Bug#605008: release.debian.org: unblock: fusionforge/5.0.2-5
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I'd like to request an unblock for fusionforge/5.0.2-4, which contains a single patch fixing RC bug #604218: , | === modified file 'gforge/deb-specific/install-chroot.sh' | --- gforge/deb-specific/install-chroot.sh 2010-10-03 13:36:24 + | +++ gforge/deb-specific/install-chroot.sh 2010-11-26 08:48:49 + | @@ -77,10 +77,6 @@ | # pthread cancel | cp /lib/libgcc_s* $CHROOTDIR/lib | | - # pam extras | - # pam_limits.so | - cp /lib/libcap* $CHROOTDIR/lib | - | # nss extras | # /lib/libnss_pgsql ? | cp /lib/libcom_err* $CHROOTDIR/lib | | === modified file 'gforge/debian/changelog' | --- gforge/debian/changelog 2010-10-29 12:17:14 + | +++ gforge/debian/changelog 2010-11-26 08:50:26 + | @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ | +fusionforge (5.0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low | + | + * Stop trying to copy libcap into chroot, since it's not used by PAM | +anymore and therefore not guaranteed to be present, thanks to Lucas | +Nussbaum and Hideki Yamane (closes: #604218). | + | + -- Roland Mas lola...@debian.org Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:50:25 +0100 | + | fusionforge (5.0.2-4) unstable; urgency=low | |* Fixed logic in create-mailing-lists.pl script, allowing it to actually ` Explanation for the bug and patch: PAM used to depend on libcap2, so the corresponding files had to be copied into the chroot. That has changed (in 2007 apparently), and there are systems where libcap2 isn't installed, and the script fails on them. In “real-world” systems the risk is small because ntp (which is commonly installed on servers) pulls in libcap2, but the bug exists nevertheless. Thanks, Roland. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Roland Mas Qu'est-ce qui est jaune, qui pèse deux cents kilos et qui chante ? Un canari. Belle bête, pas vrai ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d3ps8mmv@mirexpress.internal.placard.fr.eu.org
Bug#605008: marked as done (release.debian.org: unblock: fusionforge/5.0.2-5)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:04:05 +0100 with message-id 20101126100405.ga31...@thrall.0x539.de and subject line Re: Bug#605008: release.debian.org: unblock: fusionforge/5.0.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #605008, regarding release.debian.org: unblock: fusionforge/5.0.2-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 605008: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605008 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I'd like to request an unblock for fusionforge/5.0.2-4, which contains a single patch fixing RC bug #604218: , | === modified file 'gforge/deb-specific/install-chroot.sh' | --- gforge/deb-specific/install-chroot.sh 2010-10-03 13:36:24 + | +++ gforge/deb-specific/install-chroot.sh 2010-11-26 08:48:49 + | @@ -77,10 +77,6 @@ | # pthread cancel | cp /lib/libgcc_s* $CHROOTDIR/lib | | - # pam extras | - # pam_limits.so | - cp /lib/libcap* $CHROOTDIR/lib | - | # nss extras | # /lib/libnss_pgsql ? | cp /lib/libcom_err* $CHROOTDIR/lib | | === modified file 'gforge/debian/changelog' | --- gforge/debian/changelog 2010-10-29 12:17:14 + | +++ gforge/debian/changelog 2010-11-26 08:50:26 + | @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ | +fusionforge (5.0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low | + | + * Stop trying to copy libcap into chroot, since it's not used by PAM | +anymore and therefore not guaranteed to be present, thanks to Lucas | +Nussbaum and Hideki Yamane (closes: #604218). | + | + -- Roland Mas lola...@debian.org Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:50:25 +0100 | + | fusionforge (5.0.2-4) unstable; urgency=low | |* Fixed logic in create-mailing-lists.pl script, allowing it to actually ` Explanation for the bug and patch: PAM used to depend on libcap2, so the corresponding files had to be copied into the chroot. That has changed (in 2007 apparently), and there are systems where libcap2 isn't installed, and the script fails on them. In “real-world” systems the risk is small because ntp (which is commonly installed on servers) pulls in libcap2, but the bug exists nevertheless. Thanks, Roland. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Roland Mas Qu'est-ce qui est jaune, qui pèse deux cents kilos et qui chante ? Un canari. Belle bête, pas vrai ? ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Roland, am Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:22:48AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: I'd like to request an unblock for fusionforge/5.0.2-4, which contains a single patch fixing RC bug #604218: unblocked, thanks. Kind regards Philipp Kern ---End Message---
Re: Next Lenny Point Release (5.0.7)
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Philipp Kern wrote: Hi there, the next Lenny Point Release (5.0.7) is scheduled to happen on Saturday, November 27th. We will start at approximately 11 UTC. The queue will be frozen one week before the set date, i.e. on November 20th. If there's something that should still be in- or excluded, please contact us ASAP on `debian-rele...@lists.debian.org'. Another d-i respin is in the queue and will be hopefully done in time. ;-) Arg! I almost miss this. I've just uploaded base-files_5lenny8. If autobuilders are unable to catch up at this point, there is always the option of cross-compiling (I remember we did that at least once in the past). I'm very sorry for the delay. Hope it is not too late. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.1.10.1011261401540.12...@kolmogorov.unex.es
Bug#605022: unblock: canna/3.7p3-6.5
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package canna as it fixes two RC bugs (including one
unreported piuparts uninstallation fail). Changelog reads as fellows:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Urgency high due to RC bug fix
* Fix problem when trying to delete user twice on purge (postrm purge
might be indeed called twice; see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/10/msg00345.html
for details) (Closes: #579312)
* Use userdel instead of the non-essential deluser in postrm
* Include danish debconf template (Closes: #589865)
* Also fix lintian error on weak library dependency for libcanna1g-dev
on libcanna1g by version the dependency with (= ${binary:Version})
unblock canna/3.7p3-6.5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101126130925.32382.65975.report...@localhost
Bug#605022: marked as done (unblock: canna/3.7p3-6.5)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:22:32 +0100
with message-id 4cefb498.7030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#605022: unblock: canna/3.7p3-6.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #605022,
regarding unblock: canna/3.7p3-6.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
605022: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605022
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package canna as it fixes two RC bugs (including one
unreported piuparts uninstallation fail). Changelog reads as fellows:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Urgency high due to RC bug fix
* Fix problem when trying to delete user twice on purge (postrm purge
might be indeed called twice; see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/10/msg00345.html
for details) (Closes: #579312)
* Use userdel instead of the non-essential deluser in postrm
* Include danish debconf template (Closes: #589865)
* Also fix lintian error on weak library dependency for libcanna1g-dev
on libcanna1g by version the dependency with (= ${binary:Version})
unblock canna/3.7p3-6.5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 26/11/2010 14:09, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package canna as it fixes two RC bugs (including one
unreported piuparts uninstallation fail). Changelog reads as fellows:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Urgency high due to RC bug fix
* Fix problem when trying to delete user twice on purge (postrm purge
might be indeed called twice; see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/10/msg00345.html
for details) (Closes: #579312)
* Use userdel instead of the non-essential deluser in postrm
* Include danish debconf template (Closes: #589865)
* Also fix lintian error on weak library dependency for libcanna1g-dev
on libcanna1g by version the dependency with (= ${binary:Version})
unblock canna/3.7p3-6.5
I already unblocked this one when saw the upload.
Thanks for your work,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
---End Message---
Re: Fixing speech-dispatcher with flite
ADB == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: ADB On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 23:55 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Bug #603897 makes speech dispatcher unable to use the flite speech synthesis engine, because of an inappropriate patch http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;filename=07_flite-1.4-fix.dpatch;att=1;bug=577896 while the actual proper upstream fix is just http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=19;filename=patch;att=1;bug=603897 This bug doesn't make the package completely non-functional because speech dispatcher is able to use other voices, but their quality is quite differing. Would dropping the inappropriate patch and use the proper upstream fix ok at this point of the freeze? ADB Yes, please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded, please unblock speech-dispatcher 0.7-6. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877hg09rey@blackbird.nest.zamazal.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: base-files_5lenny8_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1plylq-0002as...@franck.debian.org
Bug#605031: unblock: developers-reference/3.4.4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package developers-reference It's “just” a documentation and translation update. Most of the changes are already online for quite some time. developers-reference-ja has been (re-)added since most chapters have been completed (only html and txt built, thus modified debian/rules and debian/control) and po4a addenda support has been added (thus modified Makefile, between other minor changes in Makefile). unblock developers-reference/3.4.4 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101126150118.24351.48245.report...@mikado.tilapin.org
Bug#604855: unblock: shibboleth-sp2/2.3.1+dfsg-3
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes: Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu writes: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes: Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu writes: Maybe invoke-rc.d --quiet apache2 restart || [ $? -eq 100 ] ? Ah, that's a good idea. I didn't realize invoke-rc.d had a special exit status for a missing script. But anyway, can the Shibboleth module be enabled when Apache isn't installed? The restart is already protected by this check: if [ -f /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/shib2.load ] ; then invoke-rc.d apache2 restart fi I think it can if Apache is then removed (but not purged) Sure, but this isn't a problem, because if /etc/apache2/mods-enabled is present, then /etc/init.d/apache2 is also present[1], and quietly returns success if the actual daemon is not installed. [1] Well, at least they belong to the same package, but they are under /etc, so may be freely changed by the system administrator. I don't think we should care for such pathologic cases. Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: the apache init script already has a status method, why don't you use invoke-rc.d apache2 status /dev/null 21 invoke-rc.d apache2 restart I like this idea. Any objections against the following code? if [ -f /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/shib2.load ] ; then if invoke-rc.d apache2 status /dev/null ; then invoke-rc.d apache2 restart fi fi I decided to swap s for readability and || true for keeping the exit status of the restart operation should we decide to actually try that. -- Thanks, Feri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87eia8vzzu@tac.ki.iif.hu
Please unblock rtfm and movabletype-opensource
The following two are just RC bug fixes: unblock rtfm/2.4.2-4 unblock movabletype-opensource/4.3.4+dfsg-2 Thanks for your continued efforts, release team! Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101126160613.gb5...@urchin.earth.li
lilypond in squeeze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Don, lilypond in sid seems to fix several RC bugs [1] [2] [3], but has a rather intimidating diffstat compared with the version in squeeze (a new upstream version), and appears to have failed repeatedly on s390 (possibly not lilypond's fault, it looks like fontforge dying). Do you have any plans for how to fix these RC bugs for squeeze? Are the fixes feasible to backport, for instance? Regards, Simon [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380855 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545911 [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560487 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIVAwUBTO/dok3o/ypjx8yQAQi0shAAoDVBG7NCkE84sKnoC0EhsBoprTHL1jgn dro3R0ij4KYhp4K0xPckk+DQwe6FlOCIYq98OXYLpIvBnWfsYf6H20OiVYfzu88U nVvQLZ1An29jFbN+Hjyoz2Fcn67P0KZeVdMEGhe8nFkjkIvbs1K7CDd8Y02q70q/ PvnfCLP+jnNM+iEP0ZarawgUD+uL2fqK0C5jDVPNZKWNr6Ot+C11J4EmlW69Tnkr qGubu/20tYY2kcQdfhN6exOHAV6SxrzVcKAYM8yuSTN3bFGSm09xRiWNJt9NGq7W +5nD4Kx3N/KY9mjZxPwr9waW23aWBdIGTtt4JOUxztJ2Qm111XkK18F3bTjutQvD /LX0caoVRLizi45CKpeYV50RrSJFZS1qFpRJz0sMjbF2Tq+qB5S5R3Q94AEfFhht W+g0lTgt51p49aaQ/bSbbmBqQBcK1zuza+Q/ugTCirosltMzmAAX2Y5OsolMLGQW a2zEFaJUfcYkvZXQlI5u1HdxinUBCHCJ2w/EOnomIVZ35GLkI3/lxWYZ5aDMWxkl 42951vms3XHJMqMZA10VHPMCXIJaa1Z5wtGZ2OJ+qLbZAszHPdDrMseRR5rSSK8B 4z4uly9iCuW8zWnHujnW0fLIC9k4rV/w2IZZQTgA5YqDIrpgAE5yMBPGU9HAmqnO sz0/om/OpXc= =koeq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101126161745.ga13...@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk
Bug#604855: unblock: shibboleth-sp2/2.3.1+dfsg-3
On 26/11/2010 16:57, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Michael Bieblbi...@debian.org writes:
the apache init script already has a status method, why don't you use
invoke-rc.d apache2 status/dev/null 21 invoke-rc.d apache2 restart
I like this idea. Any objections against the following code?
if [ -f /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/shib2.load ] ; then
if invoke-rc.d apache2 status/dev/null ; then
invoke-rc.d apache2 restart
fi
fi
It's fine for me (if it matters).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
me...@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cefedf0.6050...@debian.org
Re: Please unblock rtfm and movabletype-opensource
On 26/11/2010 17:06, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: The following two are just RC bug fixes: unblock rtfm/2.4.2-4 unblock movabletype-opensource/4.3.4+dfsg-2 Both unblocked. (Please report a bug against release.debian.org with appropriate usertags set for future unblock requests). Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cefeeb4.8060...@dogguy.org
Re: Fixing speech-dispatcher with flite
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 13:54 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: ADB == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: ADB On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 23:55 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Bug #603897 makes speech dispatcher unable to use the flite speech synthesis engine, because of an inappropriate patch http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;filename=07_flite-1.4-fix.dpatch;att=1;bug=577896 while the actual proper upstream fix is just http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=19;filename=patch;att=1;bug=603897 This bug doesn't make the package completely non-functional because speech dispatcher is able to use other voices, but their quality is quite differing. Would dropping the inappropriate patch and use the proper upstream fix ok at this point of the freeze? ADB Yes, please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded, please unblock speech-dispatcher 0.7-6. Unblocked, after fighting the huge debian-changes-* patches :-/ Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1290803129.13711.1759.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: fixing 604471/591615 (Malayalam rendering problem) in squeeze
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 12:50 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: Attached is a diff between icu-4.4.1-6 and icu-4.4.1-7 which fixes merged RC-critical bugs 604471 and 591615. I can't do this through unstable because unstable already contains 4.4.2, a new upstream release (albeit one with only bug fixes). [...] With the (US) holiday weekend, I will not be around my email quite as often as usual, so I have gone ahead and uploaded this to testing-proposed-updates for you to either accept or reject. I hope that's okay -- I know it requires manual intervention either way, so I'm trying to do what makes it easiest for the release team. Approved and just waiting for all architectures to be available; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1290803651.13711.1806.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Freeze exception for libjs-jac
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:56:28PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 29-08-2010 19:51, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Please unblock libjs-jac, the new version closes #593799. Base version: jsjac_1.3.1-3 from testing Target version: jsjac_1.3.2+dfsg-1 from unstable 94 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 27383 deletions(-) Although the upload closes #593799 it has a new upstream version and some major changes, so I'm a little bit hesitant in unblock this without a second opinion. Upstream site http://blog.jwchat.org/download/ says the 1.3.2 happened back in 2008, the Package QA shows the package is untouched since end 2008. Sorry for the late response. We have just backported our fixes to the previous upstream version. * Is it really better to have a new upstream without any tests at this point? Or, can you elaborate a little bit of why it would be important to have a new untested upstream version at this point? Unfortunately, it was only after packaging this new upstream version in response to the RC bug that we realized it fixes a bug when interacting with some other XMPP clients. Best would be that we open it and close with the new upstream version. * Can you provide a backport to 1.3.1 that would fix the non-free bug? Right now, we have decided to go that way, since the new upstream version does some code changes. Although we have tested it under a deployment of ours, that's not as good as Debian coverage. It's at http://people.debian.org/~metal/jsjac/. Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkx7HdkACgkQCjAO0JDlykbebQCfXVkXncvFNPShIyg2uhQqhqtW GFIAmwcrW9cL5kBSqpmQ9o26vKu6nHqj =N58Y -END PGP SIGNATURE- Regards, Cascardo. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Freeze exception for libjs-jac
On 11/26/2010 09:33 PM, Thadeu Cascardo wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:56:28PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: * Can you provide a backport to 1.3.1 that would fix the non-free bug? Right now, we have decided to go that way, since the new upstream version does some code changes. Although we have tested it under a deployment of ours, that's not as good as Debian coverage. It's been removed from testing since then. We are not able to re-include because it's late. Please feel free to do any update to your package in sid. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cf01cb3.6020...@debian.org
Bug#605056: unblock: kde4libs/4:4.4.5-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package kde4libs I have just uploaded a new revision of kde4libs to fix incorrect Replaces with kdelibs-data. This unreported bug could be considered RC. A new revision also includes debian/changelog clean up (for versions which have never been uploaded to archive) and correction of Vcs-* fields, which both are harmless and are a consequence of switching our packaging VCS. unblock kde4libs/4:4.4.5-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=lt_LT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101126204840.5086.42528.report...@mdxdesktop.lan.vainius.eu
Re: Git fixes for squeeze
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 00:55 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 18:47:40 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Jonathan Nieder wrote: Some quick changes for git in squeeze. - Trivial fixes from upstream: memory leaks in cache_tree_free and diff; confusing use of static buffer in setup_git_env; dependence on signed int overflow semantics. - Documentation formatting fixes (mostly stray backslashes in manpages) to fix bugs #540001, #600422. - Weaker dependencies for gitweb [...] - Another fix from upstream. gitweb: Reload configuration after each request. This fixes a regression introduced by v1.7.2-rc2 in some gitolite setups. [...] Please go ahead with the urgent changes (I don't have time right now to go through the rest, so it's probably best to look at getting them in separately later). For the record, the above has now been uploaded, and I've just unblocked git 1:1.7.2.3-2.1. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1290806399.13711.2035.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#603702: unblock: iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg1-2
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 08:22 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:23:13PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:58 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: As discussed with Moritz from the security team there won't be any security support from upstream for any of the beta releases. So I added a note explaining that to README.Debian: [...] Is there an ETA for a final upstream release? Do we have any idea how feasible backporting fixes from later versions is likely to be? Newer (supported or not) versions require newer icedove since they only support the latest version for the calendaring extension. Iceowl (aka sunbird) isn't supported by upstream at all afaik. We'd need at least all the icedove/xulrunner patches for proper security support. Apologies for the delay in getting back to you about this. After some thought, I'm not convinced that we should be shipping an unsupported beta release of a leaf Mozilla package (albeit one with a non-trivial popcon) in a stable release so removal may be the best option. :-/ Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1290806988.13711.2092.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: spacefun theme of slim in squeeze
Hi,
About this question, I do not get an answer.
Would you review a patch?
Spacefun theme
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/SpaceFun
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2010/11/14 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@debian.org:
Hi, Release Team.
I want to put a theme of spacefun in squeeze.
The revision is as follows.
diffstat for slim_1.3.1-7 slim_1.3.1-8
debian/debian-spacefun.shar | 7205
++
slim-1.3.1/debian/changelog | 10
slim-1.3.1/debian/patches/slim-conf.patch | 2
slim-1.3.1/debian/rules | 2
slim-1.3.1/debian/slim.install | 1
5 files changed, 7219 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -u slim-1.3.1/debian/changelog slim-1.3.1/debian/changelog
--- slim-1.3.1/debian/changelog
+++ slim-1.3.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+slim (1.3.1-8) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New theme.
+ - Add new theme debian-spacefun and set it as default (Closes: #603256).
+ - Update patches/slim-conf.patch.
+ - Add remove function of debian/debian-spacefun to debian/rules.
+ - Add debian-spacefun to debian/slim.install.
+
+ -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@debian.org Sun, 14 Nov 2010 07:40:05 +0900
And I attached debdiff.
May I upload it to unstable? And would you unblock 1.3.1-8?
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinn8agdrqkgpya0rjfemox-5tq-rdnnsprpe...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#605066: marked as done (unblock: ocrodjvu/0.4.6-3)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:12:22 +0100 with message-id 20101126221222.ga3...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#605066: unblock: ocrodjvu/0.4.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #605066, regarding unblock: ocrodjvu/0.4.6-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 605066: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605066 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ocrodjvu. The changelog is: ocrodjvu (0.4.6-3) unstable; urgency=low * New maintainer (closes: #598156). * Fixed typo in djvu2hocr (closes: #600539). * Added Vcs-fields in debian/control. Thanks, Daniel Stender -- http://www.danielstender.com/granthinam/ GPG key ID: 1654BD9C ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 0, Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com wrote: Please unblock package ocrodjvu. The changelog is: Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy ---End Message---
Bug#605066: unblock: ocrodjvu/0.4.6-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ocrodjvu. The changelog is: ocrodjvu (0.4.6-3) unstable; urgency=low * New maintainer (closes: #598156). * Fixed typo in djvu2hocr (closes: #600539). * Added Vcs-fields in debian/control. Thanks, Daniel Stender -- http://www.danielstender.com/granthinam/ GPG key ID: 1654BD9C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cf02e9e.7040...@danielstender.com
Re: spacefun theme of slim in squeeze
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 06:44 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: About this question, I do not get an answer. That's probably because your mail never mail it to debian-release (at least, I didn't receive it and there isn't a copy in the web archive on lists.d.o) [...] 2010/11/14 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@debian.org: [...] debian/debian-spacefun.shar | 7205 ++ [...] And I attached debdiff. If the debdiff included the above file, then I suspect lists.d.o dropped the mail for being over-sized. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1290810372.13711.2375.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Freeze exception for libjs-jac
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:46 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 11/26/2010 09:33 PM, Thadeu Cascardo wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:56:28PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: * Can you provide a backport to 1.3.1 that would fix the non-free bug? Right now, we have decided to go that way, since the new upstream version does some code changes. Although we have tested it under a deployment of ours, that's not as good as Debian coverage. It's been removed from testing since then. We are not able to re-include because it's late. Please feel free to do any update to your package in sid. This is the same version as that present in lenny, but it fixes a RC bug. Isn't it possible to put it through testing-proposed-updates? Cheers, -- Marcelo Jorge Vieira xmpp:me...@jabber-br.org http://metaldot.alucinados.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#605072: security unblocks (bind9, liburcu)
package: release.debian.org severity: normal usertags: unblock Please unblock bind9 and liburcu. bind9 fixes CVE-2010-3762, and liburcu is blocking an ust update that fixes CVE-2010-3386. Thanks, Mike unblock bind9/1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-2 unblock liburcu/0.4.8-1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikdyyvem9o9zxkweoqkxbzbaer91enjtbkdc...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#605072: security unblocks (bind9, liburcu)
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 18:12 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: Please unblock bind9 and liburcu. bind9 fixes CVE-2010-3762, For which a targeted t-p-u upload was requested a few days ago in #602839. and liburcu is blocking an ust update that fixes CVE-2010-3386. What's blocking ust is the size and content of the diff, not other packages; see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598309#60 and follow-ups, which result in Moritz and the maintainer discussing a t-p-u upload. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1290814393.13711.2716.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#605072: security unblocks (bind9, liburcu)
retitle 605072 unblock liburcu/0.4.8-1 thanks On 11/27/2010 12:12 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: unblock bind9/1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-2 Already reported as #602839. unblock liburcu/0.4.8-1 94 files changed, 26341 insertions(+), 27150 deletions(-) It even has the following change: + * [8d60a0] Set debian source format to 3.0 (quilt) So, no way. Besides, is this this request about liburcu or ust? It's a no for both of them anyway. We will accept only targetted fixes. (Please file seperate bugreports for your unblock requests next time). Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cf043a8.1090...@dogguy.org
Processed: Re: Bug#605072: security unblocks (bind9, liburcu)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 605072 unblock liburcu/0.4.8-1 Bug #605072 [release.debian.org] security unblocks (bind9, liburcu) Changed Bug title to 'unblock liburcu/0.4.8-1' from 'security unblocks (bind9, liburcu)' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 605072: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605072 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12908145901304.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#598153: marked as done (unblock: autodocktools/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-2)
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2010 00:38:56 +0100 with message-id 4cf04510.8080...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#598153: unblock: autodocktools/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #598153, regarding unblock: autodocktools/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 598153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598153 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package autodocktools The version currently in the archive still has the dependency on python 2.5. This has been resolved. In a previous attempt to upload this package I had stupidly already referenced the package mgltools-scenario2 as a dependency, i.e. my internal backport had failed. Unstable now harbors a new attempt. Thanks Steffen unblock autodocktools/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 09/27/2010 01:01 AM, Steffen Moeller wrote: Please unblock package autodocktools The version currently in the archive still has the dependency on python 2.5. This has been resolved. In a previous attempt to upload this package I had stupidly already referenced the package mgltools-scenario2 as a dependency, i.e. my internal backport had failed. Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. It seems that we failed to reply within an appropriate delay (and no one pinged us about it). autodocktools won't be unblocked for Squeeze I'm afraid, since it's quite late now. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ ---End Message---
Bug#596624: marked as done (unblock: autodocktools/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1)
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2010 00:38:56 +0100 with message-id 4cf04510.8080...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#598153: unblock: autodocktools/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #598153, regarding unblock: autodocktools/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 598153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598153 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package autodocktools and its dependencies Version 1.5.4 of the autodocktools is already in lenny. But the advent of Python 2.6 it was not prepared for, which led to the recent submission of a series of serious bug reports (#596318 to #596325 and earlier ones). In some unfortunate redundant effort those have been addressed by d...@d.o (performing an NMU) and pi...@d.o (performing fixes in the debian med svn). As the maintainer I have been in frequent contact with upstream, whose work on 1.5.6 has sadly not made it for the freeze and the cvs showing too many difficulties. I was today now uploading the very latest of the 1.5.4 branch, i.e. the official release. For best possible communication of our users with upstream, I did not want to perform partial updates. Everyone should rest assured that they get what upstream wants them to have. Talking back to upstream, not functional changes have been performed, but some smaller glitches corrected and upstream is aware of Python 2.6, which was not the case for the previous version from June last year. So, for compatibility with Python 2.6, we have * work by doko, pjotr and myself on the Debian front * work by upstream from their scm Please unblock the following packages: unblock autodocktools/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-bhtree/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-dejavu/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-geomutils/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-gle/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-mglutil/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-molkit/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-networkeditor/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-opengltk/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-pmv/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-pyautodock/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-pybabel/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-pyglf/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-sff/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-support/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-symserv/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-utpackages/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-viewerframework/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-vision/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 unblock mgltools-volume/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1 Many thanks Steffen -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 09/27/2010 01:01 AM, Steffen Moeller wrote: Please unblock package autodocktools The version currently in the archive still has the dependency on python 2.5. This has been resolved. In a previous attempt to upload this package I had stupidly already referenced the package mgltools-scenario2 as a dependency, i.e. my internal backport had failed. Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. It seems that we failed to reply within an appropriate delay (and no one pinged us about it). autodocktools won't be unblocked for Squeeze I'm afraid, since it's quite late now. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ ---End Message---
Re: lilypond in squeeze
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Simon McVittie wrote: lilypond in sid seems to fix several RC bugs [1] [2] [3], but has a rather intimidating diffstat compared with the version in squeeze (a new upstream version), and appears to have failed repeatedly on s390 (possibly not lilypond's fault, it looks like fontforge dying). Do you have any plans for how to fix these RC bugs for squeeze? Are the fixes feasible to backport, for instance? The fix is to unblock lilypond. The only reason it didn't make it in for the freeze were the failures of fontforge brought about by a new version. Don Armstrong -- I'd sign up in a hot second for any cellular company whose motto was: We're less horrible than a root canal with a cold chisel. -- Cory Doctorow http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101126235221.gi16...@teltox.donarmstrong.com
Bug#599532: Freeze exception request for conky 1.8.1
On 11/02/2010 03:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 16:04:15 +0100, Cesare Tirabassi wrote: On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 15:07:23 +0100 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 15:57:18 +0100, Cesare Tirabassi wrote: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=105262 Why would one configure stuff to download a page every second? http://git.omp.am/?p=conky.git;a=commitdiff;h=acbb531adf122bef037fc47e81c7da9314876014 Feel free to consider it as important/release critical or not. I'd much rather have this trivial change than the other one for squeeze... Could you please show us a diff that includes the changes acked by Julien? or should I close this bugreport? Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cf04700.7080...@debian.org
