Re: Freeze exception for Ampache

[Charlie Smotherman]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Adam D. Barratt
 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 14:33 -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 20:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> I have applied the changes you have suggested.  Thx :)
>> I have tried to keep changes to a minimum but after release I plan to
>> use a state engine for the debconf questions so if the answers to the
>> questions is no the installation will exit gracefully.
>
> The postrm fix appears to be missing the final "fi"; the indentation's
> now also confusing, but that's possibly my fault for providing a diff
> which didn't re-indent to make it clearer where the changes were.
>

Done, Inserted missing "fi'.
Done, I went ahead and fixed the indentation throughout the entire
postrm, sorry for the noise in the diff.

>> > fwiw, I also found the wording of the "configure and restart the web
>> > server" question slightly confusing, as it suggests that the
>> > configuration will be performed in any case and only the restarting will
>> > not be done automatically.
>>
>> What would you suggest?
>> Is it to late in the release cycle to request this from the translation
>> team or should this wait until after release?
>
> Reading it through again it's not quite as confusing as I remember. :)
> It would be good to make it clearer, but I'm not sure there's any great
> rush.

I will work on this to make it clearer in squeeze +1.

I will also be adding  a debconf template stating that the webserver
is not configured for ampache and that it needs to be done manually,
and exit gracefully if the answer to the debconf
ampache/webserver_restart question is "no", for squeeze +1.

Attached is a debdiff of the changes.

The new package can be grabbed at

http://vollmer.kicks-ass.net/amp/ampache_3.5.4-8.dsc

Best regards
Charlie


amp--diff
Description: Binary data

Bug#597471: unblock: zoneminder/1.24.2-7

[Vagrant Cascadian]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package zoneminder

the -6 version fixes two RC bugs, and the -7 version fixes a regression
introduced when fixing those bugs.

zoneminder (1.24.2-7) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Do not set ownership of /var/cache/zoneminder when upgrading, which fixes a
regression causing upgrades to take inordinately long with large
installations (closes: #597040).

 -- Vagrant Cascadian   Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:24:41 -0700

zoneminder (1.24.2-6) unstable; urgency=low

  * Only remove database on purge. This requires only creating the database if
it doesn't already exist, and upgrading the database only if the database
is an older version (closes: #497107).

  * Do not prompt the user on database upgrades by using the --nointeractive
flag when calling zmupdate.pl from postinst (closes: #595902).

 -- Vagrant Cascadian   Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:06:06 -0700


unblock zoneminder/1.24.2-7


thanks for all your work!

live well,
  vagrant



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100920005917.ga1...@claws.fglan

Bug#597473: unblock: boinc/6.10.58+dfsg-3

[Steffen Moeller]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package boinc

I am sponsoring this upload for Daniel who has fixed two frequently reported 
bugs

  * debian/boinc-client.init: wait until BOINC has ended for "stop"
action. This fixes the post-removal script to be run too early,
when the system user might be still logged in and cannot be
deleted (LP: #583434). It also fixes the "restart" action.
  * debian/boinc-client.init: schedule: do not fail if chrt fails
(LP: #629649).

I have looked over it, tried it and am excited. It works very nicely. The 
package
is co-maintained between Debian and Ubuntu. Those two bugs affect Debian alike,
albeit reported on launchpad. Please allow this update in.

Many thanks

Steffen, also in the name of Rene and Daniel


unblock boinc/6.10.58+dfsg-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100920011123.22948.75589.report...@toshiba.siemens

Bug#597472: firegpg 0.8-1 for squeeze?

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

Package: release.debian.org

hi debian release team--

FireGPG is unfortunately in an unmaintained state by upstream, and 0.8
appears to be a terminal release.

  http://blog.getfiregpg.org/2010/06/07/firegpg-discontinued/

version 0.7.10 (in testing right now) appears to have had a transient
FTBFS due (i think) to some fluctuations in the xulrunner-dev packages.
(#595833)

the only change (aside from localization updates) which upstream made
for version 0.8 was to disable the (broken) GMail support, as the web
service changed too frequently to keep up.

As such, i've packaged 0.8, which i'm willing to maintain for the life
of squeeze in the hopes that someone new will pick up upstream development.

However, i'm not prepared to deal with bugs in the gmail support
features, since they are a known problem and a sisyphean task.

So i ask that you either update firegpg in squeeze from 0.7.10 to 0.8-1,
or pull firegpg from squeeze entirely.

There are no reverse dependencies, so i don't believe that an update to
0.8 would be harmful, but i trust you all to make the right decision for
squeeze.

Thanks for all your work.

--dkg



firegpg (0.8-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New Upstream Release
   - disables gmail support (Closes: #567735)
  * enable the use of C++ extensions to match how libxul is being built
(according to #warnings in
/usr/include/xulrunner-1.9.1/unstable/nscore.h:406)
  * bumped standards-version to 3.9.1 (no changes needed)

 -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor   Sun, 19 Sep 2010
17:44:32 -0400




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Udev 151-2 upgrade problem on debian-testing-'squeeze' i386 cd binary1 20090302-04-:09

[Steve Langasek]

Ciao Marco,

I've been working on wrapping my head fully around the various issues with
the udev and kernel upgrade, to ensure we have it documented properly in the
release notes.  It's clear to me that we will need to include documentation
of this issue in the release notes no matter what changes are made to the
packages, because users will need to know that the new udev won't work
correctly with the Debian 2.6.26 kernels.  At the same time, I think
something needs to change in the packages to improve the 'dist-upgrade'
experience, because we both know many users won't read the release notes.

First, what happened to the idea of using 'Breaks'?  This was proposed
months ago, but it hasn't been implemented yet in the package.  Should I
provide a patch that implements this?

Second, I've done some research and testing regarding the nature of the
incompatibility with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED.  From what I see, the primary
impact of dropping the compat code from udev is that udev rules will no
longer be applied to certain devices, such as block devices and network
devices.  This will break /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules, and
break any permission-setting on disks (e.g., the 'disk' and 'floppy' groups)
and certain alias symlinks for CD drives, but those are the only problems
I've been able to identify on a standard as a result of running udev 160
with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED; and of these, only 70-persistent-net.rules is
potentially a boot-breaker, and would still permit booting the system far
enough to rescue by hand at console (i.e., the same process one would use if
a newer kernel was installed but not configured to boot by default, which is
one of the scenarios that currently permits bypassing this preinst error).

So do you know of any other things that will break, or can you provide
pointers to other areas I should look at?  You mention in the bug that some
rules "will not work in ways beyond most people's ability to understand",
but I don't even see any documentation here for those of us who *do* have
the ability to understand and want to try to explain it to the others.  :-)
If there aren't any other issues, then IMHO the case is clear for
downgrading the CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED handling from a preinst abort to a
preinst debconf note (i.e.: interrupt the upgrade before udev unpack, to
make sure the admin gets the message before we proceed).  Right now, the
cure (aborting the install of a core package during a dist-upgrade, leaving
apt in a difficult-to-fix state) is definitely much worse than the disease
(some devices not fully configured after reboot if the kernel isn't
upgraded, requiring the user to grab a console shell to install a proper
kernel).

Third, you write that the old udev *also* won't work with the new kernel.
Can you be more specific?  In my testing, this also works fine; I wasn't
able to identify anything out of place when rebooting to a 2.6.32 Debian
kernel with a lenny udev.

Finally, you comment in
 that "the new
kernel (indirectly) depends on a newer udev."  In my testing, I'm able to
install a 2.6.32-5 kernel package from squeeze directly onto lenny without
upgrading udev in the process.  When you say it "indirectly depends", do you
mean that there is a *logical* dependency that isn't reflected in the
package dependencies, or are you referring to some earlier situation whereby
upgrading the kernel package did pull in a udev upgrade at the same time?


To summarize, with the information I have available, I believe there are two
changes that should be made to the udev package:

 - add the Breaks: linux-image-2.6-$flavor
   (<< $SYSFS_DEPRECATED_fixed_version) to udev, as discussed
 - change the preinst CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED abort to a debconf error note
   warning users about the network, permissions problems if they don't
   install a new kernel

But I know that I may have overlooked some details.  If you see any problems
with my suggestion, please let me know what they are so that I can look for
better solutions.

And if there aren't problems with this proposal, I'm happy to prepare a
patch to the package for this if that would be helpful to you.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#597458: marked as done (release.debian.org: freeze exception for dnsmasq)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:51:54 +0100
with message-id 
<1284933114.12215.13455.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597458: release.debian.org: freeze exception for 
dnsmasq
has caused the Debian Bug report #597458,
regarding release.debian.org: freeze exception for dnsmasq
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597458
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal



A crash problem has recently come to light in the version of dnsmasq in testing 
(2.55-1). The fix is a single line and uncontroversial. An Important bug has 
been filed on this. I've uploaded 2.55-2 to unstable which changes only the 
single line from 2.55-1. It would be great if this could be eased into the 
forthcoming release.

The changelog looks like this:

dnsmasq (2.55-2) unstable; urgency=high
  
   * Fix crash on double free. (closes: #597205)

 -- Simon Kelley   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:45:33 +

Cheers,

Simon.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:14 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> A crash problem has recently come to light in the version of dnsmasq
> in testing (2.55-1). The fix is a single line and uncontroversial. An
> Important bug has been filed on this. I've uploaded 2.55-2 to unstable
> which changes only the single line from 2.55-1. It would be great if
> this could be eased into the forthcoming release.

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Bug#597442: marked as done (nmu: nautilus-sendto_2.28.4-2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:48:02 +0100
with message-id 
<1284932882.12215.13425.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597442: nmu: nautilus-sendto_2.28.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597442,
regarding nmu: nautilus-sendto_2.28.4-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Evolution plugin for nautilus-sendto is non-functional.  Current
libnstevolution.so is linked against libedataserver-1.2.so.11, needs to
be rebuilt to link with libedataserver-1.2.so.13.

nmu nautilus-sendto_2.28.4-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libedataserver1.2-13 
>= 2.30.2.1-1"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 15:23 -0400, Mike Miller wrote:
> Evolution plugin for nautilus-sendto is non-functional.  Current
> libnstevolution.so is linked against libedataserver-1.2.so.11, needs to
> be rebuilt to link with libedataserver-1.2.so.13.
> 
> nmu nautilus-sendto_2.28.4-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libedataserver1.2-13 
> >= 2.30.2.1-1"

Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Bug#597448: marked as done (unblock: tokyocabinet-ruby/1.30-2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:42:41 +0100
with message-id 
<1284932561.12215.13381.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597448: unblock: tokyocabinet-ruby/1.30-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597448,
regarding unblock: tokyocabinet-ruby/1.30-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597448
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package tokyocabinet-ruby

The tokyocabinet-ruby/1.30-2 fix RC Bug#593024, the package failed to build
with ruby 1.9.2 because relative requires no longer work.
And Debian « squeeze » will include Ruby 1.9.2.

unblock tokyocabinet-ruby/1.30-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32.2--std-ipv6-64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:15 +0200, Laurent Arnoud wrote:
> Please unblock package tokyocabinet-ruby
> 
> The tokyocabinet-ruby/1.30-2 fix RC Bug#593024, the package failed to build
> with ruby 1.9.2 because relative requires no longer work.
> And Debian « squeeze » will include Ruby 1.9.2.

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Re: Please let potool into frozen

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 21:38 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> I've uploaded 0.11-2 which contains only a fix for a grave bug:
> 
> potool (0.11-2) unstable; urgency=3Dhigh
> 
>   * Update Polish manpage path in update-alternatives invocation. The wrong
> path (apart from making the Polish manpage version unavailable via 
> 'poedit'
> name) caused postinst failures with lenny's dpkg version, which made it a
> grave bug. Closes: #597321

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284932429.12215.13366.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Bug#597458: release.debian.org: freeze exception for dnsmasq

[Simon Kelley]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal



A crash problem has recently come to light in the version of dnsmasq in testing 
(2.55-1). The fix is a single line and uncontroversial. An Important bug has 
been filed on this. I've uploaded 2.55-2 to unstable which changes only the 
single line from 2.55-1. It would be great if this could be eased into the 
forthcoming release.

The changelog looks like this:

dnsmasq (2.55-2) unstable; urgency=high
  
   * Fix crash on double free. (closes: #597205)

 -- Simon Kelley   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:45:33 +

Cheers,

Simon.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100919211436.30695.4890.report...@spike.thekelleys.org.uk

Bug#597455: unblock: devscripts

[Matt Taggart]

Package: release.debian.org

devscripts contains several fixes needed due to the recent merkel move and 
for backports. From the changelog

* debchange:
[snip]
+ Remove Etch and add Squeeze as backports targets.  Lenny is still the
  default bpo target.
* rmadison: Change Backports URL to backports.debian.org. (Closes: #595714)
* Adjust rmadison documentation for move of accessible projectb mirror
  from merkel to ries.

Please consider unblocking.

Thanks,

-- 
Matt Taggart
tagg...@debian.org





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100919205953.7760ed6...@taggart.lackof.org

Please let potool into frozen

[Marcin Owsiany]

I've uploaded 0.11-2 which contains only a fix for a grave bug:

potool (0.11-2) unstable; urgency=3Dhigh

  * Update Polish manpage path in update-alternatives invocation. The wrong
path (apart from making the Polish manpage version unavailable via 'poedit'
name) caused postinst failures with lenny's dpkg version, which made it a
grave bug. Closes: #597321

 -- Marcin Owsiany   Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:14:37 +0100

-- 
Marcin Owsiany  http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216  FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75  D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100919203804.ga19...@beczulka

Bug#597456: unblock: dpkg/1.15.8.5

[Raphaël Hertzog]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

We made a new dpkg release, it contains:
- the dependency fix for RC bug #596417
  
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=4d6c43090715ea4ed74b376bdc7bff73faaa569a
- important bug fixes
   * Fix dpkg-genchanges to not split the short description in the middle of a
 UTF8 character. Closes: #593442
 
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=f42344b5fb3fda487eb1b7583bd1bd2ec84f2334
   * Drop -k parameter from the tar call used by dpkg-source to extract
 tarballs. Upstream binary files modified by the packager were not properly
 installed due to this. Thanks to James Westby for the report.
 Closes: #594440
 
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=4d2b04f3e62d02a223e12eea1947fde1e3695334
   * Do not print a warning when parsing status or status log files on
 half-installed packages w/o a Description or Maintainer field, as
 this happens normally when the package was never installed before.
 Closes: #594167
 
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=672b0664cbb8fd7fd5eea7ab10af1bbf6871833f
   * Fix possible but improbable segfault in update-alternatives in case
 the master file name contains a format string specifier. Reported by
 Sandro Cazzaniga.
 
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commit;h=dbbd15fe8d972b4f8f3a4d94934a99c507cf0596
- many translations updates
- small doc updates

Note that #594167 can confuse users with invalid warnings during package 
installation.

Note that the commit "Fix realloc usage on compat scandir() implementation."
does not affect Debian since we have scandir in the libc AFAIK.

You can review all the changes here:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/sid

unblock dpkg/1.15.8.5

Thanks in advance.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100919210011.2901.66045.report...@rivendell.localdomain

Bug#597448: unblock: tokyocabinet-ruby/1.30-2

[Laurent Arnoud]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package tokyocabinet-ruby

The tokyocabinet-ruby/1.30-2 fix RC Bug#593024, the package failed to build
with ruby 1.9.2 because relative requires no longer work.
And Debian « squeeze » will include Ruby 1.9.2.

unblock tokyocabinet-ruby/1.30-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32.2--std-ipv6-64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100919201538.20586.71598.report...@r32988.ovh.net

Bug#597442: nmu: nautilus-sendto_2.28.4-2

[Mike Miller]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Evolution plugin for nautilus-sendto is non-functional.  Current
libnstevolution.so is linked against libedataserver-1.2.so.11, needs to
be rebuilt to link with libedataserver-1.2.so.13.

nmu nautilus-sendto_2.28.4-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libedataserver1.2-13 
>= 2.30.2.1-1"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100919192355.27579.93076.report...@tesla

Re: Freeze exception: shadow / possible cron update?

[Christian Kastner]

On 09/19/2010 06:21 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:21:38 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> 
>> Assuming that #596283 will be fixed by a -2 release of shadow, I was
>> wondering whether the Release Team would like a cron -115 as well, with
>> this feature removed from /etc/cron.daily/standard.
>>
> Sounds reasonable.  I'm not sure introducing yet more 'Breaks' is
> necessary though.  The worst case if you're using new cron and old
> shadow is your stuff isn't backed up, right?

That is correct. However, that worst case -- however unlikely -- might
be severe enough to warrant the Breaks:. I'm therefore tending towards
the latter, but will leave the final call up to you.


Christian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c96441a.3040...@kvr.at

Re: initramfs-tools 0.98.3

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

On Montag, 13. September 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:51:23 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Freitag, 10. September 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > After some dicussion in #debian-release, this unblock should
> > > be synced with a newer debian-edu-artwork, please wait for that.
> > > (aka fix of #593707)
> >
> > will try to work on the weekend, wont mind if its done by someone else ;)
>
> -edu, anyone?

right now I'm uploading this to sid:

 debian-edu-artwork (0.0.32-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Drop debian-edu-artwork-usplash. (Closes: #593707)
   * Bump standards version to 3.9.1, no changes needed.


Sorry for the delay. (And the autoreconf changes...)

cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Freeze exception: shadow / possible cron update?

[Julien Cristau]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:21:38 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:

> Assuming that #596283 will be fixed by a -2 release of shadow, I was
> wondering whether the Release Team would like a cron -115 as well, with
> this feature removed from /etc/cron.daily/standard.
> 
Sounds reasonable.  I'm not sure introducing yet more 'Breaks' is
necessary though.  The worst case if you're using new cron and old
shadow is your stuff isn't backed up, right?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: stable proposed update: ser2net, fixing #535159

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 22:50 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> please review the attached patch against ser2net for inclusion in the
> next stable point release. It is supposed to fix #535159, which I
> don't understand zilch, so I applied it verbatim.

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.

Looking at the code, only the changes in the third hunk (around line
583) actually appear to make any practical difference; the others
shouldn't hurt though, for a "belt and braces" approach.

In terms of a stable update, we prefer not to change or introduce patch
systems so the changes should be applied directly via the .diff.gz.  One
also assumes that the copy of config.log from an aborted run was not
intended to be included. :-)

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284912438.12215.10944.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Re: Freeze exception: shadow / possible cron update?

[Christian Kastner]

Hi,

On 08/18/2010 08:31 PM, Nicolas François wrote:
>   * debian/passwd.cron.daily: Handle the backups of the user and group
> databases so that it can be removed from the standard daily cron job.
> Closes: #554170

I only now noticed that this version of shadow entered testing.

Assuming that #596283 will be fixed by a -2 release of shadow, I was
wondering whether the Release Team would like a cron -115 as well, with
this feature removed from /etc/cron.daily/standard.

First, let me point out that keeping both around has zero negative
effects in practice, as both scripts will attempt to backup /etc/passwd
et al only if the backup copy differs from the original -- ie, nothing
is overwritten, as script #2 attempting to perform the backup will just
skip the files already backed up by script #1.

Nevertheless, this redundancy is questionable at best. Should the RT
therefore wish a cron-115, I'd prepare one with a solution analogous to
#541412, where backup of dpkg files was handed over to dpkg.


Christian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c962a82.3040...@kvr.at

Re: Changes for t-p-u of eclipse

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 11:32 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I have attached the packaging changes for eclipse for the t-p-u of
> eclipse. Currently eclipse in testing has been built and silently
> depends on the liblucene2-java in unstable, which this upload intends to
> fix.
>   I have added an "upper bound" to the allowed versions of lucene2 and
> sat4j, so in the very unlikely event that a new upstream version of
> these are introduced in Squeeze, eclipse will become uninstallable[1].

fwiw, britney will then automagically stop newer versions of lucene2 or
sat4j migrating without a large hammer, due to the uninstallability it
would introduce.

Please go ahead with the upload.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284911364.12215.10807.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Re: Freeze exception for Ampache

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 14:33 -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 20:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I have applied the changes you have suggested.  Thx :)
> I have tried to keep changes to a minimum but after release I plan to
> use a state engine for the debconf questions so if the answers to the
> questions is no the installation will exit gracefully.

The postrm fix appears to be missing the final "fi"; the indentation's
now also confusing, but that's possibly my fault for providing a diff
which didn't re-indent to make it clearer where the changes were.

> > fwiw, I also found the wording of the "configure and restart the web
> > server" question slightly confusing, as it suggests that the
> > configuration will be performed in any case and only the restarting will
> > not be done automatically.
> 
> What would you suggest?
> Is it to late in the release cycle to request this from the translation
> team or should this wait until after release?

Reading it through again it's not quite as confusing as I remember. :)
It would be good to make it clearer, but I'm not sure there's any great
rush.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284911078.12215.10774.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Bug#597420: marked as done (unblock: python-csa/0.0.4-1.1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:30:21 +0100
with message-id 
<1284910221.12215.10641.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597420: unblock: python-csa/0.0.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597420,
regarding unblock: python-csa/0.0.4-1.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597420
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package python-csa

It is a NMU to fix an RC bug (#595848)

unblock python-csa/0.0.4-1.1

Thanks & Regards,
Sandro

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.34-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 16:50 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Please unblock package python-csa
> 
> It is a NMU to fix an RC bug (#595848)

Unblocked.

Regards.

Adam

--- End Message ---

Re: possible xorg-server update in lenny?

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 01:29 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I've got a few changes queued up for xorg-server in lenny, and was
> wondering if it's worth uploading them at some point soonish.  I guess I
> could add the fix for CVE-2009-1573 (a minor bug in xvfb-run).

The diffs you provided look okay; assuming the diff for xvfb-run would
be similar to that in #526678, that should be fine as well.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284910268.12215.10651.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Bug#597420: unblock: python-csa/0.0.4-1.1

[Sandro Tosi]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package python-csa

It is a NMU to fix an RC bug (#595848)

unblock python-csa/0.0.4-1.1

Thanks & Regards,
Sandro

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.34-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100919145025.27721.27264.report...@zion.matrix.int

dash situation

[Helmut Grohne]

Dear release team,

[Please CC me in replies, cause I am on neither list.]

I'd like to ping you about the dash situation, because it looks to me
that it can delay the release.

Current status
~~
dash is /bin/sh by default. It currently has three rc bugs.
 * #546528: dash's preinst shouldn't rely on /bin/sh
   This bug has a patch which is almost one year old. I pinged Gerrtit
   about half a year ago without any response. When Marek Kubica tried
   to NMU this patch further problems turned out. Raphael Geissert has
   worked on these problems, but no final solution is in place yet.

 * #538822: dash: fails to install overwriting files from bash
   This bug is also more than one year old. The bug was reproduced on a
   number of different systems. Thorsten Glaser pointed out that this is
   a more general issue preventing other shells from being /bin/sh.
   There have been numerous ideas without deep thought or testing. It
   affects users upgrading from Lenny if they followed README.Debian, so
   it needs to be addressed.

 * #582952: dash / LINENO-support lets many package FTBFS
   autoconf/configure seems to detect a working POSIX shell using
   presence of LINENO, so with this change it started using dash instead
   of bash being bitten by numerous bashisms. The actual bug is not in
   dash, but in far too many packages to fix.

Options
~~~
 * #546528: This seems to be "only" a policy violation and I have not
   found any reports about practical problems. If this is not to be
   fixed, it would be an option to tag this squeeze-ignore.

 * #538822: Must be addressed in some way. Since it only hits upgrading
   users that followed README.Debian, those users could be told to
   revert that change via release-notes.

 * #582952: This one involves either fixing a lot of packages or
   shipping a non-POSIX shell by default. Both of which are bad and
   probably breaking a lot of unrelated stuff. Shipping a non-POSIX dash
   seems to be slightly better to me as this hasn't bothered us so
   far[1].

Another option
~~
Due to the currently bad state of dash it is questionable whether Debian
can release with this shell as /bin/sh. So another option is to ship
bash as /bin/sh again. Not supporting dash as /bin/sh would make the
bugs mentioned above vanish. Beware that newer packages may contain
"dashisms" and thus introduce new problems when switching back to bash.

Question to release team

Since any of these options involves quite fundamental changes to our
distribution they should happen very soon unless we wish to delay the
release. I hereby ask the release team to decide about the provider for
/bin/sh. Any changes either to the /bin/sh symlink or the dash package
should happen very soon. Having a clear message about what these changes
are to be is necessary to make them happen.


Next steps
~~
If anyone is going to work on the mentioned bug reports, please state
that in the bug report. Also note that the dash maintainer has requested
help with the package[2]. Also Raphael Geissert seems to have some plans
about the dash situation[3]. It would be nice if you (Raphael) could
give a status report.

I hope that we can get this set of issues fixed in one way or another.

Helmut

[1] Note that neither dash nor bash do conform to POSIX anyway. For
instance "sh -c 'echo 0:$0 1:$1' - command_name command_option" is
to print "0:command_name 1:command_option" whereas both dash and
bash print "0:- 1:command_option". Some BSDs seem to get this right.
See http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/sh.html
for details.
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/03/msg00589.html
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/03/msg00667.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010091915.ga25...@alf.mars

Freeze exception request for linux2.6 (>=2.6.32-22) in squeeze

[Wenceslao González-Viñas]

Dear all,

I'd like to ask for a freeze exception for linux2.6 (>=2.6.32-22) in  
squeeze ; as it is needed for solving bug #594561


Thanks a lot,

Wenceslao

PS: I already sent a similar email but I think it wasn't in proper formatting


Este mensaje ha sido enviado desde https://webmail.unav.es


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100919164234.15661ex3eii7v...@webmail.unav.es

Re: possible xorg-server update in lenny?

[Florian Weimer]

* Julien Cristau:

> I've got a few changes queued up for xorg-server in lenny, and was
> wondering if it's worth uploading them at some point soonish.  I guess I
> could add the fix for CVE-2009-1573 (a minor bug in xvfb-run).

Yes, please do.  Thanks for taking care of these bugs.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874odlls8t@mid.deneb.enyo.de

Re: Freeze exception for vite

[Julien Cristau]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 15:32:52 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:

> vite (1.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
> 
unblocked.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#597376: unblock: mathgl/1.10.2.1-2

[Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos]

> On 09/19/2010 08:45 AM, Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> > release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
> > 
> > Please unblock package mathgl
> > 
> > Usability of mathgl from python has been added. Html documentation is
> > now usable.
> > 
> 
> Removing some noise from the diff leaves us with:
> 
>   143 files changed, 22012 insertions(+), 24099 deletions(-)
> 
> Isn't it a bit late for such a big change? (and it doesn't fix any RC or
> important bugs).
> 
> Regards,

OK. Let's leave it in the queue.
Thanks for your prompt response.

Regards
Dimitris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201009191636.19688.eftax...@otenet.gr

Re: possible freeze exception for apt-listchanges

[Mehdi Dogguy]

On 09/19/2010 03:33 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> 
> Thanks! I've uploaded 2.85.4 and it's just been ACCEPTED, would you
> please unblock it?
> 

Unblocked.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c9618d9.2090...@dogguy.org

Re: Freeze exception for vite

[Samuel Thibault]

Samuel Thibault, le Sun 19 Sep 2010 14:33:22 +0200, a écrit :
> > > vite (1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
> > > 
> > I don't understand this diff.  configure introduces bashisms,
> > src/core/Core.cpp and src/parser/Line.cpp changes are not documented.
> 
> Mmm, actually it's the converse. Due to the integration of the Debian
> packaging to upstream, -2 apparently dropped the needed changes against
> upstream (which were folded directly into .diff.gz), thus the -3 upload
> to fix the configure call.
> 
> I'll upload a -4 that folds the -1 changes against upstream into a
> separate patch.

Ok, as discussed on IRC, I've actually just put it back into .diff.gz to
make the diff simpler. The changelog is now

vite (1.1-4) unstable; urgency=low

  * Restore changes against upstream which were lost during 1.1-2 upload (and
re-work my workflow to avoid letting this happen).
  * debian/rules: Run ./configure through sh again.

 -- Samuel Thibault   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:44:30 +0200

vite (1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * debian/rules: Run ./configure through bash instead of sh.

 -- Samuel Thibault   Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:56:44 +0200

vite (1.1-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * debian/control:
- Bump libqt4-dev build-dep version to >= 4:4.6, as previous versions get
random crashes with newer X servers.
- Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1 (no change needed).

 -- Samuel Thibault   Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:39:11 +0200

but it actually boils down to just what is announced in the 1.1-2: just
Build-Depends and Standards-Version change in debian/control. I have
also added information about the aforementioned changes against upstream
in the 1.1-1 changelog entry where it should have been:

  * configure: Cherry-pick upstream fixes to fix bashisms.
  * src/core/Core.cpp, src/parser/Line.cpp: Cherry-pick upstream fixes to fix
build.

Samuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100919133252.ge7...@const.famille.thibault.fr

Bug#597357: marked as done (unblock: cairo/1.8.10-6)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:44:04 +0200
with message-id <4c9613a4.4030...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597357: unblock: cairo/1.8.10-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #597357,
regarding unblock: cairo/1.8.10-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597357: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597357
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock the latest cairo upload.

cairo (1.8.10-6) unstable; urgency=low 
.
   * debian/patches/02_iceweasel-buggy-repeat.patch:
 + Revert logic of the patch for the infamous iceweasel rendering
   problems. The only broken X11 driver that is left seems to be
   fglrx and always enabling the workaround code in cairo causes
   severe performance degradations for everybody (Closes: #594245).
   Thanks for Josselin Mouette for the patch.
   Everybody using the fglrx driver should set the MOZ_CAIRO_BUGGY_REPEAT
   environment variable, everybody else should get a correctly working
   and fast cairo again.

I’m attaching the new version of the patch.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling
Index: cairo/src/cairo-xlib-display.c
===
--- cairo.orig/src/cairo-xlib-display.c	2010-08-17 05:52:51.868996101 +0200
+++ cairo/src/cairo-xlib-display.c	2010-08-17 05:52:54.692995371 +0200
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
 
 static cairo_xlib_display_t *_cairo_xlib_display_list;
 
+static int buggy_repeat_force = -1;
+
 static void
 _cairo_xlib_remove_close_display_hook_internal (cairo_xlib_display_t *display,
 		cairo_xlib_hook_t *hook);
@@ -338,6 +340,17 @@
 	display->buggy_repeat = TRUE;
 }
 
+/* XXX workaround; see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413583 */
+if (buggy_repeat_force == -1) {
+if (getenv("MOZ_CAIRO_BUGGY_REPEAT"))
+buggy_repeat_force = 1;
+else
+buggy_repeat_force = 0;
+}
+
+if (buggy_repeat_force)
+display->buggy_repeat = TRUE;
+
 display->next = _cairo_xlib_display_list;
 _cairo_xlib_display_list = display;
 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/19/2010 02:11 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 19 septembre 2010 à 11:12 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
>> On 09/19/2010 12:05 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>> Everybody using the fglrx driver should set the 
>>> MOZ_CAIRO_BUGGY_REPEAT environment variable, everybody else 
>>> should get a correctly working and fast cairo again.
>> 
>> Isn't it worth mentioning such a change in debian/NEWS? So that 
>> users are actually aware of the behaviour change.
> 
> I think it should be documented in fglrx instead. The behavior of 
> 1.8.10-5 is buggy anyway, so we just came back and gave fglrx users 
> an opportunity to have a working gecko/webkit.
> 
> However nobody is going to look for the solution in the cairo 
> documentation. Ideally, I’d even say this variable should be set by 
> fglrx in a Xsession startup script if the driver is being used, 
> instead of being documented (remember, no one reads documentation).
> 

Fair enough. I CC'ed fglrx maintainers so that they are aware of this
change and can document it somehow. It think it's worth mentioning in
the Release Notes, no?

Unblocked.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---

Re: possible freeze exception for apt-listchanges

[Sandro Tosi]

Hi,

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 14:58, Mehdi Dogguy  wrote:
> On 09/19/2010 02:56 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'd like to upload apt-listchanges with a fix for #593224 (french po
>> translation) but I have also this changes ready:
>> http://paste.debian.net/90422/ (they are: better guess the encoding to
>> use, make apt-lc be interruptible with ctrl+c and a file to help
>> building it)
>>
>> Would you accept an upload with both in it?
>>
>
> Yes.

Thanks! I've uploaded 2.85.4 and it's just been ACCEPTED, would you
please unblock it?

Regards,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=yo+ohwusntov9hwoma14ekuay+kvxkc8ut...@mail.gmail.com

Re: possible freeze exception for apt-listchanges

[Mehdi Dogguy]

On 09/19/2010 02:56 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd like to upload apt-listchanges with a fix for #593224 (french po
> translation) but I have also this changes ready:
> http://paste.debian.net/90422/ (they are: better guess the encoding to
> use, make apt-lc be interruptible with ctrl+c and a file to help
> building it)
> 
> Would you accept an upload with both in it?
> 

Yes.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c9608db.1030...@dogguy.org

possible freeze exception for apt-listchanges

[Sandro Tosi]

Hello,
I'd like to upload apt-listchanges with a fix for #593224 (french po
translation) but I have also this changes ready:
http://paste.debian.net/90422/ (they are: better guess the encoding to
use, make apt-lc be interruptible with ctrl+c and a file to help
building it)

Would you accept an upload with both in it?

Thanks in advance & Regards,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimvf5h6rhuex+d=0ujydchfxw_ub=xbdfuna...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Freeze exceptions for a bunch of packages

[Samuel Thibault]

Julien Cristau, le Sun 19 Sep 2010 14:03:10 +0200, a écrit :
> > mbrola_3.01h-6
> 
> Does the path change break any of the existing packages in squeeze?

Only speech-dispatcher uses mbrola ATM, and without this fix it doesn't
work.

> > mbrola-af1_0.0.20040426-2
> 
> why the debhelper dependency bump?  debian/compat says 5.

In my memory (that was changed months ago) it was just a routine update.

> > liblouisxml (2.2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
> 
> Why do watch and copyright have different download urls?

Well, the problem is that upstream has several websites. The stable
website seems to be google, but newer updates appear on abilitiessoft
first (and then they might remember to update google after that).
abilitiessoft used to be jbb-software before, that's why I consider the
google website more stable for upstream location.

> > speakup (3.1.5.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
> 
> There's some sort of dkms work not mentioned in changelog?

It is actually not enabled, precisely because we're frozen (it was added
just before the freeze), see the speakup binary package being commented
in debian/control.

> debian/speakup.{prerm,postinst} have the #DEBHELPER# token twice.

These aren't actually used atm because the speakup binary package is not
built.  But yes, now dropped in our git repo.

> > vite (1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
> > 
> I don't understand this diff.  configure introduces bashisms,
> src/core/Core.cpp and src/parser/Line.cpp changes are not documented.

Mmm, actually it's the converse. Due to the integration of the Debian
packaging to upstream, -2 apparently dropped the needed changes against
upstream (which were folded directly into .diff.gz), thus the -3 upload
to fix the configure call.

I'll upload a -4 that folds the -1 changes against upstream into a
separate patch.

Samuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100919123322.gb7...@const.famille.thibault.fr

Bug#597357: unblock: cairo/1.8.10-6

[Josselin Mouette]

Le dimanche 19 septembre 2010 à 11:12 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit : 
> On 09/19/2010 12:05 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Everybody using the fglrx driver should set the
> > MOZ_CAIRO_BUGGY_REPEAT environment variable, everybody else should
> > get a correctly working and fast cairo again.
> 
> Isn't it worth mentioning such a change in debian/NEWS? So that users are
> actually aware of the behaviour change.

I think it should be documented in fglrx instead. The behavior of
1.8.10-5 is buggy anyway, so we just came back and gave fglrx users an
opportunity to have a working gecko/webkit.

However nobody is going to look for the solution in the cairo
documentation. Ideally, I’d even say this variable should be set by
fglrx in a Xsession startup script if the driver is being used, instead
of being documented (remember, no one reads documentation).

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Freeze exceptions for a bunch of packages

[Julien Cristau]

On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 19:08:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:

> isorelax_2004-4

unblocked

> jing-trang_2009-3

unblocked

> jodconverter_2.2.2-4

unblocked

> jodconverter-cli_2.2.2-5

unblocked

> joptsimple_3.1-3
> 
unblocked.

> mbrola_3.01h-6

Does the path change break any of the existing packages in squeeze?

> mbrola-af1_0.0.20040426-2

why the debhelper dependency bump?  debian/compat says 5.

> mbrola-br3_2.021-2
> mbrola-cr1_0.0.19981028-2
> mbrola-cz2_0.2-2
> mbrola-de6_0.0.20021125-2
> mbrola-de7_0.0.20030404-2
> mbrola-es1_0.0.19980610-2
> mbrola-fr4_0.0.19990521-2
> mbrola-gr2_0.0.20010521-2
> mbrola-hu1_1.002-2
> mbrola-id1_1-2
> mbrola-it3_0.1-2
> mbrola-it4_0.1-2
> mbrola-la1_0.0.20050615-2
> mbrola-nl2_0.5-2
> mbrola-pl1_0.1-2
> mbrola-pt1_1.0-2
> mbrola-ro1_1.00-2
> mbrola-sw1_1.00-2
> mbrola-sw2_1.0-2
> mbrola-us2_0.1-2
> 
> 
> liblouisxml (2.2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
> 
Why do watch and copyright have different download urls?

> speakup (3.1.5.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
> 
There's some sort of dkms work not mentioned in changelog?

debian/speakup.{prerm,postinst} have the #DEBHELPER# token twice.

> vite (1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
> 
I don't understand this diff.  configure introduces bashisms,
src/core/Core.cpp and src/parser/Line.cpp changes are not documented.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#595424: unblock: live-manual/2.0~a6-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 595424 + pending
Bug #595424 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-manual/2.0~a7-1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595424: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595424
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128489708821504.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#595424: unblock: live-manual/2.0~a6-1

[Mehdi Dogguy]

tags 595424 + pending
thanks

On 09/19/2010 01:32 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 09/19/2010 01:13 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> Don't you need some Conflicts/Replaces to ensure smooth upgrades?
> 
> no, there are no file conflicts (remember layout changes?).
> 

Oh, you're right. I asked -ftp folks to accept live-manual (if they have
some spare time :)). Please avoid packaging changes in future uploads if
you want to have recent revisions in Squeeze.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95f8ae.3050...@dogguy.org

Bug#595424: unblock: live-manual/2.0~a6-1

[Daniel Baumann]

On 09/19/2010 01:13 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Don't you need some Conflicts/Replaces to ensure smooth upgrades?

no, there are no file conflicts (remember layout changes?).

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95f4e...@debian.org

Re: Please appove crafty 23.3-1~squeeze1 was: Re: Accepted crafty 23.3-1~squeeze1 (source amd64)

[Mehdi Dogguy]

On 09/17/2010 05:54 PM, Oliver Korff wrote:
> 
> I saw, that my fix for the FTBFS-bug in the package could not enter 
> testing, even after the unblock of the release-team. This is caused
> by a new upload of libnuma1:
> 
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crafty.html testing migration
> excuses: Section: non-free/games - 26 days old (needed 10 days) -
> Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by zobel -
> Valid candidate - Invalidated by dependency - Not considered -
> Depends: crafty numactl (not considered)
> 
> So I privately asked zobel from the release-team, how to proceed. He 
> told me that I could upload a ~squeeze1 package (built in a testing 
> chroot) to testing-proposed-updates.
> 

zobel approved the Squeeze upload… so it should be fine now. For further
comments, you can ask privately zobel again :)

Next time, please send a mail to -release.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95f30b.40...@debian.org

Re: [britney] RFC: Behaviour change for "approve" hints

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 07:50 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 09/19/2010 12:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 
> > As a consequence of all of the above, I'd like to propose modifying the
> > semantics of "approve" so that the hint can be added straight away and
> > the t-p-u package only becomes a valid candidate once it's available on
> > all the architectures on which it exists in testing; the attached patch
> > does so.
> 
> Finally that missing feature will be implemented! :-)

One thing that's worth mentioning is that the output is slightly
different from the existing out-of-date checks for unstable:

- the excuse says "not yet built on $arch"
- the check purely says "has the tpu package produced any binaries on
$arch" rather than "has the tpu package produced all the binaries on
$arch which the testing package produced"

If people would particularly like it changed so that each of the missing
binaries relative to the testing package are listed then I'll look at
adding that.

Cheers,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284895605.12215.8901.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Bug#595424: unblock: live-manual/2.0~a6-1

[Mehdi Dogguy]

On 09/19/2010 01:52 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> retitle 595424 unblock: live-manual/2.0~a7-1 thanks
> 
> live-manual (1:2.0~a7-1) unstable; urgency=low
> 

Don't you need some Conflicts/Replaces to ensure smooth upgrades? (you
moved files from the main binary package to another binary package).
Admittedly live-manual is not present in lenny but Squeeze users will
encounter the upgrade problem.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95f050.8090...@dogguy.org

Bug#597392: marked as done (unblock: gitosis/0.2+20090917-10)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:01:00 +0200
with message-id <4c95ed6c.8020...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597392: unblock: gitosis/0.2+20090917-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #597392,
regarding unblock: gitosis/0.2+20090917-10
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597392: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597392
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org

gitosis (0.2+20090917-10) unstable; urgency=low

  * Adding updated debconf translations from Vincenzo Campanella
 (Closes: #597309).

 -- Daniel Baumann   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:51:07 +0200

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/19/2010 12:55 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> 
> gitosis (0.2+20090917-10) unstable; urgency=low
> 

Unblocked.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---

Bug#597391: marked as done (unblock: tftp-hpa/5.0.16)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:05:22 +0200
with message-id <4c95ee72.3040...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597391: unblock: tftp-hpa/5.0.16
has caused the Debian Bug report #597391,
regarding unblock: tftp-hpa/5.0.16
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597391: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597391
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org

tftp-hpa (5.0-16) unstable; urgency=low

  * Adding updated debconf translations from Vincenzo Campanella
 (Closes: #597314).

 -- Daniel Baumann   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:45:25 +0200

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/19/2010 12:49 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> 
> tftp-hpa (5.0-16) unstable; urgency=low
> 

Unblocked.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---

Bug#597392: unblock: gitosis/0.2+20090917-10

[Philipp Kern]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:55:57PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> 
> gitosis (0.2+20090917-10) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * Adding updated debconf translations from Vincenzo Campanella
>  (Closes: #597309).
> 
>  -- Daniel Baumann   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:51:07 +0200

Would you mind sending the unblock requests after them being accepted,
given that you're only sending a changelog entry anyway?

Thanks,
Philipp Kern 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#597231: marked as done (unblock glib2.0/2.24.2-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:55:15 +0200
with message-id <4c95ec13.4070...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597231: unblock glib2.0/2.24.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597231,
regarding unblock glib2.0/2.24.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597231
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock glib2.0 for squeeze.

glib2.0 (2.24.2-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Drop type-handling usage. Closes: #587863.
  * Bump standards version accordingly.
  * Ship gio-querymodules in a versioned directory.
  * Run it on installation, not only when triggered.
  * Purge the modules cache in the postrm.
  * New upstream bugfix release.
+ Works around the race condition in gtester that causes random 
  FTBFSes.

Note that I’m not sure of the last changelog entry, since the powerpc
build failed :/ 

I’m attaching the diff for source files.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling

--- glib-2.24.1/gio/gconverteroutputstream.c	2010-04-13 13:33:15.0 +
+++ glib-2.24.2/gio/gconverteroutputstream.c	2010-08-08 14:47:15.0 +
@@ -418,12 +418,16 @@
   converted_bytes = 0;
   while (!priv->finished && converted_bytes < to_convert_size)
 {
+  /* Ensure we have *some* target space */
+  if (buffer_tailspace (&priv->converted_buffer) == 0)
+	grow_buffer (&priv->converted_buffer);
+
   /* Try to convert to our buffer */
   my_error = NULL;
   res = g_converter_convert (priv->converter,
  to_convert + converted_bytes,
  to_convert_size - converted_bytes,
- buffer_data (&priv->converted_buffer),
+ buffer_data (&priv->converted_buffer) + buffer_available (&priv->converted_buffer),
  buffer_tailspace (&priv->converted_buffer),
  0,
  &bytes_read,
@@ -529,12 +533,16 @@
   flushed = FALSE;
   while (!priv->finished && !flushed)
 {
+  /* Ensure we have *some* target space */
+  if (buffer_tailspace (&priv->converted_buffer) == 0)
+	grow_buffer (&priv->converted_buffer);
+
   /* Try to convert to our buffer */
   my_error = NULL;
   res = g_converter_convert (priv->converter,
  buffer_data (&priv->output_buffer),
  buffer_available (&priv->output_buffer),
- buffer_data (&priv->converted_buffer),
+ buffer_data (&priv->converted_buffer) + buffer_available (&priv->converted_buffer),
  buffer_tailspace (&priv->converted_buffer),
  is_closing ? G_CONVERTER_INPUT_AT_END : G_CONVERTER_FLUSH,
  &bytes_read,
--- glib-2.24.1/gio/tests/converter-stream.c	2010-04-13 13:33:16.0 +
+++ glib-2.24.2/gio/tests/converter-stream.c	2010-08-08 14:47:15.0 +
@@ -558,6 +558,59 @@
   g_object_unref (compressor);
 }
 
+#define DATA_LENGTH 100
+
+static void
+test_corruption (void)
+{
+  GError *error = NULL;
+  guint32 *data0, *data1;
+  gsize data1_size;
+  gint i;
+  GInputStream *istream0, *istream1, *cistream1;
+  GOutputStream *ostream1, *ostream2, *costream1;
+  GConverter *compressor, *decompressor;
+
+  data0 = g_malloc (DATA_LENGTH * sizeof (guint32));
+  for (i = 0; i < DATA_LENGTH; i++)
+data0[i] = g_random_int ();
+
+  istream0 = g_memory_input_stream_new_from_data (data0,
+DATA_LENGTH * sizeof (guint32), NULL);
+
+  ostream1 = g_memory_output_stream_new (NULL, 0, g_realloc, NULL);
+  compressor = G_CONVERTER (g_zlib_compressor_new (
+G_ZLIB_COMPRESSOR_FORMAT_GZIP, -1));
+  costream1 = g_converter_output_stream_new (ostream1, compressor);
+
+  g_output_stream_splice (costream1, istream0, 0, NULL, &error);
+  g_assert_no_error (error);
+
+  g_object_unref (costream1);
+  g_object_unref (compressor);
+  data1 = g_memory_output_stream_get_data (G_MEMORY_OUTPUT_STREAM (ostream1));
+  data1_size = g_memory_output_stream_get_data_size (
+G_MEMORY_OUTPUT_STREAM (ostream1));
+  g_object_unref (ostream1);
+  g_object_unref (istream0);
+
+  istream1 = g_memory_input_stream_new_from_data (data1, data1_size, NULL);
+  decompressor = G_CONVERTER (g_zlib_decompressor_new (
+  G_ZLIB_COMPRESSOR_FORMAT_GZIP));
+  cistream1 = g_converter_input_stream_new (istream1, decompressor);
+
+  ostream2 = g_memory_output_stream_new (NULL, 0, g_realloc, NULL);
+
+  g_output_

Re: Please unblock libunique

[Mehdi Dogguy]

On 09/19/2010 12:50 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> libunique didn't depend on dbus, but requires it at runtime.  This NMU
> rectifies this.  Please unblock it.
> 
> libunique (1.1.6-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> 

Unblocked.

Cheers,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95ec82.8090...@dogguy.org

Bug#596364: marked as done (unblock: cracklib2/2.8.16-4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:55:05 +0200
with message-id <20100919105505.ga32...@thrall.0x539.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#596364: unblock: cracklib2/2.8.16-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #596364,
regarding unblock: cracklib2/2.8.16-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596364: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596364
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package cracklib2

it includes a bugfix for RC bug #596281. A diff to the previous
version is attached.

unblock cracklib2/2.8.16-3


Regards
Jan Dittberner

-- 
Jan Dittberner - Debian Developer
GPG-key: 4096R/558FB8DD 2009-05-10
 B2FF 1D95 CE8F 7A22 DF4C  F09B A73E 0055 558F B8DD
http://ddportfolio.debian.net/ - http://people.debian.org/~jandd/
diff -Nru cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/changelog cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/changelog
--- cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/changelog	2010-05-13 11:59:02.0 +0200
+++ cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/changelog	2010-09-10 18:44:28.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+cracklib2 (2.8.16-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/control: update to Standards-Version to 3.9.1
+- use Breaks instead of Conflicts for libcrack2's incompatibility with
+  cracklib2 (<< 2.8.12-1) and libcrack2-dev's incompatibility with
+  cracklib2-dev (<< 2.8.12-1)
+  * add debian/patches/596281-fix-python-extension-segfault.patch: in
+cracklib-python's C module, make sure we initialize defaultdict to
+NULL at the start of _cracklib_FascistCheck. This fixes a bug where
+that variable was freed when not NULL without ever having been
+assigned any value to.  This happened when we called FascistCheck()
+with a dictionary path of our own. Thanks to Peter Palfrader for the
+patch (Closes: #596281).
+
+ -- Jan Dittberner   Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:44:23 +0200
+
 cracklib2 (2.8.16-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * fix bashism in debian/rules (Closes: #581479)
diff -Nru cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/control cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/control
--- cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/control	2010-05-13 11:59:02.0 +0200
+++ cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/control	2010-09-10 18:44:28.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Jan Dittberner 
 Uploaders: Martin Pitt 
-Standards-Version: 3.8.4
+Standards-Version: 3.9.1
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50), python-support (>= 1.0.2),
  python-all-dev, python-all, chrpath, xmlto, automake (>= 1.10),
  autoconf (>=2.61), libtool, python-setuptools
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
 Recommends: cracklib-runtime
-Conflicts: cracklib2.6, cracklib2 (<< 2.8.12-1)
+Conflicts: cracklib2.6
+Breaks: cracklib2 (<< 2.8.12-1)
 Provides: cracklib2
 Replaces: cracklib2.6, cracklib2 (<< 2.8.12-1)
 Description: pro-active password checker library
@@ -33,7 +34,8 @@
 Depends: libcrack2 (=${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}
 Recommends: cracklib-runtime
 Provides: cracklib-dev, cracklib2-dev
-Conflicts: cracklib-dev, cracklib2-dev (<< 2.8.12-1)
+Conflicts: cracklib-dev
+Breaks: cracklib2-dev (<< 2.8.12-1)
 Replaces: cracklib-dev, cracklib2-dev (<< 2.8.12-1)
 Description: pro-active password checker library - development files
  Header files, static libraries, documentation, and symbolic links
diff -Nru cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/patches/596281-fix-python-extension-segfault.patch cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/patches/596281-fix-python-extension-segfault.patch
--- cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/patches/596281-fix-python-extension-segfault.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/patches/596281-fix-python-extension-segfault.patch	2010-09-10 18:44:28.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+Subject: Fix for segmentation fault in the Python extension
+Author: Peter Palfrader 
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596281
+--- a/python/_cracklibmodule.c
 b/python/_cracklibmodule.c
+@@ -64,7 +64,8 @@
+ static PyObject *
+ _cracklib_FascistCheck(PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwargs)
+ {
+-char *candidate, *dict, *defaultdict;
++char *candidate, *dict;
++char *defaultdict = NULL;
+ const char *result;
+ struct stat st;
+ char *keywords[] = {"pw", "dictpath", NULL};
+--- a/python/Makefile.am
 b/python/Makefile.am
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ if BUILD_PYTHON
+ python_PYTHON = cracklib.py
+ pyexec_LTLIBRARIES = _cracklibmodule.la
+-AM_CFLAGS = -I$(top_srcdir)/lib
++AM_CFLAGS = -I$(top_srcdir)/lib -Wall
+ _cracklibmodule_la_L

Bug#597392: unblock: gitosis/0.2+20090917-10

[Daniel Baumann]

Package: release.debian.org

gitosis (0.2+20090917-10) unstable; urgency=low

  * Adding updated debconf translations from Vincenzo Campanella
 (Closes: #597309).

 -- Daniel Baumann   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:51:07 +0200

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95ec3d.3040...@debian.org

Bug#597391: unblock: tftp-hpa/5.0.16

[Daniel Baumann]

Package: release.debian.org

tftp-hpa (5.0-16) unstable; urgency=low

  * Adding updated debconf translations from Vincenzo Campanella
 (Closes: #597314).

 -- Daniel Baumann   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:45:25 +0200

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95ea9e.5010...@debian.org

Please unblock libunique

[Philipp Kern]

libunique didn't depend on dbus, but requires it at runtime.  This NMU
rectifies this.  Please unblock it.

libunique (1.1.6-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Depend on both dbus and dbus-x11 which are required by libunique
unconditionally when using the dbus backend (compile-time setting).
(Closes: #497401, #595480, #595480)
  * Correct upstream source location in `debian/copyright'.
(Closes: #574352)

 -- Philipp Kern   Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:00:16 +0200

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596939: future unblock: kdepim-runtime/4:4.4.6-1

[Modestas Vainius]

Hello,

On sekmadienis 19 Rugsėjis 2010 12:55:16 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > On penktadienis 17 Rugsėjis 2010 16:03:47 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >> On 15/09/2010 10:55, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> >>> Would you grant a freeze exception for this package after it spends
> >>> some time in unstable? Thank you for considering.
> >> 
> >> Yes.
> > 
> > Uploaded.
> 
> The mailed diff didn't contain all the changes…
> 
> Unblocked.

The mail had upstream changes only :) In addition, I fixed RC bug yesterday.

-- 
Modestas Vainius 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#596939: marked as done (unblock: kdepim-runtime/4:4.4.6-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:55:16 +0200
with message-id <4c95de04.80...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#596939: future unblock: kdepim-runtime/4:4.4.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596939,
regarding unblock: kdepim-runtime/4:4.4.6-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596939
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Hello,

I would like to hear your opinion before uploading. KDE has recently released a
new patch release (4.4.6) for its kdepim suite 4.4.x series (kdepim-runtime and
kdepim source packages in Debian). KDE has a rather strict policy what goes
into its patch releases (no new features, only bug fixes). So I think it makes
much sense to release Squeeze with the latest bugfix version from upstream
because a few months of bug fixing went into kdepim* 4.4.6. Also please note
that 4.4.6 is probably the last release of the old kdepim* codebase while
upstream is actively working on the kdepim* 4.5 which is >70% rewrite so to
speak. In my opinion, this makes the update even more important given the
length of the Debian stable lifecycle.

Speaking strictly about kdepim-runtime source package, the upstream diff is
really small (see below). So would you grant a freeze exception for this
package after it spends some time in unstable? Thank you for considering.

$ diff -uNr kdepim-runtime-4.4.5 kdepim-runtime-4.4.6 | diffstat
 .krazy|3 ---
 resources/imap/imapresource.cpp   |2 +-
 resources/imap/settings.cpp   |6 --
 resources/mailtransport_dummy/Messages.sh |2 +-
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
$ diff -uNr kdepim-runtime-4.4.5 kdepim-runtime-4.4.6
diff -uNr kdepim-runtime-4.4.5/.krazy kdepim-runtime-4.4.6/.krazy
--- kdepim-runtime-4.4.5/.krazy 2009-12-14 12:54:44.0 +0200
+++ kdepim-runtime-4.4.6/.krazy 1970-01-01 03:00:00.0 +0300
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-SKIP /libkdepim-copy/\|/resources/openchange/
-EXTRA defines,kdebug,null,qenums,tipsandthis
-STRICT super
diff -uNr kdepim-runtime-4.4.5/resources/imap/imapresource.cpp 
kdepim-runtime-4.4.6/resources/imap/imapresource.cpp
--- kdepim-runtime-4.4.5/resources/imap/imapresource.cpp2010-01-06 
19:00:55.0 +0200
+++ kdepim-runtime-4.4.6/resources/imap/imapresource.cpp2010-09-10 
02:32:13.0 +0300
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
   if ( userRejected ) {
 emit status( Broken, i18n( "Could not read the password: user rejected 
wallet access." ) );
 return;
-  } else if ( password.isEmpty() ) {
+  } else if ( password.isEmpty() && (Settings::self()->authentication() != 7 
/* Not GSSAPI */) ) { 
 emit status( Broken, i18n( "Authentication failed." ) );
 return;
   } else {
diff -uNr kdepim-runtime-4.4.5/resources/imap/settings.cpp 
kdepim-runtime-4.4.6/resources/imap/settings.cpp
--- kdepim-runtime-4.4.5/resources/imap/settings.cpp2009-12-14 
12:54:43.0 +0200
+++ kdepim-runtime-4.4.6/resources/imap/settings.cpp2010-09-10 
02:32:13.0 +0300
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
 
 K_GLOBAL_STATIC( SettingsHelper, s_globalSettings )
 
+static const int s_ModeGSSAPI = 7;
+
 Settings *Settings::self()
 {
 if ( !s_globalSettings->q ) {
@@ -68,7 +70,7 @@
 
 void Settings::requestPassword()
 {
-  if ( !m_password.isEmpty() ) {
+  if ( !m_password.isEmpty() || ( authentication() == s_ModeGSSAPI ) ) {
 emit passwordRequestCompleted( m_password, false );
   } else {
 Wallet *wallet = Wallet::openWallet( Wallet::NetworkWallet(), m_winId, 
Wallet::Asynchronous );
@@ -118,7 +120,7 @@
   *userRejected = false;
 }
 
-if ( !m_password.isEmpty() )
+if ( !m_password.isEmpty() || ( authentication() == s_ModeGSSAPI ) )
   return m_password;
 Wallet* wallet = Wallet::openWallet( Wallet::NetworkWallet(), m_winId );
 if ( wallet && wallet->isOpen() && wallet->hasFolder( "imap" ) ) {
diff -uNr kdepim-runtime-4.4.5/resources/mailtransport_dummy/Messages.sh 
kdepim-runtime-4.4.6/resources/mailtransport_dummy/Messages.sh
--- kdepim-runtime-4.4.5/resources/mailtransport_dummy/Messages.sh  
2009-12-14 12:54:44.0 +0200
+++ kdepim-runtime-4.4.6/resources/mailtransport_dummy/Messages.sh  
2010-09-10 02:32:16.0 +0300
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 #! /usr/bin/env bash
-$XGETTEXT *.cpp -o $podir/akonadi_mailtransport_resource.pot
+$XGETTEXT *.cpp -o $podir/akonadi_mailtransport_dum

Bug#597339: marked as done (unblock: python-django/1.2.3-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:51:46 +0200
with message-id <4c95dd32.1060...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597339: unblock: python-django/1.2.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597339,
regarding unblock: python-django/1.2.3-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597339: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597339
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock python-django 1.2.3-1

This is a new upstream micro-release, it contains a security fix for
#596205 and many small bugfixes. The debdiff is rather large but
upstream is very sane when it comes with release management
and there are no new features, only bugfixes and
documentation/translation updates.

Upstream release policy if you want to learn more:
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/internals/release-process/

The debdiff on the binary package shows removed files and also changed
dependencies, this is because the previous version was built with multiple
python installed and some files ended up on version-specific path when
there was no good reason for this (I'll file a bug on debhelper for this).

Feel free to let it age the normal 10 days period before the migration to
ensure it contains no regression.

unblock python-django/1.2.3-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/18/2010 08:52 PM, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock python-django 1.2.3-1
> 

Done.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---

Bug#595422: marked as done (unblock: live-config/2.0.6-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:37:42 +0200
with message-id <4c95d9e6.8050...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#595422: unblock: live-config/2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595422,
regarding unblock: live-config/2.0.6-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
595422: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595422
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org

live-config (2.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Using config.d instead of config.conf.d as directory name for custom
configuration files.
  * Updating live-installer-launcher script for debian-installer-
launcher rename.

 -- Daniel Baumann   Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:33:04 +0200

live-config (2.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Updating live-build reference in live-config manpage.
  * Renumbering config scripts.
  * Rewriting TODO file.

 -- Daniel Baumann   Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:35:50 +0200

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/15/2010 12:29 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> retitle 595422 unblock: live-config/2.0.6-1
> thanks
> 
> live-config (2.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> 

Done.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---

Bug#595420: marked as done (unblock: live-boot/2.0.5-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:35:21 +0200
with message-id <4c95d959.4070...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#595420: unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595420,
regarding unblock: live-boot/2.0.5-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
595420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595420
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org

live-boot (2.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Exiting with 0 in live-boot bug script (Closes: #595262).
  * Using boot.d instead of boot.conf.d as directory name for custom
configuration files.

 -- Daniel Baumann   Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:43:03 +0200

live-boot (2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Updating seperators in networking bottom script to fix ip parameter
parsing (Closes: #590494).
  * Updating live-build reference in manpages.
  * Checking for file existence in initramfs hook (Closes: #595264).
  * Adding live-toram script to copy the running live system to ram and
eject the live media.

 -- Daniel Baumann   Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:25:12 +0200

live-boot (2.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low

  [ Michael Prokop ]
  * Adding workaround for aufs issue in kernel versions around 2.6.33.

  [ Daniel Baumann ]
  * Using allow-hotplug instead of auto in automatically created
/etc/network/interfaces file.

 -- Daniel Baumann   Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:25:08 +0200

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/14/2010 01:14 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> retitle 595420 unblock: live-boot/2.0.5-1
> thanks
> 
> live-boot (2.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   [ Marco Amadori ]
>   * Fix snapshots' sync-strings usage (Closes: #591330).
>   * Fixed some snapshot related debug messages.
>   * Added support for empty (initial) snapshots.
> 
>   [ Daniel Baumann ]
>   * Adding patch from Colin Watson  to follow
> symlinks when checking for dynamically linked files at reboot in
> initscript.
> 
>  -- Daniel Baumann   Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:55:02 +0200
> 

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---

Bug#597356: marked as done (unblock: mtkbabel/0.8.2-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:26:30 +0200
with message-id <4c95d746.20...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597356: unblock: mtkbabel/0.8.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597356,
regarding unblock: mtkbabel/0.8.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597356: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597356
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package mtkbabel.

It contains two fixes which work around bugs with two different GPS
devices (the rest of the changelog is mostly cosmetic stuff).

The changelog is:
  * New upstream release.
+ Fixes "Doesn't work with Holux M-241 firmware 1.13" (Closes: #572942).
+ Fixes Transystem GPS Trip Recorder 747A+ memory issue (Closes: #526809).
  * Standards-Version: 3.9.1 (no changes required).
  * debian/patches/10_manpage_hyphen_fix.patch: Drop, merged upstream.
  * debian/patches/20_help_fix.patch: Drop, merged upstream.
  * debian/mtkbabel.lintian-overrides: Drop, no longer needed.
  * Small updates in the package description and copyright file.

unblock mtkbabel/0.8.2-1


Thanks for considering, Uwe.
-- 
http://hermann-uwe.de | http://sigrok.org
http://randomprojects.org | http://unmaintained-free-software.org


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/18/2010 11:25 PM, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> 
> unblock mtkbabel/0.8.2-1
> 

Unblocked.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---

Bug#597357: unblock: cairo/1.8.10-6

[Mehdi Dogguy]

On 09/19/2010 12:05 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Everybody using the fglrx driver should set the
> MOZ_CAIRO_BUGGY_REPEAT environment variable, everybody else should
> get a correctly working and fast cairo again.

Isn't it worth mentioning such a change in debian/NEWS? So that users are
actually aware of the behaviour change.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95d402.7080...@dogguy.org

Re: [britney] RFC: Behaviour change for "approve" hints

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 08:14 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100919 01:39]:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:04:59 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > 
> > > * Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]:
> > > > [ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all
> > > > architectures to be built in t-p-u before paying any attention to an
> > > > "approve" hint ]
> > > 
> > > cool. can we please as well get an force-approve? ;=)
> > > 
> > Couldn't that just be separate force and approve?
> 
> if that works, why not?

It should work anywhere that just approving would work now; the approve
checks would set updatecand to 0 and force would just set it back to 1
again.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284887819.12215.7975.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Bug#597370: marked as done (unblock: xorg/1:7.5+7)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:05:40 +0200
with message-id <4c95d264.4040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597370: unblock: xorg/1:7.5+7
has caused the Debian Bug report #597370,
regarding unblock: xorg/1:7.5+7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597370: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597370
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

The main reason for this request is #567909, the rest is mostly
cosmetic.

+xorg (1:7.5+7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ Julien Cristau ]
+  * Nuke x11-common's Conflicts.  This was needed for upgrades from the
+monolith, which aren't relevant anymore.
+  * Also drop Pre-Depends on debconf.  The debconf interaction in
+x11-common.preinst was removed in 1:7.4+2.
+  * Drop versioned build-dep on dpkg 1.7.0.  Even woody had that..
+  * Drop x11-common Depends on debianutils 1.13.  That was also in
woody.
+  * Add xserver-xorg-video-geode to -all on i386 (closes: #567909).
+
+  [ Cyril Brulebois ]
+  * Add myself to Uploaders.
+  * Update Debian po files by running debconf-updatepo (through
+debian/rules clean).
+
+ -- Cyril Brulebois   Sat, 04 Sep 2010 19:39:41 +0200

unblock xorg/1:7.5+7

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/19/2010 11:01 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 09/19/2010 01:46 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>> unblock xorg/1:7.5+7
>>
> 
> Unblocked.
> 

and closing the bugreport.

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---

Bug#597370: unblock: xorg/1:7.5+7

[Mehdi Dogguy]

On 09/19/2010 01:46 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 
> unblock xorg/1:7.5+7
> 

Unblocked.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95d14c.7090...@dogguy.org

Bug#597376: unblock: mathgl/1.10.2.1-2

[Mehdi Dogguy]

On 09/19/2010 08:45 AM, Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package mathgl
> 
> Usability of mathgl from python has been added. Html documentation is
> now usable.
> 

Removing some noise from the diff leaves us with:

  143 files changed, 22012 insertions(+), 24099 deletions(-)

Isn't it a bit late for such a big change? (and it doesn't fix any RC or
important bugs).

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95d021.3080...@dogguy.org

Bug#596686: marked as done (unblock: gtk2-engines-qtcurve/1.5.2-1.1 (currently in delayed/2))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:49:17 +0100
with message-id 
<1284886157.12215.7782.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#596686: unblock: gtk2-engines-qtcurve/1.5.2-1.1 
(currently in delayed/2)
has caused the Debian Bug report #596686,
regarding unblock: gtk2-engines-qtcurve/1.5.2-1.1 (currently in delayed/2)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596686
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal


Hi!

Could you please unblock gtk2-engised-qtcurve, as it fixed rc bug #590521?

The change is trivial:


diff -Nru gtk2-engines-qtcurve-1.5.2/debian/rules 
gtk2-engines-qtcurve-1.5.2/debian/rules
--- gtk2-engines-qtcurve-1.5.2/debian/rules 2010-07-22 08:41:07.0 
+0200
+++ gtk2-engines-qtcurve-1.5.2/debian/rules 2010-09-13 13:45:40.0 
+0200
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
dh $@ --parallel
 
 override_dh_auto_configure:
-   dh_auto_configure -- -DQTC_MODIFY_MOZILLA=true
+   dh_auto_configure -- -DQTC_MODIFY_MOZILLA=false
 
 get-orig-source:
uscan --verbose --force-download --no-symlink



Best regards,
  Alexander

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to de...@euro)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 14:15 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Could you please unblock gtk2-engised-qtcurve, as it fixed rc bug #590521?

Unblocked by Phil.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Re: samba_3.4.9~dfsg-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Luk Claes]

On 09/19/2010 09:24 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
> 
>> Do you think samba 3.5.5 is not ready to migrate yet, otherwise I would
>> just unblock it?
> 
> 
> (re-narrowing to -release)
> 
> Well, Adam said "upload and ping us in a couple of weeks time". That
> was on Sun 5th. So, technically speaking, we're in a couple of weeks
> timebut one might prefer the packages to receive some more
> testing.
> 
> And, anyway, we have #593823 which needs to be addressed whatever
> version we use for squeeze, so 3.5.5 will not enter testing even if
> you unblock it (for that one, I need Steve to talk with upstream as I
> feel unsafe talking abou tsymbols in libraries).

Right, though that bug does not block the migration, so can be resolved
later.

Cheers

Luk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95bb94.60...@debian.org

Re: samba_3.4.9~dfsg-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):

> Do you think samba 3.5.5 is not ready to migrate yet, otherwise I would
> just unblock it?


(re-narrowing to -release)

Well, Adam said "upload and ping us in a couple of weeks time". That
was on Sun 5th. So, technically speaking, we're in a couple of weeks
timebut one might prefer the packages to receive some more
testing.

And, anyway, we have #593823 which needs to be addressed whatever
version we use for squeeze, so 3.5.5 will not enter testing even if
you unblock it (for that one, I need Steve to talk with upstream as I
feel unsafe talking abou tsymbols in libraries).






signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#597376: unblock: mathgl/1.10.2.1-2

[Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package mathgl

Usability of mathgl from python has been added.
Html documentation is now usable.

unblock mathgl/1.10.2.1-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=el_GR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100919064513.4810.86112.report...@filippos.mechan.ntua.gr

Re: samba_3.4.9~dfsg-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Luk Claes]

On 09/19/2010 09:02 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Luca Falavigna (dktrkr...@debian.org):
> 
>>> Ftpmasters, is there something that can be done on your side?
>>
>> This is #584909.
>> I'll try to see if I can provide a fix.
> 
> 
> I know you're attending the ftpmaster meeting right now, if I properly
> read Ganneff's annoucements. Is there a chance that this bug is fixed
> so that we can reupload samba? Or should we go another way, which seems
> to be enforcing samba 3.5.5 in squeeze?
> 
> I'm worried about samba still being vulnerable in squeeze.

Do you think samba 3.5.5 is not ready to migrate yet, otherwise I would
just unblock it?

Cheers

Luk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95b7be.3040...@debian.org

Re: samba_3.4.9~dfsg-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Luca Falavigna (dktrkr...@debian.org):

> > Ftpmasters, is there something that can be done on your side?
> 
> This is #584909.
> I'll try to see if I can provide a fix.


I know you're attending the ftpmaster meeting right now, if I properly
read Ganneff's annoucements. Is there a chance that this bug is fixed
so that we can reupload samba? Or should we go another way, which seems
to be enforcing samba 3.5.5 in squeeze?

I'm worried about samba still being vulnerable in squeeze.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

linux-2.6 (v. 2.6.32-22) needed in testing

[Wenceslao González-Viñas]

Dear all,

I need the package to be included in testing version. In package  
webpage ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.html ) they say  
"Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact  
debian-release if update is needed)". Please update it in order to fix  
bug report #594561. Thank you very much for your help.


Best regards,

Wenceslao


Este mensaje ha sido enviado desde https://webmail.unav.es


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100919083625.22896uzyj94y0...@webmail.unav.es