Bug#620837: Please allow apt into testing now (one-line RC bugfix)

2011-04-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode 
On Mo, 2011-04-04 at 21:31 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 04:54 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > 
> > It would be great to have APT go into testing now. The
> > change is:
> > -   if (stat(Final.c_str(),&Buf) != 0)
> > +   if (stat(Final.c_str(),&Buf) == 0)
> >msg += "\nLast-Modified: " + TimeRFC1123(Buf.st_mtime);
> >  
> > 
> > We'd like to upload another release fixing some non-RC
> > bugs, and as this RC solution is correct, it doesn't
> > make much sense to couple it with the other changes.
> > 
> 
> Aged 2 days by Julien. (If I'm not mistaken) it _should_ migrate in
> tonight's britney run.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> P.S.: Uploading with "urgency=high" would have helped to get it
> automatically migrating after 2 days delay.
It was only clear since yesterday that we want a new release, so there
was no real reason for such fast migration until then.

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1301986259.23251.19.camel@jak-thinkpad

NEW changes in oldproposedupdates

2011-04-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
Processing changes file: tesseract_2.03-2+lenny1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q6vuo-0003ha...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-04-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
Processing changes file: fcgiwrap_1.0-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mahara_1.2.6-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q6vun-0003gg...@franck.debian.org

Re: Please add support to MT 882 ADSL USB modem

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Mon, Apr  4, 2011 at 23:58:10 +0300, as wrote:

> Edit /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf and two tree line "blacklist
> rndis_wlan ,modprobe rndis_host".
> Edit etc/rc.local and add one line "modprobe rndis_host" that 's all.
> Reboot pc and have fun.
> 
User support is over at debian-u...@lists.debian.org.  Debian kernel
maintainers at debian-ker...@lists.debian.org.

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404230514.gq3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr

Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

2011-04-04 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 16:10 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> I'm just reporting this as a build-time regression in stable as it
> caused an issue when we merged recent stable updates into the Debian
> tree. I've never personally tried to configure kdump on powerpc. 
> 
> fwiw, a quick test shows that kexec doesn't work on my test box:
> 
> dannf@macmini:~$ sudo kexec -l /boot/vmlinux-2.6.32-5-powerpc
> --append="root=/dev/hda3 ro"
> --initrd=/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-powerpc
> get_memory_ranges(): Unsupported platform
> Could not get memory layout 

Yes, we've never added support for kexec on macs, I suppose that
shouldn't be too hard to do tho...

Cheers,
Ben.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1301956312.2549.94.camel@pasglop

Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

2011-04-04 Thread dann frazier 
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:33:39AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 00:10 +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > * dann frazier  [2011-04-02 11:23:03]:
> > 
> > > 2.6.32.36 also fails to build on powerpc/SMP:
> > > 
> > >   CC  arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o
> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c: In function 'crash_kexec_wait_realmode':
> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:176: error: 'paca' undeclared (first use in 
> > > this function)
> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:176: error: (Each undeclared identifier is 
> > > reported only once
> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:176: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o] Error 1
> > > make: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
> > 
> > This build is not reproducible locally, can you please
> > send the .config file.
> 
> Smells to me like a 32-bit build...

Yep, it is.

> Current upstream has the function crash_kexec_wait_realmode() protected
> by:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_64
> 
> Maybe that is missing in .32.36 ? You can disable CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP as a
> workaround. Is it that useful anyways on 32-bit ? (Does it even work ?)

I'm just reporting this as a build-time regression in stable as it
caused an issue when we merged recent stable updates into the Debian
tree. I've never personally tried to configure kdump on powerpc. 

fwiw, a quick test shows that kexec doesn't work on my test box:

dannf@macmini:~$ sudo kexec -l /boot/vmlinux-2.6.32-5-powerpc 
--append="root=/dev/hda3 ro" --initrd=/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-powerpc
get_memory_ranges(): Unsupported platform
Could not get memory layout


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404221055.gf3...@dannf.org

Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

2011-04-04 Thread dann frazier 
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:21:03PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> * dann frazier  [2011-04-02 11:23:03]:
> 
> > 2.6.32.36 also fails to build on powerpc/SMP:
> > 
> >   CC  arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c: In function 'crash_kexec_wait_realmode':
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:176: error: 'paca' undeclared (first use in 
> > this function)
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:176: error: (Each undeclared identifier is 
> > reported only once
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:176: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
> 
> Hi Dann,
> 
>   Can you please try the following patch, which adds the changes
> introduced by Kumar Gala to the commit b3df895aeb to my previous patch.

Yep, that fixes the build.

 -dann

> powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shutdown #ifdef build failure
> 
> Introducing #ifdef to fix the build failure caused by
> crash_kexec_wait_realmode(), with powerpc build with !SMP.
> 
> Reported-by: Ben Hutchings 
> Reported-by: dann frazier 
> Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal 
> cc: Paul E. McKenney 
> cc: Michael Neuling 
>   cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
> cc: Anton Blanchard 
> cc: Kumar Gala 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404215755.ge3...@dannf.org

Re: Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file

2011-04-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 18:51 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> On 6 March 2011 23:09, Adam D. Barratt  wrote:
> > For the record, I'd be happy with the squeeze upload either as is or
> > with the quilt bump + more expansive changelog entry; the main issue
> 
> Uploaded

Thanks.

I've flagged the lenny package for acceptance at the next dinstall, but
the squeeze package appears to be a little lacking in bugfixes :-)

changelog |7 +++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1301953068.23878.451.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org

Processed: Re: Bug#620038: pu: package fcgiwrap/1.0-1+squeeze1

2011-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 620038 + pending
Bug #620038 [release.debian.org] pu: package fcgiwrap/1.0-1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
620038: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620038
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13019529127873.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#620038: pu: package fcgiwrap/1.0-1+squeeze1

2011-04-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
tag 620038 + pending
thanks

On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:08 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:09:36PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > +  * Reduce the wait when just stopping (closes: #602200).
> > 
> > How likely is it that the daemon won't have successfully stopped within
> > a second (i.e. the combination of the two "sleep "$QDIETIME"s" calls)?
> 
> Unlikely, unless it's blocked somewhere and unkillable anyway, I think.  It
> doesn't install any signal handlers for TERM, so it should go down 
> immediately.

Okay; thanks.  Flagged for accept, pending dinstall.

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1301952905.23878.439.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#620883: pu: package deborphan/1.7.28.3+squeeze1

2011-04-04 Thread David Prévot 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

In order to fix an RC bug (broken orphaner on sparc, #618895), would it
be ok, to upload deborphan 1.7.28.3+squeeze1 based on 1.7.28.5 in sid to
stable-proposed-updates? The changelog would be updated accordingly.

1.7.28.5 additionally fixes #609337 to avoid libreoffice being wrongly
listed as possible orphan if --guess-section is used, e.g., during
partial upgrades or when using a libreoffice backport.

It also fixes a few translation issues, adds two new translations and
updates the Maintainer.

Please find attached the filtered diff (without translation and automake
results) obtained with the following command:

  debdiff --diffstat deborphan_1.7.28.3.dsc deborphan_1.7.28.5.dsc \
  | filterdiff -x'*.po' -x'*.pot' -x'*.in' -x'*.1' -x'*.8'

The reason for the debfoster related changes in include/config.h is that
the tarball for 1.7.28.3  was created with an old debfoster
configuration file in /etc. include/config.h is recreated during the
build anyway and the variant in 1.7.28.5 is the correct one.

Regards

Carsten and David


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


*** /tmp/deborphan_1.7.28.3-5.diff
diffstat for deborphan-1.7.28.3 deborphan-1.7.28.5

 configure  |7 
 configure.in   |8 
 debian/changelog   |   25 +
 debian/control |3 
 doc/Makefile.am|6 
 doc/Makefile.in|6 
 doc/pl/deborphan.1 |2 
 doc/po/pl.po   |4 
 doc/po/pt.po   | 1131 +
 doc/pt/Makefile.am |   21 
 doc/pt/Makefile.in |  461 +
 doc/pt/deborphan.1 |  272 
 doc/pt/editkeep.8  |   38 +
 doc/pt/orphaner.8  |   64 ++
 include/config.h   |6 
 po/ca.gmo  |binary
 po/ca.po   |2 
 po/cs.gmo  |binary
 po/cs.po   |2 
 po/da.gmo  |binary
 po/da.po   |2 
 po/de.gmo  |binary
 po/de.po   |2 
 po/deborphan.pot   |2 
 po/es.gmo  |binary
 po/es.po   |2 
 po/eu.gmo  |binary
 po/eu.po   |2 
 po/fr.gmo  |binary
 po/fr.po   |4 
 po/it.gmo  |binary
 po/it.po   |2 
 po/ja.gmo  |binary
 po/ja.po   |2 
 po/nl.gmo  |binary
 po/nl.po   |2 
 po/pl.gmo  |binary
 po/pl.po   |2 
 po/pt.gmo  |binary
 po/pt.po   |2 
 po/ru.gmo  |binary
 po/ru.po   |2 
 po/vi.gmo  |binary
 po/vi.po   |  415 +++
 src/pkginfo.c  |4 
 util/orphaner.sh   |9 
 46 files changed, 2469 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff -Nru deborphan-1.7.28.3/configure deborphan-1.7.28.5/configure
--- deborphan-1.7.28.3/configure2010-12-12 16:27:10.0 -0400
+++ deborphan-1.7.28.5/configure2011-03-26 12:57:41.0 -0400
@@ -2755,7 +2755,7 @@
 
 # Define the identity of the package.
  PACKAGE=deborphan
- VERSION=1.7.28.3
+ VERSION=1.7.28.5
 
 
 cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
@@ -3896,7 +3896,7 @@
 fi
 
 
-ALL_LINGUAS="ca cs da de es eu fr ja nl pl ru pt it"
+ALL_LINGUAS="ca cs da de es eu fr ja nl pl ru pt it vi"
 
 
   { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether NLS is requested" 
>&5
@@ -10073,7 +10073,7 @@
 
 fi
 
-ac_config_files="$ac_config_files Makefile src/Makefile doc/Makefile 
doc/po/Makefile doc/fr/Makefile doc/pl/Makefile doc/es/Makefile doc/de/Makefile 
include/Makefile po/Makefile.in intl/Makefile util/Makefile"
+ac_config_files="$ac_config_files Makefile src/Makefile doc/Makefile 
doc/po/Makefile doc/fr/Makefile doc/pl/Makefile doc/es/Makefile doc/de/Makefile 
doc/pt/Makefile include/Makefile po/Makefile.in intl/Makefile util/Makefile"
 
 cat >confcache <<\_ACEOF
 # This file is a shell script that caches the results of configure
@@ -10805,6 +10805,7 @@
 "doc/pl/Makefile") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES doc/pl/Makefile" ;;
 "doc/es/Makefile") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES doc/es/Makefile" ;;
 "doc/de/Makefile") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES doc/de/Makefile" ;;
+"doc/pt/Makefile") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES doc/pt/Makefile" ;;
 "include/Makefile") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES include/Makefile" ;;
 "po/Makefile.in") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES po/Makefile.in" ;;
 "intl/Makefile") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES intl/Makefile" ;;
diff -Nru deborphan-1.7.28.3/configure.in deborphan-1.7.28.5/configure.in
diff -Nru deborphan-1.7.28.3/debian/changelog 
deborphan-1.7.28.5/debian/changelog
--- deborphan-1.7.28.3/debian/changelog 2010-12-12 16:23:25.0 -0400
+++ deborphan-1.7.28.5/debian/ch

Please add support to MT 882 ADSL USB modem

2011-04-04 Thread as 
Edit /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf and two tree line "blacklist
rndis_wlan ,modprobe rndis_host".
Edit etc/rc.local and add one line "modprobe rndis_host" that 's all.
Reboot pc and have fun.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1301950690.2236.10.camel@as-P5K-SE

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-04-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-33_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q6puy-0006ht...@franck.debian.org

Re: Belated notice of Shibboleth transition, and apologies

2011-04-04 Thread Russ Allbery 
"Adam D. Barratt"  writes:

> I scheduled the shibboleth-sp2 binNMUs having spotted the xmltooling
> SONAME change, so you didn't get in the way of anything else. :-)

Oh, phew, okay.  :)  Still, my bad for not telling you in advance what was
going on so that you could have been saved some work.

> I failed to spot that there was a new version of opensaml2 in NEW;
> apologies for that.

That's probably because I uploaded it after you scheduled the binNMUs.  :)

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871v1hudo3@windlord.stanford.edu

Re: Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file

2011-04-04 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe 
On 6 March 2011 23:09, Adam D. Barratt  wrote:
> For the record, I'd be happy with the squeeze upload either as is or
> with the quilt bump + more expansive changelog entry; the main issue

Uploaded

Jeff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTik7jg5SX25SCsROWgZ4tpFDfD=b...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Openssl 1.0.0

2011-04-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx 
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:42:20PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I confirm that some packages still use SSLv2[1][2].
> I suggest that we do binNMU about openssl 1.0.

I'm sure we'll do binNMUs soon.  But I think the release
team might want to wait until 1.0.0 has reached testing.


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404164619.ga31...@roeckx.be

Processed: tagging 616364

2011-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 616364 + pending
Bug #616364 [release.debian.org] transition: python-numpy
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
616364: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616364
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13019342693838.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#620837: marked as done (Please allow apt into testing now (one-line RC bugfix))

2011-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:31:47 +0200
with message-id <20110404153147.go3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#620837: Please allow apt into testing now (one-line RC 
bugfix)
has caused the Debian Bug report #620837,
regarding Please allow apt into testing now (one-line RC bugfix)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
620837: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620837
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org


It would be great to have APT go into testing now. The
change is:
-   if (stat(Final.c_str(),&Buf) != 0)
+   if (stat(Final.c_str(),&Buf) == 0)
   msg += "\nLast-Modified: " + TimeRFC1123(Buf.st_mtime);
 

We'd like to upload another release fixing some non-RC
bugs, and as this RC solution is correct, it doesn't
make much sense to couple it with the other changes.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (250, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.


pgpMsjR0rsJI1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Apr  4, 2011 at 16:54:49 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> 
> 
> It would be great to have APT go into testing now. The
> change is:
> -   if (stat(Final.c_str(),&Buf) != 0)
> +   if (stat(Final.c_str(),&Buf) == 0)
>msg += "\nLast-Modified: " + TimeRFC1123(Buf.st_mtime);
>  
> 
> We'd like to upload another release fixing some non-RC
> bugs, and as this RC solution is correct, it doesn't
> make much sense to couple it with the other changes.
> 
Would be nice if you didn't have temporary build files in the uploaded
package (autom4te.cache/*).  Anyway, set age-days to 2.

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---

Bug#620837: Please allow apt into testing now (one-line RC bugfix)

2011-04-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode 
Package: release.debian.org


It would be great to have APT go into testing now. The
change is:
-   if (stat(Final.c_str(),&Buf) != 0)
+   if (stat(Final.c_str(),&Buf) == 0)
   msg += "\nLast-Modified: " + TimeRFC1123(Buf.st_mtime);
 

We'd like to upload another release fixing some non-RC
bugs, and as this RC solution is correct, it doesn't
make much sense to couple it with the other changes.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (250, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.


pgpK1pEE9SsVc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#617272: python3 transition binNMUs

2011-04-04 Thread Scott Kitterman 
Please go ahead with the following binNMUs:

gearman-interfacepython3-gearman.libgearman
jinja2   python3-jinja2/-dbg
lxml python3-lxml/-dbg
py-postgresqlpython3-postgresql
python-bsddb3python3-bsddb3/-dbg
python-drizzle   python3-drizzle/-dbg
pyyaml   python3-yaml/-dbg
sip4 python3-sip/-dbg/-dev
mod-wsgi libapache2-mod-wsgi-py3
markupsafe python3-markupsafe/-dbg

A maintainer upload of python-apt has been done, so it's taken care of and 
boost will have to wait for a sourceful upload anyway, so that should be the 
full list.

The other sourceful upload packages have been taken care of.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#616621: nmu: for libsigsegv transition

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Mon, Apr  4, 2011 at 15:40:35 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:

> s390 has been failing with some `gcc -E fails sanity check` thing which
> isn't reproducible on zelenka which makes it hard to debug.
> 
Maybe a new upload that does
./configure ... || { cat config.log; exit 1; }
would give more ideas?

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404135705.gn3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr

Bug#616621: nmu: for libsigsegv transition

2011-04-04 Thread Christoph Egger 
Hi!

Julien Cristau  writes:
> Status update after a month...
>
> On Sun, Mar  6, 2011 at 01:31:33 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
>
>> libsigsegv in unstable changes soname for the library so all depending
>> packages need to be rebuild. The depwait is needed as 2.9-1 misses the
>> actual shared library by accident (#616576) so packages build against
>> that version will link against the static library. That's also the
>> reason clisp is needed as it was build against -1
>> 
> This seems to now block on clisp's FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 and s390,

kfreebsd-i386/clisp is caused by applying the STKSZE patch in
libsigsegv. I'm trying to find out what it was supposed to fix exactly
and whether it's safe to drop it.

s390 has been failing with some `gcc -E fails sanity check` thing which
isn't reproducible on zelenka which makes it hard to debug.

> a grave bug (617501)

Should be easy enough will look later

> Also gnu-smalltalk needs a mips build.

Regards

Christoph

-- 
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer

A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?


pgpO8pBISkB0U.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#616364: Bug#611316: Bug#616364: transition: python-numpy

2011-04-04 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko 

On Mon, 04 Apr 2011, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > 616702 was cleared last night.  What's the status of the other two?
> 611316: if it holds the transition, we can remove it from testing
> until fixed (76 days RC bug, 58 popcon), but in any case: Yaroslav,
> any news on that?

I believe that fresh upstream snapshot (which took nibabel out and we
have nibabel in wheezy already) should resolve the issue -- I will
check it out later on this week.

Feel free to remove from testing if it starts to hold the transition

-- 
=--=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404133451.gz6...@onerussian.com

Processed: tagging 617272

2011-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 617272 + pending
Bug #617272 [release.debian.org] transition: python3-defaults
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
617272: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617272
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130191822114650.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#616621: nmu: for libsigsegv transition

2011-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 616621 with 617501 618777
Bug #616621 [release.debian.org] nmu: for libsigsegv transition
Was blocked by: 617806
Added blocking bug(s) of 616621: 618777 and 617501
> tag 616621 pending
Bug #616621 [release.debian.org] nmu: for libsigsegv transition
Added tag(s) pending.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
616621: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616621
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130191812914436.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#616621: nmu: for libsigsegv transition

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Cristau 
block 616621 with 617501 618777
tag 616621 pending
kthxbye

Status update after a month...

On Sun, Mar  6, 2011 at 01:31:33 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:

> libsigsegv in unstable changes soname for the library so all depending
> packages need to be rebuild. The depwait is needed as 2.9-1 misses the
> actual shared library by accident (#616576) so packages build against
> that version will link against the static library. That's also the
> reason clisp is needed as it was build against -1
> 
This seems to now block on clisp's FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 and s390, and
a grave bug (617501).
Also gnu-smalltalk needs a mips build.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404115522.ga15...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr

Bug#616364: transition: python-numpy

2011-04-04 Thread Jakub Wilk 

* Julien Cristau , 2011-04-04, 11:27:
Jakub kindly rebuilt these packages, successfully: brian h5py 
libvigraimpex magics++ mayavi2 nipy petsc4py plplot pygtk pytables 
python-scipy scikit-learn shogun .


All of these (maybe except scikit-learn) will need binNMUs. I can 
schedule them myself if that's OK for you.


Slightly worried about petsc4py as petsc is FTBFS in sid, but hopefully 
it'll be alright.  Assuming Jakub is going to take care of the binNMUs, 
I think this can go ahead.


Thanks!

Could you please add it to the transition tracker? If I got the syntax 
right, it'd be:


is_affected = .build-depends ~ /python-numpy/;
is_good = .depends ~ /python-numpy \(<< 1:1\.6\)/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /python-numpy \(<< 1:1\.5\)/;

--
Jakub Wilk



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404114938.ga9...@jwilk.net

Bug#619974: marked as done (nmu: qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1)

2011-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:44:12 +0200
with message-id <20110404114412.ga15...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#619974: nmu: qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #619974,
regarding nmu: qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
619974: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619974
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1 . alpha amd64 sparc64 . -m "Package rebuild. 
(Closes: #619096)."

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:42:36 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:

> On 03/30/2011 07:11 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The real problem appears to be that the python-qt4 libraries break ABI
> > without providing any indication of that fact to reverse-dependencies.
> > That should really be fixed so that the r-deps don't just break with no
> > warning.
> 
> CCing python-qt4 maintainers.
> 
There doesn't appear to be anything -release should do here, so closing
this bug.  (If there was indeed ABI breakage then that needs fixing in
the affected package, not rebuilds.)

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---

Bug#619221: marked as done (nmu: calibre_0.7.44+dfsg-1)

2011-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:41:23 +0200
with message-id <20110404114123.ga15...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#619221: nmu: calibre_0.7.44+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #619221,
regarding nmu: calibre_0.7.44+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
619221: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619221
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Calibre needs rebuild against the sip-api update:

nmu calibre_0.7.44+dfsg-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against python-sip 4.12.1-1 
(Closes: #616372)"

Regards,
Kanru

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-rc4+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2IEFEACgkQsbdbXzZcx6LxNwCgv8d17aJe3MB480qy7lj3x29i
PDgAn0HDL+6Fj900Zap98SrFu0w5ciwH
=JcfR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:58:29 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:

> Calibre needs rebuild against the sip-api update:
> 
> nmu calibre_0.7.44+dfsg-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against python-sip 4.12.1-1 
> (Closes: #616372)"
> 
Looks like calibre needs to use dh_sip (from the python-sip-dev package)
to get proper dependencies on the sip-api virtual package.  Please fix
that.

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---

Processed: tagging 619571

2011-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 619571 + pending
Bug #619571 [release.debian.org] A bounce of nmus for aolserver4 modules
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619571: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619571
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130191730811456.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#619191: marked as done (nmu: nettle transition)

2011-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:35:16 +0200
with message-id <20110404113516.ga15...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#619191: nmu: nettle transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #619191,
regarding nmu: nettle transition
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
619191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal

A recent new version of nettle was recently updated, introducing some API
and ABI changes. nettle doesn't have many rdepends, but these exist (and
require no source changes):

nmu chiark-utils_4.1.28+nmu2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against nettle 2.1 
(libnettle4)"
nmu chiark-tcl_1.1.0+nmu2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against nettle 2.1 (libnettle4)"
nmu rdup_1.0.5-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against nettle 2.1 (libnettle4)"

-- 
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 22:51:56 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:

> A recent new version of nettle was recently updated, introducing some API
> and ABI changes. nettle doesn't have many rdepends, but these exist (and
> require no source changes):
> 
All done:

nettle |  2.1-2 |   testing | source

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---

Bug#619571: A bounce of nmus for aolserver4 modules

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:25:42 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:

> This is due to recent change in Aolserver4 ABI for rebuilding against Tcl 8.5.
> 
> nmu aolserver4-nsimap_3.2.3-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against current aolserver4 
> and tcl8.5"
> nmu aolserver4-nsldap_0.8-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against current aolserver4 
> and tcl8.5"
> nmu aolserver4-nsmysql_0.6-9 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against current aolserver4 
> and tcl8.5"
> nmu aolserver4-nsopenssl_3.0beta26-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against current 
> aolserver4 and tcl8.5"
> nmu aolserver4-nspostgres_4.5-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against current 
> aolserver4 and tcl8.5"
> nmu aolserver4-nssha1_0.1-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against current aolserver4 
> and tcl8.5"
> nmu aolserver4-nssqlite3_0.9-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against current aolserver4 
> and tcl8.5"
> nmu aolserver4-xotcl_1.6.6-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against current aolserver4 
> and tcl8.5"
> 
I scheduled those yesterday without noticing this bug.  Note that the
source package for aolserver4-xotcl is 'xotcl'.  This is now waiting on
the openssl stuff.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404113705.ga15...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr

Bug#616364: transition: python-numpy

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Thu, Mar  3, 2011 at 21:48:07 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:

> >Jakub kindly rebuilt these packages, successfully: brian h5py
> >libvigraimpex magics++ mayavi2 nipy petsc4py plplot pygtk pytables
> >python-scipy scikit-learn shogun .
> 
> All of these (maybe except scikit-learn) will need binNMUs. I can
> schedule them myself if that's OK for you.
> 
Slightly worried about petsc4py as petsc is FTBFS in sid, but hopefully
it'll be alright.  Assuming Jakub is going to take care of the binNMUs,
I think this can go ahead.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404092716.gi3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr

Bug#620038: pu: package fcgiwrap/1.0-1+squeeze1

2011-04-04 Thread Philipp Kern 
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:09:36PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> +  * Reduce the wait when just stopping (closes: #602200).
> 
> How likely is it that the daemon won't have successfully stopped within
> a second (i.e. the combination of the two "sleep "$QDIETIME"s" calls)?

Unlikely, unless it's blocked somewhere and unkillable anyway, I think.  It
doesn't install any signal handlers for TERM, so it should go down immediately.
The wrapper is tiny and just forks off CGI processes based on FastCGI requests.
It's only 661 lines of C code after all.  ;-)

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#613735: transition: gobject-introspection

2011-04-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
On 03/04/11 16:18, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 23:52:29 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> 
>> What is still left (red columns in the migration page):
>>
>> - udev
>>
>> I've prepared a patch. Marco will look at it over the weekend.
>>
> Marco, any progress with that?
> 
>> - midgard2-core
>>
>> Would need gda bindings, but libgda4 from experimental isn't ready for
>> experimental yet (the tests fail on several arches). So I'll most likely ask 
>> the
>> maintainer to drop the gir1.0 bindings for now.
>>
> Was that done?  Should I file a bug?

I looked at the new libgda upstream release, but it doesn't fix the bugs. So
migard2-core needs to temporarily drop the gir1.2 bindings. If you can't report
a bug (I think it'll be better if you wear your RT hat) let me know and I'll do 
it.

>> - seed
>> - epiphany-extensions-more
>>
>> I have patches for these. Just need to test that they still work fine and 
>> will
>> upload them.
>>
> Did you manage to test this?

No, sorry. I'll try to do it and upload them tonight.

Emilio



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d9987dd.3010...@debian.org

Bug#616364: transition: python-numpy

2011-04-04 Thread Sandro Tosi 
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:20, Julien Cristau  wrote:
> On Sun, Apr  3, 2011 at 20:17:38 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>> How long should we keep waiting?
>>
> From http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616364:
> Fix blocked by 616702: transition: libvigraimpex, 613207: python-sphinx:
> please upload 1.x series into unstable, 611316: nipy: FTBFS: Some tests
> fail
>
> 616702 was cleared last night.  What's the status of the other two?

613207: sphinx will be uploaded along with numpy
611316: if it holds the transition, we can remove it from testing
until fixed (76 days RC bug, 58 popcon), but in any case: Yaroslav,
any news on that?

Regards,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=t3udcelkcd4aoxjakzk78jxu...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#617272: python3-defaults uploaded

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Mon, Apr  4, 2011 at 00:13:00 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:

> boost1.46 libboost-mpi-python1.46.1 - Will need rebuild, but doesn't 
> correctly 
> declare python3 runtime dependencies, so will need upload (filed as #620775)

I'd like 1.46.1-3 to migrate first (should happen tonight, I think).

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404082310.gf3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr

Bug#616364: transition: python-numpy

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Sun, Apr  3, 2011 at 20:17:38 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:

> How long should we keep waiting?
> 
>From http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616364:
Fix blocked by 616702: transition: libvigraimpex, 613207: python-sphinx:
please upload 1.x series into unstable, 611316: nipy: FTBFS: Some tests
fail

616702 was cleared last night.  What's the status of the other two?

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404082029.ge3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr

Bug#616702: marked as done (transition: libvigraimpex)

2011-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:16:59 +0200
with message-id <20110404081659.gd3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#616702: transition: libvigraimpex
has caused the Debian Bug report #616702,
regarding transition: libvigraimpex
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
616702: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616702
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

I'd like to upload libvigraimpex 1.7.1, which has changed SONAME, to 
unstable.


There is only one reverse-dependency, which will need binNMUs: lprof.  
(I can schedule them myself if that's OK with you.)


Please let me know when I can start the transition.

--
Jakub Wilk


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Apr  3, 2011 at 21:07:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 21:50 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Julien Cristau , 2011-03-11, 15:36:
> > >>I'd like to upload libvigraimpex 1.7.1, which has changed SONAME, to
> > >>unstable.
> > >>
> > >>There is only one reverse-dependency, which will need binNMUs:
> > >>lprof. (I can schedule them myself if that's OK with you.)
> > >>
> > >>Please let me know when I can start the transition.
> > >>
> > >Assuming lprof has been tested with the new version, please go ahead,
> > >and let us know once the builds are in.
> > 
> > After an unanticipated delay, both libvigraimpex and lprof has been 
> > built on all release architectures.
> 
> Thanks for the update.  I've added an easy hint add aged lprof.
> 
Migrated last night.

libvigraimpex | 1.7.1+dfsg-4 |   testing | source

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---