Re: Migriting haskell-platform
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 17:33 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 08:50 -0600 schrieb dann frazier: On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 08:11:02AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: Sorry for the late response, I've given back missingh. I can't specify the buildd that will pick it up next, but there are two other sid buildds besides lafayette. fyi, build was successful. great, thanks for your work. Now we’ll just have to wait for haskell-configfile and hsftp to build on hppa (where I expect now problem), which were waiting for missingh, and then haskell-platform will hopefully migrate. Which just happened and according to http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=haskell-platform haskell-platform just migrated to testing. This means we will release squeeze with an up-to-date Haskell Platform. Great! Thanks for holding back your uploads, you may flood the gates once more, Haskell Team :-) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: unblock 574770 with 577880
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Err, samba4 in not in testing, so it's not really a blocker unblock 574770 with 577880 Bug #574770 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (2.6) Was blocked by: 577900 558996 577880 573161 576225 576210 574730 581204 558983 524746 577061 534848 568892 580148 534068 581884 581012 529478 565665 570580 577388 581672 581394 580678 581008 577898 Removed blocking bug(s) of 574770: 577880 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 574770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574770 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127497600222190.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: unblock 574770 with 581394
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Build issue that doesn't trigger on buildds anymore: unblock 574770 with 581394 Bug #574770 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (2.6) Was blocked by: 577900 558996 573161 576225 576210 574730 581204 558983 524746 534848 577061 568892 580148 534068 581884 581012 565665 529478 570580 577388 580678 581394 581672 581008 577898 Removed blocking bug(s) of 574770: 581394 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 574770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574770 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127497618424178.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: please unblock: nufw and nuapplet
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 23:48 +0200, Pierre Chifflier wrote: I have a problem with some of my packages: nuapplet and nufw (the first depends on some libraries provided by the second). Recently, there was a bug in nufw causing a build failure in nuapplet [1] The transition was then (automatically) blocked for both packages. I have uploaded new version for both packages which fix several problems including the build failure. However, the packages are not moving to testing as they should (even though the wait period is over). The excuse page lists the old bug [2] [3] but this is wrong, both packages now build fine [4] So far as I can see, the only place a bug is mentioned is in nuapplet's excuses; that says fixes old bugs, which is fine. Could you remove this block so that both packages can move to testing ? There isn't any form of active blocking in this case. The reason the packages aren't migrating is that libnuclient has changed soname between the versions in testing and unstable - migrating nufw on its own would therefore cause the testing version of nuapplet to become uninstallable, as libnuclient3 would no longer exist in testing; the packages thus need to migrate together. I've added a hint to that effect, so the packages should migrate tonight. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1274984247.7995.620.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Re: Bug#583143: sun-java6-jre: version 6-20-0lenny1 does not install , from proposed updates in debian lenny
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 21:45 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Patrick Holthuizen patr...@eaze.org wrote: Package: sun-java6-jre Versions: 6-20-0lenny1 ... (/var/lib/apt/lists/http.us.debian.org_debian_dists_lenny-proposed-updates_non-free_binary-i386_Packages) Neither i386 nor ia64 packages have been built for proposed-updates so far (maybe because sun-java6 is a non-free package). But this is not a bug in the package. I am Cc-ing the release team to get some clarification. As Rene mentioned, non-free autobuilding is currently not operational; there is ongoing work to integrate it in to the buildd network. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1274984496.7995.691.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Re: Status of lxde
On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 21:30 +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: What is the current situation/plan with lxde's transition to testing? Apologies for not getting back to you sooner. We've recently (finally) managed to narrow down the location / cause of the issue but haven't yet found a solution. Feel free to skip some of the explanation below; it's partly to make sure the details are documented, and in case they provide anyone with any inspiration. To recap, britney believes that migrating the new lxde packages to testing would cause the tasksel-meta-faux package to become uninstallable; t-m-f is a fake package which is injected in to the i386 packages files processed by britney, to ensure that all packages listed by tasksel as core to any task remain installable. Unfortunately attempts to reproduce the problem by other methods, such as installing the involved packages in testing chroots or force-migrating the packages in a test britney run and running edos-debcheck on the resulting packages file have been unsuccessful. I've managed to produce a minimal test-case, in that using lxde-core, gnome-desktop-environment and ignoring the other packages normally in t-m-f causes the issue. Considering the co-installability of those two packages leads to a sufficiently high number of packages being considered that britney's dependency resolver aborts the test; I've tried increasing the limit, but so far only with the same result after a longer wait. As the order in which packages are considered can make a difference to the number of packages which need to be checked I've also been experimenting with expanding g-d-e to its component packages but have not yet found an ordering which works. Maintaining this in the longer term would also not be ideal, as the list is generated from tasksel's data files, which include g-d-e, and is not explicitly ordered. I've confirmed that forcing lxde in to testing appears to produce no issues other than the tasksel-meta-faux uninstallability; the problem is that by doing so we would lose the ability to detect any further issues with the co-installability of the package set, as they would not increase the count of problems in testing. This mail has ended up being somewhat longer than I'd intended, but hopefully it's useful. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1274986121.7995.1177.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Processed: Re: Bug#583175: mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 583175 normal Bug #583175 [mancala] mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93) Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' reassign 583175 release.debian.org Bug #583175 [mancala] mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93) Bug reassigned from package 'mancala' to 'release.debian.org'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions mancala/1.0.1-3. retitle 583175 nmu: mancala Bug #583175 [release.debian.org] mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93) Changed Bug title to 'nmu: mancala' from 'mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)' user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was ans...@43-1.org). usertags 583175 + binnmu Bug#583175: nmu: mancala There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: binnmu. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 583175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583175 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12749867906643.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#583174: predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 583174 normal Bug #583174 [predict-gsat] predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93) Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' reassign 583174 release.debian.org Bug #583174 [predict-gsat] predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93) Bug reassigned from package 'predict-gsat' to 'release.debian.org'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions predict/2.2.3-2. retitle 583174 nmu: predict Bug #583174 [release.debian.org] predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93) Changed Bug title to 'nmu: predict' from 'predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)' user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was ans...@43-1.org). usertags 583174 + binnmu Bug#583174: nmu: predict There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: binnmu. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 583174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583174 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12749870308470.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#583175: mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)
severity 583175 normal reassign 583175 release.debian.org retitle 583175 nmu: mancala user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 583175 + binnmu thanks Hi, Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org writes: libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable. It's now possible to rebuild mancala for libforms2. please schedule a binNMU for mancala: nmu mancala_1.0.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libforms2' dw mancala_1.0.1-3 . ALL . -m 'libforms-dev (= 1.0.93sp1-1)' Thanks, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fx1db2bc@marvin.43-1.org
Re: Bug#583174: predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)
severity 583174 normal reassign 583174 release.debian.org retitle 583174 nmu: predict user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 583174 + binnmu thanks Hi, Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org writes: libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable. It's now possible to rebuild predict-gast for libforms2. Please schedule a binNMU for predict: nmu predict_2.2.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libforms2' dw predict_2.2.3-2 . ALL . -m 'libforms-dev (= 1.0.93sp1-1)' Thanks, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8739xdb20h@marvin.43-1.org
Bug#583174: marked as done (nmu: predict)
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 20:49:15 +0100 with message-id 1274989755.9315.991.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net and subject line Re: Bug#583174: predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93) has caused the Debian Bug report #583174, regarding nmu: predict to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 583174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583174 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: predict-gsat Version: 2.2.3-2 Severity: grave Hello, There was a bump in the libforms soname from 1 to 2, and I am keeping only one development version. So please rebuild predict-gsat against libforms-dev (1.0.93) as soon as it hits unstable. Your package will then depend on libforms2. I have asked for the removal of the libforms1 package, on which predict-gsat currently depends. I will send a reminder to this bug report as soon as libforms2 becomes available. Thanks, Peter -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages predict-gsat depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.28.0-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.10.2-6Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcairo21.8.10-3The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2 generic font configuration library ii libforms11.0.92sp1-5 The XForms graphical interface wid ii libfreetype6 2.3.11-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.22.4-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.18.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-01.26.2-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-2 X11 client-side library ii netbase 4.40Basic TCP/IP networking system predict-gsat recommends no packages. Versions of packages predict-gsat suggests: ii ntp 1:4.2.6+dfsg-1 Network Time Protocol daemon and u pn predict none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer p...@debian.org http://people.debian.org/~psg GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE 6E68 8170 35FF 799E ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 04:03 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org writes: libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable. It's now possible to rebuild predict-gast for libforms2. Please schedule a binNMU for predict: nmu predict_2.2.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libforms2' dw predict_2.2.3-2 . ALL . -m 'libforms-dev (= 1.0.93sp1-1)' Scheduled. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#583175: marked as done (nmu: mancala)
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 20:50:42 +0100 with message-id 1274989842.9315.1029.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net and subject line Re: Bug#583175: mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93) has caused the Debian Bug report #583175, regarding nmu: mancala to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 583175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583175 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: mancala Version: 1.0.1-3 Severity: grave Hello, There was a bump in the libforms soname from 1 to 2, and I am keeping only one development version. So please rebuild mancala against libforms-dev (1.0.93) as soon as it hits unstable. Your package will then depend on libforms2. I have asked for the removal of the libforms1 package, on which mancala currently depends. I will send a reminder to this bug report as soon as libforms2 becomes available. Thanks, Peter -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages mancala depends on: ii libc62.10.2-6Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libforms11.0.92sp1-5 The XForms graphical interface wid ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-2 X11 client-side library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.8-1 X11 pixmap library mancala recommends no packages. mancala suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer p...@debian.org http://people.debian.org/~psg GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE 6E68 8170 35FF 799E ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 03:57 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org writes: libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable. It's now possible to rebuild mancala for libforms2. please schedule a binNMU for mancala: nmu mancala_1.0.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libforms2' dw mancala_1.0.1-3 . ALL . -m 'libforms-dev (= 1.0.93sp1-1)' Scheduled. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Re: please unblock: nufw and nuapplet
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:17:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 23:48 +0200, Pierre Chifflier wrote: I have a problem with some of my packages: nuapplet and nufw (the first depends on some libraries provided by the second). Recently, there was a bug in nufw causing a build failure in nuapplet [1] The transition was then (automatically) blocked for both packages. I have uploaded new version for both packages which fix several problems including the build failure. However, the packages are not moving to testing as they should (even though the wait period is over). The excuse page lists the old bug [2] [3] but this is wrong, both packages now build fine [4] So far as I can see, the only place a bug is mentioned is in nuapplet's excuses; that says fixes old bugs, which is fine. Could you remove this block so that both packages can move to testing ? There isn't any form of active blocking in this case. The reason the packages aren't migrating is that libnuclient has changed soname between the versions in testing and unstable - migrating nufw on its own would therefore cause the testing version of nuapplet to become uninstallable, as libnuclient3 would no longer exist in testing; the packages thus need to migrate together. I've added a hint to that effect, so the packages should migrate tonight. Ok, I understand now - indeed, the changes in nufw have caused an increase of the soname number. Thanks for the explanation and the solution. Pierre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100527201056.gh25...@piche.inl.fr
Bug#583174: predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)
There's a few other bugs I can fix with a 2.2.3-3 upload. Thanks! -Maitland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/19454.59154.41817.876...@airborne.nrl.navy.mil
Bug#583174: marked as done (nmu: predict)
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 22:14:24 + with message-id e1ohllm-00015x...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#583174: fixed in predict 2.2.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #583174, regarding nmu: predict to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 583174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583174 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: predict-gsat Version: 2.2.3-2 Severity: grave Hello, There was a bump in the libforms soname from 1 to 2, and I am keeping only one development version. So please rebuild predict-gsat against libforms-dev (1.0.93) as soon as it hits unstable. Your package will then depend on libforms2. I have asked for the removal of the libforms1 package, on which predict-gsat currently depends. I will send a reminder to this bug report as soon as libforms2 becomes available. Thanks, Peter -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages predict-gsat depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.28.0-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.10.2-6Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcairo21.8.10-3The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2 generic font configuration library ii libforms11.0.92sp1-5 The XForms graphical interface wid ii libfreetype6 2.3.11-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.22.4-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.18.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-01.26.2-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-2 X11 client-side library ii netbase 4.40Basic TCP/IP networking system predict-gsat recommends no packages. Versions of packages predict-gsat suggests: ii ntp 1:4.2.6+dfsg-1 Network Time Protocol daemon and u pn predict none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer p...@debian.org http://people.debian.org/~psg GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE 6E68 8170 35FF 799E ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: predict Source-Version: 2.2.3-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of predict, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: predict-gsat_2.2.3-3_amd64.deb to main/p/predict/predict-gsat_2.2.3-3_amd64.deb predict_2.2.3-3.diff.gz to main/p/predict/predict_2.2.3-3.diff.gz predict_2.2.3-3.dsc to main/p/predict/predict_2.2.3-3.dsc predict_2.2.3-3_amd64.deb to main/p/predict/predict_2.2.3-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 583...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. A. Maitland Bottoms bott...@debian.org (supplier of updated predict package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 16:46:11 -0400 Source: predict Binary: predict predict-gsat Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.2.3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: A. Maitland Bottoms bott...@debian.org Changed-By: A. Maitland Bottoms bott...@debian.org Description: predict- Satellite Tracking Program with Optional Voice Output predict-gsat - Graphical Satellite Tracking Client Program Closes: 429049 576087 576365 583174 Changes: predict (2.2.3-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Update for libforms2 (Closes: #583174) * debian/compat set to 7. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.4. * man page is OK, don't include predict.txt.gz (Closes: #429049) * Include patches from Ubuntu (Closes: #576087, #576365) * debian/patched/140_fix-buffer-overflow.diff: Fix buffer overflow on launching with -s (patch from Norvald H. Ryeng) * debian/patches/141_buffer_overflow.diff: Fix