.
 
 Now we’ll just have to wait for haskell-configfile and hsftp to build on
 hppa (where I expect now problem), which were waiting for missingh, and
 then haskell-platform will hopefully migrate.

Which just happened and according to
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=haskell-platform
haskell-platform  just migrated to testing.

This means we will release squeeze with an up-to-date Haskell Platform.
Great!

Thanks for holding back your uploads, you may flood the gates once more,
Haskell Team :-)

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
  nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: unblock 574770 with 577880

2010-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Err, samba4 in not in testing, so it's not really a blocker
 unblock 574770 with 577880
Bug #574770 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (2.6)
Was blocked by: 577900 558996 577880 573161 576225 576210 574730 581204 558983 
524746 577061 534848 568892 580148 534068 581884 581012 529478 565665 570580 
577388 581672 581394 580678 581008 577898
Removed blocking bug(s) of 574770: 577880
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
574770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127497600222190.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: unblock 574770 with 581394

2010-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Build issue that doesn't trigger on buildds anymore:
 unblock 574770 with 581394
Bug #574770 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (2.6)
Was blocked by: 577900 558996 573161 576225 576210 574730 581204 558983 524746 
534848 577061 568892 580148 534068 581884 581012 565665 529478 570580 577388 
580678 581394 581672 581008 577898
Removed blocking bug(s) of 574770: 581394
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
574770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127497618424178.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: please unblock: nufw and nuapplet

2010-05-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 23:48 +0200, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
 I have a problem with some of my packages: nuapplet and nufw (the first
 depends on some libraries provided by the second).
 Recently, there was a bug in nufw causing a build failure in nuapplet [1]
 The transition was then (automatically) blocked for both packages.
 
 I have uploaded new version for both packages which fix several problems
 including the build failure.
 However, the packages are not moving to testing as they should (even
 though the wait period is over). The excuse page lists the old bug [2] [3]
 but this is wrong, both packages now build fine [4]

So far as I can see, the only place a bug is mentioned is in nuapplet's
excuses; that says fixes old bugs, which is fine.

 Could you remove this block so that both packages can move to testing ?

There isn't any form of active blocking in this case.  The reason the
packages aren't migrating is that libnuclient has changed soname between
the versions in testing and unstable - migrating nufw on its own would
therefore cause the testing version of nuapplet to become uninstallable,
as libnuclient3 would no longer exist in testing; the packages thus need
to migrate together.

I've added a hint to that effect, so the packages should migrate
tonight.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1274984247.7995.620.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net



Re: Bug#583143: sun-java6-jre: version 6-20-0lenny1 does not install , from proposed updates in debian lenny

2010-05-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 21:45 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Patrick Holthuizen patr...@eaze.org wrote:
  Package: sun-java6-jre
  Versions: 6-20-0lenny1
 ...
  (/var/lib/apt/lists/http.us.debian.org_debian_dists_lenny-proposed-updates_non-free_binary-i386_Packages)
 
 Neither i386 nor ia64 packages have been built for proposed-updates so
 far (maybe because sun-java6 is a non-free package). But this is not a
 bug in the package. I am Cc-ing the release team to get some
 clarification.

As Rene mentioned, non-free autobuilding is currently not operational;
there is ongoing work to integrate it in to the buildd network.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1274984496.7995.691.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net



Re: Status of lxde

2010-05-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 21:30 +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
 What is the current situation/plan with lxde's transition to testing?

Apologies for not getting back to you sooner.

We've recently (finally) managed to narrow down the location / cause of
the issue but haven't yet found a solution.  Feel free to skip some of
the explanation below; it's partly to make sure the details are
documented, and in case they provide anyone with any inspiration.

To recap, britney believes that migrating the new lxde packages to
testing would cause the tasksel-meta-faux package to become
uninstallable; t-m-f is a fake package which is injected in to the i386
packages files processed by britney, to ensure that all packages listed
by tasksel as core to any task remain installable.  Unfortunately
attempts to reproduce the problem by other methods, such as installing
the involved packages in testing chroots or force-migrating the packages
in a test britney run and running edos-debcheck on the resulting
packages file have been unsuccessful.

I've managed to produce a minimal test-case, in that using lxde-core,
gnome-desktop-environment and ignoring the other packages normally in
t-m-f causes the issue.  Considering the co-installability of those two
packages leads to a sufficiently high number of packages being
considered that britney's dependency resolver aborts the test; I've
tried increasing the limit, but so far only with the same result after a
longer wait.

As the order in which packages are considered can make a difference to
the number of packages which need to be checked I've also been
experimenting with expanding g-d-e to its component packages but have
not yet found an ordering which works.  Maintaining this in the longer
term would also not be ideal, as the list is generated from tasksel's
data files, which include g-d-e, and is not explicitly ordered.

I've confirmed that forcing lxde in to testing appears to produce no
issues other than the tasksel-meta-faux uninstallability; the problem is
that by doing so we would lose the ability to detect any further issues
with the co-installability of the package set, as they would not
increase the count of problems in testing.

This mail has ended up being somewhat longer than I'd intended, but
hopefully it's useful.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1274986121.7995.1177.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net



Processed: Re: Bug#583175: mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)

2010-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 583175 normal
Bug #583175 [mancala] mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'

 reassign 583175 release.debian.org
Bug #583175 [mancala] mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Bug reassigned from package 'mancala' to 'release.debian.org'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions mancala/1.0.1-3.
 retitle  583175 nmu: mancala
Bug #583175 [release.debian.org] mancala: Please rebuild against new 
libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Changed Bug title to 'nmu: mancala' from 'mancala: Please rebuild against new 
libforms-dev (1.0.93)'
 user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was ans...@43-1.org).
 usertags 583175 + binnmu
Bug#583175: nmu: mancala
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: binnmu.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
583175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583175
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12749867906643.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#583174: predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)

2010-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 583174 normal
Bug #583174 [predict-gsat] predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new 
libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'

 reassign 583174 release.debian.org
Bug #583174 [predict-gsat] predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new 
libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Bug reassigned from package 'predict-gsat' to 'release.debian.org'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions predict/2.2.3-2.
 retitle  583174 nmu: predict
Bug #583174 [release.debian.org] predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new 
libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Changed Bug title to 'nmu: predict' from 'predict-gsat: Please rebuild against 
new libforms-dev (1.0.93)'
 user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was ans...@43-1.org).
 usertags 583174 + binnmu
Bug#583174: nmu: predict
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: binnmu.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
583174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583174
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12749870308470.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: Bug#583175: mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)

2010-05-27 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
severity 583175 normal
reassign 583175 release.debian.org
retitle  583175 nmu: mancala
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 583175 + binnmu
thanks

Hi,

Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org writes:
 libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable.  It's now possible to
 rebuild mancala for libforms2.

please schedule a binNMU for mancala:

nmu mancala_1.0.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libforms2'
dw  mancala_1.0.1-3 . ALL . -m 'libforms-dev (= 1.0.93sp1-1)'

Thanks,
Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fx1db2bc@marvin.43-1.org



Re: Bug#583174: predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)

2010-05-27 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
severity 583174 normal
reassign 583174 release.debian.org
retitle  583174 nmu: predict
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 583174 + binnmu
thanks

Hi,

Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org writes:

 libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable.  It's now possible to
 rebuild predict-gast for libforms2.

Please schedule a binNMU for predict:

nmu predict_2.2.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libforms2'
dw  predict_2.2.3-2 . ALL . -m 'libforms-dev (= 1.0.93sp1-1)'

Thanks,
Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8739xdb20h@marvin.43-1.org



Bug#583174: marked as done (nmu: predict)

2010-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 20:49:15 +0100
with message-id 
1274989755.9315.991.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#583174: predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new 
libforms-dev (1.0.93)
has caused the Debian Bug report #583174,
regarding nmu: predict
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
583174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583174
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: predict-gsat
Version: 2.2.3-2
Severity: grave

Hello,

There was a bump in the libforms soname from 1 to 2, and I am keeping
only one development version.  So please rebuild predict-gsat against
libforms-dev (1.0.93) as soon as it hits unstable.  Your package will
then depend on libforms2.

I have asked for the removal of the libforms1 package, on which predict-gsat
currently depends.

I will send a reminder to this bug report as soon as libforms2 becomes
available.

Thanks,
Peter

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages predict-gsat depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.28.0-1The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc62.10.2-6Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcairo21.8.10-3The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libfontconfig1   2.8.0-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libforms11.0.92sp1-5 The XForms graphical interface wid
ii  libfreetype6 2.3.11-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.22.4-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.18.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-01.26.2-2Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libx11-6 2:1.3.3-2   X11 client-side library
ii  netbase  4.40Basic TCP/IP networking system

predict-gsat recommends no packages.

Versions of packages predict-gsat suggests:
ii  ntp   1:4.2.6+dfsg-1 Network Time Protocol daemon and u
pn  predict   none (no description available)

-- no debconf information

-- 
Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer  p...@debian.org
 http://people.debian.org/~psg
GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE  6E68 8170 35FF 799E


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 04:03 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
 Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org writes:
 
  libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable.  It's now possible to
  rebuild predict-gast for libforms2.
 
 Please schedule a binNMU for predict:
 
 nmu predict_2.2.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libforms2'
 dw  predict_2.2.3-2 . ALL . -m 'libforms-dev (= 1.0.93sp1-1)'

Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam

---End Message---


Bug#583175: marked as done (nmu: mancala)

2010-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 20:50:42 +0100
with message-id 
1274989842.9315.1029.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#583175: mancala: Please rebuild against new 
libforms-dev (1.0.93)
has caused the Debian Bug report #583175,
regarding nmu: mancala
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
583175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583175
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: mancala
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: grave

Hello,

There was a bump in the libforms soname from 1 to 2, and I am keeping
only one development version.  So please rebuild mancala against
libforms-dev (1.0.93) as soon as it hits unstable.  Your package will
then depend on libforms2.

I have asked for the removal of the libforms1 package, on which mancala
currently depends.

I will send a reminder to this bug report as soon as libforms2 becomes
available.

Thanks,
Peter

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages mancala depends on:
ii  libc62.10.2-6Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libforms11.0.92sp1-5 The XForms graphical interface wid
ii  libx11-6 2:1.3.3-2   X11 client-side library
ii  libxpm4  1:3.5.8-1   X11 pixmap library

mancala recommends no packages.

mancala suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer  p...@debian.org
 http://people.debian.org/~psg
GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE  6E68 8170 35FF 799E


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 03:57 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
 Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org writes:
  libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable.  It's now possible to
  rebuild mancala for libforms2.
 
 please schedule a binNMU for mancala:
 
 nmu mancala_1.0.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libforms2'
 dw  mancala_1.0.1-3 . ALL . -m 'libforms-dev (= 1.0.93sp1-1)'

Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam

---End Message---


Re: please unblock: nufw and nuapplet

2010-05-27 Thread Pierre Chifflier
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:17:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 23:48 +0200, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
  I have a problem with some of my packages: nuapplet and nufw (the first
  depends on some libraries provided by the second).
  Recently, there was a bug in nufw causing a build failure in nuapplet [1]
  The transition was then (automatically) blocked for both packages.
  
  I have uploaded new version for both packages which fix several problems
  including the build failure.
  However, the packages are not moving to testing as they should (even
  though the wait period is over). The excuse page lists the old bug [2] [3]
  but this is wrong, both packages now build fine [4]
 
 So far as I can see, the only place a bug is mentioned is in nuapplet's
 excuses; that says fixes old bugs, which is fine.
 
  Could you remove this block so that both packages can move to testing ?
 
 There isn't any form of active blocking in this case.  The reason the
 packages aren't migrating is that libnuclient has changed soname between
 the versions in testing and unstable - migrating nufw on its own would
 therefore cause the testing version of nuapplet to become uninstallable,
 as libnuclient3 would no longer exist in testing; the packages thus need
 to migrate together.
 
 I've added a hint to that effect, so the packages should migrate
 tonight.
 

Ok, I understand now - indeed, the changes in nufw have caused an
increase of the soname number.

Thanks for the explanation and the solution.

Pierre


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100527201056.gh25...@piche.inl.fr



Bug#583174: predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)

2010-05-27 Thread A. Maitland Bottoms
There's a few other bugs I can fix with a 2.2.3-3 upload.
Thanks!

-Maitland



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/19454.59154.41817.876...@airborne.nrl.navy.mil



Bug#583174: marked as done (nmu: predict)

2010-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 22:14:24 +
with message-id e1ohllm-00015x...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#583174: fixed in predict 2.2.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #583174,
regarding nmu: predict
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
583174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583174
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: predict-gsat
Version: 2.2.3-2
Severity: grave

Hello,

There was a bump in the libforms soname from 1 to 2, and I am keeping
only one development version.  So please rebuild predict-gsat against
libforms-dev (1.0.93) as soon as it hits unstable.  Your package will
then depend on libforms2.

I have asked for the removal of the libforms1 package, on which predict-gsat
currently depends.

I will send a reminder to this bug report as soon as libforms2 becomes
available.

Thanks,
Peter

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages predict-gsat depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.28.0-1The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc62.10.2-6Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcairo21.8.10-3The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libfontconfig1   2.8.0-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libforms11.0.92sp1-5 The XForms graphical interface wid
ii  libfreetype6 2.3.11-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.22.4-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.18.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-01.26.2-2Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libx11-6 2:1.3.3-2   X11 client-side library
ii  netbase  4.40Basic TCP/IP networking system

predict-gsat recommends no packages.

Versions of packages predict-gsat suggests:
ii  ntp   1:4.2.6+dfsg-1 Network Time Protocol daemon and u
pn  predict   none (no description available)

-- no debconf information

-- 
Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer  p...@debian.org
 http://people.debian.org/~psg
GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE  6E68 8170 35FF 799E


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: predict
Source-Version: 2.2.3-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
predict, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

predict-gsat_2.2.3-3_amd64.deb
  to main/p/predict/predict-gsat_2.2.3-3_amd64.deb
predict_2.2.3-3.diff.gz
  to main/p/predict/predict_2.2.3-3.diff.gz
predict_2.2.3-3.dsc
  to main/p/predict/predict_2.2.3-3.dsc
predict_2.2.3-3_amd64.deb
  to main/p/predict/predict_2.2.3-3_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 583...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
A. Maitland Bottoms bott...@debian.org (supplier of updated predict package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 16:46:11 -0400
Source: predict
Binary: predict predict-gsat
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: A. Maitland Bottoms bott...@debian.org
Changed-By: A. Maitland Bottoms bott...@debian.org
Description: 
 predict- Satellite Tracking Program with Optional Voice Output
 predict-gsat - Graphical Satellite Tracking Client Program
Closes: 429049 576087 576365 583174
Changes: 
 predict (2.2.3-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Update for libforms2 (Closes: #583174)
   * debian/compat set to 7.
   * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.4.
   * man page is OK, don't include predict.txt.gz (Closes: #429049)
   * Include patches from Ubuntu (Closes: #576087, #576365)
   * debian/patched/140_fix-buffer-overflow.diff: Fix buffer
 overflow on launching with -s (patch from Norvald H. Ryeng)
   * debian/patches/141_buffer_overflow.diff: Fix