Oferta comerciala
Buna ziua, Ma numesc Alexandru Adrian si reprezint firma S.C. Magic Business Solution S.R.L. si doresc sa va cer acordul pentru a va trimite informatii referitoare la activitatile / ofertele pe care compania noastra le presteaza. Societatea noastra ofera servicii complete de web design, logo design, email marketing. Realizam magazine online la cheie , site-uri de prezentare pentru orice tip de firma , site-uri tematice,blog-uri, forum-uri, portaluri, aplicatii web, etc. Avantajul pe care il creeaza un site este prezenta 24 din 24 pe unul dintre cele mai largi canale de publicitate la un cost relativ mic comparativ cu celelalte canale de publicitate astfel incat potentialii clienti pot afla detalii despre produsele / serviciile pe care societatea dumneavoastra le ofera. Ca sa intelegeti importanta unui site va pot prezenta un exemplu: Luam firma X care are ca obiect de activitate comercializarea de balustrade de inox, si clientul Y care tocmai si-a construit o casa...Clientul Y cauta pe motoarele de cautare (Google , Yahoo) firmele care comercializeaza balustradele de inox care ii trebuie pentru noua sa casa. Gaseste site-urile firmelor care ofera astfel de balustrade si achizitioneaza ceea ce are nevoie. Pentru orice detalii nu ezitati sa ne contactati Va doresc o zi buna Alexandru Adrian 0723.886.842 off...@mbs-webdesign.ro Pentru dezabonare va rugam sa raspundeti la acest email si sa specificati adresele de email pe care doriti sa le eliminam din baza noastra de date -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pygnz-0006np...@server7.lok.ro
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: tzdata_2011c-0squeeze1_all.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pye4w-0005fb...@franck.debian.org
Processed: block 617797 with 589460
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 617797 with 589460 Bug #617797 [release.debian.org] transition: evolution 2.32 Was blocked by: 614086 554658 554654 615782 615724 615278 616642 615706 617771 614477 554671 611327 615263 614526 Added blocking bug(s) of 617797: 589460 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 617797: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617797 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12998851278923.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 617797 with 554671 614477
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 617797 with 554671 614477 Bug #617797 [release.debian.org] transition: evolution 2.32 Was blocked by: 614086 554658 554654 616642 615278 615724 615782 615706 617771 611327 615263 614526 Added blocking bug(s) of 617797: 614477 and 554671 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 617797: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617797 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12998836963187.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Would you cosider accepting this update to address bug 615227 in squeeze?
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:57:41 -0800, Jack Bates wrote: > Hi, to address bug 615227 in squeeze, would you consider accepting an > updated package with just these changes? > http://nottheoilrig.com/debian/201103110/patch > > - or do you have any other feedback for me, what is the best thing to > do? > A few things: - the fix should probably get a bit more exposure in unstable before we accept it in stable - changing the source package format in a stable update is a no-no - the patch itself looks reasonable enough Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311204420.gm2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Processed: Re: gdal 1.7 transition
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 617828 with 616182 555283 Bug #617828 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal 1.7 Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 617828: 616182 and 555283 > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 617828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617828 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12998757765322.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#617828: gdal 1.7 transition
block 617828 with 616182 555283 kthxbye Hi Frankie, On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:07:08 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Hi > > I already uploaded the 1.7.3 version of the library in sid. > Interested package for a binNMU are currently: > > dans-gdal-scripts had a new upstream release in the mean time, but mips picked up gdal 1.6. scheduled a binnmu for mips only. > libgdal-grass already built against gdal 1.7. > grass same as dans-gdal-scripts. > thuban binnmus scheduled > qgis needs a fix for #616182 > xastir doesn't seem to depend on libgdal1? > mapserver binnmus scheduled > merkaartor doesn't seem to depend on libgdal1? > qlandkartegt doesn't seem to depend on libgdal1? > mapnik binnmus scheduled > liblas needs a fix for #555283 Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311203609.gl2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Would you cosider accepting this update to address bug 615227 in squeeze?
Hi, to address bug 615227 in squeeze, would you consider accepting an updated package with just these changes? http://nottheoilrig.com/debian/201103110/patch - or do you have any other feedback for me, what is the best thing to do? Thank you Rik Theys for reporting this bug, finding the upstream patch, testing it, and helping update the packaging! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1299873461.11053.37.camel@selene
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: wordpress_3.0.5+dfsg-0+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.59+squeeze1_multi.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1py8vu-0002p0...@franck.debian.org
Processed: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org, usertagging 617828, usertagging 617828 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was jcris...@debian.org). > usertags 617828 - binnmu Bug#617828: nmu: mapnik_0.7.1-3 Usertags were: binnmu. Usertags are now: . > usertags 617828 + transition Bug#617828: nmu: mapnik_0.7.1-3 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: transition. > retitle 617828 transition: gdal 1.7 Bug #617828 [release.debian.org] nmu: mapnik_0.7.1-3 Changed Bug title to 'transition: gdal 1.7' from 'nmu: mapnik_0.7.1-3' > submitter 617828 "Francesco P. Lovergine" Bug #617828 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal 1.7 Changed Bug submitter to '"Francesco P. Lovergine" ' from 'da...@debian.org' > tags 617828 + pending Bug #617828 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal 1.7 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 617828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617828 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129987325927259.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: SE Linux policy update
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 23:21 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> The user friendly change list is that this makes USB flash storage devices
> usable by default on the desktop, Iceweasel works correctly, upowerd is run
> correctly in the devicekit_power_t domain, KDE mysqld access works, fetchmail
> works as a daemon, Xen starts DomUs on boot, and NetworkManager and similar
> programs (such as wicd) give more functionality.
>
> These are all serious updates that can be considered as "a truly critical
> functionality problem" for some users.
"Truly critical for some users" is a fairly large set of issues,
particularly for small values of "some". Have all of your proposed
changes been tested on Squeeze systems to ensure that they operate
correctly in that environment and don't introduce any regressions?
> I've attached a full diff between the version in Squeeze and my proposed
> update.
>
> Please let me know what else I have to do to get this included.
>
> refpolicy (2:0.2.20100524-8) unstable; urgency=low
For stable that will want to be -7+squeeze1 (or I suppose -8~squeeze1 if
you want and all of the fixes get acked).
>* Add tunable user_manage_dos_files which defaults to true
What's the current behaviour? All users can manage such files, or none
can?
>* Correctly label /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.1/xulrunner-stub
>* Allow mozilla to create directories under /tmp
>* Use correct label for /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconfd-2 and load gnome.pp on
> installation if libgconf2-4 is installed
>* Use correct label for /usr/lib/upower/upowerd
>* Dontaudit bind_t write attempts to / for lwresd calling access(".", W_OK)
"Don't audit"
>* Allow user domains to execute mysqld_exec_t, for KDE
>* Allow user_dbusd_t to execute gconfd_exec_t in user_gconfd_t.
That's this change?
+
+ optional_policy(`
+ gnome_role($2, $1_dbusd_t)
+ ')
')
Apologies if I'm missing something, but that doesn't appear to be
gconfd-specific at all.
[...]
diff -ru /tmp/t/refpolicy//policy/modules/kernel/files.fc
./policy/modules/kernel/files.fc
--- /tmp/t/refpolicy//policy/modules/kernel/files.fc2011-03-11
23:19:40.372420590 +1100
+++ ./policy/modules/kernel/files.fc2011-02-10 13:04:15.583492220 +1100
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
#
# Mount points; do not relabel subdirectories, since
# we don't want to change any removable media by default.
-/media(/[^/]*) -l gen_context(system_u:object_r:mnt_t,s0)
+/media/[^/]* -l gen_context(system_u:object_r:mnt_t,s0)
Is this part of one of the items mentioned in the changelog? If so,
which one? My possibly naive assumption was that the above is a no-op
change.
diff -ru /tmp/t/refpolicy//policy/modules/services/mysql.te
./policy/modules/services/mysql.te
--- /tmp/t/refpolicy//policy/modules/services/mysql.te 2011-03-11
23:19:40.360430274 +1100
+++ ./policy/modules/services/mysql.te 2011-02-09 10:18:33.395481018 +1100
@@ -242,3 +242,4 @@
miscfiles_read_localization(mysqlmanagerd_t)
userdom_getattr_user_home_dirs(mysqlmanagerd_t)
+
Was there supposed to be a change included there, other than the
presumably spuriously added newline?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1299872641.24129.78.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#617797: transition: evolution 2.32
On ven., 2011-03-11 at 19:45 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:53:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Currently blocked by (at least): > > #614526: contacts FTBFS > > corsac says that has an easy fix Well, an easy fix /hopefully/ (not sure if simply adding the build-dep won't reveal some more subtil build failure). Anyway I intend to nmu this next week but if someone wants to try it sooner, feel free :) Regards, -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1299870197.10954.0.camel@shelter-point
Bug#617797: transition: evolution 2.32
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:53:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Currently blocked by (at least): > #614526: contacts FTBFS corsac says that has an easy fix > #614086, #615706: dates FTBFS pochu says this one can be removed > #615278: giggle FTBFS nmued to delayed/2 > #554654: gnome-launch-box FTBFS 2 uploads ever, the last one a nmu (in 2008). will remove. > #554658: gnome-phone-manager FTBFS cdbs, with a broken ubuntu patch in the bug log, i'm afraid i can't be bothered > #615263: syncevolution FTBFS bremner seems active, will wait this one out. > #611327: lunar-applet FTBFS looks dead upstream. > #617771: mail-notification b0rkage that one has a patch, nmu candidate. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311184514.gk2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#617828: nmu: mapnik_0.7.1-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Dear RT, nmu mapnik_0.7.1-3 . ALL . -m "Bump libgdal dependency" Currently libmapnik0.7 depends on libgdal1-1.6.0, while libgdal1-1.7.0 is available in sid. Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [SRU] update for powertop in 6.0.1
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:59:51AM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > Hey, > > I would like to close one important bug in powertop, which affects the usage > on newer kernels (e.g. 2.6.37), as powertop will segfault on such kernels > due to too small buffer (see #610101). > > Please see my attached patch for powertop 1.11-1+squeeze1 Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the "config"? I agree that not segfaulting is incredibly better than segfaulting, but like this the remaining bunch of lines will be silently ignored? Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [SRM] update for ia32-libs in upcoming point release
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:58:06PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:12:17PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > +ia32-libs-gtk (20110202) UNRELEASED; urgency=high > > ^^ > > +ia32-libs (20110202) UNRELEASED; urgency=high > > ^^ > > > > Not good in a changelog. As they got never released, please collapse them > > OK, I don't really see the problem with them but I've merged the > changelogs and uploaded them both. Well, it doesn't buy us anything, not even for version tracking, given that they won't be released. > > For ia32-libs-core: Excuse my ignorance, but is fetch-and-build then > > identical to the others or does it contain other changes? > It is indeed. Then please go ahead Thanks Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Release team input on developers-reference patch
Hello, I have written a patch for the developers-reference where I update the chapter about debian developer's duties. Most notably I have added that a maintainer ought to support the (stable) release process by collaborating with the release team. Charles Plessy is worried that my text would not be in sync with your point of view. That's why I would like you to review my proposed changes: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=15;filename=0003-Document-duties-to-wort-towards-the-next-stable-rele.patch;att=3;bug=548867 Do you have objections to this text? Even if you have none, it would be great to acknowldge it so that I can commit it with confidence that I'm not mis-representing the consensus. Thank you in advance. -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311155433.gc27...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
Bug#617797: transition: evolution 2.32
On ven., 2011-03-11 at 14:53 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Currently blocked by (at least): > #614526: contacts FTBFS I'm currently VAC and AFK (away from my key) but this one at least looks easy to fix so doing an NMU (maybe with maintainer content) is definitely doable for me next week. -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1299858725.1927.2.camel@shelter-point
Processed: block 616621 with 617806
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 616621 with 617806 Bug #616621 [release.debian.org] nmu: for libsigsegv transition Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 616621: 617806 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 616621: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616621 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129985637118609.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#616590: marked as done (nmu various libapr1 rdeps on kfreebsd-*)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:07:34 +0100 with message-id <20110311150734.gi2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#616590: nmu: php5_5.3.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #616590, regarding nmu various libapr1 rdeps on kfreebsd-* to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 616590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616590 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, there is a problem with apr changing ABI on kfreebsd-* depending on -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 being used by a libapr user or not. This causes segfaults for mod_php. See bug #616323 This should not affect libapr using packages that use "apr-config --cppflags" to determine what compiler flags to use, which should include all pure apache2 module packages. Therefore I propose to just binNMU those packages that are reported to be broken (only php5 so far) instead of mass-binNMUing all packages build-depending on libapr1-dev. BTW, is there already a deadline for 6.0.1? nmu php5_5.3.5-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m "Rebuild with libapr1 1.4.2-8 (bug #616323)" --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:08:41 +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > If I restrict my grep to only include packages which have > _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and apr (like in -I/usr/include/apr-1.0) occuring on > the same line in the build log, the list is only > > fsvs > libapache2-mod-perl2 > php5 > php-svn > rapidsvn > subversion > I've scheduled these (minus fsvs, which never built on kfreebsd). Feel free to reopen if more are needed. Cheers, Julien --- End Message ---
Bug#616621: nmu: for libsigsegv transition
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 01:31:33 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > libsigsegv in unstable changes soname for the library so all depending > packages need to be rebuild. libsigsegv FTBFS on hppa and s390 with test failures. Is there any plan to get that fixed? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311144331.ga15...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#616702: transition: libvigraimpex
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 20:17:17 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > I'd like to upload libvigraimpex 1.7.1, which has changed SONAME, to > unstable. > > There is only one reverse-dependency, which will need binNMUs: > lprof. (I can schedule them myself if that's OK with you.) > > Please let me know when I can start the transition. > Assuming lprof has been tested with the new version, please go ahead, and let us know once the builds are in. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311143619.ge2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Re: libjpeg8 transition.
Hi Bill, On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 18:08:21 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Dear release team, > > I would like to proceed with the libjpeg8 transition. What are your plan ? > #547393 is marked as blocked by a number of other bugs. Can you check with the maintainers of the affected packages? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311143342.gd2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Re: festival/speech-tools transition
Dear Julien,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:30:00PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > - libestools2.1-dev is the new development package
> > > - libestools2.1-dev provides libestools2.0-dev for facilitating binNMUs
> > > - lmms and stardict need fixing, for lmms, bug #614975 should take
> > > care of things, while for stardict, I have verified that it is
> > > binNMU-able.
> > >
> > > Please advise me on whether I need to do something else to make the
> > > situation right.
> >
> > lmms has been fixed by the maintainer. Could you please let me know
> > anything else I could do to facilitate the migration of festival and
> > speech-tools?
> >
> I've just scheduled binNMUs for stardict. Once that's done and the old
> libestools2.0{,-dev} are decrufted by ftpmaster we can poke britney to
> migrate them.
Thank you very much.
Kumar
--
* dpkg ponders: 'C++' should have been called 'D'
-- #Debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311143006.gj17...@146653177.ece.utexas.edu
Re: [SRM] update for network-manager in 6.0.1
Am 11.03.2011 13:24, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> Hi,
>
> are all those patches already applied in unstable? I do assume this now
> and the ACKs are dependent on that.
>
FWIW, the attached patch is the one I intended to upload given the feedback so
far.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 46daaec..3d344b3 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
+network-manager (0.8.1-6+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/patches/82-core-handle-device-removal.patch
+- Cherry-pick patch from upstream to correctly handle device removal when
+ properties are unreadable. (Closes: #605570)
+ * debian/patches/83-dnsmasq-send-no-config-file-instead-of-a-bogus-one.patch
+- Newer versions of dnsmasq validate the option parameters more strictly.
+ Instead of passing a bogus file name simply use --conf-file without
+ additional parameters. (Closes: #615082)
+ * debian/ifblacklist_migrate.sh
+- Only comment out iface lines if we have an exact match for the network
+ interface. (Closes: #612247)
+ * debian/patches/51-normalized-keys.patch
+- Normalize keys in ifupdown parser, so we accept options with either
+ hyphens or underscores, like e.g. bridge_ports and bridge-ports.
+ (Closes: #609831)
+
+ -- Michael Biebl Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:49:51 +0100
+
network-manager (0.8.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/patches/40-umanaged-interfaces.patch
diff --git a/debian/ifblacklist_migrate.sh b/debian/ifblacklist_migrate.sh
index 1d41266..c30971c 100644
--- a/debian/ifblacklist_migrate.sh
+++ b/debian/ifblacklist_migrate.sh
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ for i in $auto_ifs; do
if test x$nulled_line != x; then
line_count=$(expr $line_count + 1)
fi
- done
+ done
if test $line_count -eq 0 -a $word_count -gt 0; then
ifaces_to_disable="$ifaces_to_disable $i"
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ if [ -n "$ifaces_to_disable" ]; then
cp $NIF_FILE "$NIF_FILE.bak-${backup_suffix}"
for i in $ifaces_to_disable; do
echo -n "Disabling interface: $i ... "
- sed -i -e "s/^\([ \t]*iface.*$i.*\)$/#NetworkManager#\1/" $NIF_FILE
+ sed -i -e "s/^\([ \t]*iface.*[ \t]$i[ \t].*\)$/#NetworkManager#\1/" $NIF_FILE
echo done.
done
fi
diff --git a/debian/patches/50-bridge-interfaces.patch b/debian/patches/50-bridge-interfaces.patch
index f58ba5d..de243fb 100644
--- a/debian/patches/50-bridge-interfaces.patch
+++ b/debian/patches/50-bridge-interfaces.patch
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
Index: network-manager/system-settings/plugins/ifupdown/plugin.c
===
network-manager.orig/system-settings/plugins/ifupdown/plugin.c 2010-12-04 16:41:38.0 +0100
-+++ network-manager/system-settings/plugins/ifupdown/plugin.c 2010-12-04 16:51:51.810906877 +0100
-@@ -360,9 +360,49 @@
+--- network-manager.orig/system-settings/plugins/ifupdown/plugin.c 2011-03-11 14:47:00.272832466 +0100
network-manager/system-settings/plugins/ifupdown/plugin.c 2011-03-11 14:47:01.272832466 +0100
+@@ -360,9 +360,51 @@
while (block) {
if(!strcmp ("auto", block->type) || !strcmp ("allow-hotplug", block->type))
g_hash_table_insert (auto_ifaces, block->name, GUINT_TO_POINTER (1));
@@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ Index: network-manager/system-settings/plugins/ifupdown/plugin.c
+/* Try to find bridge ports */
+const char *ports = ifparser_getkey (block, "bridge_ports");
+if (ports) {
-+ PLUGIN_PRINT("SCPlugin-Ifupdown", "found bridge ports %s for %s", ports, block->name);
-+ char **port_ifaces = g_strsplit_set (ports, " \t", -1);
-+
+ int i;
+ int state = 0;
++ char **port_ifaces;
++
++ PLUGIN_PRINT("SCPlugin-Ifupdown", "found bridge ports %s for %s", ports, block->name);
++
++ port_ifaces = g_strsplit_set (ports, " \t", -1);
+ for (i = 0; i < g_strv_length (port_ifaces); i++) {
+ char *token = port_ifaces[i];
+ /* Skip crazy stuff like regex or all */
@@ -53,7 +55,7 @@ Index: network-manager/system-settings/plugins/ifupdown/plugin.c
/* Remove any connection for this block that was previously found */
exported = g_hash_table_lookup (priv->iface_connections, block->name);
if (exported) {
-@@ -385,6 +425,7 @@
+@@ -385,6 +427,7 @@
g_hash_table_insert (priv->well_known_interfaces, block->name, "known");
PLUGIN_PRINT("SCPlugin-Ifupdown", "adding mapping %s to well_known_interfaces", block->name);
}
diff --git a/debian/patches/51-normalized-keys.patch b/debian/patches/51-normalized-keys.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..750eb13
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/51-normalized-keys.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+Index: network-manager/system-settings/plugins/ifupdown/interface_parser.c
+===
+--- network-manager.orig/system-settings/plugins/ifupdown/
Processed (with 1 errors): block 617797 with 614526 614086 615706 615278 554654 554658 615263 611327 617771
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 617797 with 614526 614086 615706 615278 554654 554658 615263 611327 > 617771 Bug #617797 [release.debian.org] transition: evolution 2.32 Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 617797: 614086, 554658, 554654, 616642, 615278, 615724, 615782, 615706, 617771, 611327, 615263, and 614526 Failed to set blocking bugs of 617797: failed to get lock on /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge -- Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 545. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 617797: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617797 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129985208930248.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#617797: transition: evolution 2.32
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Tags: pending Filing this for tracking. ABI changes for: libcamel1.2-14 → libcamel1.2-19 libebook1.2-9 → libebook1.2-10 libecal1.2-7 → libecal1.2-8 libedata-book1.2-2 → libedata-book1.2-8 libedata-cal1.2-7 → libedata-cal1.2-10 libedataserver1.2-13 → libedataserver1.2-14 libedataserverui1.2-8 → libedataserverui1.2-11 libgdata(-google)?1.2-1 → ? libgtkhtml-editor0 → libgtkhtml-editor-3.14-0 Currently blocked by (at least): #614526: contacts FTBFS #614086, #615706: dates FTBFS #615278: giggle FTBFS #554654: gnome-launch-box FTBFS #554658: gnome-phone-manager FTBFS #615263: syncevolution FTBFS #611327: lunar-applet FTBFS #617771: mail-notification b0rkage These need to be fixed or removed. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311135358.ga13...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Re: festival/speech-tools transition
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 07:20:59 -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:18:17PM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > I inadvertently started a speech-tools + festival transition, and made
> > some errors in my previous upload. The current situation in unstable
> > is:
> >
> > - libestools2.1-dev is the new development package
> > - libestools2.1-dev provides libestools2.0-dev for facilitating binNMUs
> > - lmms and stardict need fixing, for lmms, bug #614975 should take
> > care of things, while for stardict, I have verified that it is
> > binNMU-able.
> >
> > Please advise me on whether I need to do something else to make the
> > situation right.
>
> lmms has been fixed by the maintainer. Could you please let me know
> anything else I could do to facilitate the migration of festival and
> speech-tools?
>
I've just scheduled binNMUs for stardict. Once that's done and the old
libestools2.0{,-dev} are decrufted by ftpmaster we can poke britney to
migrate them.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311133000.gc2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Re: festival/speech-tools transition
Dear Release Team, On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:18:17PM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > I inadvertently started a speech-tools + festival transition, and made > some errors in my previous upload. The current situation in unstable > is: > > - libestools2.1-dev is the new development package > - libestools2.1-dev provides libestools2.0-dev for facilitating binNMUs > - lmms and stardict need fixing, for lmms, bug #614975 should take > care of things, while for stardict, I have verified that it is > binNMU-able. > > Please advise me on whether I need to do something else to make the > situation right. lmms has been fixed by the maintainer. Could you please let me know anything else I could do to facilitate the migration of festival and speech-tools? Thanks! Kumar -- Are Linux users lemmings collectively jumping off of the cliff of reliable, well-engineered commercial software? -- Matt Welsh signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [SRM] update for ia32-libs in upcoming point release
On Fri, March 11, 2011 13:12, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:12:17PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > +ia32-libs-gtk (20110202) UNRELEASED; urgency=high > ^^ > +ia32-libs (20110202) UNRELEASED; urgency=high > ^^ > > Not good in a changelog. As they got never released, please collapse them OK, I don't really see the problem with them but I've merged the changelogs and uploaded them both. > For ia32-libs-core: Excuse my ignorance, but is fetch-and-build then > identical to the others or does it contain other changes? It is indeed. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/34ae90a2bff51fdab095e833c7b7d098.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
Re: [SRM] update for network-manager in 6.0.1
Am 11.03.2011 13:24, schrieb Philipp Kern: > Hi, > > are all those patches already applied in unstable? I do assume this now > and the ACKs are dependent on that. Yep, all patches are in unstable resp. wheezy. > >> 4/ >> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-utopia/network-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=1760e95bcd76dafd48afe3043d64ea72f96d7a24 >> Newer versions of dnsmasq validate the option parameters more strictly. >> Instead of passing a bogus file name simply use --conf-file without >> additional parameters. >> Without this patch, Ad-Hoc mode for wireless connections is broken. >> Patch is cherry-picked from upstream Git. >> >> Fixes: #615082, severity important >> >> Please note: The version of dnsmasq in squeeze is not affected by this >> behaviour, so this would be more of a good-to-have in case of people using >> backports of dnsmasq. > > And you tested it with squeeze's dnsmasq? Yes, the patch works with older versions of dnsmasq, including the one from squeeze. According to dnsmasq upstream, the conf-file-without-arguments functionality was already available in 2.39, which is four years old. So, pretty safe from that pov. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
SE Linux policy update
I'd like to include a new version of the SE Linux policy in the Squeeze point
release. I've pasted in the changelog from the new version I just uploaded to
Unstable which is the same as the one I'd like to get in Squeeze.
The user friendly change list is that this makes USB flash storage devices
usable by default on the desktop, Iceweasel works correctly, upowerd is run
correctly in the devicekit_power_t domain, KDE mysqld access works, fetchmail
works as a daemon, Xen starts DomUs on boot, and NetworkManager and similar
programs (such as wicd) give more functionality.
These are all serious updates that can be considered as "a truly critical
functionality problem" for some users.
I've attached a full diff between the version in Squeeze and my proposed
update.
Please let me know what else I have to do to get this included.
refpolicy (2:0.2.20100524-8) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add tunable user_manage_dos_files which defaults to true
* Correctly label /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.1/xulrunner-stub
* Allow mozilla to create directories under /tmp
* Use correct label for /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconfd-2 and load gnome.pp on
installation if libgconf2-4 is installed
* Use correct label for /usr/lib/upower/upowerd
* Dontaudit bind_t write attempts to / for lwresd calling access(".", W_OK)
* Allow user domains to execute mysqld_exec_t, for KDE
* Allow user_dbusd_t to execute gconfd_exec_t in user_gconfd_t.
* Label /var/lib/fetchmail as fetchmail_uidl_cache_t and allow fetchmail_t
to
search /var/lib and manage fetchmail_uidl_cache_t dirs
* Allow xm_t to read kernel image files, needed for DomU startup on boot
* Allow gpg_agent_t to read etc_t files and sysctl_crypto_t.
* Allow network manager to run wpa_cli_exec_t programs.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Bloghttp://doc.coker.com.au/
diff -ru /tmp/t/refpolicy//debian/changelog ./debian/changelog
--- /tmp/t/refpolicy//debian/changelog 2011-03-11 23:19:40.337436375 +1100
+++ ./debian/changelog 2011-03-11 14:29:09.565411812 +1100
@@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
+refpolicy (2:0.2.20100524-8) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add tunable user_manage_dos_files which defaults to true
+ * Correctly label /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.1/xulrunner-stub
+ * Allow mozilla to create directories under /tmp
+ * Use correct label for /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconfd-2 and load gnome.pp on
+installation if libgconf2-4 is installed
+ * Use correct label for /usr/lib/upower/upowerd
+ * Dontaudit bind_t write attempts to / for lwresd calling access(".", W_OK)
+ * Allow user domains to execute mysqld_exec_t, for KDE
+ * Allow user_dbusd_t to execute gconfd_exec_t in user_gconfd_t.
+ * Label /var/lib/fetchmail as fetchmail_uidl_cache_t and allow fetchmail_t to
+search /var/lib and manage fetchmail_uidl_cache_t dirs
+ * Allow xm_t to read kernel image files, needed for DomU startup on boot
+ * Allow gpg_agent_t to read etc_t files and sysctl_crypto_t.
+ * Allow network manager to run wpa_cli_exec_t programs.
+
+ -- Russell Coker Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:28:58 +1100
+
refpolicy (2:0.2.20100524-7) unstable; urgency=low
* Allow crontab_t to create a directory of type crontab_tmp_t, necessary to
diff -ru /tmp/t/refpolicy//debian/postinst.policy ./debian/postinst.policy
--- /tmp/t/refpolicy//debian/postinst.policy 2011-03-11 23:19:40.337436375 +1100
+++ ./debian/postinst.policy 2011-01-17 14:42:35.052961684 +1100
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@
'finger' => [ 'finger', '*fingerd' ],
'ftp' => [ 'ftp', '*ftpd' ],
'gitosis' => [ 'gitosis' ],
+ 'gnome' => [ 'libgconf2-4' ],
'gpg' => [ 'gnupg' ],
'hddtemp' => [ 'hddtemp' ],
'hwclock' => [ 'util-linux' ],
diff -ru /tmp/t/refpolicy//policy/global_tunables ./policy/global_tunables
--- /tmp/t/refpolicy//policy/global_tunables 2009-07-23 04:15:30.0 +1000
+++ ./policy/global_tunables 2011-01-17 13:04:07.996933057 +1100
@@ -104,3 +104,10 @@
##
##
gen_tunable(user_tcp_server,false)
+
+##
+##
+## Allow users to manage files on dosfs_t devices, usually removable media
+##
+##
+gen_tunable(user_manage_dos_files,true)
diff -ru /tmp/t/refpolicy//policy/modules/apps/gnome.fc ./policy/modules/apps/gnome.fc
--- /tmp/t/refpolicy//policy/modules/apps/gnome.fc 2010-03-05 03:51:48.0 +1100
+++ ./policy/modules/apps/gnome.fc 2011-01-17 14:41:34.352998066 +1100
@@ -5,4 +5,8 @@
/tmp/gconfd-USER/.* -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:gconf_tmp_t,s0)
+ifdef(`distro_debian', `
+/usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconfd-2 -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:gconfd_exec_t,s0)
+', `
/usr/libexec/gconfd-2 -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:gconfd_exec_t,s0)
+')
diff -ru /tmp/t/refpolicy//policy/modules/apps/gpg.te ./policy/modules/apps/gpg.te
--- /tmp/t/refpolicy//policy/modules/apps/gpg.te 2010-05-25 05:31:36.0 +1000
+++ ./policy/modules/apps/gpg.te
Re: [SRM] update for network-manager in 6.0.1
Hi, are all those patches already applied in unstable? I do assume this now and the ACKs are dependent on that. On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 06:57:26AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > 1/ > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-utopia/network-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=9c7540deb1bd5356a12caa41dd21f898316b9a72 > > Ifupdown internally converts hyphens to underscores, this means it supports > both > bridge-ports and bridge_ports. > The linked patch updates the ifupdown plugin to support both variants. > Patch has been sent upstream and accepted. > > Fixes #609831, severity important ACK. > 2/ > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-utopia/network-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=e4568b525190677213f0a3290219145c32a6c146 > > The migration script did not properly quote the interface when disabling an > entry in /etc/network/interfaces. This could lead to a broken /e/n/i file. > Patch has been sent upstream and accepted. > > Fixes #612247, severity serious ACK. > 3/ > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-utopia/network-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=cb111f43604c48ad817c93721dc3a1d37266dbd5 > > This patch correctly handles device removal when properties are unreadable. > This > is a highly annoying bug when you plug/unplug network devices, as you had to > restart network-manager without this patch. Patch is cherry-picked from > upstream > Git. > > Fixes #605570, severity important. ACK. > 4/ > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-utopia/network-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=1760e95bcd76dafd48afe3043d64ea72f96d7a24 > Newer versions of dnsmasq validate the option parameters more strictly. > Instead of passing a bogus file name simply use --conf-file without > additional parameters. > Without this patch, Ad-Hoc mode for wireless connections is broken. > Patch is cherry-picked from upstream Git. > > Fixes: #615082, severity important > > Please note: The version of dnsmasq in squeeze is not affected by this > behaviour, so this would be more of a good-to-have in case of people using > backports of dnsmasq. And you tested it with squeeze's dnsmasq? Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [SRM] update for ia32-libs in upcoming point release
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:12:17PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thursday 10 March 2011 14:08:10 Philipp Kern wrote:
> > What about the fetch-and-build change that was requested
> > pre-release and postponed to 6.(0.)1?
>
> Right. My interest in this is to keep the package's content up to date
> regularly in (old)stable and in principle not more than that, but since these
> changes have already been discussed here previously and packages for them are
> already available I'll include those changes now aswell.
>
> Attached are debdiffs for ia32-libs{,-gtk,-core}. For ia32-libs and -gtk I'm
> basing myself on Goswin's proposed package with an update for the changed
> packages since then on top. For -core I'm basically just sponsoring Goswins
> packages since there have been no updates for its contained packages since.
>
> Because there have been no unstable uploads yet I reckon that the version
> numbers used will work correctly.
>
> Please let me know if I can upload.
+ia32-libs-gtk (20110202) UNRELEASED; urgency=high
^^
+ia32-libs (20110202) UNRELEASED; urgency=high
^^
Not good in a changelog. As they got never released, please collapse them
into one changelog entry instead.
It would be cool if those old versions files wouldn't be deleted, given that
they don't hurt.
ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk are ok. I'll do a more thorough analysis when they
hit p-u-new.
For ia32-libs-core: Excuse my ignorance, but is fetch-and-build then identical
to the others or does it contain other changes?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [SRU] Proposal of docky 2.0.12-1 for squeeze 6.0.1
>> >> I understand your concerns, but I as docky developer strongly recommend >> this update. >> >> docky 2.0.12-1 will be uploaded to unstable later this week. > > Even after that's occurred, your proposal still appears to be a direct > backport to stable of the package that would be uploaded to unstable. > That would likely be suitable for squeeze-backports, but wholesale > backports are not generally appropriate for stable updates. > I don't see this as backport. The current stable release is 2.1.1 (in experimental) which could be uploaded without a problem to unstable. But I wanted to make it clearer and keeping it in testing, so uploading 2.0.12-1 to unstable is more a like a workaround to have a presentable package. Also the 2.0 series is feature stable and maintained for over a year now to make stable-release-updates possible. If you are this unhappy with the Mono.Options patch it could be "unpatched" with quilt. (but this would lead to an untested state while the current one is) But if there is no other way this should clearly go into squeeze-backports then. Nevertheless this is an upstream bug-fix-only release. Regards, Rico signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[SRU] update for powertop in 6.0.1
Hey, I would like to close one important bug in powertop, which affects the usage on newer kernels (e.g. 2.6.37), as powertop will segfault on such kernels due to too small buffer (see #610101). Please see my attached patch for powertop 1.11-1+squeeze1 Greetings Winnie diff -u powertop-1.11/debian/changelog powertop-1.11/debian/changelog --- powertop-1.11/debian/changelog +++ powertop-1.11/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +powertop (1.11-1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low + + * Fix segfault on newer kernels with large config files. +Thanks to Mel Gorman (Closes: #610101) + + -- Patrick Winnertz Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:22:33 +0100 + powertop (1.11-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -u powertop-1.11/debian/patches/00list powertop-1.11/debian/patches/00list --- powertop-1.11/debian/patches/00list +++ powertop-1.11/debian/patches/00list @@ -1,0 +2 @@ +increase-configlimit.dpatch only in patch2: unchanged: --- powertop-1.11.orig/debian/patches/increase-configlimit.dpatch +++ powertop-1.11/debian/patches/increase-configlimit.dpatch @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run +## increase-configlimit.patch.dpatch by +## +## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch. +## DP: No description. + +@DPATCH@ +diff -urNad '--exclude=CVS' '--exclude=.svn' '--exclude=.git' '--exclude=.arch' '--exclude=.hg' '--exclude=_darcs' '--exclude=.bzr' powertop-1.11~/config.c powertop-1.11/config.c +--- powertop-1.11~/config.c 2011-01-15 11:51:23.0 + powertop-1.11/config.c 2011-01-15 11:58:55.494107143 + +@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ + #include "powertop.h" + + /* static arrays are not nice programming.. but they're easy */ +-static char configlines[5000][100]; ++#define MAXCONFIGLINES 1 ++static char configlines[MAXCONFIGLINES][100]; + static int configcount; + + static void read_kernel_config(void) +@@ -49,6 +50,8 @@ + char line[100]; + if (fgets(line, 100, file) == NULL) + break; ++ if (configcount >= MAXCONFIGLINES) ++break; + strcpy(configlines[configcount++], line); + } + pclose(file); +@@ -77,6 +80,8 @@ + char line[100]; + if (fgets(line, 100, file) == NULL) + break; ++ if (configcount >= MAXCONFIGLINES) ++ break; + strcpy(configlines[configcount++], line); + } + fclose(file); signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [SRU] Proposal of docky 2.0.12-1 for squeeze 6.0.1
On Fri, March 11, 2011 07:33, Rico Tzschichholz wrote: >> For a stable update, it's a little more than a "quite large" diff. > > Neverthelesse it is a stable update which includes fixes of half a year. > There were 92 commits since 2.0.6 which are solving several problems. That doesn't mean all of the changes are suitable for stable though. >> At that size without the translation updates, I'm afraid I'd need >> considerably more convincing to accept the update. On the third hand, >> there's also a single new file that's over 1000 lines, fixes for >> compilation with mono 2.8 - which isn't even in the archive yet alone in >> stable - plus at least one new plugin. Additionally, unstable only has >> docky 2.0.11-1 currently. >> > > Of course there are some fixes like the mono 2.8 which might not apply > directly to squeeze, but given the number of fixes besides that it > should be ok. That's not how stable updates work in Debian. If the mono 2.8 fixes were small and we were happy to accept the rest of the diff as-is, they'd probably sneak in. Neither of those are the case, and I'm not happy ignoring over 1000 lines of new code relative to the current stable package which don't actually fix any problems in stable. > All these changes already gone through quite some testing by people > using our stable ppa > (https://edge.launchpad.net/~docky-core/+archive/stable) That doesn't appear to contain any packages for squeeze? As such, it's okay for general testing but not really relevant for a stable update in Debian. >> I'm afraid that that's the case right now. It might be possible to get >> specific fixes included, but I'm not happy accepting the proposed diff >> as-is. > > I understand your concerns, but I as docky developer strongly recommend > this update. > > docky 2.0.12-1 will be uploaded to unstable later this week. Even after that's occurred, your proposal still appears to be a direct backport to stable of the package that would be uploaded to unstable. That would likely be suitable for squeeze-backports, but wholesale backports are not generally appropriate for stable updates. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/61ce6917fabf712679ed724ff29c2854.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_6.0.472.63~r59945-5+squeeze3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_6.0.472.63~r59945-5+squeeze3_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_6.0.472.63~r59945-5+squeeze3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.56+squeeze1_multi.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_1.31+squeeze1_multi.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cryptsetup_1.1.3-4squeeze2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: katoob_0.5.9.1-1.2+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pxxsm-0007ic...@franck.debian.org
